GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION AIDED DEVELOPER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR

Abstract

Disclosed are a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer and a preparation method therefor. The aided developer is mainly composed of a thickener, an osmotic pressure regulator, a solid contrast, a defoamer and a flavoring agent, wherein a density of the solid contrast is the same as that of aided developer liquid. The present disclosure adopts the solid contrast with a special particle size, making a distribution area present a more obvious homogeneous high echo after the aided developer reaches the stomach and intestine, and a good aided developing effect is achieved.

Claims

1. A gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer, prepared by following components in parts by weight: 2-4 parts of a thickener, which is one or more of Poloxamer 407, Poloxamer 338, Poloxamer 237 and Poloxamer 188; 2-4 parts of an osmotic pressure regulator; 1.5-2.5 parts of a solid contrast; 0.02-0.04 parts of a defoamer; 0.03-0.05 parts of a flavoring agent; 0.03-0.05 parts of a preservative, which is deoxidized sodium acetate; and 89.36-94.42 parts of pure water, wherein a density of the solid contrast is the same as that of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer, wherein the solid contrast are silica particles modified by a biocompatible polymer, the biocompatible polymer is one or more of polyethylene glycol, branched polyethylene glycol, chitosan, alginic acid, hyaluronic acid and polysiloxane, and the silica particles have different particle sizes as follows: the silica particles with particle sizes of 75-85 meshes, 85-95 meshes, 95-105 meshes and 105-120 meshes are mixed in a mass ratio of (60-65):(15-20):(5-10):(5-20).

2. The gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 1, wherein the osmotic pressure regulator is at least one of xylitol and mannitol.

3. The gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 1, wherein a method for modifying the silica particles with the biocompatible polymer is one or more of a sol-gel method, a one-step post-synthesis method, a two-step post-synthesis method, and a site selection post-synthesis method.

4. The gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 1, wherein the defoamer is at least one of an organosilicon defoamer and a polyether defoamer; and the flavoring agent is one or more of strawberry essence, lemon essence and apple essence.

5. The gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 4, wherein the organosilicon defoamer is dimethylsiloxane, and the polyether defoamer is polyoxypropylene oxyethylene glycol ether.

6. The gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 1, wherein a gel temperature of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer is 20-30? C., a viscosity of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer decreases when a temperature is lower than the gel temperature, and the viscosity of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer increases when the temperature is higher than the gel temperature; and the viscosity of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer at 20?0.2? C. is less than or equal to 100 mPa.Math.s, and the viscosity of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer at 37?0.2? C. is more than or equal to 500 mPa.Math.s.

7. A method for preparing the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer according to claim 1, comprising: taking pure water, controlling a temperature of the pure water to 2-4? C., adding a thickener, a defoamer, a flavoring agent and a preservative into the pure water at a rotation speed of 800-1200 rpm, then adjusting the rotation speed to 50-100 rpm, adding a solid contrast, then adjusting the rotation speed to 800-1200 rpm, adding an osmotic pressure regulator, stirring for 20-40 min, and finally subpackaging to a 500 ml of brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0028] FIG. 1 is a viscosity graph of gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in various examples and comparative examples at 20? C.?0.2? C. according to the present disclosure.

[0029] FIG. 2 is a viscosity graph of gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in various examples and comparative examples at 37? C.?0.2? C. according to the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0030] Next, the present disclosure will be further illustrated in combination with examples. It should be noted that the following description is only for explaining the present disclosure but not limiting the contents of the present disclosure.

[0031] Poloxamer 407, Poloxamer 338, Poloxamer 237 and Poloxamer 188 used in examples and comparative examples are all commercially available.

Example 1

[0032] 91.84 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 2.7 g of Poloxamer 338, 0.35 g of Poloxamer 188, 0.03 g of dimethylsiloxane, 0.04 g of lemon essence and 0.04 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 2 g of polyethylene glycol modified silica particles with a density of 1.06 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 62.5:17.5:7.5:12.5, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 3 g of xylitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Example 2

[0033] 89.41 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 3.7 g of Poloxamer 407, 0.25 g of Poloxamer 188, 0.04 g of polyoxypropylene oxyethylene glycol ether, 0.05 g of strawberry essence and 0.05 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 2.5 g of chitosan modified silica particles with a density of 1.089 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 60:15:5:20, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 4 g of mannitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Example 3

[0034] 94.42 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 2 g of Poloxamer 407, 0.02 g of dimethylsiloxane, 0.03 g of apple essence and 0.03 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 1.5 g of alginic acid modified silica particles with a density of 1.028 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 65:20:10:5, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 2 g of xylitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Example 4

