Shaped metal container and method for making same

Abstract

A shaped metal container comprising less metal than prior art shaped metal containers while still able to handle sufficient axial load and undergo shaping processes, including necking, without wrinkling, buckling, collapsing or other physical defect is disclosed. Processes for shaping a metal container having a sidewall of variable thickness, wherein a portion of the sidewall having a variable thickness is shaped using a die or dies are also disclosed.

Claims

1. A shaped aluminum container, comprising: a sidewall including an upper sidewall having a thickness in a range of about 0.005 inch to about 0.0085 inch, wherein the sidewall includes a top necked portion and a bottom necked portion, wherein a thickness of the sidewall in the bottom necked portion varies from the thickness of the upper sidewall by at least 0.001 inch to not greater than 0.004 inch; and wherein an entire exterior surface of the sidewall is smooth.

2. The container of claim 1, wherein the container is made from an aluminum alloy having a hard temper.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The following detailed description, given by way of example and not intended to limit the invention solely thereto, will best be appreciated in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and parts, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a pictorial representation of a 14 stage die necking progression for a 53 mm diameter can body in accordance with the present invention.

(3) FIG. 2 represents a cross-sectional side view of one embodiment of an initial necking die in accordance with the present invention.

(4) FIG. 2a represents a magnified view of the contact angle depicted in FIG. 2, wherein the contact angle is measured from where the bottle stock contacts the necking surface.

(5) FIG. 3 represents a surface mapping of one embodiment of a polished necking surface, in accordance with the present invention.

(6) FIG. 4 represents a surface mapping of one embodiment of a non-polished necking surface, in accordance with the present invention.

(7) FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional side view of one embodiment of an intermediate necking die in accordance with the present invention.

(8) FIG. 6 illustrates a cross-sectional side view of one embodiment of a final necking die in accordance with the present invention.

(9) FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional side view for the shoulder necking surface of each necking die in a 14 stage necking system, in accordance with the present invention.

(10) FIG. 8 is a plot of the necking force required to neck an aluminum bottle into a partially non-polished necking die and the force required to neck a bottle into a polished necking die, wherein the y-axis represents force in pounds (lbs) and the x-axis represents the distance (inches) in which the bottle is inserted into the necking die.

(11) FIG. 9 is a perspective view of one embodiment of an expansion die used to expand a 2.087 diameter container to a 2.247 diameter container, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.

(12) FIG. 10 is a top view of the expansion die of FIG. 9 showing line A-A.

(13) FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of the expansion die of FIGS. 9 and 10 along line A-A.

(14) FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view of an expansion die used to expand a 2.247 diameter container to a 2.363 diameter container according to one embodiment of the invention.

(15) FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of an expansion die which can be used to expand a 2.363 diameter container to a 2.479 diameter container.

(16) FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of an expansion die which can be used to expand a 2.479 diameter container to a 2.595 diameter container.

(17) FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view of a die which can be used to set the shape of the lower profile.

(18) FIG. 16 is a side view of five containers, wherein each container represents one stage of expansion of a 2.087 diameter container to a 2.595 diameter container according to one embodiment of the invention.

(19) FIG. 17 is a top view of the five containers of FIG. 16.

(20) FIG. 18 is a bottom view of the five containers of FIG. 16.

(21) FIG. 19 is a cross-section view of a metal container having a sidewall of varying thickness.

(22) FIG. 20 is a cross-section view of a necking die necking a lower portion of the sidewall of the metal container shown in FIG. 19.

(23) FIG. 21 shows a cross-section view of the necking die in FIG. 20.

(24) FIG. 21a is a partial cross-section view of the nose of the necking die shown in FIGS. 20 and 21.

(25) FIG. 22 shows a cross-section of a knockout used in conjunction with the necking die in FIGS. 20, 21 and 21a.

(26) FIG. 23 is a cross-section view of an expansion die expanding a middle portion of the sidewall of the metal container shown in FIG. 19.

(27) FIG. 24 shows a cross-section view of the expansion die in FIG. 23;

(28) FIGS. 25 and 25a depict a metal container after a lower portion has been necked and a middle portion has been expanded.

(29) FIG. 26 shows a cross-section view of a necking die, which may be used to neck an upper portion of the sidewall of the metal container shown in FIG. 19.

