STATIC DISSIPATIVE FLOORING SYSTEM

Abstract

The invention is a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering, comprising: a magnetically receptive floor surface; and a floor covering comprising a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles, wherein the tiles are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles and the magnetically receptive surface.

Claims

1. A magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering, comprising: a magnetically receptive floor surface; a floor covering comprising a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles, wherein magnetic interaction between the floor tiles and the magnetically receptive surface causes the floor tiles to be retained on the floor surface.

2. The floor covering according to claim 1, wherein: the floor tiles are a composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer, b) an integral, conductive ground plane and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer, the conductive ground plane comprising a non-woven synthetic fabric with a nickel-copper coating and a conductive adhesive backing, the conductive ground plane bonded to the static dissipative wearing layer by the conductive adhesive backing.

3. The floor covering according to claim 1, wherein the floor surface includes a magnetically receptive underlayment.

4. The floor covering according to claim 3, wherein the magnetically receptive underlayment comprises a polymeric binder and magnetic and/or magnetisable particles, wherein the magnetic and/or magnetisable particles are selected from paramagnetic, superparamagnetic and/or ferromagnetic substances selected from the group comprising iron, iron oxides, mixed iron oxides with other metal oxides from the transition elements group including iron-nickel oxides, ferro-silicones or combinations thereof.

5. The floor covering according to claim 4, wherein the polymeric binder comprises an air-dried resin, including an acrylic, alkyd, epoxy-ester or vinyl resin.

6. The floor covering according to claim 4, wherein the polymeric binder comprises a two-part, thermosetting resin selected from an epoxy, polyurethane or polyurea resin, wherein the two-part thermosetting resin comprises at least one aliphatic poly-isocyanate component and at least one poly-aspartic acid ester component.

7. The floor covering according to claim 1, wherein the floor tiles are a composite construction comprising a) a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer, b) an integral, conductive ground plane and c) an integral, planar magnetic layer.

8. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer (5) has a resistivity from 10.sup.6 ohm.Math.cm to 10.sup.9 ohm.Math.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer has a static decay time (5,000 volts?0 volts) of less than 0.10 seconds according to the Federal? 101B, Method 4046 standard.

9. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer has a resistivity from 2.5?10.sup.4 ohm.Math.cm to 1?10.sup.6 ohm.Math.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer has a static decay time (5,000 volts?0 volts) of less than 0.03 seconds according to the Federal? 101B, Method 4046 standard.

10. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane comprises a non-woven synthetic fabric with a Nickel-Copper coating and a conductive adhesive backing, wherein the conductive ground plane is bonded to the static dissipative wearing layer by a conductive adhesive backing.

11. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane comprises a conductive adhesive or coating composition containing graphene powder.

12. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the conductive ground plane has a sheet resistivity from 0.01 ohm/sq. to 0.10 ohm/sq. according to the ASTM F390 standard.

13. The floor covering according to claim 7, wherein the planar magnetic layer comprises a flexible, polymeric magnetic sheet bonded to the conductive ground plane by an adhesive, wherein the adhesive is a pressure sensitive adhesive, and/or that the magnetic layer has a magnetic remanence from 0.15 Tesla, to 0.50 Tesla and/or that the magnetic layer has a magnetic coercivity from 95.500 Nm to 239.000 Nm.

14. The floor covering according to claim 1, wherein the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a resistivity from 10.sup.6 ohm.Math.cm to 10.sup.9 ohm.Math.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a static decay time (5,000 volts?0 volts) of less than 0.10 seconds according to the Federal? 101B, Method 4046 standard.

15. The floor covering according to claim 1, wherein the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a resistivity from 2.5?10.sup.4 ohm.Math.cm to 1?10.sup.6 ohm.Math.cm according to the ASTM D257 standard, and/or that the magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering system has a static decay time (5,000 volts?0 volts) of less than 0.03 seconds according to the Federal? 101B, Method 4046 standard.

16. Flooring system comprising a magnetically receptive floor surface and a floor covering comprising a plurality of static dissipative floor tiles, wherein the tiles are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles and the magnetically receptive surface.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0034] Further characteristics and advantages of the present invention become clear by the following description of magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor coverings with reference to the enclosed drawing. There is

[0035] FIG. 1 a schematic front side view of a floor covering according to the invention;

[0036] FIG. 2 a schematic cross-sectional view of the floor covering shown in FIG. 1;

[0037] FIG. 3 a schematic view of a test arrangement for a floor covering according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

[0038] FIGS. 1 and 2 show a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering 1 which was created by a method according to the present invention and is applied to a substrate floor 2 which has a magnetically receptive surface 3.

[0039] The floor covering 1 is composed of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles 4 which can be placed on the magnetically receptive surface 3. Concretely the floor tiles 4 are of composite construction comprising a static dissipative vinyl wearing layer 5, an integral, conductive ground plane 6 and an integral, planar magnetic layer 7.

