T CELLS MODIFIED TO EXPRESS MUTATED CXCR4 OR PARTIALLY DELETED AND USES THEREOF
20240083973 · 2024-03-14
Inventors
- Karl BALABANIAN (Clamart, FR)
- Jacqueline MARVEL (Lyon, FR)
- Mélanie WENCKER (Lyon-Cedex 07, FR)
- Sophia DJEBALI (Lyon, FR)
Cpc classification
C12N5/0638
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61K39/4611
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K35/17
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to modified T cells, and in particular to CD8 T cells, for use in therapy. The current inventors investigates the effect of CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation on CD8 effector and memory responses. By analysing the lymphoid organs, including the BM compartment, in a mouse model of Whim syndrome and in mice where only CD8 T-cells carry the mutation, this study shows that CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation only partially affect CD8 primary responses. By contrast, CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation considerably improve the long-term maintenance and magnitude of CD8 memory responses by increasing the pool size of Antigen specific CD8 T-cells, first in the BM and then in other lymphoid organs, bringing new insight into the current discrepancy regarding the role of the BM in the maintenance CD8 memory cells. In particular, the present invention relates to T cell, and more particular to CD8 T cell, characterized in that it expresses CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation or a CXCR4 with the deletion of the C-terminal domain between and 20 amino acid residues.
Claims
1-8. (canceled)
9. A method of producing a T cell which expresses a chimeric antigen receptor that recognizes and binds to an antigen, comprising transfecting or transducing, in vitro or ex vivo, a T cell that expresses a CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation or that has a deletion of from 10 to 20 amino acid residues within a C-terminal domain of CXCR4, in with a vector encoding for the chimeric antigen receptor.
10. (canceled)
11. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a population of T cells that express a CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation or that have a deletion of from 10 to 20 amino acid residues within a C-terminal domain of CXCR4, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
12. A method of treating an infectious disease in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of T cells which express a CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation or which have a deletion of 10-20 amino acid residues in a C-terminal domain of CXCR4.
13. The method according to claim 12 wherein the infectious disease is caused by a virus or a bacteria that causes lung infection.
14. A method of treating cancer in a subject in need thereof, said method comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of T cells which express a CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation or which have a deletion of 10-20 amino acid residues in a C-terminal domain of CXCR4.
15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the cancer is a hematopoietic malignancy selected from the group consisting of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, lymphoid leukemia, lymphoma and myelodysplastic syndrome.
16. The method of claim 12, wherein the CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation is selected from the group consisting of: R334X, G336X, E343X, S341fs, S339fs342X, S338X and E343K.
17. The method of claim 12 wherein the deletion is a 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 amino acid residue deletion.
18. The method of claim 12, wherein the T cells are CD8+ T cells.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein the T cells express a chimeric antigen receptor which recognizes and binds to an antigen.
20. The method of claim 14, wherein the CXCR4.sup.Whim mutation is selected from the group consisting of: R334X, G336X, E343X, S341fs, S339fs342X, S338X and E343K.
21. The method of claim 14 wherein the deletion is a 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 amino acid residue deletion.
22. The method of claim 14, wherein the T cells are CD8+ T cells.
23. The method of claim 14, wherein the T cells express a chimeric antigen receptor which recognizes and binds to an antigen.
24. The method of claim 14, wherein the T cells are administered in adoptive cell therapy.
Description
FIGURES
[0130]
[0131] Schematic view of the experimental system used in the study. Left: WT mice and Whim mice (CXCR4.sup.1013/+) were infected intranasally by 2.Math.10.sup.5 PFU of Vaccinia Virus (VV). Right: nave (CD44.sup.low) CD8 T-cells were FACS-sorted from F5-WT (expressing CD45.1. congenic marker) and FS-Whim (expressing CD45.2 congenic marker) mice and were mixed in equal numbers in PBS. The equivalent of 1.Math.10.sup.5 F5-WT and 1.Math.10.sup.5 FS-Whim were injected intravenously into C57Bl/6 WT recipient (expressing both CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic marker). 1 to 2 days following cells transfer, mice were infected intranasally by 2.Math.10.sup.5 PFU of Vaccinia Virus expressing NP68 peptide (VV-NP68, that is specific for F5-TCR)
[0132] (
[0133]
[0134]
[0135] White and black dots show WT and CXCR4 Whim mice, respectively. Data represent a pool of 3 (a,c) or 2 (b) independent experiments with at least 8 animals in total.
