FLEXIBLE TENSIONED CRASH BARRIER
20240117579 ยท 2024-04-11
Inventors
Cpc classification
E01F15/143
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E01F15/025
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E01F15/06
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
Abstract
A roadside crash barrier configured for deflecting errant vehicles towards the road. The barrier comprising at least one tensioned flexible strap comprising a planar face facing the road in use. Compared to prior art systems, the present invention reduces the chances of injury to motorcyclists, as well as being fast and easy to install. A collapsible end anchor for holding the tension of the straps is also described herein, where the end anchor is configured to reduce vehicle rollover should end on impact occur whilst still retaining the effectiveness of the retained road barrier.
Claims
1. A roadside crash barrier configured for deflecting errant vehicles, the barrier comprising at least one elongate tensioned flexible strap comprising a planar face facing the road in use and a supporting arrangement configured to support the strap at a height above the ground in use, wherein the supporting arrangement, or a portion thereof, is configured to release from the strap during or after impact from an errant vehicle and/or rider.
2. The barrier as claimed in claim 1, where the strap's elongate direction extends parallel the road, or lane of a road, in use, and/or wherein the planar face has a normal direction facing the road, and/or wherein the planar face is perpendicular a surface of the road, and the barrier is configured to deflect errant vehicles back towards the road.
3. (canceled)
4. The barrier as claimed in claim 1, wherein the planar face comprises a surface that is relatively smooth, and/or continuous along the length of the strap.
5. The barrier as claimed in claim 1, wherein the strap is composed of two distinct straps sandwiched together.
6. (canceled)
7. The barrier as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrier comprises multiple straps.
8. The barrier as claimed in claim 1, wherein the supporting arrangement is a rigid, semi-rigid, or deformable barrier.
9. A roadside crash barrier configured for deflecting errant vehicles and road users of a carriageway, the barrier comprising one or more flexible straps with a major planar face having a normal direction generally facing the carriageway, and a supporting arrangement configured to extend from the ground in use, to removably retain the one or more straps at a height above the ground, wherein the straps are removed from retainment from the supporting arrangement during impact from said errant vehicle or road user of the carriageway.
10. An end anchor for anchoring the ends of flexible members of a road barrier, the end anchor having a road barrier end closer to the road barrier, and a terminal end further away from the road barrier that is able to face an oncoming vehicle, the end anchor comprising a. a collapsible support configured to receive the flexible members at the road barrier end, the support post configured to pivot about its base towards the road barrier end, b. a trigger nearer more the terminal end configured to pivot about its base towards the road barrier end when engaged by a vehicle c. a support unit configured to be affixed securely to the ground, the support unit engaged with the base of both the support and the trigger, as well receiving and restraining the ends of the flexible members, d. a brace pivotably engaged on the road barrier side of both the support and support unit, the brace bracing the support so the support can maintain the tension of the flexible members, the brace comprising a pivotable section intermediate its ends allowing the brace to hinge towards the road barrier, e. an actuator extending between, and pivotally engaged to, the trigger and brace, wherein the trigger is configured to pivot at or towards its base when engaged by said vehicle so as to actuate the actuator, the actuator subsequently causing the brace to hinge and remove its bracing capabilities to the support to allow the support to collapse or partially collapse, thus in turn releasing tension in the flexible members.
11. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the end anchor is configured to prevent vehicle rollover, should said vehicle impact the end anchor from the terminal end direction, by allowing the flexible members to lose partial tension or all tension.
12. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the brace acts as an over-centre mechanism.
13. The end anchor as claimed in claim 12, wherein the actuator is configured to push the pivotable section over centre so the brace cannot act in compression to support the support.
14. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the actuator is removably engaged with the brace and the actuator disengages with the brace when the support collapses and/or partially collapses.
15. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the trigger comprises an upper region above where the actuator is engaged to, the upper region acting as a lever to engage with said vehicle.
16. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein the end anchor is configured to move between a collapsed condition and an operating condition.
17. The end anchor as claimed claim 16, wherein in the operating condition the flexible members are held at operating height and operating tension so that road barrier can act at its optimal capacity.
18. The end anchor as claimed in claim 17, wherein in the collapsed condition, when the brace is hinged, the flexible members have their tension reduced compared to the tension at optimal capacity.
19. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein in the collapsed condition, when the brace is hinged, the flexible members at the end anchor are lowered.
20. The end anchor as claimed in claim 10, wherein in the collapsed condition, when the brace is hinged, the flexible members retain tension so the barrier can operate with limited capacity of said optimal capacity.
21. (canceled)
22. An end anchor for anchoring an end of a road barrier comprising one or more flexible tensioned members, the end anchor comprising a road barrier end closer to the road barrier, and a terminal end further away from the road barrier to face an oncoming vehicle, the end anchor configured to move between an operating condition where the end anchor holds the tensioned member(s) in a first tension; and a collapsed condition where the end anchor releases the tensioned member(s) from the first tension, wherein the end anchor comprises a trigger configured to engage with, and be actuated, to move the end anchor from the operating condition to the collapsed condition, wherein the end anchor is configured to not be damaged or weakened if moved to the collapsed condition, and/or the road barrier can be moved back from the collapsed condition to the operating condition by actuating the trigger back to its operating condition.
23. The end anchor as claimed in claim 22, wherein in the collapsed condition the tensioned members are lowered closer to or towards the ground than in the operating condition.
24.-32. (canceled)
Description
[0192]
[0193]
[0194]
[0195]
[0196]
[0197]
[0198]
[0199]
[0200]
[0201]
[0202]
[0203]
[0204]
[0205]
[0206]
[0207]
[0208]
[0209]
[0210]
[0211]
[0212]
[0213]
[0214]
[0215]
[0216]
[0217]
[0218]
[0219]
[0220]
[0221]
[0222]
[0223]
[0224]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0225] With reference to the above drawings, in which similar features are generally indicated by similar numerals, a flexible tensioned crash barrier according to a first aspect of the invention is generally indicated by the numeral 1. A further invention comprises an end anchor to anchor the ends of the crash barrier either end of the length of need, indicated by the numeral 900. The end anchor 900 is preferably used with the crash barrier 1, or may be used with other known barriers that utilise flexible tensioned members. The combination of multiple crash barriers 1 forming a barrier, and the end anchors 900 and other ancillary features is known as the crash barrier system 100.
[0226] In one embodiment now described, there is provided a crash barrier 1 as shown in
[0227] A system 100 utilising the crash barrier 1, will have straps 20 extending laterally between multiple supporting arrangements 70, or engaged to and parallel alongside a rigid or semi rigid crash barrier. The multiple barriers 1 form a length of need, where the length is need is the length of barrier between end anchors 900. At each end of the need is an end anchor 900 to hold or ground the straps 20.
[0228] The straps 20 define a border or boundary 74 generally colinear the strap's elongate direction 71, as shown in
[0229] In one embodiment, the supporting arrangement 70 is comprised of an upright 30 and a mount 50 as shown in
[0230] Preferably the barrier 1 comprises multiple straps 20, either above and/or below other straps, and/or on either side of the upright 30. The straps 20 are preferably mounted to the upright 30 via the mount 50 that engages with the upright 30. In one embodiment the mount 50 is integral with the upright 30. However, in the preferred embodiment the mount 50 is disengageable with the upright 30 as will be later on described in more detail.
[0231] In a crash barrier system 100, the straps 20 are preferably under tension along their length. In a system 100 utilising the barriers 1, at the ends of the need the straps 20 are anchored to an end anchor 900 and tensioned along their length. A variety of end anchors or terminal ends or departing ends as known in the industry may also be used with the crash barrier 1. The end anchor 900 is securely fixed to the ground and redirects or holds the tension forces of the straps 20.
[0232] In one embodiment the end anchor 900 comprises a metal ground plate 901 at ground level affixed to a plurality of support arrangements 970 that are screwed into the ground as shown in
[0233] In other embodiments, as shown in
[0234] Like some other flexible crash barrier systems, upon impact, the upright 30 is able to disengage from the straps 2. In the present invention, the straps 20 are preferably removably engaged to the upright 30, via the mount 50 or via retainers 60.
