Synthesis of trichlorosilane from tetrachlorosilane and hydridosilanes
11691883 · 2023-07-04
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01J14/005
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C01B33/1071
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
B01J14/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The invention relates to a process for the preparation of trichlorosilane (HSiCl3) which comprises the reaction of tetrachlorosilane (SiCU) with hydridosilanes in the presence of a catalyst.
Claims
1. A process for the preparation of trichlorosilane (HSiCl.sub.3) comprising reacting tetrachlorosilane (SiCl.sub.4) with at least one hydridosilane in the presence of at least one catalyst, wherein the hydridosilanes are selected from the group consisting of MeSiH.sub.3, Me.sub.3SiH, Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2, Me.sub.2SiHCl, PhSiH.sub.3, Ph.sub.2SiH.sub.2, PhMeSiH.sub.2, iPr.sub.2SiH.sub.2, Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2, tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2, Me.sub.2Si(OEt)H, ViSiH.sub.3, ViMeSiH.sub.2, Me.sub.2HSi—SiHMe.sub.2, MeH.sub.2Si—SiH.sub.2Me, MeH.sub.2Si—SiHMe.sub.2, Me.sub.3Si—SiHMe.sub.2, and Me.sub.3Si—SiH.sub.2Me.
2. A process for the preparation of trichlorosilane (HSiCl.sub.3) comprising reacting tetrachlorosilane (SiCl.sub.4) with at least one hydridosilane in the presence of at least one catalyst, wherein the at least one catalyst is selected from the group consisting of: one or more compounds of the formula R.sup.1.sub.4QZ, wherein R.sup.1 is independently chosen from hydrogen or an organyl group, Q is nitrogen, arsenic, antimony or bismuth, and Z is halogen, one or more phosphines of the formula R.sup.1.sub.3P, wherein R.sup.1 is as defined above, one or more alkali metal halides, and one or more an alkaline earth metal halides.
3. The process of claim 1, comprising reacting tetrachlorosilane with dimethylsilane according to the reaction equations (I) or (II):
Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2+2 SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.2 HSiCl.sub.3+Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (I),
Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2+SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3+Me.sub.2SiHCl (II).
4. The process according to claim 1, which is carried out at a temperature in the range of about −40° C. to about 250° C.
5. The process according to claim 1, which is carried out at a pressure from about 0.1 to about 10 bar.
6. The process according to claim 1, which is carried out under inert conditions.
7. A process for the preparation of trichlorosilane (HSiCl.sub.3) comprising reacting tetrachlorosilane (SiCl.sub.4) with at least one hydridosilane in the presence of at least one catalyst, wherein the at least one hydridosilane is selected from the group consisting of formulae:
R.sub.nSiX.sub.mH.sub.4-n-m (1),
and
R.sub.oSi.sub.2X.sub.pH.sub.6-o-p (2), wherein R is an organic group, X is halogen or alkoxy, n is 0 to 3, m is 0 to 2, and n+m=0 to 3, o is 0 to 5, p is 0 to 5, and o+p=1 to 5 further comprising hydrogenating the resulting chlorosilanes to hydridosilanes of the formulae (1) or (2), and recycling said hydridosilanes into the reaction with tetrachlorosilane.
8. The process according to claim 7, which is carried out in the presence of R.sup.1.sub.4QZ, wherein R.sup.1 is an organyl group, Q is nitrogen, and Z is chlorine.
9. The process according to claim 7, which is carried out in the presence of at least one solvent.
10. The process according to claim 7, wherein the hydrogenating step is carried out with at least one hydrogenation agent selected from the group consisting of metal hydrides.
11. The process according to claim 1, which comprises A) reacting tetrachlorosilane with dimethylsilane according to the reaction equation (I) or (II):
Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2+2 SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.2 HSiCl.sub.3+Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (I)
Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2+SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3+Me.sub.2SiHCl (II), in the presence of a catalyst of the formula R.sup.1.sub.4QZ, wherein R.sup.1 is an organyl group, Q is phosphorus or nitrogen, and Z is chlorine, B) separating the HSiCl.sub.3 and Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 or Me.sub.2SiHCl from the reaction mixture, C) hydrogenating the Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 or Me.sub.2SiHCl or part thereof (which means that not the entire amount of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 or Me.sub.2SiHCl is subjected to hydrogenating) with at least one metal hydride, to form Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, D) recycling the Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, into step A).
12. The process according to claim 1, wherein the selectivity of the formation of HSiCl.sub.3, defined as
Molar amount of HSiCl.sub.3 formed/molar amounts of all hydrogenated silanes formed (ΣH.sub.1-4SiCl.sub.0-3, wherein the sum of number of hydrogen atoms and chlorine atoms adds up to 4)×100 is at least about 90%.
13. The process according to claim 1, wherein the molar ratios of the at least one hydridosilanes to tetrachlorosilane (SiCl.sub.4) is in the range of about 0.05 to about 2.
14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the at least one hydridosilane is formed in situ from chlorosilanes and LiH.
15. The process according to claim 1, which is carried out in the absence of at least one solvent.
16. The process according to claim 7, wherein the hydrogenating step is carried out with at least one hydrogenation agent chosen from LiAlH.sub.4, LiH, CaH.sub.2 or LiH which is formed in situ by admixture of LiCl and NaH, and subsequently heating said mixture resulting from the admixture of LiCl and NaH to a temperature in the range of about 60° C. to about 200° C.
17. The process according to claim 7, wherein R is chosen from a C1 to C6 alkyl group, and X is chlorine or bromine.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
EXAMPLES
(3) The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples, without being limited thereto.
