Method and system for inspection of joints in composite pipes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines

Abstract

The present disclosure is related to techniques for the inspection of joints and repairs in pipelines. In this scenario, the a method is provided for the inspection of joints in composite pipes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, comprising the steps of (i) emitting a series of acoustic wave pulses, at different frequencies, from a collar of acoustic transducers positioned at a predetermined distance from a joint or repair to be inspected, (ii) recording, in a time interval subsequent to the emission, echoes of wave displacements to the repair or joint in each of the transducers in the form of an A-Scan, and (iii) generating a flattened C-Scan image, through a CSM, for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers. The disclosure further provides a system for inspection of joints in composite pipes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines associated with the provided method.

Claims

1. A method for inspection of joints in composite tubes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, comprising: emitting a series of acoustic wave pulses, at different frequencies, from a collar of acoustic transducers positioned at a predetermined distance from a joint or a repair to be inspected; recording, during a time interval subsequent to the emission, echoes of wave displacements to the repair or the joint in each of the transducers of the collar of acoustic transducers in the form of an A-Scan; generating a flattened C-Scan image, through a common source method (CSM), for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers; and circumferentially evaluating a particular defect revealed by the flattened C-Scan image using a predetermined threshold of comparison, in which: a number of channels reaching the threshold are counted; and a percentage value of a circumferential extent of the defect is counted based on a quantity of channels that reach the threshold.

2. The method, in accordance with claim 1, wherein generating the flattened C-Scan image comprises processing A-Scan data via back-propagation of captured acoustic waves back to positions from which the captured acoustic waves originated using prior knowledge of dispersion curves of a waveguide used.

3. The method, in accordance with claim 1, further comprising longitudinally evaluating the particular defect, in which: all of the A-Scans in the different pulse frequencies are added to obtain a sum; the obtained sum is transformed to a frequency domain where a distance between local minima of a curve corresponds inversely to a longitudinal extension between reflections; and a minimum longitudinal size of the defect is calculated based on a width of a frequency range used in the emission.

4. A system for inspection of joints in composite tubes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, comprising: a collar of acoustic transducers positioned at a predetermined distance from a joint or a repair to be inspected, and adapted to emit a series of acoustic wave pulses at different frequencies; means of recording, during a time interval subsequent to the emission, wave displacements in each of the transducers of the collar of acoustic transducers in the form of an A-Scan; and means of generating a flattened C-Scan image, through a common source method (CSM), for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers, and of circumferentially evaluating a particular defect revealed by the flattened C-Scan image using a predetermined threshold of comparison, in which: a number of channels reaching the threshold are counted; and a percentage value of a circumferential extent of the defect is counted based on a quantity of channels that reach the threshold.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

(1) The detailed description presented below makes reference to the attached figures and their respective reference numbers.

(2) FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of the system of the present disclosure applied to a polymeric or composite repair in a metallic pipeline.

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic view of the system of the present disclosure applied to a joint in a polymeric or composite pipeline.

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates a graph of intensity versus time resulting from collection of the echoes of the mechanical waves by means of the system of the present disclosure, known as A-S can.

(5) FIG. 4 illustrates a graph of phase velocity versus frequency showing the dispersion curves for a polymeric pipe joint reinforced with fiberglass.

(6) FIG. 5 illustrates a C-Scan type result of angular position versus distance.

(7) FIG. 6 illustrates the steps of evaluation of the circumferential extent of a defect in accordance with the method of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(8) Preliminarily, it is emphasized that the description that follows will start from a preferred embodiment of the invention. As will be evident to any person skilled in the art, however, the invention is not limited to this particular embodiment.

(9) FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic view of the system of the present disclosure applied to a polymeric or composite repair 1 in a metallic pipeline 2. FIG. 2, in turn, illustrates a schematic view of the system of the present disclosure applied to a threaded or taped joint 5 in a polymeric or composite pipeline 6.

(10) The system for inspection of joints in composite pipes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, will comprise a collar of acoustic transducers 4 positioned at a predetermined distance from the joint 5 or repair 1 to be inspected. Preferably, the transducers used in the collar of acoustic transducers 4 are piezoelectric transducers.

(11) Preferably, the predetermined distance is of up to 10 meters. More preferably, the predetermined distance is from 1 to 5 meters.

(12) The collar of acoustic transducers 4 is adapted to emit a series of acoustic wave pulses at different frequencies. The pulses are preferably emitted in a controlled way, followed by time intervals in which recordings are made of the echoes of the wave displacements to the repair or joint in each of the transducers. Thus, the recordings are taken in a time interval subsequent to the emission, being stored in the form of A-Scan (FIG. 3).

(13) Preferably, the series of pulse emissions should be realized with different emission frequencies to attain a specific band of frequencies. Preferably, the frequency band attained ranges from 10 kHz to 70 kHz.

