Plasmid combination, recombinant agrobacterium tumefaciens, and method for improving <i>Phytophthora </i>resistance of plants

Abstract

The present disclosure discloses an AtPPR1 gene (negative regulatory factor) for Phytophthora resistance and homologous genes thereof, involving an AtPPR1 gene and a protein encoded by the AtPPR1 gene. The AtPPR1 gene has a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO:6, and the protein encoded by the AtPPR1 gene has an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:7. A function of the AtPPR1 gene of the present disclosure to improve Phytophthora resistance of plants can be used for the selective breeding of Phytophthora-resistant varieties. As a new type of negative immunoregulatory factor in plants, AtPPR1 negatively regulates the resistance of plants to Phytophthora by interfering with downstream signal transduction of endogenous jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) and ROS signals in plants.

Claims

1. A method for improving Phytophthora resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana, potato, or Nicotiana benthamiana, comprising the following steps: constructing a pentatricopeptide repeat 1 (PPR1)-deficient mutant to reduce an expression level of a protein encoded by an endogenous PPR1 gene of the Arabidopsis thaliana, potato, or Nicotiana benthamiana, wherein, the endogenous protein encoded by the PPR1 gene has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 of the Arabidopsis thaliana, SEQ ID NO: 10 of the Nicotiana benthamiana, SEQ ID NO: 8 or SEQ ID NO: 9 of the potato.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, constructing the PPR1 deficient mutant comprises: constructing a Nicotiana benthamiana pentatricopeptide repeat 1 (NbPPR1)-deficient Nicotiana benthamiana through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS); or constructing defective potato through VIGS, wherein, an object of the gene silencing is a homologous gene of the PPR1 gene in the sequenced potato genome.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein, constructing the NbPPR1-deficient Nicotiana benthamiana through VIGS comprises the following steps: 1) Inserting an NbPPR1-specific fragment of SEQ ID NO: 1 into a tobacco rattle virus RNA2-based plasmid (pTRV2) to obtain a silencing vector; 2) Transforming a tobacco rattle virus RNA1-based plasmid (pTRV1) and the silencing vector respectively into Agrobacterium tumefaciens to obtain a first recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens and a second recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens; and 3) Transforming the first recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the second recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens into Nicotiana benthamiana for joint transient expression.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein, the first recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the second recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens are transformed into Nicotiana benthamiana at a final concentration of OD.sub.600=0.25.

5. The method according to claim 3, wherein, the step of transforming the first recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the second recombinant Agrobacterium tumefaciens into Nicotiana benthamiana for joint transient expression comprises an Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration method.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the protein sequence alignment of AtPPR1 (SEQ ID NO. 7) with NbPPR1 (SEQ ID NO. 10), StPPR1-1 (SEQ ID NO. 8), and StPPR1-2 (SEQ ID NO. 9) according to Example 2 of the present disclosure;

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the resistance of an AtPPR1-knockout mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana to P. parasitica according to Example 3 of the present disclosure;

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating the resistance of an AtPPR1-knockout mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana to Phytophthora capsici (P capsici) according to Example 3 of the present disclosure;

(4) FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the resistance of an AtPPR1-knockout mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana to Pseudomonas syringae (P. syringae) according to Example 3 of the present disclosure;

(5) FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating the result of enhancing the resistance to P. parasitica by silencing NbPPR1 in Nicotiana benthamiana according to Example 4 of the present disclosure;

(6) FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating the result of enhancing the resistance to P. infestans by silencing NbPPR1 in Nicotiana benthamiana according to Example 4 of the present disclosure; and

(7) FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating the growth phenotype of NbPPR1-silent plants according to Example 4 of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(8) In order to deepen the understanding of the present disclosure, the present disclosure will be described in further detail below in conjunction with examples, but these examples are only used to explain the present disclosure and do not constitute a limitation on the protection scope of the present disclosure.

Example 1

(9) This example provided the cloning of the AtPPR1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana, including the following steps:

(10) Step 1: Preparation of plant materials: wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 was prepared (available through public channels). Extraction of RNA: RNA was extracted with an RNA extraction kit (OMGA, Lot #: R6827-01), the integrity of RNA was identified by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the purity and concentration of RNA were then determined on a spectrophotometer.

(11) Step 2: Gene cloning: A reverse transcription kit (TaKaRa, Lot #: AHE3187A) was used to obtain cDNA of Col-0. The upstream and downstream primers AtPPR1-F/R were designed according to a full-length coding sequence of AtPPR1 (At4G02820) provided in the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) website, and the cDNA was used as a template for amplification. PCR products were subjected to enzyme digestion, ligation, and bacterial liquid PCR verification and then used to construct vectors pKannibal-AtPPR1, which were sent for sequencing. Sequencing results were aligned with a published sequence, and correct plasmids were used for subsequent experiments.

