Interferometer with a looped or straight optical fiber
11885622 · 2024-01-30
Assignee
Inventors
- Eric DUCLOUX (Saint-Germain-En-Laye, FR)
- Cédric MOLUCON (Saint-Germain-En-Laye, FR)
- Hervè LEFEVRE (Saint-Germain-En-Laye, FR)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A fiber-optic interferometer is designed to receive and propagate a first single-mode wave along a first optical path and, respectively, a second single-mode wave along a second optical path, the second optical path being the reverse of the first optical path, and to form a first output wave and, respectively, a second output wave, having a modulated phase difference .sub.m(t). According to the invention, the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) is equal to sum of a first periodic phase difference .sub.(t) having a level equal to , a second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha(t) having a level equal to alpha and a third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) having a variable level between beta and +beta, said modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) comprising per modulation period T at least eight modulation levels among twelve modulation levels and said modulated phase difference between such that: .sub.m(t+T/2)=.sub.m(t).
Claims
1. A fiber-optic loop, or respectively in-line, interferometer comprising: a light source adapted to generate a source beam, a polarizer and a coil splitter arranged to split the source beam into a first single-mode wave and a second single-mode wave, the first single-mode wave and the second single-mode wave having a same polarization state, or respectively orthogonal polarization states, a digital processor and a digital-analog converter adapted to apply a modulation electric voltage V.sub.m(t) to a phase modulator adapted to induce a same phase shift .sub.m(t) on the first single-mode wave and the second single-mode wave, an optical fiber coil adapted to receive and propagate the first single-mode wave along a first optical path and the second single-mode wave along a second optical path, the first optical path and the second optical path being in reverse direction in the optical fiber coil, or respectively the first optical path and the second optical path comprising a first passage in the optical fiber coil, a reflection on a mirror and a second passage in the reverse direction in the optical fiber coil, the orthogonal polarization states being inverted upon reflection on the mirror, and to form after a propagation time difference a first output wave and a second output wave, respectively, having a modulated phase difference .sub.m(t)=.sub.m(t).sub.m (t), the optical fiber coil having an eigen frequency f.sub.p equal to the inverse of the double of the propagation time difference , the coil splitter being adapted to recombine the first output wave and the second output wave and to form a temporally modulated interferometric beam, a photosensor and an analog-digital converter adapted to detect a power P(t) of the interferometric beam as a function of time, wherein the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) is equal to the sum of a first periodic phase difference .sub. (t) of level equal to , a second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha (t) of level equal to alpha and a third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) of variable level between beta and +beta, alpha and beta having predetermined different values, in such a way that the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) has a period of modulation T equal to an odd multiple (2M+1) of the double of the propagation time difference , where M is a natural integer, the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) having, per period of modulation T, at least eight modulation levels among the twelve following modulation levels: a+=+alpha+beta; .sub.a=+alphabeta; .sub.a=+alpha; .sub.b+=alpha+beta; .sub.b=alphabeta; .sub.b=alpha; .sub.c+=+alpha+beta; .sub.c=+alphabeta; .sub.c=+alpha; .sub.d+=alpha+beta; .sub.d=alphabeta; .sub.d=alpha; and this modulated phase difference being such that: a. .sub.m(t+T/2)=.sub.m(t) b. at each time t comprised between 0 and T.
2. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 1, wherein the period of modulation T is equal to the double of the propagation time difference , the first periodic phase difference .sub.(t) has a modulation frequency equal to the eigen frequency f.sub.p and wherein the second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha(t) and the third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) have a same modulation frequency equal to an odd multiple (2N+1) of the eigen frequency f.sub.p, where N is a non-zero natural integer, the second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha(t) being synchronized with the first periodic phase difference .sub.(t), the third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) being in phase quadrature with respect to the second periodic phase difference .sub.a (t).
3. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 2, wherein the digital processor is adapted to extract a signal representative of a quantity to be measured, a transfer function signal of the phase modulator and/or a transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter from a series of at least 12 power measurements of the detected interferometric beam per period of modulation.
4. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 1, wherein: the period of modulation T is equal to the double of the propagation time difference , the third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) having a modulation frequency equal to the eigen frequency f.sub.p and wherein the first periodic phase difference .sub.(t) and the second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha(t) have a same modulation frequency equal to an odd multiple (2N+1) of the eigen frequency f.sub.p, where N is a non-zero natural integer, the second periodic phase difference being in phase quadrature with respect to the first periodic phase difference, the third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) being synchronized with the first periodic phase difference or with the second periodic phase difference.
5. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to a claim 4, wherein the digital processor is adapted to extract a signal representative of a quantity to be measured, a transfer function signal of the phase modulator and/or a transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter from a series of at least 12 power measurements of the detected interferometric beam per period of modulation.
6. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 1, wherein M is a non-zero integer and wherein: the first periodic phase difference .sub.(t) and the second periodic phase difference .sub.alpha(t) have a same modulation frequency equal to the eigen frequency f.sub.p, the second periodic phase difference being in phase quadrature with respect to the first periodic phase difference and the third periodic phase difference .sub.beta(t) having a period of modulation equal to the period of modulation T, this third periodic phase difference being synchronized with the first periodic phase difference or the second periodic phase difference.
7. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 6, wherein the digital processor is adapted to extract a signal representative of a quantity to be measured, a transfer function signal of the phase modulator and/or a transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter from a series of at least 12 power measurements of the detected interferometric beam per period of modulation.
8. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 1, wherein the digital processor is adapted to extract a signal representative of a quantity to be measured, a transfer function signal of the phase modulator and/or a transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter from a series of at least 12 power measurements of the detected interferometric beam per period of modulation.
9. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 8, wherein the signal representative of the quantity to be measured is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by 1 for the levels corresponding to alpha and by +1 for the levels corresponding to +alpha.
10. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 6, wherein the transfer function signal of the phase modulator is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by the sign of the product of the first n modulation sign and the second alpha modulation + or sign, or by zero in such a way as to keep a same number of states multiplied by the sign + and states multiplied by the sign .
11. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 9, wherein the transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by the sign of the product of the second alpha modulation sign and the third beta modulation sign when the level of this last modulation is +beta or beta, and by zero when the level of this third beta modulation is zero.
12. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 8, wherein the transfer function signal of the phase modulator is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by the sign of the product of the first n modulation sign and the second alpha modulation + or sign, or by zero in such a way as to keep a same number of states multiplied by the sign + and states multiplied by the sign .
13. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 7, wherein the transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by the sign of the product of the second alpha modulation sign and the third beta modulation sign when the level of this last modulation is +beta or beta, and by zero when the level of this third beta modulation is zero.
14. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 8, wherein the transfer function signal of the photosensor and analog-digital converter is equal to a sum of the interferometric beam power measurements acquired per period of modulation, each power measurement being multiplied by the sign of the product of the second alpha modulation sign and the third beta modulation sign when the level of this last modulation is +beta or beta, and by zero when the level of this third beta modulation is zero.
15. The fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer according to claim 8, wherein the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) further includes a ramp composed of phase steps .sub.FB opposite to a phase difference .sub.S of the signal representative of the quantity to be measured.
16. A fiber-optic loop interferometer according to claim 1, wherein the coil splitter is adapted to spatially split the source beam into the first single-mode wave and the second single mode wave and wherein the optical fiber coil is adapted to receive the first single-mode wave at a first end of the optical fiber coil and the second single-mode wave at a second end of the optical fiber coil, respectively, the first single-mode wave and the second single-mode wave propagating in reverse direction in the optical fiber coil.
17. The fiber-optic loop interferometer according to claim 16, wherein the first single-mode wave and the second single-mode wave are linearly polarized and the optical fiber coil is linear polarization maintaining, the interferometer being adapted to measure a phase difference representative of a rotation about an axis of the optical fiber coil.
18. The fiber-optic loop interferometer according to claim 16, wherein the optical fiber coil is circular polarization maintaining and wherein the fiber-optic loop interferometer includes: a linear polarization maintaining optical fiber section, another linear polarization maintaining optical fiber section, a quarter-wave plate being arranged between the optical fiber section and an end of the optical fiber coil, another quarter-wave plate being arranged between the other optical fiber section and the other end of the optical fiber coil, the interferometer being adapted to measure a phase difference induced by an electric current passing through the optical fiber coil.
