Systems and Methods for Identifying and Expressing Gene Clusters

Abstract

Methods for identifying biosynthetic gene clusters that include genes for producing compounds that interact with specific target proteins are disclosed. Some methods relate to bioinformatics methods for identifying and/or prioritizing biosynthetic gene clusters. Related systems, components, and tools for the identification and expression of such gene clusters are also disclosed.

Claims

1. A system for identifying one or more candidate biosynthetic gene cluster for introduction into a host organism to produce one or more compounds that modulate a specific non-fungal target protein, the system comprising: a processor; and a memory containing a gene cluster identification application; wherein the gene cluster identification application directs the processor to: load data describing at least one target protein into the memory; load data describing a plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters into the memory; score each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters based on: the presence of one or more homologs of a target protein within or adjacent to the biosynthetic gene cluster, as determined by a homology search; and the confidence in homology of the target protein to genes in the biosynthetic gene cluster.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a fraction of a gene encoding a homolog of the target protein that meets a certain threshold of identity, wherein the certain threshold of identify is at least 25%.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a total number of genes homologous to the target protein present in an entire genome of the organism.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a phylogenetic relationship of the target protein to the one or more homologs of the target protein in or adjacent the biosynthetic gene cluster.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on an expected number of the one or more homologs of the target protein in or adjacent to the biosynthetic cluster.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a likelihood that the target protein is essential for viability, growth, or other cellular processes in a native environment.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on synteny of the biosynthetic gene cluster with related species.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on whether a gene of the biosynthetic gene cluster that encodes a protein is within a protein class that is known to be targeted by secondary metabolites.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a presence of one or more specific promoters adjacent to the one or more homologs of the target protein.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a presence of specific regulatory elements in the biosynthetic gene cluster.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is further based on a presence of the one or more homologs of the target protein outside the biosynthetic gene cluster that are co-regulated with some or all of the genes in the biosynthetic cluster.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the score for each of the plurality of biosynthetic gene clusters is based on a presence of protein- and DNA-sequence-derived features within the biosynthetic gene cluster that are known to produce secondary metabolites.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the target protein is not from a species from which any of the gene clusters originate.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] The written disclosure herein describes illustrative embodiments that are non-limiting and non-exhaustive. Reference is made to certain of such illustrative embodiments that are depicted in the figures, in which:

[0022] FIG. 1A illustrates strategies that may be used to obtain a secondary metabolite from a fungal strain given different properties of the fungal strain.

[0023] FIG. 1B provides a flowchart illustrating a process for identifying and ranking biosynthetic gene clusters.

[0024] FIG. 1C illustrates examples of characterized gene clusters which produce known chemicals and a novel gene cluster with a product.

[0025] FIG. 1D provides a flowchart illustrating a process for identifying biosynthetic gene clusters.

[0026] FIG. 1E provides a flowchart illustrating a process for ranking biosynthetic gene clusters.

[0027] FIG. 1F provides an illustration of computer systems for implementing processes for identifying and ranking biosynthetic gene clusters.

[0028] FIG. 2 illustrates a phylogenetic analysis of enzymes that produce secondary metabolites.

[0029] FIG. 3 illustrates self-resistance mechanisms for potentially toxic secondary metabolites.

[0030] FIG. 4 illustrates a gene cluster that produces lovastatin.

[0031] FIG. 5A illustrates an exemplary process to extract and utilize compound products in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

[0032] FIG. 5B illustrates an exemplary process to produce and extract heterologous, biosynthetic compound products in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

[0033] FIG. 5C illustrates an example production pipeline for producing secondary metabolites from gene clusters.

[0034] FIG. 5D illustrates an example work flow for producing secondary metabolites from gene clusters.

[0035] FIG. 6A illustrates a yeast phase chart displaying yeast cell concentration in relation to time to provide reference for various embodiments of the disclosure.

[0036] FIG. 6B illustrates a yeast phase chart displaying glucose or dextrose concentration in relation to time to provide reference for various embodiments of the disclosure.

[0037] FIG. 6C illustrates a yeast phase chart displaying ethanol or glycerol concentration in relation to time to provide reference for various embodiments of the disclosure.

[0038] FIG. 7A illustrates a DNA vector having a production-phase promoter in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0039] FIG. 7B illustrates a DNA vector having multiple production-phase promoters in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0040] FIG. 8A illustrates a DNA expression vector having a production-phase promoter within an expression cassette in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0041] FIG. 8B illustrates a DNA expression vector having multiple production-phase promoters, each within an expression cassette in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0042] FIG. 9 illustrates a method to construct and utilize production-phase promoter DNA vectors in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure.

[0043] FIG. 10A illustrates an overview of an approach involving yeast homologous recombination assembly.

[0044] FIG. 10B illustrates the homologous recombination in yeast of the parts from FIG. 10A.

[0045] FIG. 10C illustrates the plasmid which results from the parts of FIG. 10A, homologously recombined as in FIG. 10B.

[0046] FIG. 10D illustrates improved sequencing results obtained via disclosed methods.

[0047] FIG. 10E illustrates assembly of plasmid DNA from up to 14 individual fragments.

[0048] FIG. 11A illustrates improved assembly efficiency in a background lacking the DNL4 ligase.

[0049] FIG. 11B illustrates equivalent sequencing efficiencies using DNA prepared from both colonies (red) and liquid cultures (blue) for four test assemblies.

[0050] FIG. 11C illustrates sequencing efficiencies observed using both standard and modified NexteraXT library preparation methods.

[0051] FIG. 11D illustrates a workflow for sequencing plasmids from yeast via a step of transforming the plasmids into E. coli.

[0052] FIG. 11E illustrates a workflow for sequencing plasmids from yeast in accordance with methods described herein.

[0053] FIG. 12 illustrates repaired SNPs in yeast strain DHY674 relative to BY4741.

[0054] FIG. 13 illustrates DHY213, BJ5464, and X303 (a W303 derivative) grown on glucose (fermentation) and ethanol/glycerol (respiration) media.

[0055] FIG. 14A illustrates relative growth rates of strains described here in YPD culture. The dotted line denotes the diauxic shift (the point at which the culture exhausts all glucose and transitions from fermentation to respiration). The DHY derived strain JHY692 shows significantly improved growth in the respiration phase of the culture.

[0056] FIG. 14B illustrates expression of eGFP driven by the PADH2 promoter in the strains from FIG. 14A.

[0057] FIG. 14C illustrates expression of eGFP driven by the PPCK1 promoter in the strains from FIG. 14A.

[0058] FIG. 15A illustrates an example gene cluster.

[0059] FIG. 15B illustrates a polyketide produced by a 5-gene gene cluster.

[0060] FIG. 16 is a heat map graphic generated in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure with data of expression of enhanced-green fluorescent protein driven by various S. cerevisiae promoters.

[0061] FIG. 17 is a data graph of enhanced-green fluorescent protein expression driven by various S. cerevisiae promoters.

[0062] FIG. 18 illustrates fluorescence intensity of 10.sup.5 cells expressing enhanced-green fluorescent protein driven by various promoters.

[0063] FIG. 19 illustrates a phylogenetic tree of Saccharomyces sensu stricto subgenus.

[0064] FIG. 20 illustrates a multiple sequence alignment of various Saccharomyces sensu stricto species' upstream activating sequences in ADH2 promoters. SEQ ID Nos. 36-40.

[0065] FIG. 21 illustrates homology between various Saccharomyces sensu stricto species' ADH2 promoters.

[0066] FIG. 22 is a heat map graphic generated in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure with data of expression of enhanced-green fluorescent protein driven by various S. sensu stricto ADH2 promoters.

[0067] FIG. 23 is a data graph of enhanced-green fluorescent protein expression driven by various S. sensu stricto ADH2 promoters.

[0068] FIG. 24 illustrates four multi-gene expression vector constructs and a data graph of the resultant compound production, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

[0069] FIG. 25 illustrates a biosynthetic process that produces the compound emindole SB via a fungal four-gene cluster.

[0070] FIG. 26 is a data graph of the production results of two product compounds generated.

[0071] FIG. 27A illustrates two plasmid vector constructs in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0072] FIG. 27B illustrates a further vector construct in a yeast cell in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure.

[0073] FIG. 28A illustrates a phylogenetic analysis of further gene clusters. Abbreviations used may include Adenylation domain (A), a,b-hydrolase (a,b-h), ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC), Acyl carrier protein (ACP), Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), Aldo-keto reductase (AK-red), Aminooxidase (AmOx), Aminotransferase (AmT), Arylsulfotransferase (ArST), Acyltransferase domain (AT), C-mehtyltransferase (cMT), Terpene cyclase (Cyc), Dehydratase (DH), Domain of unknown function 4246 (DUF4246), Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) binding protein (FAD), Iron dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (Fe-ADH), Flavin-dependent monooxygenase (FMO), Geranyl-geranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPPS), Glycosidase (glycos.), Glucose-methanol-choline oxidoreductase (GMC), Halogenase (Halo), Highly reducing polyketide synthase (HR-PKS), Hypothetical protein (Hyp), Indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase (IAS), Ketosynthase domain (KS), metallo-B-lactamase (mBla), Mitochodrial phosphate carrier protein (MCP), Major facilitator superfamily transporter (MFS), Metallohydrolase (MH), Methyl transferase (MT), Nicotine adenine dinucleotide dependent dehydrogenase (NAD-DH), Nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) dependent reductase (NADP-R), N-mehtyltransferase (nMT), Non reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS), O-succinylhomoserine sulfhydrylase (O-suc-SH), O-methyltransferase (oMT), Oxidoreductase (OxR), Cytochrome p450 (p450), Dipeptidyl peptidase (Pep), Prenyl transferase (PrT), Product template domain (PT), Riboflavin biosynthesis protein RibD (RibD), RNA helicase (RNAh), starter unit:ACP transacylase domain (SAT), Short-chain dehydrogenase (SDH), Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR), Serine hydrolase (SH), Sugar transport protein (ST), Thiolation domain (T), Terminal domain (TD), Thioesterase domain (TE), Transcription factor (TF), and UbiA-type terpene cyclase (UTC).

[0074] FIG. 28B illustrates various gene clusters and biosynthetic compound products in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0075] FIG. 28C illustrates various gene clusters and biosynthetic compound products in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0076] FIG. 28D illustrates various gene clusters and biosynthetic compound products in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0077] FIG. 28E illustrates various gene clusters and biosynthetic compound products in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0078] FIG. 28F illustrates various gene clusters and biosynthetic compound products in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0079] FIG. 29A illustrates a phylogenetic analysis of gene clusters.

[0080] FIG. 29B illustrates correction of a gene cluster. SEQ ID Nos. 484-489.

[0081] FIG. 30A illustrates schematics of PKS enzyme containing BGCs examined herein.

[0082] FIG. 30B illustrates schematics of UTC containing BGCs examined herein.

[0083] FIG. 31 illustrates a volcano plot of all spectral features identified in the automated analysis of strains expressing PKS containing BGCs. All features determined to be specific to the BGC expressing strain were identified by comparison to a negative vector control.

[0084] FIG. 32 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS1.

[0085] FIG. 33 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS2.

[0086] FIG. 34 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS4.

[0087] FIG. 35 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS6.

[0088] FIG. 36 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS8.

[0089] FIG. 37 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS10.

[0090] FIG. 38 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS13.

[0091] FIG. 39 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS14.

[0092] FIG. 40 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS15.

[0093] FIG. 41 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS16.

[0094] FIG. 42 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS17.

[0095] FIG. 43 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS18.

[0096] FIG. 44 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS20.

[0097] FIG. 45 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS22.

[0098] FIG. 46 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS23.

[0099] FIG. 47 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS24.

[0100] FIG. 48 illustrates features produced by BGC PKS28.

[0101] FIG. 49 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 6.

[0102] FIG. 50 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 7.

[0103] FIG. 51 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 8.

[0104] FIG. 52 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 9.

[0105] FIG. 53 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 10.

[0106] FIG. 54 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 11.

[0107] FIG. 55 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 12.

[0108] FIG. 56 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 13.

[0109] FIG. 57 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 14.

[0110] FIG. 58 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 15.

[0111] FIG. 59 illustrates NMR data and structure of Compound 16.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0112] Systems and methods in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure identify, refactor, and express biosynthetic gene clusters in host organisms to produce secondary metabolites. Systems and methods in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure utilize host organisms to produce secondary metabolites. Using host organisms allows for production of secondary metabolites from biosynthetic gene clusters regardless of whether the native host cell can be cultured, or whether the cluster is expressed in the native host, see FIG. 1A. In some cases, the secondary metabolites may bind to one or more specific proteins. In some embodiments, the host organism ordinarily does not produce the secondary metabolite. The host organism obtains the ability to produce the secondary metabolite due to the introduction of a biosynthetic gene cluster identified using a cluster identification process performed in accordance with an embodiment of the disclosure. In one embodiment, a cluster identification process identifies a biosynthetic gene cluster that possesses characteristics suggesting that it is responsible for producing a secondary metabolite with novel chemistry. In another embodiment, a cluster identification process (discussed further below) identifies a biosynthetic gene cluster that possesses characteristics suggesting that it is responsible for producing a secondary metabolite that binds to a specific protein of interest. In some embodiments this disclosure provides the inclusion of a biosynthetic gene cluster identified using a cluster identification process, in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure, within a host organism enabling the host organism to express a secondary metabolite. In some cases, the secondary metabolite produced in the host cell may be identical to a secondary metabolite that is naturally produced by the organism in which the biosynthetic gene cluster was originally identified. In some cases, the secondary metabolite produced by the host cell is an analog of a secondary metabolite produced by the organism from which the cluster was identified. In other cases, the secondary metabolite produced in the host cell may be structurally distinct from the secondary metabolite produced by the cluster in the originating species. Differences in the product produced may arise from differences in expression and localization of the coding sequences from the cluster. Additionally coding sequences, or expression products thereof, from the cluster may interact with other coding sequences, or expression products thereof, not contained in the cluster. Host cell produced secondary metabolites which are distinct from those produced in the originating species of the cluster may be termed non-naturally occurring secondary metabolites or non-natural secondary metabolites. The secondary metabolite produced by the host organism can be isolated and then can be used, for example, in a treatment. In some cases, the secondary metabolites may be used in a treatment of a disease or disorder which involves aberrant activity of a specific protein. This disclosure also describes a panel of sesquiterpenoid and polyketide products.

Cluster Identification

[0113] Cluster identification processes, in accordance with many embodiments of the disclosure, utilize specific properties of a biosynthetic gene cluster to identify gene clusters of interest from sequence data. Sequence data used with the methods of this disclosure may comprise genomic sequence data, transcriptome sequence data, or other sequence data. In some cases, sequence data may be generated by sequencing a DNA sample obtained from an environmental sample. In other cases, sequence data may be obtained from publically available genome sequence libraries, or may be purchased. Genome sequences may be derived from any organism. In some cases, genome sequences may be derived from a fungal, bacterial, archaeal or plant species.

[0114] In some cases, the genome sequences may be derived from fungi. In some cases, the genome sequences may be derived from fungi which are poorly characterized or difficult to culture. In some cases, the genome sequences may be derived from fungi which are well characterized, or partially characterized. Examples of types of fungi from which sequences may be derived include fungi from one of the following Phyla: Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, Neocallirnastigomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Glomeromycota, Chytridiornycota and Microsporidia. Examples of fungal species which may be the source of sequence data include, but are not limited to: Aspergillus tubingensis, Hypomyces subiculosus, Coniothyrium sporulosum, Acremonium Sp. KY4917, Aspergillus niger, Thielavia terrestris, Trichoderma vixens, Pseudogymnoascus pannorum, Scedosporium apiospermum, Metarhizium anisopliae, Cochliobolus heterostrophus, Verruconis gallopava, Moniliophthora roreri, Punctularia strigosozonata, Hydnomerulius pinastri, Arthroderma gypseum, Setosphaeria turcica, Pyrenophora teres, Cladophialophora yegresit, Talaromyces cellulolyticus, Endocarpon pusillum, Hypholoma sublateritium, Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, Botryotonia cinerea, Formitiporia mediterranea, Heterobasidion annosum, Ge/atoporia subvermispora, Dichomitus squalens, Pleurotus ostreatus, Schizophyllum commune, Stereum hirsutum, Sternum hirsutum, and Dacryopinax primogenitus.

[0115] Provided in FIG. 1B is a flow chart showing a process embodiment that can be implemented using computer systems for identifying and ranking BSGs that are likely to produce secondary metabolites capable for anthropogenic use (e.g., medicinal). As shown, Process 1000 can begin by obtaining genetic sequence data from a biological source or sequence database (1001). In some cases, the sequence data may be derived from single cell sequencing of a fungal cell of unknown species. For example an environmental sample may contain many different cells which may be separated and sequenced. In some cases, the sequence data is obtained from a publically available genetic data library, or may be purchased. Often the genetic sequence data is a genomic sequence of an organism, however, any genetic data sequence, including partial genome sequence data, may be used.

[0116] Process 1000 also identifies biosynthetic gene clusters (1003). Clusters may be identified using bioinformatics methods to scan genome sequences. Characteristics of a gene cluster may include a grouping of two or more genes within about 5 kb, 10 kb, 15 kb, 20 kb, 25 kb, 30 kb, 35 kb, 40 kb or 45 kb of each other. Genes may be bioinformatically identified by the presence of known promoter sequences, transcription initiation sequences, or homology to known genes or gene features. The term homology as used herein refers to sequences with high sequence identity, for example a sequence identity of at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more than 99%. Sequence identity may be determined using alignment tools such as Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), available via the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), to determine areas of conserved sequence. Biosynthetic gene clusters may be identified using a bioinformatics tool, such as ClustScan, SMURF, CLUSEAN, and/or anti SMASH. Biosynthetic gene clusters typically contain one or more core biosynthetic genes and one or more tailoring genes. Clusters which contain the same, or highly similar, core enzymes with different tailoring genes may produce quite different compounds, as seen in FIG. 1C. Expressing a subset of genes from a cluster may also result in production of a different compound compared with the compound produced by expression of all the genes in the cluster.

[0117] Process 1000 also scores and/or ranks gene clusters utilizing various factors (1005). In some cases, scores and rankings are based on the type of secondary metabolite to be produced. In other cases, scores and rankings are based on a protein or domain existing within the cluster. In even more cases, the level of homology of a particular protein within the cluster to a protein of interest is considered. It should be understood that many different factors can be used, as determined by the application and use of the biosynthetic gene cluster data.

[0118] An embodiment of a process for identifying biosynthetic gene clusters using computer systems is provided in FIG. 1D. Process 2000 can begin with obtaining genetic sequence data of an organism having gene clusters (2001). In many cases, the genetic sequence data is a genomic sequence of an organism. In other cases, the genetic data sequence is a partial genome sequence data. In addition to genetic sequence data, Process 2000 also obtains target sequence data keying to biosynthetic gene clusters of interest (2003). The target sequence is any sequence the user wishes to define and identify clusters. In some cases, the target sequence is a particular protein domain of interest. In other cases, the target sequence is a particular protein, protein homolog or protein class.

[0119] In some embodiments, clusters are scanned for the presence of genes encoding proteins known to be involved in biosynthetic pathways. Key proteins involved in biosynthetic pathways include terpene synthases, polyketide synthases (PKSs, both highly-reducing and non-reducing), non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, UbiA-type terpene cyclases (UTCs), polyketide synthase non-ribosomal peptide synthetase hybrids, and dimethyl allyl transferases (see FIG. 2).

