Method of extracting a current level for relating to the cutoff of an interconnection
10444265 ยท 2019-10-15
Assignee
Inventors
- Chang Hwi Lee (Seoul, KR)
- Sung Bae Kim (Pyeongtaek-si Gyeonggi-do, KR)
- Si Woo Lee (Icheon-si Gyeonggi-do, KR)
- Man Ho SEUNG (Cheongju-si Chungcheongbuk-do, KR)
Cpc classification
G01R27/08
PHYSICS
G01R19/30
PHYSICS
International classification
G01R19/30
PHYSICS
Abstract
A current level extraction method for preventing cutoff is disclosed. The method may include starting a voltage sweep to an interconnection structure at a certain temperature, measuring an initial resistance of the interconnection structure, calculating a measured resistance of the interconnection structure according to a corresponding input voltage, determining whether or not a resistance ratio of the measured resistance of the interconnection structure to the initial resistance is equal to or less than a preset value, updating a current value corresponding to measured resistance to a potential maximum current level and repeating the step of calculating the measured resistance when the resistance ratio of the interconnection structure is equal to or less than the preset value, and setting the current value corresponding to the measured resistance as a maximum current level when the resistance ratio of the interconnection structure is greater than the preset value.
Claims
1. A method of extracting a maximum current level, the method comprising: starting, with a max current level measurement apparatus, voltage sweeping on an interconnection structure, the interconnection structure being at a certain temperature when the voltage sweeping is started; measuring an initial resistance of the interconnection structure; calculating, with the max current level measurement apparatus, a measured resistance of the interconnection structure according to a corresponding input voltage; determining, with the max current level measurement apparatus, whether or not a resistance ratio of the measured resistance of the interconnection structure to the initial resistance is equal to or less than a preset value; updating a current value corresponding to measured resistance to a potential maximum current level and repeating the step of calculating of the measured resistance of the interconnection structure when the resistance ratio of the interconnection structure is equal to or less than the preset value; and setting the current value corresponding to the measured resistance as the maximum current level when the resistance ratio of the interconnection structure is greater than the preset value.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the preset value corresponds to a temperature variation (T), and the temperature variation (T) is obtained from the following equation,
R.sub.m=R.sub.0(1+TCRT), wherein R0 is the initial resistance, Rm is the measured resistance, Rm/R0 is the resistance ratio, and TCR is a temperature coefficient of resistance.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating a measured current of the interconnection structure, wherein calculating the measured current of the interconnection structure includes measuring, through a monitoring equipment included in the max current level measurement, the corresponding input voltage and the current value corresponding to the measured resistance.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: calculating a measured current of the interconnection structure, wherein calculating the measured current of the interconnection structure includes measuring, through a monitoring apparatus included in the max current level measurement apparatus, the input voltage as a ratio of the input voltage to the current value corresponding to the measured resistance.
5. A method of extracting a maximum current level from a max current level measurement apparatus, the method comprising: starting, with the max current level measurement apparatus, voltage sweeping on an interconnection structure, the interconnection structure being at a certain temperature when the voltage sweeping is started; measuring, with the max current level measurement apparatus, a primary current of the interconnection structure according to an input voltage; measuring, with the max current level measurement apparatus, a secondary current of the interconnection structure according to next input voltage; determining, with the max current level measurement apparatus, whether or not a current difference is equal to or larger than zero, the current difference obtained by subtracting the primary current from the secondary current; repeating the steps of measuring the primary current, measuring the secondary current, and determining whether or not the current difference is equal to or larger than zero when the current difference is equal to or greater than zero; and setting, with the max current level measurement apparatus, the primary current as a maximum current level when the current difference is less than zero.
6. A method of extracting a maximum current level from a max current level measurement apparatus, the method comprising: starting, with the max current level measurement apparatus, voltage sweeping to an interconnection structure, the interconnection structure being at a certain temperature when the voltage sweeping is started; measuring, with the max current level measurement, a primary resistance of the interconnection structure according to an input voltage; measuring, with with the max current level measurement, a secondary resistance of the interconnection structure according to a subsequent input voltage; comparing, with the max current level measurement apparatus, the primary resistance and the secondary resistance to generate a resistance comparison result; and repeating the steps of measuring the primary resistance, measuring the secondary resistance, and comparing the primary resistance and the secondary resistance or setting, with the max current level measurement apparatus, a maximum current level according to the resistance comparison result.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the comparing includes determining whether or not a ratio of the secondary resistance to the primary resistance is equal to or larger than a fixed value.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the comparing includes determining whether or not a difference between the secondary resistance and the primary resistance is equal to or larger than a preset value.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the repeating the steps of measuring the primary resistance, measuring the secondary resistance, and comparing the primary resistance and the secondary resistance or setting of the maximum current level according to the resistance comparison result includes repeating the steps of measuring the primary resistance, measuring the secondary resistance, and comparing the primary resistance and the secondary resistance when the resistance comparison result is within a predetermined normal range of values and setting the current value corresponding to the primary resistance as the maximum current level when the resistance comparison result is out of the predetermined normal range of values.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the resistance comparison result is within the normal range when the ratio of the secondary resistance to the primary resistance is equal to or less than a fixed value.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the resistance comparison result is within the normal range when a difference between the secondary resistance and the primary resistance is within a predetermined value range.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein the resistance comparison result is out of the normal range when the ratio of the secondary resistance to the primary resistance is larger than a fixed value.