General
(4) To obtain the organohydridosilanes as starting materials, the chlorosilanes, in particular, the organochlorosilanes R.sub.3SiCl, R.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 and RSiCl.sub.3 (R=alkyl, aryl, alkenyl) were converted in particular into their corresponding organomono-, di- and trihydridosilanes R.sub.3SiH, R.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and RSiH.sub.3 by hydrogenation (reduction) with conventional reduction agents, such as metal hydrides MH or MH.sub.2, (M=alkali metal, earth alkali metal), or complex metal hydrides (LiAlH.sub.4, NaBH.sub.4, i-Bu.sub.2AlH, etc.) or mixtures thereof in ethers as solvents (e.g. diethyl ether, di-n-butyl ether, diglyme, 1,4-dioxane or mixtures thereof). Because of safety and economic issues, the use of sodium hydride is preferred and attractive, but it reduces chlorosilanes only under drastic conditions, such as high temperatures that are around 250° C. [A. R. Gilbert, G. D. Cooper, R. W. Shade, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 51, 5, 665-668, 1959]. On the other hand, lithium hydride (in diglyme as solvent) reduces chlorosilanes under moderate conditions in high yields [A. N. Kornev, V. V. Semenov, Organomet. Chem. in the USSR 4 (4), 420-422, 1991]. Considering the technically facile recycling of LiH from LiCl in KCl/LiCl melt, the use of lithium hydride is strongly favored for chlorosilane reductions.
(5) Tetrachlorosilane, used as reaction partner for organosilanes to obtain trichlorosilane and organochlorosilanes, is the main byproduct of the Siemens Process including the trichlorosilane production from silicon metal and HCl, and is excessively available on the market. The reactions were performed mixing the reaction partners, i.e. the hydridosilanes (0.1 ml) and SiCl.sub.4 in about 20-50 mol % excess required for the stoichiometric amount, dissolved in diglyme (0.2-0.3 ml) and the hydrogenation catalyst (1-3 w %) in an NMR tube. After cooling the sample with liquid nitrogen (about −196° C.), the tube was evacuated under vacuum (about 0.1 mbar), and sealed to avoid any losses of low boiling monosilanes such as Me.sub.2SiHCl (b.p. 35° C.), MeSiHCl.sub.2 (b.p. 41° C.), Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (b.p. −20° C.), MeSiH.sub.3 (b.p. −58° C.), HSiCl.sub.3 (b.p. 32° C.), H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (b.p. 8° C.), H.sub.3SiCl (b.p. −30° C.) and SiH.sub.4 (b.p. −112° C.). The boiling point of SiCl.sub.4 is 57° C. The boiling point of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 is 70° C. (all b.p. at normal pressure). NMR spectra were recorded depending on reaction time and temperature. For comparison of the catalyst activities each sample was first analyzed NMR-spectroscopically (.sup.29Si— and .sup.1H NMR), either at r.t. after 8 hours or after 2 hours at 80° C. as reaction conditions. In case reduction of SiCl.sub.4 was not completed further heating of the sample was accomplished (the experimental conditions for each experiment are depicted in Table 2). The molar ratios of products formed were determined by integration of relevant NMR signals that were assigned to specific products within the mixture; in case the organosilanes R.sub.3SiH, R.sub.2SiH.sub.2 or RSiH.sub.3 were completely consumed (quantitatively chlorinated), the conversion rate SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3 is defined as 100%; if compounds R.sub.2SiHCl are formed the maximum conversion rate is 50% accordingly.
(6) After optimization and completion of the hydrogenation reaction SiCl.sub.4+SiH.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3+SiCl the NMR tube was opened to analyze the product mixture by GC-MS. Product identification was verified in all cases for the main products.
(7) The amount of products formed can be estimated by the molar ratios as measured by NMR spectroscopy and the amount of starting material applied.
(8) The optimum reaction conditions were evaluated from the NMR experiments and transferred onto the syntheses of HSiCl.sub.3 from tetrachlorosilane with the organosilanes Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, Me.sub.3SiH and PhSiH.sub.3 as hydrogen transfer reagents in preparative scale exemplarily. Even in preparative scale, the tetrachlorosilane reductions were performed in sealed glass ampoules at elevated temperature (80° C.) to avoid evaporation of compounds. NMR experiments as well as those in closed glass ampoules were run in high boiling solvents, such as diglyme, to reduce the overall pressure at elevated temperatures. Polar ethereal solvents are not required, nonpolar solvents (benzene) did not influence the course of reactions; tetrachlorosilane reductions to give HSiCl.sub.3 also work in the absence of any solvent.
(9) The glass ampoules had a length of 150 mm, outer diameter of 50 mm and a wall thickness of 2 mm (internal volume ˜200 ml). For high boiling organosilanes, such as PhSiH.sub.3, reactions can be performed in open systems. This is exemplarily shown in the following section.
Identification of Compounds
(10) Products were analyzed by .sup.1H and .sup.29Si NMR spectroscopy. The spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-500 spectrometer equipped with a Prodigy BBO 500 S1 probe. .sup.1H NMR spectra were calibrated to the residual solvent proton resonance ([D.sub.6]benzene δH=7.16 ppm). Product identification was additionally supported by GC-MS analyses and verified identification of the main products. GC-MS analyses were measured with a Thermo Scientific Trace GC Ultra coupled with an ITQ 900MS mass spectrometer. The stationary phase (Machery-Nagel PERMABOND Silane) had a length of 50 m with an inner diameter of 0.32 mm. 1 μl of analyte solution was injected, 1/25 thereof was transferred onto the column with a flow rate of 1.7 ml/min carried by Helium gas. The temperature of the column was first kept at 50° C. for 10 minutes. Temperature was then elevated at a rate of 20° C./min up to 250° C. and held at that temperature for another 40 minutes. After exiting the column, substances were ionized with 70 eV and cationic fragments were measured within a range of 34-600 m/z (mass per charge). Product mixtures were diluted with benzene prior to the measurement.
(11) .sup.29Si NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants .sup.1J{.sup.29Si—.sup.1H} and .sup.2J{.sup.29Si—.sup.1H} for the starting materials and reaction products formed are listed in Table 1. The spectroscopic and analytical data of starting hydridosilanes and products formed are consistent with published values. The monohydrogenations of tetrachlorosilane performed in sealed NMR tubes, the hydrogenation catalysts used, the SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rates and the molar product distributions are listed in Table 2.
