LIQUID APPLIED SOUND DAMPENING COMPOSITION

Abstract

The present invention relates to a composition comprising an aqueous dispersion of acrylic polymer particles; paraffin wax; graphite particles; and extender particles. The composition is useful for making coatings with low water pickup for liquid applied sound damping applications.

Claims

1. A composition comprising an aqueous dispersion of acrylic polymer particles having a z-average particle size in the range of from 50 nm to 500 nm, and a calculated T.sub.g in the range of from 25 C. to 30 C.; paraffin wax; extender particles; and a rheology modifier; wherein the pigment volume concentration of the composition is in the range of from 40 to 70; and wherein the composition has a Brookfield viscosity in the range of from 200,000 cP to 20,000,000 cP when not under shear conditions.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the concentration of acrylic polymer particles is in the range of from 10 to 25 weight percent, based on the weight of the composition; and the concentration of paraffin wax is in the range of from 1 to 15 percent, based on the weight of the acrylic polymer particles.

3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the acrylic polymer particles have a calculated T.sub.g in the range of from 10 C. to 20 C., and comprise structural units of methyl methacrylate and one or more monomers selected from the group consisting of ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, and 2-propylheptyl acrylate; and wherein the composition has a Brookfield viscosity in the range of from 1,000,000 cP to 10,000,000 cP.

4. The composition of claim 3 wherein the acrylic polymer particles further comprise structural units of phosphoethyl methacrylate.

5. The composition of claim 2 which further comprises from 150 to 1500 repeat units of a polyethylene or polypropylene wax, wherein the weight-to-weight ratio of the polyethylene or polypropylene wax to the paraffin wax is in the range of from 5 to 35 weight percent, based on the weight of the paraffin wax and the polyethylene or the polypropylene wax.

6. The composition of claim 3 which further comprises from 150 to 1500 repeat units of a polyethylene wax, wherein the weight-to-weight ratio of the polyethylene wax to the paraffin wax is in the range of from 5 to 35 weight percent, based on the weight of the paraffin wax and the polyethylene wax.

7. The composition of claim 3 wherein the extender particles are calcium carbonate particles.

8. The composition of claim 1 which comprises less than 5 PVC levels of an opacifying pigment.

9. The composition of claim 2 wherein the polymer particles have a number average molecular weight in the range of from 10,000 to 40,000 g/mol.

10. The composition of claim 1 which further comprises potato starch.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0004] The present invention is a composition comprising an aqueous dispersion of acrylic polymer particles having a z-average particle size in the range of from 50 nm to 500 nm, and a calculated T.sub.g in the range of from 25 C. to 30 C.; paraffin wax; extender particles; and a rheology modifier wherein the pigment volume concentration of the composition is in the range of from 40 to 70; wherein the composition has a Brookfield viscosity in the range of from 200,000 cP to cP when not under shear conditions.

[0005] As used herein, the term acrylic polymer particles (alternatively, acrylic latex particles) refers to acrylic or styrene-acrylic polymer particles. The polymer particles are preferably film-forming at ambient temperature; accordingly, the polymer particles preferably have a T.sub.g, as calculated by the Fox equation, of not greater than 30 C., preferably not greater than 20 C., and more preferably not greater than 5 C.; and not less than 25 C., more preferably not less than 10 C. Preferably, the polymer particles comprise structural units of methyl methacrylate (MMA, T.sub.g=105 C.) or styrene (STY, T.sub.g=100 C.), and at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of ethyl acrylate (EA, T.sub.g=22 C.), butyl acrylate (BA, T.sub.g=54 C.), 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (2-EHA, T.sub.g=70 C.), and 2-propylheptyl acrylate (2-PHA. T.sub.g=68 C.).

[0006] The term structural unit is used herein to describe the remnant of the recited monomer after polymerization. For example, a structural unit of MMA is as illustrated:

##STR00001## [0007] where the dotted lines represent the points of attachment of the structural unit to the polymer backbone.

[0008] The polymer particles preferably comprise from 0.1, more preferably from 0.2, and most preferably from 0.3 weight percent, to 6, more preferably to 4, and most preferably to 3 weight percent structural units of an ethylenically unsaturated acid monomer such as a carboxylic acid monomer and a phosphorus acid monomer. Examples of suitable carboxylic acid monomers include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and itaconic acid; examples of suitable phosphorus acid monomers include a phosphonate or dihydrogen phosphate ester of an alcohol in which the alcohol contains or is substituted with a polymerizable vinyl or olefinic group. Preferred dihydrogen phosphate esters are phosphates of hydroxyalkyl acrylates or methacrylates, including phosphoethyl methacrylate (PEM) and phosphopropyl methacrylates.

[0009] The concentration of polymer particles is preferably in the range of from 10 to 25 weight percent, based on the weight of the composition. The acrylic polymer particles preferably have a z-average particle size in the range of from 80 nm to 250 nm, as measured by dynamic light scattering. In one aspect, the acrylic polymers have a number average molecular weight in the range of from 10,000 to 40,000 g/mol as measured by gel permeation chromatography detailed hereinbelow.