(14) The measurements of all the transducer elements of the collar are collected and stored in the form of A-Scans for the application of the methods of localization and evaluation of the defect.

(15) The data in the form of A-Scan are then processed in order to back-propagate the captured waves back to the positions from which they originated using prior knowledge of the dispersion curves of the waveguide used. FIG. 4, for example, illustrates a graph of phase velocity versus frequency showing the dispersion curves for a polymeric pipe joint reinforced with fiberglass.

(16) Preferably, the method utilized for processing the A-Scan data is the Common Source Method (CSM), widely disseminated in the prior art for the treatment of data in non-destructive tests. The application of the CSM results in a C-Scan, which is a flattened image of the sound sources of the pipeline. FIG. 5 illustrates an example of a C-Scan, consisting of the axes of angular position versus distance.

(17) Preferably, a flattened C-Scan image is generated for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers 4.

(18) The analysis of the C-Scan images generated permits the identification of points of interest in the area inspected. After the localization of a possible defect using the C-Scan image, the longitudinal and circumferential positions of the defect on the surface of the pipeline are used to cut part of the A-Scan data, in which two methods of evaluating the size of the defect are applied.

(19) For the evaluation of the circumferential extent of a possible defect, a comparison threshold is used and the number of channels reaching this threshold is counted, and then the percentage value of the circumferential extent of the defect is counted, as shown in FIG. 6.

(20) For the evaluation of the longitudinal extent of the defect, it is necessary to use all of the A-Scans in the different pulse frequencies, added and transformed to the frequency domain where the distance between local minima of that curve corresponds inversely to the longitudinal extent between reflections, and therefore of the defect. The width of the frequency range utilized in the emission is linked to the minimum longitudinal size of the defect that will be able to be observed by the method.

(21) The present disclosure further provides a system for inspection of joints in composite pipes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines associated with the method described above. The system will comprise: (i) a collar of acoustic transducers 4 positioned at a predetermined distance from the joint 5 or repair 1 to be inspected, adapted to emit a series of acoustic wave pulses at different frequencies; (ii) means of registering, in a time interval subsequent to the emission, the wave displacements in each of the transducers of the collar of acoustic transducers 4 in the form of A-Scan; (iii) means of generating a flattened C-Scan image, through the CSM method, for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers 4.

(22) Thus, the present disclosure provides a fairly simple and practical method and system of non-destructive testing, which can be applied to joints in composite pipes as well as in composite repairs in metallic pipelines.

(23) Countless variations covered in the scope of protection of the present application are allowed. Thus, it is emphasized that the present disclosure is not limited to the specific configurations/embodiments described above.

(24) The following examples are illustrative only and may be combined with aspects of other embodiments or teachings described herein, without limitation.

(25) Example 1 is a method for the inspection of joints in composite tubes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, comprising the steps of: emitting a series of acoustic wave pulses, at different frequencies, from a collar of acoustic transducers positioned at a predetermined distance from a joint or a repair to be inspected; recording, in a time interval subsequent to the emission, echoes of wave displacements to the repair or the joint in each of the transducers of the collar of acoustic transducers in the form of an A-Scan; and generating a flattened C-Scan image, through a common source method (CSM), for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers.

(26) Example 2 is the method of Example 1, the step of generating the flattened C-Scan image comprising processing A-Scan data via back-propagation of captured acoustic waves back to positions from which the captured acoustic waves originated using prior knowledge of dispersion curves of a waveguide used.

(27) Example 3 is the method of Examples 1 or 2, further comprising the step of circumferentially evaluating a particular defect revealed by the flattened C-Scan image using a predetermined threshold of comparison, in which: a number of channels reaching the threshold are counted; and a percentage value of a circumferential extent of the defect is counted based on a quantity of channels that reach the threshold.

(28) Example 4 is the method of any of Examples 1 to 3, further comprising the step of longitudinally evaluating a particular defect, in which: all of the A-Scans in the different pulse frequencies are added to obtain a sum; the obtained sum is transformed to a frequency domain where a distance between local minima of a curve corresponds inversely to a longitudinal extension between reflections; and a minimum longitudinal size of the defect is calculated based on a width of a frequency range used in the emission.

(29) Example 5 is a system for inspection of joints in composite tubes and of composite repairs in metallic pipelines, comprising: a collar of acoustic transducers positioned at a predetermined distance from a joint or a repair to be inspected, and adapted to emit a series of acoustic wave pulses at different frequencies; means of recording, in a time interval subsequent to the emission, wave displacements in each of the transducers of the collar of acoustic transducers in the form of an A-Scan; and means of generating a flattened C-Scan image, through a common source method (CSM), for each frequency of pulse emission from the collar of acoustic transducers.