METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN EXHAUST GAS COMPONENT FILLING LEVEL IN AN ACCUMULATOR OF A CATALYTIC CONVERTER

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for controlling a filling level of an exhaust gas component accumulator of a catalytic converter (26) in the exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine (10), in which an actual filling level (.sub.mod) of the exhaust gas component accumulator is determined with a first catalytic converter model (100). The method is characterized in that a lambda setpoint (.sub.in,set) is formed, wherein a predetermined target fill level (.sub.set,flt) is converted into a base lambda setpoint by means of a second system model (104) which is the reverse of the first catalytic converter model (100), a deviation of the actual fill level (.sub.mod) from the predetermined target fill level (.sub.set,flt) is determined and processed to a lambda setpoint correction value by means of a fill level control unit (124), a sum of the base lambda setpoint value and the lambda setpoint value correction value is formed, and said sum is used to form a correction value, with which fuel metering to at least one combustion chamber (20) of the internal combustion engine (10) is influenced.

Claims

1. A method for controlling a filling level in an exhaust gas component accumulator of a catalytic converter (26) in the exhaust gas of a combustion engine (10), with which an actual fill level (.sub.mod) of the exhaust gas component accumulator is determined with a first catalytic converter model (102), to which are delivered signals (.sub.in,meas) of a first exhaust gas probe (32) that protrudes into the exhaust gas flow upstream of the catalytic converter (26) and that detects a concentration of the exhaust gas components in addition to further signals, characterized in that a lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set) is formed, wherein a predetermined fill level setpoint (.sub.set,flt) is converted into a base lambda setpoint value by a second catalytic converter model (104) that is inverse to the first catalytic converter model (100), wherein a difference of the actual fill level (.sub.mod) from the predetermined fill level setpoint (.sub.set,flt) is determined and is processed by a fill level controller (124) to form a lambda setpoint value correction value, a sum of the base lambda setpoint value and the lambda setpoint value correction value is formed and the sum is used to form a correction value, with which fuel metering to at least one combustion chamber (20) of the combustion engine (10) is influenced.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the exhaust gas component is oxygen, that lambda control is carried out in a first control circuit (22, 32, 128, 130, 132), in which the signal (.sub.in,meas) of the first exhaust gas probe (32) is processed as the lambda actual value and that the lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set) is formed in a second control circuit (22, 32, 100, 122, 124, 126, 128, 132), wherein the predetermined fill level setpoint (.sub.set,flt) is converted by the second catalytic converter model (104) that is inverse to the first catalytic converter model (102) into the base lambda setpoint value of the lambda control and wherein in parallel thereto a fill level control error is formed as the difference of the fill level (.sub.mod) that is modelled with the first catalytic converter model (100) from the filtered fill level setpoint value (.sub.set,flt), said fill level control error is delivered to a fill level control algorithm (124), which forms therefrom a lambda setpoint value correction value and wherein said lambda setpoint value correction value is added to the base lambda setpoint value that is calculated by the inverse second catalytic converter model (104) and the sum calculated thereby forms the lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set).

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) is a component of a system model (100), which comprises an output lambda model (106) in addition to the first catalytic converter model (102).

4. The method as claimed in any claim 1, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) comprises an input emissions model (108) and a fill level and emissions model (110).

5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) comprises sub models, each of which is associated with a sub volume of the real catalytic converter (26).

6. The method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the output lambda model (106) is configured to convert concentrations of the individual exhaust gas components calculated using the first catalytic converter model (102) into a signal that is compared with the signal of a second exhaust gas probe (34) that is disposed downstream of the catalytic converter (26) and that is exposed to exhaust gas.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that the signal calculated with the output lambda model (106) is compared with the signal measured by the second exhaust gas probe (34).

8. The method as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that parameters of the system model (100) are successively varied until a lambda value .sub.out,mod that is modelled for the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalytic converter (26) corresponds to a lambda value .sub.out,meas that is measured there.

9. The method as claimed in any claim 1, characterized in that the predetermined setpoint value lies between 10% and 50% of the maximum oxygen storage capacity of the catalytic converter (26).