[0120] Process 2000 also identifies the target sequence within genetic sequence data using homologous alignment scores (2005). Using an appropriate application, the sequence of the target is used to align to the genetic sequence data, looking for a threshold of homology. In some cases, a positive homologous event occurs when the target sequences aligns with the a portion of the genetic sequence having homology of at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more than 99%. Sequence homology may be determined using any alignment tool, such as, for example BLAST.

[0121] Using the homologous alignment scores, candidate biosynthetic gene clusters may be identified in the region surrounding the homologous event (2007). In many cases, the proximal upstream and downstream genes are examined to determine and define a gene cluster. In some of these cases, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more proximal genes in either direction are examined. In addition or alternatively, a gene cluster may be defined by genetic distance of the homologous event. Gene clusters may also be defined using a bioinformatics tool, such as ClustScan, SMURF, CLUSEAN, and/or antiSMASH. Once identified and defined, clusters may be stored as data and/or reported via an output interface (2009).

[0122] An embodiment for ranking biosynthetic gene clusters using computer systems is provided in FIG. 1E. As shown, Process 3000 can begin with obtaining genet sequence data of multiple biosynthetic gene clusters. In this process, the clusters obtained each have a homolog protein of interest. The homolog of interest depends on the user's desired result. In many cases, the homolog of interest has a human ortholog that is known to be involved in a human condition, disorder, or disease. In some of these cases, the human ortholog is known to have mutations, either congenital or somatic, that lead to a condition, disorder, or disease. In some other of these cases, the human ortholog is involved in biological pathways that are involved in a condition, disorder, or disease. In other cases, the homolog of interest has an ortholog in an infectious species, including, but not limited to bacterial, fungal, protozoan species. In many of these cases, the ortholog in the infectious species is essential to the vitality of the organisms of the species. In some other of these cases, the ortholog in the infectious species is involved in producing a toxin. Furthermore, in many cases, the user has a desired result to prioritize clusters that will produce a secondary metabolite that may target the of human or infectious species ortholog.

[0123] Identifying a gene cluster that may produce a secondary metabolite that binds a target protein may involve multiple different steps. In some cases, such a gene cluster may be identified by the presence of one or more genes encoding a homolog of the target protein, within or adjacent to the cluster, as determined by a homology search (for example, using the tblastn algorithm, with a maximum score granted when one homolog is found). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the confidence in homology of the target to a gene or genes in a cluster. For example, according to the tblastn algorithm, gene clusters containing a gene with an e value less than about 10.sup.−10, 10.sup.−20, 10.sup.−30, 10.sup.−35 or 10.sup.−40 may be selected. Gene clusters may also be selected using a protein blast method such as blastp to compare a predicted protein sequence against either known protein sequence or other predicted protein sequence. For blast searches using a known or predicted protein sequence gene clusters containing a gene with an e value less than about 10.sup.−10, 10.sup.−20, 10.sup.−30, 10.sup.−35 or 10.sup.−40 may be selected. Selected gene clusters may be prioritized with increasing priority scores for lower e-values. In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the fraction of the homologous gene that meets a certain threshold of identity (for example, with an increasing score for more identity, and a lower bound threshold of at least about 99%, 95%, 80%, 85%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20% or 15% coverage). In some cases, a gene cluster may be selected if it contains a gene which produces a protein with at least about 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 98%, 99% or 100% homology to the target protein. In some cases, a protein that is encoded by the region that is included in, or positioned proximal to, a BGC may be identical to, or have at least about 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% or about 100% homology to a target protein. In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the total number of genes homologous to the target protein present in the entire genome of the organism (for example, with a maximum score granted to cases with 2-4 homologs per genome). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the homology of the gene in, or adjacent to, the cluster to the target protein (for example, using the blastx algorithm, with a maximum score granted when the gene in the biosynthetic gene cluster's closest homolog in the target protein's genome is the target protein itself). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the phylogenetic relationship of the target protein to the gene in the cluster (for example, with an increasing score for homologs in the gene cluster that clade with the target protein, with confidence assigned by a bootstrap test or Bayesian inference of phylogeny, and a lower bound threshold defined as homologs in a phylogenetic context that appear in a clade with bootstrap value of 0.7 or Bayesian posterior probability of 0.8). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the expected number of homologs of the target in or adjacent to the biosynthetic cluster (for example, with a greater score the lower the probability of a homolog of the target being present in or adjacent to a biosynthetic cluster of a certain size, given the number of total homologs in the genome, as determined by a permutation test). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by the likelihood that the target protein is essential for viability, growth, or other cellular processes in the native environment (for example, through evidence that deletion of homologs in related organisms (such as S. cerevisiae) render the organism inviable). In some cases, a gene cluster may be identified by one or more of the above methods, or by any two or more of the above methods.

[0124] Utilizing identification steps. Process 3000 also scores each biosynthetic gene cluster based on factors indicative of secondary metabolite synthesis related to the hornolog of interest (3003). Accordingly, a score is constructed for each biosynthetic cluster based on one or more of the following: [0125] (a) the presence of one or more homologs of target orthologs within or adjacent to the cluster, as determined by a homology search (e.g., the BLAST algorithm); [0126] (b) the degree of homology of one or more target orthologs to genes in a cluster (e.g., as defined by the e-value); [0127] (c) the fraction of the homologous gene that meets a certain threshold (e.g., the number of homologous protein domains); [0128] (d) the total number of genes homologous to the target ortholog present in the entire genome of the organism; [0129] (e) the degree of homology of a gene in or adjacent to the cluster to the target ortholog [0130] (f) the number of homologs in the gene family (e.g., the number of homologs of a human target gene in the human genome); and/or [0131] (g) the expected number of homologs of the target ortholog in, or neighboring, a biosynthetic cluster (e.g., the probability of a homolog of the target being present in or adjacent to a biosynthetic cluster of a certain size, given the number of total homologs in the genome, and as determined from a permutation test) [0132] (h) the synteny of the gene cluster with related species (e.g., conservation of gene cluster) [0133] (i) the function class of the target ortholog [0134] (j) the presence of specific promoters adjacent to the homolog(s) within the gene cluster (e.g., identification of bidirection promoter upstream the homolog and biosynthetic gene) [0135] (k) the presence of specific regulatory elements in the biosynthetic cluster (e.g., the number of transcription factor binding sites shared among target orthologs and homologs/biosynthetic genes in the cluster) [0136] (l) the presence of homologs outside the cluster that are co-regulated with some or all the genes within the biosynthetic cluster [0137] (m) the presence of protein- and DNA-sequence derived features within the clusters that have successfully been shown to produce secondary metabolites. It should be understood that a particular user may desire to use one, some, or all the factors listed here, and/or other factors not listed. The factors utilized depend on the user's application and desired result.

[0138] Process 3000 also has the option to calibrate the score to by referencing a set of “true positives” (i.e., cases where there is one or more known targets in or adjacent to a biosynthetic cluster that produces a small molecule targeting the target, such as the lovastatin BGC) (3005). The output of this process may be a ranked and/or scored list of biosynthetic clusters, which may be used to identify the clusters that will produce therapeutic small molecules targeting the products of a disease-related gene (3007). The ranked and/or scored list of clusters can be stored as data or reported via an output interface (3009).

[0139] Turning now to FIG. 1F, computer systems (4001) may be implemented on a single or multiple computing devices in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. Computer systems (4001) may be personal computers, laptop computers, and/or any other computing devices with sufficient processing power for the processes described herein. The computer systems (401) include a processor (403), which may refer to one or more devices within the computing devices that can be configured to perform computations via machine readable instructions stored within a memory (4007) of the computer systems (4001). The processor may include one or more microprocessors (CPUs), one or more graphics processing units (GPUs), and/or one or more digital signal processors (DSPs). According to other embodiments of the invention, the computer system may be implemented on multiple computers.

[0140] In a number of embodiments of the invention, the memory (4007) may contain a gene cluster identification and/scoring application (4009) that performs all or a portion of various methods according to different embodiments of the invention described throughout the present application. As an example, processor (4003) may perform a gene cluster identification and/or scoring method similar to any of the processes described above with reference to FIGS. 1D and 1E, during which memory (4007) may be used to store various intermediate processing data such as the genetic sequence alignment data (e.g., BLASTn) (4009a), identification of key target sequences with gene clusters (4009b), identification of homolog(s) to a protein of interest (4009c), characterization of homologs (4009d), scores and/or ranks of gene clusters (4009e), and calibration of gene cluster scores (4009f).

[0141] In some embodiments of the invention, computer systems (4001) may include an input/output interface (4005) that can be utilized to communicate with a variety of devices, including but not limited to other computing systems, a projector, and/or other display devices. As can be readily appreciated, a variety of software architectures can be utilized to implement a computer system as appropriate to the requirements of specific applications in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.

[0142] Although computer systems and processes for chimeric sequence unveiling and performing actions based thereon are described above with respect to FIG. 1F, any of a variety of devices and processes for data associated with cluster identification and/or scoring as appropriate to the requirements of a specific application can be utilized in accordance with many embodiments of the invention.

[0143] In some embodiments, gene sequences within a novel cluster, or a set of novel clusters, may be compared to gene sequences from known and characterized biosynthetic gene clusters. In some cases, phylogenetic comparisons may be carried out between gene sequences in a novel cluster and gene sequences from characterized gene clusters. As shown in FIG. 2, of the many biosynthetic enzymes which have been identified from sequence data, only a small fraction have been characterized, suggesting potential for many novel chemistries. Phylogenetic analysis may be performed on the core biosynthetic gene or genes, or on one or more tailoring genes of the novel cluster. Preferred clusters may be clusters containing one or more gene sequences which do not share a close phylogenetic relationship with a sequence from a characterized gene cluster. In some cases, gene clusters may be ordered according to their phylogenetic relationship to characterized gene clusters, clusters with the most distant relationships may be preferred for further analysis.

[0144] in several embodiments, a specific secondary metabolite is used as a weapon against another organism (i.e., is toxic to or inhibits the growth of specific type of organism). In many instances, the toxic secondary metabolite may also be toxic to the organism that produces the secondary metabolite. Accordingly, the producing organism may defend against self-harm in a number of ways including (but not limited to) pumping the secondary metabolite out of the cell, enzymatically negating the secondary metabolite, or producing an additional version of the protein targeted by the secondary metabolite that is less sensitive or insensitive to the secondary metabolite, (see FIG. 3). In instances in which an organism produces an additional version of the target protein. the “protective” version of the gene that encodes the additional version of the target protein that is less sensitive to the secondary metabolite is often colocalized with the biosynthetic gene cluster, for example the HMGR. gene in the lovastatin cluster shown in FIG. 4. Although different to the gene that produces the target protein, the protective version of the gene should produce a protein that maintains detectable homology to the target protein. In several embodiments, the cluster identification process takes advantage of this homology to identify those biosynthetic gene clusters that contain or are adjacent to a gene that encodes a. protective homolog of the target protein. In a number of embodiments of the disclosure, the genetic sequences of multiple organisms are analyzed to detect biosynthetic gene clusters possessing this characteristic.

[0145] A target protein may be any protein of interest which has a homolog in the genome sequence/s from which the gene clusters were obtained. In some cases, the target protein is an enzyme. In some cases, the target protein is a signaling protein. In some cases, the target protein is one which is required by the species of origin. For example, the target protein may be one which contributes to viability of growth of the cell, and deletion or inactivation of the target protein from the cell may have deleterious effects on the viability or growth of the cell. In some cases, the target protein may have a vertebrate or mammalian homolog. In some cases, the target protein has a human homolog. The human homolog may be a protein which is dysregulated in a disease. An example of a gene cluster which was identified using methods disclosed herein, and which comprises a homolog of the BRSK1 gene is shown in FIG. 15A.

[0146] In some embodiments, a biosynthetic cluster of interest which produces a secondary metabolite that interacts with a target protein may also produce a protein for inactivating the secondary metabolite or for secreting the secondary metabolite from the cell in which it is produced. A protein which inactivates the secondary metabolite may be omitted when designing an expression construct to express this cluster in a host cell. A protein involved in secreting the secondary may be included or omitted when designing an expression construct to express this cluster in a host cell. To identify such clusters several approaches may be used. For example a set of biosynthetic gene clusters may be identified from genome data and the identified clusters may be analyzed for the presence of enzymes with activities that may be useful for degradation of a secondary metabolite. In another example, a set of biosynthetic gene clusters may be analyzed for the presence of proteins involved in transport or secretion pathways. In another example a homology search may be identified across one or more genome sequences to find genes encoding proteins homologous to an enzyme known to degrade a toxic compound. Once such genes have been identified they may be analyzed for proximity to a biosynthetic gene cluster. Proximity to a gene cluster may be defined as within about 50 kb, 40 kb, 30 kb, 20 kb, 10 kb, 5 kb, 1 kb, or less than 1 kb.

[0147] In some embodiments, a gene cluster which produces a secondary metabolite that may be toxic to the host cell may also contain signals to direct the production of the secondary metabolite to a specific cellular location. In some cases, the enzymes may be membrane tethered to the intracellular or extracellular side of a cell membrane, or may be secreted through a membrane to the intracellular or extracellular side (including the insides of organelles and vacuoles). For example, the enzymes of the cluster may contain membrane-targeting signals to target the enzymes to either the extracellular membrane or to an intracellular organelle or vacuole. In some cases, the enzymes may be targeted to the extracellular membrane in an orientation which results in the active region of the enzyme being inside of an organelle or vacuole. In some cases, the enzymes may be targeted to the extracellular membrane in an orientation which results in the active region of the enzyme being outside of the cell. Such clusters may be identified by analyzing the predicted proteins of the cluster for the presence of peptide targeting signals or of terminal sequences with homology to targeting signals.

[0148] In some cases, a genome or genomes may be searched for gene clusters and the set of identified gene clusters may be searched for genes which are homologous to a target gene, or which produce proteins homologous to a target protein. In other cases, a genome or genomes may be searched for a gene or genes homologous to a target gene, and the identified genes may be analyzed for association with a gene cluster. In other cases, a genome or genomes may be searched for gene clusters and the set of identified gene clusters may be phylogenetically analyzed to determine relationships between the identified gene clusters and known, characterized, gene clusters. In yet other cases, a novel genome or genomes may be searched for sequences distantly homologous to a known biosynthetic enzyme, and the identified genes may be analyzed for association with a gene cluster.

[0149] Specific secondary metabolites synthesized using methods in accordance with a number of embodiments of the disclosure and the proteins utilized to identify the biosynthetic gene clusters used to synthesize the secondary metabolites and targeted by the secondary metabolites are described herein. An example of a method which may be used to produce a secondary metabolite is shown in FIG. 5. As shown in an exemplified embodiment process in FIG. 5A, Process 100 generates and extracts a heterologous compound for use. Exemplary Process 100 can begin by searching genetic data of various organismal species for pathways or BGCs that produce a compound product (101). The organismal species used in this step can be any species. For example, fungal and bacterial species often contain multiple BGC pathways that are encoded in its DNA. Likewise, the genetic data to be searched can be any genetic data available or determinable by the user. Accordingly, on one end of the spectrum, the genetic data may be a fully annotated, publicly available genome of a well-studied species (e.g., Penicillium notatum). On the other end of the spectrum, the genetic data may be a publicly unavailable, partial genomic sequence of a newly discovered species incapable of anthropogenic cultivation, wherein the partial sequence is found to have a gene cluster that may produce a compound.

[0150] Exemplary embodiment Process 100 may continue by using the genetic data to reconstruct the compound product pathway in an acceptable genetic expression system (103). Often, to reconstruct the compound pathway, the genetic data is used to create nucleic acid molecules (e.g., DNA) comprising the coding sequences of the pathway genes sufficient to produce the product in the acceptable genetic expression system. The nucleic sequences are to be transferred into the expression system. Expression systems are any organism capable of producing the heterologous compound by heterologous expression of the pathway genes. Typical expression systems include (but are not limited to) E. coli and S. cerevisiae.

[0151] Once the compound product pathway is reconstructed and transferred within an expression system, the expression system produces the compound (105) in exemplary Process 100. Typically, production of the compound results from coordinated expression of the pathway genes in the expression system. The coordinated expression of the pathway genes results in the production of the enzymes primarily responsible for constructing the heterologous compound product.

[0152] FIG. 5B depicts another exemplary embodiment process. Exemplary Process 200 produces, extracts, and characterizes a biosynthetic compound derived from heterologous expression of a gene cluster. The process may begin with the identification and selection of a gene cluster with an identifiable trait that is indicative of compound production (201). Several indicative processes to select gene clusters exist, including several computer-implemented programs. One such program is antiSMASH2.0, which is platform for mining BGC clusters for production of secondary metabolites that searches for core structures to identify putative BGCs (K. Blin, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W204-12, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). Another such method is described herein which utilizes homolog sequences within a proximal region in the genome to identify putative BGCs. It should be noted that many other methodologies could be used to select BGCs.

[0153] Once a gene cluster has been selected, Process 200 continues by appropriating nucleic acid molecules with the coding sequences of the various genes within the cluster (203 in FIG. 5B). Typically, the nucleic molecules are DNA, but other nucleic molecules (e.g., RNA) can be used for certain applications. When extracting gene sequence data from the host organism, it is usual to remove the non-translated portions (e.g., UTRs, introns) from the gene, leaving only the coding sequence, but the non-translated portions may also be used, especially if they provide a beneficial characteristic. Appropriation of the nucleic molecules can be performed by many different methods including (but not limited to) direct extraction from the host, chemical synthesis, and/or cDNA generation methods (e.g., reverse transcription of host RNA). Regardless of the method used, the resulting nucleic acid molecules may be available to build into expression vectors for heterologous expression.

[0154] Exemplary Process 200 utilizes the appropriated nucleic acid molecules to assemble expression vectors for expression in an appropriate organismal expression system (e.g., E. coli, S. cerevisiae). Expression vectors are nucleic acid molecules that have the necessary components to express a heterologous gene in the expression system. Common expression vectors are plasmid DNA and viral vectors, but also include kits of DNA molecules that can be joined together to form a longer DNA molecule by a recombination methodology (e.g., yeast homologous recombination (YHR)).

[0155] To express a heterologous gene from an expression vector, an expression cassette is may be used, which comprises the sequences of an appropriate promoter and an appropriate terminator along with the heterologous gene sequence. The promoter is typically located upstream of the heterologous gene and can regulate the gene's expression. Many different types of promoters can be used. The selection of the appropriate promoter depends on the application and expression profile desired. For example, in the S. cerevisiae expression system, production-phase promoters may express heterologous genes only in the production-phase of the yeast culture's life cycle, which may have desirable properties. For more description of production-phase promoters, please refer to the related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/469,452 (“Inducible Production-Phase Promoters For Coordinated Heterologous Expression in Yeast”), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. However, it should be understood, that constitutive promoters and other response-driven promoters could be used within the system.

[0156] The sequences of promoters to be used in an expression vector can be derived from various sources. E. coli expression systems often use the T7 promoter derived from the T7 bacteriophage because the promoter reliably produces high expression in E. coli. Endogenous promoter sequences (e.g., the lac operon in E. coli) are expected to perform well within the organismal expression system.

[0157] Expression vectors often have other sequences that benefit duplication, selection and stability of the vector within the organismal expression system, in addition to the expression cassette. In several instances, some of these sequences are necessary for maintenance in the expression system. For example, plasmid vectors within an E. coli or S. cerevisiae host require a host origin of replication and a selectable marker. The origin of replication signals the host expression system to replicate the plasmid vector in order to produce more copies of the plasmid as the host cells duplicate and divide. The selectable marker ensures that only the host cells that contain the vector continue to survive and propagate. Accordingly, these sequences may be necessary for viable heterologous expression.