(12) Primer Sequences:

(13) AtPPR1-F: CCGCTCGAGATGAATAAAAACATGTTGGTTCGCT, shown in SEQ ID NO. 2; and

(14) AtPPR1-R: GCTCTAGACTAAGAAATGGTGGACGAGATTTCA, shown in SEQ ID NO. 3.

Example 2

(15) This example provided the sequence information and homology analysis for the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPPR1 gene. A full-length CDS sequence of the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPPR1 gene was 1,599 bp, and a detailed sequence could be seen in SEQ ID NO: 6. An amino acid sequence of the gene had a total of 532 amino acids, and a detailed sequence could be seen in SEQ ID NO: 7.

(16) The amino acid sequence of the protein encoded by the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPPR1 gene was subjected to homology search with the BLAST program, and results showed that one homologous gene NbPPR1 was found in Nicotiana benthamiana. Moreover, two homologous genes for AtPPR1 were also found in research of a potato genome. With an amino acid sequence similarity of more than 50%, the 3 homologous genes were inferred to have the same function as AtPPR1.

(17) FIG. 1 shows the alignment results of an amino acid sequence encoded by the Arabidopsis thaliana AtPPR1 gene with the amino acid sequences encoded by the three homologous genes in Nicotiana benthamiana and potato.

Example 3

(18) This example showed that a T-DNA-inserted mutant of AtPPR1 Arabidopsis thaliana (purchased from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC)) exhibited the resistance to P. parasitica, P. capsici, and P. syringae, specifically including the following steps:

(19) Step 1: Specific primers (qAtPPR1-F: AAAATGAATGATGCGGAGTATCTC, shown in SEQ ID NO. 4; and qAtPPR1-R: TAGAATAGCTCGGGTTTATCCCT, shown in SEQ ID NO. 5) were first designed to detect the expression of AtPPR1 in the mutant.

(20) Step 2: About 0.1 g of an Arabidopsis thaliana sample was collected to extract RNA, which was reverse-transcribed into cDNA; then specific primers were designed; and the expression of AtPPR1 was detected using the real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR technology.

(21) Step 3: AtPPR1 mutant Arabidopsis thaliana leaves at a seedling age of 4 to 5 weeks were collected, and wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 was adopted as a control. The leaves were scratched and inoculated with about 2,000 GFP-labeled zoospores of P. parasitica, and then cultivated in a 23 C. incubator in the dark for about 48 h. Fluorescence observation and disease degree evaluation were conducted.

(22) Step 4: P. capsici was inoculated at a zoospore number adjusted to about 800 and cultivated under conditions similar to that of P. parasitica. About 40 h after cultivation, a lesion diameter was observed and measured.

(23) Step 5: A stored Pst DC3000 bacterial glycerol stock was streaked on an LB plate with corresponding antibiotics for activation, and then cultivated overnight at 28 C. in the dark.

(24) Step 6: Single colonies were picked and inoculated into 3 mL of LB liquid medium with antibiotics, and cultivated at 28 C. with 220 rpm until OD.sub.600=1; then bacteria were collected and resuspended in dH.sub.2O, and OD.sub.600 was adjusted to 0.1; the resulting solution was diluted 1,000 times and then injected into Arabidopsis thaliana leaves; and after the injection and three days after the inoculation, samples were collected at the same amount, then ground, and coated to analyze the reproduction of P. syringae.

(25) Results are shown in FIG. 2, FIG. 3, and FIG. 4. In FIG. 2, the left panel shows the observation results of lesions about 2 days after inoculation with the zoospores of P. parasitica, and the right panel shows the evaluation results of disease degree. In FIG. 3, the left panel shows the observation results of lesions about 46 h after inoculation with the zoospores of P. parasitica, and the right panel shows the evaluation results of lesion diameter. In FIG. 4, the left panel shows that the cfu value of P. syringae in the atppr1-1 mutant is significantly smaller than that in the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana three days after the inoculation, and the right panel shows the expression levels of AtPPR1 in the two mutants detected by the quantitative PCR technique.