[0235] In one embodiment, the straps are preferably removably engaged to the mount via retainers 60. The retainers 60 are preferably disengageable from the mount 50 when an errant vehicle impacts the crash barrier 1 to move the upright 30 and/or straps 20 away from their static location above the boundary 74. Due to the straps 20 being in tension and resisting movement, and the upright 30 being moved away by a vehicle, the retainers 60 are configured to disengage from the mount 50 to allow the upright 30 and straps 20 to separate from each other.
[0236] In other embodiments, the retainer 60 stays engaged with the mount 50 upon being impacted by an errant vehicle; however the mount 50 disengages with the upright 30. In other embodiments, both the retainer 60 and the mount 50 can be disengaged from their respective mountings. I.e. the retainer 60 disengages with the mount 50, and the mount 50 disengages from the upright 30.
[0237]
[0238] In other embodiments, the crash barrier 1 may have straps 20 only on one side (as shown in
[0239]
[0240] The upright 30 is in the general form of a rolled hollow section extrusion. The uprights 30 are common in the art. A skilled person in the art will realise there are many ways of forming an upright 30 that is capable of achieving the correct characteristics required for the crash barrier. The characteristics including, but not limited to, deforming upon impact by an errant vehicle, stiff enough to support the straps 20 in tension, relative the cheaper it is to manufacture, and be able to receive the mount 50. Like the prior art, the upright 30 will have a region of engineered weakness between the upper region and the ground. The region of engineered weakness allows the pivoting or deformation to allow an upper region of the upright to move relative a lower region of the upright.
[0241] In the present embodiment the crash barrier 1 comprises a ground anchor 40 configured to engage to the lower region 33 of the upright 30. The ground anchor may be described as being part of the supporting arrangement 70. Preferably the ground anchor 40 is removably connected to the upright 30, however in other embodiments the ground anchor 40 may be integral with the upright 30.
[0242] The engineered weakness may be located at a region along the length of the upright 30, or may be at the connection between the upright 30 and ground anchor 40, or both.
[0243] In one preferred embodiment the anchor 40 comprises a connection or connections, such as a socket 42, that is able to receive or at least engage with the upright 30 as shown in
[0244] In one preferred embodiment, the anchor 40 comprises a screw 41. Where the screw 41 is configured to screw into the ground. Ground screw technology is known in the art. Preferably the ground anchor 40 positioned in a controlled manner for quality assurance. Preferably the ground anchor 40 is torqued to a specific torque and/or pull-out force. The depth that the anchor 40 is screwed into the ground may be predetermined by a GPS surveyor. The height and location is recorded to confirmed coordinates with predetermined parameters.
[0245] An example of a length of a ground anchor 40 is approximately 1000 mm. However a skilled person in the art will realise that many lengths of ground anchor 40 may be used as required for the specific purpose. For example, the length of the ground anchor 40 may vary between 200 mm and 2000 mm. An upper region of the ground anchor 40 and/or socket 42 is preferably composed of tube. The tube is preferably composed of metal, such as steel, high tensile steel, aluminium, stainless steel, or mild steel. The tube in one embodiment has a diameter of 114 mm, with a wall thickness of 3 mm.
[0246] The ground anchor, or components of it, are preferably composed of high tensile steel. In one embodiment, the ground anchor 40 or components of it, have a strength of 350 megapascals, have a skilled person in the art will realise that materials of other characteristics will also be sufficient. In one embodiment the ground anchor 40 is hot-dip galvanized to provide resistance to corrosion. In one embodiment, the upright 30 is comprised of also be of a similar material to the ground anchor.
[0247] Where weaker ground formation or soil types are encountered, or where stronger foundations are required, cement grout or other settable fluids may be injected through the ground anchor after installation. This allows the ground anchor to become cemented to the ground, or at least have the engagement between ground anchor and ground become stronger.
[0248] Preferably, the supporting arrangement 70, or in the preferred embodiment, the upright 30, ground anchor and/or mount 50, is composed of steel or plastics. The upright 30 is configured to bend, crush, flex, and/or crumple upon vehicle or rider impact. This design allows a number of characteristics. Firstly, the upright 30 is able to be released from, or at least move relative to, the ground anchor 40; secondly the upright 30 is able to move upon being impacted so as not to significantly damage a vehicle or rider; and thirdly, it also allows the upright 30 to move away or release from the straps 20. This allows the straps 20 to try and maintain their location on the boundary 74 without being pulled or moved with the upright 30, whilst the upright 30 is moved away with the errant vehicle or rider.