(30) FIG. 27 shows a cross-section view of a necking die, which may be used to neck an upper portion of the sidewall of the metal container shown in FIG. 19.

(31) FIG. 28 shows a cross-section of a knockout used in conjunction with the necking die in FIG. 27.

DESCRIPTION

(32) For the purposes of this specification, terms such as top, bottom, below, above, under, over, etc. are relative to the position of a finished metal container resting on a flat surface, regardless of the orientation of the metal container during manufacturing or forming steps or processes. A finished metal container is a metal container that will not undergo additional forming steps before it is used by an end consumer. In some embodiments, the top of the container has an opening.

(33) The term bottle stock is used throughout this specification. However, all of the processes, products and apparatuses disclosed herein are applicable to all metal containers including beverage cans and cups, aerosol cans and food containers. A quotation mark or in designates inches.

(34) FIG. 1 depicts a bottle stock after each stage of necking by a necking system in accordance with the one embodiment present invention, in which the inventive necking system provides for a more aggressive necking reduction scheme than was previously available with prior necking systems and the ability to neck a container through thick wall and thin wall portions, i.e. containers having sidewalls that vary in thickness by at least 0.001 inches and the necking die travels past the thick wall portion and into the thin wall portion in a single stroke. FIG. 1 depicts the progression of necking from an initial necking die to produce the first necked bottle stock 1 to a final necking die to produce the final necked bottle stock 14. Although FIG. 1 depicts a necking system including 14 stages, the following disclosure is not intended to be limited thereto, since the number of necking stages may vary depending on the material of the bottle stock, the bottle stock's sidewall thickness(es), the initial diameter of the bottle stock, the final diameter of the bottle, the required shape of the neck profile, and the necking force. Therefore, any number of necking dies has been contemplated and is within the scope of the present invention, so long as the progression provides for necking without collapse or other physical defect of the bottle stock.

(35) FIG. 2 depicts a cross sectional view of a necking die including at least a partially textured necking surface 10 and a textured relief 20 following the necking surface 10. In one embodiment, the partially textured necking surface 10 includes a shoulder or body radius portion 11, a neck radius portion 12, and a land portion 13.

(36) In some embodiments, a necking die includes a partially textured necking surface 10, which reduces surface contact between the necking surface and the bottle stock being necked in a manner that reduces the force that is required to neck the bottle (hereafter referred to as necking force). It has unexpectedly been determined that a necking surface having a textured surface provides less resistance to a bottle stock being necked than a non-textured surface. As opposed to the prior expectation that a smooth, non-textured, highly polished surface would provide less resistance and hence require less necking force, it has been determined that a surface with a relatively low Ra value, i.e. <6 micro inches has greater surface contact with the bottle being necked resulting in greater resistance and requiring greater necking force. In some embodiments of the present invention, the increased surface roughness (higher Ra value) reduces the surface contact between the necking surface and the bottle being necked, hence reducing the required necking force.

(37) Reducing the necking force required to neck the bottle stock allows for necking dies having a greater percent reduction than previously available in prior necking dies. It also helps to enable the die to neck through varying thicknesses of metal sidewall.

(38) In one embodiment, a textured surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) ranging from more than or equal to 8 in to less than or equal to 32 in, so long as the textured necking surface does not disadvantageously disrupt the aesthetic features of the bottle stock's surface (coating) finish in a significantly observable manner. In one embodiment, a non-textured surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) finish ranging from 2 in to 6 in. FIG. 3 represents a surface mapping of one embodiment of a non-textured land portion 13 of the necking die generated by ADE/Phase Shift Analysis and MapVue EX-Surface Mapping Software. In this example, the surface roughness (Ra) value was approximately 4.89 in. FIG. 4 represents a surface mapping of one embodiment of a textured land portion 13 of the necking die, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention generated by ADE/Phase Shift Analysis and MapVue EX-Surface Mapping Software. In this example, the surface roughness (Ra) value was approximately 25.7 in.