[0136]
[0138] White and black dots show FS-WT and FS-Whim, respectively. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with at least 5 mice per experiment.
EXAMPLE
[0139] Material & Methods (see
[0140] Mice:
[0141] C57BL/6 mice from Charles River were used as wild-type controls. C57BL/6 CXCR4.sup.+/1013 mice (Whim mice) were provided by Dr K. Balabanian.sup.6. F5 TCR-transgenic mice (CD45.1.sup.+) were obtained from Dr D. Kioussis.sup.25. FS-CXCR4.sup.+/1013 (FS-Whim, CD45.2.sup.+) and C57BL/6.Ly5.1 (CD45.1.sup.+.CD45.2.sup.+) were generated in the animal house (PBES). All mice were bred in the PBES (SFR Biosciences animal facility, Lyon, France) under specific pathogen-free conditions. Experiments were done on mice aged from six weeks to 18 months (memory compartment). All animal procedures were approved by our local Animal Evaluation Committee (CECCAPP).
[0142] Virus and Immunization:
[0143] Recombinant Vaccinia Viruses (VV) expressing the NP68 epitope were engineered from VV (strain Western Reserve) by Dr Denise Yu-Lin Teoh from Pr Sir Andrew McMichael's laboratory at the Human Immunology unit, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford, UK.
[0144] For cell transfer, C57BL/6 (CD45.1.sup.+.CD45.2.sup.+) recipients were transferred with 1.Math.10.sup.5 CD8-Ts from F5-Whim and FS-WT donor mice, by intra-venous injection in the retro-orbital sinus. The following day, recipients were infected by intra-nasal injection with VV-NP68 (2.Math.10.sup.5 PFU/mouse).
[0145] Cell Preparation, Culture and Activation:
[0146] Blood was collected from the retro-orbital sinus into 1 mL PBS containing 4 mM EDTA (Gibco). Flow-count fluorospheres (Beckman-Coulter) were then added to each tube and absolute numbers of cells/mL were calculated using the formula: [(Total number of cells/Total number of fluorospheres)fluorosphere concentration]/volume.
[0147] Single cells suspension from mediastinal lymph node and spleen were obtained by mechanical disaggregation on a 100 m cell strainer (BD Falcon). Lungs were flushed with PBS before harvesting from animals. To analyze the lung resident compartment, CD45 (clone 30-F11) was injected intra-venously before killing animals.sup.26. Single cells suspensions were obtained using the lung dissociation kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells from bone marrow were collected by flushing complete medium through tibias and femurs. For all organs, cells were resuspended in complete medium (DMEM, 6% Fetal Calf Serum, 1M hepes, 50 g mL.sup.1 gentamicin, 50 M -mercapto-ethanol). Absolute numbers of lymphocytes were determined using Accuri C6 Flow instrument (BD Biosciences) and Cflow software.IFN- production by CD8-Ts was induced by restimulation with NP68 (10 nM) for five hours, in presence of brefeldin A (1/500 dilution).
[0148] Flow Cytometry:
[0149] Cells were stained for 30 minutes on ice, in PBS 0.5% BSA, 0.01% NaAzide. The following antibodies, coupled to the appropriate fluorochromes, were used: CD8 (clone 53-6.7), CD45.1 (A20), CD44 (IM7.8.1), from BD Biosciences; CD45 (30-F11), from Biolegend; CD45.2 (104), CD62L (MeI14), from eBiosciences.
[0150] To evaluate cytokine secretion, cells were permeabilized using Cytofix/cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences), before being incubated with an antibody against IFN- (XMG1.2, BD Biosciences).
[0151] All samples were acquired on LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).
