Configuration and its use in process for synthesis of alkyl carbamates from alkyl alcohol and urea in a tubular reactor

Abstract

The present invention discloses an improved catalyst free process for synthesis of alkyl carbamates in an integrated system comprising a tubular reactor and a striper. The process comprises reacting urea and an alcohol in said tubular reactor under autogeneous pressure; wherein said process provides >90% selectivity towards alkyl carbamate. The mixture of urea and alcohol is N fed to the tubular reactor at a particular feed rate. The tubular reactor is heated externally under autogeneous pressure to carry out a synthesis reaction producing alkyl carbamate and ammonia. The ammonia is removed from the tubular reactor by the striper. The tubular reactor and the stripper are arranged in series to reduce the equilibrium limitations of the reaction and drive the reaction in forward direction.

Claims

1. A catalyst free process for synthesis of alkyl carbamate within an integrated system of at least one tubular reactor and a stripper in series, comprising: (1) reacting urea and an alcohol in said tubular reactor under autogenous pressure, (2) pumping the mixture of step (1) into a tubular reactor with a pump at a feed rate in the range of 2-25 ml/min; and (3) maintaining the pressure of the reactor of step (2) using a back pressure regulator mounted downstream from the tubular reactor and collecting the desired carbamate, wherein said process provides >90% selectivity towards alkyl carbamate, wherein the alcohol is selected from methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, 2-butanol, tert-butanol, pentanol, and hexanol.

2. The catalyst free process according to claim 1, wherein the temperature of the reaction mixture is in the range of 150-250 C.

3. The catalyst free process according to claim 1, wherein urea and alcohol in mole ratio 10 to 50 are fed in to the tubular reactor at a feed rate of 5-25 ml/min and a residence time less than 1 hour.

4. The catalyst free process according to claim 1, wherein said process can be carried out continuously, semi continuously or batch wise.

5. The catalyst free process according to claim 1, wherein the process further comprises reacting said alkyl carbamate with an alcohol to obtain dialkyl carbonate in said integrated system.

6. An integrated system for a catalyst free process for the synthesis of alkyl carbamate as claimed in claim 1 comprising at least one tubular reactor, heated externally, for reacting urea and alcohol and a stripper for removal of ammonia formed during the said process, wherein said tubular reactor and said stripper are arranged in series to reduce the equilibrium limitations of the reaction and drive the reaction in forward direction.

7. The integrated system according to claim 6, further comprises DMC reactor, wherein said alkyl carbamate obtained is reacted with alcohol vapors to obtain dialkyl carbonates.

8. The integrated system according to claim 6, wherein the diameter of the tubular reactors is and the length is in the range of 4 to 9 meters to achieve adequate residence time and high conversion rate of urea.

9. The integrated system according to claim 6, wherein the temperature of the tubular reactor is in the range 150-250 C.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 depicts the configuration of tubular reactorstripper.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(2) The invention will now be described in detail in connection with certain preferred and optional embodiments, so that various aspects thereof may be more fully understood and appreciated.

(3) The present invention discloses reaction process for synthesis of alkyl carbamate using urea and alcohol in a catalyst free environment and in an integrated system comprising a tubular reactor, wherein said tubular reactor is sized in such a way that it provides adequate residence time for the reaction to complete and achieve equilibrium conversion. Further, the tubular reactors are provided with stripper in series such that the ammonia formed during the reaction is drawn out under reduced pressure which enables the reversible reaction to proceed in the forward reaction and eliminates the excess use of the raw material thereby making the process cost effective.

(4) In the first embodiment, the present invention relates to a catalyst free process for synthesis of alkyl carbamate within an integrated system of at least one tubular reactor and a stripper in series, comprising reacting urea and an alcohol in said tubular reactor under autogenous pressure; wherein said process provides >90% selectivity towards alkyl carbamate.

(5) The process of the present invention further comprises synthesis of di-alkyl carbonates, a useful intermediate, by reacting the alkyl carbamate formed with an alcohol in a DMC reactor column of the integrated system with a stripper in series.