10. A control unit (16) that is designed for controlling a filling level of an exhaust gas component accumulator of a catalytic converter (26) that is disposed in the exhaust gas of a combustion engine (10), and that is designed to determine an actual fill level (.sub.mod) of the exhaust gas component accumulator with a first catalytic converter model (102), to which are delivered signals (.sub.in,meas) of a first exhaust gas probe (32) that protrudes into the exhaust gas flow upstream of the catalytic converter (26) and that detects a concentration of the exhaust gas component in addition to further signals, characterized in that the control unit (116) is designed to form a lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set), to convert a specified setpoint fill level (.sub.set,flt) into a base lambda setpoint value by a second catalytic converter model (104) that is inverse to the first catalytic converter model (100), to determine a difference of the actual fill level (.sub.mod) from the specified fill level setpoint (.sub.set,flt) and to process the same to a lambda setpoint value correction value by a fill level controller (124), to form a sum of the base lambda setpoint value and the lambda setpoint value correction value and to use the sum to form a correction value and thereby to influence the fuel metering to at least one combustion chamber (20) of the combustion engine (10).

11. (canceled)

12. The method as claimed in any claim 1, characterized in that the predetermined setpoint value lies between 25% and 35% of the maximum oxygen storage capacity of the catalytic converter (26).

13. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that the exhaust gas component is oxygen, that lambda control is carried out in a first control circuit (22, 32, 128, 130, 132), in which the signal (.sub.in,meas) of the first exhaust gas probe (32) is processed as the lambda actual value and that the lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set) is formed in a second control circuit (22, 32, 100, 122, 124, 126, 128, 132), wherein the predetermined fill level setpoint (.sub.set,flt) is converted by the second catalytic converter model (104) that is inverse to the first catalytic converter model (102) into the base lambda setpoint value of the lambda control and wherein in parallel thereto a fill level control error is formed as the difference of the fill level (.sub.mod) that is modelled with the first catalytic converter model (100) from the filtered fill level setpoint value (.sub.set,flt), said fill level control error is delivered to a fill level control algorithm (124), which forms therefrom a lambda setpoint value correction value and wherein said lambda setpoint value correction value is added to the base lambda setpoint value that is calculated by the inverse second catalytic converter model (104) and the sum calculated thereby forms the lambda setpoint value (.sub.in,set).

14. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) is a component of a system model (100), which comprises an output lambda model (106) in addition to the first catalytic converter model (102).

15. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) comprises an input emissions model (108) and a fill level and emissions model (110).

16. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 15, characterized in that the first catalytic converter model (102) comprises sub models, each of which is associated with a sub volume of the real catalytic converter (26).

17. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 14, characterized in that the output lambda model (106) is configured to convert concentrations of the individual exhaust gas components calculated using the first catalytic converter model (102) into a signal that cis compared with the signal of a second exhaust gas probe (34) that is disposed downstream of the catalytic converter (26) and that is exposed to exhaust gas.

18. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 17, characterized in that the signal calculated with the output lambda model (106) is compared with the signal measured by the second exhaust gas probe (34).

19. The control unit (16) as claimed in claim 18, characterized in that parameters of the system model (100) are successively varied until a lambda value .sub.out,mod that is modelled for the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalytic converter (26) corresponds to a lambda value .sub.out,meas that is measured there.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0023] Exemplary embodiments of the invention are represented in the drawings and are described in detail in the following description. In this case, the same reference characters in different figures each refer to the same elements or at least to functionally comparable elements. In the figures, in schematic form in each case:

[0024] FIG. 1 shows a combustion engine with an exhaust system as the technical environment of the invention;

[0025] FIG. 2 shows a functional block diagram of a system model; and

[0026] FIG. 3 shows a functional block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0027] The invention is described below using the example of a three-way catalytic converter and for oxygen as the exhaust gas component to be stored. But the invention can also be correspondingly transferred to other types of catalytic converter and exhaust gas components such as oxides of nitrogen and hydrocarbons. An exhaust system with a three-way catalytic converter is assumed below for the sake of simplicity. The invention is correspondingly also transferable to exhaust systems with a plurality of catalytic converters. In this case the front and rear zones described below can extend over a plurality of catalytic converters or can lie in different catalytic converters.

