DRUG FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES CAUSED BY BACTERIA

Abstract

The invention relates to chemistry and pharmacology, specifically to a synthetic biologically active substance -7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 acetate or succinate formula 1:1

##STR00001## Where X.sup.−═CH.sub.3COO.sup.− or HOOCCH.sub.2CH.sub.2COO.sup.−, as well as its tautomeric, hydrated forms, solvate, complex compounds, adducts and salt forms, possessing antimicrobial activity, and the ability to penetrate bacterial biofilms. The compound is intended for the treatment of bacterial infections of the oropharynx, skin, and mucous membranes, urinary system, implants, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract. osteomyelitis, sepsis, nosocomial and wound infections.

Claims

1. Compound 7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 of formula 1: ##STR00005## Where X selected from the group consisting of =CH3COO− and HOOCCH2CH2COO−.

2. The compound of claim 1 with antimicrobial activity or its tautomeric, hydrated forms, solvates, complexes and adducts.

3. The compound of claim 1, containing salt forms

4. The compound of claim 2, for the treatment of diseases caused by bacteria.

5. The compound of claim 2, for the treatment of diseases caused by antibiotic-resistant strains of MRSA, VISA and VRSA.

6. Pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of diseases caused by bacterial infections, containing an effective amount of the compound according to claim 1 or its tautomeric, hydrated form, salt, solvate, complex compound, adduct, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.

7. A pharmaceutical composition according to claim 6, containing an effective amount of a compound according to Formula 1 in combination with at least one other antimicrobial drug.

8. A method for treating bacterial infections in a subject by administering a compound 7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 of formula 1: ##STR00006## where X is selected from the group consisting of =CH3COO− and HOOCCH2CH2COO−, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of formula 1 or its tautomeric, hydrated form, salt, solvate, complex compound, adduct, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent.

9. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8 wherein the compound is used to suppress the viability of bacteria that are part of biofilms.

10. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8 wherein, the compound is used in compositions with at least one other antimicrobial drug for the treatment of diseases caused by antibiotic-resistant strains of MRSA, VISA, VRSA.

11. (canceled)

12. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8 wherein, disease is a disease caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Escherichia coli.

13. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8, wherein, characterized in that the specified disease is selected from the group including bacterial infections of the oropharynx, skin, mucous membranes, urinary system, implants, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, osteomyelitis, sepsis, nosocomial and wound infections.

14. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8, wherein, the compound is administered at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg to 2000 mg/kg.

15. The method for treating bacterial infections of claim 8, wherein, said compound or pharmaceutical composition is administered to a subject enterally.

Description

PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention

[0028] The claimed substance is synthesized in accordance with scheme 1.

##STR00004##

[0029] Where X.sup.−═CH.sub.3COO.sup.− or HOOCCH.sub.2CH.sub.2COO.sup.−

[0030] The synthesis of the claimed substance 1 according to scheme 1 is carried out in one stage.

[0031] The essence of the invention is illustrated by the following examples of the synthesis of the claimed substance and its characteristics, experiments to study the biological properties and tables of the results of experiments to determine the biological properties of the claimed substance, where:

[0032] example 1—a specific variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance (Compound 1a);

[0033] example 2—a specific variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance (Compound 1a);

[0034] example 3—a specific variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance (Compound 1b);

[0035] example 4—determination of the effectiveness of the test compounds on firmicutes bacteria;

[0036] example 5—determination of the effectiveness of the test compounds on gracilicutes and wall-less bacteria;

[0037] example 6—the effect of the claimed compounds on bacterial strains with multiple resistance to antibiotics;

[0038] example 7—the effect of the claimed compound on bacteria that are part of biofilms;

[0039] example 8—study of chemotherapeutic efficacy.

[0040] example 9—clinical data on the effectiveness of the claimed compound in the treatment of tonsillitis caused by staphylococcus or streptococcus;

[0041] example 10—use of the compound in the form of a composition with other antimicrobials.

