Fiber pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket
10464790 ยท 2019-11-05
Inventors
Cpc classification
E02F3/962
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E02F5/10
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
G02B6/44
PHYSICS
Abstract
An improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator. The winch attachment has a pair of bucket mounts that are attached to an excavator's bucket. A Y-shaped mount that is mounted on the bucket mounts. A hydraulic motor and spool attachment that is inserted within the Y-shaped mount. And a hydraulic motor and spool that are secured on the hydraulic motor and spool attachment, wherein the spool and the hydraulic motor are operatively connected to each other.
Claims
1. An improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket, the attachment comprises: a pair of bucket mounts that define at least one through hole, each bucket mount is welded to an excavator's bucket at positions that are outward of the excavator's bucket's attachment member; that attach to an excavator's arm; a plurality of pins; a Y-shaped mount that defines through holes on each extremity of the Y-shaped mount, the Y-shaped mount defines two parallel extremities that are hollow and a central extremity that is hollow and that is centered between the two parallel extremities and that runs in an opposite direction from the two parallel extremities, the two parallel extremities are mounted on the bucket mounts and are secured to the bucket mounts via pins that are placed through the at least one through hole of the bucket mounts and the two parallel extremities of the Y-shaped mount; a hydraulic motor and spool attachment that has a first and a second end, the first end defines a shaft that defines through holes that inserts within the central extremity of the Y-shaped mount and is secured to the Y-shaped mount via at least one pin, the second end defines a central cavity; a hydraulic motor that is secured to a first side of the second end of the hydraulic motor and spool attachment; and a spool that is attached to a second side of the second end of the hydraulic motor and spool attachment, the spool and the hydraulic motor are operatively connected to each other.
2. The improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket of claim 1, the attachment comprises a handle that is attached to the second end of the hydraulic motor and spool attachment.
3. The improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket of claim 2, wherein the bucket mount, the Y-shaped mount and the hydraulic motor and spool attachment are all made of either a metal, an iron or a steel material.
4. The improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket of claim 1, wherein the bucket mount, the Y-shaped mount and the hydraulic motor and spool attachment are all made of either a metal, an iron or a steel material.
Description
DRAWINGS
(1) These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regards to the following description, appended claims, and drawings where:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DESCRIPTION
(7) As seen in
(8) The bucket mounts 10, the Y-shaped mount 20, and the hydraulic motor and spool attachment 30 are all made of either a metal, an iron or a steel material.
(9) An advantage of the present invention is that it provides an improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket that allows the bucket mounts to remain on the excavator's bucket when not using the hydraulic motor and spool attachments to pull fiber cable from a conduit.
(10) Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides an improved fiber cable pulling winch attachment for an excavator bucket wherein the spool of the device linearly lines up with the arm of an excavator, thereby maintaining a center of gravity that corresponds to the center of gravity of the bucket that is attached to the excavator's arm.
(11) While the inventor's above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope, but rather as an exemplification of several preferred embodiments thereof. Accordingly, the scope should not be determined by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.