[0158] Once the expression vector is assembled, the heterologous BGC genes are expressed using the organismal expression system (207). Accordingly, the expression vector is to exist within the organismal host such that the host will express the heterologous BGC genes to produce the encoded enzymes. The enzymes produce a biosynthetic compound. This compound is be extracted from the expression system (209).

[0159] Extracted heterologous biosynthetic compounds can be characterized to determine their various structures and conformations. Some resultant products may have a solitary structure and conformation while other products will have several different structures with multiple conformations. The various structures and conformations can be determined using mass spectrometry, chromatography, and/or other methods.

[0160] There are numerous classes of biosynthetic compounds. For example, polyketides and terpenes are a class of compounds derived from various organismal species. Many novel biosynthetic compounds are likely to have beneficial properties, as a multitude of biosynthetic compounds have been found to be useful in several industries.

[0161] Illustrated in FIG. 5C is an exemplary pipeline to produce heterologous, biosynthetic compounds. Exemplary Pipeline 300 takes advantage of a yeast expression system to reproduce a fungal BGC in order to produce a heterologous compound product.

[0162] Pipeline 300 begins with selection of a biosynthetic gene cluster (301). Depicted, as an example, is a phylogenetic tree of numerous fungal BGCs. Using the phylogenetic data, a BGC having a desired trait is selected. The coding sequences of the various BGC genes are then used to chemically synthesize DNA molecules (303). The synthetized BGC DNA molecules are then to be assembled into a heterologous expression construct (305). In this example, the DNA molecules are assembled by yeast homologous recombination. Accordingly, the synthesized DNA molecules have overlapping homologous sequences that the yeast will use to recombine the various DNA molecules into a plasmid DNA vector.

[0163] Pipeline 300 then utilizes the assembled expression vectors to maintain and express the BGC in the yeast (307). The expression of the various heterologous genes results in expression of a number of heterologous enzymes that then can produce the heterologous biosynthetic compounds. Once a sufficient titer of compound is produced, it can be characterized to determine its structures and properties (309).

[0164] Briefly, the method comprises gene cluster selection as discussed herein, synthesis of coding sequence, promoters and terminators, assembly of the cluster coding sequence, expression in a fungal host, and isolation and characterization of compounds produced. An example of a gene cluster identified using the methods herein, and the compound created by expression of the identified genes in yeast, i s shown in FIG. 15B

Cluster Engineering

[0165] Once a gene cluster is identified according to the methods described herein, the cluster may be prepared for expression in a heterologous host cell. Editing of a putative gene cluster may involve steps such as: removal of introns, replacement of promoters, replacement of terminators, gene shuffling, and codon optimization. For example, if a gene cluster is to be expressed in S. cerevisiae then coding sequences from the gene cluster may be codon optimized for S. cerevisiae, and operably linked to S. cerevisiae promoters and terminators.

[0166] The gene cluster editing may rely on automatic annotation of expressed sequences, introns, and exons, or on manual inspection of the cluster. The gene cluster editing may be done in silico using the sequence data, or may be done in vitro or in vivo using the DNA sequence in a suitable vector such as a cloning vector. In some cases an initial edited gene cluster may not produce a product and reanalysis of the predicted coding sequences, and introns of the same, may reveal errors in the predicted transcription start sites, transcription termination sites and/or splice sites.

[0167] In an embodiment, this disclosure provides sequences (SEQ ID NOs: 67-483) of cryptic BGCs which encode various products. These BGCs may also be reengineered to provide the coding sequences without the endogenous regulatory sequences. The coding sequences from these clusters may be isolated and cloned into one or more expression vectors for expression in a model host system. The expression vectors may be plasmids, viruses, linear DNA, bacterial artificial chromosomes or yeast artificial chromosomes. The expression vectors may be designed to integrate into the host genome, or to not integrate. In some cases, the expression vector may be a high copy number plasmid.

Promoters

[0168] Expression of a refactored gene cluster in a host organism may require coordinated expression of several different coding sequences. In some cases, the expression of multiple different coding sequences in a host organism may require the use of multiple different promoters suitable for that organism. This disclosure provides methods for discovering multiple promoters with similar activities and expression patterns but with differing DNA sequence. Such methods may involve use of closely related species, such as different species of Saccharomyces. Saccharomyces (S.) is a genus of fungi composed of different yeast species. The genus can be divided into two further subgenera: S. sensu stricto and S. sensu lato. The former have relatively similar characteristics, including the ability to interbreed, exhibiting uniform karyotype of sixteen chromosomes, and their use in the fermentation industry. The later are more diverse and heterogeneous. Of particular importance is the S. cerevisiae species within the S. sensu stricto subgenus, which is a popular model organism used for genetic research.

[0169] The yeast S. cerevisiae is a powerful host for the heterologous expression of biosynthetic systems, including production of biofuels, commodity chemicals, and small molecule drugs. The yeast's genetic tractability, ease of culture at both small and large scale, and a suite of well-characterized genetic tools make it a desirable system for heterologous expression. Occasionally, production systems require coordinated expression of two or more heterologous genes. Coordinated expression systems in bacteria (e.g., E. coli) has long exploited the operon structure of bacterial gene clusters (e.g., lac operon), allowing a single promoter to control the expression of multiple genes.

[0170] The construction of synthetic operons therefore allows a single inducible promoter to control the timing and strength of expression of an entire synthetic system. In yeast, many heterologous-expression systems do not rely on the operon system, but instead rely on a one-promoter, one-gene paradigm. Accordingly, multi-gene heterologous expression is generally performed using multiple expression cassettes with a well-characterized promoter and terminator, each on a single expression vector (e.g., plasmid DNA) (See D. Mumberg, R. Muller, and M. Funk Gene 156:119-22, 1995). With traditional restriction-ligation cloning, it is also possible to recycle a promoter on a single plasmid by the serial cloning of multiple genes (M. C. Tang, et al., J Am Chem Soc 137:13724-27, 1995).

[0171] Turning now to the drawings and data, disclosed embodiments are generally directed to systems and constructs of heterologous expression during the production phase of yeast. In many of these embodiments, the expression system involves coordinated expression of multiple heterologous genes. More embodiments are directed to production-phase promoter systems having promoters that are inducible upon an event in the yeast's growth or by the nutrients and supplements provided to the yeast. Specifically, a number of embodiments are directed to the promoters that are capable of being repressed in the presence of glucose and/or dextrose. In more embodiments, the promoters are capable of being induced in the presence of glycerol and/or ethanol. In additional embodiments, at least one production-phase promoter exists within an exogenous DNA vector, such as (but not limited to), for example, a shuttle vector, cloning vector, and/or expression vector. Embodiments are also directed to the use of expression vectors for the expression of heterologous genes in a yeast expression system.

[0172] Controlled gene expression is desirable in heterologous expression systems. For example, it would be desirable to express heterologous genes for production during a longer stable phase. Accordingly, decoupling the anaerobic growth and aerobic production phases of a culture allows the yeast to grow to high density prior to introducing the metabolic stress of expressing unnaturally high amounts of heterologous protein. In accordance with many embodiments, the anaerobic growth phase is defined by the yeast culture's energy metabolism in which the yeast cells predominantly catabolize fermentable carbon sources (e.g., glucose and/or dextrose), and a high growth rate (i.e., short doubling-time). In contrast, and in accordance with several embodiments, the aerobic production phase is defined by the yeast culture's energy metabolism in which the yeast cells predominantly catabolize nonfermentable carbon sources (e.g., ethanol and/or glycerol), and a steady growth rate (i.e., long doubling-time). Accordingly, each yeast cell's energy metabolism can be predominantly in aerobic or nonaerobic phase, and dependent on the local concentration of the carbon source.

[0173] FIG. 6A depicts the phases of a yeast culture when provided a fermentable sugar, such as glucose or dextrose sugar, at a concentration of around 2-4% as its main carbon source. Initially, a yeast culture will predominantly catabolize the fermentable sugar, which correlates with an exponential growth with very high doubling rates. The growth phase typically lasts approximately 4-10 hours. During this phase, the catabolism of the fermentable sources results in the production of ethanol and glycerol.

[0174] Once glucose becomes scarce, the growth of a yeast culture passes a diauxic shift and begins to predominantly catabolize nonfermentable carbon sources (e.g., ethanol and/or glycerol) (FIG. 6B). The predominant catabolism of nonfermentable carbon source correlates with a longer and more stable production phase that can last for several days, or even weeks in an industrial-like setting (FIG. 6A). During the production phase, yeast cultures reach and maintain a high concentration, but have a much lower doubling time (FIG. 6A). Due to the decrease in doubling rate, yeast cultures no longer expend a great amount of energy and resources on rapid growth and thus can reallocate that energy and those resources to other biological activities, including heterologous expression. Accordingly, it is hypothesized that limiting the transcription of heterologous genes to the production phase would allow a yeast culture to reach a high, healthy confluency that would in turn allow better heterologous protein expression and biosynthetic production.

[0175] In yeast, transcriptional regulation can be achieved in several ways, including inducement by chemical substrates (e.g., copper or methionine), the tetON/OFF system, and promoters engineered to bind unnatural hybrid transcription factors. Perhaps the most commonly employed inducible promoters are the promoters controlled by the endogenous GAL4 transcription factor. GAL4 promoters are strongly repressed in glucose, and upon switching to galactose as a carbon source, strong induction of transcription is observed (M. Johnston and R. W. Davis, Mol. Cell Biol. 4:1440-48, 1984). While this system leads to high-level transcription, only four galactose-responsive promoters are known, and galactose is both a more expensive and a less efficient carbon source as compared to glucose (S. Ostergaard, et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68:252-59, 2000). Other carbon-source dependent promoters have also been used for heterologous gene expression. The S. cerevisiae ADH2 gene exhibits significant derepression upon depletion of glucose as well as strong induction by either glycerol or ethanol (K. M. Lee & N. A. DeSilva Yeast. 22:431-40, 2005). Once induced, genes driven by the ADH2 promoter (pADH2) display expression levels equivalent to those driven by highly expressed constitutive counterparts. This induction profile was found to work in heterologous expression studies, as the system auto-induces upon glucose depletion in the late stages of fermentative growth after cells have undergone diauxic shift. The ADH2 promoter has been used extensively for yeast heterologous expression studies, resulting in high-level expression of several heterologous biosynthetic proteins (For example, see C. D. Reeves, et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:5121-29, 2008).

[0176] As shown in FIG. 6C, the concentration of ethanol and glycerol increases as glucose and dextrose sugar decreases, due to anaerobic glycolysis (i.e., breaking down the fermentable sugar) and subsequent fermentation (i.e., converting the broken-down glucose into alcohol) and glycerol biosynthesis (i.e., converting the broken-down glucose into glycerol). Upon fermentable sugar depletion, yeast cultures undergo a diauxic shift and begin to use ethanol and glycerol as a carbon source instead of glucose. A diauxic shift, as understood in the art, is defined as a point in time when an organism switches from primarily consumption of one source for energy, to primarily another source. This shift typically elicits significant changes to a yeast culture's gene-expression pattern. Accordingly, it is hypothesized that higher concentrations of ethanol, (e.g., ˜2-4%) and or glycerol (e.g., ˜2%) could be used to stimulate promoters that either directly or indirectly respond to these concentrations (See FIGS. 6A and 6C).

[0177] Various disclosed embodiments are based on the discovery of inducible promoters that can be used for the coordinated expression of multiple genes (e.g., gene cluster pathway) in Saccharomyces yeast. Described below are sets of inducible promoters from S. cerevisiae and related species that are inactive during anaerobic growth, activating transcription only after a diauxic shift when glucose is near-depleted and the yeast cells are respiring (i.e., the production phase). As portrayed in various embodiments, various production-phase promoters are auto-inducing and allow automatic decoupling of the growth and production phases of a culture and thus initiate heterologous expression without the need for exogenous inducers. It should be noted, however, that many embodiments include production-phase promoters that are also inducible in the presence of nonfermentable carbon-sources (e.g., ethanol and/or glycerol) supplied to the yeast. As such, multiple embodiments employ recombinant production-phase promoters that act much like constitutive promoters when the host yeast cultures are constantly maintained in ethanol and/or glycerol-containing media.

[0178] Once activated, the strength of various production-phase promoters can vary as much as 50-fold. The strongest production-phase promoters stimulate heterologous expression greater than that observed from strong constitutive promoters. The production-phase promoters could be employed in many different applications in which high expression of multiple genes is beneficial. Accordingly, the promoters can be used, for example, in multiple subunit protein production or for the production of biosynthetic compounds that are produced by multiple proteins within a pathway. Discussed in an exemplary embodiment below, some embodiments are used to express multiple proteins involved in production of indole diterpene compound product. When compared to constitutive promoters, the production-phase promoters produced greater than a 2-fold increase in titer of the exemplary diterpene compounds. In other exemplary embodiments, it was found that the production-phase promoter system outperformed constitutive promoters by over 80-fold. Thus, these promoters can enable heterologous expression of biosynthetic systems in yeast.

[0179] The practice of several embodiments will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional methods of chemistry, biochemistry, and molecular biology and recombinant DNA techniques within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., A. L. Lehninger, Biochemistry (Worth Publishers, Inc., 30 current addition); Sambrook, et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (3rd Edition, 2001); Methods In Enzymology (S. Colowick and N. Kaplan eds., Academic Press, Inc.).

Inducible Production-Phase Promoters for Heterologous Expression in Yeast

[0180] In accordance with several embodiments, inducible production-phase promoters can be constructed into exogenous expression vectors for production of at least one protein in Saccharomyces yeast. In many embodiments, the constructed expression vectors have multiple inducible production-phase promoters in order to express multiple heterologous genes. Several embodiments are directed to production-phase promoters and DNA vectors incorporating these promoters. Promoters, in general, are defined as a noncoding portion of DNA sequence situated proximately upstream of a gene to regulate and promote its expression. Typically, in S. cerevisiae and similar species, the promoter of a gene can be found within 500-bp upstream of a gene's translation start codon. In some cases, a promoter may be about 500 bp, 600 bp, 700 bp, 800 bp, 900 bp, 1 kb, 1.5 kb, 2 kb or more than 2 kb upstream of a gene's transcription start site.

[0181] In accordance with several embodiments, production-phase promoters have two defining characteristics. First, production-phase promoters are capable of repressing heterologous expression of a gene in S. cerevisiae and similar species when the yeast is exhibiting anaerobic energy metabolism. As described previously, yeast exhibit anaerobic metabolism in the presence of a nontrivial concentration of fermentable carbon sources such as, for example, glucose or dextrose. In addition, production-phase promoters are also capable of inducing heterologous expression of a gene in S. cerevisiae and similar species when the yeast is exhibiting aerobic energy metabolism. As described previously, yeast exhibit aerobic metabolism when fermentable carbon sources are near depleted and the yeast cells switch to a catabolism of nonfermentable carbon sources such as glycerol or ethanol. These characteristics correspond to the phase charts in FIGS. 6A-6C. Tables 1 and 2 provide several examples of production-phase promoters in accordance with several embodiments.

[0182] The production-phase promoters can be characterized based on their level of transgene expression relative to each other and to constitutive promoters. As described in an exemplary embodiment below, it was found that the sequence of endogenous promoters of the S. cerevisiae genes ADH2, PCK1, MLS1, and ICL1 exhibited high-level expression and thus can be characterized as strong production-phase promoters (Table 1). Sequences of the endogenous promoters of the S. cerevisiae genes YLR307C-A, ORF-YGRO67C IDP2, ADY2, CACI, ECM13, and FAT3 exhibited mid-level expression and thus can be characterized as semi-strong production phase promoters (Table 1). In addition, sequences of the endogenous promoters of the S. cerevisiae genes PUT1, NQM1, SFC1, JEN1, SIP18, ATO2, YIG1, and FBP1 exhibited low-level expression and thus can be characterized as weak production-phase promoters (Table 1).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Production-Phase Promoters Expression Phenotype Sequence Gene Name Systematic Name Expression Phenotype ID Number ADH2 YMR303C Strong 1 PCK1 YKR097W Strong 2 MLS1 YNL117W Strong 3 ICL1 YER065C Strong 4 YLR307C-A YLR307C-A Semi-Strong 5 YGR067C YGR067C Semi-Strong 6 IDP2 YLR174W Semi-Strong 7 ADY2 YCR010C Semi-Strong 8 GAC1 YOR178C Semi-Strong 9 ECM13 YBL043W Semi-Strong 10 FAT3 YKL187C Semi-Strong 11 PUT1 YLR142W Weak 12 NQM1 YGRO43C Weak 13 SFC1 YJR095W Weak 14 JEN1 YKL217W Weak 15 SIP18 YMR175W Weak 16 ATO2 YNR002C Weak 17 YIG1 YPL201C Weak 18 FBP1 YLR377C Weak 19

[0183] The closely related S. sensu stricto species have similar genetics and growth characteristics. Accordingly, the phase charts provided in FIGS. 6A-6C apply generally to S. sensu stricto species. Table 2 provides a list of strong production-phase exogenous promoters of similarly related species in accordance with numerous embodiments of the disclosure.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Strong Production-Phase Promoters of S. sensu stricto species Species Gene Name Sequence ID Number S. paradoxus ADH2 36 S. kudriavzevii ADH2 37 S. bayanus ADH2 38 S. paradoxus PCK1 41 S. kudriavzevii PCK1 42 S. bayanus PCK1 43 S. paradoxus MLS1 44 S. kudriavzevii MLS1 45 S. bayanus MLS1 46 S. paradoxus ICL1 47 S. kudriavzevii ICL1 48 S. bayanus ICL1 49

[0184] It should be noted that substantially similar sequences to the production-promoter sequences are expected to regulate heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae and achieve similar results. Accordingly, a substantially similar sequence of a production-phase promoter, in accordance with numerous embodiments, is any sequence with a high functional equivalence such that when regulating heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae that it achieves substantially similar results. For example, in an exemplary embodiment below, it was found that the ADH2 promoter of S. bayanus is only 61% homologous, yet achieved strong heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae, similar to the endogenous ADH2 promoter. In some cases, a substantially similar sequence may be homologous to the promoter sequences identified herein (e.g., have a nucleotide BLAST e value of less than or equal to 10.sup.−10, 10.sup.−20, 10.sup.−30, 10.sup.−35 or 10.sup.−40).

[0185] In FIG. 7A, an exemplary schematic of a section of an exogenous DNA vector (e.g., cloning vector, expression vector, and/or shuttle vector) having a production-phase promoter sequence embedded within. A vector is capable of transferring nucleic acid sequences to target cells (e.g., yeast). Typical DNA vectors include, but are not limited to, plasmid or viral constructs. DNA vectors are also meant to include a kit of various linear DNA fragments that are to be recombined to form a plasmid or other functional construct, as is common in yeast homologous recombination methods (See e.g., Z. Shao, H. Zhao & H. Zhao, 2009, Nucleic Acids Research 37:e16, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). Often, embodiments of cloning vectors will incorporate other sequences in addition to the production-phase promoter. As depicted in FIG. 7A, the exemplary cloning vector has a terminator sequence and cloning/recombination sequence in addition to the production-phase promoter, each of which can assist with expression vector construction. Furthermore, other sequences necessary for growth and amplification can be incorporated into the promoter vector. Embodiments of these sequences may include, for example, at least one appropriate origin of replication, at least one selectable marker, and/or at least one auxotrophic marker. It should be noted, however, that various embodiments of the disclosure are not required to contain cloning, terminator, or either sequences. For example, embodiments of a typical shuttle vector may only contain the production-phase promoter sequence along with the necessary sequences for amplification in a biological system.

