EGGOIST MULTI-LEVEL SYSTEM OF FLOOR EQUIPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL POULTRY MAINTENANCE
20190350173 ยท 2019-11-21
Inventors
- Sergii Bondarev (Kyiv, UA)
- Gennadii Malovanyi (Kharkiv, UA)
- Tetyana Grygorenko (Kyiv, UA)
- Oleksandr Lystopadov (Kyiv region, UA)
Cpc classification
A01K31/22
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system for commercial poultry maintenance combining the advantages of poultry's free-range run with periodical automated manure removal feature of the cage housing method. The optimum dimensions of the aviary body frame are calculated as per special formulae for the length and width depending on the nest type and arrangement. EGGOIST equipment system allows to improve the microclimate parameters of the aviary, to ensure the consistently high sanitary and hygienic conditions and the lowering of egg-laying hens' morbidity rate, and to dramatically increase production rates per farmland area unit.
Claims
1. EGGOIST multi-level system of floor equipment for commercial maintenance of egg-laying hens, each level of which consists, in particular, of the main poultry housing area, nesting area with an egg collector, service areas of drink and feeding systems, manure removal system, as well as a number of auxiliary mechanisms, wherein the floor of each of the levels is designed as a wire mesh, and the manure removal system includes a transporter whose belt is positioned below the level of the mesh floor.
2. EGGOIST multilevel floor equipment system of claim 1, further comprising poultry's natural need zones with solid floor covering taking 15 to 30% of the total floor area of each level.
3. EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system of claim 1, wherein the construction of the aviary and equipment installation are conducted simultaneously, whereby separate parts of the equipment serve as bearing members of the building structure.
4. EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system of claim 1, wherein the optimum dimensions of the aviary body frame are calculated as per special formulae for the length and width depending on the nest type and arrangement.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0029] The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein:
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0040] All the levels in the aviary fitted with EGGOIST equipment system are the same, apart from the bottom level, where extra production equipment is installed. The level where the life cycle of laying hens takes place represents an aviary with guards and a mesh floor. The arrangement of a separate level is illustrated in
[0041] The frontal service zone for the personnel 14 (separately indicated on
[0042] As
[0043]
[0044]
[0045] The main area of poultry housing 17, the natural needs area 16, as well as the nesting area 13 combined constitute the zone of poultry housing in the aviary fitted with EGGOIST floor equipment system. Under the European standards, a usable area of the aviary is only the area where the birds are actually housed, i.e. cages or aviaries, including the feeding and drinking systems, as well as perches for night rest. The nesting areas are not considered to be usable space. The areas of auxiliary equipment location, service walkways and service zones which, in effect, merely provide extra utilities, are not considered to be usable areas either. At the same time, a general tendency towards increasing the part of the usable area in aviaries is observed. Considering this, EGGOIST multi-tier floor equipment system may be embodied in a number of ways. For example, the longitudinal service zones (lateral galleries) may be minimized across the width or obviated altogether at the discretion of the customer. It is technically possible to position the egg collector against the wall of the aviary guard. In this case it is covered by a protective screen, so that the birds could not peck the eggs, and the area used for egg collectors becomes usable, as it becomes possible to place the perches for the birds' night rest beneath them. Single nests with one entrance as shown in
[0046]
[0047] The support sigma-profile and the manure removal belt support beams reinforce the construction of the aviaries fitted with EGGOIST multi-level system of equipment, whereby the mesh floors for the poultry act as floors between the levels. The absence of solid flooring in the construction enables to speed up the erection and cut its cost.
[0048] A better embodiment of the invention consists in the construction of an aviary fitted with EGGOIST multi-level equipment system, with optimum dimensions of the of the aviary body frame calculated as per the formulae specially developed to ensure absolute compliance of the useable area of the construction to the norms of cage-free poultry maintenance.
[0049] The length of the aviary body frame as a whole is determined by the total number of the birds to be kept in it, and the norms of the floor space per bird, while the length of the poultry housing zone must be a multiple of the feeding front. Thus, the length A of the aviary body frame in meters is calculated as
A=TF.sub.k/4k+P+H(1)
for the option of single nests positioned against the walls of the aviary guards, and
A=TF.sub.k/8k+P+H(2)
for double nests positioned in the middle of the nesting area.
[0050] Conventions:
[0051] Tnumber of birds;
[0052] kthe coefficient which takes into account the tiering of the nest (one, two or three tiers);
[0053] F.sub.kregulatory feeder space per bird, m;
[0054] Pthe length of the area of the motor-drive manure removal stations location;
[0055] Hthe length of the area of the manure removal belt tensioner and egg collector location.