[0035] 93.39 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 2.5 g of Poloxamer 338, 0.5 g of Poloxamer 237, 0.03 g of dimethylsiloxane, 0.04 g of lemon essence and 0.04 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 1.5 g of hyaluronic acid modified silica particles with a density of 1.044 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 62.5:17.5:7.5:12.5, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 2 g of xylitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Example 5

[0036] 90.39 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 2.9 g of Poloxamer 407, 0.1 g of Poloxamer 237, 0.03 g of dimethylsiloxane, 0.04 g of lemon essence and 0.04 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 2.5 g of polysiloxane modified silica particles with a density of 1.078 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 62.5:17.5:7.5:12.5, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 4 g of xylitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Example 6

[0037] 91.85 g of pure water was taken, a temperature of the pure water was controlled at 2-4? C., 2.7 g of Poloxamer 407, 0.35 g of Poloxamer 188, 0.02 g of dimethylsiloxane, 0.03 g of lemon essence and 0.05 g of deoxygenated sodium acetate were slowly added in turn at 800-1200 rpm, then a rotation speed was adjusted to 50-100 rpm, and 2 g of branched polyethylene glycol modified silica particles with a density of 1.061 g/ml was slowly added, where the silica particles were prepared by evenly mixing silica particles with 75-85 meshes (excluding 85 meshes), silica particles with 85-95 meshes (excluding 95 meshes), silica particles with 95-105 meshes (excluding 105 meshes) and silica particles with 105-120 meshes (excluding 120 meshes) in a mass ratio of 62.5:17.5:7.5:12.5, subsequently the rotation speed was adjusted to 800-1200 rpm, 3 g of xylitol was added to be stirred for 20-40 min, and finally the obtained mixture was subpackaged into a brown polyester bottle, so as to obtain a gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developer.

Comparative Example 1

[0038] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the thickeners are 1.35 g of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, 1.35 g of hydroxypropylcellulose and 0.35 g of sodium hyaluronate.

Comparative Example 2

[0039] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the thickeners are 0.7 g of Poloxamer 338 and 0.15 g of Poloxamer 188.

Comparative Example 3

[0040] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the thickeners are 4.7 g of Poloxamer 338 and 0.65 g of Poloxamer 188.

Comparative Example 4

[0041] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the solid contrast silica particle is not subjected to the biocompatible polymer modification.

Comparative Example 5

[0042] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the particle sizes of the solid contrast silica particles are all 75-85 meshes.

Comparative Example 6

[0043] Each step is the same as that in example 1 except that the particle sizes of the solid contrast silica particles are all 105-120 meshes.

[0044] The silica particle modified by the biocompatible polymer can be prepared by referring to the methods described in Functionalization Mesoporous Silica Nanomaterials, Drug Loading and Release Studies In Vitro (Wang Shuai. Functionalization Mesoporous Silica Nanomaterials, Drug Loading and Release Studies In Vitro [D]. Guizhou University, 2020), Thiol Carboxyl Double-modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles and Preparation Method Therefor (CN107055553A) Preparation and Application of Carboxyl-Terminated Polyethylene Glycol Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles (CN108046276A), Research on Drug Delivery System Based on Mesoporous Silica (Shi Shaoming. Research on Drug Delivery System Based on Mesoporous Silica [D]. Changzhou University, 2021), Construction of Controlled Drug Delivery Systems Based on Aminated Mesoporous Silica/Biological Macromolecules (Li Shangji. Construction of Controlled Drug Delivery Systems Based on Aminated Mesoporous Silica/Biological Macromolecules [D]. Changzhou University, 2021), Preparation of Pickering emulsions with SiO.sub.2 nanoparticles activated with alginate derivative (Cheng Chun-feng, Li Jia-cheng, Yan Hui-qiong, Liu Ruo-lin, Wang Chun-xiu, Lin Qiang. Preparation of Pickering emulsions with SiO.sub.2 nanoparticles activated with alginate derivative China Surfactant Detergent & Cosmetics, 2014, 44 (05): 241-246.), Preparation of Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Loaded Cisplatin and Its Killing Effect on Breast Cancer Cells (Liu Wei-kun, Zhang Meng, Li Bing-long, Guan Xi-dong, Sun Ming-shuang, He Yu-jing, Wang Chun-xiao, Zhao Bao-chang, Zhang Ji-mei. Preparation of Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Loaded Cisplatin and Its Killing Effect on Breast Cancer Cells Journal of Taishan Medical College, 2019, 40 (11): 801-805.), etc.