[0010] Paraffin wax is a polyethylene with from 10 to 40 ethylene repeat units:

(CH.sub.2CH.sub.2).sub.n, [0011] where n is from 10 to 40. The concentration of the paraffin wax is preferably in the range of from 1, more preferably from 2, and most preferably from 3 weight percent, to preferably 15, more preferably to 10 weight percent, based on the weight of the polymer particles. Commercial examples of suitable paraffin waxes include Michem emulsion 47950, Michem lube 723, and Aquacer emulsion 593, which are paraffin wax aqueous emulsions stabilized with a nonionic surfactant.

[0012] The composition may further comprise a higher molecular weight (150 to 1500 repeat units) polyethylene (PE) or polypropylene (PP) wax. The concentration of the higher molecular weight PE or PP, if used at all, is preferably in the range of from 5 to 35 weight percent, based on the weight of paraffin wax and the higher molecular weight polyethylene or polypropylene wax. Commercial examples of paraffin wax/PE blend emulsions include Michem 62330 and Michem 66035 paraffin wax/PE wax blend emulsions.

[0013] The composition further comprises extender particles, which typically have a median diameter average (D.sub.50) particle size in the range of from 1 m to 50 m. Examples of suitable extenders, also referred to in the art as fillers, include calcium carbonate; silica; alumina; kaolin; clay; talc; graphite; mica; diatomaceous earth; glass powder, fibers, or microspheres; aluminum hydroxide; perlite; barium sulfate; magnesium carbonate; calcium dihydrate; rock wool; Wollastonite; zeolite; ceramic and thermoplastic microspheres; polymeric fibers, and crosslinked rubber particles. The pigment volume concentration (PVC) of the composition is in the range of from preferably from 50, to 70, preferably to 65. PVC is calculated using the following formula:

[00001]$\mathrm{PVC}=\left[\frac{\mathrm{Vol}\left(\mathrm{Pigment}+\mathrm{Extender}\right)}{\mathrm{Vol}(\mathrm{Pigment}+\mathrm{Extender}+\mathrm{Binder}\mathrm{Solids}}\right]100$ [0014] where pigment refers to an opacifying pigment such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide and zirconium oxide; and binder solids refers to the contribution of polymer from the aqueous dispersion of the polymer particles that bind the opacifying pigment and extender particles together. The composition preferably comprises less than 5 PVC, more preferably 0 PVC of an opacifying pigment. The composition advantageously includes other additives such as rheology modifiers, defoamers, surfactants, and potato starch.

[0015] As the following examples demonstrate, coatings arising from the composition of the present invention show a marked reduction in water sensitivity, which is particularly of interest in LASD applications.

[0016] Gel Permeation Chromatographic Method of Measuring M.sub.n of Polymer Particles

[0017] GPC samples were prepared in THF at a concentration of 5 mg/mL based on the polymer solids content. The sample solutions were kept on a flatbed shaker at room temperature overnight, then filtered through a 0.45 m PTFE filter (Whatman) prior to GPC analysis. The GPC instrument setup consisted of an Agilent 1200 series HPLC system (degasser, pump, autosampler), and a Wyatt T-rEX refractive index detector. The polymer separation was carried out on a column set that consisted of one TOSOH TSKgel GMH.sub.xl-L and one TOSOH TSKgel G50001-H.sub.xl column (each packed with 9 m styrene divinylbenzene gels; each dimension: 7.5 mm ID30 cm) using THF as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min; the injection volume was 40 L.

[0018] Astra 7 software (Wyatt Technology) was used for data acquisition and processing. M.sub.n and M.sub.w were calculated using a conventional calibration method based on polystyrene standards (Agilent Technology) as shown in Table 1 below:

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Polystyrene Standard Peak PS mixA1 (g/mol) PSmixB1 (g/mol) 1 6,035,000 2,698,000 2 597,500 290,300 3 126,000 69,650 4 30,230 9,960 5 2,970 580

[0019] The number- and weight-average molecular weight were obtained based on the polystyrene calibration curve and sample elution profile by equations:

[00002]$M_n=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^N{h}_i}{{.Math.}_{i=1}^N\left(h_i/M_i\right)}{M}_w=\frac{{.Math.}_{i=1}^N\left(h_i{M}_i\right)}{{.Math.}_{i=1}^N{h}_i}$

[0020] Where h.sub.i is the GPC curve height at the ith volume increment and the M.sub.i is the molecular weight of the species eluted at the ith retention volume based on polystyrene calibration curve.