[0249] The upright 30 as previously described may be formed of rolled hollow section (RHS), typically of a size 100 mm by 50 mm. The wall thickness of the RHS may be varied from between 2 mm and 4 mm or what is required to achieve the desired performance or characteristics.
[0250] In operation the rectangular section or upright 30 will provide strong resistance to vertical movement of the strap 20 and weak resistance to lateral impact of an errant vehicle. This is similar to the prior art. The point of failure of the upright 30 is preferably at ground level, where the upright 30 is connected to the significantly stronger ground anchor 40. It is intended that when an incident occurs, the uprights 30, mounts 50, and retainers 60 will be replaced into existing ground anchors 40 and the existing straps 20 of the crash barrier 1.
[0251] In some embodiments, one as shown in
[0252] The present crash barrier system 100 or barrier 1, may be retrofitted to existing crash barrier systems.
[0253] Preferably the straps extend in a lateral direction 71 away from the upright 30. However in some embodiments, the straps 20 may be at an angle from the lateral direction 71 from the upright 30, as the crash barrier 1 is extending around a curve or corner.
[0254] The straps 20 may be composed of a composite material or a metal material. For example, a composite material may be includes a fibre with a binder, i.e glass, plastics, synthetics, aramids or other type fibre with a resin, binder or filler. In one embodiment, the straps 20 are created from fibreglass and a resin. The straps may be formed by a pultrusion process.
[0255] Preferably the straps 20 have a tensile strength of 800 megapascals or greater. However it is envisaged that a skilled person in the art will be able to create a strap 20 according to the considerations and characteristics required by the crash barrier 1. For example there may be more straps 20, with a lower tensile strength, or less straps 20 with a higher tensile strength. Alternatively the straps 20 may have a lower or higher tensile strength depending on their potential working load required. For example, a crash barrier 1 according to the present invention with six straps 20 may have a combined ultimate tensile strength of 1,250 kN on each side of the upright 30.
[0256] In one embodiment, the strap 20 is has a rectangular cross section (perpendicular its elongate length). As can be seen from the figures, the straps 20 are generally flat. Preferably the strap in cross section perpendicular it's elongate direction, has a height far greater than its thickness.
[0257] In one embodiment the straps 20 have a thickness between 3 mm and 10 mm. Preferably the straps 20 have a thickness of 4 mm. In one embodiment the straps 20 have a height of between 40 mm and 200 mm. Preferably, the straps 20 have a height of between 40 mm and 200 mm. Wherein the height is parallel the direction 72 of the elongate axis of the upright 30, i.e typically vertical.
[0258] The flat surface or face 21 has not been seen in the prior art previously. All other flexible crash barriers have cylindrical flexible members to redirect or retain errant vehicles or riders. These cylindrical flexible members have a lower surface area that can cause increased pressures on errant vehicles or riders.
[0259] The straps 20 have an internal face 21 that faces (direction 73, a direction normal to the face 21) the lane of a road. The internal face 21, is a major face 21 of the strap. The straps 20 also have an external face 22 opposite the internal face 21 that does not face the adjacent lane of a road. The external face 22 may also be a major face. Preferably at least one of these faces 21 and 22, and preferably the internal face 21, has a relatively large surface area, or is at least substantially planar.
[0260] Between faces 21 and 22 is a top edge 23 and bottom edge 24, these may be minor edges or minor faces if slightly thicker. Preferably the top edge 23 and bottom edge 24 are rounded. Preferably these rounded edges are configured so as reduce the ability to slice into vehicles or riders. A radius for a top edge 23 and/or bottom edge 24 is between 2 and 10 mm. Where the radius is larger, then the straps will need to be thicker, however in some embodiments a bead may be applied to the edges so they have a higher surface area and are less prone to cut into objects.
[0261] The straps could be of a number of different configurations. As long as the straps 20 have a generally large road facing face 21 that presents a large surface area to an errant vehicle or rider. The face 21 has a normal direction facing the road. The face 21 is generally upright or vertical, or perpendicular the road surface.