19. A fiber-optic in-line interferometer according to claim 1, wherein the optical fiber coil is circular polarization maintaining and further including: a linear polarization maintaining optical fiber section the optical fiber section being connected to one end of the optical fiber coil, the mirror being arranged at a second end of the optical fiber coil, the interferometer being adapted to measure a phase difference induced by an electric current running through the optical fiber coil.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Moreover, various other features of the invention emerge from the appended description made with reference to the drawings that illustrate non-limitative embodiments of the invention and in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15) It is to be noted that, in these figures, the structural and/or functional elements common to the different variants can be denoted by the same references.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(16) In a phase modulation interferometer system as described in relation with
(17) The present disclosure shows that this RC time constant can influence the performances of an interferometer system and proposes different modulation and demodulation schemes to reduce or even cancel the negative effects induced by the phase modulator RC time constant.
(18)
(19)
(20) Finally,
(21) Indeed, when the digital processor 10 and the digital-analog converter 11 generate a square modulation control signal C.sub.m(t) switching between two plateaus, the RC electrical response time results in that the control voltage V.sub.m(t) actually applied to the modulator and the modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) generated by the latter does not reach instantaneously the desired level. More precisely, each level of modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) follows an exponential curve in (1exp(t/RC)) that starts from the preceding level and asymptotically tends towards the desired value for this level. On the power P vs time curve, it results therefrom that two states of the measured interferometer signal theoretically corresponding to a same power level but starting from different preceding levels are in fact not identical because they have not the same history. For the 8-state modulation, the conventional demodulation of the signal relating to the measured quantity is based on the differences between the measured powers for the pairs of states 1 and 3, 5 and 7, 2 and 4, 6 and 8 (see equation Math 7). In particular, state 8, that precedes state 1 (modulo T), is of lower level than state 2, that precedes state 3, so that states 1 and 3 are not perfectly identical, because they have not the same history, and their difference calculated in the demodulation is not perfectly zero in the absence of rotation, hence when .sub.S=0. Likewise, state 4, preceding state 5, is of higher level than state 6, preceding state 7, so that states 5 and 7 are not either identical, neither having the same history. Now, it is fundamental that the demodulation of the signal of the quantity to be measured effectively gives zero and generates no defect when the parameter to be measured in the interferometer is zero, in particular no defect in a Sagnac interferometer in the absence of rotation.
(22) On the bottom right curve in
(23) The present disclosure proposes different modulation and demodulation techniques adapted to alleviate or even cancel the defects induced by the RC time constant of the phase modulator control circuit in an interferometer system generating at least 8 levels per period of modulation and 12 states per period of demodulation.
(24)
(25) In the following of the present document, it is meant by level (or modulation level) the asymptotic value of the different values of the modulated phase difference .sub.m for each modulation step. It is meant by modulation states, the different measured power P values corresponding to the modulation levels that follow each other over each period of modulation. Several states can use a same modulation level over a period of modulation.
(26) In the first embodiment, in relation with
.sub.m(t)=.sub.(t)+.sub.alpha(t)+.sub.beta(t)[Math 10]
(27) In the example illustrated in
(28) On the .sub.m(t) curve of
(29) At each period T, this modulation of the phase difference .sub.m(t) generates the following 8 modulation levels .sub.m(t)=alphabeta. These eight modulation levels correspond to the points noted a.sup.+, a.sup., b.sup.+, b.sup., c.sup.+, c.sup., d.sup.+ and d.sup. on the power vs phase difference curve.
(30) In
(31) On the output power P vs time curve, the 8 levels of modulated phase difference .sub.m (t) follow each other in a sequence of 12 states per period of modulation T, in the following order: b.sup. b.sup.+ a.sup.+ a.sup. b.sup. b.sup.+ c.sup.+ c.sup. d.sup. d.sup.+ c.sup.+ c.sup..