(12) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 .sup.29Si NMR spectroscopic data of mono- and disilanes. δ .sup.29Si .sup.1J.sub.Si—H .sup.2J.sub.Si—H Hydridosilane [ppm] [Hz] [Hz] MeSiH.sub.3 −65.5 194.1 8.0 Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 −38.1 187.6 7.5 Me.sub.3SiH −16.6 182.9 7.0 Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 −23.1 183.8 7.6 iPr.sub.2SiH.sub.2 −8.3 181.6 6.8 PhSiH.sub.3 −60.2 200.0 6.4 Ph.sub.2SiH.sub.2 −33.9 198.2 6.0 PhMeSiH.sub.2 −36.1 193.1 6.9 ViSiH.sub.3 −64.5 198.6 — ViMeSiH.sub.2 −40.5 192.7 — tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2 1.6 181.6 6.2 Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2 −28.8 183.6 — Me.sub.2Si(OEt)H 2.9 199.6 3.5 MeSiHCl.sub.2 10.9 280.1 7.8 Me.sub.2SiHCl 11.0 223.1 7.2 Et.sub.2SiHCl 18.5 216.9 8.0 iPr.sub.2SiHCl 24.1 212.9 7.3 MeSiCl.sub.3 12.8 — 8.6 Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 32.5 — 7.6 Me.sub.3SiCl 31.1 — 7.0 Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 36.4 — — iPr.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 38.2 — — PhSiCl.sub.3 −0.4 — — Ph.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 6.3 — — PhMeSiCl.sub.2 19.3 — 7.3 ViSiCl.sub.3 −3.1 — — ViMeSiCl.sub.2 16.8 — — SiCl.sub.4 −18.5 — — HSiCl.sub.3 −9.1 372.6 — H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 −11.4 292.1 — H.sub.3SiCl −37.6 240.3 — SiH.sub.4 −96.2 202.9 — EtOSiCl.sub.3 −38.9 — — (EtO).sub.2SiCl.sub.2 −56.3 — — (EtO).sub.3SiCl −70.3 — — MeH.sub.2Si—SiH.sub.2Me −67.8 185.8 3.6 Me.sub.2HSi—SiHMe.sub.2 −39.5 177.5 3.3 Me.sub.2HSi.sup.A—Si.sup.BH.sub.2Me −39.9/−66.7 180.9/180.5 — Me.sub.3Si.sup.A—Si.sup.BHMe.sub.2 −19.2/−39.4 —/172.5 — Me.sub.3Si.sup.A—Si.sup.BH.sub.2Me −18.3/−66.0 — — MeCl.sub.2Si—SiCl.sub.2Me 17.6 — — Me.sub.2ClSi—SiClMe.sub.2 17.2 — —
(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Selective conversion of SiCl.sub.4 to HSiCl.sub.3 with organohydridomonosilanes.sup.*). Hydrido- catalyst conv. t/T Hydridosilane SiCl.sub.4 entry silane (1-3 w %) rate.sup.1) (h/° C.) product distribution (mol %) (ml/mmol) (ml/mmol) a MeSiH.sub.3 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (55), MeSiCl.sub.3 (17), SiCl.sub.4 (28) MeSiH.sub.3 (0.04/0.54) 0.31/2.66 b Me.sub.3SiH n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (44), Me.sub.3SiCl (45), SiCl.sub.4 (11) Me.sub.3SiH (0.10/0.86) 0.12/1.05 c Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (55), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (27), SiCl.sub.4 (18) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.10/1.13) 0.35/3.06 d Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 78 8/r.t. HSiCl.sub.3 (31), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (9), Me.sub.2SiHCl (11), SiCl.sub.4 (49) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.05/0.57) 0.23/2.02 100 +2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (40), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (19), SiCl.sub.4 (41) e Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4NCl 66 8/r.t. HSiCl.sub.3 (30), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (7), Me.sub.2SiHCl (15), SiCl.sub.4 (48) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.05/0.57) 0.23/2.02 100 +2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (42), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (20), SiCl.sub.4 (38) f Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.3P 52 8/r.t. HSiCl.sub.3 (19), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (1), Me.sub.2SiHCl (21), SiCl.sub.4 (59) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.05/0.57) 0.23/2.02 100 +2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (32), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (13), Me.sub.2SiHCl (8), SiCl.sub.4 (47) g Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.3N 41 8/r.t. HSiCl.sub.3 (16), Me.sub.2SiHCl (18), SiCl.sub.4 (62), Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (4) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.05/0.57) 0.23/2.02 50 +2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (25), Me.sub.2SiHCl (25), SiCl.sub.4 (50) h Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 97 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (50), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (24), Et.sub.2SiHCl (1), SiCl.sub.4 (30) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.08/0.62) 0.21/1.86 100 +24/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (51), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (25), SiCl.sub.4 (24) i Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4NCl 96 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (52), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (24), Et.sub.2SiHCl (2), SiCl.sub.4 (27) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.08/0.62) 0.21/1.86 100 +24/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (55), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (26), SiCl.sub.4 (19) k Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.3P 56 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (31), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (3), Et.sub.2SiHCl (22), SiCl.sub.4 (45) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.08/0.62) 0.21/1.86 100 +24/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (54), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (24), SiCl.sub.4 (22) l Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.3N 45 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (25), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (24), SiCl.sub.4 (49), Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (2) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.08/0.62) 0.21/1.86 54 +24/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (30), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (2), Et.sub.2SiHCl (24), SiCl.sub.4 (44) m MeSiHCl.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (46), MeSiCl.sub.3 (43), SiCl.sub.4 (11) MeSiHCl.sub.2 (0.10/0.97) 0.15/1.30 n Me.sub.2SiHCl n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (45), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (45), SiCl.sub.4 (10) Me.sub.2SiHCl (0.10/0.9) 0.13/1.13 o PhSiH.sub.3 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (60), PhSiCl.sub.3 (19), SiCl.sub.4 (21) PhSiH.sub.3 (0.05/0.41) 0.20/1.73 p Ph.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (57), Ph.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (26), SiCl.sub.4 (17) Ph.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.10/0.54) 0.18/1.54 q PhMeSiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (58), PhMeSiCl.sub.2 (27), SiCl.sub.4 (15) PhMeSiH.sub.2 (0.07/0.53) 0.17/1.43 r iPr.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 56 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (34), iPr.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (3), iPr.sub.2SiHCl (22), SiCl.sub.4 (41) iPr.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.10/0.63) 0.22/1.89 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 +30/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (50), iPr.