[0262] Preferably the internal face 21 has a surface which is smooth and not abrasive so to allow a rider or errant vehicle to slide more easily along the length of the strap 20. In some embodiments, a certain roughness may be required to try and arrest or slow down a vehicle or rider.
[0263] Preferably the straps 20 do not have edges, connections, and/or protrusions that present themselves outward from the lateral direction 71 of the straps 20.
[0264] The figures show an embodiment with three straps 20. However in other embodiments, there may be only one or two straps, or more than three straps. For example, there may be anywhere between one and ten straps on one side of an upright 30. If there is only one strap 20, that strap may have a larger cross-sectional area, i.e. present a larger surface on the face 21 to the adjacent lane of a road compared to where multiple straps are used.
[0265] Preferably in some embodiments the straps 20 are as close to the ground. This prevents an errant rider from sliding underneath the straps.
[0266] Where there are multiple straps 20 in a crash barrier system 100, there may be gaps between adjacent straps 20. The gaps may be between 10 mm and 100 mm in height. Preferably the gaps are 50 mm in height. The gaps i.e. the distance between the straps 20, may be configured depending on the characteristics required for the crash barrier system.
[0267] Where there are multiple straps 20 in a crash barrier system 100, the straps 20 may be identical to each other, or may differ from each other. Such difference may be in; composition, location, size, and/or physical characteristics, etc.
[0268] Preferably the straps 20 are tensioned between their ends, along the elongate direction 71. In one embodiment, the combination of straps 20 on one side of the upright 30 is pretensioned to a combined tension (all of the straps on one side) between 100 kN and 400 kN, however they may be tensioned higher or lower. A typical combined pretension of wire rope flexible road crash barriers is around 80 kN.
[0269] The straps 22 not extend between pay-outs, brakes or spools. The straps 20 are affixed to the end anchors and there is no pay out of extra strap. This is not a vehicle arresting system configured to arrest vehicles from entering a premise or similar. This is a road crash barrier and is configured accordingly.
[0270] The higher strength of the straps 20 compared to the prior art flexible members (i.e wire rope), means higher pretension can be achieved, and hence the ability for the system 100 to reduce the distance an errant vehicle passes past the boundary 74. In one embodiment, the strap has an E value between of 40 GPa and 210 GPa.
[0271] In other embodiments the straps are composed of metal. In one embodiment and the straps are composed of high-strength ductile steel. Preferably the ductile steel has a high yield capacity and has elongation after yield. Where high yield capacity is a yield strength greater than 450 MPa.
[0272] The steel strap must be ductile. Preferably also be capable of elongation of more than 9%. During an impact this means the barrier will provide full restraint at yield strength. During yield the strap will elongate and in an extreme situation arrest the impacting vehicle over a greater deviation. This is not the case with some prior art wire rope in which the elongation before failure is elasticity, not yield. This means in an extreme case wires will break and become a serious hazard.
[0273] In one embodiment, the steel strap is composed of 450 grade steel, with a 530 MPa yield, and elongation of 15% after yield. However, there may be many other variations on grade, yield strength and elongation that are applicable for particular crash barrier requirements. Preferably the steel strap is 3 mm in thickness, but thickness may vary depending on barrier requirements. Preferably the strap has a height (also the front face height) of 55 mm.
[0274] In one embodiment the strap is composed of two or more layers of strap. This may be applicable for both composite and metal, and it may be a combination of the two. In one embodiment the strap is a double layer of steel. It is an object of the strap to reduce the ability of errant vehicles to penetrate or pierce the strap. Having two layers of straps, and in particular, two layers of steel straps will reduce the likelihood of penetration of the second layer.
[0275] Where steel straps are used, it is recommended that the edges should be rounded or otherwise protected to prevent injury. On the uprights or upper edges of the upright or retainer there should be rounded edges or a cap to prevent injury. The cap may be composed of plastics. The steel strap may comprise a plastics coating.
[0276] The length of straps in a system may be between, 20 m and 2 km. The straps may be connected to each together to extend their length.
[0277] In one embodiment, the retainer 60 is configured to retain the straps 20 to the mount 50 whilst the system is at its static or non-impacted condition.