[0042] Example 1. A variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance is the preparation of 7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 acetate (Compound 1a).

[0043] 0.1 mol (12.8 g) of barbituric acid (2) was dissolved with heating in 270 ml of glacial acetic acid. 0.105 mol (29.4 g) of 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (3) was added to this solution with stirring, and the resulting reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 40 h. The resulting crystalline product was filtered off, washed with cold acetic acid, then with ether, and dried on air. 30.7 g of product 1 (Compound 1a) was obtained in the form of yellow needle-like crystals with mp 255-260 oC (decomp.). Yield 71% of theory.

[0044] Elemental analysis data. Found, %: C, 36.31; H, 2.01; Br, 36.87; N, 6.44. C13H8Br2N205. Calculated, %: C, 36.14; H, 1.97; Br, 36.99; N, 6.48.

[0045] NMR spectrum in DMSO-d6. Chemical shift, ppm (J, Hz): 7.75 d (1H, J 8.2, ArH), 7.92 d (1H, J 8.2, ArH), 8.29 s (1H, ═CH), 11.18 s (1H, NH), 11.44 (1H, NH).

[0046] mass spectrum. MH+(I, %) 391 (24), 373 (100).

[0047] Example 2. A variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance is the preparation of 7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 acetate (Compound 1a).

[0048] 0.1 mol (12.8 g) of barbituric acid (2) was dissolved with heating in 300 ml of glacial acetic acid. To this solution was added with stirring 0.11 mol (30.8 g) of 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (3) and then 0.2 mol (20.4 g) of acetic anhydride. The resulting reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 24 h. The resulting crystalline product was filtered off, washed with cold acetic acid, then with ether, and dried in air. 36.6 g of product 1 were obtained in the form of yellow needle-shaped crystals with mp 255-260 o C (with decomposition). Yield 80% of theoretical. The characteristics of the product (Compound 1a) are the same as in Example 1.

[0049] Example 3. A variant of the synthesis of the claimed substance is the preparation of 7,9-dibromo-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrochromeno[2,3-d]-pyrimidinium-10 succinate (Compound 1b).

[0050] 0.1 mol (12.8 g) of barbituric acid (2) was dissolved with heating in 300 ml of glacial acetic acid. To this solution was added with stirring 0.105 mol (29.4 g) of 3,5-dibromo-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (3) and then 0.2 mol (20.4 g) of succinic anhydride. The resulting reaction mixture was left at room temperature for 24 h. The resulting crystalline product was filtered off, washed with ether, and dried in air. 37.8 g of product 1b were obtained in the form of yellow needle-shaped crystals with mp 250-253 o C (with decomposition). Yield 73% of theoretical.

[0051] Elemental analysis data Compounds 1b. Found, %: C, 36.39; H, 2.09; Br, 32.54; N, 5.66. C15H10Br2N207. Calculated, %: C, 36.76; H, 2.06; Br, 32.61; N, 5.72.

[0052] Example 4 Determination of the effectiveness of the test compounds against firmicutes bacteria.

[0053] Determination of the antimicrobial activity of substances was carried out on dense and liquid nutrient media. To assess the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the serial dilution method was used, according to the recommendations of CLSI (Clinical Laboratories and Standards Institute, formerly National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) (Clinical Laboratories and Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard—Seventh Edition Document M7-A7 CLSI, Wayne, Pa., 2006; Clinical Laboratories and Standards Institute).

[0054] The assessment of the antimicrobial activity of substances against firmicute bacteria was performed on fresh clinical isolates of strains of Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus mitis, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, Corynebacterium ulcerans, Micrococcus luteus.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Determination of the effectiveness of the test compounds (Compounds 1a and 1b) on firmicutes bacteria MIC (μg/ml) Compounds S. prepared according aureus S S. B. B. L. C. M. to the invention ATCC 29213 pyogenes mitis subtilis cereus monocytogenes ulcerans lutteus 1a 0.5 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 1b 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

[0055] As shown by the tests, Compound 1a and its salt have a high antimicrobial activity against firmicutes bacteria.