(39) Referring to FIG. 2, in one embodiment, the partially textured necking surface 10 includes a textured land portion 13, a non-textured neck radius portion 12, and a non-textured shoulder radius portion 11. In another embodiment, the at least partially textured necking surface 10 may be entirely textured. Referring to FIG. 2a, the contact angle of the bottle stock 50 to the necking surface 10 may be less than 32, wherein the contact angle is the included angle between 54 (the ray extending perpendicular to the land) and 51 (the ray extending perpendicular from the plane tangent to the point of contact by the bottle stock with the necking surface). In some embodiments, the working surface and/or relief may be entirely non-textured. In some embodiments, the working surface and/or relief is hard turned and lightly polished to knock off rough edges to obtain a surface finish of about 8-10 micro inches, or about 8-16 micro inches or about 8 to 32 micro inches.

(40) The textured land portion 13 in FIG. 2 in conjunction with the knockout (not shown) provide a working surface for forming an upper portion of the bottle stock into a bottle neck during necking. The knockout (not shown) fits inside the container or bottle stock during necking and helps the container to be removed from the die after necking. In one embodiment, the textured land 13 extends from tangent point of neck radius portion 12 of the die wall parallel to the center line of the necking die. The textured land portion 13 may extend along the necking direction (along the y-axis) by a distance Y1 being less than 0.5, or being on the order of approximately 0.0625. In some embodiments, the length of the land portion is between about 0.02 to about 0.08. In some embodiments, the length of the land portion is between about 0.03 to about 0.07. In some embodiments, the length of the land portion is between about 0.04 to about 0.06. In some embodiments, the length of the land portion is approximately 0.04.

(41) Another aspect of some embodiments of the present invention is a relief 20 positioned in the necking die wall following the necking surface 10. The dimensions of the relief 20 are provided to reduce, but not eliminate, frictional contact with the bottle stock and the necking die, once the bottle stock has been necked through the land 13 and knockout. Therefore, in some embodiments, the relief 20, in conjunction with the partially textured necking surface 10, contributes to the reduction of frictional contact between the necking die wall and the bottle stock being necked, wherein the reduced frictional contact maintains necking performance while reducing the incidence of collapse, buckling, rupturing, wrinkling and other physical defects, and improving stripping of the bottle stock.

(42) In one embodiment, the relief 20 extends into the necking die wall by a dimension X2 of at least 0.005 inches measured from the base 13a of the land 13, in other embodiments, at least 0.010 inches or 0.015 inches. In some embodiments, the relief extends into the die wall no more than 0.025. The relief 20 may extend along the necking direction (along the y-axis) the entire length of the top portion of the bottle stock that enters the necking die to reduce, but not eliminate, the frictional engagement between the bottle stock and the necking die wall to reduce the incidence of collapse, buckling, rupturing, wrinkling and other physical defects, yet maintain necking performance. In one embodiment, the relief 20 is a textured surface. The transition from the land to the relief is blended, with no sharp corners, so that the metal bottle stock can travel over the land in either direction without being damaged.

(43) In some embodiments of the present invention, a necking system is provided in which at least one of the necking dies of the systems may provide an aggressive reduction in the bottle stock diameter. Although FIG. 2 represents an introductory die, the above discussion regarding the shoulder radius 11, neck radius 12, land 13 and relief 20 is equally applicable and may be present in each necking die of the necking system. The geometry of the necking surface of at least one of the successive dies provides for increasing reduction, wherein the term reduction corresponds to decreasing the bottle stock diameter from the bottle stock's initial diameter to a final diameter.

(44) In one embodiment, the introductory die reduced the diameter of the container being necked by more than 5% in a single necking stroke, or more than 9% in a single necking stroke. The level of reduction that is achievable by the dies of the necking system is partially dependent on the surface finish of the necking surface, necking force, bottle stock material, required neck profile, and sidewall thickness(es). In one embodiment, an introductory necking die provides a reduction of greater than 9%, wherein the initial necking die is configured for producing an aluminum bottle necked package from an aluminum sheet composed of an Aluminum Association 3104 alloy, having an upper sidewall thickness of about 0.0085 inch or less and a post bake yield strength ranging from about 34 to 37 ksi. In some embodiments, the upper sidewall thickness may be 0.0085, 0.0080, 0.0075, 0.0070, 0.0060, 0.0050 inches, just to name a few examples. In some embodiments, the thickness of the sidewall in the bottom necked portions varies by at least 0.0010 inches. In some embodiments, the thickness of the sidewall in the top necked portions varies by at least 0.0010 inches. In other embodiments, the sidewall thickness in either the top or bottom portions, or both vary by at least 0.0015 or 0.002 In some embodiments, the sidewall thickness varies by no more than 0.0015, 0.002, 0.0025, 0.003 or 0.004.