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (24), SiCl.sub.4 (26) s.sup.2) Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl none 30/80 no reaction Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.13/0.58) 2.00/1.74 t.sup.3) tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 50 12/120 HSiCl.sub.3 (24), tBu.sub.2SiHCl (26), SiCl.sub.4 (50) tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.10/0.51) 0.17/1.46 u.sup.4) Me.sub.2Si(OEt)H n-Bu.sub.4PCl 20 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (21), Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (51), SiCl.sub.4 (1), EtOSiCl.sub.3 (8), Me.sub.2Si(OEt)H 0.11/0.95 (EtO).sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (7), (EtO).sub.3SiCl (1), X (11) (0.10/0.73) v ViSiH.sub.3 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (60), ViSiCl.sub.3 (18), SiCl.sub.4 (22) ViSiH.sub.3 (0.05/0.57) 0.30/2.61 w ViMeSiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (60), ViMeSiCl.sub.2 (29), SiCl.sub.4 (21) ViMeSiH.sub.2 (0.10/0.94) 0.26/2.30 x Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 n-Bu.sub.4PCl 93 2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (62), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (26), Et.sub.2SiHCl (4), SiCl.sub.4 (8) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (0.10/0.77) 0.20/1.70 100 +2/80 HSiCl.sub.3 (64), Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 (31), SiCl.sub.4 (5) .sup.*)General conditions: excess of SiCl.sub.4 in addition to the stoichiometric amount is favored for full conversion: ~20-50 mol %. In case the SiCl.sub.4 .fwdarw. HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rate was not 100%, the sample was further heated for complete reduction (+ means: in addition to the aforementioned reaction conditions). .sup.1)The conversion rate SiCl.sub.4 .fwdarw. HSiCl.sub.3 is based on full chlorination of the starting organohydridosilane upon monohydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4. In all cases, SiCl.sub.4 is selectively monohydrogenated to give HSiCl.sub.3. In cases of organohydridochlorosilane formation (e.g. R.sub.2SiH.sub.2 + SiCl.sub.4 .fwdarw. HSiCl.sub.3 + R.sub.2SiHCl) the max. conversion rate SiCl.sub.4 .fwdarw. HSiCl.sub.3 is 50%. .sup.2)Obviously due to the sterical demand of the hexyl groups, Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2 does not react with SiCl.sub.4 under the given conditions. .sup.3)Obviously due to the sterical demand of the t-butyl groups, tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2 reacts with SiCl.sub.4 only at 120° C. to give selectively tBu.sub.2SiHCl (SiCl.sub.4 .fwdarw. HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rate: 50%) .sup.4)Excess SiCl.sub.4 is nearly completely consumed by side reactions (ethoxychlorosilane formation). SiCl.sub.4 remained in the reaction mixture in only 1%. X = not identified compound.
(14) As concluded from Table 2, the degree of monohydrogenation of tetrachlorosilane to selectively yielding trichlorosilane is mainly dominated by two factors: first by the steric demand of the organo-substituents at the silicon center of the monosilanes bearing hydrogen as transfer reagent and then by the hydrogenation activity of the catalysts investigated. Methyl-substituted hydridosilanes MeSiH.sub.3, Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and Me.sub.3SiH (entries a-g) start with the hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 already at room temperature (˜25° C.) as listed for Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (entries d-g) showing SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rates between 40% and 80%, finally reacting quantitatively at 80° C. (100%). The experiments of entries d-g) clearly demonstrate a catalytic hydrogenation activity or potential decreasing in the series n-Bu.sub.4PCl≈n-Bu.sub.4NCl>n-Bu.sub.3P>n-Bu.sub.3N. This experimentally enables a facile reaction control to for example synthesize hydridochlorosilanes (R.sub.2SiHCl) apart from trichlorosilane (entries e-g) at room temperature or, alternatively, to produce the fully chlorinated methylsilanes (entries a-c) under moderate conditions (2 h/80° C.). The experiments of series e-g clearly show the hydridosilane chlorination to happen stepwise. Noteworthy, in no experiment a double hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 to yield dichlorosilane, H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2, was detected, the hydrodechlorination of tetrachlorosilane to give trichlorosilane is extraordinary selective. Comparable trends are recorded for diethylsilane, Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (entries h-l), already showing the increased steric demand of ethyl groups compared to the methyl-substituents: Even after 26 h reaction time at 80° C. reaction temperature Et.sub.2SiHCl is nearly quantitatively formed under n-Bu.sub.3N-catalysis (conversion rate SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 54%, entry l) while Me.sub.2SiHCl was formed from Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 already after 2 h/80° C. (entry g). As expected, use of n-Bu.sub.4NCl or n-Bu.sub.4PCl as catalyst gave a conversion rate of 100% with full chlorination of the dihydridosilane (entries h and i). Considering the stepwise chlorination of methylsilanes (entries a, c, d) with tetrachlorosilane, it was expected that the methylchlorosilanes MeSiHCl.sub.2 and Me.sub.2SiHCl give trichlorosilane and the respective methylchlorosilanes quantitatively under n-Bu.sub.4PCl catalysis—the experimental proof is depicted in the Table 2 (entries m and n). The steric demand of vinyl- and the planar phenyl-substituents at silicon is comparably low, the experiments showed no steric hindrance of the SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 transformation: The phenylsilanes (entries o-q) and vinylsilanes (entries v and w) were fully chlorinated by SiCl.sub.4 to give conversion rates SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 of 100%. The increasing steric demand of isopropyl groups at silicon was convincingly demonstrated for iPr.sub.2SiH.sub.2 that gave a SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rate of 56% (2 h/80° C.) mainly giving iPr.sub.2SiHCl as counterpart. Prolonged reaction time of 32 h yielded the Pr.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 quantitatively (entry r). The same counts for tBu.sub.2SiH.sub.2 that started to react only at 120° C. to give tBu.sub.2SiHCl after 12 h quantitatively (SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversion rate 50%, entry t). Even more, Hex.sub.2SiH.sub.2 did not show any hydrogenation activity at all (entry s), it completely prevents SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversion. The very sensitive ethoxy-substituent of Me.sub.2Si(OEt)H caused side reactions with excess tetrachlorosilane to give ethoxychlorosilanes (EtO).sub.nSiCl.sub.4-n (n=1-3) as side products, but SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversion was 20% (entry u). The experiment of entry x demonstrates that excess SiCl.sub.4 is not required for monohydrogenation to yield HSiCl.sub.3 (conversion rates SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 97% (entry h) vs 93% but increasing to 100% after 4 h/80° C. The main factor for product formation is determined by the stoichiometry of the reaction partners.
