Method for calibrating a bioimpedance measuring device, and medical devices

Abstract

The disclosure relates to new methods for calibrating or adjusting a bioimpedance measuring device. Furthermore, the present disclosure relates to a medical set or system, a medical measuring standard, a method for testing a bioimpedance measuring device, and a bioimpedance measuring device.

Claims

1. A method for calibrating a bioimpedance measuring device, the method comprising the steps: providing the bioimpedance measuring device; providing a measuring standard with a plurality of components (X, Y, Z), that may each be adjusted in terms of their respective component value (x1, x2, . . . xm; yi, y2, . . . y; zi, z, . . . zo), so that a number |K| of combinations of component values may be set, wherein |K|=m*n*o; providing a Patient Database with a number |PDB| combinations of information, wherein each of the combinations of information comprises: a) one or more patient parameters that characterize a specific patient, wherein the one or more patient parameters are not bioimpedance measurement results; and b) a plurality of bioimpedance measurement results of the specific patient from at least one previous bioimpedance measurement process of the specific patient measured over a frequency range; determining a number |CDB| of the combinations of component values based on which the plurality of bioimpedance measurement results of at least a predetermined part of the number |PDB| of combinations of the information may be gained using Cole Models or Cole-Cole Plots, wherein the number |CDB| is less than the number |K|; providing a Calibration Database or Pool comprising the determined number |CDB| of the combinations of component values; and calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device by using the measuring standard and adjusting the plurality of components (X, Y, Z) to some or all of the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values from the Calibration Database or Pool, but not by adjusting the plurality of components (X, Y, Z) to more than the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values.

2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: filtering the Patient Database according to predetermined criteria in order to create the Calibration Database or Pool based on the Patient Database, wherein in order to create the Calibration, Database or Pool, only the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values thus filtered out of the Patient Database are used.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the predetermined criteria includes patient age, race, height, weight, or gender.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device is carried out repeatedly at different points of time.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein calibration results determined when carrying out the steps of calibrating performed at the different points of time, respectively, are compared to each other and deviations from each other are determined.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device comprises connecting measuring electrodes and signal electrodes of the bioimpedance measuring device to contacts of the measuring standard.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device starts automatically when the measuring electrodes and the signal electrodes of the bioimpedance measuring devices have been connected to the contacts of the measuring standard.

8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device starts after the measuring electrodes and the signal electrodes of the bioimpedance measuring device have been connected to the contacts of the measuring standard and a time condition is met.

9. The method according to any claim 1, further comprising: determining a prevailing temperature by a temperature sensor to which at least one of the bioimpedance measuring device and the measuring standard is exposed during the calibration; and taking into account the determined prevailing temperature during the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device is performed by a manufacturer of the bioimpedance measuring device.

11. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: establishing a signal communication between the measuring standard and at least one of the Calibration Database or Pool and the Patient Database; and reading the Calibration Database or Pool by the measuring standard.

12. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: updating, or automatically updating, at least one of the Calibration Database or Pool and the Patient Database.

13. A medical set, comprising: a bioimpedance measuring device; a measuring standard with a plurality of components (X, Y, Z) that may each be adjusted in terms of their respective component value (x1, x2, . . . xm; y1, y2, . . . yn; z1, z2, . . . zo), so that a number |k| of combinations of component values may be set, wherein |k|=m*n*o; a Calibration Database or Pool comprising a number |CDB| of the combinations of component values, wherein the number |CDB| is smaller than the number |K|; a control unit programmed for calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device by using the measuring standard and setting the plurality of components (X, Y, Z) to some or all of the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values from the Calibration Database or Pool, but not by setting more than the number |CDB| combinations of component values; and a Patient Database having a number |PDB| combinations of information, wherein each of the combinations of information comprises: a) one or more patient parameters that characterize a specific patient, wherein the one or more patient parameters are not bioimpedance measuring results; and b) a plurality of bioimpedance measurement results of the specific patient from at least one previous bioimpedance measurement process of the specific patient measured over a frequency range; wherein the control unit is programmed for: determining the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values based on which the bioimpedance measuring results of at least a predetermined part of the number |PDB| combinations of information may be gained using Cole Models or Cole-Cole Plots; and establishing or creating the Calibration Database or Pool comprises the determined number CDB| of the combinations of component values.

14. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for: filtering the Patient Database according to predetermined criteria in order to create the Calibration Database or Pool from the Patient Database, wherein in order to create the Calibration Database or Pool, only the number |CDB| of the combinations of component values thus filtered out of the Patient Database are used.

15. The medical set according to claim 14, wherein the predetermined criteria includes patient age, race, height, weight, or gender.

16. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for comparing calibration results determined when performing the calibrating at different points of time, respectively, to each other and determining deviations from each other.

17. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for automatically performing the calibrating when measuring electrodes and signal electrodes of the bioimpedance measuring devices have been connected to contacts of the measuring standard.

18. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for performing the calibrating after measuring electrodes and signal electrodes of the bioimpedance measuring device have been connected to contacts of the measuring standard and a time condition is met.

19. The medical set according to claim 13, further comprising a temperature sensor, and wherein the control unit is programmed for: determining a prevailing temperature by a temperature sensor to which temperature the bioimpedance measuring device and/or the measuring standard is exposed during the calibration; and taking into account the determined prevailing temperature during calibration.

20. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for: establishing a signal communication between the measuring standard and at least one of the Calibration Database or Pool and the Patient Database; and reading the Calibration Database or Pool by the measuring standard.

21. The medical set according to claim 13, wherein the control unit is programmed for updating or automatically updating at least one of the Calibration Database or Pool and the Patient Database.

22. The medical set according to claim 13, further comprising a bioimpedance measuring device comprising measuring electrodes and signal electrodes, wherein the bioimpedance measuring device is in signal communication with the medical set.

23. A bioimpedance measuring device comprising measuring electrodes and signal electrodes, wherein the bioimpedance measuring device is calibrated by the method according to claim 1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows schematically simplified a Cole Model as referred to in this specification;

(2) FIG. 2 shows a Cole Cole Plot as referred to in this specification;

(3) FIG. 3 shows a measuring standard used in the method according to the invention;

(4) FIG. 4 shows how the bioimpedance measuring device may be calibrated using the measuring standard;

(5) FIG. 5 shows a medical measuring standard according to the invention;

(6) FIG. 6 compares impedance curves gained when using a 3-component Cole Model and when measuring a patient;

(7) FIG. 7 shows a comparison between a curve A of impedance values gained from the Cole Model shown in FIG. 1, a curve B gained from the extended impedance model discussed with respect to FIG. 5 and a curve C gained directly from a real or living, respectively, patient;

(8) FIG. 8 shows a test box for testing a bioimpedance measuring device using differently configured implementations of the extended impedance model discussed with respect to FIG. 5;

(9) FIG. 9 shows in a simplified manner an embodiment of the method for calibrating a bioimpedance measuring device according to the invention; and

(10) FIG. 10 shows in a simplified manner an embodiment of the method for testing a bioimpedance measuring device according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(11) FIG. 1 shows a common modeling of human tissue by electrical components, known as the Cole Model. This model provides a typical (idealized) impedance curve as shown in FIG. 2 when determining the impedance across all frequencies as outlined below. The resistors R.sub.0 and R∞ are purely resistive, i.e., there is no reactance (Im(Z)=0). The impedance with the largest reactance Im(Z) component can be observed at a typical frequency (characteristic frequency ωc or Fc).

(12) Depending on the component values x.sub.1, x.sub.2, . . . x.sub.m; y.sub.1, y.sub.2, . . . y.sub.n; z.sub.1, z.sub.2, . . . z.sub.o and the applied frequency ω, the left-hand module results in a certain point on the a.m. impedance curve. For DC (frequency=0), the capacitance Cm is an interruption, hence the resulting value for the impedance is Z=Re. Thus, in the Cole Cole Plot of FIG. 2 R.sub.0 corresponds to Re. At infinite frequency, the capacitance Cm behaves as a short circuit and hence the resulting value for the impedance becomes the parallel combination of Re and Ri shown in FIG. 1 leading to the Rinf in the Cole Cole plot of FIG. 2.