[0045] According to the YY/T 0681.1-2018 Test Methods for Sterile Medical Device Packaging-Part 1: Guidelines for Accelerated Aging Testing, with a 2-year validity period as the goal, the gastrointestinal ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in example 1-6 and comparative example 1-6 were subjected to accelerated aging at 60? C. for 65 days, and the uniformity of the samples after aging was recorded. The results are seen in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Uniformity of samples after accelerated aging Uniformity of samples Grouping after accelerated aging Note Example Uniform / 1 Example Uniform / 2 Example Uniform / 3 Example Uniform / 4 Example Uniform / 5 Example Uniform / 6 Comparative Uniform / example 1 Comparative non- Sinking of example 2 uniform solid particles Comparative non- Floating of example 3 uniform solid particles Comparative non- Sinking of example 4 uniform solid particles Comparative Uniform / example 5 Comparative Uniform / example 6

[0046] It can be seen from Table 1 that the samples after accelerated aging in examples 1-6, comparative example 1, comparative example 5 and comparative example 6 are uniform, without the floating or sinking of solid particles. The densities of polyethylene glycol modified silica particles in comparative example 2 and silica particles not modified by the biocompatible polymer in comparative example 4 are both higher than the liquid density of the corresponding sample, and therefore the sinking of solid particles occurs, showing the non-uniformity phenomenon of the sample. The density of polyethylene glycol modified silica particles in comparative example 3 is lower than the liquid density of the corresponding sample, and therefore the floating of the solid particles occurs, showing non-uniformity phenomenon of the sample.

[0047] The viscosities of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in examples 1-6 and comparative examples 1-6 at 20?0.2? C. and 37? C.?0.2? C. were measured, as shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.

[0048] It can be seen from FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 that the viscosities of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in examples 1-6 and comparative examples 4-6 at 20?0.2? C. were all less than 100 mPa.Math.s, and the viscosities at 37? C.?0.2? C. were all more than 500 mPa.Math.s; in comparative example 1, since the thickener is a non-temperature-sensitive material, the viscosities thereof at 20?0.2? C. and 37?0.2? C. are not greatly different and all between 500 Pa.Math.s and 600 mPa.Math.s. In comparative example 2, since the addition amount of the thickener is relatively low, the viscosity thereof at 37?0.2? C. is less than 300 mPa.Math.s. In comparative example 3, since the addition amount of the thickener is relatively high, the viscosity thereof at 20?0.2? C. is more than 130 mPa s.

[0049] The developing effects of the gastrointestinal tract ultrasonic examination aided developers prepared in examples 1-6 and comparative examples 1-6 were detected, and the specific method was as follows:

[0050] 4 bottles of 500 ml samples were prepared for each group and stored in an environment of 20?0.2? C. Experimental animals were 4 beagle dogs, ?2/?9-11 months old, weighing around 10 kg, 500 ml of sample with a temperature of 20?0.2? C. was administered by gavage 15 minutes before imaging examination. The gastric and duodenal fullness was observed by ultrasonic examination.

[0051] Scores are given from 0 to 5 in terms of the hierarchy and structure of the gastric and duodenal wall, the gastric and duodenal morphology, the display of peristalsis and emptying function, window time satisfaction, and the effect of eliminating gas artifacts. The scoring criteria are shown in Table 2, and the higher the score, the better the ability.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Effect scoring standard Items Score Judgment criteria Hierarchy and structure 0 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall score cannot be completely observed. 1 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall score can be observed, but is difficultly distinguished. 2 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall scores may be difficultly distinguished to a certain degree. 3 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall scores may be distinguished to a certain degree. 4 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall scores may be distinguished more clearly. 5 The hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall scores may be completely and clearly distinguished. Morphology 0 The gastrointestinal morphology cannot be completely score observed. 1 The morphology of the stomach and intestine can be score observed, but is difficultly distinguished. 2 The morphology of the stomach and intestine may be scores difficultly distinguished to a certain degree. 3 The morphology of the stomach and intestine may be scores distinguished to a certain degree. 4 The morphology of the stomach and intestine may be scores distinguished more clearly. 5 The morphology of the stomach and intestine may be scores completely and clearly distinguished. Peristaltic and evacuation 0 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach function display score and intestine cannot be completely observed. 1 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach score and intestine can be observed, but is difficultly judged. 2 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach scores and intestine may be more difficultly judged to a certain degree. 3 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach scores and intestine may be distinguished to a certain degree. 4 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach scores and intestine may be distinguished more clearly. 5 The peristaltic and evacuation function of the stomach scores and intestine is completely and clearly distinguished to a certain degree. Satisfaction degree of 0 The stomach window time cannot completely meet the effective examination score observation requirement. window time 1 The stomach window time still has great shortage for score the observation requirement. 2 The stomach window time can meet the observation scores requirement as soon as possible to a certain extent. 3 The stomach window time just meets the observation scores requirement at the normal speed. 4 The relatively sufficient stomach window time is scores available to meet the observation requirement at normal the speed. 5 The sufficient stomach window time is available to scores meet the observation requirement at the normal speed. Elimination of gas artifact 0 The gas artifact cannot be completely eliminated. effect score 1 The gas artifact can be slightly eliminated, but the gas score artifact still affects the ultrasonic observation on the stomach and intestinet. 2 The gas artifact can be moderately eliminated, but the scores ultrasonic observation on the stomach and intestine by the gas artifact is limited. 3 The gas artifact can be moderately eliminated, but the scores gas artifact has on influence on the ultrasonic observation. 4 The gas artifact can be observably eliminated. scores 5 The gas artifact can be completely eliminated. scores