13. The method of claim 9, wherein the resistance comparison result is out of the normal range when the difference between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is not within a predetermined value range.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(11) Various embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. The drawings are schematic illustrations of various embodiments (and intermediate structures). As such, variations from the configurations and shapes of the illustrations as a result, for example, of manufacturing techniques and/or tolerances, are to be expected. Thus, the described embodiments should not be construed as being limited to the particular configurations and shapes illustrated herein but may include deviations in configurations and shapes which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined in the appended claims
(12) The embodiments should not be construed as limiting the concepts discussed herein. Although a few embodiments will be illustrated and described, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the disclosure.
(13)
(14) Referring to
(15) The current-voltage characteristic may typically have the relationship that the voltage is in linear proportion to the current according to the Ohm's law. However, the current-voltage characteristic may be represented in the log form through thermal migration between the neighboring interconnection structures m1 as illustrated in
(16) In the embodiment, as illustrated in
(17) Hereinafter, the maximum current level extraction method according to various embodiments will be described.
(18)
(19) Referring to
(20) An initial resistance R.sub.0 of the interconnection structure m1 may be measured (S12). The initial resistance R0 may be a resistance value of the interconnection structure m1 measured under the room temperature. And then, an input voltage Vm (hereinafter a subsequent input voltage) is simultaneously applied to the interconnection structure m1 until the specific voltage, according to
(21) A resistance R.sub.m (hereinafter, referred to as measured resistance) of the interconnection structure m1 according to a selected subsequent input voltage V.sub.m may be measured referring to the
(22) A comparison operation for determining whether or not a ratio R.sub.m/R.sub.0 of the measured resistance R.sub.m to the initial resistance R.sub.0 is equal to or less than a preset value C may be performed (S14). For example, the comparison-step is performed in a comparator (as shown in
(23) When the ratio R.sub.m/R.sub.0 of the measured resistance Rm to the initial resistance R0 is equal to or smaller than the preset value C, it may be determined that the measured current I.sub.m corresponding to the measured resistance R.sub.m does not reach a maximum current level I.sub.j. An operation for updating the measured current I.sub.m as the potential maximum current level I.sub.j may be performed (S15) and then the process may proceed to operation S13. For example, the updating step is performed in a control apparatus (not shown) included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(24) Here, the preset value C may be represented as an increment T of the temperature in the interconnection structure from the initial room temperature and the increment T of the temperature may be obtained through the following equation 1.
R.sub.m=R.sub.0(1+TCRT)[Equation 1]
(25) Here, TCR may refer to a temperature coefficient of resistance. When the interconnection structure m1 is a metal, TCR may be controlled in consideration of a property of a material for the interconnection structure m1.
(26) When the resistance ratio R.sub.m/R.sub.0 of the current resistance R.sub.m (for example, the measured resistance) to the initial resistance R.sub.0 is larger than the preset value C, it may be determined that the current I.sub.m corresponding to the measured resistance Rm is larger than the maximum current level I.sub.j. Accordingly, the current level of the current Inn corresponding to the measured resistance R.sub.m prior to the updating may be set as the maximum current level I.sub.j (S16). For example, the setting step is performed in the control apparatus included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(27) The cutoff due to EOS may be reduced by setting the maximum current level I.sub.j according to the algorithm.
(28)
(29) Referring to
(30) A current I.sub.m+1 (hereinafter, referred to as secondary current) flowing in the metal interconnection m1 according to a subsequent voltage may be measured (S23). Here, the primary current Inn and the secondary current I.sub.m+1 may be measured through the current-voltage curve of
(31) An operation for comparing the secondary current Im+1 and the primary current Inn may be performed (S24). When the voltage is continuously swept, the current value may also be increased in proportion to the voltage. Accordingly, when a difference (I.sub.m+1I.sub.m) that the primary current Inn is subtracted from the secondary current Im+1 has a positive value, the interconnection structure m1 may be determined as in a non-cut off state and the process may return to operation S22. For example, the comparison-step is performed in a comparator (not shown) included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(32) When the difference (I.sub.m+1I.sub.m) that the primary current I.sub.m is subtracted from the secondary current I.sub.m+1 has a negative value, the current may be reduced in inverse proportion to the applied voltage amount and thus Ohm's law is invalidated. Accordingly, it may be determined that the interconnection structure m1 is in a cut off state. The primary current I.sub.m measured just prior the cutoff may be set as the maximum current level (S25). For example, the setting step is performed in a control apparatus included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(33) It has been described in an embodiment that when the comparison result between the secondary current I.sub.m+1 and the primary current Im has a positive value, the process proceeds to operation S22, but the operation of updating the secondary current I.sub.m+1 to the maximum current level I.sub.j may be performed and simultaneously the process may proceed to operation S23. When the process proceeds to operation S23, the secondary current I.sub.m+1 before the process proceeds to operation S23, for example, the updated maximum current level I.sub.j may be interpreted as the primary current I.sub.m and next secondary current I.sub.m+1 may have a current value corresponding to a voltage higher than the next input voltage corresponding to the secondary current just before the process proceeds to operation S23.