(13) Each Cole Cole Plot corresponds to a characteristic assembly of the Cole Model with specific component values x.sub.1, x.sub.2, . . . x.sub.m; y.sub.1, y.sub.2, . . . y.sub.n; z.sub.1, z.sub.2, . . . z.sub.o. These are determined from the impedance measurement on the patient and these values are used to calculate patient parameters, such as overhydration, that are important for the prescription.

(14) Bioimpedance measuring devices have to be calibrated. This may be done using measuring standards. Such a measuring standard provides for the components, respectively, known or previously precisely measured component values, which are variable. A measuring standard may, schematically simplified, look like as shown in FIG. 3.

(15) The measuring standard 100 shown in FIG. 3 may have variable components Re, Ri and Cm whose values can be adjusted by the user. Since adjusting the component values has an effect on the impedance to be measured by the bioimpedance measuring device, the measuring standard 100 may also be referred to as a Multi-impedance Box (short: MIB).

(16) The measuring standard 100 essentially embodies the circuit of the Cole Model with selectable component values. There are several ways to design the measuring standard 100 accordingly. For example, components of the measuring standard 100 can be connected to each other via relays. However, the (e.g., electromechanical) relays can be replaced by semiconductor circuits (e. g., transistors, transmission gates, electronic switches). It is also possible that instead of selectable component combinations single specific components of high accuracy are used, the values of which are made known to the calibration system, whereby the set or adjusted impedance Z can be calculated.

(17) The following typical values can be set for the component values in an exemplary embodiment of the measuring standard 100:

(18) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE Measuring standard parameter range Re [Ohm] 249.7 . . . 1207 (32 steps) Ri [Ohm] 714.9 . . . 3058.17 (32 steps) Cm [nF] 0.36 . . . 4.352 (16 steps)

(19) As can be seen from this table, the exemplary measuring standard 100 of FIG. 3 comprises only three components Re, Ri and Cm. These three components may herein be referred to in a more general manner as X, Y, Z. The component values shown in the table as selectable or adjustable for Re, Ri and Cm are, hence, referred to as component values x.sub.1, x.sub.2, . . . x.sub.m; y.sub.1, y.sub.2, . . . y.sub.n; z.sub.1; z.sub.2, . . . z.sub.o with x.sub.1 being 249.7, x.sub.m being 1207, y.sub.1 being 714.9, y.sub.n being 3058.17, z.sub.1 being 0.36 and z.sub.o being 4.352. In the present example, between x.sub.1 and x.sub.m the user can select one of 32 steps (here: m=32), between y.sub.1 and y.sub.n the user can select one of 32 steps (here: n=32) and between z.sub.1 and z.sub.o he can select one of 16 steps (here: o=16). For example, the combination of x.sub.1, y.sub.1, and z.sub.1 could be a first combination K1, the combination of x.sub.1, y.sub.1, and z.sub.2 could be a second combination K2, and so on.

(20) The components values of the table above are typical when assessing or measuring the impedance. In fact, these values may be used to characterize subject specific lumped parameter models that represent the largest possible part of, or even the entire, population.

(21) Running the above-shown adjustable component values through their available value ranges will result in 16384 (“|K|”) selectable component value combinations K (32*32*16=16384), each combination reflecting a different impedance according to the Cole Model. It is noted that since each of the |K| combinations results in a Cole Cole Plot itself as many different Cole Cole Plots may be drawn. Also, it goes without saying that if additional component values were selectably integrated into the measuring standard 100 or MIB, the number of resulting impedances would increase exponentially.