[0152] Statistical Analysis:
[0153] Results were analysed with Prism software. Data are expressed as means+/SEM. Statistical analyses used the unpaired two-tailed t-test and one-way or two-ways Anova. A p-value<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
[0154] Results
[0155] CD8 Responses to Lung Viral Infection are Slightly Delayed in Whim Mice
[0156] Upon infection, CD8 responses encompass substantial trafficking between SLO and infected tissue. Nave CD8 T-cells are activated in the mediastinal LN (medLN, lungs draining LN) before re-entering blood circulation in order to migrate back to the lung. In order to analyse the role of CXCR4 on CD8 trafficking, we made use of a mouse model of Whim syndrome, carrying CXCR4+/1013 gain-of-function mutation (referred as Whim mice).sup.6. Importantly and as described previously, this mouse model recapitulates immune defects observed in Whim patients, including decreased numbers of CD8 T-cells in the spleen and the blood of nave animals, as compared to wild type (WT) animals, reflecting lymphopenia described in patients (.sup.6 and data not shown). In order to evaluate CD8 T-cells responses following lung viral infection, we performed intranasal infection of WT and Whim mice with Vaccinia Virus (VV). Blood analysis of WT infected animals indicate that absolute numbers of total activated CD8 T-cells (as characterized by the expression of CD44 activation marker) was increased in this compartment at day 7 post infection, probably reflecting their release from the draining LN (
[0157] To further investigate the degree and nature of this delay, we performed mathematical modelling that estimated approximatively 1 to 2-day delay (data not shown).
[0158] CD8Whim Memory Cells are Preferentially Localised in the BM
[0159] We next thought to analyze the capacity of Whim mice to generate CD8 memory T-cells following lung infection. To that aim, we performed intranasal infection of WT and Whim animals with Vaccinia virus, and studied CD8 T-cells numbers and phenotype in the Lung, medLN and spleen, six weeks following infection. Since memory CD8 T-cells can home in the bone marrow (BM) and because this compartment is enriched for CXCL12, we included it in our analysis. By evaluating the sum of memory CD8 T-cells harvested from the spleen, the lung, the mediastinal LN and BM, we could show that comparable numbers of total and Ag-specific CD8 T-cells (specific for B8R) were generated in WT and Whim mice following infection (
[0160] In order to assess whether this preferential localization of memory CD8 T-cells is the BM was CD8-cells intrinsic, we made use of F5 TCR transgenic mice whose TCR specifically recognise NP68 peptide.sup.25. WT (FS-WT) expressing CD45.1 congenic marker and CXCR4+/1013 (FS-Whim, CD45.2+) nave CD8 T-cells expressing F5 transgene were co-transferred in congenic host (CD45.1+CD45.2+) before intranasal infection with a recombinant Vaccinia Virus expressing NP-68 (VV-NP68).sup.16. 60 days post infection, analysis of medLN, Lung, Spleen and BM compartment showed neither differences in absolute numbers between FS-WT and FS-Whim (
[0161] Nevertheless and similar to Whim mice, FS-Whim memory cells showed a modified distribution as compared to FS-WT, with a substantial increase of cells in the BM (
[0162] CD8whim Memory Cells Outnumber WT Memory Cells in Lymphoid Organs Over Time
[0163] BM has been suggested as a preferential site for CD8 memory maintenance, but discrepancies exist regarding the effect of specific bone marrow niches on CD8 memory cells outcome.
[0164] Since we observed a preferential localization of CD8-whim in the BM, we next thought to investigate whether this could impact long-term maintenance and/or accumulation of CD8 memory cells. To that aim, we co-transferred FS-WT and FS-CXCR4 in nave WT host and subsequently performed intranasal infection with VV-NP68 virus. Blood kinetics of FS-WT and FS-CXCR4 indicate comparable numbers of both cell types in the blood (ratio FS-WT/F5-CXCR4 close to 1), during early memory phase (
[0165] Molecular and Cellular Mechanism Underlying the Increase Number of CD8.sup.Whim Memory Cells
[0166] To apprehend the relative contribution of BM localization in CD8 proliferation and/or survival of memory CD8 T-cells, current analysis includes: [0167] BrDU assay (Chaix:2014gp) and cell cycle analysis combined with mathematical modelling; [0168] scRNA sequencing.sup.27 comparing F5-WT and FS-Whim isolated from the bone marrow, >10 months post infection with VV-NP68
[0169] Role of CXCR4.sup.Whim in the Long-Term Maintenance of Anti-Tumor Responses.
