ALUMINUM SUBSTRATES WITH METAL-MATRIX COMPOSITE AT FEATURE AREAS
20190351486 ยท 2019-11-21
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B29C2049/4874
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C33/38
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C49/487105
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C49/4823
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C2049/4892
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B29C2949/0715
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B22F5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A substrate has a body defined at least in part by a single piece of aluminum or aluminum alloy material having a cavity and a pinch-off or other feature area and further having a metal-matrix composite (MMC) layer formed integrally in the body at the pinch-off or other feature area. A process of producing a substrate involves machining a single piece of material to provide a body having a surface and a feature area, the feature area being of smaller dimension than required for the piece, integrally forming a metal-matrix composite layer in the feature area to build up the feature area to at least a dimension required for the piece. The metal-matrix composite comprises an aluminum-nickel alloy matrix (e.g. Al-12Si alloy alloyed with Ni) having WC particles embedded therein or a aluminum matrix (e.g. Al-12Si alloy) having TiC particles embedded therein and has greater wear resistance, greater strength, greater toughness or any combination thereof than the material.
Claims
1. A substrate, composed of Al or an alloy thereof, with a cladding of a wear resistant metal matrix ceramic (MMC) comprising: a Ni bearing Al alloy matrix with particles of WC; or an Al matrix with particles of TiC, where the cladding is metallurgically bonded to the substrate, and the WC or TiC particles are distributed in the matrix in an amount in a range of from 5 to 50%, based on a weight of the composite.
2. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the Al alloy of which the substrate is composed comprises: Al 2024 all, Al 2124 all, Al 2219 T31 through T87, Al 6009 all, Al 6010 all, Al 6061 T4 through T6511, Al 7075 T6 through T7351, Al 7050 all or Al 7475 all.
3. The substrate according to claim 2 wherein the Al alloy of which the substrate is composed comprises Al 7075 T6 through T7351.
4. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the substrate is clad at feature areas thereof and not at a surface of the substrate away from the feature areas, whereby the cladding is not a coating.
5. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the matrix comprises Al-1251 alloy.
6. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the matrix comprises Al 4047.
7. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the WC or TiC particles are distributed in the matrix in an amount in a range of from 10 to 40%, based on the weight of the composite.
8. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the WC or TiC particles are distributed in the matrix in an amount in a range of from 20 to 35%, based on the weight of the composite.
9. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the MMC layer has a microstructure consistent with formation by laser cladding.
10. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein cladding has a wear resistance of at least about 5 times that of the substrate.
11. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the cladding comprises WC particles.
12. The substrate according to claim 11 wherein the cladding has a Vickers hardness (Hv0.5) of about 200.
13. The substrate according to claim 11 wherein the matrix comprises 1.5-5.4% Ni based on weight of the composite.
14. The substrate according to claim 11 wherein the matrix comprises 2.4-3.6% Ni based on weight of the composite.
15. The substrate according to claim 11 wherein the matrix comprises about 3% Ni based on weight of the composite.
16. The substrate according to claim 11 wherein the embedded particles are distributed in the aluminum-nickel alloy matrix in an amount of about 27%, based on the weight of the composite.
17. The substrate according to claim 1 wherein the cladding comprises TiC particles.
18. The substrate according to claim 17 wherein the cladding has the embedded particles distributed in the aluminum-nickel alloy matrix in an amount of about 30%, based on the weight of the composite.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0029] In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, embodiments thereof will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
Example 1: Laser Cladding of Al 7075-T651 Substrate with Al 4047+WC/Ni
[0043] Laser cladding was performed by using a focused Nd:YAG laser beam with a 115-mm focal length lens. A powder feeder was used to simultaneously deliver Al 4047 and WC/Ni powder mixture through a feed nozzle into the melt pool at a rate of about 2 g/min. The laser beam and powder feeding nozzle were kept stationary, while the Al-7075-T561 substrate was moved under the beam by a CNC motion system. The cladding was conducted with an average laser power up to 500 W with a beam diameter of about 1 mm. A laser pulse duration of 10 ms and a frequency of 10 Hz were used for the processing. An overlap ratio of 30% was used between passes to produce multi-passes to cover the required area, while a z movement of about 130 m was used to deposit multi-layers to reach the required height.
Example 2: Laser Cladding of Al 7075-T651 Substrate with Al 4047+TiC
[0044] Laser cladding was performed by using a focused Nd:YAG laser beam with a 115-mm focal length lens. A powder feeder was used to simultaneously deliver Al 4047 and TiC powder mixture through a feed nozzle into the melt pool at a rate of about 2 g/min. The laser beam and powder feeding nozzle were kept stationary, while the Al-7075-T561 substrate was moved under the beam by a CNC motion system. The cladding was conducted with an average laser power up to 500 W with a beam diameter of about 1 mm. A laser pulse duration of 10 ms and a frequency of 10 Hz were used for the processing. An overlap ratio of 30% was used between passes to produce multi passes to cover the required area, while a z movement of about 200 m was used to deposit multi-layers to reach the required height.