[0056] The value of parameters P and H is conditioned by the technological necessity. In this case, P=2.5 m, and H=5 m. When necessary, these dimensions may be altered within certain limits without failing to comply with the standards of equipment operation in terms of area accepted in Ukraine (the minimum distance from the poultry housing area to the motor-drive station is 1.500 m), as well as the ones established by the EU Directive 98/58/EC (0.900 m) and the guidelines of the US poultry farming associations (0.798 m.). Thus, the exact value of parameters P and H is determined by the specific conditions of the equipment layout and the customer's wishes, subject to the standards applicable in the given country.
[0057] The width B of the aviary body frame in meters depends on the position and tiering of the nests and is calculated using the following formula:
B=4(kS.sub.H+S.sub.p)/F.sub.k+B.sub.o+B.sub.i
in the case when single nests are positioned against the wall of the aviary guard, and
B=8(kS.sub.H+S.sub.p)/F.sub.k+B.sub.o+B.sub.i
in the case when the nests are double and positioned along the longitudinal axis of the nesting area and, correspondingly, the aviary body frame.
[0058] Conventions:
[0059] S.sub.nregulatory space per bird, m.sup.2;
[0060] S.sub.pregulatory nest area per bird, m.sup.2;
[0061] b.sub.othe width of the longitudinal service zone, m; for double nests, values B.sub.o on the left and on the right are summarized;
[0062] b.sub.ithe extra width of the nest, m; depends on the position and the width of the egg collector belt.
[0063] The optimum usable depth of the nest in meters is calculated as L=4S.sub.p/F.sub.k for single nests with one entrance positioned against the wall of the aviary guards, and L=8S.sub.p/F.sub.k for double nests positioned along the longitudinal axis of the nesting area and having two entrances.
[0064] The use of EGGOIST multi-level system of equipment substantially decreases the labor efforts on servicing the aviary. For example, at the manufacturing and experimental plot of TEXHA Production Association (Novohrad-Volynsky, Zhytomyr region) in a standard floor aviary with the area of 1,600 m2 (at the rate of 5 birds per 1 m2) serviced by one farm laborer, up to 8,000 laying hens are usually kept. A three-level aviary fitted with EGGOIST equipment having the same usable area of one level (floor) is also serviced by one regular worker and by a part-time technician; while the aviary contains 24,000 birds, i.e. three times as much. A worker attends to all three levels in eight hours per day, a technicianin two hours per day; thus in a full-time working day a technician can enable the operation of 3 to 4 aviaries, i.e. service over 70,000 hens.
[0065] EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system for commercial poultry maintenance fully complies with the norms set by EU Council Directives 98/58/EC and 1999/74/EC, as well as the guidelines and requirements for cage-free poultry maintenance set by professional US poultry breeder associations: HFAC (Human Farm Animal Care) and UEP (United Egg Producers), as well as AHA (American Humane Association) implementing the foodstuff certification program AHC (American Humane CertifiedHumane Heartland Farm Animal Program).
[0066] A practical test of the functionality and advantages of EGGOIST multi-level system of floor equipment was conducted in 2016-2017 at the premises of the manufacturing and experimental plot of TEXHA Production Association (Novohrad-Volynsky, Zhytomyr region). A comparative study of two systems of poultry housing equipment: BALTIKA equipment for caging poultry with poultry run for 21,500 hens and EGGOIST multi-level system of floor equipment for 7,500 hens, was undertaken. Both kinds of equipment are manufactured by TEXHA Production Association. Laying hens of LohmannBraun (brown) and LohmanSLClassik (white) hybrids were chosen as study material. During the study, the following was considered: hens' egg production (egg-laying curve) and body weight dynamics, safety of adult birds, commercial properties of the eggs (egg weight, cracks, and shell quality). The results of the study are presented in the tables.