(45) FIG. 5 depicts one embodiment of an intermediate die in accordance with the present invention, in which the intermediate necking die may be employed once the bottle stock has been necked with an initial necking die. In comparison to the introductory necking die depicted in FIG. 2, the intermediate necking die depicted in FIG. 5 provides a less aggressive reduction. In one embodiment, a plurality of intermediate necking dies each provide a reduction ranging from 4% to 7%. The number of intermediate necking dies depends on the bottle stock initial diameter, required final diameter, neck profile, sidewall thickness and variability of the thickness of the sidewall.

(46) FIG. 6 depicts one embodiment of a final necking die in accordance with the present invention. The final necking die is utilized once the bottle stock has been necked by the intermediate necking dies. The final necking die has a necking surface that results in the neck dimension of the finished product. In one embodiment, the final necking die provides a reduction of less than 4%. In one embodiment, the final necking die may have a reduction of 1.9%.

(47) In one embodiment, a necking system is provided in which the plurality of necking dies include an introductory necking die having a reduction greater than 9%, 12 intermediate dies having a reduction ranging from 4.1 to 6.1%, and a final necking die having a reduction of 1.9%.

(48) In one embodiment of the present invention, a method of necking metal containers, utilizing a necking system as described above, is provided including the steps of providing an aluminum blank, such as a disc or a slug; shaping the blank into an aluminum bottle stock; and necking the aluminum bottle stock, wherein necking comprises at least one necking die having an at least partially textured necking surface.

(49) Some embodiments of the present invention provide a necking system including a reduced number of dies and knockouts, therefore advantageously reducing the machine cost associated with tooling for necking operations in bottle manufacturing.

(50) By reducing the number of necking die stages, the present invention advantageously reduces the time associated with necking in bottle manufacturing.

(51) Although the invention has been described generally above, the following examples are provided to further illustrate the present invention and demonstrate some advantages that arise therefrom. It is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific examples disclosed.

EXAMPLE

(52) Table 1 below shows the reduction provided by a 14 stage die necking schedule, in which the necking die geometry was configured to form an aluminum bottle necked package from an aluminum bottle stock having a upper sidewall sheet thickness of approximately 0.0085 inch and a post bake yield strength ranging from about 34 to 37 Ksi. The aluminum composition is Aluminum Association (AA) 3104. As indicated by Table 1, the bottle stock is necked from an initial diameter of approximately 2.0870 to a final diameter of 1.025 without failure, such as wall collapse.

(53) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 53 mm Diameter Bottle Stock 14-Stage Die Necking Schedule Necking Die Starting Entry Bottle Final Can Percent Body Neck Neck Knockout Contact Station Diameter Stock Reduction Diameter Reduction Radius Radius Angle Diameter Angle Number (in) Diam (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (degrees) (in) (degrees) 1 2.0900 2.0870 0.187 1.9000 8.960 1.500 0.590 72.659 1.8798 0.000 2 2.0900 1.9000 0.080 1.8200 4.211 1.500 0.500 68.828 1.8000 23.074 3 2.0900 1.8200 0.075 1.7450 4.121 1.500 0.450 65.719 1.7243 23.556 4 2.0900 1.7450 0.075 1.6700 4.298 1.500 0.400 62.807 1.6495 25.008 5 2.0900 1.6700 0.075 1.5950 4.491 1.500 0.350 60.022 1.5735 26.766 6 2.0900 1.5950 0.075 1.5200 4.702 1.500 0.300 57.317 1.4980 28.955 7 2.0900 1.5200 0.075 1.4450 4.934 1.500 0.250 54.658 1.4223 31.788 8 2.0900 1.4450 0.075 1.3700 5.190 1.500 0.250 52.588 1.3464 31.788 9 2.0900 1.3700 0.075 1.2950 5.474 1.500 0.250 50.611 1.2706 31.788 10 2.0900 1.2950 0.075 1.2200 5.792 1.500 0.250 48.714 1.1944 31.788 11 2.0900 1.2200 0.075 1.1450 6.148 1.500 0.250 46.886 1.1185 31.788 12 2.0900 1.1450 0.050 1.0950 4.367 1.500 0.200 45.020 1.0675 28.955 13 2.0900 1.0950 0.050 1.0450 4.566 1.500 0.175 43.477 1.0164 31.003 14 2.0900 1.0450 0.020 1.0250 1.914 1.500 0.070 41.363 0.9955 31.003 1.0250