[0278] The mount 50 and/or retainer 60 serve to secure the straps 20 to the upright 30 until vehicle impact. After or during impact; [0279] a) the mount 50 disconnects from the upright 30, and the retainer 60 stays connected with the mount 50 and straps such the straps act as a net to deflect errant vehicles, or [0280] b) the mount 50 disconnects from the upright 30, and the retainer 60 disconnects from the mount 50, allowing the straps 20 to be free, or [0281] c) the mount 50 stays connected with the upright 30, and the retainer 60 disconnects from the mount 50 and stays connected to the straps 20.
[0282] In a preferred embodiment, the mount 50 remains connected with the upright 30 and the retainer 60A/606/60C (aka retainer assembly 60) disconnects from the mount 50. The retainer assembly 60retains the straps in relation to each other so the straps 20 act together as a combined deflector even when disconnected from the mount 50.
[0283] In an alternative embodiment, the mount 50 disconnects from the upright 30 and the retainer 60 also pops off from the mount 50, so the straps 20 are free from the impacted supporting arrangement 70.
[0284] In one embodiment, as shown in
[0285] In a further embodiment, the connection 51 of the retainer 60 to the mount 50 may also act by sliding in a direction parallel the elongate axis direction 72 of the upright 30. This allows the retainer 60 to engage or re-engage with the mount 50. One possible connection 51 is seen in
[0286] The engagement and disengagement direction of the retainer 60 with the mount 50 in the embodiment of
[0287] In a further embodiment, a plug type retainer connection is shown in
[0288] Allowing the straps to be free of both the mount 50 and upright 30 allows the straps 20 to deflect away from the boundary 74. The straps 20 may deflect by 1-2 metres from the defined boundary 74 during a process of redirecting an errant vehicle or rider.
[0289] The straps when retained by the retainer 60, may be held between the retainer 60 and a surface 51 of the mount 50. Preferably the straps 20 are retained in the upright 30 elongate direction 72 by a recess 52 and guide on the mount 50, and/or on the retainer 60. These features may be modified depending on the characteristics required of the road barrier 1, for example how close together the straps 20 are to each other, how thick the straps are, etc. The straps are preferred to held or clamped in by Lurethane, steel, or other like materials.
[0290] In one embodiment, the mount 50 and retainer 60 stay engaged with the straps 20 after impact, to allow the straps to stay in their pre-impact arrangement. i.e the straps are engaged to one another, so they continue to work together or at least move together.
[0291] In one embodiment, for example with a two-sided road barrier 1, the impact side retainer 60 may pop off from the mount, whilst the other retainer 60 stays retained to the straps external to the road side. The mount for example, may stay retained with the straps 20, and the upright 30 may slidingly disengage from the mount 50 as it is impacted by the vehicle.
[0292] Alternatively the straps may be held between an outer retainer 60A and inner retainers 60B and 60C, which are connected with plugs 62 that engage with slots 56 in the mount 50. This is shown in
[0293] In the embodiment shown in
[0294] The plugs 62 may be configured such that the strength of the connection between the retainers 60A, 60B and 60C is greater than the strength of the connection between the retainer 60 and the mount 50. In one embodiment, the plug 62 and retainer configuration allow disconnection of the retainer assembly (the retainer assembly comprising the retainers 60A-C) from the mount 50 at a force of 10 kN. Where preferably this force is direction 73, however forces in other directions may increase or decrease the pull out strength of the plug 62 from the mount 50.
[0295] The plugs 62 may be composed from a polymer material which may be reinforced with fibres to form a fibre-reinforced polymer. The polymer material used may include nylon, epoxy resin, or silicone. The fibre material used may include glass, carbon, aramid, basalt, or like fibres. In a preferred embodiment the plugs 62 are fabricated from 30% glass fibre reinforced nylon. Preferably the plug has some give or flexibility that allows it collapse inwards or deform so it can be pulled through the slots 56 during impact. In other embodiments the plug has frangible sections.