[0040] The conductive ground plane 6 is formed by a non-woven synthetic fabric 8 with a nickel-copper coating and a conductive adhesive backing. Presently a conductive adhesive 9 is applied onto the copper-nickel coated fabric 8 which allows an efficient bonding to the static dissipative vinyl wearing layer 5 on top. Alternatively, the conductive ground plane 6 could also be formed by a conductive adhesive composition comprising in particular a two-part, thermosetting polyurethane composition blended with graphene powder.

[0041] On the underside of the nickel-copper-fabric 8 the magnetic layer 7 is bonded by means of an adhesive layer 10. The magnetic layer 7 ensures that the tiles deposited on the substrate floor, respectively the magnetically receptive surface 3 are fixed at their position due to the magnetic interaction. At the same time the tiles 4 can easily be exchanged.

[0042] In FIG. 2 it is visible how a static charge applied by a person 11 walking on the floor covering 1 is drained off. As the arrows show the static charge is transmitted via the vinyl wearing layer 5 and the adhesive 9 on top of the nickel-copper-fabric 8 to the latter, drained to the sides before a connection of the conductive ground plane 6 to the substrate floor 2 ensures that the charge is drained to the building.

[0043] To create such a magnetically adhered, static dissipative floor covering 1, at first a magnetically receptive floor surface 3 has to be provided. After that a floor covering 1 has to be provided which comprises a plurality of static dissipative, magnetic floor tiles 4, wherein the tiles 4 are held in place by magnetic interaction between the tiles 4 and the magnetically receptive surface 3.

[0044] FIG. 3 shows a test arrangement for a floor covering according to the present invention to allow measurements of surface resistivity in a two-dimensional array, as per the ASTM D257 standard. The resistivity is measured on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d with respect to tile 4a by means of a test electrode 12 in respect to a reference electrode 13.

[0045] The following examples are given for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be a limitation of the scope of protection defined by the claims.

Example 1

[0046] Four Statguard? 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm?300 mm?3.2 mm) commercially sold by Desco Industries Inc. were coated on the underside with a conductive adhesive composition formed by blending 12 parts by weight of GS030P graphene powder available from Graphene Star Ltd. with 100 parts by weight of Magna Tak polyurethane adhesive from Thortex America Inc. The conductive adhesive composition was applied using a serrated edge comb and then lightly rolled with a short nap roller to provide a thickness of approximately 500 microns. After allowing to gel for 2 hours, KM 101G magnetic sheet received from Kingfine Magnetics Ltd. was applied to the conductive layer. The composite tiles were allowed to cure overnight and then affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System from IOBAC Ltd. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per FIG. 3 below.

Example 2

[0047] Four Statguard? 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm?300 mm?3.2 mm) were coated on the underside with a conductive adhesive composition formed by blending 12 parts by weight of GS030P graphene powder commercially sold by Graphene Star Ltd. with 100 parts by weight of Magna Tak polyurethane adhesive. The conductive adhesive composition was applied using a serrated edge comb and then lightly rolled with a short nap roller to provide a thickness of approximately 500 microns. After allowing to gel for 2 hours, KM 501G magnetic sheet from Kingfine Magnetics Ltd. was applied to the conductive layer. The composite tiles were allowed to cure overnight and affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.

Example 3

[0048] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric commercially sold by Faraday Defense was applied to the underside of four Statguard? 8432 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm?300 mm?3.2 mm). KMG 501G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.

Example 4

[0049] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric was applied to the underside of four Statguard? 8412 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm?300 mm?3.2 mm) commercially available from Desco Industries Ltd. KMG 101G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.

Example 5

[0050] EMF RF Shielding Nickel Copper Fabric was applied to the underside of four Statguard? 8412 ESD Vinyl Floor Tiles (300 mm?300 mm?3.2 mm). KMG 501G self-adhesive magnetic sheet was then affixed to the Nickel Copper fabric. The composite tiles were affixed to marine ply boards which had previously been treated with MS 870 Magnetised Floor System. The tiles were butted against each other in a two-dimensional array and surface resistivity measurements, as per the ASTM D257 standard, undertaken on tiles 4b, 4c, 4d in turn with respect to tile 4a, as per example 1.

[0051] The individual resistivity measurements recorded for Examples 1-5, as per the ASTM D257 standard, are detailed in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 Example Number Surface Resistivity Measurements (ohm .Math. cm) 1 5.0 ? 10.sup.5 5.1 ? 10.sup.5 4.8 ? 10.sup.5 2 5.2 ? 10.sup.5 5.5 ? 10.sup.5 5.1 ? 10.sup.5 3 1.0 ? 10.sup.5 1.2 ? 10.sup.7 1.2 ? 10.sup.5 4 3.3 ? 10.sup.7 3.7 ? 10.sup.7 3.6 ? 10.sup.7 5 3.5 ? 10.sup.7 3.5 ? 10.sup.7 3.8 ? 10.sup.7