[0028] FIG. 1 shows a combustion engine 10 with an air delivery system 12, an exhaust system 14 and a control unit 16 in detail. In the air delivery system 12 there is an air flow sensor 18 and a choke flap of a choke flap unit 19 disposed downstream of the air flow sensor 18. The air flowing via the air delivery system 12 into the combustion engine 10 is mixed in combustion chambers 20 of the combustion engine 10 with gasoline that is directly injected into the combustion chambers 20 by means of injection valves 22. The resulting combustion chamber fillings are ignited and combusted with ignition devices 24, for example ignition plugs. A rotation angle sensor 25 detects the rotation angle of a shaft of the combustion engine 10 and as a result the control unit 16 enables triggering of the ignitions in specified angular positions of the shaft. The exhaust gas resulting from the combustions is passed through the exhaust system 14.

[0029] The exhaust system 14 comprises a catalytic converter 26. The catalytic converter 26 is for example a three-way catalytic converter, which as is well known converts the three exhaust gas components, oxides of nitrogen, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, on three reaction pathways and has an oxygen storing effect. In the example represented, the three-way catalytic converter 26 comprises a first zone 26.1 and a second zone 26.2. Exhaust gas 28 flows through both zones. The first, forward zone 26.1 extends in the flow direction across a forward region of the three-way catalytic converter 26. The second, rear zone 26.2 extends downstream of the first zone 26.1 across a rear region of the three-way catalytic converter 26. Of course, further zones can be disposed upstream of the forward zone 26.1 and downstream of the rear zone 26.2 and between the two zones, for which the respective fill level may also be modelled.

[0030] Upstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26, a forward exhaust gas probe 32 that is exposed to the exhaust gas 28 is disposed immediately upstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26. Downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26, a rear exhaust gas probe 34 that is exposed to the exhaust gas 28 is likewise disposed immediately downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26. The forward exhaust gas probe 32 is preferably a wideband lambda probe that enables the measurement of the air ratio A over a wide range of air ratios. The rear exhaust gas probe 34 is preferably a so-called step-type lambda probe, with which the air ratio =1 can be measured particularly accurately, since the signal of said exhaust gas probe 34 changes abruptly there. Cf Kraftfahrtechnisches Taschenbuch (Automotive Pocketbook), 23rd Edition, Page 524.

[0031] In the represented exemplary embodiment, a temperature sensor 36 that is exposed to the exhaust gas 28 and that detects the temperature of the three-way catalytic converter 26 is disposed in thermal contact with the exhaust gas 28 at the three-way catalytic converter 26.

[0032] The control unit 16 processes the signals of the air flow sensor 18, the rotation angle sensor 25, the forward exhaust gas probe 32, the rear exhaust gas probe 34 and the temperature sensor 36 and forms therefrom actuation signals for adjustment of the angular position of the choke flap, for triggering ignitions by the ignition device 24 and for injecting fuel through the injection valves 22. Alternatively or in addition, the control unit 16 also processes signals of other or further sensors for actuating the represented actuators or even further or other actuators, for example the signal of a driver's demand sensor 40 that detects a gas pedal position. An overrun mode with switch-off of the fuel delivery is triggered by releasing the gas pedal, for example. This and the functions that are yet to be described below are carried out by an engine control program 16.1 running in the control unit 16 during operation of the combustion engine 10. In this application, a system model 100, a catalytic converter model 102, an inverse catalytic converter model 104 (cf. FIG. 3) and an output lambda model 106 are used. FIG. 2 shows a functional block diagram of a system model 100. The system model 100 consists of the catalytic converter model 102 and the output lambda model 106. The catalytic converter model 102 comprises an input emissions model 108 and a fill level and output emissions model 110. Moreover, the catalytic converter model 102 comprises an algorithm 112 for calculating an average fill level .sub.mod of the catalytic converter 26. The models are each algorithms that are executed in the control unit 16 and that combine input variables, which also act on the real object that is simulated with the computer model, with output variables so that the calculated output variables correspond to the output variables of the real object very accurately.

[0033] The input emissions model 108 is designed to convert the signal .sub.in,meas of the exhaust gas probe 32 disposed upstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26 as the input variable into the input variable w.sub.in,mod required for the subsequent level model 110. For example, a conversion of lambda in the concentrations of O.sub.2, CO, H.sub.2 and HC upstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26 using the input emissions model 108 is advantageous.

