METHOD FOR TREATING WATER
20240051849 ยท 2024-02-15
Inventors
- Christopher Paul NEWMAN (Canterbury Kent, GB)
- Spencer Edwin TAYLOR (Camberley Surrey, GB)
- Nicholas James ROTH (Kibworth Leicestershire, GB)
- Roderick Clive GASKIN (Hempstead, Gillingham Kent, GB)
- Gayathri Devi ARIARATNAM (Hulland Ward, Ashbourne Derbyshire, GB)
Cpc classification
C02F2307/12
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F2301/08
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/321
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F2103/007
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F1/288
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01D37/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J20/3255
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C02F2305/04
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F1/001
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J20/261
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01J20/26
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method of removing microplastic particles from a water-based liquid, comprising the exposure of the liquid to a solid surface on which is retained a sorbitan monooleate surfactant, in a concentration suitable for entrapping substantially all microplastic particles. The method is useful for removing microplastic particles and microfibres from fresh and saline natural waters, effluent water, such as grey water, storm water and waste waters from industrial processes, in addition to any kind of product based on water, such as mineral waters, milk, fruit juices, beverages, pharmaceutical and veterinary products.
Claims
1. A method of removing microplastic particles from a water-based liquid, comprising exposing the liquid to a solid surface on which is retained sorbitan monooleate surfactant, in a concentration suitable for entrapping substantially all microplastic particles.
2. The method according to claim 1, in which the microparticles have a maximum dimension of 5 mm.
3. The method according to claim 2, in which the microparticles have a size range of 1-100 microns.
4. The method according to claim 2, in which the microparticles have an aspect ratio of 0.2 maximum.
5. The method according to claim 1, in which the microparticles at least partially comprise synthetic organic polymer.
6. The method according to claim 3, in which the microparticles are completely synthetic organic polymer.
7. The method according to claim 4, in which the polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyester, acrylic, polyalkylene, polyamide, polyurethane, PET, and combinations thereof.
8. The method according to claim 1, in which the microplastic particles are microfibres.
9. (canceled)
10. (canceled)
11. A solid surface that is adapted to be immersed in a microplastic particle-containing liquid and which is adapted to retain on said surface substantially all microplastic particles present, there being retained on the surface sorbitan monooleate surfactant in a concentration adapted to retain the microplastic particles.
12. The solid surface according to claim 11, which surface is a synthetic polymer.
13. A filtration device, comprising at least two liquid/solid separation stages, at least one conventional liquid/solid separation stage and at least one surfactant-bearing surface according to claim 11.
14. A method of filtering a microparticle-containing aqueous liquid, comprising at least two liquid/solid separation stages, at least one conventional liquid/solid separation stage, preceded by at least one stage comprising a surfactant-bearing surface according to claim 11.
15. A method of reducing microparticle pollution in large bodies of water, comprising the deployment therein of porous barriers comprising surfaces according to claim 11.
16. The method according to claim 3, in which the microparticles have a size range of microns.
17. The method according to claim 3, in which the microparticles have a size range of microns.
Description
[0062]
[0063]
[0064] It can clearly be seen that the treated polycaprolactone picks up microfibres, whereas the untreated polycaprolactone does not.