Plasterboard with Improved Nail Pull Resistance
20240034692 ยท 2024-02-01
Assignee
Inventors
- Stergios Karakoussis (Laubach, DE)
- Georgi Paraskov (Neustadt an der Aisch, DE)
- Alexander Hartmann (Kleinlangheim, DE)
- Carlo Knauf (Weigenheim, DE)
- Anton Peter (Wuerzburg, DE)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The present invention is concerned with plasterboards including at least two layers A and B of different composition, wherein layer A includes a calcium sulfate binder and a synthetic polymer foam and the layer B includes a calcium sulfate binder and a surfactant foam and wherein the at least one layer A is a surface layer. Improved nail pull resistance can be achieved in lightweight plasterboards, if foamed synthetic polymer is present in a surface layer. The present invention further concerns a method for the production of corresponding products, an apparatus for the production of such products as well as the use of synthetic polymer foam in a surface layer to produce plasterboards with high nail pull resistance at a minimal amount of synthetic polymer.
Claims
1. A plasterboard comprising at least two layers A and B of different composition, wherein layer A comprises a calcium sulfate binder and a synthetic polymer foam and the layer B comprises a calcium sulfate binder and a surfactant foam and wherein the at least one layer A is a surface layer.
2. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the synthetic polymer foam comprises at least vinyl polymers and/or melamine polymers, particularly at least one selected from the group of polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, melamine formaldehyde, or combinations thereof.
3. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the synthetic polymer foam of layer A comprises 0.2 to 5 wt.-%, preferably 0.4 to 3.5 wt.-%, most preferably 0.5 to 2.0 wt.-% of a synthetic polymer on a dry basis, relative to the calcium sulfate binder.
4. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the layer A makes up 40% or less of the thickness of the plasterboard, preferably the layer A makes up 5% to 40% of the thickness of the plasterboard.
5. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the density of the layers A and B differs by at most 100 kg/m.sup.3.
6. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the layer A has a density in the range of 350 to 1200 kg/m.sup.3, preferably 350 to 700 kg/m.sup.3 and/or the layer B has a density in the range of from of 350 to 1200 kg/m.sup.3, preferably 350 to 700 kg/m.sup.3.
7. The plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the layer A contains less surfactant foam than the layer B, preferably the layer A does not contain any surfactant foam.
8. A wall structure, comprising at least one plasterboard according to claim 1, wherein the plasterboard is mounted to at least one stud and wherein the plasterboard is positioned within the wall structure such that the at least one layer A of the plasterboard faces the interior of a room.
9. A method for the production of a plasterboard comprising the steps: (i) preparing a synthetic polymer foam in a first foaming device and preparing a surfactant foam in a second foaming device, (ii) preparing a calcium sulfate mixture comprising stucco, water and optional additives in a mixer, (iii) admixing the synthetic polymer foam to a part of the mixture prepared in the mixer to form a first slurry for a layer A, (iv) admixing the surfactant foam to another part of the mixture prepared in the mixer to form a second slurry for layer B, (v) depositing the first slurry from a first discharging device onto a substrate to provide a layer A, (vi) and depositing the second slurry from a second discharging device onto the first slurry forming layer A to provide a layer B.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein in step (iii) additionally part of the surfactant foam is admixed to the mixture to form the first slurry for the layer A.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the amount of surfactant foam admixed to the first slurry for layer A is smaller than the amount of surfactant foam admixed to the second slurry for layer B, preferably the amount of surfactant foam is quantified as 0.01-1.0 wt.-% active ingredients relative to the calcium sulfate binder.
12. An apparatus for producing a plasterboard said apparatus comprising a first foaming device for producing a synthetic polymer foam and a second foaming device for producing a surfactant foam, and at least one mixer, a first and a second discharging device, wherein the first foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device, and the second foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the second discharging device and wherein the first and the second discharging device are spaced apart spatially such that a first slurry from the first discharging device comprising the synthetic polymer foam is dispensed upstream of a second slurry of the second discharging device comprising the surfactant foam.
13. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the second foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device and the second discharging device.
14. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the apparatus comprises a first and a second mixer, the first mixer having a first discharging device and the second mixer having a second discharging device and wherein the first foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device via the first mixer and/or the second foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the second discharging device via the second mixer.