[0034] With the variable w.sub.in,mod calculated by the input emissions model 108 and possibly additional input variables (for example exhaust gas or catalytic converter temperatures, exhaust gas mass flow and the current maximum oxygen storage capacity of the three-way catalytic converter 26) a fill level .sub.mod of the three-way catalytic converter 26 and concentrations w.sub.out,mod of the individual exhaust gas components at the output of the three-way catalytic converter 26 are modelled in the fill level and output emissions model 110.

[0035] In order to be able to portray filling and emptying processes more realistically, the three-way catalytic converter 26 is preferably divided conceptually by the algorithm into a plurality of zones or sub volumes 26.1, 26.2 disposed successively in the flow direction of the exhaust gases 28, and the concentrations of the individual exhaust gas components are determined using the reaction kinetics for each of said zones 26.1, 26.2. Said concentrations can in turn each be converted to a fill level for the individual zones 26.1, 26.2, preferably to an oxygen fill level normalized to the current maximum oxygen storage capacity.

[0036] The fill levels of individual or all zones 26.1, 26.2 can be combined by means of a suitable weighting to a total fill level that reflects the state of the three-way catalytic converter 26. For example, the fill levels of all zones 26.1, 26.2 can in the simplest case all be equally weighted and thereby an average fill level can be determined. However, with a suitable weighting it can also be taken into account that the fill level in a comparatively small zone 26.2 at the output of the three-way catalytic converter 26 is decisive for the current exhaust gas composition downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26, whereas the fill level in the upstream zone 26.1 and the development thereof are decisive for the development of the fill level in said small zone 26.2 at the output of the three-way catalytic converter 26. For the sake of simplicity, an average oxygen fill level is assumed below.

[0037] The algorithm of the output lambda model 106 converts the concentrations w.sub.out,mod of the individual exhaust gas components at the output of the catalytic converter 26 that are calculated with the catalytic converter model 102 for adaptation of the system model 100 to a signal .sub.out,mod, which can be compared with the signal .sub.out,meas of the exhaust gas probe 34 that is disposed downstream of the catalytic converter 26. The lambda downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26 is preferably modelled.

[0038] The system model 100 is thereby used on the one hand for modelling at least an average fill level .sub.mod of the catalytic converter 26, which is controlled to a fill level setpoint at which the catalytic converter 26 is safely within the catalytic converter window. On the other hand, the system model 100 provides a modelled signal .sub.out,mod of the exhaust gas probe 34 that is disposed downstream of the catalytic converter 26. It is described further below how said modelled signal .sub.out,mod of the rear exhaust gas probe 34 is advantageously used for adaptation of the system model 100.

[0039] FIG. 3 shows a functional block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a method according to the invention together with device elements that act on the function blocks or that are influenced by the function blocks.

[0040] FIG. 3 shows in detail how the signal .sub.out,mod of the rear exhaust gas probe 34 that is modelled by the output lambda model 106 is compared with the real output signal .sub.out,meas of the rear exhaust gas probe 34. For this purpose, the two signals .sub.out,mod and .sub.out,meas are delivered to an adaptation block 114. The adaptation block 114 compares the two signals .sub.out,mod and .sub.out,meas with each other. For example, a step-type lambda probe that is disposed as an exhaust gas probe 34 downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26 unambiguously indicates when the three-way catalytic converter 26 is completely filled with oxygen or completely emptied of oxygen. This can be used following lean or rich phases to bring the modelled oxygen fill level into agreement with the actual oxygen fill level, or to bring the modelled output lambda into agreement with the lambda .sub.out,meas that is measured downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26, and to adapt the system model 100 in the event of differences. The adaptation is carried out for example by the adaptation block 114 successively varying parameters of the algorithm of the system model 100 over the adaptation system 116 that is shown dashed until the lambda value .sub.out,mod that is modelled for the exhaust gas flowing out of the three-way catalytic converter 26 corresponds to the lambda value .sub.out,meas that is measured there.

[0041] As a result, inaccuracies of measurement variables or model variables that enter the system model 100 are compensated. From the circumstance that the modelled value .sub.out,mod corresponds to the measured lambda value .sub.out,meas it can be concluded that the fill level .sub.mod modelled with the system model 100 or with the first catalytic converter model 102 also corresponds to the fill level of the three-way catalytic converter 26 that cannot be measured with on-board means. It can then further be concluded that the second catalytic converter model 104 that is inverse to the first catalytic converter model 102, and which results from mathematical conversions from the algorithm of the first catalytic converter model 102, also correctly describes the behavior of the modelled system.