(15) A) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and SiCl.sub.4 in Preparative Scale
(16) a) Synthesis of Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 by reduction of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 with LiH in THF
(17) In a 250 ml three-necked flask equipped with a dropping funnel, reflux condenser and a magnetic stirrer were placed 7.22 g (0.88 mol, 97%) lithium hydride (LiH), suspended in 100 ml of thoroughly dried tetrahydrofurane (THF) under an inert nitrogen atmosphere. The THF/LiH suspension was carefully scaled from oxygen/air by degassing in vacuo and refilling with gaseous nitrogen to establish inert conditions. To the vigorously stirred suspension 56.84 g (53.6 ml, 0.44 mol) of dimethyldichlorosilane (Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2) were slowly added over the dropping funnel. Upon addition, the reduction of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 started after an induction period of 5 minutes with self-heating of the solution to about 54° C. Dimethylsilane (Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, b.p.: −20° C.), formed continuously, evaporated and was frozen in a cooling trap (−196° C.) which was connected with the top of the reflux condenser. After Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 addition was completed (1 h, final temperature 50° C.), the mixture was subsequently heated to reflux (75° C. oil bath temperature) for an additional hour and then cooled down to r.t. To completely collect Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 in the cooling trap, the reaction flask was applied to vacuum and the product was pumped off. Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 inside the cooling trap was separated from THF by low temperature distillation and was isolated in 96% yield (25.4 g, 0.42 mol). Formed LiCl was isolated in 36.05 g (96% conversion of LiH into LiCl; theoretical yield after 100% conversion: 37.56 g) by removal of THF and remaining silanes in vacuo at 160° C., which is in line with the amount of formed Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2.
(18) b) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3
(19) A glass ampoule (length: 15 cm, inner diameter: 5 cm, wall thickness: 2 mm) was evacuated in vacuo and subsequently filled with gaseous nitrogen to create an inert atmosphere. Then, 96.6 g (0.57 mol) SiCl.sub.4, 2.15 g (0.007 mol, 2 w %) n-Bu.sub.4PCl and 43 ml (39.63 g) diglyme were filled into the ampoule that was frozen at −196° C. (liquid N.sub.2) and evacuated in vacuo. 13.58 g (0.23 mol) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 were added by low temperature condensation. Subsequently the ampoule was sealed, warmed to r.t. (25° C.) and heated to 80° C. for 5 h. After completion the reaction mixture was frozen (−196° C.) and the ampoule opened under an inert atmosphere. Volatile products were condensed into a flask that was connected to a Vigreux column (50 cm) and a distillery, which was connected to a cooling trap (−196° C.) to possibly collect unreacted Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2. The distillation condenser was cooled to 8° C. with a cryostat, the product receiving flask was cooled to −10° C. (HSiCl.sub.3 b.p.: 32° C.) to reduce losses of HSiCl.sub.3. Careful fractional distillation at normal pressure gave a first fraction containing 37 g of HSiCl.sub.3 besides 6 g of SiCl.sub.4 and 4 g of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2. The second fraction consisted of 22 g HSiCl.sub.3, 15 g of SiCl.sub.4 and 22 g of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2. 2 g of Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 remained in the residue. Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 was completely consumed. After a second distillation step HSiCl.sub.3 was isolated in an excellent isolated yield: 57 g (0.42 mol), 93% related to the molar amount of Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 reacted.
(20) B) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from Me.sub.3SiH and SiCl.sub.4 in Preparative Scale
(21) a) Synthesis of Me.sub.3SiH by reduction of Me.sub.3SiCl with LiH in Diglyme
(22) As described for the synthesis of Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, 34.00 g (0.31 mol) Me.sub.3SiCl were reacted with 2.50 g LiH (0.31 mol). After completion of the chlorosilane reduction and collection of Me.sub.3SiH together with some diglyme in the cooling trap, trimethylsilane was isolated by low temperature distillation in 97% yield (b.p. 6.7° C., 22.5 g, 0.30 mol). Formed LiCl was isolated in 12.94 g (97% conversion of LiH into LiCl; theoretical yield after 100% conversion: 13.26 g) by removal of diglyme and remaining silanes in vacuo at 160° C., which is in line with the amount of formed Me.sub.3SiH.
(23) b) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 In analogy to the HSiCl.sub.3 synthesis with Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 as hydrogenation agent, 12.34 g (0.17 mol) Me.sub.3SiH, SiCl.sub.4 (35.1 g, 0.21 mol), 0.5 g n-Bu.sub.4PCl (1.7 mmol, 1.0 w %) and 20 ml diglyme were reacted in a sealed glass ampoule at 80° C. for 14 h. The .sup.29Si NMR analysis of the product mixture before work up showed full conversion of tetrachloro-into trichlorosilane (100%) with no remaining Me.sub.3SiH. The molar ratio Me.sub.3SiCl/HSiCl.sub.3/SiCl.sub.4 was 45/43/12. Careful fractional distillation (50 cm Vigreux column, distillation condenser: 8° C.) gave HSiCl.sub.3 in 97% (21.78 g, 0.16 mol) related to the molar amount of Me.sub.3SiH reacted. Boiling points: HSiCl.sub.3 32° C., Me.sub.3SiCl 57° C.