[0186] For purposes of this application, an exogenous DNA vector is any DNA vector that was constructed, at least in part, exogenously. Accordingly, DNA vectors that are assembled using the yeast's own cell machinery (e.g., yeast homologous recombination) would still be considered exogenous if any of the DNA molecules transduced within yeast for recombination contain exogenous sequence or were produced by a non-host methodology, such as, for example, chemical synthesis, PCR amplification, or bacterial amplification.

[0187] As shown in FIG. 7B, various embodiments of the disclosure are directed to DNA vectors having multiple production-phase promoters. In these various embodiments, multiple different production-phase promoters are incorporated, preferably each having a unique sequence and derived from a different gene and/or S. sensu stricto species. Having unique promoter sequences can prevent complications that can arise during product production in yeast, such as, for example, unwanted DNA recombination at sites similar to the promoter sequences that render the DNA vector constructs undesirable. In many embodiments, the DNA vector has at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or more than 20 production-phase promoters. As the size of the DNA vector increases, the utility may decrease, as larger vectors may become unwieldly for the intended organism to handle. For example, plasmids for amplification in E. coli are often somewhere between 2,000 and 10,000 base pairs (bp) but can handle up to 20,000 bp or so. Likewise, plasmids for amplification and growth in yeast can vary from approximately 10,000 to 30,000 bp. Viral vectors, on the other hand, often have a limited construct size and thus may require a more precise vector size. Thus, depending on vector and intended use, the number of production-phase promoters within a DNA vector will vary.

[0188] Although FIG. 7B depicts recombination sites, cloning sites, and terminator sequences, it should be noted that these sequences may or may not be included in various embodiments of DNA vectors having multiple production-phase promoters. The incorporation of these sequences or other various sequences is often dependent on the purpose of the DNA vector. For example, cloning vectors may not include a terminator sequence if that sequence is to be incorporated into an expression construct at another stage of assembly.

[0189] FIG. 8A depicts an exemplary heterologous expression vector having a production-phase promoter for expression in yeast, in accordance with various embodiments of the disclosure. Expression constructs contain an expression cassette that has a promoter, a heterologous gene, and a terminator sequence in order to produce an RNA molecule in an appropriate host. Expression cassette in accordance with numerous embodiments will have a production-phase promoter situated proximately upstream of a heterologous gene of which the promoter is to regulate expression. It should be understood, that the precise location of the production-phase promoter upstream of the heterologous gene may vary, but the promoter generally is within a certain proximity to adequately function.

[0190] In many embodiments of the disclosure, a heterologous gene is any gene driven by a production-phase promoter, wherein the heterologous gene is different than the endogenous gene that the promoter regulates within its endogenous genome. Accordingly, a S. cerevisiae production-phase promoter could regulate another S. cerevisiae gene provided that the gene to be regulated is not the gene endogenously regulated. For example, the S. cerevisiae ADH2 promoter should not regulate the S. cerevisiae ADH2 gene; however, the S. cerevisiae ADH2 promoter can regulate any other S. cerevisiae gene or the ADH2 gene from any other species. Often, in accordance with many embodiments, the heterologous gene is from a different species than the species from which the production-promoter sequence was obtained.

[0191] Although not depicted, various embodiments of expression cassettes may include other sequences, such as, for example, intron sequences, Kozak-like sequences, and/or protein tag sequences (e.g., 6×-His) that may or may not improve expression, production, and/or purification. In yeast, various embodiments of expression vectors will also minimally have a yeast origin of replication (e.g., 2-micron) and an auxotrophic marker (e.g., URA3) in addition to the expression cassette. Other nonessential sequences may also be included, such as, for example, bacterial origins of replication and/or bacterial selection markers that would render the expression capable of amplification in a bacterial host in addition to a yeast host. Accordingly, various embodiments of expression vectors would include the essential sequences for heterologous expression in yeast and other various embodiments would include additional nonessential sequences.

[0192] In accordance with various embodiments, a DNA vector having a production-phase promoter expression cassette can be transformed into a yeast cell. Or alternatively, and in accordance with numerous embodiments, a DNA vector having a production-phase promoter expression cassette can be assembled within yeast using homologous recombination techniques. Once existing within a yeast cell, the production-phase promoter can regulate the expression of a heterologous gene in accordance with the yeast cell's energy metabolism. As described previously, and in accordance with many embodiments, production-phase promoters repress heterologous expression when the yeast cell is in an anaerobic energy metabolic state. Alternatively, and in accordance with a number of embodiments, production-phase promoters induce heterologous expression when the yeast cell is in an aerobic energy metabolic state

[0193] Depicted in FIG. 8B are alternative exemplary heterologous expression vectors having multiple production-phase promoters for expression of multiple genes in yeast in accordance with numerous embodiments. In some embodiments, the expression vectors will include at least two expression cassettes, each with a unique promoter, gene, and terminator sequence in order to prevent unwanted recombination. The number of expression cassettes will vary based on vector construct design and application. For heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae, it has been found that plasmid expression vectors of approximately 30,000 bp are still tolerated. Thus, vectors containing up to seven production-phase promoter expression cassettes can be incorporated into an expression vector and have been found to be able to maintain adequate gene expression and protein production. Larger vectors with more expression cassettes may be tolerated.

[0194] Although FIG. 8B depicts multiple expression cassettes sequentially in the same orientation (5′ to 3′), it should be understood that the combination of two or more expression cassettes is not limited to sequential linear organization in the same orientation. Expression cassettes in accordance with many embodiments exist within the expression vector in any orientation and in any sequential order. Furthermore, it should be understood that other sequence elements of an expression vector (e.g., an auxotrophic marker) may be among and/or between the multiple expression cassettes. Optimal vector design is likely to depend on various factors, such as, for example, optimizing the location of the auxotrophic marker to enable the final expression vector to include each expression cassette to be incorporated.

[0195] DNA heterologous expression vectors are a class of DNA vectors, and thus the description of general DNA vectors above also applies to the expression vectors. Accordingly, many embodiments of the expression vectors are formulated into a plasmid vector, a viral vector, a circular vector, or a kit of linear DNA fragments to be recombined into a plasmid by yeast homologous recombination. In several of these embodiments, the end-product vector contains at least one expression cassette having a production-phase promoter. It should be understood, that in addition to the at least one production-phase promoter, some vector embodiments incorporate expression cassettes that include other promoters, such as (but not limited to), constitutive promoters that maintain high expression during the growth and production phases.

[0196] The various embodiments of heterologous expression vectors having at least one production-phase promoter can be used in numerous applications. For example, high expression in the production phase can lead to better, prolonged expression, as compared to constitutive promoters. In many applications, the end product is a protein from a single gene or a protein complex of multiple genes to be purified from the culture. For these applications, high, prolonged expression using production-phase promoters can lead to better yields of proteins. Furthermore, when the heterologous protein is toxic to the host yeast cells, the use of production-phase promoters prevents the expression of the toxic protein during growth phase, allowing the yeast to reach a healthy confluency before mass protein production.

[0197] The production-phase promoter vectors can also benefit the production of a biosynthetic compound from a gene cluster. Many products derived from various natural species are produced from a cluster of genes with sequential enzymatic activity. For example, the antibiotic emindole SB is produced from a cluster of four genes that is expressed in Aspergillus tubingensis. To reproduce this gene cluster in a yeast production model, a production-promoter vector system with four different expression cassettes could work. This system would allow the yeast to reach a healthy confluency before the energy-draining expression of four heterologous proteins begins, leading to better overall yields of the antibiotic product. In fact, experimental results provided in an exemplary embodiment described in Example 1 below demonstrate that a production-phase promoter vector outperformed a constitutive promoter vector approximately 2-fold to produce the emindole SB product.

[0198] FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary process (Process 400) to implement various embodiments of production-phase promoters. To begin, Process 400 identifies and selects at least one gene for heterologous expression in yeast (401). The choice of gene(s) for expression would depend on the desired outcome. For example, to produce a biosynthetic compound, one would likely select to express all, or a subset, of the genes within a biosynthetic gene cluster of a particular organism. Once the gene(s) have been selected, Process 400 then appropriates DNA molecules having the coding sequence of the selected genes (403). As is well known in the art, there are many ways to appropriate DNA molecules, which include chemical synthesis, extraction directly from the biological source, or amplification of a gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

[0199] Process 400 then uses the appropriated DNA molecules to assemble these molecules into an expression vector having production-phase promoters (405). There are many ways to assemble DNA expression vectors that are well known in the art, which include popular methodologies such as homologous recombination and restriction digestion with subsequent ligation. After assembly, the resultant expression vectors can be expressed in Saccharomyces yeast to obtain the desired outcome (407).

Yeast Homologous Recombination for Plasmid Construction and Direct Plasmid Sequencing

[0200] Each of the one or more expression vectors may contain one or more promoters suitable for expression of a heterologous gene in a model host system. Each expression vector may contain a single coding sequence or multiple coding sequences. Multiple coding sequences may be functionally linked to a single promoter, for example via an internal ribosome entry site, or may be linked to multiple promoters. The expression vectors may also contain additional elements to regulate or increase the transcriptional activity, for example enhancers, polyA sequences, introns, and posttranscriptional stability elements. The expression vectors may also contain one or more selectable markers.

[0201] To improve high-throughput assembly and characterization of orphan biosynthetic systems or other systems, an automated DNA assembly pipeline using yeast homologous recombination, (YHR), as its core technology was developed. An example of the design strategy for assembling DNA parts for this pipeline is illustrated in FIG. 10A. In one embodiment a method is provided for assembling synthetic gene clusters with heterologous regulation. DNA polynucleotides coding for a series of distinct promoters and terminators may be obtained in bulk and used for a variety of different synthetic gene clusters. Once a gene cluster of interest is identified the coding sequences are determined and then all coding sequences are synthesized with a flanking sequence (assembly overhang) on each side. The assembly overhangs, encode either for the flanking promoter and terminator if the gene is small enough to be ordered as a single piece, or for the adjacent gene fragments for longer sequences. The length of the flanking sequences may vary, In some cases, the flanking sequences may be about 30 bp, 40 bp, 50 bp, 60 bp, 70 bp, 80 bp, 90 bp, 100 bp, 30-100 bp, 30-70 bp, 40-60 bp, 40-80 bp, or 45-55 bp in length. Placing assembly overhangs exclusively on the unique coding sequence fragments allows for all regulatory cassettes to be generated in bulk and stockpiled as the same fragments are used in all assemblies. For example, in an assembly involving three or more genes, an auxotrophic marker may be placed between the second terminator and third terminator while no marker is present on the vector. By providing the auxotrophic marker and origin of replication on separate fragments, reaction background was significantly reduced. Additional modest increases in efficiency were observed when the assembly host is lacking a DNA ligase, such as the DNL4 DNA ligase.

[0202] In some embodiments, this disclosure provides a system for generating a synthetic gene cluster via homologous recombination. The system comprises 1 though N unique promoter sequences, 1 through N unique terminator sequences, and 1 through N unique coding sequences. Each terminator sequence may be linked to the following promoter sequence, for example terminator 1 is linked to promoter 2, terminator 2 is linked to promoter 3, and so forth till terminator N-1 which is linked to promoter N. In some cases, promoter 1 and terminator N may be attached to a linear plasmid backbone. Coding sequence 1 is attached to an additional 30-70 base pair sequence on each end such that a first end portion is identical or homologous to the last 30-70 base pairs of promoter 1 and a second end portion is identical or homologous to the first 30-70 base pairs of terminator 1. Coding sequence 2 is attached to an additional 30-70 base pair sequence on each end such that a first end portion is identical or homologous to the last 30-70 base pairs of promoter 2 and a second end portion is identical or homologous to the first 30-70 base pairs of terminator 2. Coding sequence N is also attached to an additional 30-70 base pair sequence on each end such that a first end portion is identical or homologous to the last 30-70 base pairs of promoter N and a second end portion is identical or homologous to the first 30-70 base pairs of terminator N. These DNA fragments may be assembled transforming the 1 through N promoters, terminators and coding sequences into a yeast cell where they are combined through yeast homologous recombination, and then isolating a plasmid containing the 1 through N promoters, terminators and coding sequences from the yeast cell.

[0203] An example of this system is shown in FIG. 10A. In this example N equals four. The system comprises four unique promoters (110, 120, 130 and 140), four unique terminator sequences (210, 220, 230 and 240), and four unique coding sequences (310, 320, 330, and 340). Each of the coding sequences is created with an additional 30-70 base pair sequence that is homologous or identical to the sequence of the preceding promoter and an additional 30-70 base pair sequence that is homologous or identical to the sequence of the subsequent terminator. Thus, coding sequence 310 is flanked by sequence 111 which is identical or homologous to at least a part of sequence 110, and sequence 211 which is identical or homologous to an least a part of sequence 210. Coding sequence 320 is flanked by sequence 121 which is identical or homologous to at least a part of sequence 120, and sequence 221 which is identical or homologous to an least a part of sequence 220. Coding sequence 330 is flanked by sequence 131 which is identical or homologous to at least a part of sequence 130, and sequence 231 which is identical or homologous to an least a part of sequence 230. Coding sequence 340 is flanked by sequence 141 which is identical or homologous to at least a part of sequence 140, and sequence 241 which is identical or homologous to an least a part of sequence 240. In this example promoter sequence 110 and terminator sequence 240 are attached to the ends of a linearized plasmid backbone, and the DNA fragment comprising terminator 210 and promoter 120 further comprises an auxotrophic marker (400). Terminator 210 is linked to promoter 120, terminator 220 is linked to promoter 130, and terminator 230 is linked to promoter 140.

[0204] As shown in FIG. 10B, once the DNA sequences from FIG. 10A are transfected into a yeast cell the homologous sequences are paired up and the fragments are linked together through yeast homologous recombination. The resultant DNA plasmid is illustrated in FIG. 10C.

[0205] Traditionally, for yeast homologous recombination plasmid assemblies, plasmid DNA is isolated from assembly clones and transformed into E. coli in order to obtain sufficiently pure DNA to enable sequencing. The necessity of this step arises from the relatively low plasmid yields from yeast and the large amounts of contaminating genomic DNA in every sample. This disclosure provides a method by which plasmid DNA may be sequenced directly out of yeast. This may be achieved by a modified plasmid prep in which the majority of contaminating DNA is removed by treatment with an exonuclease enzyme. Any enzyme with exonuclease activity and free of endonuclease activity may be used in this step. Examples of exonuclease enzymes include but are not limited to: Lambda Exonuclease, RecJf, Exonuclease III (E. coli), Exonuclease I (E. coli), Exonuclease T, Exonuclease V (RecBCD), Exonuclease VIII, truncated, Exonuclease VII, T5 Exonuclease, and T7 Exonuclease. In some cases, the exonuclease is Exonuclease V. If an exonuclease with activity for single stranded DNA (ssDNA) and not double stranded DNA (dsDNA) is to be used, then the DNA may first be heated to denature the dsDNA. In some cases, the DNA may be treated with a topoisomerase to relax supercoiled plasmids. In some cases, the DNA may not be treated with a topoisomerase. Once the plasmid DNA has been purified by this method sequencing libraries can be prepared. FIG. 10D demonstrates the increase in purity observed with the exonuclease treatment. Overall, this pipeline has been applied to the sequencing of >1000 clones. Assemblies of up to 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 or more than 30 unique DNA fragments can be achieved with high efficiency. FIG. 10E shows efficient assembly of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 DNA fragments. In some cases a strain as described herein allows DNA assembly via homologous recombination with an efficiency of at least 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, or more than 150% as compared to DNA assembly in BY.

[0206] To increase the efficiency of assemblies by yeast homologous repair, the relative efficiencies of BY4743 and BY4743ADNL4 were tested; a strain in which the DNL4 ligase, involved in non-homologous end joining, has been deleted. FIG. 11A illustrates efficiencies of several plasmid assemblies done in both strains, demonstrating the deletion of the DNL4 DNA ligase does consistently serve as the more efficient assembly background.

[0207] The sequencing of plasmid DNA directly out of yeast as in FIG. 11E (e.g. without transforming into another host such as E. coli as in FIG. 11D) is an advantage of the methods described herein. In establishing these methods, multiple means of preparation for both the plasmid DNA and the next-generation sequencing (NGS) library prep were tested. Shown in FIG. 11B is a comparison of sequencing efficiency using DNA prepared both from colonies picked from plates and cell pellets collected from 1 ml of liquid culture. These data show that these approaches generate samples of equivalent purity.

[0208] Initially, the platform utilized an NGS library preparation in which the purified, exonuclease treated plasmid DNA was ultrasonically sheared, followed by end repair, A-tailing, and adaptor ligation. In order to decrease labor and increase throughput, a recently published modification of the Illumina NexeraXT transposase based prep was performed (M. Baym, et al., PLoS One 10:e01280367, 2015). Ultrasonic shearing necessitated the serial processing of multiple plates of clones while tagmentation allows for parallel processing of multiple plates. FIG. 11C demonstrates that this modified Nextera preparation provides equivalent efficiency as compared to the standard approach.

[0209] This approach may be suitable for multiple DNA preparation methods in multiple strain backgrounds. Additionally, it was shown that this approach is compatible with various library preparations for sequencing on Illumina platforms. It is anticipated that this approach could be easily modified to function in sequencing workflows using alternate sequencing platforms such as those provided by Pacific Bioscience and Oxford Nanopore technologies.

Host Cells

[0210] The expression vectors may be transfected into a host cell to produce secondary metabolites. The host cell may be any cell capable of expressing the coding sequences from the expression vectors. The host cell may be a cell which can be grown and maintained at a high density. For example the host cell may be one which may be grown and maintained in a bioreactor or fermenter. The host cell may be a fungal cell, a yeast cell, a plant cell, an insect cell or a mammalian cell.

[0211] In some cases the host cell is bacterial. The bacteria may be a Proteobacteria such as a Caulobacteria, a phototrophic bacteria, a cold adapted bacteria, a Pseudomonads, or a Halophilic bacteria; an Actinobacteria such as Streptomycetes, Norcardia, Mycobacteria, or Coryneform; a Firmicutes bacteria such as a Bacilli, or a lactic acid bacteria. Examples of bacteria which may be used include, but are not limited to: Caulobacter crescentus, Rodhobacter sphaeroides, Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, Shewanella sp. strain Ac10, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Halomonas elongata, Chromohalobacter salexigens, Streptomyces lividans, Streptomyces griseus, Nocardia lactamdurans, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Brevibacterium lactofermentum, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus gasseri.

[0212] In some cases the host cell is a fungal cell. In some cases, the host cell is a yeast cell. Examples of yeast cells include, but are not limited to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pombe, Candida albicans, and Cryptococus neoformans. In some cases the host cell may be a filamentous fungi, such as a mold. Examples of molds include, but are not limited to Acremonium, Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Mucor, Penicillium, and Rhizopus. In some cases, the host cell may be an Acremonium cell. In some cases, the host cell may be an Alternaria cell. In some cases, the host cell may be an Aspergillus cell. In some cases, the host cell may be an Cladosporium cell. In some cases, the host cell may be an Fusarium cell. In some cases, the host cell may be a Mucor cell. In some cases, the host cell may be a Penicillium cell. In some cases, the host cell may be a Rhizopus cell.

[0213] In some cases, the host cell is an insect cell. In some cases the host cell is a mammalian cell. Examples of mammalian cell lines include HeLa cells, HEK293 cells, B16 melanoma cells, Chinese hamster ovary cells, or HT1080. In some cases, the host cell is a plant cell. In some cases, the host cell may be part of a multicellular host organism.

[0214] In some cases, the host cell is a genetically engineered cell. The yeast strain BJ5464 has historically been a workhorse strain for expression of heterologous proteins. BJ5464 lacks two vacuolar proteases genes (PEP4 and PRB1), which makes the strain useful for biochemical studies, owing to reduced protein degradation. However, BJ5464 has several problems that limit its utility. It has a high rate of petite cell formation, which results in offspring that cannot respire (grow on ethanol as a carbon source) and cannot express the respiration-induced promoters used in this project. It is not genetically tractable because it cannot sporulate, and its non-deletion auxotrophic markers prevent facile genome editing. Finally, BJ5464 is slow growing.

