A METHOD FOR CO-PRODUCING MONOPHENOLS AND CELLULOSE BY CATALYTIC OXIDATION OF BIOMASS OVER A TRANSITION METAL OXIDE

Abstract

A method for co-production of monophenols and cellulose by transition metal oxide catalytic oxidation of biomass is disclosed. The method uses transition metal oxide as catalyst and pretreated dry biomass as raw material to obtain high purity and selectivity of monophenolic chemicals with co-produced cellulose under mild conditions.

Claims

1. A method for co-production of monophenols and cellulose by transition metal oxide catalytic oxidation of biomass, comprising: (a) loading a reactor with pretreated dry biomass, transition metal oxide and alkali metal hydroxide solution and then the reactor is sealed, evacuated and refilled with O.sub.2, the O.sub.2 pressure being kept at 0.1˜3 MPa, and the mixture is allowed to react at 80˜200° C. for 1˜180 min under stirring, and then cooled down at room temperature to obtain a suspension; (b) the suspension obtained in step (a) is centrifuged to separate clear supernatant from solid residue, the supernatant being acidified to pH 2˜3, an organic solvent being added to the acidified solution to extract phenolic compounds and the organic phase being gathered; the residual acid and water in the organic solution are removed and monophenols are obtained by vacuum distillation of the organic phase; and (c) the solid residue obtained in step (b) is placed in a sieve, and the catalyst is rinsed out with water while the biomass residue is retained on the sieve, the aqueous solution containing catalyst is filtered or centrifuged to recycle the spent catalyst, the biomass residue is washed with acid aqueous solution to remove the residual catalyst until the solution is clear, and continuedly washed with water until the pH value of waste liquid reaches 7 and then the biomass residue is dried.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the dry biomass is lignocellulosic biomass, and wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is selected from a group consisting of hardwood, softwood, grass and agro-forestry residue.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pretreatment of dry biomass comprising treatment of the biomass with anhydrous ethanol and refluxing for 8 h, then dried at 50˜60° C.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the alkali metal hydroxide is selected from a group consisting of NaOH, KOH and Mg(OH).sub.2.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the solid-liquid ratio of dry biomass to aqueous solution of hydroxide of alkali metal is 1:20˜50.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the transition metal oxide is selected from a group consisting of CuO, TiO.sub.2, NiO, Co.sub.2O.sub.3, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, Fe.sub.3O.sub.4 and ZnO.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the transition metal oxide is CuO nanoparticles.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the particle size of CuO nanoparticles is 40˜200 nm.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the content of CuO nanoparticles is 20˜40% of the weight of the dry biomass.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction temperature is 120˜180° C.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the stirring speed is 50˜1000 rpm.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction time is 10˜120 min.

13. The method of claim 4, wherein the concentration of alkali metal hydroxide aqueous solution is 2.5˜15 wt %.

14. The method of claim 6, wherein the content of transition metal oxide is 1˜100% of the weight of the dry biomass.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0023] The present invention as will be described in detail below should not to be understood to be limited to the particular methodologies.

[0024] The equipment and materials mentioned in the present invention are commercially available, unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise specified, the percent sign “%” referred to in the present invention refers to the weight percentage.

[0025] The yield and selectivity of monophenol, yield and purity of cellulose are calculated by the following formula.

Yield of monophenol=(weight of monophenol/weight of lignin in pine)×100%

Selectivity of aromatic aldehyde=(weight of aromatic aldehyde/weight of all monophenols)×100%

Yield of cellulose=(weight of cellulose retained/weight of cellulose in pine)×100%

Selectivity of cellulose=(weight of cellulose retained/weight of biomass residue)×100%

EXAMPLE 1

[0026] A method for co-production of monophenol compounds and cellulose by transition metal oxide catalytic oxidation of biomass is provided in this example. The method has the following steps.