(54) As depicted in Table 1 the necking system includes a first necking die that provides a reduction of approximately 9%, 12 intermediate dies having a reduction ranging from approximately 4.1 to 6.1%, and a final necking die having a reduction of 1.9%. FIG. 7 represents a cross-sectional side view for the shoulder necking surface of each necking die of the 14 stage necking system represented in Table 1. In this example, the portion of the bottle stock being necked has a substantially uniform thickness.

(55) FIG. 8 depicts the force required to neck a bottle into a necking die having a textured land in accordance with the invention, as indicated by reference line 100, and the force required to neck an aluminum container into a non-textured necking die, as indicated by reference line 105, wherein the non-textured necking die represents a comparative example. The geometry of the necking die having the textured land and the control die is similar to the necking die depicted in FIG. 2. The bottle being necked had an upper sidewall sheet thickness of approximately 0.0085 inch, a post bake yield strength of approximately 34 to 37 ksi, and an aluminum composition being Aluminum Association 3104.

(56) Referring to FIG. 8, a significant decrease in the necking force is realized beginning at the point in which the bottle being necked contacts the textured land, as illustrated by data point 110 on the reference line 100, as compared to a non-textured necking surface, depicted by reference line 105.

(57) Now turning to the expansion die, a gradual expansion of a container comprised of a hard temper alloy using multiple expansion dies of increasing diameters, as opposed to using one expansion die, allows the diameter of the container to be expanded up to about 40% without fracturing, wrinkling, buckling or otherwise damaging the metal comprising the container. When expanding a container constructed of a softer alloy, it may be possible to expand the container 25% using one expansion die. The number of expansion dies used to expand a container to a desired diameter without significantly damaging the container is dependent on the degree of expansion desired, the material of the container, the hardness of the material of the container, and the sidewall thickness of the container. For example, the higher the degree of expansion desired, the larger the number of expansion dies required. Similarly, if the metal comprising the container has a hard temper, a larger number of expansion dies will be required as compared to expanding a container comprised of a softer metal the same degree. Also, the thinner the sidewall, the greater number of expansion dies will be required. Progressive expansion using a series of expansion dies may provide increases in the container's diameter on the order of 25%, wherein greater expansions have been contemplated, so long as the metal is not significantly damaged during expansion. In some embodiments, the diameter of the container is expanded more than 8%. In other embodiments the diameter of the container is expanded less than 8%, greater than 10%, greater than 15%, greater than 20%, greater than 25%, or greater than 40%. Other percentages of expansion are contemplated and are within the scope of some embodiments of the invention.

(58) Further, when expanding a coated container, a gradual expansion will help to maintain the integrity of the coating. Alternatively, a container may be expanded before coating.

(59) Necking an expanded container formed in accordance with some embodiments of the invention to a diameter greater than or equal to the container's original diameter X does not require the use of a knockout because the container's sidewall is in a state of circumferential tension following expansion. In some embodiments of the invention, a knockout can be used when necking the container.

(60) Referring to FIGS. 9-16, in some embodiments, the expansion die is comprised of A2 tool steel, 58-60 Rc harden, 32 finish, although any suitable container shaping die material may be used. In some embodiments, the expansion die 500 includes a work surface 100, having a progressively expanding portion 150, a land portion 200, and an undercut portion 350. An initial portion 300 of the work surface 100 in the depicted embodiment has a geometry for gradually transitioning the diameter of the container 700 sidewall 800. The progressively expanding portion 150 has dimensions and a geometry that when inserted into the open end of a container 700 works the container's sidewall 800 to radially expand the container's diameter in a progressive manner as the container travels along the work surface 100. In some embodiments, the expansion die 500 provides the appropriate expansion and forming operations without the need of a knockout or like structure. In some embodiments, a knockout may be used.