15. The apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the first foaming device is connected directly to the first discharging device and/or the second foaming device is connected directly to the second discharging device.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] In the following, the invention will be illustrated in detail by aid of non-limiting, exemplary embodiments in
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0037] In a further aspect, the invention is concerned with a method for the production of a plasterboard, preferably a plasterboard as described above, comprising the steps: [0038] (i) preparing a synthetic polymer foam in a first foaming device and preparing a surfactant foam in a second foaming device, [0039] (ii) preparing a calcium sulfate mixture comprising stucco, water and optional additives in a mixer 3, 4, [0040] (iii) admixing the synthetic polymer foam to a part of the mixture prepared in the mixer 3, 4 to form a first slurry for layer A, [0041] (iv) admixing the surfactant foam to another part of the mixture prepared in a mixer 4 to form a second slurry for layer B, [0042] (v) depositing the first slurry from a first discharging device 5, 5a, 50, 50a onto a substrate to provide a layer A, [0043] (vi) and depositing the second slurry from a second discharging device 6 onto the first slurry to provide a layer B,
[0044] The substrate in in step (v) can be a liner.
[0045] In addition thereto, part of the surfactant foam in step (iii) can be admixed to the mixture to form the first slurry for the layer A. Preferably, the surfactant foam admixed to the first slurry for layer A is smaller than the amount of surfactant foam admixed to the second slurry for layer B. More preferably, the amount of surfactant foam is quantified as 0.01 to 1.0 wt.-% active ingredients, relative to the calcium sulfate binder.
[0046] In most cases, the first slurry will be used to form a surface layer (A) and could thus be considered a surface slurry. Similarly, the second slurry will generally be used to produce a core layer (B) and could thus be considered a core slurry. The core layer is considered a core because it generally has the largest thickness (as well as the largest volume), irrespective of whether it is covered by only one or two surface layers.
[0047] In this method, the synthetic polymer foam in step (i) preferably has a density of 70 to 250 g/L, more preferably of 100 to 200 g/L.
[0048] In a yet further aspect, the invention concerns an apparatus, preferably for implementing a method as described above, wherein said apparatus has the means to apply two mixtures of different composition onto a moving substrate such that one of the mixtures is applied onto the substrate first and the other mixture is subsequently applied onto the first mixture to form a two layered product having at least one surface layer A and a core layer B. The corresponding apparatus comprises a first foaming device 1 for producing a synthetic polymer foam and a second foaming device 2 for producing a surfactant foam. It further comprises at least one mixer 3, 4 for producing a mixture comprising at least stucco and water. The synthetic polymer foam is admixed to the mixture of mixer 3, 4 to form a first slurry and the surfactant foam is admixed to the mixture of mixer 4 to form a second slurry and optionally the first slurry is supplemented with surfactant foam. The apparatus further comprises a first discharging device 5, 5a, 50, 50a for dispensing the first slurry onto a substrate, preferably onto a liner. It also comprises a second discharging device 6 for dispensing the second slurry onto the first slurry. The first foaming device 1 of this apparatus is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device 5, 5a, 50, 50a, and the second foaming device 2 is fluidly interconnected to the second discharging device 6, optionally the second foaming device is further fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device. Furthermore, the first discharging device 5, 5a, 50, 50a and the second discharging device 6 are spaced apart spatially such that the first slurry from the first discharging device 5, 5a, 50, 50a comprising a synthetic polymer foam 15, 15a is dispensed upstream of the second slurry of the second discharging device 6 comprising the surfactant foam 16.
[0049] The term fluidly interconnected denotes that a fluid, such as for example a foam, is able to flow from one component to another, but the two components are not necessarily adjacent and/or need not be directly connected to one another. Instead, they may be separated by other components. For example, a conduit (or duct) and/or a first mixer can be situated between the first foaming device and the first discharge device, if these two are fluidly interconnected. Alternatively, or in addition thereto, a conduit (or duct) and/or a second mixer can be situated between the second foaming device and the second mixer. More explicitly, this means that a synthetic polymer foam is created in a first foaming device. From there it travels to a first discharging device via a conduit or it travels to a first discharging device via a conduit and a first mixer. If the synthetic polymer foam does not travel via a first mixer, it is mixed with a slurry received from a second mixer. This mixing can occur in the first discharge device. Alternatively, it could also circumvent a first mixer and be mixed with the slurry of the first mixer in the discharge device. In all alternatives, the first foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device. Similarly, the surfactant foam that is created in the second foaming device can travel from there to a second discharge device via a conduit or via a conduit and a second mixer. If the surfactant foam does not enter a mixer, the mixing of the surfactant foam with a slurry can take place in the second discharge device. Again, the second foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the second discharging device in both alternatives. The term directly connected denotes that the two components are adjacent to one another. It further denotes that the two components may only be separated by minor components that are not explicitly mentioned in this disclosure such as e.g. connecting pieces, valves etc.