(22) To fully calibrate the bioimpedance measuring device 200 in order to ensure high accuracy when measuring the bioimpedance of any patient, all of these combinations should be set with the measuring standard 100, and a Cole Cole Plot should be recorded for each combination. FIG. 4 shows how the bioimpedance measuring device 200 may be calibrated using the measuring standard 100.

(23) FIG. 4 shows parts of a bioimpedance measuring device 200 comprising a signal generator 201 connected to a measuring standard 100 for the calibrating step.

(24) In FIG. 4, the contacts 101 of the measuring standard 100 are in electrical contact with signal electrodes 203 and measuring electrodes 205, respectively.

(25) The signal generator 201 of the bioimpedance device 200 to be calibrated applies the current I into the measuring standard 100 and varies the frequency of this test signal. The transducer 207 of the bioimpedance measuring device 200 simultaneously measures the voltage V across the measuring standard 100.

(26) Since for contacting the measuring standard 100 the signal electrodes 203 and measuring electrodes 205 of the bioimpedance device 200 are advantageously used, they are also being calibrated.

(27) From the phase shift and/or the ratio of or the relation between the amplitudes of I and V, and from the resulting phase shift between current and voltage, an impedance Z is calculated for the currently set frequency for ω. The same procedure is repeated for as many different frequencies needed to be able to determine a Cole Cole Plot characteristic of the selected component values set at the measuring standard 100 for the calibration. The bioimpedance device 200 is programmed to calculate assumed component values based on these impedance values.

(28) In a next step, the assumed component values are compared with the actual and set component values of the measuring standard 100. Deviations between the assumed component values and the actual and set component values may be used for generating correction data that in turn can be used to calibrate the bioimpedance measuring device 200. For example, such correction data can be stored in a nonvolatile memory of the bioimpedance measuring device. Alternatively, or additionally, correction data can also be kept available via a data connection with the bioimpedance measuring device using a unique device identification feature outside the device itself and retrieved as needed.

(29) Alternatively, variable and/or adjustable components (such as potentiometers, variable capacitances) can also be provided inside the bioimpedance measuring device 200. Their corresponding values may be modified such that there is no longer any difference between component values calculated by the bioimpedance measuring device 200 and the real and actually set component values of the components comprised by the measuring standard 100.

(30) It can be seen from this that the calibration process is complicated, time-consuming and expensive.

(31) However, reducing the number of component value combinations of the measuring standard 100 without waiving safety aspects is possible and suggested by the present disclosure. For example, calibration of a bioimpedance measuring device 200 based on only a limited number of possible component value combinations has been found possible and also reliably by the inventors if, e. g., particularities of patients belonging to a particular population group are observed. For example, this can be achieved by using data from laboratory bioimpedance measurements of a large group of patients, and by classifying the patients in a Patient Databank (PDB) according to suitable criteria, e.g., their weight, gender, race, health state, diseases, and the like.

(32) For example, the Patient Database PDB mentioned herein may comprise patient parameters which may be used to characterize a specific patient (e.g., weight, gender, race, and the like), and also bioimpedance measuring results measured for the specific patient on at least one previous bioimpedance measuring over a frequency range.

(33) Hence, having a particular patient in mind, one might segregate the theoretically possible combinations of component values of the measuring standard 100 into those which will not be of relevance for the particular patient and which do not have to be considered in the calibration process and those which will be of essence and which will have to be considered when calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device 200.

(34) Thus, assessing a Patient Database PDB before calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device 200 as set forth herein makes it possible to classify a variety of combinations of component values of the measuring standard 100 as irrelevant for the following calibration step. Consequently, such combinations do not need to be measured and calibration data need not be created using those combinations. This segregation may significantly shorten the calibration process for a bioimpedance measuring device 200 without the risk of performing uncalibrated measurements later on on real patients.

(35) Obviously, the more entries the PDB has, the more precisely relevant values of bioimpedance measurements can be extracted from the PDB.