(61) The land portion 200 has dimensions and a geometry for setting the final diameter of the container being formed by that expansion die 500. In one embodiment, the land portion 200 may extend a distance of 0.12 or more. In other embodiments, the land may extend 0.010, 0.020, 0.04, 0.05, 0.08 or 0.10 or more or less. An undercut portion 350 follows the land portion 200. The transition from the land portion 200 to the undercut portion 350 is blended. The undercut portion 350 extends at least beyond the opening of the container when the die is at the bottom of the expansion stroke to enable the die to maintain control of the metal as it expands and to minimize the container becoming out-of-round.

(62) The work surface 100 may be a non-textured surface or a textured surface. In one embodiment, a non-textured surface has a surface roughness average (Ra) finish ranging from 2 in to 6 in. In one embodiment, the work surface 100 may be a textured surface having a surface roughness average (Ra) ranging from more than or equal to 8 in to less than or equal to 32 in, so long as the textured work surface 100 does not significantly degrade the product side coating disposed along the container's inner surface.

(63) In some embodiments, immediately following the land portion 200 the surface of the expansion die transitions smoothly to an undercut portion 350 in order to reduce, but not eliminate, the frictional contact between the container 700 and the expansion die 500 as the container is worked through the progressively expanding portion 150 and land portion 200 of the work surface 100. The reduced frictional contact minimizes the incidence of collapse, buckling, rupturing, wrinkling and other physical defects, and improves stripping of the container 700 during the expansion process. In some embodiments, the undercut portion 350 is a textured surface having a surface roughness average (Ra) ranging from more than or equal to 8 in to less than or equal to 32 in. In some embodiments, the undercut portion 350 may extend into the expansion die wall by a dimension L of at least 0.005 inches, in other embodiments, at least 0.015 inches or 0.025. In some embodiments, the undercut portion extends into the die wall no more than 0.025.

(64) A die system for producing containers is provided including the expansion die 500. The die system includes at least a first expansion die 500 having a work surface 100 configured to increase a container's diameter, and at least one progressive expansion die, wherein each successive die in the series of progressive expansion dies has a work surface configured to provide an increasing degree of expansion in the container's diameter from the previous expansion die. In one embodiment, the die system may also include one or more necking dies.

(65) Although the invention has been described generally above, the following example is provided to further illustrate the present invention and demonstrate some advantages that may arise therefrom. It is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific example disclosed.

(66) In one example, the four expansion dies depicted in FIGS. 11-14 are utilized to increase the internal diameter of the container 700 from about 2.087 to a diameter of about 2.595, as depicted in FIGS. 16-18. The expansion die 500 depicted in FIGS. 9-11 can be used to expand the 2.087 diameter container to a 2.247 diameter container. The expansion die shown in FIG. 12 can be used to expand the 2.247 diameter container to a 2.363 diameter container. The expansion die shown in FIG. 13 can be used to expand the 2.363 diameter container to a 2.479 diameter container. The expansion die shown in FIG. 14 can be used to expand the 2.479 diameter container to a 2.595 diameter container. It should be noted that as the diameter of the container expands, it also becomes shorter.

(67) In one embodiment, the containers of FIGS. 16-18 are comprised of 3104 aluminum alloy having a H19 temper. The sidewall thickness is about 0.0088. It should be noted that using some embodiments of the invention, it is possible to expand thin walled (equal to or less than about 0.0041), hard-temper (H19, H39) drawn and ironed aluminum cans varying amounts including expanding these containers greater than 8% in diameter, greater than 10%, greater than, 15%, and greater than 20%.

(68) In one example FIG. 19, shows a container 190 having a sidewall 192 with a thickness that varies between about 0.006 and about 0.008. The container 190 is aluminum in this example but may be comprised of any metal, such as steel, for example.

(69) FIG. 20 shows a necking die 196 necking a lower portion 194 of the sidewall 192. A bottom necked portion 198 is also illustrated as well as a knockout 220.

(70) FIGS. 21 and 21a show a necking die 196, shown in FIG. 20, representing a series of two necking dies used to create the bottom necked portion 198 of the container 190. The table shown next to FIGS. 21 and 21a show the dimensions that vary between the first and second dies, which comprise the series of two dies used to form the bottom necked portion 198 (shown in FIGS. 20 and 25) of the container 190. Part of the working surface 197 of the necking die 196, including the land 199 has a textured surface with an Ra value of about 12 micro inches. The Ra value of the working surface 197 that was not textured had a Ra value of about 8-10 micro inches.