(24) C) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from PhSiH.sub.3 and SiCl.sub.4 in Preparative Scale, Open System
(25) The reaction of PhSiH.sub.3 with SiCl.sub.4 for the synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 was performed in an open system. In a two necked Schlenk-flask equipped with a reflux condenser (cooling temperature 27° C.) and a dropping funnel were admixed 72.19 g (424.9 mmol) SiCl.sub.4, 52 ml diglyme and 0.54 g (1.8 mmol) n-Bu.sub.4PCl under an inert N.sub.2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux (oil bath temperature 80° C.) and 9.50 g (87.8 mmol) of PhSiH.sub.3 were slowly added via the dropping funnel. After addition was completed (30 min), the reaction mixture was heated to reflux (oil bath temperature 80° C.) for additional 4 hours. During the heating period HSiCl.sub.3 continuously condensed in a cooling trap (−196° C.) that was connected with the reflux condenser. Subsequently, the product mixture was frozen (−196° C.), the reaction system evacuated and upon warming to room temperature all volatiles condensed into the cooling trap. After condensation was completed, all volatiles inside the cooling trap were condensed into a glass ampoule (−196° C., 59.44 g) with attached NMR tube. The glass ampoule was sealed in vacuo, warmed to r.t. and 0.5 ml of the product mixture were poured into the attached NMR tube. The NMR tube was disconnected from the glass ampoule and the condensed reaction products (Table 3) as well as the remaining residue within the reaction flask were investigated by .sup.1H and .sup.29Si NMR spectroscopy.
(26) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Condensed product mixture (59.44 g) collected in the glass ampoule. compound mol % mmol g HSiCl.sub.3 60.3 246.1 33.34 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 4.0 16.2 1.64 SiCl.sub.4 33.6 137.0 23.28 diglyme 2.1 8.8 1.18
(27) PhSiH.sub.3 was fully perchlorinated to give PhSiCl.sub.3 that remained in the reaction flask. The corresponding conversion rate of SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3/H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 was 100%; the molar ratio of HSiCl.sub.3/H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 was 94/6.
(28) D) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 and Me.sub.2SiHCl in Preparative Scale
(29) In analogy to the HSiCl.sub.3 synthesis with Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 as hydrogenation agent in B), 6.62 g (0.11 mol) Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2, SiCl.sub.4 (38.12 g, 0.22 mol), 0.5 g n-Bu.sub.3N (3.4 mmol, 1.4 w %) and 20 ml diglyme were reacted in a sealed glass ampoule with attached NMR tube at 80° C. for 4 h. After the sample was cooled to r.t., 0.5 ml of the product mixture was poured into the NMR tube, the NMR tube was sealed and products formed were analyzed NMR spectroscopically. The.sup.29Si NMR analysis of the product mixture is depicted in Table 4 (yields in mol %).
(30) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 with Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2. silane 4 h/80° C. Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 2 Me.sub.2SiHCl 34 SiCl.sub.4 34 HSiCl.sub.3 29 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 1
(31) The product mixture was subsequently heated for additional 2 hours at 80° C. to complete conversion of Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 to Me.sub.2SiHCl. Then the product mixture was frozen with liquid nitrogen (−196° C.), opened and all volatile compounds were pumped off into a cooling trap (−196° C.). Due to very similar boiling points of the targeted products HSiCl.sub.3 and Me.sub.2SiHCl (32° C. vs 35° C.), further separation was not possible with the distillation equipment available and therefore disregarded. The product distribution of the collected volatiles (35.4 g) was investigated by .sup.1H and .sup.29Si NMR analyses and is depicted in Table 5. Small amounts of SiCl.sub.4 remained in the residue.
(32) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Product distribution of the volatiles collected in the cooling trap. silane mol % mol g Me.sub.2SiHCl 38 0.10 9.8 SiCl.sub.4 27 0.07 13.6 HSiCl.sub.3 35 0.10 12.0
(33) The conversion rate SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 is 45%. Related to a quantitative reaction with a conversion rate of 50% the overall yield of product formation is 91%.
(34) E) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and SiCl.sub.4 Under LiCl and KCl Catalysis
(35) 0.08 ml (0.62 mmol) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2, 0.17 ml SiCl.sub.4 (1.45 mmol), 0.3 ml diglyme and 0.05 ml C.sub.6D.sub.6 were admixed together with catalytic amounts of lithium chloride or potassium chloride (0.10 mmol), respectively, in an NMR tube. The NMR tubes were cooled to −196° C., evacuated and sealed. The samples were heated and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy, according to Table 6.
(36) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 LiCl and KCl catalyzed reaction of Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and SiCl.sub.4. LiCl catalysis KCl catalysis 80° C. 120° C. 120° C. 80° C. 120° C. 120° C. silane 4 h +18 h +36 h 4 h +18 h +36 h Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 29 8 — 31 31 28 Et.sub.2SiHCl 3 20 28 — — 3 SiCl.sub.4 65 54 44 69 69 66 HSiCl.sub.3 3 20 28 — — 3 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 — <1 <<1 — — —
(37) In case of the LiCl catalysis no Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 remained after a reaction time of 54 h at 120° C. Et.sub.2SiHCl was formed upon Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 monochlorination selectively; the conversion rate SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3 was 50% accordingly. Dichlorosilane formed only in traces.
(38) Under comparable conditions HSiCl.sub.3 and Et.sub.2SiHCl formed only in 3% by replacement of LiCl against KCl, thus characterizing LiCl as the much more powerful hydrogenation catalyst; but the catalyst activity of LiCl is less compared to ammonium- and phosphonium chlorides and phosphines and amines.
(39) F) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from Methyihydridodisilanes and SiCl.sub.4
(40) F1) 0.1 ml (0.61 mmol) Me.sub.2HSi—SiHMe.sub.2, 0.21 ml SiCl.sub.4 (1.8 mmol), 0.3 ml diglyme and 0.05 ml C.sub.6D.sub.6 were admixed with catalytic amounts of phosphonium chloride (0.02 mmol) in an NMR tube. The NMR tube was cooled to −196° C., evacuated and sealed. The sample was heated for 4 hours at 80° C. and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy (Table 7).