[0296] To install the straps 20 onto the mount 50 of the road barrier 1 shown in
[0297] The connection of the plugs 62 to the slots 56 in the mount 50 is configured as a weak point to allow disconnection of the retainer assembly 60 from the mount 50 at a predetermined force or relative movement. This predetermined force or movement is typically achieved during impact from an errant vehicle into the road barrier 1. The disconnection of the plugs 62 from the mount 50 may be in a direction 73 perpendicular to both the upright elongate direction 72 and strap elongate direction 71, or any combination of the above. The disconnection may be facilitated with frangible, or engineered weakness mounting tabs on the plugs 62, or by an engineered weakness of the slots 56 or the plugs 62. Alternatively, and/or in combination, impact forces may cause the plugs 62 to move vertically within the slots 56, thereby causing disconnection.
[0298] In one embodiment, the plugs 62 have exterior circumferential surfaces of varying diameters suitable to engage with holes in one of the retainers, or with slots 56 of the mount 50. The outer surface 80 sits in a hole of outer retainer 60A, and also supports a strap 20. The intermediate surface 81 sits in a hole of inner retainer 60B, while the inner surface 82 sits in a hole of inner retainer 60C. The mounting surface 83 slots into a slot 56 of the mount 50. These surfaces are shown in
[0299] Preferably the retainer 60 is of a low profile design so to be as flush as possible with the surface of the face 21 of the straps 20.
[0300] The mount 50, and/or other features of the upright 30 or ground anchor 40, do not significantly protrude past the straps 20 towards the road. Preferably the retainer 60 is significantly flush or planar with the external face 21 of the straps 20. Preferably the external surface of the retainer 60 does not extend more than 6 mm past the external face 21 of the straps 20. The significance of this is that a motorcyclist sliding along the barrier will not impact or become hung up on a large protrusion. On current barriers posts, motorcyclists may encounter a protruding metal post.
[0301] In alternative embodiments the retainer 60 may extend further past the face 21. In this embodiment, preferably the retainer 60 slopes gradually from the face 21 to inner most roadside facing surface of the retainer, this may reduce point impacts to a vehicle or rider. A slight chamfer 63 can be seen on the retainer 60 in the figures, this reduces point loading or edges that could snag or impact a rider.
[0302] In one embodiment, as shown in
[0303] In one embodiment, as shown in
End AnchorSecond Embodiment
[0304] The end anchor 900 may be described as including the support arrangements 70 that affix to a ground plate 901, as well as ancillary features such as tensioning arrangements etc. In other embodiments, there is no ground plate 901 or base.
[0305] In one embodiment, as shown in
[0306] And even vehicle that impacts the from the terminal end of the end anchor 900 should not flip or be raised off the ground significantly. For this to occur ideally the end anchor 900 has features that allow the vehicle to stay underground. An embodiment as shown in
[0307] Upon collapse, pivoting or deformation of the collapsible region 995 the upright 930 of the supporting arrangement 970 effectively rotates. This rotation of the upright 930 brings it closer to the adjacent supporting arrangement 970 that is connected by the tensile members 980. The one or both of the upper amount 990 and lower mount 991 have features that allow the tensile members 980 to be released from the respective mounts should the upright 930 be rotated. In one embodiment one or both of the upper mount 990 and the amount 991 have slots 992 993 that allow engagement and disengagement of the tensile members 980. When the mounts rotate, or move towards each other, the tensile members no longer hold tension and as such are unlikely to cause an errant vehicle to flip. The system removes horizontal restraint in one direction along the barrier. In some embodiments the end anchor allows the barrier to collapse when the end is struck be a vehicle but provide tension in the other direction to keep the strap tension for the crash barrier.
[0308] The supporting range 970 comprises to 2 m long ground screws 940, these may reduce the need for a concrete base. The current embodiment of end anchor as shown in
End AnchorThird Embodiment
[0325] In order to comply with the AASHTO MASH American standard used by New Zealand and Australia, a crash barrier system that is impacted end on by a misdirected vehicle, the system must not cause the roll over by the test vehicle. This may be by accelerating the vehicle vertically. By snagging the vehicle, causing it to yaw and then roll. For a low cost barrier system it is preferable that the worst case vehicle (one of light weight 1100 kg) proceeds through the anchor without roll or redirection.
[0326] In order to meet the requirements of NZ and AU authorities (not the AASHTO standard), it is desirable that after an impact collapsing an end terminal, that the barrier system which may be one kilometre long remains in position and is functional. It is acceptable that the barrier is no longer pretensioned, but the ends remain securely held.