[0215] This disclosure includes a new yeast super host based on the BY background. BY is a direct descendent of the yeast genome sequence reference strain and contains the complete deletions of auxotrophic markers that facilitate genome editing. It is the basis of the barcoded deletion collection, which has led to a wealth of genetic and chemico-genomic data. However, it also has major problems limiting its utility. In particular, it has the poorest sporulation frequency and highest petite frequency of all common lab strains.

[0216] The petite phenotype arises due to a defect in aerobic respiration. Petite yeasts are unable to grow on non-fermentable carbon sources (for example glycerol or ethanol), and form small anaerobic-sized colonies when grown in the presence of fermentable carbon sources (for example glucose). The phenotype results from mutations in the mitochondrial genome, loss of mitochondria, or mutations in the host cell genome.

[0217] The genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) responsible for the sporulation and respiration defects have been identified (FIG. 12). The sporulation defect may be repaired by a series of genetic crosses to a previously repaired strain. The respiration problem caused by mitochondrial genome instability may also be corrected using genome editing. Genome editing may be performed with any method know in the art, such as the 50:50 method. (J. Horecka and R. W. Davis. Yeast 31:103-12, 2014). In some cases, an improved version of Mega 50:50 may be used in which a double stranded break is introduced into the genomic locus to be modified, increasing efficiency by several orders of magnitude (J. D. Smith, et al., Mol. Syst. Biol. 13:913, 2017).

[0218] In some cases, the host cell may be a cell which has been engineered to repair a sporulation defect. For example, the host cell may be a fungal cell with a repaired sporulation defect. In some cases, the host cell is a yeast cell with a repaired sporulation defect. In some cases, the host cell is a BY yeast cell in which the sporulation defect has been repaired, as in FIG. 12.

[0219] In some cases, the host cell may be a cell which has been engineered to repair a respiratory defect or a mitochondrial genome instability defect. For example, the host cell may be a fungal cell with a repaired mitochondrial stability defect. In some cases, the host cell is a yeast cell with a repaired mitochondrial stability defect. In some cases, the host cell is a BY yeast cell in which the mitochondrial genome instability defect has been repaired, as in FIG. 12. In some cases, the host cell may be a cell in which both a sporulation defect and a mitochondrial genomic instability defect have been repaired. Using the genetic crosses and genome engineering methods discussed above and the genomic repairs outlined in FIG. 12 the BY strain was engineered to repair the mitochondrial genome instability. An unexpected benefit of repairing the mitochondrial genome instability defect was that the strains grew faster on non-fermentable carbon sources, such as ethanol (see FIGS. 13 and 14A). This is commonly the growth condition of choice for expression of heterologous genes, which are often linked to production-phase promoters activated by growth on non-fermentable carbon sources.

[0220] In some cases, the host cell may be genetically engineered to lack a gene involved in non-homologous end joining. The lack of such a gene may increase the efficacy of homologous recombination in such an engineered cell. The appropriate genes to delete may vary in each host. As an example, an engineered yeast host cell may lack a ligase such as the DNL4 DNA ligase. An engineered bacterial host cell may lack one or both of a Ku homodimer and the multifunctional ligase/polymerase/nuclease LigD. Other genes which may be involved in non-homologous double stranded break repair, depending on species, include: Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2, Nbs1, DNA-PKcs, Ku70, Ku80, DNA ligase IV, XLF, Artemis, XRCC4, Dn14, Lif1, XLF also known as Cernunnos, Nej1 and Sir2.

[0221] DHY strains have utility for expression of heterologous genes for heterologous compound production, as well as ability to perform homologous recombination and DNA assembly. This combination of abilities in one strain allows DNA assembly and production of heterologous compounds in the same strain, whereas previously these two steps were separated in previous types of yeast (BY for DNA assembly and BJ5464 for expression and small molecule production).

[0222] These improvements can provide the DHY strain collection with a number of advantages over previous strains, particularly the BY strains: DHY can be faster-growing, result in fewer petite colonies (respiration-deficient), be genetically tractable, allow better expression from ADH2-like promoters, and allow both DNA assembly and production of heterologous products in the same strain (FIGS. 14B and 14C).

[0223] In some embodiments, a genetically engineered host cell lacks one or more conditionally essential genes which can be provided by a plasmid or other DNA vector. This allows for the selection of cells which are expressing the DNA vector. Examples of genes which may be used for this are auxotrophic genes which are required for biosynthesis of certain metabolites or genes for resistance to a toxin. Auxotrophic genes are only required when the specific metabolite they are required for is not present in the culture media. Resistance genes are only required when the toxin which they provide protection from is present.

[0224] Examples of genetically engineered yeast host cells include genetically engineered DHY super-host strains. In some cases, strains are based on the BY4741/BY4742 background (C. B. Brachmann, et al, Yeast, 14:115-32, 1998). Strains may also contain any of the following genetic changes from the BY background: sporulation repair (MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q)), and mitochondrial genome stability and function repair (CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) SAL 1+ HAP1+) (see FIG. 12). It should be noted, as would be understood in by persons having ordinary skill in the art, that any and all these genetic changes can be performed in isolation, in part, or in totality. For example, it is expected that the a single genetic change of either MKT1(30G), RME1(INS-308A), or TA03(1493Q) would result in at least some repair in sporulation activity. Likewise, a single genetic change of either CAT5(91M) or MIP1(661T) or restoration of function of SAL1 (SAL1 +) or HAP1 (HAP1+) would result in at least some increase in mitochondrial genome stability.

[0225] In some cases, a strain may be a prototroph. For example, some strains may require methionine, arginine or lysine in the media. In some cases, a strain may be a full heterozygote for several markers from which any combination of markers can be made by tetrad dissection. For example, heterozygous for genes required for synthesis of histidine, leucine, uracil, lysine and methionine, or heterozygous for genes required for synthesis of histidine, leucine, uracil, lysine and arginine. Some examples of strains are listed in Table 3.

[0226] In some cases, the use of a strain as described herein allows for greater expression of BGC proteins and/or greater production of compounds from the BGCs. In some cases expression of heterologous proteins in a strain described herein is accomplished with an efficiency of at least 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, or 150% as compared to heterologous protein expression in BJ5464. In some cases production of heterologous compounds in a strain described herein is accomplished with an efficiency of at least 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, or 150% as compared to heterologous compound production in BJ5464.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Description of strain genotypes Strain Parent Genotype Reference BY4741 S288C MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 (C. B. Brachmann, et ura3Δ0 al., 1998, cited supra) BY4743 S288C MATa/α his3Δ1/his3Δ1 (C. B. Brachmann, et leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0 LYS2/lys2Δ0 al., 1998, cited supra) met15Δ0/MET15 ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0 BJ5464 MATα ura3-52 trp1 leu2-Δ1 his3- (E. W. Jones, Methods Δ200 pep4::HIS3 prb1-Δ1.6R Enzymol. 194: 428-53, can1 GAL 1991) BY4743ΔDNL4 S288C MATa/Matα dnl4Δ/dnl4Δ (E. A. Winzeler, et al., Science 285: 901-06, 1999) Y800 MATa ade2-1 leu2-Δ98 ura3-52 (N. Burns, et al., Genes lys2-801 trp1-1 his3-Δ200 [cir0] Dev. 8: 1087-105, 1994) DHY213 BY4741 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 n/a met15Δ0 SAL1+ HAP1+ CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q) JHY693 DHY213 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 n/a met15Δ0 SAL1+ HAP1+ CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q) prb1Δ pep4Δ JHY651 DHY213 MATα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 n/a met15Δ0 SAL1+ HAP1+ CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q) prb1Δ pep4Δ lys2Δ0 JHY692 DHY213 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 n/a met15Δ0 SAL1+ HAP1+ CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q) prb1Δ pep4Δ ADH2p-npgA-ACS1t JHY705 DHY213 MATα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 n/a met15Δ0 SAL1+ HAP1+ CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A) TAO3(1493Q) prb1Δ pep4Δ ADH2p-CPR-ACS1t lys2Δ0 JHY702 DHY213 MATa/MATα his3Δ1/his3Δ1 n/a leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0 met15Δ0/met15Δ0 SAL1+/SAL1+ HAP1+/HAP1+ CAT5(91M)/CAT5(91M) MIP1(661T)/MIP1(661T) MKT1(30G)/MKT1(30G) RME1(INS-308A)/RME1(INS- 308A) TAO3(1493Q/TAO3(1493Q)) prb1Δ/prb1Δ pep4Δ/pep4Δ ADH2p-npgA-ACS1t/ADH2p- CPR-ACS1t met15Δ0/+lys2Δ0/+

Detection and Characterization of Novel Molecules

[0227] Once a host cell is expressing the coding sequences of the identified gene cluster, a secondary metabolite may be synthesized in the host cell. The secondary metabolite may be identified by any method known in the art. In some cases, the secondary metabolite is identified by comparing a host cell expressing the cluster with a host cell which does not express the cluster. This comparison may utilize chromatography methods to separate different small molecules produced in the cells. For example, column chromatography, planar chromatography, thin layer chromatography, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, size exclusion chromatography be done by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), mass spectrometry (MS), or by mass spectrometry high performance liquid chromatography (MS-HPLC). Any peaks which appear for the cluster expressing host cell and not from the control host cell indicate the presence of a novel chemical. The comparison between the cluster expressing host cell and the control host cell may comprise a comparison of a cell extract, a culture media, or an extracted cell lysate.

Compounds Identified

[0228] This disclosure also provides sequences of 43 BGCs, and structures of novel products produced by a subset of these BGCs.

[0229] In one embodiment, this disclosure provides sequences of cryptic BGCs which encode various products, SEQ ID NOs: 67-483. These BGCs may also be reengineered to provide the coding sequences without the endogenous regulatory sequences. In some examples, the coding sequences may be predicted using known bioinformatics methods, experimental data, or obtained from databases such as default predicted gene coordinates (start, stop, and introns) as deposited in GenBank. Once the coding sequences have been identified the sequences may be isolated and cloned into one or more expression vectors for expression in a model host system such as S. cerevisiae.

[0230] The expression vectors may be plasmids, viruses, linear DNA, bacterial artificial chromosomes or yeast artificial chromosomes. Each of the one or more expression vectors may contain one or more promoters suitable for expression of a heterologous gene in a model host system. Each expression vector may contain a single coding sequence or multiple coding sequences. Multiple coding sequences may be functionally linked to a single promoter, for example via an internal ribosome entry site, or may be linked to multiple promoters. The expression vectors may also contain additional elements to regulate or increase the transcriptional activity, for example enhancers, polyA sequences, introns, and posttranscriptional stability elements. The expression vectors may also contain one or more selectable markers.

[0231] The expression vectors may be transfected, or otherwise introduced, into host cells. Examples of host cells include but are not limited to yeast and bacterial cells. For example a host cell may be a S. cerevisiae cell or an E. coli cell. Incubating the expression vectors in the host cells allows for the transcription and translation of the coding sequences to recreate the proteins of the gene cluster. These proteins may then produce a secondary metabolite which can be isolated from the cells or the media in which the cells are grown.

[0232] In another embodiment this disclosure provides host cell extracts containing non-host cell derived products. In some cases, these extracts may be produced by culturing host cells expressing one or more, or all, of the sequences from one of the following groups SEQ ID NOs: 67-76, 77-81, 82-91, 92-97, 98-106, 107-111, 112-118, 119-127, 128-135, 136-153, 154-157, 158-162, 163-172, 173-181, 182-186, 187-191, 192-199, 200-206, 207-211, 212-224, 225-228, 229-235, 236-240, 241-244, 245-255, 256-267, 268-276, 277-285, 286-289, 290-293, 294-307, 308-313, 314-318, 319-324, 325-329, 330-334, 335-341, 342-350, 351-357, 358-367, 368-372, 373-380, 381-388, 389-395, 396-400, 401-406, 407-413, 414-423, 424-427, 428-439, 440-447, 448-453, 454-462, 463-471, 472-480, or 481-483. In some cases, a host cell may express all the sequences from one of the following groups SEQ ID NOs: 67-76, 77-81, 82-91, 92-97, 98-106, 107-111, 112-118, 119-127, 128-135, 136-153, 154-157, 158-162, 163-172, 173-181, 182-186, 187-191, 192-199, 200-206, 207-211, 212-224, 225-228, 229-235, 236-240, 241-244, 245-255, 256-267, 268-276, 277-285, 286-289, 290-293, 294-307, 308-313, 314-318, 319-324, 325-329, 330-334, 335-341, 342-350, 351-357, 358-367, 368-372, 373-380, 381-388, 389-395, 396-400, 401-406, 407-413, 414-423, 424-427, 428-439, 440-447, 448-453, 454-462, 463-471, 472-480, or 481-483. In some cases the host cell(s) may express one or more sequences selected from SEQ ID NOs: 67-483. After culturing the cells, they may be collected, lysed, and the small molecules may be purified from nucleic acid, proteins, complex carbohydrates and lipid containing fractions. The secondary metabolites produced may also be secreted into the cell media. In this case this disclosure also provides a cell media containing secondary metabolites.

[0233] This disclosure also provides compounds isolated from the host cell extracts or media. A compound of this disclosure may be

##STR00001## ##STR00002## ##STR00003##

[0234] Compounds of this disclosure may have useful therapeutic applications, for example in treating or preventing a disease or disorder. Compounds of this disclosure may be used to treat an infection, for example a bacterial, fungal or parasitic infection. Compounds of this disclosure may have antibiotic and/or antifungal activities. Compound 8 and Compound 9 may have antimicrobial, antifungal and/or antibacterial activities. Compounds of this disclosure may have non-medical applications.

[0235] In some embodiments this disclosure provides pharmaceutical compositions comprising of a compound of this disclosure. In some cases a pharmaceutical composition contains at least one of Compounds: 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Compositions as described herein may comprise a liquid formulation, a solid formulation or a combination thereof. Non-limiting examples of formulations may include a tablet, a capsule, a gel, a paste, a liquid solution and a cream. The compositions of the present disclosure may further comprise any number of excipients. Excipients may include any and all solvents, coatings, flavorings, colorings, lubricants, disintegrants, preservatives, sweeteners, binders, diluents, and vehicles (or carriers). Generally, the excipient is compatible with the therapeutic compositions of the present disclosure. Generally, the excipient is a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. The pharmaceutical composition may also contain minor amounts of non-toxic auxiliary substances such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering agents, and other substances such as, for example, sodium acetate, and triethanolamine oleate.

[0236] In some embodiments this disclosure provides a method of synthesizing a compound described herein. The method may include steps of providing one or more coding sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 67-483 in a suitable vector, or vectors, together with regulatory sequences which will drive expression of the coding sequences in a host cell. The vector, or vectors, are then provided to a host cell, such as for example a yeast cell, and the cells are grown under conditions that allow for the expression of the coding sequences. In some cases, a host cell may be provided with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more than 6 different plasmids. The synthesized compound may be purified from the cell culture by centrifuging the cells to produce a cell pellet and a supernatant. The supernatant and cell pellet may be extracted using either ethyl acetate or acetone, or other suitable organic solvent. For compounds containing carboxylic acid groups, the pH of the supernatant may be adjusted to pH of 4 or less (e.g., 3) with an acid such as HCl prior to extraction. After extraction, both organic phases are combined and evaporated to dryness. The compounds may then be dissolved in the desired solvent and further purified using standard purification methods.

[0237] Although the present disclosure has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. In particular, any of the various processes described above can be performed in alternative sequences in order to achieve similar results in a manner that is more appropriate to the requirements of a specific application. It is therefore to be understood that embodiments of the present disclosure can be practiced otherwise than specifically described without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure. Thus, embodiments of the present disclosure should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

EXAMPLE 1

Identification of Production Phase Promoters

[0238] Biological data supports the systems and constructs of production-phase promoter DNA vectors and applications thereof. Provided below are several examples of incorporating production-phase promoters into DNA vectors. Some of these vectors were used to produce biosynthetic products from multi-gene clusters derived from various fungal species. Compared to a constitutive promoter system, production-phase promoter systems in accordance with various embodiments produced several-fold greater product.

[0239] Production Phase Promoter Expression Analysis

[0240] Because the ADH2 promoter (SEQ ID NO. 1) has properties of a production-phase promoter, a panel of promoter sequences was compared to the ADH2 promoter to identify other production-phase promoters. To begin, endogenous S. cerevisiae genes were identified that appeared co-regulated with ADH2 in a previous genome-wide transcription study (Z. Xu. et al., Nature 457:1033-37, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference). In this study, transcription of yeast genes was quantified during mid-exponential growth in several types of growth media. Of the 5171 ORFs examined, 35 appeared co-regulated with ADH2, with co-regulation defined as a greater than two-fold increase in expression with a non-fermentable carbon source (ethanol in a yeast-peptone-ethanol (YPE) media) as compared to a fermentable carbon source (dextrose in a yeast-peptone-dextrose (YPD) media). Because these data were collected at a single time point and assessed transcription of genes in their native context, their ability to co-regulate heterologous genes in a production-phase promoter system required further validation and characterization.

[0241] A detailed characterization of the ability of 34 selected promoters to control expression of heterologous genes was performed. For this specific purpose, a promoter was defined as the shorter of (a) 500 bp upstream of the start codon, or (b) the entire 5′ intergenic region. Each promoter was cloned upstream of the gene for monomeric enhanced GFP (eGFP) and integrated each of the resulting cassettes in a single copy at the ho locus of individual strains. Control strains were included in which strong constitutive FBA1 and TDH3 promoters were cloned upstream of eGFP in an identical manner. The 35 promoter sequences can be found in SEQ ID NOs. 2-35.

[0242] In order to compare the 35 putative production-phase promoters, the expression of eGFP protein was assessed over 72 hours in each strain by flow cytometry in media with both fermentable (YPD) and non-fermentable (YPE) carbon sources (FIGS. 16 and 17). All cultures were started in YPD media and analysis of eGFP expression began when cells were in the midst of exponential fermentative growth (OD.sub.600=0.4, 0 hrs). At this point, cells were either left to continue growth in YPD or spun-down and resuspended in YPE. Consistent with previous work, pADH2 was entirely repressed at the point where the experiment commenced (during exponential fermentative growth, 0 hrs) unlike the constitutive promoters pTDH3 and pFBA1, which were expressed at near maximum levels regardless of phase. Moderate expression from pADH2 was observed after a further 6 hours in YPD culture or following a growth media switch to YPE. Within 24 hrs, expression reached levels exceeding those observed in the strong constitutive systems. Cytometry histograms and fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that within 48 hours, >95% of all cells with pADH2 and pPCK1 driven expression were fluorescing above background (FIG. 18). Protein expression levels spanned 15-50 fold, with most showing little or no expression until 24 hours into the culture (FIGS. 16 and 17). Transgene expression driven by the PCK1, MLS1, and ICL1 promoters (SEQ ID NOs. 2-4) not only showed the same timing of expression as pADH2, but also expressed at an equivalently high level. The promoters of genes YLR307C-A, YGRO67C, IDP2, ADY2, GAC1, ECM13 and FAT3 (SEQ ID NOs. 5-11) displayed semi-strong transgene expression (FIG. 16). In addition, the promoters of genes PUT1, NQM1, SFC1, JEN1, SIP18, ATO2, YIG1, and FBP1 (SEQ ID NOs. 12-19) displayed weak of transgene expression (FIGS. 16 and 17). The promoter PH089 (SEQ ID NO. 20) did not exhibit strong repression in during the growth phase (FIG. 16, 0 and 6 hours). The results of the other sequences are also depicted in FIG. 16 (SEQ ID NOs. 22-36). The constitutive promoters pTDH3 and pFBA1 (SEQ ID NOs. 50 and 52) were used as controls (FIGS. 16-18).

