Crankshaft and method of manufacture
11905992 ยท 2024-02-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Jianghuai Yang (Rochester Hills, MI, US)
- James D. Cremonesi (Rochester Hills, MI, US)
- Paul J. Gelazin (Clarkston, MI, US)
- Qigui Wang (Rochester Hills, MI)
- Daniel J. Wilson (Linden, MI, US)
Cpc classification
F16C3/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y10T29/49286
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F16C3/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2223/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2204/62
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C21D1/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F16C2202/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F16C2204/64
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F16C3/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C21D1/18
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A method for manufacturing a crankshaft for an internal combustion engine with a plurality of journals having a hardened case with a first microstructure. The crankshaft is comprised of a steel comprising between about 0.3 wt % and 0.77 wt % Carbon. The first microstructure of the hardened case of the journals comprises between about 15% and 30% ferrite and a balance of martensite and the resultant subsurface residual stress between 310 MPa and 620 MPa.
Claims
1. A crankshaft for an internal combustion engine, the crankshaft comprising: a plurality of journals each comprising a surface and a hardened case, and wherein the crankshaft is made of a steel comprising between 0.3 wt % and 0.77 wt % Carbon and the hardened case has a first microstructure comprising ferrite and martensite having a residual stress between 400 MPa and 550 MPa, and wherein the plurality of journals have been heated to an intercritical temperature of between 724 C. and 822 C.
2. The crankshaft of claim 1 wherein the surface of the plurality of journals comprises a surface hardness between HRC 40 and 50.
3. The crankshaft of claim 1 wherein the first microstructure comprises up to 50% ferrite.
4. The crankshaft of claim 3 wherein the first microstructure comprises between 15% and 30% ferrite.
5. The crankshaft of claim 1 wherein the steel comprises 0.38 wt % Carbon.
6. The crankshaft of claim 1 wherein the surface of the main journal has been cooled at a cooling rate between 15 to 20 C./sec.
7. The crankshaft of claim 1 wherein the hardened case has a microstructure comprising between 15% and 30% ferrite with the balance martensite.
8. A crankshaft for an internal combustion engine, the crankshaft comprising: a main journal having a surface and a hardened case, wherein the hardened case penetrates into the main journal from the surface to a depth, wherein the main journal is comprised of steel having between 0.3 wt % and 0.77 wt % Carbon, and wherein the surface of the main journal has been heated to an intercritical temperature of between 724 C. and 822 C. and the surface of the main journal has been cooled at a cooling rate between 15 to 20 C./sec.
9. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the steel comprises 0.38 wt % Carbon.
10. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the crankshaft comprises residual stress between 310 MPa and 620 Mpa.
11. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the surface of the plurality of journals comprises a surface hardness between HRC 40 and 50.
12. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the first microstructure comprises up to 50% ferrite.
13. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the residual stress is between 400 MPa and 550 MPa.
14. The crankshaft of claim 8 wherein the steel comprises 0.38 wt % Carbon.
15. A crankshaft for an internal combustion engine, the crankshaft comprising: a main journal having a surface and a hardened case, wherein the hardened case penetrates into the main journal from the surface to a depth, wherein the main journal is comprised of steel having between 0.3 wt % and 0.77 wt % Carbon, and wherein the surface of the main journal has been heated to an intercritical temperature of between 724 C. and 822 C. and the surface of the main journal has been cooled such that the hardened case has a microstructure comprising between 15 wt % and 30 wt % ferrite with the balance of martensite.
16. The crankshaft of claim 15, wherein the surface of the main journal has been cooled at a cooling rate between 15 to 20 C./sec.