(32) The detector receiving the interferometric beam acquires 12 power measurements P.sub.i per period of modulation T corresponding to the twelve states i=1, . . . , 12. In other words, the detector samples the power signal P at the frequency 12 f.sub.p. More generally, for a modulation of the second phase difference .sub.alpha (t) and the third phase difference .sub.beta(t) at (2N+1).Math.f.sub.p, the sampling is made at 4.Math.(2N+1).Math.f.sub.p. On the power vs time curve, the effect of the RC time constant of the phase modulator control circuit on the detected power measurements is clearly observed. The value of each power measurement P.sub.i reaches a plateau according to an exponential curve that depends on the difference between the two successive asymptotic power values.
(33) A specific demodulation is applied, according to the searched signal. More precisely, to extract the signal of the quantity to be measured, for example the Sagnac signal, a demodulation of the 12 acquired states is used. Over the period of modulation T equal to 2, the signs are applied in the following order to the 12 power measurements Pi: ++++++. In other words, the power measurement P.sub.i is multiplied by 1 for the levels corresponding to alpha and by +1 for the levels corresponding to +alpha, independently of the sign of the and beta modulations. Hence, the demodulation of the signal of the quantity to be measured modulated on 12 states is expressed as follows in the first embodiment.
S.sub.S=P.sub.1P.sub.2+P.sub.3+P.sub.4P.sub.5P.sub.6+P.sub.7+P.sub.8P.sub.9P.sub.10+P.sub.11+P.sub.12[Math 11]
(34) It is observed, on the power vs time curve, that the 8-level and 12-state modulation has, for each demodulated state with the sign +, an identical state, i.e. a state with the same history, demodulated with the sign . Hence, state 1 corresponding to level b.sup. is identical to state 7 corresponding to level c.sup.+; state 2 corresponding to level b.sup.+ is identical to state 8 corresponding to level c.sup.; state 3 corresponding to level a.sup.+ is identical to state 9 corresponding to level d.sup.; state 4 corresponding to level a.sup. is identical to state 10 corresponding to level d.sup.+; state 5 corresponding to level b.sup. is identical to state 11 corresponding to level c.sup.+; state 6 corresponding to level b.sup.+ is identical to state 12 corresponding to level c.sup.. In other words, at each state of the first half-period T/2, demodulated to extract therefrom the quantity to be measured, in + or in , corresponds to a state of same history, demodulated with the reverse sign, in the second half-period. It is observed that the phase difference .sub.m(t) modulated according to the 8-level and 12 state modulation of the first embodiment verifies the following equation at any time t of a period of modulation T, here comprised between 0 and 2.
.sub.m(t+T/2)=.sub.m(t)[Math 12]
(35) It results therefrom that the demodulation of a signal modulated according to 8 levels and 12 states as described hereinabove, to extract the signal of the quantity to be measured, for example the Sagnac signal, has no defect induced by the RC time constant, contrary to a demodulation of a signal modulated according to a conventional 8-level and 8-state modulation.
(36) In the first embodiment, the demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function, denoted V is performed by multiplying the power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired over a period of modulation T by the sign of the product of the modulation + or sign and the alpha modulation + or sign, independently of the beta modulation sign, or by zero in such a way as to keep only as many states multiplied by + as states multiplied by . The demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function, denoted V.sub., is expressed as follows in the first embodiment.
S.sub.V.sub.
(37) In the first embodiment, the demodulation of the detection system transfer function, or open-loop response, denoted P, is performed at the frequency 6f.sub.p by multiplying the 12 power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired over a period of modulation T, by the sign of the product of the alpha modulation + or sign and the beta modulation + or sign, independently of the modulation sign. In the example illustrated in
S.sub.P=+P.sub.1P.sub.2+P.sub.3P.sub.4+P.sub.5P.sub.6+P.sub.7P.sub.8+P.sub.9P.sub.10+P.sub.11P.sub.12[Math 14]
(38) The first embodiment based on a modulation at f.sub.p, alpha modulation at 3f.sub.p and beta modulation at 3f.sub.p inducing 8 modulation levels and 12 states per period T makes it possible to extract by a suitable demodulation the signal of the quantity to be measured, the signal V.sub. and the open-loop response signal P, the signal of the quantity to be measured being corrected for the defects induced by the RC time constant of the phase modulator control circuit. This modulation and demodulation scheme makes it possible to improve the performances of an interferometer system without modifying the structure thereof and allows an upgrade of the existing interferometer systems.