[0243] The above analysis identified a large set of co-regulated promoters spanning a wide range of expression levels, three of which were as strong as pADH2. However, a more extensive set of strong production-phase promoters is desirable for assembly of constructs having multi-gene pathways, especially pathways having more than four genes. To identify other production-phase promoter candidates, the genomes of five closely related species within the S. sensu stricto complex were examined (FIG. 19). The promoter region was identified for the closest ADH2 gene homolog in the genomes of Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces paradoxus, Saccharomyces mikitae, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii, and Saccharomyces castellii. Multiple sequence alignment of the upstream activation sequences (UAS) revealed that nearly all sequences (except that from S. castellii) are highly conserved across this region, suggesting a potential for regulation similar to that of S. cerevisiae ADH2 (FIG. 20, SEQ ID NOs. 36-40). In order to be used for single-step pathway assembly, all promoter sequences must be sufficiently unique to prevent undesired recombination between each other. Therefore, the pairwise identities for each of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto ADH2 promoter pairs were analyzed (FIG. 21). The most similar promoter to the S. cerevisiae ADH2 promoter is that from S. paradoxus, with 83% identity, including a single 40 bp stretch located near the center of the promoter. This homology is significantly less than the 50-100 bp typically used for assembly by yeast homologous recombination, and recombination events between sequences with this level of identity occur at very low frequency, suggesting that these promoters should be compatible with a multi-gene assembly technique utilizing yeast homologous recombination as described above.

[0244] As with the endogenous yeast promoter candidates, these other putative Saccharomyces promoters required detailed characterization of induction profiles. DNA encoding each of these promoter sequences was obtained by commercial synthesis and characterized expression of eGFP from each promoter in the same manner as the endogenous yeast promoters (FIGS. 22 and 23). Of the five Saccharomyces sensu stricto pADH2s tested (SEQ ID NOs. 36-40), the promoters derived from S. paradoxus, S. kudriavzevii, and S. bayanus show timing and strength of expression equivalent to that of S. cerevisiae pADH2. In combination with the endogenous yeast promoters, these three additional Saccharomyces pADH2s expand the number of strong promoters with the desired induction profile.

[0245] Expression of Compound Product Pathways Using the Production-Phase Promoter System

[0246] To study the utility of the new promoter set for heterologous expression of a biosynthetic system, production of fungal-derived dehydrozearalenol (1) and indole-diterpene (2) was examined (FIG. 24, Compounds 1 & 2). The biosynthesis of the indole-diterpene compound resulted from the coordinated expression of four in Aspergillus tubingensis genes (FIG. 25, SEQ ID NOs. 59-62). Two versions of each pathway were constructed: one having all production-phase promoters, and the other having all constitutive promoters (FIG. 24). The production-phase promoter system utilized the pADH2 from S. cerevisiae (SEQ ID NO. 1), pADH2 from S. bayanus (SEQ ID NO. 38), and pPCK1 (SEQ ID NO. 2) and pMLS1 (SEQ ID NO. 3) from S. cerevisiae. In the constitutive system, transcription was driven by four frequently used strong constitutive promoters: pTEF1, pFBA1, pPCK1, and pTPI1 (SEQ ID NOs. 51-54). Each indole-diterpene system was constructed on a single plasmid harboring four expression cassettes: promoter::GGPPS::tADH2; promoter::PT::tPGI1; promoter::FMO::tENO2; and promoter::Cyc::tTEF1; wherein, the promoter sequences corresponded to either the production-phase or the constitutive promoters (FIG. 24). Similar constructs were built for the dehydrozearalenol compound with the two genes HR-PKS and NR-PKS (SEQ ID NOs. 63 and 64). All plasmids were constructed using yeast homologous recombination. It should be noted that pADH2 sequences from S. cerevisiae and S. bayanus (61% identity) are sufficiently unique for this type of assembly. The production of compounds 1 and 2 produced by S. cerevisiae BJ5464/npgA/pRS424 transformed with each of these plasmids were measured over seventy-two hours in YPD batch culture (FIG. 26). An 80-fold and 4.5-fold increase in titer of compound 1 and 2 was observed for the system using the production-phase promoters as compared to the constitutive system.

[0247] Materials and Methods Supporting the Production-Phase Promoter Experiments

[0248] General techniques, reagents, and strain information: Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB, Ipswich, 25 MA). Cloning was performed in E. coli DH5α. PCR steps were performed using Q5® high-fidelity polymerase (NEB). Yeast dropout media was purchased from MP Biomedicals (Santa Ana, Calif.) and prepared according to manufacturer specifications. Promoter characterization experiments were performed in BY4741 (MATα, his3Δ1 leu2Δ.0 met15Δ.0 ura3.Δ0) while all experiments involving the production of 1 were performed in BJ5464-npgA which is BJ5464 (MATαura3-52 his3Δ200 leu2Δ.1 trpl pep4::HIS3 prb1.Δ.1.6R can1 GAL) with two copies of pADH2-npgA integrated at δ elements. All Gibson assemblies were performed as previously described using 30 bp assembly overhangs.

[0249] Construction and characterization of promoter-eGFP reporter strains: All promoters were defined as the shorter of 500 base pairs upstream of a gene's start codon or the entire 5′ intergenic region. All promoters from S. cerevisiae were amplified from genomic DNA, while ADH2 promoters from all Saccharomyces sensu stricto were ordered as gBlocks from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, Iowa). Minimal alterations were made to promoters from S. kudriavzevii and S. mikitae in order to meet synthesis specifications. In all constructs, eGFP was cloned directly upstream of the terminator from the CYC1 gene (tCYC1). pRS415 was digested with Sac1 and Sal1 and a Not1-eGFP-tCYC1 cassette was inserted by Gibson assembly generating pCH600. Digestion of pCH600 with Acc1 and Pml1 removed the CEN/ARS origin, which was replaced by 500 bp sequences flanking the ho locus using Gibson assembly to yield plasmid pCH600-HOint. Each of the promoters to be analyzed was amplified with appropriate assembly overhangs and inserted into pCH600-HOint digested with Not1 to generate the pCH601 plasmid series. Digestion of the pCH601 plasmid series with Asc1 generated linear integration cassettes which were transformed into S. cerevisiae BY4741 by the LiAc/PEG method. Correct integration was confirmed by PCR amplification of promoters and Sanger sequencing.

[0250] For characterization, all strains were initially grown to saturation overnight in 100 μl of YPD media. These cells were then reinoculated at an OD.sub.600 of 0.1 into 1 ml of fresh YPD and allowed to grow to OD.sub.600=0.4 to reach mid-log phase growth (approximately 6 hrs). 500 μl of each culture was pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in YPE broth for YPE data while the remaining 500 μl was used for YPD data. The 0 hour time point was collected immediately after resuspension. For each time point, 10 μl of culture was diluted in 2 ml of DI water and sonicated for three short pulses at 35% output on a Branson Sonifier. Expression data were collected for 10,000 cells using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) with the FL1 detector. Data were analyzed in R using the flowCore package.

[0251] Construction of plasmids to produce compounds in S. cerevisiae: The sequences for genes assembled on IDT producing plasmids are contained in the supporting information. Regulatory cassettes of promoters and terminators were fused using overlap extension PCR. All genes and regulatory cassettes were amplified by PCR, ensuring 60 bases of homology between all adjacent fragments. 500 ng of each purified fragment was combined with 100 ng of pRS425 linearized with Not1 and transformed into S. cerevisiae BJ5464/npgA. Sixteen clones were picked from each assembly plate and grown to saturation in 5 ml CSM-Leu medium. Plasmids were isolated, transformed into E. coli and purified prior to sequence confirmation using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Detailed plasmid maps for pCHIDT-2.1and pCHIDT-2c are shown in FIG. 27A illustrates the primers used and the assembly strategy (SEQ ID NOs. 65 and 66).

[0252] Examining the productivity of indole diterpene generating systems Plasmids pCHIDT-2.1 and pCHIDT-2c were transformed into BJ5464/npgA with pRS424 as a source of tryptophan overproduction (see, e.g., FIG. 27B). Triplicates of each strain were inoculated into CSM-Leu/−Trp medium and grown overnight (OD.sub.600=2.5-3.0). Each culture was used to inoculate 20 ml cultures in YPD medium at an OD.sub.600=0.2 and incubated with shaking at 30° C. for 3 days. Every 24 hrs, 2 mls were sampled from each culture. Supernatants were clarified by centrifugation and extracted with 2 ml ethyl acetate (EtOAc). Cell pellets were extracted with 2 ml 50% EtOAc in acetone. 500 μl each of pellet and supernatant extracts were combined and dried in vacuo. Samples were resuspended in 100 μl HPLC grade methanol and LC-MS analysis was conducted on a Shimadzu LC-MS-2020 liquid chromatography mass spectrometer with a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 reverse-phase column (1.7 μm, 100 Å, 100 mm×2.1 mm) with a linear gradient of 15% to 95% acetonitrile (v/v) in water (0.1% formic acid) over 10 min followed by 95% acetonitrile for 7 min at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.

EXAMPLE 2

Identification of Gene Clusters which Produce Compounds that Interact with a Target Protein

[0253] Thanks to next-generation sequencing, thousands of bacterial and fungal genomes have been sequenced. These species are known to be rich sources of secondary metabolites, for example penicillin rapamycin, and the statins. These secondary metabolites are small molecules, enzymatically synthesized by the products of one or more genes, often arrayed contiguously in a “biosynthetic gene cluster”.

[0254] This disclosure describes a method for identifying specific biosynthetic gene clusters, where the target of the secondary metabolite is a specific protein, and expressing that secondary metabolite in a host organism.

[0255] In certain cases, for example, when a secondary metabolite is being used as a weapon against other organisms, the secondary metabolite may also be toxic to the organism that produces it. In these cases, the producing organism may defend itself against self-harm in a number of ways: by pumping the secondary metabolite out of the cell; by enzymatically negating the secondary metabolite; or by producing an additional version of the target protein that is less sensitive or insensitive to the secondary metabolite.

[0256] In those cases where the organism produces an additional version of the target protein, this “protective” version of the gene is often colocalized with the biosynthetic gene cluster. Although different to the gene that produces the target protein, the protective version should maintain detectable homology to the target protein. This method takes advantage of this homology to identify those biosynthetic gene clusters that contain or are adjacent to a protective homolog of the target protein.

[0257] The input data required for this method are a list of biosynthetic gene clusters (e.g., polyketide synthase clusters, non-ribosomal peptide synthetase clusters) and a list of target proteins (i.e., proteins whose activity are to be modulated with secondary metabolites). The biosynthetic clusters may be identified based on the presence of certain protein domains, for example by the software program antiSMASH. The target proteins may be chosen based on their quantitative likelihood of being drug targets.

[0258] The output of this method is a score for each biosynthetic cluster, where clusters with higher scores represent those that are more likely to produce secondary metabolites targeting specific proteins of interest.

[0259] A score was constructed for each biosynthetic cluster based on the following factors: [0260] 1. the presence of one or more homologs of a target protein within or adjacent to the cluster, as determined by a homology search (e.g., using the tblastn algorithm, with a maximum score granted when one homolog is found) [0261] 2. the confidence in homology of the target to genes in a cluster (e.g., according to the tblastn algorithm, with an increasing score for lower e-values, and an upper bound threshold of 1e-30) [0262] 3. the fraction of the homologous gene that meets a certain threshold of identity (e.g., with an increasing score for more identity, and a lower bound threshold of 25% identity) [0263] 4. the total number of genes homologous to the target protein present in the entire genome of the organism (e.g., with a maximum score granted to cases with 2-4 homologs per genome) [0264] 5. the homology of the gene in or adjacent to the cluster to the target protein (e.g., using the blastx algorithm, with a maximum score granted when the gene in the biosynthetic gene cluster's closest homolog in the target protein's genome is the target protein itself) [0265] 6. the phylogenetic relationship of the target protein to the gene in the cluster (e.g., with an increasing score for homologs in the gene cluster that clade with the target protein, with confidence assigned by a bootstrap test or Bayesian inference of phylogeny, and a lower bound threshold defined as homologs in a phylogenetic context that appear in a clade with bootstrap value of 0.7 or Bayesian posterior probability of 0.8) [0266] 7. the expected number of homologs of the target in or adjacent to the biosynthetic cluster (e.g., with a greater score the lower the probability of a homolog of the target being present in or adjacent to a biosynthetic cluster of a certain size, given the number of total homologs in the genome, as determined by a permutation test) [0267] 8. the likelihood that the target protein is essential for viability, growth, or other cellular processes in the native environment, e.g., through evidence that deletion of homologs in related organisms (such as S. cerevisiae) render the organism inviable [0268] 9. synteny of the gene cluster with related species (e.g., with a maximum score if the entire cluster, including the target homolog, is conserved across several species) [0269] 10. the functional class of the target homolog (e.g., with a greater score if the gene is in a protein complex already known to be targeted by secondary metabolites) [0270] 11. the presence of specific promoters adjacent to the target homolog (e.g., with a greater score when there is a bidirectional promoter upstream of the target homolog and a biosynthetic gene) [0271] 12. the presence of specific regulatory elements in the biosynthetic gene cluster (e.g., with a greater score when there is a transcription factor binding site that is shared between target genes and/or biosynthetic genes in the cluster) [0272] 13. the presence of target homologs outside the cluster (including on other chromosomes) that are co-regulated with some or all of the genes in the biosynthetic cluster (e.g., with a greater score when biosynthetic gene clusters are co-regulated with putative target homologs) [0273] 14. the presence of protein- and DNA-sequence-derived features within the clusters that have successfully been shown to produce secondary metabolites (e.g., with a greater score when a gene in a cluster shares a domain—as determined by a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) with a cluster that has produced a secondary metabolite in one of the host organisms)

[0274] The above score was calibrated with reference to a set of “true positives” (i.e., cases where there are one or more known targets in or adjacent to a biosynthetic gene cluster that produces a small molecule known to target that protein)

[0275] This algorithm has been programmed in the Python programming language and has been applied to a set of more than 1,000 fungal genomes (and more than 10,000 biosynthetic gene clusters) to produce a list of potent ally relevant biosynthetic clusters.

[0276] Expressing Biosynthetic Clusters in a Host Organism

[0277] Given the highest scoring biosynthetic clusters as defined by the algorithm above, DNA was synthesized for each of the genes in those clusters. The DNA was cloned into a host organism (e.g., S. cerevisiae, also known as baker's yeast) for expression. The host organism synthesized the proteins from the gene cluster, which produces a secondary metabolite. Using HPLC and mass spectrometry, the secondary metabolite-expressing strain can be compared to an unmodified strain and affirm the presence of a new secondary metabolite.

[0278] This method has been successfully applied to the production of several secondary metabolites where there is evidence, based on the above method, for what the target protein of the secondary metabolite should be: [0279] An secondary metabolite derived from a biosynthetic gene cluster containing a homolog of the human gene SOS1; [0280] An secondary metabolite derived from a biosynthetic gene cluster containing a homolog of the human gene BRSK1; and [0281] An secondary metabolite derived from a biosynthetic gene cluster containing a homolog of the human gene DDX41.

[0282] A further example of a gene cluster which produces a product, for which there is evidence suggesting the target, is shown in FIG. 15A.

EXAMPLE 3

Prioritization of Novel Biosynthetic Gene Clusters by Phylogenetic Analysis

[0283] Two classes of fungal BGCs; those with either a polyketide synthase (PKS), or an UbiA-type sesquiterpene cyclase (UTC) as their core enzyme were chosen for analysis.

[0284] A computational pipeline was developed to prioritize PKS and UTC containing BGCs for heterologous expression. 581 sequenced fungal genomes were analyzed from the publicly available GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, as of July 2015). Each genome was analyzed for BGCs using antiSMASH2, identifying 3512 BGCs harboring an iterative type 1 PKS (iPKS) and 326 BGCs harboring a UTC homologue. Phylogenetic trees of each of these enzyme types were generated with identified characterized homologs from the MIBiG database20. BGCs were primarily selected from clades having few characterized members (FIG. 28A, FIG. 29A). The selected BGCs were found in the genomes of both ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. Basidiomycetes are, in general, more difficult to culture with fewer tools for genetic manipulation available as compared to ascomycetes. As a result, BGCs from basidiomycetes are under-studied, with few PRS-containing clusters deposited in MIBig, suggesting that these organisms represent a reservoir of BGCs capable of producing compounds with interesting new structures.

[0285] The coding sequences of all BGCs were ordered as synthetic constructs according to the default predicted gene coordinates (start, stop, and introns) as deposited in GenBank and clusters are described in Table 4.

[0286] Shown in FIG. 28A is a cladogram of the ketosynthase sequences of the 3512 iPKS sequences identified in this study. Of these, 28 were selected and the associated BGC containing the selected iPKS was analyzed using heterologous expression. Selected BGCs met the following criteria: (a) genetic structure was conserved across 3 or more species, (b) exhibited canonical domain architecture, and (c) contained an in-cis or proximal in-trans protein capable of releasing the polyketide from the carrier protein of the PKS (FIG. 30A). Seven of these clusters were derived from distinct clades comprised entirely of sequences from basidiomycetes (FIG. 28A).

[0287] The 28 selected PKS clusters were edited according to the methods described here to form expression vectors suitable for expression of the cluster coding sequences in yeast cells. The host cells were incubated and analyzed for the presence of novel chemical compounds by HPLC, as described in the methods section below. Of the PKS clusters selected from ascomycetes, 13 produce compounds. The most notable is the PKS1 cluster, which only contains an iPKS, a hydrolase, and the genes for three tailoring enzymes: a Cytochrome p450 (P450), a Flavin-dependent monooxygenase (FMO), and a Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR).

[0288] For the study of fungal UTCs, the phylogenetic tree shown in FIG. 29A was constructed based on the UbiA-type sesquiterpene cyclase, Fina-TC, from the fumagillin biosynthetic pathway. Moreover, the P450, Fina-P450, from the same pathway was shown to be a powerful enzyme catalyzing the 8 e oxidation of bergamotene to generate a highly oxygenated product. UTC BGCs spanning the entirety of the cladogram were selected in FIG. 29A where a cytochrome P450 was proximal to the UTC gene (FIG. 30B). Ultimately, 13 UTC BGCs from both ascomycetes and basidiomycetes were selected for analysis.

[0289] Screening of strains expressing these clusters by LC/HRMS revealed novel spectral features consistent with oxidized sesquiterpenoids being produced by five clusters (FIG. 29A). These results demonstrate that the membrane-bound UTCs represent a general class of terpene cyclase encoded by the genomes of diverse fungi. Several clusters and compounds produced are shown in FIGS. 28B, 28C, 28D, 28E and 28F.

[0290] Including both PKS and UTC BGCs, 24 of the 41 clusters produced measurable compounds, see Table 4 for a summary of the type, species of origin, and productivity of the clusters. Gene annotation errors introduced by incorrect intron prediction may have contributed to this failure rate. Manual inspection of one UTC (TC5) that initially had yielded no products suggested an incorrect intron prediction at the 5′ terminus of the gene. Correction of this intron led to a C-terminal protein sequence that aligned well with known functional UTCs. When tested by heterologous expression in a host cell, the version with the corrected intron produced a compound confirming that incorrect intron prediction is a failure mode in approaches that rely on publicly available gene annotations, (FIG. 29B). These results illustrate the importance of careful gene curation and the need for improved eukaryotic gene prediction, particularly with sequences from taxa with few well-studied members.