[0067] The data of Table 1 gives an overview of the birds' performing characteristics when different floor housing systems were used in comparison with the established standard for the strain, and assess the efficiency of the existing housing methods. It has been established that the birds housed with the use of EGGOIST equipment system equal the standard parameters for LohmannBraun (LB) strain in their performing characteristics and even exceed the functional indicators of the birds housed with the use of BALTIKA equipment.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparative analysis of laying hens' performance Index LB standard BALTIKA EGGOIST Age at 50% laying of eggs, weeks 21 20.5 21.5 Egg-laying peak, weeks 30 29 31 Peak height, % 92-94 93.2 96.3 Egg production per bird, eggs 305-315 301 312 Average egg weight, g 63.5-64.5 63.6 64 Liveability in 78 weeks of life, % 94-96 95.2 96.2
[0068] It is worth mentioning that the dynamics of egg production of the hens housed with various equipment systems differed in a number of ways. The analysis of separate segments of the curve of egg production shows birds' response to the housing conditions at a certain age. The adaptation of the young stock to the housing conditions also took place with certain peculiarities. The analysis of the body weight dynamics during the adaptation period may lead to the conclusion that the young stock in the EGGOIST system settled faster and better than the others.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Body weight dynamics of laying hens in different periods of egg production Average body weight of the birds in different ages, g/% Housing conditions 19 weeks Egg-laying peak 52 weeks Standard LB 1583/100 1923/100 1975/100 EGGOIST 1810/114 1920/99.8 2030/103 BALTIKA 1780/112 1920/99.8 1940/98
[0069] Table 2 data demonstrate that the birds kept in the active movement conditions with the use of EGGOIST system of equipment meets the strain standard at the end of the maintaining period, and does not differ significantly from the standard by the body weight values. Thus, the average body weight of 19-week old rearing stock was higher than the one of the young stock of the same age housed with the use of BALTIKA equipment. This attests to the fact that the young stock introduced into the grown-up flock at 17 weeks under the EGGOIST housing conditions, adapts quicker and better than under aviary housing.
[0070] The birds' liveability is considerably high and meets the standard (94-99%). The analysis of the liveability data in different housing conditions showed that the hens' safety rates were the highest when EGGOIST equipment system was used, which is illustrative of the birds' viability maintained by a increased metabolism due to high motor activity.
[0071] The efficiency of the use of birds is determined not only by their egg production, but also by the quality of the produce. The study of the eggs laid by 30-week old hens (at the egg-laying peak) under different housing conditions showed that the hens kept in the EGGOIST system laid larger eggs: on average 1.9 g heavier than the hens kept with the use of BALTIKA equipment and 1.2 g heavier than the strain standard establishes. This tendency persists in the hens' later life, at 52 weeks. The comparative analysis of biophysical properties of the eggs, which determine their market value, demonstrated that the hens kept with the use of EGGOIST equipment system laid eggs with a higher content of dry matter in the egg white, and a thick hard shell.
[0072] The distribution analysis of the eggs with dirty or damaged shell produced by hens under different housing conditions showed that when the birds were kept with the use of EGGOIST equipment system, 9% of eggs with dirty and 1% of eggs with damaged shell were produced. For the hens housed with the use of BALTIKA equipment these figures were 24% and 2% respectively.
[0073] The studies have established that the rate of egg production of the hens in an aviary fitted with EGGOIST equipment system was higher throughout the whole production cycle, had a higher peak and stable performance. In comparison with aviary poultry housing utilizing BALTIKA equipment system, EGGOIST ensures a longer productive periodfrom 17 to 100 weeks, a larger number of eggs per laying hen, improved feed conversion rate and a better poultry liveability, with approximately a three-fold reduction of floor eggs.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Technical results of the hens in different housing systems Index EGGOIST BALTIKA Production cycle, days 385 375 Number of eggs per 1 laying hen, eggs 316 302 Feed conversion rate, feed per kilogram of 2.25 . . . 2.32 2.39 eggs Feed consumption, gram per bird per day 120 . . . 124 127 Mortality, % 8 11 Number of floor eggs, % 3 . . . 5 10 . . . 15
[0074]
[0075] The studies have proved the efficiency of EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system for the production of quality produce. In comparison with the conventional floor housing of the birds, this system is characterized by its ease of maintenance and ease of access to the birds and equipment by the personnel. Egg collection, logistics and supplying water and feed to the aviary is simplified. The microclimate conditions and lighting regimes are adjusted by the remote control positioned at the bottom level. The ventilating equipment ensures the optimum distribution of air flows and maintenance of the preset air temperature and humidity on each level independently. Due to the high mechanization and automation level of the processes, a minimal number of personnel is required to service the aviary; also, manual labor costs are virtually eliminated. Housing the birds with the use of EGGOIST equipment system is maximally approximated to their natural living environment and allows to satisfy the physiological needs of laying hens. The bird morbidity and injury rate decreases substantially. When the floor housing of poultry is actually used, EGGOIST multi-level floor equipment system dramatically increases the production rates per farmland area unit. With corresponding variation of the production cycle parameters it can be used for growing the young stock to the required conditions. EGGOIST equipment system is intended mostly for specialized farms.
[0076] The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.