(6) In an optional embodiment, the process comprises reacting said alkyl carbamate and said di-alkyl carbonate in an additional tubular reactor with a stripper in series of the integrated system to obtain alkyl-N-alkyl carbamate with removal of carbondioxide and an alcohol which can be recycled/reused.

(7) The alcohol can be selected from, but is not limited to, methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, 2-butanol, tert-butanol, pentanol and its isomers, hexanol and its isomers, their higher homologues or their isomers.

(8) The reaction for the synthesis of alkyl carbamates can be carried out continuously, semi-continuously or batch-wise. The order of the addition of the raw materials to the reactor is not critical, and the best way to add the material can be determined in orienting experiments. Furthermore, the ammonia formed during the reaction is removed from the tubular reactor using stripper arranged in series continuously or intermittently to shift the reaction equilibrium to the product side.

(9) In an embodiment, the reaction of urea and alcohol can be performed in a single tubular reactor or in multiple tubular reactors for complete conversion of urea with 95% selectivity towards Alkyl carbamates in a residence time of less than an hour.

(10) The temperature of the process in the tubular reactor for synthesis of alkyl carbamate is maintained at 150-250 C., preferably 160-200 C. under autogenous pressure of about 5-30 bar.

(11) The ingredients urea and alcohol are fed in to the tubular reactor at a feed rate of 5-25 ml/min to obtain alkyl carbamate. The mole ratio of urea to alcohol is in the range of 10 to 50.

(12) The temperature for preparation of di-alkyl carbonate is in the range of 150 to 200 C. and pressure maintained with help of Back pressure regulator is in the range of 15 to 30 bar.

(13) The tubular reactors can be of the material that can withstand the parameters of the reaction process without corrosion, crumbling and no reactivity towards the raw material used. Typically, the tubular reactors are sized in such a way that it provides adequate residence time and achieves equilibrium conversion. The dimensions of the tubular reactor are preferably 0.5 inch in diameter and 4 m-9 m in length.

(14) In another embodiment, the present invention provides a configuration/integrated system wherein second stripper can be avoided, or second reactor can be attached to the reactor for the synthesis of Di alky carbonate in the next step.

(15) Accordingly, referring to FIG. 1, the integrated system of the present invention comprises:

(16) A urea feeding tank (1) connected to the Methyl carbamate reactor or tubular reactor (2), joining to the stripper (3) and a methanol holding/feeding tank (6), connected to an evaporator (7), leading to a connection to the stripper (3).

(17) In another embodiment, the catalyst free process for the synthesis of alkyl carbamate using an integrated system comprising at least one tubular column and a stripper in series, comprises the steps of: a. Dissolving urea into methanol to obtain homogeneous mixture solution; b. Pumping the mixture of step (a) into a tubular reactor of outer diameter and 4-9 m in length with the help of HPLC pump at a temperature maintained in the range of 170 to 180 C. at a feed rate in the range of 2-25 ml/min for a period of about an hour; Maintaining the pressure of the reactor of step (b) in the range of 15-30 bar with the help of a back pressure regulator mounted downstream of tubular reactor and collecting the desired carbamate and c. Stripping the ammonia through the stripper arranged in series with tubular reactor.

(18) In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process wherein the urea conversion is >50% and alkyl carbamate selectivity is >80%; preferably >92%

(19) The above process is shown below in Scheme 1:

(20) ##STR00001##

(21) The disclosed arrangement is shown in FIG. 1. Urea is dissolved in alcohol in the ureamethanol feed vessel (1). The mixture is fed to the tubular reactor (2) at a particular feed rate. The tubular reactor (2) is heated externally under autogenous pressure to carry out a synthesis reaction producing alkyl carbamate and ammonia. The ammonia is removed from the tubular reactor (2) by means of the striper (3). The tubular reactor (2) and the stripper (3) are arranged in series to reduce the equilibrium limitations of the reaction and drive the reaction in forward direction. Alkyl carbamate obtained from the tubular reactor (2) is reacted with alcohol vapors in the DMC reactor (5) to obtain dialkyl carbonates. The alcohol vapors are obtained from the DMC reactor (5), arranged below the reactive distillation column (4), where the superheated alcohol is received from the alcohol feed vessel (6) and heated by the alcohol preheater and vaporizer (7). Dialkyl carbonate produced in the reaction in the distillation column (4) is collected in the top vessel (8) whereas the by products produced are collected in the bottom vessel (9).