[0050] A typical plasterboard manufacture involves mixing the solid components including calcium sulfate hemihydrate (stucco) with water in a mixer to form a slurry. Liquid additives are generally introduced into this mixer. Foam can be introduced into the mixer or after leaving the mixer, sometimes even both in the mixer and after leaving the mixer. As the action of a mixer can destroy some of the foam, foam is frequently incorporated downstream of the mixer.
[0051] A plasterboard according to the invention can be two-layered, three-layered or comprise more than three layers. Apparatus embodiments for two- and three-layered plasterboards are presented.
[0052] In a preferred embodiment, the first foaming device 1 of the apparatus described above is fluidly interconnected to the first discharging device 5, 5a via a first mixer 3 and/or the second foaming device is fluidly interconnected to the second discharging device via a second mixer 4. Alternatively, or in addition thereto, the first foaming device 1 can be connected directly to the first discharging device 50, 50a and/or the second foaming device can be connected directly to the second discharging device. Foam can be added to the slurry in a mixer or admixed in one of the discharging devices. If foam is added to the slurry in a discharging device, the discharging device generally comprises a device or structure that will promote the mixing of the foam with the slurry.
[0053] Preferably, at least one of the foaming devices 1 and 2 is a stick mixer.
[0054] Further, it is possible that the inventive apparatus can have a levelling means such as a rotating roll 8, by which the thickness of a first slurry 15, 15a for layer A on a substrate, can be spread and adjusted before the second slurry 16 for layer B is applied onto the layer A 15 or the layer A 15a is applied onto the second slurry 16.
[0055] After the plasterboard ribbon has been formed and separated into individual boards, the boards are dried in a dryer (not shown).
[0056] In the following, the inventive apparatus and process will be illustrated in more detail with reference to
[0057] The apparatus in
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061] Various combinations of individual features of the embodiments described in the figures are also possible. For example, part of the synthetic polymer foam can enter a mixer 3 and the other part can be introduced into the first discharging device 5, 5a. Similarly, part of the surfactant foam can be introduced into a mixer 4, while the other part of the surfactant foam can be introduced into the second discharging device 6.
[0062] In yet another not explicitly depicted combination, the synthetic polymer foam can be produced in the first foaming device 1, guided to the first mixer 3 via a first conduit 13 and exit the first mixer 3 into a first discharging device. At the same time, the surfactant foam can be routed from the second foaming device 2 to the second conduit 14 and directly to the second discharging device 6, without entering the second mixer. Vice versa, the synthetic polymer foam can circumvent the first mixer 3 and be guided directly to the first discharging device 5, 5a, while the surfactant foam or at least part of the surfactant foam enters the second mixer 4 before exiting into the second discharging device 6. If, as e.g. in
[0063] In a final aspect, the invention concerns the use of a synthetic polymer foam for the preparation of at least one surface layer A of a plasterboard to obtain a nail pull resistance of at least 240 N, as determined by ASTM C473:2010. Preferably, the synthetic polymer foam is not used in layer B.