(34) It has been described in an embodiment that the maximum current level is set using the measured current value, but this is not limited thereto and the maximum current level may be set using the measured resistance value Rm.
(35) For example, as illustrated in
(36) A resistance R.sub.m (hereinafter, referred to as primary resistance) of the interconnection structure m1 corresponding to a corresponding voltage may be measured (S32). The primary resistance R.sub.m may be measured from the values illustrated in the current-voltage curve of
(37) A resistance R.sub.m+1 (hereinafter, referred to as secondary resistance) of the interconnection structure m1 corresponding to next input voltage may be measured (S33). The secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 may also be measured from the values illustrated in the current-voltage curve of
(38) An operation for comparing the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance Rm may be performed (S34). For example, the comparison-step is performed in a comparator (not shown) included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(39) The comparison between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m may be performed through an operation for determining whether or not a ratio of the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 to the primary resistance Rm is equal to or larger than a fixed value.
(40) The comparison operation between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m may be performed through an operation for determining whether or not a difference between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is equal to or larger than a preset value.
(41) When the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is within a predetermined normal range of values, it may be determined that the current does not reach the maximum current level and the process may return to operation S32.
(42) For example, the phrase that the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is within the normal range may mean that the ratio of the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 to the primary resistance R.sub.m is equal to or less than the fixed value. In another example, the phrase that the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is within the normal range may mean that the differential resistance between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is within a preset value range.
(43) When the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is not within the normal range, it may be determined that the current reaches the maximum current level. The maximum current level I.sub.j may be set as the current value I.sub.m according to the primary resistance Rm (S35). For example, the setting step is performed in the control apparatus included in the max current level measurement apparatus.
(44) For example, the phrase that the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance Rm is not within the normal range may mean that the ratio of the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 to the primary resistance R.sub.m is larger than the fixed value. In another example, the phrase that the comparison result between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is not within the normal range may mean that the differential resistance between the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1 and the primary resistance R.sub.m is not within the preset value range.
(45)
(46) Referring to
(47) The monitoring apparatus 110 may monitor real-time voltage and current information applied to a semiconductor integrated circuit system 200.
(48) The control apparatus 120 may include an operation block configured to calculate a real-time resistance and the like from the real-time voltage and current information provided from the monitoring apparatus 110 and a setting block configured to set a maximum current level through pieces of information provided from the operation block.
(49) For example, the maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may further include a comparator 111 for comparing a ratio R.sub.m/R.sub.0 and the preset value C, as a part of the control apparatus 120 and outputting a comparing result COM 1, referring to
(50) The maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may further include a comparator 112 for comparing a primary current I.sub.m and a secondary current I.sub.m+1, as a part of the control apparatus 120 and outputting a comparing result COM2, referring to
(51) Further, the maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may include a comparator 113 for comparing primary resistance R.sub.m and the secondary resistance R.sub.m+1, as a part of the control apparatus 120 and outputting a comparing result COM 3, referring to
(52) The maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may be implemented in various forms. In an embodiment, for example, the maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may be implemented with software, hardware, or any combination thereof.
(53) The maximum current level measurement apparatus 100 may interface with the semiconductor integrated circuit system 200. Accordingly, the application of a spontaneous voltage or current close to the maximum current level of the semiconductor integrated circuit system 200 may be prevented. The semiconductor integrated circuit system 200 may include a controller 210 and a semiconductor device 220. The semiconductor device 220 may be controlled through the controller 210 which receives information provided from the maximum current level measurement apparatus 100. In an embodiment, for example, the semiconductor integrated circuit system 200 may be implemented with software, hardware, or any combination thereof.
(54) The above described embodiments are intended to illustrate and not be limiting. Various alternatives and equivalents are possible. The embodiments not limited by the embodiments described herein. Nor is the disclosure limited to any specific type of semiconductor device. Other additions, subtractions, or modifications are obvious in view of the present disclosure and are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.