(22) The simple and stable configuration of the integrated system comprising of at least one tubular reactor of said dimensions and stripper arranged in series to remove the ammonia formed during the production of alkyl carbamate from urea and alcohol provides adequate residence time for the reaction to go to completion by reducing the equilibrium limitations and driving the reaction in forward reaction to achieve >90% selectivity towards alkyl carbamate.

(23) The alkyl carbamate produced by the process of the present invention can be used in the synthesis of isocyanates, urethane foams, coatings, as pesticides and insecticides.

(24) The dialkyl carbonates obtained as intermediates in the further embodiment of the process find application as electrolytes in Lithium batteries, solvents etc.

(25) The following examples, which include preferred embodiments, will serve to illustrate the practice of this invention, it being understood that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purpose of illustrative discussion of preferred embodiments of the invention.

EXAMPLES

(26) In literature methods have been reported to synthesize alkyl carbamates by various routes. In the present invention, synthesis has been done by non-catalytic route using urea and alcohol. Simple tubular reactor has been used to conduct the said reaction.

(27) (A) Urea+Methanol

(28) Solution of Urea and corresponding alcohol was prepared and pumped through the tubular reactor of tube. In all of the experiments, 1000 g urea was dissolved into 7470 g methanol to obtain homogeneous solution. This proportion was maintained throughout the experiment. Temperature inside the reactor was maintained by heating the reactor wall from outside by electrical heaters. No special rotating equipments are required which makes the operation very simple and inexpensive compared to other routes and corresponding equipments. Since the reaction is reversible, higher molar feed ratio of alcohol to urea was used to drive the reaction forward. The ammonia formed during reaction was removed by stripping, which drove reaction further thereby obtaining near complete conversion of urea. At steady state 90% urea conversion and 97% selectivity could be obtained consistently in first pass.

Example 1

(29) 1000 g urea was dissolved into 7470 g methanol to obtain homogeneous solution. The said mixture was subsequently pumped into a tubular reactor of outer diameter (ASTM A269) using HPLC pump, the pumping rate being 5 ml/min. The typical length of the reactor for this experiment was chosen to be 4 meters. The temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 170 C. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 22.5 bar using the back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. Cumulative samples were collected after experiments and were analyzed using GC and HPLC to quantify raw materials and products. HPLC analysis showed 81.4% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 96.6% MC selectivity.

(30) The ASPEN simulations of a configuration of tubular reactorstrippertubular reactor clearly demonstrate the advantage of the disclosed configurations.

Example 2

(31) Experimental Procedure and Results

(32) The individual weights of ingredients in ureamethanol mixture were kept unchanged from Example 1. Similarly, the dimensions of the reactor, temperature inside reactor and the flow rate of the mixture were kept unchanged. The change from the Example 1 was the pressure of the reactor, which was maintained at 23 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. HPLC analysis showed 78.4% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 95.8% MC selectivity.

Example 3

(33) The mixture of the ingredients, the temperature inside the reactor and the dimensions of the reactor were kept unchanged. However, the reaction feed comprising of urea and methanol mixture was pumped at flow rate of 7.5 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 22.8 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. HPLC analysis showed 69% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 94% MC selectivity.

Example 4

(34) The ingredient mixture and the dimensions of the reactor were kept unchanged. In this example, the temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 180 C. The flow rate of urea and methanol mixture was kept 7.5 ml/min through the reactor, as in the Example 3. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 28.5 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. HPLC analysis showed 76% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 92.5% MC selectivity.