[0064] In the above, any preferred or particularly suitable embodiments, which have been described in connection with one aspect, are also applicable to all other aspects of the invention, unless that combination is in clear contradiction to that aspect. Thus, all such combinations are encompassed by and deemed as described in invention, even if this is not explicitly indicated.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Investigation of the Effect of Surfactant and Synthetic Polymer Foams on the Physical Characteristics of Gypsum Boards
[0065] Test prisms with dimensions of 4416 cm, were produced by formulating and mixing the compositions as shown in Table 1, pouring them into respective molds and allowing them to set and drying them to a constant weight. The respective characteristics of flexural strength, compressive strength and surface hardness were assessed according to DIN EN 13279-2:2004.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sample 4 Sample 2 Sample 3 With 1.85 wt.-% With With 1.85 wt.-% synthetic Sample 1 surfactant foam synthetic polymer.sup.1 Without (foamed to a polymer.sup.1 (foamed to a additive density of 70 g/L) (unfoamed) density of 180 g/L) Stucco [g] 740 740 740 740 Water [g] 440 440 416.7 416.7 Synthetic 0 0 37 37 polymer emulsion [g] Surfactant [g].sup.3 0 18 0 0 Characteristics Volumetric 1167 869 1144 1022 weight [kg/m.sup.3] Flexural 3.46 2.68 4.04 3.94 strength.sup.4 [N/mm.sup.2] Compressive 14.18 5.32 10.7 12.9 strength.sup.4 [N/mm]] Surface 25.1 9.3 16.6 18.2 hardness.sup.4 [N/mm.sup.2] .sup.1=synthetic polymer solid matter based on the weight of the stucco; .sup.2 = the synthetic polymer emulsion has a solids content of 37%, with the remaining 63% being water; by adding the water content of the emulsion to the total water content, all samples were prepared with 440 g water; .sup.3= the surfactant in Sample 2 contained 35% active ingredients; .sup.4= determined according to DIN EN 13279-2: 2004
[0066] As is apparent from the above table, a compact plasterboard has the best surface hardness and compressive strength, but also the highest volumetric weight (Sample 1). If the product is formulated with a foam, the volumetric weight can significantly be reduced, but this is at the expense of a significantly decline in physical characteristics (Sample 2). Incorporating a synthetic polymer (Sample 3) provides a similar volumetric weight and improves the flexural strength, while ensuring a compressive strength and surface hardness that lie in between those of Samples 1 and 2. If the synthetic polymer is foamed, the flexural strength is not significantly affected, while the volumetric weight can be reduced significantly. Surprisingly, the compressive strength and surface hardness of Sample 4 are equivalent or even somewhat higher to those of Sample 3 with the same amount of non-foamed synthetic polymer.
Example 2: Assessment of the Nail Pull Resistance of Test Boards Prepared with Foams from Synthetic Polymer and Surfactants
[0067] Table 2 below shows the composition of plasterboard test samples (12.5 mm40 cm30 cm):
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Surfactant Synthetic polymer Synthetic polymer foam (foamed foam (foamed foam (foamed to a density to a density to a density of 113 g/L) of 180 g/L) of 120 g/L) Stucco [kg] 14 14 14 Water [L] 9.9 9.9 9.9 W/S ratio.sup.1 0.71 0.71 0.71 Accelerator [kg] 0.02 0.02 0.02 Liquefier [kg] 0.06 0.06 0.06 Volume of added 12.35 12.89 12.35 foam [L] Surfactant [ml].sup.2 35 0 0 PVAc 0 0.223 0.577 emulsion [kg].sup.3 .sup.1= water-to-stucco-ratio; .sup.2= 35% active ingredients; .sup.3= 37% solids content
[0068] The plasterboard test boards were covered by two non-woven fiber mat liners instead of the typically used high grammage paper liners. The thus prepared test boards were subjected to the nail pull test according to ASTM C473 (2010). The nail pull test is a measure of the force required to pull a plasterboard off a wall by forcing a fastening nail through the panel. The reported value for Nail Pull Resistance is the maximum stress achieved while the head penetrates through the board surface and core. The characteristics of the test samples and results of these investigations, which included three measurements each, are shown in Table 3 below:
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Sample 6 Sample 7 Synthetic polymer Synthetic polymer Sample 5 foam (foamed foam (foamed Surfactant to a density to a density foam of 180 g/L) of 120 g/L) Thickness of test 14.2 13.8 13.9 board [mm] Volumetric weight 586 574 580 [kg/m.sup.3] wt.-% of surfactant 0.09 wt.-% 0.67 wt.-% 1.51 wt.-% active ingredients/ wt.-% of synthetic polymer solid matter based on weight of stucco Nail pull [N] 234 17 257 11 294 28
[0069] As is apparent from Table 3, the boards prepared with synthetic polymer instead of surfactant foam had about the same dry weight. However, the boards prepared using a synthetic polymer foam showed a significantly higher nail pull resistance. An increase in the amount of synthetic polymer from about 0.7 wt.-% to about 1.5 wt.-% of synthetic polymer solid matter based on the weight of the stucco further improved the nail pull resistance.
[0070] The results in both Examples 1 and 2 show that a synthetic polymer foam plasterboard has improved nail pull resistance relative to plasterboards prepared with surfactant foams. If the synthetic polymer foam based gypsum composition is used to prepare only the surface layer of a gypsum board, the amount of synthetic polymer necessary to prepare corresponding boards can be significantly decreased (e.g. to 30%, if the thickness of the synthetic polymer foam based gypsum layer is about 30% of the whole thickness of the board), without significant loss in the nail pull resistance performance.