(39) A second embodiment will now be described in relation with
(40) The modulation is also applied according to 8 levels per period of modulation T. The control signal C.sub.m(t) is here too consisted of the sum of three square modulations. In this second embodiment, the first square modulation induces a first phase difference .sub.(t) of level equal to +. The first phase difference is periodic and has a modulation frequency equal to an odd multiple (2N+1) of the eigen frequency f.sub.p, where N is a natural integer higher than or equal to 1. The second square modulation voltage is adapted to induce a second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) of level equal to alpha. The second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) is periodic and has a modulation frequency equal to the same odd multiple (2N+1) of the eigen frequency f.sub.p, where N is a natural integer higher than or equal to 1. The second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) is in quadrature with respect to the first phase difference .sub.(t). The third square modulation voltage is adapted to induce a third phase difference .sub.beta(t) of level equal to beta. The third phase difference beta(t) is periodic and has a modulation frequency equal to f.sub.p synchronized with the first phase difference .sub.(t).
(41) In the example illustrated in
(42) On the .sub.m (t) curve of
(43) As in the first embodiment, the modulated phase difference .sub.m (t) includes 8 levels and this phase difference .sub.m (t) modulated on 8 levels generates 12 modulation states on the output power curve as a function of time, in the following order: b.sup.+ a.sup.+ c.sup. d.sup. b.sup. a.sup. c.sup. d.sup. b.sup.+ a.sup.+ c.sup.+ d.sup.+ corresponding to the phase differences .sub.a+ to .sub.d mentioned hereinabove.
(44) The detector acquires 12 power measurements P.sub.i per period of modulation T corresponding to the twelve states i=1, . . . , 12. On the power vs time curve, the effect of the phase modulator RC time constant on the detected power measurements is here also clearly observed.
(45) In the second embodiment, the demodulation of the signal of the quantity to be measured, for example the Sagnac signal, is similar to that of the first embodiment insofar as the power measurement P.sub.i for i=1, 2, . . . , 12 over a period of modulation is multiplied by 1 for the levels corresponding to alpha and by +1 for the levels corresponding to +alpha, independently of the and beta modulations sign. This demodulation scheme is expressed by the following formula in the second embodiment.
S.sub.S=P.sub.1+P.sub.2+P.sub.3P.sub.4P.sub.5+P.sub.6+P.sub.7P.sub.8P.sub.9+P.sub.10+P.sub.11P.sub.12[Math 15]
(46) Hence, to each state of the first half-period T/2, demodulated in plus or minus, corresponds a state of same history on the second half-period, demodulated in the reverse direction, i.e. in minus or plus: the pairs 1-7, 2-8, 3-9, 4-10, 5-11 and 6-12 make is possible to cancel the effects induced by the phase modulator RC. Indeed, in the second embodiment, it is observed in
(47) Likewise, the demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function, denoted V.sub. demodulation, is made by multiplying the 12 power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired over a period of modulation T, by the sign of the product of the modulation + or sign and the alpha modulation + or sign, independently of the sign of the beta modulation.
(48) Hence, the demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function, denoted V.sub.7, demodulation, on 12 states is expressed in the second embodiment by the following formula.
S.sub.V.sub.
(49) Finally, the demodulation of the detection system transfer function, denoted P demodulation, is made by multiplying the 12 power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired over a period of modulation T, by the sign of the product of the alpha modulation + or sign and the beta modulation + or sign, independently of the modulation sign.
(50) Hence, the demodulation of the detection system transfer function, denoted P, on 12 states is expressed as follows in the second embodiment.
S.sub.P=P.sub.1+P.sub.2P.sub.3+P.sub.4+P.sub.5P.sub.6P.sub.7+P.sub.8P.sub.9+P.sub.10+P.sub.11P.sub.12[Math 17]
(51) In the second embodiment, the signal of the quantity to be measured is also corrected for the defects induced by the phase modulator RC time constant.