[0027] (a) In a 50 mL autoclave reactor, 0.5 g of pretreated dry pine powder, 0.1 g (the weight of 20% of biomass) of 40 nm CuO, 25 mL of NaOH aqueous solution of 7.5%, were put into the reaction vessel and then sealed. The reactor was evacuated and refilled with O.sub.2, the O.sub.2 pressure was kept at 1 MPa. The reaction mixture was heated at 160° C. for 60 min under stirring speed of 400 rpm. After cooled down at room temperature, the reactor was open and a suspension was obtained.

[0028] (b) The suspension obtained in step (a) was centrifuged to separate clear supernatant and solid residue. The supernatant was acidified with hydrochloric acid (36% aqueous solution) until pH value was 2˜3. Dichloromethane was added to the acidified solution to extract phenolic compounds. The dichloromethane phase was gathered. NaHCO.sub.3 was added into dichloromethane solution to neutralize residue hydrochloric acid, and then Na.sub.2SO.sub.4 was added to remove the remaining water. Finally, monophenols was obtained by vacuum distillation of the dichloromethane phase.

[0029] (c) The solid residue obtained in step (b) was placed in a sieve of 800 meshes, and the catalyst was rinsed out with water while the biomass residue retained on the sieve. The aqueous solution containing catalyst was filtered or centrifuged to obtain the spent catalyst, and the spent catalyst can be used in the next batch. The biomass residue was washed with hydrochloric acid aqueous solution to remove the residual catalyst until the solution clear, continue washed with water until the pH value of waste liquid reached 7. Finally, the biomass residue was dried.

[0030] The yield, selectivity and purity of products are listed in Table 1.

EXAMPLES 2 TO 5

[0031] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that the catalyst 40 nm CuO was replaced with 50 nm TiO.sub.2, 20 nm Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, 50 nm ZnO and 20 nm Al.sub.2O.sub.3. The yield, selectivity and purity of products are listed in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Results of catalytic oxidation of pine over different metal oxides. Yield of Selectivity Yield of Purity of monophenols of vanillin cellulose cellulose Examples Catalyst (%) (%) (%) (%) Example 1 40 nm CuO 36 73 80 95 Example 2 50 nm TiO.sub.2 22 70 48 95 Example 3 20 nm 17 72 30 92 Example 4 50 nm ZnO 18 71 35 98 Example 5 20 nm 21 70 50 96

[0032] It can be seen in Table 1 that all the selected transition metal oxides can catalyze the oxidation of biomass to monophenols and retain a portion of cellulose. Compared with other metal oxides, the nano CuO exhibits superior performance in catalytic oxidation of pine to produce monophenols and co-production of high-purity cellulose.

EXAMPLES 6 TO 8

[0033] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that the catalyst 40 nm CuO was replaced with 200 nm CuO, 10 μm CuO and 75 μm CuO. The yield, selectivity and purity of products are listed in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Results of catalytic oxidation of pine over CuO with different particle sizes. Yield of Selectivity Yield of Purity of monophenols of vanillin cellulose cellulose Examples Catalyst (%) (%) (%) (%) Example l  40 nm CuO 36 73 80 95 Example 6 200 nm 32 75 75 95 Example 7  10 μm 26 72 62 95 Example 8  75 μm 25 70 60 94

[0034] It can be seen in Table 2 that the yield of monophenols and cellulose increases gradually as the particle size of CuO particles decreases, and the 40 nm CuO shows the best catalytic activity.

EXAMPLES 9 TO 12

[0035] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that the dosage of 40 nm CuO was changed to 10%, 40%, 60% and 80% of the dosage of biomass. The yield, selectivity and purity of the products are shown in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Results of catalytic oxidation of pine over 40 nm CuO with different dosage. Purity Dosage 40 Yield of Selectivity Yield of of nm CuO monophenols of vanillin cellulose cellulose Examples (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Example 1 20 36 73 80 95 Example 9 10 31 76 65 98 Example 10 40 25 73 68 97 Example 11 60 22 74 68 92 Example 12 80 18 75 65 93

[0036] As can be seen in Table 3, the yields of monophenols and cellulose increases and then decreases with the increase of the dosage of 40 nm CuO, and the best catalytic performance is achieved at the dosage of 20%.