(71) FIG. 22 shows a knockout 220 representative of the two knockouts used in conjunction with the necking dies 196 shown in FIGS. 20, 21 and 21a. The table shown next to FIG. 22 shows the dimensions that vary between the first and second knockouts 220, which were used with the series of two dies to form the bottom necked portion 198 of the container 190.

(72) The table below shows the dimensions of the container 190 before and after each necking step in necking the lower portion 194 of the sidewall 192.

(73) TABLE-US-00002 knockout estimated station start dia. reduction final dia. diameter gap metal thk % reduction bottom necking 0.0080 1 2.088 0.125 1.963 1.9450 0.0090 0.0083 5.99 2 1.963 0.079 1.884 1.8660 0.0090 0.0085 4.02

(74) The dimensions are in inches. The gap is the radial distance between the inner diameter of the land 199 of the necking dies 196 and the outer diameter of knockouts 220. The estimated metal thk is the maximum thickness of the metal being formed by the necking die. As mentioned earlier, the metal thickness of the sidewall 192 of the containers formed in this example varies by about 0.002 in the portion of the sidewall 192 being formed, i.e. the necking dies 196 travel over metal that varies in thickness by about 0.002. The necking dies 196 and the accompanying knockouts 220 are designed to accommodate the thickest metal, as well as the thinnest metal they pass over in the necking process. The thickest metal in the sidewall 192, in this example, is near the top of the container 190. This information also applies to tables appearing later in this specification.

(75) FIGS. 23 and 24 show an expansion die 230 used to expand the diameter of a middle portion 236 of the sidewall 192 of the container 190 after the two necking steps. In this example, two expansion steps followed the two necking steps. The table shown under FIG. 24 shows the dimensions that vary between the first and second expansion dies 230, which comprise a series of two expansion dies. None of the expansion dies 230 were textured in this example.

(76) In the table below, body rad. and neck rad. refer to radii of the expansion dies.

(77) TABLE-US-00003 station start dia. body estimated % expansion bottom expansion expansion final dia. rad. neck rad. metal thk % expansion 1 1.884 0.158 2.042 14.000 0.500 0.0081 8.39 2 2.042 0.040 2.082 14.000 0.500 0.0080 1.96

(78) FIGS. 25 and 25a show the container after necking with the two necking dies shown in FIGS. 20, 21 and 21a and expanding with the two expansion dies shown in FIGS. 23 and 24. The thin wall portion 234 and thick wall portion 232 are shown. The transition between the thin wall and the thick wall can be short or long and gradual. The necking steps followed by expansion steps form a pinch 242 in the container 190.

(79) FIG. 26 shows a necking die 260 forming the top necked portion 262 in an upper portion 240 of the container 190. Because of the scale of the drawing, the land and relief in the necking die is not shown. The top necked portion 262 was necked in multiple necking stations with a series of multiple different necking dies. Additional necking stations and dies may be used to obtain a bottle or other desired shape. A die representative of the five dies used in stations 1-5 is shown in FIG. 27. The dimensions that vary between each of the five dies used to produce the top necked portion are shown in the table labeled Profile I under FIG. 27. None of the dies in this series of five were textured. FIG. 28 shows a knockout 280 representing the knockouts used in conjunction with the five necking dies represented in FIG. 27. The table next to FIG. 28 lists the dimensions that vary between the five knockouts 280. In this example, the outer diameter of the top of the container before necking was about 53 mm (2.087 inches).

(80) TABLE-US-00004 station start dia. body knockout estimated % top necking reduction final dia. rad. neck rad. diameter gap metal thk reduction 1 2.087 0.082 2.005 2.950 1.000 1.9884 0.0083 0.0082 3.93 2 2.005 0.050 1.955 3.000 1.000 1.9382 0.0084 0.0083 2.49 3 1.955 0.045 1.910 3.050 1.000 1.8930 0.0085 0.0084 2.30 4 1.910 0.045 1.865 3.100 1.000 1.8480 0.0085 0.0085 2.36 5 1.865 0.045 1.820 3.150 1.000 1.8022 0.0089 0.0087 2.41

(81) Having described the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention may be otherwise embodied within the scope of the appended claims.

(82) While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.