[0052] The developing effects in examples 1-6 and comparative examples 1-6 are seen in Table 3 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Developing effect Satisfaction Peristaltic degree of and effective Elimination Hierarchy evacuation examination of gas and function window artifact Average Group structure Morphology display time effect scores Example 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 Example 2 4.75 5 5 5 5 4.95 Example 3 5 5 5 4.75 5 4.95 Example 4 5 5 5 4.75 5 4.95 Example 5 4.75 5 5 5 5 4.95 Example 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 Comparative 1 2.75 3 5 0 2.35 example 1 Comparative 2 3 2.75 1.25 3 2.4 example 2 Comparative 1 3 3 3 0 2 example 3 Comparative 2.75 3 2.75 3 3.25 2.95 example 4 Comparative 2.75 3.75 4 5 5 4.1 example 5 Comparative 3 4 3.75 5 5 4.15 example 6

[0053] It can be seen from Table 3 that the average score of examples 1-6 exceeded 4.9 scores. From various scores, it can be seen that the developing effects of the samples in examples 1-6 are as follows: the hierarchy and structure of the gastrointestinal wall, the morphologies of various parts of the stomach and intestine, gastrointestinal peristalsis and evacuation function can be almost completely clearly distinguished; the gas artifact can be completely eliminated; there is sufficient gastric window time, which may meet the needs of observation at a normal speed. The average scores of comparative example 1, comparative example 2, comparative example 3 and comparative example 4 are 2.35, 2.4, 2 and 2.95 respectively, which are far less than scores of examples 1-6. It can be seen from scores of various items that due to the use of ordinary thickeners in comparative example 1, in order to ensure the window period of the sample, its viscosity is equivalent to the final viscosity of the aided developer described in examples 1-6 when it reaches the stomach. However, the viscosity is not changed from 20?0.2? C. to 37?0.2? C. Therefore, it is difficult to discharge the gas from the stomach and intestine at this viscosity, and the ultrasonic image shows a large amount of gas artifact interference. Therefore, except for the high score during the window period, all other scores are lower. Although there is an increase in viscosity from 20?0.2? C. to 37? C.?0.2? C. in comparison examples 2 and 3, the viscosity at 20?0.2? C. is also too low or high due to the too low or high amount of thickener added. In addition, the density of solid particles is different from the density of the sample liquid. Even if the product is shaken well, there is still an issue of uneven ultrasonic imaging when it reaches the stomach, so the overall score is relatively low. The solid contrast in comparative example 4 is not modified by the biocompatible polymer, so it is prone to settling even in the stomach, resulting in uneven display of high echo interfaces at the gastrointestinal ultrasonic interface. Therefore, its various scores are relatively low. The average scores of comparative example 5 and comparative example 6 were 4.1 and 4.15, respectively, which were relatively high. However, by observing various scores, it can be known that the solid contrast particles in comparative example 5 and comparative example 6 are not mixed with different particle sizes of silica in a certain proportion, so their particle scattering and reflection are single. The hierarchy and structures of the gastrointestinal wall, the morphologies of various parts of the stomach and intestine, gastrointestinal peristalsis and evacuation function scores in the imaging effect are lower than those in examples.

[0054] The above examples are only some examples of the present disclosure, but not all the examples. The detailed description of the embodiments of the present disclosure are intended to only express the selected embodiments of the present disclosure rather than limiting the scope of protection of the present disclosure. Based on the embodiments of the present disclosure, other embodiments obtained by persons of ordinary skill in the art without contributing creative efforts are all included within the scope of protection of the present disclosure.