(52) A third embodiment will now be described in relation with
(53) The control signal C.sub.m(t) is also consisted of the sum of three square modulations. In the third embodiment, the first square modulation induces a first phase difference .sub.(t) of level equal to . The first phase difference is periodic and has a modulation frequency equal to the eigen frequency f.sub.p. The second square modulation is adapted to induce a second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) of level equal to alpha. The second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) is periodic and of modulation frequency equal to the eigen frequency f.sub.p, in quadrature with respect to the first phase difference .sub.(t). In other words, the sum of the first phase difference and the second phase difference .sub.alpha(t) produces a 4-state modulation (in dotted line on the modulated phase difference vs time curve in
(54) In the example illustrated in
(55) The modulated phase difference .sub.m(t) or total modulation resulting from the sum of the dotted-line modulation and the dashed-line modulation has a period of modulation T equal to (2N+1).Math.2. In the example of
(56) In
(57) On the output power P vs phase difference curve of
(58) As in the first and second embodiments, during the demodulation of the signal of the quantity to be measured, for example the Sagnac signal, to each state of the first half-period T/2, demodulated to extract therefrom the quantity to be measured, in + or in , corresponds a state of same history, demodulated with the reverse sign, in the second half-period. This demodulation scheme is expressed by the following formula in the third embodiment.
S.sub.S=P.sub.1+P.sub.2+P.sub.3P.sub.4P.sub.5+P.sub.6+P.sub.7P.sub.8P.sub.9+P.sub.10+P.sub.11P.sub.12[Math 18]
(59) The demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function, denoted V.sub., is made by multiplying the 12 power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired on a period of modulation T, by the sign of the product of the modulation + or sign and the alpha modulation + or sign, independently of the beta modulation sign.
(60) Hence, the demodulation of the phase modulator transfer function V.sub. modulated on 12 states is expressed for this third embodiment according to the same equation (Math 16) as for the second embodiment.
(61) Finally, the demodulation of the detection system transfer function, denoted P, is made by multiplying the 12 power measurements P.sub.i for i=1, . . . , 12 acquired over the period of modulation T=6, by the sign of the product of the alpha modulation + or sign and the beta modulation + or sign when beta is non zero and by 0 when beta is zero, independently of the modulation sign. In particular, beta is zero for the states a, b, c and d.
(62) Hence, the demodulation of the detection system transfer function P on 12 states is expressed as follows in the third embodiment.
S.sub.P=P.sub.1+P.sub.2P.sub.7+P.sub.8[Math 19]
(63) In the third embodiment too, the signal of the quantity to be measured is corrected for the defects induced by the phase modulator RC time constant.
(64)
(65) Advantageously, the 8-level and 12-state modulation according to any one of the embodiments described hereinabove is used to control the signal of the parameter to be measured (for example, the Sagnac signal), the adjustment of the signal V.sub. and/or the open-loop response (or signal P).
(66) In summary, the table below shows the demodulation rules for the three embodiments described hereinabove.
(67) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Demodulation of the and alpha , alpha and Modulation parameter to Demodulation Demodulation mod. mod. beta mod. levels be measured of V.sub. of P + + + alpha + + alpha + beta a.sup.+ + + + + + alpha a + + 0 + + alpha beta a.sup. + + + alpha + alpha + beta b.sup.+ + alpha b 0 + alpha beta b.sup. + + alpha + alpha + beta c.sup.+ + + + alpha c + 0 + alpha beta c.sup. + alpha alpha + beta d.sup.+ + alpha d + 0 alpha beta d.sup. + +
(68) The invention applies to a fiber-optic Sagnac loop interferometer system for measuring a rotation rate about the axis of the optical fiber coil, for example as illustrated in
(69) The invention also applies to a fiber-optic loop or in-line interferometer for applications as a magnetic field sensor or as an electric current sensor.
(70) By way of non-limitative example,
(71) By way of other non-limitative example,
(72)
(73) Of course, various other modifications can be brought to the invention within the scope of the appended claims.