[0170] Innovating immunotherapy approaches are currently developed and include Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) that are engineered and transferred into T-cells to reprogram their cytotoxicity toward an antigen expressed by a given tumour.sup.28. However, and although CAR-T cells therapies have given promising results thus far on Multiple Myeloma and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, some patients still relapse.sup.29,30, emphasizing the need for a better maintenance of CAR-T cells. Interestingly, CD8 T-cells over-expressing CXCR4 have shown a better protection in mice models of lymphoma, as compared to WT.sup.31. Since much insight related to the feature of current immunotherapies targeting CD8 and memory CD8 T-cells has come from the study of virus infection of mice (e.g. the role of PD1 in regulating CD8 T cells post LCMV infection.sup.32), we study the impact of CXCR4 Whim-mutation on the long-term maintenance and pool size of tumor-specific CD8 T-cells responses.
[0171] This analysis include: [0172] investigating anti-tumoral responses of Whim mice (as compared to WT) and mice transferred with F5-WT and F5-CXCR4.sup.Whim CD8 T-cells following immunization with a tumor cell line expressing NP68. This study include the analysis of the long term maintenance of tumor-specific memory CD8 T-cells. [0173] proof of concept of the benefit of CAR-T cells expressing CXCR4.sup.Whim for the long-term maintenance of CD8 responses against a tumor
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE2 Usefulaminoacidsequencesfor practicingtheinvention SEQIDNO Aminoacidsequence 1.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGSSLK domainWT ILSKGKRGGHSSVST CKCR4 ESESSSFHSS 2.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGSSLK domainof ILSKGKRGGHSSVST E343K KSESSSFHSS 3.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGSSL domainof KILSKGKRGGHSSVST E343X 4.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGSS domainof LKILSKGKRGGHSSVPL E341fs SLSLQVFTPA...* 5.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGSS domainof LKILSKGKRGGHSCFH E339fs 6Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGS domainof SLKILSKGKRGGH E338X 7.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGS domainof SLKILSKGKRG E336X 8.Cterm KFKTSAQHALTSVSRGS domainof SLKILSKGK E334X
REFERENCES
[0174] Throughout this application, various references describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains. The disclosures of these references are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure. [0175] 1. Griffith, J. W., Sokol, C. L. & Luster, A. D. Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors: Positioning Cells for Host Defense and Immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 32, 659-702 (2014). [0176] 2. Kawai, T. & Malech, H. L. WHIM syndrome: congenital immune deficiency disease. Current Opinion in Hematology 16, 20-26 (2009). [0177] 3. Hernandez, P. A. et al. Mutations in the chemokine receptor gene CXCR4 are associated with WHIM syndrome, a combined immunodeficiency disease. Nat Genet 34, 70-74 (2003). [0178] 4. Liu, Q. et al. WHIM syndrome caused by a single amino acid substitution in the carboxy-tail of chemokine receptor CXCR4. Blood 120, 181-189 (2012). [0179] 5. Balabanian, K. et al. WHIM syndromes with different genetic anomalies are accounted for by impaired CXCR4 desensitization to CXCL12. Blood 105, 2449-2457 (2005). [0180] 6. Balabanian, K. et al. Proper desensitization of CXCR4 is required for lymphocyte development and peripheral compartmentalization in mice. Blood 119, 5722-5730 (2012). [0181] 7. Gulino, A. V. Altered leukocyte response to CXCL12 in patients with warts hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome. Blood 104, 444-452 (2004). [0182] 8. Schulz, O., Hammerschmidt, S. I., Moschovakis, G. L. & Frster, R. Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors in Lymphoid Tissue Dynamics. Annu Rev Immunol 34, annurev-immunol-041015-055649 (2014). [0183] 9. Lim, K. et al. Neutrophil trails guide influenza-specific CD8+ T cells in the airways. Science 349, aaa4352-aaa4352 (2015). [0184] 10. O'Hayre, M., Salanga, C. L., Handel, T. M. & Allen, S. J. Chemokines and cancer: migration, intracellular signalling and intercellular communication in the microenvironment. Biochem. J. 409, 635-649 (2008). [0185] 11. Gorlin, R. J. et al. WHIM syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder: clinical, hematological, and molecular studies. Am. J. Med. Genet. 91, 368-376 (2000). [0186] 12. Guire, P. J. M., Cunningham-Rundles, C., Ochs, H. & Diaz, G. A. Oligoclonality, impaired class switch and B-cell memory responses in WHIM syndrome. Clinical Immunology 135, 412-421 (2010). [0187] 13. Badolato, R., Donadieu, J.WHIM Research Group. How I treat warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis syndrome. Blood 130, 2491-2498 (2017). [0188] 14. Biajoux, V. et al. Efficient Plasma Cell Differentiation and Trafficking Require Cxcr4 Desensitization. CellReports 17, 193-205 (2016). [0189] 15. Lian, J. & Luster, A. D. ScienceDirectChemokine-guided cell positioning in the lymph node orchestrates the generation of adaptive immune responses. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 36, 1-6 (2015). [0190] 16. Brinza, L. et al. Immune signatures of protectivespleen memory CD8 T cells. Sci. Rep. 1-12 (2016). doi:10.1038/srep37651 [0191] 17. Ariotti, S. et al. T cell memory. Skin-resident memory CD8.sup.+ T cells trigger a state of tissue-wide pathogen alert. Science 346, 101-105 (2014). [0192] 18. Chaix, J. et al. Cutting Edge: CXCR4 Is Critical for CD8+Memory T Cell Homeostatic Self-Renewal but Not Rechallenge Self-Renewal. J Immunol 193, 1013-1016 (2014). [0193] 19. Mazo, I. B. et al. Bone Marrow Is a Major Reservoir and Site of Recruitment for Central Memory CD8+ T Cells. Immunity 22, 259-270 (2005). [0194] 20. Panetta, E. et al. CD8 Cell Division Maintaining Cytotoxic Memory Occurs Predominantly in the Bone Marrow. J Immunol 174, 7654-7664 (2005). [0195] 21. Sercan Alp, . et al. Memory CD8+ T cells colocalize with IL-7+stromal cells in bone marrow and rest in terms of proliferation and transcription. Eur J Immunol 45, 975-987 (2015). [0196] 22. Di Rosa, F. Two Niches in the Bone Marrow: A Hypothesis onLife-long T Cell Memory. Trends Immunol 37, 503-512 (2016). [0197] 23. Alp, O. S. & Radbruch, A. The lifestyle of memory CD8(+) T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 16, 271 (2016). [0198] 24. Dotta, L., Tassone, L. & Badolato, R. Clinical and genetic features of Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections and Myelokathexis (WHIM) syndrome. Curr. Mol. Med. 11, 317-325 (2011). [0199] 25. Mamalaki, C. et al. Positive and negative selection in transgenic mice expressing a T-cell receptor specific for influenza nucleoprotein and endogenous superantigen. Dev Immunol 3, 159-174 (1992). [0200] 26. Anderson, K. G. et al. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat Protoc 9, 209-222 (2014). [0201] 27. Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096-1098 (2013). [0202] 28. van der Woude, L. L., Gorris, M. A. J., Halilovic, A., Figdor, C. G. & de Vries, I. J. M. Migrating into the Tumor: a Roadmap for T Cells. TRENDS in CANCER 3, 797-808 (2017). [0203] 29. Feinberg, D., Paul, B. & Kang, Y. The promise of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in multiple myeloma. Cellular Immunology 103964 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2019.103964 [0204] 30. Ghorashian, S. et al. Enhanced CAR T cell expansion and prolonged persistence in pediatric patients with ALL treated with a low-affinity CD19 CAR. Nat Med 1-23 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0549-5 [0205] 31. Khan, A. B. et al. Redirection to the bone marrow improves T cell persistence and antitumor functions. J Clin Invest 128, 2010-2024 (2018). [0206] 32. Barber, D. L. et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature 439, 682-687 (2005).