[0056] Example 5. Determination of the effectiveness of the test compounds on gracilicutes and wall-less bacteria.

[0057] The study of the effect on strains was performed on fresh clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides, Ureaplasma urealyticum strains, as well as on the Escherichia coli ATCC29592 strain.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Determination of the effectiveness of the action of the tested Compounds 1a and 1b on gracilicutes and wall-less bacteria MIC (μg/ml) Compound E. coli H. influenzae N. meningitides U. urealyticum 1a 20.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 1b 30.0 20.0 20.0 20.0

[0058] As can be seen from the table, the claimed Compounds 1a and 1b have antimicrobial activity against some gracilicutes and wall-less bacteria.

[0059] Example 6. The effect of the claimed compounds on bacterial strains with multiple resistance to antibiotics.

[0060] The study of the effect of Compound 1a on strains with multiple resistance to existing antibiotics was performed on fresh clinical isolates of strains: S.aureus VT-V-18, S.aureus VT-E-25 S.aureus VT-A-199 and S.aureus VT-P-82, as well as S.aureus strain American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.) and strains S.aureus SA77 and S.aureus SA85,

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Effects of Compound 1a on various strains of S. aureus. MIC (μg/ml) Strains MRSA Strains VRSA Strain MSSA Compound Resistance VT-V-18 VT-E-25 VT-A-199 VT-P-82 SA77 SA85 ATCC 29213 1a Not detected 0.5 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 (ND)

[0061] Substance 1a is highly active at concentrations from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg. The efficacy of Compound 1a did not differ between methicillin/vancomycin-resistant and susceptible strains.

[0062] Example 7. The action of the claimed Compound on bacteria that are part of biofilms.

[0063] S. aureus ANCC29213 bacteria were grown in a 24-well plateau in LB medium for 24 hours at 37° C. After that, Compound 1a and lincomycin (8 wells for each preparation and control without preparations) were added to the wells at final concentrations of 10 μg/ml and incubated for 24 hours at 37° C. After incubation, the medium was removed, the biofilms were washed with a sterile solution of isotonic sodium chloride, the biofilms were removed from the bottom of the wells, resuspended in isotonic sodium chloride solution, and the number of colony forming units (CFU) was determined by the method of serial dilutions.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Survival of bacteria in biofilms Compound Number of CFU Control 3.0 ± 1.0 × 10.sup.8 Lincomycin 2.0 ± 1.0 × 10.sup.8 Compound 1a 4.0 ± 1.0 × 10.sup.5

[0064] Substance 1a is highly active at concentrations from 0.5 to 2.0 mg/kg. The efficacy of Compound 1a did not differ between methicillin/vancomycin-resistant and susceptible strains.

[0065] Example 7. The action of the claimed Compound on bacteria that are part of biofilms. The data obtained show that Compound 1a penetrates into bacterial biofilms and reduces the number of bacteria capable of growth in them by 1000 times. The reference drug does not penetrate into bacterial biofilms and does not change the number of CFUs in them.

Example 8 Chemotherapeutic efficacy study.

[0066] To study the chemotherapeutic efficacy, a model of acute generalized infection in small animals was used. C57BL6 mice were intraperitoneally infected with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 38591 at a dose of 1×108 microbial cells. The infectious dose was established in preliminary studies. Mice infected with the same dose of microbial culture but not treated served as controls.