17. The crankshaft of claim 15 wherein the residual stress is between 400 MPa and 550 MPa.
18. The crankshaft of claim 15 wherein the steel comprises 0.38 wt % Carbon.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DESCRIPTION
(9) Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numbers refer to like components, in
(10) One of the challenges in manufacturing the crankshaft 10 to these specifications is that the existing process for hardening causes excessive residual stresses in the surrounding material. As can be seen in
(11) Referring now to
(12) A key concept employed to understand characteristics of a system is knowing the percentage of the phases at equilibrium for a particular Carbon content and temperature of the system. Using a lever rule calculation, the amount of a particular phase present at equilibrium of a particular alloy Carbon content and temperature can be found. For example, at a temperature of 780 C. of T.sub.1 for 1538MV steel (C content=0.38 wt %) the following equation provides the ferrite and austenite phase percentage:
(13)
with a=carbon content at the solidus line 38 between + and phases at 780 C. of T.sub.1 and e=carbon content at the solidus line 40 between + and phases at 780 C. of T.sub.1. The balance is 70% austenite . Thus, comparing the fraction of austenite at 780 C. of T.sub.1 to that of the 100% austenite above the critical temperature 42 of 822 C., there is a 30% reduction in the amount of austenite . Therefore, when the system is quenched at a cooling rate of about 15 to 20 C./sec the amount of austenite that is transformed to martensite is reduced by 30% with 30% undissolved ferrite a remaining. This results in a 30% reduction in residual stress occurring from the transformation of austenite to martensite.
(14) In another example of the present disclosure, at a temperature of 810 C. of T.sub.2 for 1538MV steel (C content=0.38 wt %) the following equation provides the ferrite and austenite phase percentage:
(15)
with b=carbon content at the solidus line 38 between + and phases at 810 C. T.sub.2 and f=carbon content at the solidus line 40 between + and phases at 810 C. of T.sub.2. The balance is 85% austenite . Thus, comparing the fraction of austenite at 810 C. of T.sub.2 to that of the 100% austenite above the critical temperature 42 of 822 C., there is a 15% reduction in the amount of austenite . As a result, heating the system to between 780 C. (T.sub.1) and 810 C. (T.sub.2) followed by a quench at a cooling rate of about 15 to 20 C./sec provides a reduction of residual stress between 15% and 30%. Additional benefits that result from the method 100 include a reduction in thermal impact and additional undissolved ferrite to be compressed and relieve additional residual stress caused by the transformation of austenite to martensite. Furthermore, since the purpose of the method is to increase surface hardness of specific portions of the crankshaft the surface hardness of the treated portions are between about HRC 42 and 53 (surface hardness of 100% martensite 1538MV is above HRC 58).
(16) Continuing with a second step 104 of the method 100, the main journals 12 and rod journals 14 of the crankshaft 10 are heated to an intercritical temperature. The intercritical temperature is defined as a temperature between the eutectic temperature 36 of 727 C. and the temperature of the solidus line 38 between + and phases. In this manner, not all of the heated portion would contain 100% austenite . In the present example, the intercritical temperature is between 780 C. (T.sub.1) and 810 C. (T.sub.2). Heating of the crankshaft 10 is accomplished with induction or laser heating. However, other methods of localized heating may be used without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Additionally, the temperatures used in the present example may be expanded to include temperatures between the intercritical temperatures Ac.sub.1 and Ac.sub.3 or just above the eutectic temperature 36 of 727 C. and just below the temperature of the solidus line 38 between + and phases. Of course, when heating the crankshaft 10 to higher temperatures the resultant percentage of residual stress reduction is reduced due to a higher percentage of martensite. The residual stress of a fully hardened, 100% martensite is about 620 MPa as analyzed with x-ray diffraction method. The residual stress in a crankshaft 10 having 85% martensite is about 527 MPa. Similarly, the residual stress in a crankshaft 10 having 70% martensite is about 415 MPa.
(17) A third step 106 of the method 100 includes quenching the main journals 12 and rod journals 14 of the crankshaft 10 achieving cooling rate of about 15 to 20 C./sec. The cooling rate can be achieved using an oil or polymer solution quenching medium.
(18) A fourth step 108 of the method includes low temperature tempering the crankshaft 10. Tempering involves heating the crankshaft to below 727 C. then cooling. After tempering, the surface hardness of the main journals 12 and rod journals 14 is between HRC 40 and 50.
(19) While examples have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this disclosure relates will recognize various alternative designs and examples for practicing the disclosed method within the scope of the appended claims.