[0291] The results summarized in Table 4 demonstrate the utility of the methods herein for the selection of cryptic fungal BGCs. With the tools developed here, strains were built expressing 41 such clusters with 22 (54%) producing detectable levels of products not native to S. cerevisiae. While both basidiomycetes and ascomycetes are known to be prolific producers of bioactive compounds, to date, the bulk of research on the biosynthesis of fungal natural products has been undertaken in ascomycetes. In this study, heterologous expression allowed a large-scale survey of cryptic fungal BGCs from both ascomycetes and basidiomycetes, a less studied and more difficult to culture division of fungi with fewer tools for genetic manipulation. Using this platform, a panel of new products produced by the selected PKS and UTC clusters was identified.

[0292] Methods

[0293] antiSMASH2 software was applied to 581 public fungal genomes deposited in the Genbank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), to search for type 1 PKS and terpene cyclase gene clusters. This analysis identified 3,512 type 1 PKS gene clusters and 326 UbiA-like terpene gene clusters in 538 fungal genomes.

[0294] Phylogenetic analysis of both sequence sets was performed by building multiple sequence alignments of all protein sequences using MAFFT and building phylogenetic trees as shown in FIG. 28A and FIG. 29A using FastTree 2.

[0295] 28 of the 3,512 sequenced type 1 PKS gene clusters and 13 of the 326 terpene gene clusters were selected for expression in yeast as described above.

Construction and Culture of Production Strains:

[0296] Production strains were constructed by transforming plasmid DNA isolated out of E. coil (Qiagen miniprep 27106) into the appropriate expression host (JHY692 for PKS containing plasmids, JHY705 for all others) using the Frozen-EZ Yeast Transformation II kit (Zymo Research T2001) followed by plating on the appropriate SDC dropout media (CSM -Leu for PKS containing plasmids, CSM -Ura for all others). For BGCs encoded on at least two plasmids, three biological replicates for each haploid transformant were mated on YPD plates and incubated at 30° C. for 4-16 hrs prior to streaking for single colonies on CSM -Ura/-Leu and incubated at 30° C.

[0297] Small-scale cultures for analysis were begun by picking three biological replicates of each production strain along with empty vector controls into 500 μL of the appropriate SDC dropout medium in a 1 ml deep-well block and grown for approximately 24 hrs at 30° C. 50 μL of overnight culture was used to inoculate 500 μL of each of the production media to be tested in the experiment (generally both YPD and YPEG) in 1 ml deep well blocks. All blocks were covered with gas-permeable plate seals (Thermo Scientific AB-0718) and incubated at 30° C. for 72 hrs with shaking at 1000 rpm. Supernatants were clarified by centrifugation for 20 mins at 2800 g and a minimum of 100 μl of clarified supernatant was stored for future analysis. The remainder of the supernatant was discarded and the cell pellets extracted by mixing with 400 μof 1:1 ethyl acetate:acetone. Cell debris was precipitated by centrifugation for 20 mins at 2800 g and 200 μL of the extraction solvent pipetted to a fresh block and evaporated in a speedvac.

[0298] Prior to analysis, all supernatants were passed through a 0.2 μm filter plate while all cell pellet extracts were resuspended in 200 μl of HPLC grade methanol prior to filtering.

[0299] Analysis of Small Scale Cultures:

[0300] LC-MS analysis was conducted on an Agilent 6545 quantitative time-of-flight mass spectrometer interfaced to an Agilent 1290 HPLC system. The ion source for most analyses was an 69electrospray ionization source (dual-inlet Agilent Jet Stream or “dual AJS”). In some analyses, an Agiient Multimode Ion Source was also used for atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. The parameters used for both ionization sources are outlined in Table 5.

[0301] The HPLC column for all analyses was a 50 mm×2.1 mm Zorbax RRHD Eclipse C18 column with 1.8 μm beads (Agilent, 959757-902). No guard column was used.

[0302] Gradient conditions were isocratic at 95% A from 0 to 0.2 min, with a gradient from 95% A to 5% A from 0.2 to 4.2 minutes, followed by isocratic conditions at 5% A from 4.2 to 5.2 minutes, followed by a gradient from 5% A to 95% A from 5.2 to 5.2 minutes, followed by isocratic re-equilibration at 95% A from 5.2 to 6 minutes. For electrospray analyses. A was 0.1% v/v formic acid in water and B was 0.1% v/v formic acid in acetonitrile. For APCI analyses, B was substituted by 0.1% v/v formic acid in methanol.

[0303] Data analysis by untargeted metaboplomics was performed with xcms, using optimal parameters determined by IPO25. For PKS containing clusters, automated analyses were set to generate extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) for the top 50 spectral features as defined by both fold-change and p-value. These EICs were then manually inspected to identify the subset of automatically identified features that appear specific to the expressed BGC as defined by presence in each of three biological replicates of the production strain and absence from three biological replicates of a negative control strain (FIG. 31). EICs of all BGC specific features are illustrated in FIGS. 32-49,

EXAMPLE 4

Construction of Yeast Strains

[0304] In the current example, yeast strains are based on the BY4741/BY4742 background, which is in turn based on S288c (C. B. Brachmann, et al., 1998, cited supra). The strains were made in two stages: 1) creation of a core DHY set with restored sporulation and mitochondrial genome stability and 2) creation of JHY derivatives modified for other benefits, which may include protein production. All changes introduced in this study were confirmed by diagnostic PCR and sequencing.

[0305] A sporulation-restored strain set was built by crossing BY4710 (C. B. Brachmann, et al., 1998, cited supra) to a haploid derivative of YAD373 (A. M. Deutschbauer and R. W. Davis, Nat. Genet. 37:133-40, 2005), a BY-based diploid that contains three QTLs that restore sporulation: MKT1(30G), RME1(INS-308A), and TAO3(1493Q). A spore clone from the resulting diploid was repaired for HAP1, which encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor localized to mitochondria and the nucleus. HAP1 is important for mitochondrial genome stability (see J. R. Matoon, E. Caravajal, and D. Gurthrie Curr. Genet. 17:179-83, 1990) and likely also important for sporulation. S288c and derivatives contain a Ty1 insertion in the 3′ end of HAP1 that inactivates function. The transposon was excised using the Delitto Perfetto method (F. Storici and M. A. Resnick, Methods Enzymol. 409:329-45, 2006) and confirmed repaired HAP1 function based on transcription of a CYC1p-lacZ reporter (M. Gaisne, et al., Curr. Genet. 36:195-200, 1999). The sporulation-restored, HAP1-repaired strain and its auxotrophic and prototrophic derivatives were then used to create the DHY set of strains that were additionally restored for mitochondrial genome stability.

[0306] The above sporulation-restored strains were used to repair the poor mitochondrial genome stability known to be a problem with S288c and BY derivatives. Mitochondrial genome stability is likely to improve growth and ADH2p-like gene expression under conditions of respiration, and for reducing the frequency of petite cells (slow-growing, respiration-defective cells that cannot grow on non-fermentable carbon sources). For a detailed description of the “mito-repair” method, see construction of JHY650 (J. D. Smith, 2017, cited supra). Briefly, the 50:50 genome editing method was used to introduce the wild-type alleles of three genes shown to be important for mitochondrial genome stability by QTL analysis.sup.31. The repaired QTLs are: SAL1.sup.+ (repair of a frameshift), CAT5(91M) and MIP1(661T). Crosses with prototrophic and auxotrophic strains completed the DHY core set of about a dozen sporulation and mitochondrial genome stability restored strains that can be further modified as needed. DHY213 (see Table 3) is one such strain: it contains the seven desired changes described above, is otherwise congenic with BY4741, and was used in this study to create derivatives for the HEx platform (see Table 3).

[0307] Marker-free, seamless deletion of the complete PRB1 and PEP4 ORFs was performed using the 50:50 method (J. Horecka and R. W. Davis, 2014, cited supra). Integration of a 1609 bp ADH2p-npgA-ACS1t expression cassette on the chromosome was performed using a similar method used to integrate DNA segments with the REDI method (J. D. Smith, et al., 2017, cited supra), except that URA3, not FCY1, was used as the counter-selectable marker. For an integration site, an 1166 bp cluster of three transposon LTRs located centromere-distal to YBR209W on chromosome II was replaced (deletion of chrII 643438 to 644603). Two DNA segments were simultaneously inserted via homologous recombination at the integration site that had been cut with SceI to create double strand breaks. One inserted segment was ADH2p-npgA (1448 bp) PCR amplified from a BJ5464/npgA expression strain (npgA from A. nidulans) (K. K. M. Lee, N. A. Da Silva, and J. T. Kealey, Anal. Biochem., 394:75-80, 2009). The npgA 3′ end was repaired to wildtype using a reverse PCR primer that replaced the npgA intron included previously with the wildtype npgA 3′ sequence. To preclude recombination of the expression cassette with the native ADH2 locus, the 161 bp ACS1 terminator was used as the second DNA segment (not ADH2t) and PCR amplified from BY4741. The resulting strain (JHY692) was used in a similar fashion to replace only npgA with the CPR ORF (cytochrome P450 reductase, ATEG_05064 from A. terreus). Finally, a strain with both npgA and CPR expression cassettes (JHY702) was created by mating JHY692 and JHY705.

EXAMPLE 5

Determination of Chemical Structures

[0308] For compound isolation, large-scale fermentation was carried out with the strains and clusters of Example 3. The yeast strains were first struck out onto the appropriate SDC dropout agar plates and incubated for 48 hrs at 30° C. A colony was then inoculated into 40 mL SDC dropout medium and incubated at 28° C. for two days with shaking at 250 rpm. This seed culture was used to inoculate 4 L of YPD medium (1.5% Glucose) and cultured for 3 days at 28° C. and 250 rpm. Supernatants were then clarified by centrifugation and extracted with equal volume of ethyl acetate. Cell pellets were extracted with 1 L of acetone. For compounds containing carboxylic acid groups, the pH value of the supernatant was adjusted to 3 by adding HCl prior to extraction. The organic phases were combined and evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified by ISCO-CombiFlash® Rf 200 (Teledyne Isco, Inc) with a gradient of hexane and acetone. After analysis by LC-MS, the fractions containing the target compounds were combined and further purified by semi-preparative HPLC using C18 reverse-phase column. The purity of each compound was confirmed by LC-MS, and the structure was solved by NMR (FIG. 49-59).

[0309] All NMR spectra including .sup.1H, .sup.13C, COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY spectra were obtained on Bruker AV500 spectrometer with a 5 mm dual cryoprobe at the UCLA Molecular Instrumentation Center. The NMR solvents used for these experiments were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Summary of control and cryptic fungal BGCs examined in this study. Native Locus Cluster ID Type Genbank ID Start End Length Species of origin Division Productive? IDT Ctl Aspergillus Ascomycota Y tubingensis DHZ Ctl Hypomyces Ascomycota Y subiculosus PKS1 PKS KV441552 530394 546723 16329 Coniothyrium Ascomycota Y sporulosum PKS2 PKS KV441551 60641 83767 23126 Coniothyrium Ascomycota Y sporulosum PKS3 PKS Deposition 9892 Acremonium Ascomycota N pending Sp. KY4917 PKS4 PKS AM270992 578654 603367 24713 Aspergillus Ascomycota Y niger PKS5 PKS CP003009 8730831 8753560 22729 Thielavia Ascomycota N terrestris PKS6 PKS ABDF02000052 9685 28459 18774 Trichoderma Ascomycota Y virens PKS7 PKS JPJY01000093 2671 30026 27355 Pseudogymnoascus Ascomycota N pannorum PKS8 PKS JOWA01000110 1607857 1643205 35348 Scedosporium Ascomycota Y apiospermum PKS9 PKS KE384750 270098 292755 22657 Metarhizium Ascomycota N anisopliae PKS10 PKS KB445572 91380 115199 23819 Cochlioholus Ascomycota Y heterostrophus PKS11 PKS JPKB01001000 12749 37136 24387 Pseudogymnoascus Ascomycota N pannorum PKS12 PKS JPJU01000852 23274 38823 15549 Pseudogymnoascus Ascomycota N pannorum PKS13 PKS JPJR01000396 848 19416 18568 Pseudogymnoascus Ascomycota Y pannorum PKS14 PKS KN847553 300827 326489 25662 Verruconis Ascomycota Y gallopava PKS15 PKS AWSO01000045 179446 203577 24131 Moniliophthora Basidiomycota Y roreri PKS16 PKS JH687542 431482 465332 33850 Punctularia Basidiomycota Y strigosozonata PKS17 PKS KN839868 143119 188013 44894 Hydnomerulius Basidiomycota Y pinastri PKS18 PKS DS989828 1389449 1407499 18050 Arthroderma Ascomycota Y gypseum PKS19 PKS KB908593 409171 443069 33898 Setosphaeria Ascomycota N turcica PKS20 PKS GL532685 4724 17845 13121 Pyrenophora Ascomycota Y teres PKS21 PKS AMGW01000002 1294251 1322017 27766 Cladophialophora Ascomycota N yegresit PKS22 PKS DF933843 225991 254307 28316 Talaromyces Ascomycota Y cellulolyticus PKS23 PKS KE720645 48853 80314 31461 Endocarpon Ascomycota Y pusilium PKS24 PKS DF933834 523551 558018 34467 Talaromyces Ascomycota Y cellulolyticus PKS25 PKS AWSO01000633 5071 30440 25369 Moniliophthora Basidiomycota N roreri PKS26 PKS KN817529 130968 152240 21272 Hypholoma Basidiomycota N sublateritium PKS27 PKS KB445800 1362248 1403385 41137 Ceriporiopsis Basidiomycota N subvermispora PKS28 PKS AWSO01000632 8804 37857 29053 Moniliophthora Basidiomycota Y roreri TC1 UTC ABDF02000086 384012 368868 15144 Trichoderma Ascomycota Y Virens TC2 UTC ABDF02000083 37740 49247 11507 Trichoderma Ascomycota N Virens TC3 UTC FQ790293 97750 131296 33546 Botryotonia Ascomycota Y cinerea TC4 UTC JH717969 858521 869226 10705 Formitiporia Basidiomycota Y mediterranea TC5 UTC KI925459 2412992 2432365 19373 Heterobasidion Basidiomycota Y annosum TC6 UTC KB445798 581049 618823 37774 Ge/atoporia Basidiomycota N subvermispora TC7 UTC JH719450 83620 114270 30650 Dichomitus Basidiomycota N squalens TC8 UTC KL198014 1718438 1746540 28102 Pleurotus Basidiomycota N ostreatus TC9 UTC GL377319 205808 212935 7127 Schizophyllum Basidiomycota Y commune TC10 UTC JH687394 99692 114281 14589 Stereum Basidiomycota N hirsutum TC11 UTC JH687396 33983 48346 14363 Sternum Basidiomycota N hirsutum TC12 UTC JH719415 280135 300470 20335 Dichomitus Basidiomycota N squalens TC13 UTC JH795868 73132 97338 24206 Dacryopinax Basidiomycota N primogenitus Total 43 Productive 24

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Ion source parameters used in this study Ion source parameter Dual AJS MMI gas temperature 250° C. 350° C. drying gas 12 L/min 7.5 L/min nebulizer 10 psig 20 psig sheath gas temp. 400° C. — sheath gas flow 12 L/min — vaporizer — 250° C. capillary voltage 3500 V 1500 V (Vcap) nozzle voltage 1400 V — corona discharge — 4 μA fragmentor 100 V 120 V skimmer 50 V 50 V octopole 1 RF Vpp 750 V 750 V charging voltage — 1000 V

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Description of promoter sequences SEQ ID NO. Description 1 S. cerevisiae pADH2 2 S. cerevisiae pPCK1 3 S. cerevisiae pMLS1 4 S. cerevisiae pICL1 5 S. cerevisiae pYLR307C-A 6 S. cerevisiae pYGR067C 7 S. cerevisiae pIDP2 8 S. cerevisiae pADY2 9 S. cerevisiae pGAC1 10 S. cerevisiae pECM13 11 S. cerevisiae pFAT3 12 S. cerevisiae pPUT1 13 S. cerevisiae pNQM1 14 S. cerevisiae pSFC1 15 S. cerevisiae pJEN1 16 S. cerevisiae pSIP18 17 S. cerevisiae pAT02 18 S. cerevisiae pYIG1 19 S. cerevisiae pFBP1 20 S. cerevisiae PHO89 21 S. cerevisiae CAT2 22 S. cerevisiae CTA1 23 S. cerevisiae ICL2 24 S. cerevisiae ACS1 25 S. cerevisiae PDH1 26 S. cerevisiae REG2 27 S. cerevisiae CIT3 28 S. cerevisiae CFRC1 29 S. cerevisiae RGI2 30 S. cerevisiae PUT4 31 S. cerevisiae NCA3 32 S. cerevisiae STL1 33 S. cerevisiae ALP1 34 S. cerevisiae NDE2 35 S. cerevisiae QNQ1 36 S. paradoxus pADH2 37 S. kudriavzevii pADH2 38 S. bayanus pADH2 39 S. mikitae pADH2 40 S. castellii pADH2 41 S. paradoxus pPCK1 42 S. kudriavzevii pPCK1 43 S. bayanus pPCK1 44 S. paradoxus pMLS1 45 S. kudriavzevii pMLS1 46 S. bayanus pMLS1 47 S. paradoxus pICL1 48 S. kudriavzevii pICL1 49 S. bayanus pICL1 50 S. cerevisiae pTDH3 51 S. cerevisiae pTEF1 52 S. cerevisiae pFBA1 53 S. cerevisiae pPDC1 54 S. cerevisiae pTPI1 55 S. cerevisiae tADH2 56 S. cerevisiae tPGI1 57 S. cerevisiae tENO2 58 S. cerevisiae tTEF1 59 A. tubingensis GGPPS 60 A. tubingensis PT 61 A. tubingensis FMO 62 A. tubingensis Cyc 63 H. subiculosis hpm8 64 H. subiculosis hpm3 65 pCHIDT-2.1 66 pCHIDT-2c