EXAMPLES 13 TO 14

[0037] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that the catalyst 40 nm CuO was replaced by catalyst reused at the second time and third time. The yield, selectivity and purity of the products are shown in Table 4.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Results of catalytic oxidation of pine over 40 nm CuO. Yield of Selectivity Yield of Purity of 40 nm CuO monophenols of vanillin cellulose cellulose Example used time (%) (%) (%) (%) Example 1 First time 36 73 80 95 Example 13 Second time 30 76 78 98 Example 14 Third time 29 77 76 97

[0038] As can be seen in Table 4, nano CuO shows no obvious reduction of catalytic activity after three recycles, indicating its high reusability.

EXAMPLES 15 TO 19

[0039] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that the biomass pine was replaced by eucalyptus, Chinese pennisetum, bagasse, corn stalk, furfural residue of corn stalk. The yield, selectivity and purity of the products are shown in Table 5.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Results of catalytic oxidation of different biomass over 40 nm CuO. Selectivity Yield Selectivity Selectivity of Yield Purity of of of p-hydroxy of of monophenols vanillin syringaldehyde benzaldehyde cellulose cellulose Examples Biomass (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Example 1 pine 36 73 0 0 80 95 Examp eucalypt 46 24 66 0 80 98 Examp Chinese 25 40 25 11 90 97 Examp bagasse 20 37 25 15 40 96 Example 18 corn stalk 15 50 20 15 40 95 Example 19 furfural 10 30 20 12 10 92 residue indicates data missing or illegible when filed

[0040] As can be seen in Table 5, nano CuO is efficient in catalyze oxidation of various biomasses to monophenols with aromatic aldehydes as main product and co-producing high-purity cellulose. Among the biomasses, the highest yield of monophnol achieves when eucalyptus is used as raw material, while Chinese pennisetum gives the highest yield of cellulose.

EXAMPLE 20

[0041] The preparation process is substantially the same as Example 1, except that step (a) was modified as follows: In a 50 mL autoclave reactor, 0.5 g of pretreated dry pine powder, 0.2 g (the weight of 40% of biomass) of 40 nm CuO, 25 mL of NaOH aqueous solution of 2.5%, were put into the reaction vessel and then sealed. The reactor was evacuated and refilled with O.sub.2, the O.sub.2 pressure was kept at 0.5 MPa. The reaction mixture was heated at 120° C. for 120 min under stirring speed of 50 rpm. After cooled down at room temperature, the reactor was open and a suspension was obtained. The yield of monophenols was 15%, selectivity of vanillin was 72%; and the yield and purity of cellulose was 85% and 81%, respectively.

EXAMPLE 21

[0042] The preparation process is substantially the same as the example 1, except that step (a) was modified as follows: In a 50 mL autoclave reactor, 0.5 g of pretreated dry pine powder, 0.1 g (the weight of 20% of biomass) of 40 nm CuO, 10 mL of NaOH aqueous solution of 15%, were put into the reaction vessel and then sealed. The reactor was evacuated and refilled with O.sub.2, the O.sub.2 pressure was kept at 1.5 MPa. The reaction mixture was heated at 180° C. for 10 min under stirring speed of 1000 rpm. After cooled down at room temperature, the reactor was open and a suspension was obtained. The yield of monophenols was 25%, selectivity of vanillin was 70%; and the yield and purity of cellulose was 60% and 74%, respectively.

[0043] While the specification has described in detail in certain exemplary examples, the description of the above examples is intended only to facilitate the understanding of the technical protocol of the invention and its spirit. It will be appreciated that those skilled in the art, upon attaining an understanding of the foregoing, may readily conceive of alterations to, modification of, and equivalents to these examples. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the alterations, modification and equivalents of examples of the present patent is to be controlled by the limitations set forth in the claims and any equivalents thereof.