(41) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Product distribution of the reaction of tetramethyldisilane with SiCl.sub.4. silane mol % HSiCl.sub.3 52 (Me.sub.2ClSi).sub.2 24 SiCI.sub.4 24
(42) This example clearly proves tetramethyldisilane as hydrogen shuttle to selectively monodehalogenate tetrachlorosilane to yield pure trichlorosilane (conversion rate SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3: 100%). Organochlorodisilanes R.sub.nSi.sub.2Cl.sub.6-n (n=1-5, R=organo-substituent) generally have much higher boiling points compared to the corresponding monosilanes. Thus, this process will strongly diminish the separation problems organochlorosilane/trichlorosilane by conventional distillation procedures. As the reaction conditions required for tetrachlorosilane monoreduction are comparably smooth, no disilane cleavage (for n=4-5) is performed with the hydrogenation catalyst—recycling of methylchlorodisilanes thus is preparatively facile by conventional reductions (in case of tetramethyldichlorosilane even LiH is suitable for the quantitative formation of the dihydridosubsituted disilane), making this process route very attractive for practical and industrial use.
(43) F2 a) 0.05 ml (0.4 mmol) MeH.sub.2Si—SiH.sub.2Me, 0.4 ml SiCl.sub.4 (3.5 mmol), 0.3 ml diglyme and 0.05 ml C.sub.6D.sub.6 were admixed with catalytic amounts of phosphonium chloride (0.02 mmol) in an NMR tube. The NMR tube was cooled to −196° C., evacuated and sealed. The sample was left at r.t. for 15 h and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy (Table 8).
(44) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Product distribution of the reaction of dimethyldisilane with SiCl.sub.4 at r.t. silane mol %* mol %** HSiCl.sub.3 37 68 SiCl.sub.4 46 — MeSiCl.sub.3 6 12 MeSiHCl.sub.2 7 13 MeSiH.sub.2Cl 1 2 SiH.sub.4 1 2 Me.sub.2Si.sub.2Cl.sub.4 2 3 *including SiCl.sub.4, **without SiCl.sub.4
(45) As concluded from Table 8 that contains the product distribution in mol % including both, excess SiCl.sub.4 and without SiCl.sub.4, HSiCl.sub.3 was formed in 37% (68%) already at r.t. (15 h), while dimethyltetrachlorodisilane was formed in 2 mol %* (3 mol %)**. Thus, disilane cleavage under phosphonium chloride catalysis to yield MeSiCl.sub.3 and MeSiHCl.sub.2 is detectable already under smooth conditions. While SiH.sub.4 is formed in 1 mol %* (2 mol %)**, notably, mono- and dichlorosilane was not formed at all. This proves the dimethyldisilane as hydrogen transfer reagent to reduce SiCl.sub.4 with simultaneous disilane cleavage to yield MeSiCl.sub.3 and MeSiHCl.sub.2. From a comparable control experiment reacting an authentic sample of dimethyldisilane with catalytic amounts of n-Bu.sub.4PCl at r.t. to 50° C., methylsilane MeSiH.sub.3 (besides some oligosilanes) is formed quantitatively. This compound is not detected in the product mixture, but according to Table 2, entry a), methylsilane quantitatively reduces SiCl.sub.4 to give HSiCl.sub.3 and MeSiCl.sub.3.
(46) F2 b) A comparable sample to F2 b) [0.05 ml (0.4 mmol) MeH.sub.2Si—SiH.sub.2Me, 0.4 ml SiCl.sub.4 (3.5 mmol), 0.3 ml diglyme, 0.05 ml C.sub.6D.sub.6 and catalytic amounts of phosphonium chloride (0.02 mmol)] was heated for 12 hours at 80° C. and the products formed analyzed by NMR spectroscopy (Table 9). The product distribution is listed in mol %, again, with excess SiCl.sub.4 and without SiCl.sub.4.
(47) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Product distribution of the reaction of dimethyldisilane with SiCl.sub.4 at 80 °C. silane mol %* mol %** HSiCl.sub.3 38.7 69.5 SiCl.sub.4 44.4 — MeSiCl.sub.3 13.4 24.2 MeSiHCl.sub.2 3.5 6.3 *including SiCl.sub.4, **without SiCl.sub.4
(48) F3) 0.07 ml of a methylhydridodisilane mixture (disilane distribution as depicted in Table 10), 0.21 ml SiCl.sub.4 (1.8 mmol), 0.3 ml diglyme and 0.05 ml C.sub.6D.sub.6 were admixed together with catalytic amounts of phosphonium chloride (0.02 mmol) in an NMR tube. The NMR tube was cooled to −196° C., evacuated and sealed. The sample was heated for 4 hours at 80° C. and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy (Table 11).
(49) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Disilane distribution of the starting disilane mixture. silane mol % (MeH.sub.2Si).sub.2 43 (Me.sub.2HSi).sub.2 31 MeH.sub.2Si—SiHMe.sub.2 19 Me.sub.3Si—SiHMe.sub.2 5 Me.sub.3Si—SiH.sub.2Me 2
(50) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Product distribution of the reaction of a disilane mixture with SiCl.sub.4 silane mol % HSiCl.sub.3 52 SiCl.sub.4 16 MeSiCl.sub.3 15 MeSiHCl.sub.2 6 (Me.sub.2ClSi).sub.2 4 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 4 Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 3
(51) The experiment described under F3) unambiguously links together the Müller-Rochow-Direct Process for methylchlorosilane production (Si+MeCI/Cu cat./350° C..fwdarw.Me.sub.nSiCl.sub.4-n (n=1-3)) and the Siemens Process for silicon deposition. Considering the Direct Process Residue consisting of methylchlorodisilanes Me.sub.nSi.sub.2Cl.sub.6-n (n=2-6) that needs to be recycled into valuable monosilanes under smooth reaction conditions for improving economic benefit and to reduce environmental pollution, it is suggested to (i) transfer the methylchlorodisilanes into their methylhydrido substituted congeners by conventional reduction routes (e.g. with LiAlH.sub.4 with retention of the disilane skeleton or with LiH and simultaneous cleavage of highly chlorinated disilanes Me.sub.nSi.sub.2Cl.sub.6-n (n<4) into the corresponding hydrido-substituted monosilanes and (i) the addition of excess SiCl.sub.4 to the hydrido-(di)-silane mixture. Simultaneous disilane cleavage/SiCl.sub.4 reduction and methylchlorosilane formation (as exemplarily depicted in Table 11) gives most valuable monosilanes in excellent yields, e.g. HSiCl.sub.3 besides MeSiHCl.sub.2.