[0042] This is used in the present invention to calculate a base lambda setpoint value with the inverse second catalytic converter model 104. For this purpose, a fill level setpoint value .sub.set,flt filtered by optional filtering 120 is delivered as an input variable to the inverse second catalytic converter model 104.

[0043] The filtering 120 is carried out for the purpose of only permitting such changes of the input variable of the inverse second catalytic converter model 104 that the control loop can follow as a whole. A still unfiltered setpoint value .sub.set is in this case read from a memory 118 of the control unit 16. For this purpose, the memory 118 is preferably addressed with current operational parameters of the combustion engine 10. The operational parameters are for example, but not necessarily, the revolution rate that is detected by the revolution rate sensor 25 and the load on the combustion engine 10 that is detected by the air flow sensor 18.

[0044] The filtered fill level setpoint value .sub.set,flt is processed to a base lambda setpoint value BLSW with the inverse second catalytic converter model 104. In parallel with said processing, in an operation 122 a fill level control error FSRA is formed as the difference of the fill level .sub.mod modelled with the system model 100 or modelled with the first catalytic converter model 102 from the filtered fill level setpoint value .sub.set,flt. Said fill level control error FSRA is delivered to a fill level control algorithm 124, which forms therefrom a lambda setpoint value correction value LSKW. Said lambda setpoint value correction value LSKW is added in the operation 126 to the base lambda setpoint value BLSW that is calculated by the inverse system model 104.

[0045] In a preferred design, the sum formed in this way is used as the setpoint value of a conventional lambda controller. The actual lambda value .sub.in,meas provided by the first exhaust gas probe 32 is subtracted from said lambda setpoint value .sub.in,set in an operation 128. The control error RA formed in this way is converted by a usual control algorithm 130 into a control variable SG, which in an operation 132 is operated on for example by multiplication with a base value BW of an injection pulse width t.sub.inj that is specified depending on operating parameters of the combustion engine 10. The base values BW are stored in a memory 134 of the control unit 16. Here too, the operating parameters are preferably, but not necessarily, the load on and the revolution rate of the combustion engine 10. Fuel is injected into the combustion chambers 20 of the combustion engine 10 via the injection valves 22 with the injection pulse width t.sub.inj resulting from the product.

[0046] In this way the conventional lambda control is superimposed on the control of the oxygen fill level of the catalytic converter 26. In this case the average oxygen fill level .sub.mod that is modelled using the system model 100 or with the first catalytic converter model 102 is for example controlled to a setpoint value .sub.set,flt, which minimizes the probability of breakthroughs following lean and rich phases and thus results in minimal emissions. As the base lambda setpoint value BLSW is formed by the inverted second system model 104 in this case, the control error of the fill level control means is zero if the modelled average fill level .sub.mod is identical to the prefiltered fill level setpoint .sub.set,flt. The fill level control algorithm 124 only engages if this is not the case. Because the formation of the base lambda setpoint value acting as it were as the pilot control of the fill level control means is implemented as an inverted second catalytic converter model 104 of the first catalytic converter model 102, said pilot control can be adapted similarly to the adaptation of the first catalytic converter model 102 based on the signal .sub.in,meas of the second exhaust gas probe 34 that is disposed downstream of the three-way catalytic converter 26. This is illustrated in FIG. 3 by the branch of the adaptation system 116 leading to the inverted system model 104.

[0047] With the exception of the exhaust system 26, the exhaust gas probes 32, 34, the air flow sensor 18, the rotation angle sensor 25 and the injection valves 22, all the elements represented in FIG. 3 are elements of a control unit 16 according to the invention. With the exception of the memories 118, 134, in this case all other elements of FIG. 3 are parts of the engine control program 16.1, which is stored in the control unit 16 and runs therein.

[0048] The elements 22, 32, 128, 130 and 132 form a first control circuit, in which a lambda control is carried out, in which the signal .sub.in,meas of the first exhaust gas probe (32) is processed as the actual lambda value. The lambda setpoint value .sub.in,set of the first control circuit is formed in a second control circuit that comprises the elements 22, 32, 100, 122, 124, 126, 128, 132.