Turf treatment implement
10440875 ยท 2019-10-15
Assignee
Inventors
- Richard John Campey (Cheshire, GB)
- Simon Jonathan Gumbrill (Cheshire, GB)
- Johannes Hendricus Wilhelmus Herman De Kort (HB Breda, NL)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A cylindrical turf treatment rotor adapted to be driven in rotation about a horizontal axis, and provided with wear-resistant teeth extending along one or more helical tracks on the rotor, the teeth being individually attached to the rotor so as to be capable of individual removal for replacement or refurbishing or for reconfiguring the rotor.
Claims
1. A cylindrical turf treatment rotor adapted to be driven in rotation about a horizontal axis, and provided with wear-resistant teeth adapted to penetrate the turf, the teeth extending along two helical tracks on the rotor, the teeth on a helical track being connected to adjacent teeth on the same helical track, wherein the teeth extend at least 60 mm above the cylindrical surface of the rotor, and the teeth being attached to the rotor so as to be capable of removal for replacement or refurbishing or for reconfiguring the rotor.
2. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 1, in which the teeth are removably attached to blades fixed on the rotor.
3. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 2, in which the teeth are bolted on to the blades.
4. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 3, in which the teeth are attached by a single bolt, the blades having recesses or being so arranged in relation to adjacent blades as to define a recess into which the teeth fit so as to be held securely in position by a single bolt.
5. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 2, in which the blades are fixed in slots in the rotor.
6. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 1, in which the teeth extend up to 200 mm above the cylindrical surface of the rotor.
7. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according claim 1, in which the teeth extend on four equally spaced helical tracks.
8. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 1, in which the teeth are comprised of a wear resistant material or tipped with wear resistant material.
9. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 5, wherein the slots are laser-cut.
10. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 5, wherein the blades are welded in the slots.
11. The cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to claim 8 wherein the teeth are comprised of, or tipped with, tungsten carbide.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) A cylindrical turf treatment rotor according to the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(9) The drawings illustrate a cylindrical turf treatment rotor 10 adapted to be driven in rotation about a horizontal axis-axle 10a and provided with teeth 13 extending along one or more helical tracks 14 on the rotor 10, the teeth 13 being individually attached to the rotor 10 and connected to adjacent teeth 13, the teeth 13 having tips 13a extending at least 60 mm above the cylindrical surface of the rotor 10.
(10) The tips 13a may extend up to 200 mm above the cylindrical surface of the rotor.
(11) The teeth 13 may extend on four equally spaced helical tracks 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d.
(12) The teeth 13 are removably attached, so that they may be replaced or refurbished when worn or damaged in use and so that the rotor 10 may be reconfigured. With teeth 13 closely spaced along each of four helical tracks 14, the rotor 10 will be capable of removing in one pass all or substantially all thatch, grass and infected humus and/or sand, but with two tracks only, it will function as a scarifier, selectively removing thatch to a desired depth.
(13) In the embodiment shown particularly in
(14) In the embodiment shown particularly in
(15) The teeth 13, as better seen in
(16) The teeth 13 may be of wear resistant material, but, as illustrated, are of steel tipped with wear resistant material 13a such as tungsten carbide.
(17) In use, as shown in
(18) As shown, the rotor 10 has teeth of sufficient depth and density that they can, using rotor height control arrangement 45, remove all or substantially all thatch, grass and diseased matrix, leaving a friable surface onto which fresh seed may be sown. A roller of, say, one meter breadth, may thus treat a football or like sized field on a single pass, two passes at most, an operation comfortably accommodated within a single day's work.
(19) If the rotor 10 is reconfigured by removing teeth from two of the helical tracks-opposite helices, so as to leave the rotor balanced-and deployed, using the height control, so that the teeth penetrate to a lesser depth, the rotor 11 will constitute an effective scarifier, giving a less drastic treatment.
(20) In either configuration, the rotor 10 will leave artificial grass turf reinforcement, such as Desso Grassmaster reinforcement, unaffected.