Example 5

(35) In this example, the typical length of the reactor was chosen to be 9 meters. The temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 180 C. The flow rate of urea and methanol mixture was adjusted at 12.3 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 28 bar. HPLC analysis showed 64% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 88% MC selectivity.

Example 6

(36) The typical length of the reactor and the temperature of the reactor were kept unchanged from Example 5. The mixture of urea and methanol was pumped at flow rate of 6.2 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 28 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. HPLC analysis showed 79% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 90% MC selectivity.

Example 7

(37) In this example, the only variable was the flow rate which was kept at 24.6 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 28 bar. HPLC analysis showed 53% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 88% MC selectivity.

Example 8

(38) The temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 170 C. The flow rate of the mixture was chosen to 18 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 23 bar. HPLC analysis showed 88.3% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 92.9% MC selectivity.

Example 9

(39) The typical length of the reactor was unchanged 9 meter. The temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 170 C. The reaction flow rate was selected to be 18 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 23 bar. HPLC analysis showed 93% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 99.4% MC selectivity.

Example 10

(40) In Example 10, all of the variables were same as in Example 8 and 9. HPLC analysis showed 90.8% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 97.2% MC selectivity.

(41) The data of aforesaid experiments is shown below in table 1

(42) TABLE-US-00001 Feed Reactor flow Urea MC Experiment length rate Temperature Pressure conversion selectivity No. [m] [ml/min] [ C.] [bar] [%] [%] 1 4 5 170 22.5 81.4 96.6 2 4 5 170 23 78.4 95.8 3 4 7.5 170 22.8 69 94 4 4 7.5 180 28.5 76 92.5 5 9 12.3 180 28 64 88 6 9 6.2 180 28 79 90 7 9 24.6 180 28 53 88 8 9 18 170 23 88.3 92.9 9 9 18 170 23 93 99.4 10 9 18 170 23 90.8 97.2
(B) Other than Methanol

(43) Instead of methanol, urea was dissolved into ethanol, propanol and butanol in different proportions. The outer diameter of the tubular reactor was whereas the reactor length was chosen to be 4 meters throughout the experiment. The mixture is maintained between 185-190 degree.

Example 11

(44) 250 g urea was dissolved into 7500 g propanol to obtain homogeneous solution. This mixture was subsequently pumped into a tubular reactor of outer diameter (ASTM A269) using HPLC pump at a flow rate of 18 ml/min through the reactor. The typical length of the reactor for this experiment was 4 meter. The temperature inside the reactor was maintained at 185 to 190 C. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 15 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. The process was carried out for 8 hours. Cumulative samples were collected after experiments and were analyzed with the help of GC and HPLC to quantify raw materials and products. HPLC analysis showed 96.7% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 95.7% propyl carbamate selectivity.

Example 12

(45) 500 g urea was dissolved into 7666 g ethanol to obtain homogeneous solution. This mixture was pumped into a tubular reactor at flow rate of 18 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 25 bar using back pressure regulator mounted downstream of the tubular reactor. The reaction was carried out for 8 hours. HPLC analysis showed 95.2% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 74.3% ethyl carbamate selectivity.

Example 13

(46) 134 g urea was dissolved into 6621 g butanol to obtain homogeneous solution. This mixture was then at flow rate of 18 ml/min through the reactor. The pressure of the reactor was maintained at 8 bar. The reaction was carried out for 7 hours. HPLC analysis showed 92.8% urea conversion and GC analysis showed 77.4% BC selectivity.

(47) The data of the aforesaid examples are tabulated in Table 2:

(48) TABLE-US-00002 Reactor Feed Urea Exp. length flow rate Temperature Time Pressure conversion Alkyl Carbamate No. [m] [ml/min] [ C.] (h) [bar] [%] selectivity [%] 1 4 18 185 to 190 8 15 96.7 Propyl carbamate = 95.7 2 4 18 185 to 190 8 25 95.2 Ethyl carbamate = 74.3 3 4 18 185 to 190 7 8 92.8 Butyl carbamate = 77.4