(36) Real capacitances are themselves complex impedances, i.e. they include series and/or parallel resistors and inductances, resulting in a frequency-dependent impedance. Hence, in some embodiments, it is provided that this characteristic is also taken into account in the capacitance Cm of the measuring standard 100. Hence, the component values of those components or “sub-components” (their values also being called “sub-component values” here) could in some embodiments made be part of the combinations of component values. It is noted that identifying them (or their size) might be used as further hints towards the real impedance of the patient and/or towards more precise findings regarding the patient if they are acknowledged in the assessment of the patient's condition.

(37) The calibration can be done anytime and repeatedly. Thus, in some embodiments, the bioimpedance measuring device 200 comprises its own measuring standard 100 and may have access to the Patient Database PDB. This access can be advantageously based, e.g., on a secure data connection (e.g., network) to a central entity (e. g., server), for example via any wireless interface, e.g., Wi-Fi peer-to-peer, Bluetooth or infrared interfaces. Using USB sticks or other data carriers is also conceivable and comprised by the present disclosure.

(38) One advantage of such a solution may be that the Patient Database PDB can be constantly updated based on ongoing laboratory measurements of future patients and it may be available during calibration in its most recently updated version. Thus, if there is, for example, an unexpected laboratory measurement of a specific patient, which makes a calibration step based on further combination of component values of the measuring standard 100 necessary, then this can be conveniently initiated “online”, without having to send the bioimpedance measuring device 200 back to the manufacturer for an update.

(39) The measuring standard 100 may be an integral part of the bioimpedance measuring device 200, or may be designed as a stand-alone device that is used for a plurality of bioimpedance measuring devices 200.

(40) It can be envisaged that the bioimpedance measuring device 200 is recalibrated regularly. For this purpose, in particular if the measuring standard 100 and the control unit needed for carrying out the calibration method are an integral part of the bioimpedance measuring device 200, a corresponding message may be output via an output device of the bioimpedance measuring device 200 requesting the user to contact the signal electrodes 203 and the measuring electrodes 205 to each other or to contacts 201 of the measuring standard 100 analogously to FIG. 4. The calibration process is started thereafter.

(41) This provision may be used, for example, to detect defective or overaged components, when the comparison of the results of the current calibration process with results of a previous calibration shows abnormalities. For example, a deviation of the results from the true (or set) component values may exceed a threshold that had not been exceeded during earlier calibration steps. Also, a deviation may be discovered when comparing the present deviation from the true component values with earlier deviations from the true component values.

(42) In some embodiments it can be provided that every time selected electrical contacts provided on the bioimpedance measuring device 200 (e. g., the signal electrodes 203 and/or the measuring electrodes 205) are connected to electrodes 101 of the measuring device 100 (e. g., analogously to what is shown in FIG. 4) the calibration step starts automatically.

(43) In some embodiments, it can be provided that a calibration according to the present disclosure takes place automatically when both the electrodes provided for the calibration process are connected to their corresponding contacts and a time condition is met. For example, the control unit triggering the automatic start of the calibration step may be programmed to start the calibration at a predetermined, settable time of the day (e.g. at night). This embodiment may allow the bioimpedance measuring device 200 to be calibrated at night, or on the weekends, or at any other suitable time when the calibration process does not hamper the use of the device 200. Yet, this way the bioimpedance measuring device 200 may always be found by the user in a perfectly and recently calibrated condition.

(44) In some embodiments, the calibration process may be performed prior to using the bioimpedance measuring device 200 for measuring the bioimpedance of a specific patient. In this case, the calibration process can advantageously be further accelerated if the number of combinations of component values of the measuring standard 100 is further reduced by certain characteristics of the patient (e.g. race, age, height, weight, gender).

(45) Consequently, in some embodiments the Patient Database PDB is indexed to these criteria and can be filtered accordingly. Thus, a kind of “quick test” of the calibration status based on the most relevant component value combinations can be done before using the bioimpedance measuring device for measuring a patient's impedance by calibrating the device only based on some combinations of component values (namely the ones extracted from the Patient Database PDB in the light of the criteria input). It might be provided that if there are relevant differences when compared to a previous “complete calibration”, this then may indicate a problem which may be shown or displayed and corresponding actions (using another bioimpedance measuring device, for example) can be taken. Again, this may increase patient safety.