Example 3: Microstructure Analysis of Clad Substrates
[0045] In a preliminary experiment, a layer of Al 4047 (which is the matrix material of the metal-matrix composite) was laser clad on to Al 7075-T651 substrate by a modification of the procedure of Example 1 in order to examine the microstructure of the clad specimen. This was compared to a similar specimen in which a layer of Al 7075 was clad on to Al 7075-T651 substrate. Examination by optical microscopy of a cross-section of the specimens showed that cladding with Al 7075 showed a tendency for cracking while cladding with Al 4047 produce a good metallurgical bond without inducing cracks or pores in the clad layer. Further, the laser clad Al 4047 layer showed good machinability, a smooth transition of hardness from the substrate to the clad layer, and a generally uniform hardness through the layer. Finally, a polishing test showed that the laser clad Al 4047 layer is superior to the Al 7075-T651 substrate in polishing.
[0046] With reference to
[0047] With reference to
Example 4: Microhardness Analysis of Clad Substrates
[0048] A Vickers hardness test (ASTM E38410e2) was conducted on the laser clad products of Examples 1 and 2 using a load of 500 g for 15 s at evenly distributed points spaced by 0.2 mm.
[0049] Further, with reference to
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Vickers Hardness Material Vickers Hardness (Hv0.5) A2 steel 222 Be-Cu alloy 384 Stainless Steel Stavex ESR 231 Al 4047 + 30% (90% WC + 10% Ni) 198 Al 4047 + 30% (TiC) 141 Al 7075-T651 177
Example 5: Wear Resistance Analysis of Clad Substrates
[0050] Wear resistance was performed with pin-on-disc testing as per ASTM G99-05 (2010) to evaluate sliding wear resistance of a laser-clad specimen of the present invention (Al 4047+30% (90% WC+10% Ni) on Al 7075-T651; Al 4047+30% (TiC) on Al 7075-T651) in comparison to Al 7075-T651, A2 steel, BeCu and Stainless Steel Stavex ESR. The test was performed with a Falex Pin-on-Disc Tester with a dry slide to determine volume wear loss. All sample surfaces were fine ground and cleaned before testing. The testing was done with a normal load of 3.5 N, at a linear slide speed of 300 mm/s over a total slide distance of 1500 m using a tungsten carbide (WC) ball.
[0051] Wear loss results from the pin-on-disc testing are shown in
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Wear Loss Volume Wear Loss Relative Wear Material (10.sup.3 mm.sup.3/m) Resistance (R) A2 steel 0.085 17.1 Be-Cu alloy 0.157 9.27 Stainless Steel Stavex ESR 0.251 5.80 Al 4047 + 30% (90% WC + 0.276 5.28 10% Ni) Al 4047 + 30% (TiC) 0.292 4.99 Al 7075-T651 1.456 1
[0052] Cladding of an aluminum or aluminum alloy substrate with a Al 4047+30% (90% WC+10% Ni) or Al 4047+30% (TiC) metal-matrix composite provides an excellent balance of properties. The clad metal-matrix composite layer forms a good metallurgical bond with the substrate with no formation of cracks or pores. Excellent hardness and wear resistance for Al 4047+30% (90% WC+10% Ni), approaching that of materials used in the prior art, and excellent wear resistance for Al 4047+30% (TiC) leads to extended life at feature areas, while good thermal compatibility between the substrate and metal-matrix composite layer makes the MMC layer less prone to cracking further extending the life. Good machinability provides for ease of manufacturing.
[0053] In contrast, Al 7075-T651 itself is soft and easily worn, therefore its use at feature areas in substrates results in reduced service life. Use of typical hard, wear resistant materials such as steels and BeCu alloy at feature areas extends working life of aluminum or aluminum alloy substrates, but is still unsatisfactory since thermal incompatibility leads to cracking which prevents a full realization of the benefits of the harder material. Further, such hard, wear resistant materials are difficult to machine, which makes manufacturing more difficult.
REFERENCES
[0054] The contents of the entirety of each of which are incorporated by this reference. [0055] Dickinson A, et al. (1991) Process for forming an extrusion-blow molded ultrathin container using a heat generating pinch off arrangement. U.S. Pat. No. 5,021,209 issued Jun. 4, 1991. [0056] Kobayashi S. (1996) Blow molding die and method of manufacturing same. European Patent Publication 742,094 published Nov. 13, 1996. [0057] Lee N. (2007) Understanding blow molding. Hanser Publications, p. 61-70. [0058] Paget T. (2009) One-piece blow mold halves for molding a container. U.S. Pat. No. 7,531,124 issued May 12, 2009.
[0059] Other advantages that are inherent to the structure are obvious to one skilled in the art. The embodiments are described herein illustratively and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention as claimed. Variations of the foregoing embodiments will be evident to a person of ordinary skill and are intended by the inventor to be encompassed by the following claims.