[0021] Coating formulations containing paraffin wax or blend of paraffin wax and polyethylene were prepared from the components shown in Table 2 in the order listed. The components were mixed with an overhead stirrer for 10 min, then allowed to equilibrate overnight. The waxes were added at 6.4 weight % based on the weight of binder solids. The comparative example, which was prepared without wax (Table 3) used the same formulation, but replaced the wax solids with additional binder solids. Binder refers to a 50.5% solids BA 55/MMA 42/PEM 3 latex with an M.sub.n of 21,000 g/mol. (PEM has an activity of 60%.) Density refers to dry density. TERGITOL, TAMOL, and ACRYSOL are Trademarks of The Dow Chemical Company or Its Affiliates. Expancel 031 WUF 40 refers to Expancel 031 WUF 40 Thermoplastic Microspheres.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Coating Formulation with Wax Solids Density Component Mass (g) (%) (g/cm.sup.3) Binder (BA 55/MMA 42/PEM 3) 27.04 50.5 1.1 Wax Emulsion (solids) 0.87 30-50 0.9 TAMOL 1254 Dispersant 0.96 35 2.1 TERGITOL 15-S-40 Nonionic Surfactant 0.1 50 1.2 Bayferrox 318M Colorant 0.2 100 4.6 Titan 200 Calcium Carbonate 66.64 100 2.7 Kollotex 1500 Potato Starch 1.82 100 1.6 Expancel 031 WUF 40 0.15 76 1.0 ACRYSOL RM-12W Rheology Modifier 0.12 19 1.27 ACRYSOL TT-615 Rheology Modifier 0.08 30 1.23

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Coating Formulation Without Wax Solids Density Component Mass (g) (%) (g/cm.sup.3) Binder (BA 55/MMA 42/PEM 3) 28.76 50.5 1.1 TAMOL 1254 Dispersant 0.96 35 2.1 TERGITOL 15-S-40 Nonionic Surfactant 0.1 50 1.2 Bayferrox 318M Colorant 0.2 100 4.6 Titan 200 Calcium Carbonate 66.64 100 2.7 Kollotex 1500 Potato Starch 1.82 100 1.6 Expancel 031 WUF 40 0.15 76 1.0 ACRYSOL RM-12W 0.12 19 1.27 ACRYSOL TT-615 Rheology Modifier 0.08 30 1.23

[0022] Water Uptake Testing

[0023] Coatings were drawn down into 410080-mm samples on aluminum panels. The samples were then left at room temperature for 30 min and subsequently baked at 150 C. for 30 min Samples were cooled to room temperature and weighed to determine their total mass. Samples were then immersed in 10 cm of water for 48 h and weighed again. The water uptake was reported as the percentage mass difference between soaked and unsoaked samples.

[0024] Table 4 illustrates percent water pickup (% WPU) for coatings (avg. of 3 panels tested after 2 d) with and without paraffin wax. ML 190 refers to Michem Lube 190 Polyethylene Wax Emulsion; Aquacer 593 refers to Aquacer 593 Polypropylene Wax Emulsion; ML 723 refers to Michem Lube 723 Paraffin Wax Emulsion; Aquacer 497 refers to Aquacer 497 Paraffin Wax Emulsion; ME 62330 refers to Michem 62330 Paraffin Wax/PE Wax Blend Emulsion; and ML 270R refers to Michem Lube 270R Paraffin Wax/PE Wax Blend Emulsion.

[0025] Brookfield viscosity was measured at 25 C. using a Brookfield RV DV-I+viscometer with a Brookfield Helipath stand and a T-Bar type T-E spindle for coatings with viscosities between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000 centipoise (cP). A Brookfield T-Bar type T-C and Type T-F spindle may be used for viscosities between 200,000 and 1,000,000 cP, and 10,000,000 and cP, respectively. The speed of rotation of the spindle is 0.5 rpm and the spindle is run for 120 seconds (i.e., under no shear conditions) before the measurement is made. The stand allows the spindle to move down into the coating during rotation to ensure proper measurement of highly viscous materials. Viscosity is measured in centipoise (cP)10.sup.4. Table 4 illustrates water pickup data for the coatings.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Water Pickup Results for Coatings Ex. No. Wax % WPU Std. Dev. Viscosity Comp. Ex. 1 No Wax 21.49% 0.73% 450 Comp. Ex 2 ML 190 21.65% 0.48% 601 Comp. Ex 3 Aquacer 593 20.63 3.3% 405 Ex. 1 ML 723 7.61% 0.14% 888 Ex. 2 Aquacer 497 5.98% 0.09% 565 Ex. 3 ME 62330 9.50% 0.39% 925 Ex. 4 ML 270R 8.83% 0.93% 660

[0026] The data demonstrate no difference in water pickup for a coating prepared from a formulation containing PE wax (Comp. Ex. 2) and a coating prepared from a formulation containing no wax (Comp. Ex. 1). In contrast, a substantial decrease in water uptake is seen for coatings prepared from formulations containing paraffin wax (Ex. 1 and Ex. 2), as well as blends of paraffin and polyethylene waxes (Ex. 3 and Ex. 4).