Example 3: Assessment of the Nail Pull Resistance of Test Specimen Prepared with Foams from a Synthetic Polymer, Surfactants or Both
[0071] Further nail pull resistance measurements according to ASTM C473:2010 were carried out for 20 cm20 cm1.2 cm test specimen. The results are shown in Tables 5 to 7. Analogous to Samples 5 to 7, these plasterboard test specimen were covered by two non-woven fiber mat liners instead of the typically used high grammage paper liners. Samples 8 and also layers B (8 mm to 10 mm thick) of Samples 10 were production castings. The stucco slurry containing the synthetic polymer foam was prepared analogously on the laboratory scale. Different volumetric weights originated from different mixing times, where foam could be partially destructed by extending the mixing time. The target thickness for all test specimen was 12.5 mm. Layer A of Samples 10 was 2.5 mm to 4.5 mm thick. The main components of all stucco slurries used in Samples 8 to 10 are listed in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Sample 8.sup.3 Sample 8.sup.4 Sample 9 One layered One layered One layered sample; sample; sample; Sample 10.sup.5 surfactant surfactant synthetic polymer Two-layered foam (foamed foam (foamed foam (foamed sample to a density of to a density of to a density of (layer A/ 135 g/L) 135 g/L) 100 g/L) layer B) W/S ratio.sup.1 0.685 0.688 0.678 0.678/0.685- 0.688 Accelerator 1.4 1.0 0.3 0.3/1.0- [wt.-%].sup.2 1.4 Liquefier [wt.-%].sup.2 0.2 0.15 0.12 0.12/0.15- 0.2 Volume of 500 312 340 340/312- added foam [L] 500 Surfactant 0.01 0.01 0 0.01 (layer active B only) ingredients [wt.-%].sup.2 Synthetic 0 0 0.5-0.75 0.5-0.75 polymer solid (layer A matter [wt.-%].sup.2 only).sup.6 .sup.1= water-to-stucco-ratio; .sup.2based on weight of calcium sulfate binder; .sup.3relative amounts for boards with a density of <800 kg/m.sup.3; .sup.4relative amounts for boards with a density >800 kg/m.sup.3; .sup.5relative amounts of layer A correspond Sample 9 and relative amounts of layer B correspond to Sample 8. Polyvinyl acetate was used as synthetic polymer foam for the test specimen of Samples 9 and 10; .sup.6This corresponds to 0.3 wt.-% synthetic polymer solid matter based on the calcium sulfate binder of the entire test specimen.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Samples 8 Volumetric Nail pull [N] standard weight [kg/m.sup.3] deviation of three measurements 785** 407 11 786** 389 13 794** 396 10 842** 417 12 * relative amounts used to make boards correspond to Sample 8.sup.3 of Table 4; **relative amounts used to make boards correspond to Sample8.sup.4 of Table 4
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Samples 9 Volumetric Nail pull [N] standard weight [kg/m.sup.3] deviation of three measurements 798** 425 12 802** 431 18 839** 464 16 * relative amounts used to make Layer B correspond to Sample 8.sup.3 of Table 4; **relative amounts used to make Layer B correspond to Sample 8.sup.4 of Table 4
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Samples 10 Volumetric Nail pull [N] standard weight [kg/m.sup.3] deviation of three measurements 807*** 454 16 807*** 480 9 845*** 468 14 ***Layer A had a thickness of 2.5 mm to 4.5 mm, Layer B had a thickness of 8 mm to 10 mm
[0072]
[0073] Tables 5 to 7 list the nail pull measurements of test specimen containing a surfactant foam (Table 5), test specimen containing a synthetic polymer foam (Table 6) and two-layered specimen (Table 7) for a representative range of volumetric weight. The comparison shows that a layer of only 2.5 mm to 4.5 mm of synthetic polymer foam is sufficient to achieve the nail pull results in the range of test specimen prepared entirely with synthetic polymer foam. The two-layered samples fall within or slightly above the correlation curve of the samples made with only synthetic polymer foam.
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
[0074] 1 first foaming device for preparing synthetic polymer foam [0075] 2 second foaming device for preparing surfactant foam [0076] 3 first mixer [0077] 4 second mixer [0078] 5a, 50, 50a first discharging device for a first slurry comprising a synthetic polymer foam [0079] 6 second discharging device for a second stucco slurry comprising a surfactant foam [0080] 7, 7a liner [0081] 8 rotating roller [0082] 9 conveyor [0083] 10 setting belt [0084] 11 roller converyor [0085] 12 direction of travel to dryer [0086] 13 first conduit [0087] 14 second conduit [0088] 15, 15a layer A (formed from first slurry) [0089] 16 layer B (formed from second slurry) [0090] 17 guide roller