[0067] The preparations were dissolved in an isotonic sodium chloride solution and substance 1a or Lincomycin was administered. 2 hours after infection, the drugs were administered [0068] orally daily at doses of 10 to 100 mg/kg, 2 times a day.
The death of mice was taken into account daily for 7 days.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Evaluation of the effect of Compound 1a in acute generalized infection in small animals infected with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 38591* Dose Number Mice death (days) (mg/kg) of mice 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Infection with Staphylococcus aureus 100 10 80 10 50 10 20 10 1 1 2 10 10 1 1 2 1 Control 10 9 1 *Averaged data from 3 independent experiments.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Evaluation of the effect of Lincomycin in acute generalized infection in small animals infected with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 38591* Dose Number Mices death (days) (mg/kg) of mice 1 2 3 4 1 2 7 Infection with Staphylococcus aureus 100 10 80 10 50 10 1 1 2 20 10 1 1 3 10 10 2 1 2 1 Control 10 8 2

[0069] The results obtained indicate that the Compound according to the invention is highly effective in the treatment of diseases caused by staphylococcus, which in relation to human diseases means such diseases as inflammatory diseases of the oropharynx, including tonsillitis, purulent-inflammatory diseases of the skin and mucous membranes, cystitis, implant infections, osteomyelitis and sepsis, as well as pneumonia, and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. The model used is also a reproduction of nosocomial infections resulting from diagnostic and surgical interventions.

[0070] Example 9. Clinical data on the effectiveness of the claimed compound in the treatment of tonsillitis caused by staphylococcus or streptococcus.

[0071] This pathology was chosen by us as one of the above lists to confirm the effectiveness and practical applicability of the claimed compound. The study was performed on two groups of patients, totaling 138 people, who received the drug enterally twice a day at doses from 500 mg to 2000 mg.

[0072] The compound was administered as a pharmaceutical composition containing Compound 1a in acetate form in an isotonic solution of a pharmaceutically acceptable sodium chloride carrier.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 The frequency of eradication of the pathogen in the bacteriological study of the material from the lacunae of the palatine tonsil in the treatment of tonsillitis. Eradication Compound 1a Phenoxymethylpenicillin Pathogen/ Number of Number of Day patients % patients % S. aureus 0 4 63 85.14% 3 4.11% P < 0.001 8 68 91.89% 7 9.59% P < 0.001 14  70 94.59% 10 13.70% P < 0.001 S. pyogenes 4 67 94.37% 7 10.14% P < 0.001 8 68 95.77% 8 11.59% P < 0.001 14  68 95.77% 9 13.04% P < 0.001

[0073] Thus, the effect of the claimed compound on the eradication of the pathogen is statistically significantly higher than at Phenoxymethylpenicillin, and the effect develops already on the 4th day of treatment.

[0074] The results obtained indicate that in the group of patients with tonsillitis, which is selected from the list of diseases of the possible use of the claimed compound, a high clinical efficacy of the claimed agent was registered, significantly exceeding that of the reference drug.

[0075] Example 10 Use of the Compound as a Composition with Other Antimicrobials.

[0076] The claimed compound can be used in the form of a composition with other antimicrobial drugs, and in this case it is possible to achieve a total antibacterial effect that is superior to that which can be obtained with the independent use of these drugs.

[0077] We used a strain of H. influenzae grown on a liquid nutrient medium. The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined by the method of serial dilutions.

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1a and its combinations with various antimicrobials in relation to H. influenzae. Compound MIC (μg /ml) Compound 1a 10.0 Tetracycline 2.0 Levofloxacin 0.05 Co-trimoxazole 1.0 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 2.0 1a + Tetracycline 3.0 + 0.53 1a + Levofloxacin 3.0 + 0.01 1a + Co-trimoxazole 3.0 + 0.5  1a + Amoxicillin/clavulanate 3.0 + 0.05

[0078] The data obtained indicate that combinations of Compound 1a and an antibiotic taken in an amount less than its individual MIC (subinhibitory concentration) provide inhibition of growth of the test microbe.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

[0079] Known materials and equipment are used to implement the invention, which, according to the applicant, determines the compliance of the invention with the criterion “Industrial applicability” (IA).