(46) FIG. 5 shows the basic design of a measuring standard 100 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

(47) The measuring standard 100 according to the present disclosure comprises not only a series circuit of the second resistor Ri1 with the first capacitance Cm1 as already known from FIG. 3 or FIG. 4 but also at least one further series circuit of a third resistor Ri2 with a second capacitance Cm2. The combination of Ri2 and Cm2 is parallel connected to the second resistor Ri1 and the first capacitance Cm1.

(48) Also, as shown in FIG. 5, the measuring standard 100 may comprise further parallel circuits each having or consisting of a series circuit of yet another resistor with yet another capacitance Ri3, Cm3 or Ri4, Cm4, and so on.

(49) Preferably, the measuring standard 100 comprises two (Ri2, Cm2, Ri3, Cm3) and particularly preferably three further parallel connected series circuits of a resistor with a capacitance (Ri2, Cm2, Ri3, Cm3, Ri4, Cm4) each.

(50) Exemplary component values of the components shown in FIG. 5 that may be characteristic for a particular patient, can be as follows:

(51) Re=511 Ohm; Ri1=5110 Ohm; Ri2=28700 Ohm; Ri3=3010 Ohm; Ri4=3010 Ohm; Cm1=0.1 nF; Cm2=1.5 nF; Cm3=0.47 nF; Cm4=2.2 nF

(52) This combination of component values thus simulates a specific patient by a model called the extended impedance model herein. This extended impedance model is reflected by the design shown in FIG. 5. Other values may be specific for other patients. The values selected for the components are determined experimentally. For this purpose, a patient may be measured with a calibrated bioimpedance measuring device 200 and an impedance curve may be recorded.

(53) Subsequently, the component values of the extended impedance model may be determined using mathematical methods, which result in the most exact possible match with the measure of values (curve fitting, least square, and the like).

(54) As has been stated above, the Cole Model discussed with regard to FIG. 1 is used in practice in order to simulate the impedance of the human body, and findings regarding the human body (overhydration, hydration status, fluid volume, lean tissue, fat tissue, and so on) are derived from the Cole Model and from Cole Cole Plots drawn based on the Cole Model.

(55) It has been observed that impedance curves resulting from the extended impedance model shown in FIG. 5 match better with the real measurements on patients than curves gained from the basic Cole Model shown in FIG. 1 and discussed with respect to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4.

(56) The divergence between the results gained from the Cole Model of FIG. 1 and the practice is indicated in FIG. 6.

(57) An optional temperature sensor 103 may be provided.

(58) FIG. 6 shows that while using the known 3-component Cole Model results in a perfect semicircle in the impedance plane (left), the reality (values measured on a patient) is reflected in a compressed circular arc (right). The effect of the compressed circular arc is represented by the extended impedance model according to the present disclosure as exemplarily shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 7 shows the difference.

(59) FIG. 7 shows a comparison between a curve A of impedance values gained from the known Cole Model shown in FIG. 1, a curve B gained from the extended impedance model shown in FIG. 5 and a curve C gained directly from a real patient.

(60) As can be seen from FIG. 7, the results gained from the extended impedance model shown in FIG. 5 (curve B) are much closer to the real values derived from the patient in question (curve C).

(61) Hence, the use of the extended impedance model shown in FIG. 5 results in a much better match with reality.

(62) The extended impedance model makes it possible to test bioimpedance measuring devices 200 under more realistic conditions without the need to measure real patients. In contrast to measurements on patients, the measurement with the extended impedance model shown in FIG. 5 is reproducible and accurate at all times.

(63) Thus, the extended impedance model is well suited for quality control of bioimpedance measuring devices 200.

(64) FIG. 8 shows that differently configured implementations of the extended impedance model according to the present disclosure (see, e.g., FIG. 5) can be selected in a test box 300.

