Composite design bunk rail systems
10479259 ยท 2019-11-19
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60P3/1075
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A composite design bunk rail system comprises low coefficient of friction adjustable slides with a shock absorbing base, simplifying and precluding damages from loading and handling vehicles, a supporting structure, and adjustable support frames.
Claims
1. A composite design bunk rail system comprising a supporting structure, vehicle slides, and adjustable support frames, wherein the vehicle slides are attached to the adjustable support frames, wherein the vehicle slides are a composite design with a low coefficient of friction sliding surface adhered to a shock absorbing base, wherein the shock absorbing base is a rubber with a 40 to 70 Shore durameter hardness rating, which serves as a vibration isolator, wherein each of the adjustable support frames comprises an aperture and radial slots and is bolted to the given frame support permitting rotation of the adjustable support frame with the vehicle slide to conform to a supported vehicle.
2. The composite design bunk rail system of claim 1 wherein the vehicle slides comprise integral U shaped supports.
3. The composite design bunk rail system of claim 1 wherein the supporting structure is a boat trailer.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(4) Referring to
(5) The vehicle contacts 3B, 4B, and 5B, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, comprise an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene plastic (UHMWPE) with a low coefficient of friction,
(6) The contacts 3B, 4B, and 5B have a low coefficient of friction, i.e. are relatively slick, especially when wet and facilitate sliding a vehicle into place in a loading or unloading process, serving as a wear surfaces, which are bonded to the supports 3A, 4A, and 5A which serve as a shock absorbing base, such as, but not restricted to rubber with a 40 to 70 Shore Durometer hardness rating, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
(7) Referring to
(8) Bolt assemblies 13 through the aperture 9A, radial slots 9B and 9C permit attachment of the adjustable support frame 9 to the frame support 2, as well as rotation of the adjustable support frame 9 to conform to a supported vehicle such, but not restricted to, a boat (not shown) which may have any of a variety of shapes. The adjustable support frames 10, 11, and 12 are similarly attached and function as the adjustable support frame 9, conforming to a variety of vehicle shapes, or even directly bonding the boat slides 3, 4, and 5 to a metal piece for through bolting the slides 3, 4, and 5
(9) Referring to
(10) The fastener assembly 14 comprises a mounting channel nut 14A, a bolt 14B, a flat washer 14C, and a lock washer 14D. As obvious to those skilled in the art of fasteners, there are many ways to serve the same function as the fastener assembly 14, such as T bolts or through bolt assemblies, or even directly bonding the slides 3, 4, and 5 to a metal base (not shown) with a through bolt through the slides 3, 4, and 5, and the metal base, attaching the slides, 3, 4, and 5 to the supporting structure 1.
(11) The boat slides 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are similarly attached.
(12) Advantages and objectives of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, a composite design bunk rail system 100:
(13) has slides flexibility in case of bumping into an oddly molded hull shape or other rigid shape during a loading or unloading process to provide protection for the most valuable part of a boat, the hull.
(14) allows for additional load cushion, support, and vibration dampening that adds to the suspension characteristics of a trailer design.
(15) becomes a structural member of a support system because of the composite design.
(16) can be a permanent long lasting part of the supporting structure.
(17) retrofits and easily mounts to many of the brackets currently used for the existing lumber/carpet components currently used.
(18) is impervious to weather, salt and other ambient environments.
(19) replaces metal springs or other mechanical suspension devices in certain cases on a trailer.
(20) allows a more complete engineering and design with this invention due to more precise and predictable physical characteristics such as cushion and other loading parameters as needed versus the inconsistencies and variations of lumber.
(21) better protects large vehicles through the vibration dampening of rubber, suspending an entire unit above a mechanical hauling vehicle.
(22) better protects payload from extreme impact encountered on roads during transport such as potholes, speed bumps, and rail crossings plus some protection against driver area.
(23) the shock absorbing bases conform to a boat hull, providing a better fit.
(24) minimizes backing a boat trailer and towing vehicle into water for floating a boat onto or off a trailer.
(25) eases winching of a load off a trailer or even allows driving a boat onto the system 100.
(26) creates a safer bunk rail system with no nails, staples or mechanical fasteners exposed, nothing embedded in a carpet to trap material or to come loose and permit damage to a transported vehicle.
(27) eases pushing any load into or on or off the system 100.
(28) has no lumber to rot or break while standing upon it, trying to push or pull a transported vehicle on or off a transporting vehicle, thus providing some safety for an operator.
(29) Although the description above contains many specificites, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but as merely providing illustrations of some of the preferred embodiments of the present invention.
(30) For example, while a bolt assembly is given as example of affixing slides 3, 4, 5 to supports 2, the slides could also be bonded to the supports by a cold or hot bond or some other adhesive process.
(31) It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the present invention.
(32) Thus the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims in the formal application and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.