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Description of gene sequences Cluster ID NO. SEQ ID NO. Description AFU3G 67 AFOC1 68 AFOC9 69 AFOC6 70 AFOC5 71 AFOC8 72 AFOC4 73 AFOC7 74 AFOC5N 75 AFOC2_PKS 76 AFOC3 Afu1g17740 77 A1OC1_TF 78 A1OC2_serine_hydrolase 79 A1OC3_aldose_epimerase 80 A1OC4_P450 81 Afu1g17740_2_PKS Ca157 82 Ca157_1_SDR 83 Ca157_2_Acyl_CoA_oxidase 84 Ca157_3_P450 85 Ca157_4_FMO 86 Ca157_5_PKS 87 Ca157_6_transferase 88 Ca157_7_PfpI 89 Ca157_8_hyp 90 Ca157_9_AB_hydrolase 91 Ca157_10_hyp Ca2032 92 Ca2032_1_3_GHMP_kinase 93 Ca2032_1_PKS 94 Ca2032_3_MT 95 Ca2032_4_P450 96 Ca2032_5_Ca_uniporter 97 Ca2032_6_GNAT_acetyltransferase KU14 98 KU14_SC3_4774_Cyclase 99 KU14_SC3_4776_P450 100 KU14_SC3_4773_polyprenyl_synthetase 101 KU14_SC3_4771_AK_reductase 102 KU14_SC3_4770_polyprenyl_synthetase 103 KU14_SC3_4768_AK_reductase 104 KU14_SC3_4772_DNA_repair 105 KU14_SC3_47775_QacA_drug_transporter 106 KU14_SC3_4769_Hyp KU18 107 KU18_SH9_7287_Cyclase 108 KU18_SH9_7288_P450 109 KU18_SH9_7289_P450 110 KU18_SH9_7286_P450 111 KU18_SH9_7285_DH KU26 112 KU26_ETS81063.1_metallo_hydrolase 113 KU26_ETS81064.1_hyp 114 KU26_ETS81065.1_esterase 115 KU26_ETS81066.1_PKS 116 KU26_ETS81067.1_hyp 117 KU26_ETS81068.1_SDR 118 KU26_ETS81069.1_SDR KU29 119 KU29_BO23_6166_ADH 120 KU29_BO23_6167_aminotransferase_3 121 KU29_BO23_6168_fasciclin 122 KU29_BO23_6169_hyp 123 KU29_BO23_6170_esterase 124 KU29_BO23_6171_glycoside_hydrolase 125 KU29_BO23_6172_hyp 126 KU29_BO23_6173_P450 127 KU29_BO23_6174_PKS KU40 128 KU40_KFA56048.1_NmrA_like 129 KU40_KFA56160.1_hyp 130 KU40_KFA56046.1_phytanoly-CoA_dioxygenase 131 KU40_KFA56190.1_NmrA_like 132 KU40_KFA56035.1_PKS 133 KU40_KFA56227.1_hyp 134 KU40_KFA56040.1_hyp 135 KU40_KFA56229.1_alkaline_serine_protease KU41 136 KU41_KIL85236.1_phenylalanine_specific_permease 137 KU41_KIL85237.1_aldehyde_DH 138 KU41_KIL85238.1_DH 139 KU41_KIL85239.1_hyp 140 KU41_KIL85240.1_hyp 141 KU41_KIL85241.1_hyp 142 KU41_KIL85242.1_1-amino_cyclopropane-1-carboxylate_oxidase 143 KU41_KIL85243.1_hyp 144 KU41_KIL85244.1_PKS 145 KU41_KIL85245.1_hyp 146 KU41_KIL85246.1_aromatic_dioxygenase 147 KU41_KIL85247.1_peptidase 148 KU41_KIL85248.1_kinase 149 KU41_KIL85249.1_metalloprotease 150 KU41_KIL85250.1_BLA 151 KU41_KIL85251.1_SDR 152 KU41_KIL85252.1_AK_reductase 153 KU41_KIL85253.1_metallopeptidase KU44 154 KU44_SL06_4460_TPR_repeat 155 KU44_SL06_4461_PKS 156 KU44_SL06_4462_aminotransferase_V 157 KU44_SL06_4463_MFS_transporter PKS1 158 CS100GC1_CDS1_PKS 159 CS100GC1_CDS2_serine_hydrolase 160 CS100GC1_CDS3_p450 161 CS100GC1_CDS4_short_chain_dehydrogenase 162 CS100GC1_CDS5_FAD_dehydrogenase PKS10 163 KU34_CH10_1770_epimerase_DH 164 KU34_CH10_1802_P450 165 KU34_CH10_1821_PKS 166 KU34_CH10_1888_metallo_bla 167 KU34_CH10_1909_hyp 168 KU34_CH10_1922_DUF1772 169 KU34_CH10_1937_NTF2_like 170 KU34_CH10_1951_NmrA_like 171 KU34_CH10_1975_SDR 172 KU34_CH10_2002_ABC_transporter PKS11 173 KU35_KFY73936.1_SDR 174 KU35_KFY73937.1_DUF_3425 175 KU35_KFY73938.1_Zn_finger 176 KU35_KFY73939.1_OMT 177 KU35_KFY73940.1_metallo_lactamase 178 KU35_KFY73941.1_PKS 179 KU35_KFY73942.1_acetyl_transferase 180 KU35_KFY73943.1_NmrA_like 181 KU35_KFY73944.1_FAD_linked_oxygenase PKS12 182 KU36_KFY14209.1_hyp 183 KU36_KFY14210.1_OMT 184 KU36_KFY14211.1_Metallo_BLA 185 KU36_KFY14212.1_PKS 186 KU36_KFY14213.1_FAD_linked_oxidase PKS13 187 KU37_KFY01907.1_DH 188 KU37_KFY01908.1_ABC_tranporter 189 KU37_KFY01909.1_PKS 190 KU37_KFY01910.1_MFS 191 KU37_KFY01911.1_PKc_like PKS14 192 KU38_KIW01747.1_metallo_hydrolase 193 KU38_KIW01748.1_halogenase 194 KU38_KIW01749.1_P450 195 KU38_KIW01750.1_cupin_like 196 KU38_KIW01751.1_OMT 197 KU38_KIW01752.1_MHR_TF 198 KU38_KIW01753.1_monoxygenase 199 KU38_KIW01754.1_PKS PKS15 200 KU39_ESK96608.1_monocarboxylate_permease 201 KU39_ESK96609.1_NAD_epimerase_DH 202 KU39_ESK96610.1_hyp 203 KU39_ESK96611.1_carbonyl_reductase 204 KU39_ESK96612.1_phenol_2_monoxygenase 205 KU39_ESK96613.1_PKS 206 KU39_ESK96614.1_SDR PKS16 207 NW_006767437_—_cystathionine_beta-synthase_CDS 208 NW_006767437_—_hypothetical_protein_1_CDS 209 NW_006767437_—_hypothetical_protein_2_CDS 210 NW_006767437_—_hypothetical_protein_3_CDS 211 NW_006767437_—_Pkinase-domain-containing_protein_CDS PKS17 212 KU43_KIJ60838.1 213 KU43_KIJ60843.1_P450 214 KU43_KIJ60845.1 215 KU43_KIJ60839.1_isoprenylcysteine_carboxyl_methyltransferase 216 KU43_KIJ60847.1_isoprenylcysteine_carboxyl_methyltransferase 217 KU43_KIJ60848.1_ABC_transporter 218 KU43_KIJ60844.1 219 KU43_KIJ60846.1_P450 220 KU43_KIJ60842.1 221 KU43_KIJ60840.1_ABC_transporter 222 KU43_KIJ60837.1_P450 223 KU43_KIJ60841.1_P450 224 KU43_KIJ60886.1_PKS PKS18 225 SU62_EFR04826.1_hypothetical_protein 226 SU62_EFR04827.1_fatty-acid-CoA_ligase 227 SU62_EFR04828.1_pks 228 SU62_EFR04829.1_esterase PKS19 229 SU64_EOA86426.1_YfhR_like 230 SU64_EOA86427.1_ER 231 SU64_EOA86425.1_FAD-hydroxylase 232 SU64_EOA86421.1_Drug_resistance_transporter 233 SU64_EOA86423.1_OMT 234 SU64_EOA86422.1_pks 235 SU64_EOA86424.1_esterase PKS2 236 CS163GC1_CDS1_serine_hydrolase 237 CS163GC1_CDS2_p450 238 CS163GC1_CDS3_PKS 239 CS163GC1_CDS4_short_chain_dehydrogenase 240 CS163GC1_CDS_FAD_dehydrogenase PKS20 241 SU65_EFQ95559.1_BLA 242 SU65_EFQ95560.1_PKS 243 SU65_EFQ95561.1_hyp 244 SU65_EFQ95562.1_KR PKS21 245 SU67_EXJ61964.1_drug_resistance_transporter 246 SU67_EXJ61965.1_scytalone_dehydratase 247 SU67_EXJ61966.1_versicolorin_reductase 248 SU67_EXJ61967.1_AMP_ligase 249 SU67_EXJ61968.1_hypothetical_protein 250 SU67_EXJ61969.1_FAD_monooxygenase 251 SU67_EXJ61970.1_pks 252 SU67_EXJ61971.1_metallo_BLA 253 SU67_EXJ61972.1_hyp 254 SU67_EXJ61973.1_SDR 255 SU67_EXJ61974.1_AifR_reg PKS22 256 SU68_GAM43180.1_beta-lactamase_family_protein 257 SU68_GAM43181.1_NAD-dependent_epimerase_dehydratase 258 SU68_GAM43183.1_oxidoreductase 259 SU68_GAM43185.1_benzoate_4-monooxygenase_cytochrome_P450 260 SU68_GAM43187.1_scytalone_dehydratase 261 SU68_GAM43176.1_riboflavin_biosynthesis_protein 262 SU68_GAM43177.1_sugar_transport_protein 263 SU68_GAM43178.1_short-chain_dehydrogenase 264 SU68_GAM43179.1_pks 265 SU68_GAM43182.1_halogenase 266 SU68_GAM43184.1_NAD-dependent_epimerase_dehydratase 267 SU68_GAM43186.1_SDR PKS23 268 SU70_ERF77218.1_SDR 269 SU70_ERF77219.1_Fungal_TF 270 SU70_ERF77220.1_p450 271 SU70_ERF77221.1_pks 272 SU70_ERF77222.1_DABB_superfamily 273 SU70_ERF77223.1_FAD_monooxygenase 274 SU70_ERF77224.1_alcohol_DH 275 SU70_ERF77225.1_OMT 276 SU70_ERF77226.1_alcohol_DH PKS24 277 SU71_GAM40295.1_sulfhydrolase 278 SU71_GAM40298.1_AMP_ligase 279 SU71_GAM40299.1_MT 280 SU71_GAM40301.1_carnosine_synthase 281 SU71_GAM40303.1_carnitine_acetyl-CoA_transferase 282 SU71_GAM40296.1_aminotransferase 283 SU71_GAM40297.1_ammonia_lyase 284 SU71_GAM40300.1_pks 285 SU71_GAM40302.1_ABC_tranporter PKS25 286 SU72_ESK88623.1_pks 287 SU72_ESK88624.1_carotenoid_cleavage_dioxygenase_1 288 SU72_ESK88625.1_long-chain-fatty-acid-ligase 289 SU72_ESK88626.1_amino_acid_permease PKS26 290 SU73_KN817529.1_pks 291 SU73_KN817529.1_hyp 292 SU73_KN817529.1_AMP_ligase 293 SU73_KN817529.1_8_amino_7_oxanoate_synthase PKS27 294 SU74_EMD35673.1_NAD_DH 295 SU74_EMD35676.1_sulfhydrylase 296 SU74_EMD35664.1_hyp 297 SU74_EMD35669.1_halogenase 298 SU74_EMD35663.1_AB_hydrolase 299 SU74_EMD35666.1_alcohol_DH 300 SU74_EMD35667.1_Drug_resistance_transporter 301 SU74_EMD35668.1_hyp 302 SU74_EMD35670.1_P450 303 SU74_EMD35665.1_hyp 304 SU74_EMD35671.1_pks 305 SU74_EMD35672.1_hyp 306 SU74_EMD35674.1_hyp 307 SU74_EMD35675.1_hyp PKS28 308 SU75_ESK88629.1_pks 309 SU75_ESK88630.1_drug_resistance_subfamily 310 SU75_ESK88631.1_hypothetical_protein 311 SU75_ESK88632.1_dead-box_protein_abstrakt 312 SU75_ESK88633.1_hyp 313 SU75_ESK88634.1_nadh-ubiquinone_oxidoreductase PKS3 314 AK_C24701GC76_CDS1_class_II_aminotransferase 315 AK_C24701GC76_CDS2_p450 316 AK_C24701GC76_CDS3_PKS 317 AK_C24701GC76_CDS4_ferric_chelate_reductase 318 AK_C24701GC76_CDS5_DUF4243 PKS4 319 KU27_AN22_1464_esterase 320 KU27_AN22_1465_PKS 321 KU27_AN22_1466_hyp 322 KU27_AN22_1467_A_TD 323 KU27_AN22_1468_hyp 324 KU27_AN22_1469_amino_oxidase PKS5 325 KU28_TT08_2721_AK_reductase 326 KU28_TT08_2722_ABC_transporter 327 KU28_TT08_2723_esterase 328 KU28_TT08_2724_PKS 329 KU28_TT08_2725_sugar_transport PKS6 330 KU30_TV43_5580_esterase 331 KU30_TV43_5581_P450 332 KU30_TV43_5582_PKS 333 KU30_TV43_5583_OMT 334 KU30_TV43_5584_P450 PKS7 335 KU31_KFY69032.1_P450 336 KU31_KFY69033.1_hyp 337 KU31_KFY69034.1_esterase 338 KU31_KFY69035.1_P450 339 KU31_KFY69036.1_PKS 340 KU31_KFY69037.1_glycoside_hydrolase 341 KU31_KFY69038.1_thymine_dioxygenase PKS8 342 KU32_KEZ41287.1_nucleotidyltransferase 343 KU32_KEZ41288.1_OMT 344 KU32_KEZ41289.1_AB_hydrolase 345 KU32_KEZ41290.1_mito_phos_carrier 346 KU32_KEZ41291.1_hyp 347 KU32_KEZ41292.1_crotonyl_CoA_reductase 348 KU32_KEZ41293.1_PKS 349 KU32_KEZ41294.1_Drug_resistance_transporter 350 KU32_KEZ41295.1_NADB_monoxygenase PKS9 351 KU33_KJK75348.1_alkaline_serine_hydrolase 352 KU33_KJK75349.1_LysM_containing_protein 353 KU33_KJK75350.1_PKS 354 KU33_KJK75351.1_drug_resistance_transporter 355 KU33_KJK75352.1_phytanoyl_CoA_dioxygenase 356 KU33_KJK75353.1_SDR 357 KU33_KJK75354.1_amino-7_oxonolate_synthase SU61 358 SU61_ENH82084.1_choline_oxidase 359 SU61_ENH82085.1_fungal_specific_transcription_factor 360 SU61_ENH82086.1_short-chain_dehydrogenase 361 SU61_ENH82087.1_hypothetical_protein 362 SU61_ENH82088.1_hypothetical_protein 363 SU61_ENH82089.1_pks 364 SU61_ENH82090.1_esterase 365 SU61_ENH82091.1_ABC_multidrug_transporter_mdr1 366 SU61_ENH82092.1_cytochrome_b5_type_b 367 SU61_ENH82093.1_sulfite_reductase_subunit_alpha SU63 368 SU63_KJZ74253.1_hyp_signalling_protein 369 SU63_KJZ74254.1_mtRNA_formyl_transferase 370 SU63_KJZ74255.1_esterase 371 SU63_KJZ74256.1_PKS 372 SU63_KJZ74257.1_choline_DH_halogenase SU66 373 SU66_EMF17384.1_ras-domain-containing_protein 374 SU66_EMF17385.1_phosphoinositide_phosphatase 375 SU66_EMF17387.1_hypothetical_protein 376 SU66_EMF17389.1_versicolorin_reductase 377 SU66_EMF17390.1_scytalone_dehydratase 378 SU66_EMF17386.1_pks 379 SU66_EMF17388.1_Metallo-hydrolase_oxidoreductase 380 SU66_EMF17391.1_StcQ-like_protein SU69 381 SU69_KFY04761.1_aldehyde_oxidase 382 SU69_KFY04762.1_SDR 383 SU69_KFY04763.1_hyp 384 SU69_KFY04764.1_reg_protein 385 SU69_KFY04765.1_OMT 386 SU69_KFY04766.1_metallo_BLA 387 SU69_KFY04767.1_pks 388 SU69_KFY04768.1_FAD-linked_oxidase TC1 389 Tv86_130_CDS 390 Tv86_132_CDS 391 Tv86_133_CDS 392 Tv86_134_CDS 393 Tv86_135_ORF 394 Tv86_136_CDS 395 Tv86_137_CDS TC10 396 KU19_SH16_10821_Cyclase 397 KU19_SH16_10820_P450 398 KU19_SH16_10822_P450 399 KU19_SH16_10823_AK_reductase 400 KU19_SH16_10819_QacA_MFS TC11 401 KU_20_SH18_11663_Cyclase 402 KU_20_SH18_11664_P450 403 KU_20_SH18_11665_P450 404 KU_20_SH18_11662_P450 405 KU_20_SH18_11660_NMT 406 KU_20_SH18_11661_MFS TC12 407 KU21_DS19_7112_Cyclase 408 KU21_DS19_7113_P450 409 KU21_DS19_7108_P450 410 KU21_DS19_7109_MT 411 KU21_DS19_7111_GMC_oxido 412 KU21_DS19_7114_AK_reductase 413 KU21_DS19_7110_Hyp TC13 414 KU22_DDJM14_6568_Cyclase 415 KU22_DDJM14_6570_P450 416 KU22_DDJM14_6567_OMT 417 KU22_DDJM14_6565_MT 418 KU22_DDJM14_6564_MT 419 KU22_DDJM14_6562_P450 420 KU22_DDJM14_6563_MT 421 KU22_DDJM14_6561_GST 422 KU22_DDJM14_6569_V-type_ATPase 423 KU22_DDJM14_6566_TF TC2 424 Tv83_13_CDS 425 Tv83_14_CDS 426 Tv83_15_CDS 427 Tv83_16_CDS TC3 428 BFT4_1_FAD_binding_domain_protein 429 BFT4_2_Aldo_keto_reductase_oxidoreductase 430 BFT4_3_cytochrome_P450 431 BFT4_4_UbiA_cyclase 432 BFT4_6_hyp_protein_4 433 BFT4_7_hyp_protein_5 434 BFT4_8_hyp_protein_6 435 BFT4_10_FAD_FMN_isoamyl_alcohol_oxidase 436 BFT4_11_hyp_protein_8 437 BFT4_14_hyp_protein_11 438 BFT4_15_glutathione_S_transferase 439 BFT4_16_D_isomer_specific_2_hydroxyacid_dehydrogenase TC4 440 KU11_FM3_3034_Cyclase 441 KU11_FM3_3033_P450 442 KU11_FM3_3032_P450 443 KU11_FM3_3031_FAD 444 KU11_FM3_3037_Hydrox 445 KU11_FM3_3027_AMP_SDR 446 KU11_FM3_3030_PHOS 447 KU11_FM3_3035_Hyp TC5 448 KU12_HI6_11661_Cyclase 449 KU12_HI6_11655_P450 450 KU12_HI6_11638_P450 451 KU12_HI6_11667_AMP_ligase 452 KU12_HI6_11646_monocarbox_MFS 453 KU12_HI6_11632_MFS TC6 454 KU13_CeS8_5906_Cyclase 455 KU13_CeS8_5905_P450 456 KU13_CeS8_5911_P450 457 KU13_CeS8_5904_choline_DH 458 KU13_CeS8_5910_halogenase 459 KU13_CeS8_5907_AMP_ligase 460 KU13_CeS8_5909_superoxide_dismutase 461 KU13_CeS8_5908_MFS 462 KU13_CeS8_5912_MFS TC7 463 KU15_DS54_10337_Cyclase 464 KU15_DS54_10336_P450 465 KU15_DS54_10340_P450 466 KU15_DS54_10341_P450 467 KU15_DS54_10338_polyprenyl_synthetase 468 KU15_DS54_10333_GMC_oxido 469 KU15_DS54_10334_GMC_oxido 470 KU15_DS54_10339_Hyp 471 KU15_DS54_10335_Hyp_transmembrane TC8 472 KU16_PO11_11845_Cyclase 473 KU16_PO11_11844_FAD_oxidase 474 KU16_PO11_11843_P450 475 KU16_PO11_11841_2_P450 476 KU16_PO11_11840_FAD_oxidase 477 KU16_PO11_11847_FAD_oxidase 478 KU16_PO11_11846_SDR 479 KU16_PO11_11848_AMP_ligase 480 KU16_PO11_11839_AMP_ligase TC9 481 KU17_SC18_16687_Cyclase 482 KU17_SC18_16686_P450 483 KU17_SC18_16688_SDR

[0310] While preferred embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described herein, those skilled in the art will understand that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the disclosure.