(65) The test box 300 may comprise more than one measuring standard 100 (here: three) whose adjustable component values (Re, Ri1, Ri2, Cm1, Cm2, . . . ) are set to different predetermined values.

(66) A bioimpedance measuring device 200 to be tested is connected to the test box 300 (as in FIG. 4), the controlling computer 400 successively selects the implementation simulating a specific real patient (e.g., Patients P1, P2, P3), and the bioimpedance measuring device 200 records an impedance curve for each of the simulated Patients P1, P2 and P3, respectively.

(67) The thus gained impedance curve is compared (by the computer 400, for example) with the reference curve resulting from the respective connection, whereby statements about the measurement accuracy and thus realistic quality control are possible.

(68) In some embodiments, the extended impedance model is used in the same way as described above for the calibration of the bioimpedance measuring device 200 using the known Cole Model.

(69) FIG. 9 shows in a simplified manner an embodiment of the method for calibrating a bioimpedance measuring device according to the invention.

(70) The method encompasses in a first step S1 providing a bioimpedance measuring device 200.

(71) In another step S2 it encompasses providing a measuring standard with a plurality of components (X, Y, Z), which may each be set or adjusted automatically and/or by a user in terms of their component characteristic or their component value (x.sub.1, x.sub.2, . . . x.sub.m; y.sub.1, y.sub.2, . . . y.sub.n; z.sub.1, z.sub.2, . . . z.sub.o), so that a number (|K|=m*n*o) of combinations K of component values may be set or adjusted at the measuring standard automatically and/or by the user.

(72) The method also encompasses in a step S3 providing a Calibration Database or Pool (CDB), wherein the Calibration Database or Pool (CDB) comprises |CDB| combinations or sets of components values, wherein |CDB| is smaller than |K|.

(73) The method also encompasses further in a step S4 calibrating the bioimpedance measuring device by using the measuring standard and setting some or each of the |CDB| combinations of component values from the Calibration Database or Pool (CDB) at the measuring standard, but not by setting or adjusting more than the |CDB| combinations.

(74) FIG. 10 shows in a simplified manner an embodiment of the method according to the invention for testing a bioimpedance measuring device.

(75) The method encompasses in a step S1 providing a bioimpedance measuring device 200.

(76) The method encompasses in a step S2 providing at least one medical measuring standard and setting the adjustable component values of the measuring standard to predetermined values.

(77) The method encompasses in a step S3 connecting the bioimpedance measuring device with the electrodes of the measuring standard.

(78) The method encompasses in a step S4 assuming or determining component values of the medical measuring standard by the bioimpedance measuring device.

(79) The method encompasses in a step S5 comparing the assumed component values with the set component values and evaluating the result of the comparison.

(80) It is noted that the medical measuring standard according to the present disclosure discussed supra and exemplarily shown in FIG. 5 is a 5-path arrangement (having 5 parallel current paths) by way of example and merely illustrative. Indeed, fewer than or more than five paths may also be considered for the medical measuring standard suggested by the present disclosure.

(81) Also, some or all of the several parallel paths may be identical to each other (i. e., comprise same components or be a repetition of the same structure or combination) or different from each other (i.e., comprise at least one component that is not comprised by each of the parallel paths, or be different structures of combinations).

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

(82) 100 (medical) measuring standard 101 contacts 103 temperature sensor X, Y, Z components x.sub.1, x.sub.2, . . . x.sub.m; component values of component X y.sub.1, y.sub.2, . . . y.sub.n; component values of component Y z.sub.1, z.sub.2, . . . z.sub.o component values of component Z A curve B curve C curve CDB Calibration Database or Pool |CDB| number of combinations comprised in the CDB PDB Patient Database |PDB| number of combinations comprised in the PDB P1, P2, P3 patient 200 bioimpedance measuring device 201 signal generator 203 signal electrodes 205 measuring electrodes 207 transducer 300 test box 400 controlling computer