[0327] It is also desirable for NZ and AU authorities that after any accident on the length of need, that first responders can de-tension the length of road barrier. Likewise, it is preferable that the end anchor can be moved back from the collapsed condition to the operating condition where the flexible members are fully tensioned. Optionally a first responder can use a vehicle bumper to apply a force to a trigger, such as a trigger post, and release the tension in the tensioned members 20 if required.
[0328] This anchor system described above, and shown in
[0352] One of the requirements of AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transport Officials) is that if an errant vehicle impacts the terminal end of an end anchor 900 of a road barrier 1, the vehicle should not roll. The Transport Authorities in NZ and Australia preferably require that the end anchor readily breaks away, or fractures, or yields, allows controlled penetration, is traversable without causing serious injuries to the vehicles occupants. The end anchor 900 may also be known as a Terminal End. However, in this specification, the terminal end is described as the terminal end of the end anchor 900, farthest away from the road barrier 1, and facing oncoming traffic towards the end anchor 900. The end anchor 900 also has a road barrier end closer more the road barrier 1 and opposite the terminal end.
[0353]
[0354]
[0355] The trigger post is pivotably engaged, at a base pivot 821, with a support unit 850 that is affixed to the ground. On the trigger post 820 and above the base pivot 821 is located an push beam-trigger post pivot 822 that pivotably engages with an actuator 830, such as a push beam 830. I.e the trigger post acts as a lever to actuate the push beam 830. The push beam 830 is rigid and can act in compression so it can transfer movement of the lever. The push beam 830 may be made up of multiple beams acting as one, as shown in the figures. The trigger post 820 has an upper region 823 above the pivot 822. The upper region 823 acts a lever extender that allows the trigger post to more easily and likely engage with a vehicle, it also provides further leverage from the vehicle about the pivot 821.
[0356] The push beam is configured to pivotably engage, and be able to push, a brace 840 that braces a support 810 with the ground unit 850 towards the road barrier 1. The support 810 is preferably a post that vertically supports flexible and/or tensioned members 20 (and in some embodiments these are the straps 20 herein described) via tensioned member supports 813. The support may be any member or shape able to also redirects the straps 20 vertically towards the support unit 850 which retains the ends of the straps 20. The support unit 850 retains the ends of the straps 22 and maintains tension within the straps 20.
[0357] The support post 810 is pivotably engaged with the support unit 850 at a base pivot 811 as shown in
[0358] Should the trigger post 820 be engaged by a vehicle, the trigger post 820 will push the push beam 830 across and into the brace 840. The push beam will move the brace 842 to a collapsed condition which allows the tension of the straps to pull down the support post 810. In doing the above, the straps 20 at the end anchor are lowered to or towards the ground and at angle up to the nearest supporting arrangement. This creates a low angle of incidence of the straps 20 with ground level, and thus this reduces the likelihood of a vehicle from riding up the straps and flipping over. There is also no rigid upright that could pierce or severely damage a vehicle. Should the vehicle continue past the end anchor 900 it could carry onto the deformable supporting arrangements should they be present as described herein.
[0359] Detail of the over centre mechanism is shown in
[0360]
[0361] Where the pivoting sections 821, 822, 811, 846 etc are described as well as in other areas of this specification, the pivoting can occur via deformation, pliability, or other hinging actions, and not only a pin type arrangement as shown in the figures. However, a pin type, or other efficient pivoting systems are most effective as they are less prone to damage, and the system can be reset to an operating condition if there is no damage elsewhere.
[0362] In another embodiment, as shown in
[0363] In another embodiment as shown in
[0364] In one embodiment, the end anchor 900 and its primary components are composed of metal, preferably steel.
[0365] In one embodiment, the flat straps 20 of the present invention may be substituted into a modified traditional wire barrier support arrangement. In this embodiment, not all of the benefits of the present invention will be achievedsuch as a continuous smooth sliding surface. Yet, other benefits, such as increased tensile strengths and larger impact area (the flat face 21) may be achieved.
[0366] Where in the foregoing description reference has been made to elements or integers having known equivalents, then such equivalents are included as if they were individually set forth.
[0367] Although the invention has been described by way of example and with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and/or improvements may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.