Example 4

(26) This example showed that silencing NbPPR1 in Nicotiana benthamiana could improve the resistance to P. parasitica and P. infestans, including the following steps:

(27) Step 1: An NbPPR1-specific fragment of about 300 bp was selected and inserted at a site between EcoR1 and Xho 1 to construct a pTRV2-NbPPR1 silencing vector; and the NbPPR1-specific fragment had a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO. 1, specifically:

(28) TABLE-US-00001 AGCTGAGGCTTTGATGGAAAAAATGTCCGAATGTGGTTTCTTGAAATGCC CTCTTCCTTATAATCACATGCTATCCTTATACATATCCCAAGGGCAACTA GAGAAGGTTCCCCGCCTGATTCAGGAATTGAAGAAAAATAGCTCTCCTGA TATTGTCACATACAACCTGGAGTTGGCAGTTTGTGCATCCCAGAATGATG TTGAAGCTGCAGAGAAAACATTCGTTGAGCTAAAGAAGGCAAAATTGGAT CCTGATTGGATAACGTTTAGCACATTAACAAACATCTATATTAAAAGCTC ACTTCAGGATAAAGCAAAGTC.

(29) Step 2: pTRV1, pTRV2-GFP, and a pTRV2 vector inserted with a target fragment were electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration method was used to achieve the joint transient expression of pTRV1-transformed Agrobacterium tumefaciens and pTRV-NbPPR1-transformed Agrobacterium tumefaciens on Nicotiana benthamiana, and generally, the Nicotiana benthamiana was injected at a final concentration of OD.sub.600=0.25.

(30) Step 3: A silenced phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene was adopted as a positive control, and GFP was adopted as a negative control. When the positive control exhibited a significant silencing effect (2 to 3 weeks later), leaves of the experimental group were selected and inoculated with pathogens for analysis, and specific primers were designed to detect the expression of PPR1 in silent plants.

(31) Step 4: About 0.1 g of a Nicotiana benthamiana sample was collected to extract RNA, which was reverse-transcribed into cDNA; then specific primers were designed; and the expression of PPR1 was detected using the real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR technology.

(32) Step 5: NbPPR1-silenced Nicotiana benthamiana leaves were collected, and GFP-silenced plants were adopted as a control. The leaves were scratched and inoculated with about 2,000 GFP-labeled zoospores of P. parasitica, and then cultivated in a 23 C. incubator in the dark for about 40 h. Then a lesion diameter was observed and measured.

(33) Step 6: After fresh P. infestans was cultivated for about 10 days, about 5 mL of sterile water was added to the culture to stimulate zoospores at 4 C. for about 1 h to 2 h. After a large number of zoospores were released, about 1,500 zoospores were inoculated at each inoculation site. A lesion diameter was observed and measured after the leaves were cultivated at 16 C. for 5 days. 10 days after the inoculation, leaves were collected, and produced sporangia were counted.

(34) Step 7: The growth and flowering of silent plants were continuously observed 3 to 6 weeks after the injection.

(35) Results are shown in FIG. 5, FIG. 6, and FIG. 7. In FIG. 5, the left panel shows the observation results of lesions about 46 h after inoculation with the zoospores of P. parasitica, and the right panel shows the measurement results of lesion diameter. In FIG. 6, the left panel shows the observation results of lesions about 5 days after inoculation with the zoospores of P. infestans, the middle panel shows the measurement results of lesion diameter, and the right panel shows the production of sporangia 10 days after inoculation with P. infestans.

(36) The AtPPR1 gene of the present disclosure is cloned for the first time as a negative immunoregulatory factor that affects plant ROS and hormone signal transduction. An AtPPR1 gene-overexpressed transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana material is constructed through genetic engineering, and the in vitro leaf inoculation experiment proves that AtPPR1-overexpressed Arabidopsis thaliana is more susceptible to infection of P. parasitica. An AtPPR1 gene-deficient mutant is constructed through genetic engineering, and it is found that the mutant can significantly increase the resistance to pathogens such as Phytophthora and P. syringae. An NbPPR1-deficient Nicotiana benthamiana plant material is obtained through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), and it is proved by the in vitro leaf inoculation experiment that this material can enhance the resistance to P. parasitica and P. infestans. Experimental results prove that the function of the AtPPR1 gene to improve Phytophthora resistance of plants can be used for the selective breeding of Phytophthora-resistant varieties.

(37) In addition, it is found from the analysis by the real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR technology that the AtPPR1 gene interferes with the signaling pathways of endogenous SA and JA in plants, and it is also found from ROS determination that AtPPR1-deficient plants show stronger ROS. Results show that AtPPR1, as a new negative immunoregulatory factor in plants, negatively regulates the resistance of plants to Phytophthora by interfering with downstream signal transduction of endogenous JA and SA and ROS signals in plants.

(38) The above shows and describes the basic principles, main features, and advantages of the present disclosure. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that, the present disclosure is not limited by the above examples, and the above examples and the description only illustrate the principle of the present disclosure. Various changes and modifications may be made to the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure, and such changes and modifications all fall within the claimed scope of the present disclosure. The protection scope of the present disclosure is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.