(52) All experiments performed and listed in Table 2 as well as the syntheses of trichlorosilane in preparative scales were run according to the stoichiometric requirements for a defined product formation. As mentioned earlier, the transformation of tetrachlorosilane into trichlorosilane occurred in an excellent selectivity regarding the monohydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 that was mostly used in a molar excess of 20-50% to prevent higher degrees of hydrogenation forming di- and/or monochlorosilanes. The SiCl.sub.4 hydrogenation with Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 (Table 2, entry x) clearly shows that the high molar excess of SiCl.sub.4 is not necessary for HSiCl.sub.3 formation. The excess used in our experiments was caused by safety requirements to prevent the principally possible formation of explosive monosilane, SiH.sub.4, by full hydrogenation of tetrachlorosilane. The low boiling points of especially H.sub.3SiCl (−30° C.) and SiH.sub.4 (−112° C.) could have caused explosions of the glass ampoules or—even worse—the NMR tubes during measurements.
(53) G) One Step Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from SiCl.sub.4 Under n-Bu.sub.4PCl Catalysis
(54) Tetrachlorosilane (0.4 ml), diglyme (0.3 ml), C.sub.6D.sub.6 (0.05 ml) and n-Bu.sub.4PCl (1 w %) were filled with a substoichiometric amount of lithium hydride (LiH, 4.3 mg) in an NMR tube under inert conditions. The reaction mixture was frozen (liquid N.sub.2, −196° C.), evacuated and the NMR tube sealed in vacuo. After warming to r.t. the sample was heated to 100° C. for 10 h. The .sup.29Si NMR analysis proved selective formation of HSiCl.sub.3 (conversion rate SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3=100%). The molar ratio SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 was 85/15. Notably, formation of hydridosilanes H.sub.nSiCl.sub.4-n (n=2-4) could not been detected, but should have been expected. Monosilane formation from SiCl.sub.4 and LiH (W. Sundermeyer, DE1080077, 1957; W. Sundermeyer, L. M. Litz, Chem. Ing. Tech 1965, 37, 14-18; H. J. Klockner, M. Eschwey, Chem. Ing. Tech. 1988, 60, 815-821) gives the perhydrogenated silane lacking any selectivity. Thus, in our case SiH.sub.4 (in situ formed) reduces excess SiCl.sub.4 to give HSiCl.sub.3 selectively.
(55) H) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from SiCl.sub.4 with Pentachlorodisilane (PCDS, HSi.sub.2Cl.sub.5) with Different Catalysts
(56) Tetrachlorosilane (0.2 ml), pentachlorodisilane (0.2 ml), diglyme (0.2 ml) and C.sub.6D.sub.6 (0.05 ml) were admixed with different catalysts (0.02 mol) (as depicted in Table 12) in an NMR tube under inert conditions. The reaction mixtures were frozen (liquid N.sub.2, −196° C.), evacuated and the NMR tubes sealed in vacuo. After letting the samples reach r.t. they were heated to 80° C. for 10 h. The results of the .sup.29Si NMR analyses are depicted in Table 12.
(57) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 with PCDS. SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 molar ratio silane catalyst conversion rate SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 PCDS n-Bu.sub.4PCl 100% 65/35 n-Bu.sub.3P 100% 63/37 n-Bu.sub.3N 100% 65/35
(58) In all experiments SiCl.sub.4-monoreduction was selective with conversion rates SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 of 100%. Chlorination of PCDS should yield hexachlorodisilane (Si.sub.2Cl.sub.6) that is subsequently cleaved to give tetrachlorosilane, SiCl.sub.4, by the catalysts used (C. J. Wilkins, J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 3409-3412; J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1964, 26, 409-414; J. Tillmann, H.-W. Lerner, M. Wagner, DE102015105501A1, 2016) for reduction.
(59) I) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from SiCl.sub.4 and Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 in the Presence of nBu.sub.4PCl and Benzene as Solvent
(60) For a detailed study about the role of stoichiometry in the monoreduction of tetrachlorosilane a set of experiments was performed. Exemplarily, Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 was reacted with SiCl.sub.4 to give HSiCl.sub.3 and Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 in C.sub.6D.sub.6 as solvent and under nBu.sub.4PCl catalysis. According to the stoichiometry required for quantitative reactions, in experiment a) SiCl.sub.4 and Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 were reacted in a molar ratio of 2:1, in b) SiCl.sub.4 was reacted in about 6 mol % excess and in experiment c) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 was used in 12 mol % excess for preparation of HSiCl.sub.3. The experiments were performed in sealed NMR tubes and controlled NMR spectroscopically with increasing reaction temperatures and times. The results obtained are depicted in Table 12.
(61) Preparation of a stock solution: 1.00 ml (7.7 mmol) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 were admixed with 1.80 ml (15.5 mmol) SiCl.sub.4 and 2.8 ml benzene as solvent.
(62) In the first of three competitive experiments, 0.6 ml of the stock solution and catalytic amounts of nBu.sub.4PCl (5 wt %) were admixed in an NMR tube that was cooled to −196° C. The NMR tube was evacuated and sealed (exp. a). In the second experiment (analogously prepared to exp. a), 0.1 mmol of SiCl.sub.4 (b) and in the third experiment 0.1 mmol of Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 were additionally added. The three samples were heated to 80° C. and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy after 3, 6 and 30 h reaction time, respectively (Table 13).
(63) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 12 Selective conversion of SiCl.sub.4 to HSiCl.sub.3 with Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and benzene as solvent. a b (+SiCl.sub.4) c (+Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2) 3 h, 6 h, 30 h, 3 h, 6 h, 30 h, 3 h, 6 h, 30 h, silane 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. 80° C. HSiCl.sub.3 56.7 59.7 61.9 56.8 60.6 61.6 59.9 58.2 58.2 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 3.0 5.8 6.0 2.8 4.1 4.2 8.5 10.0 9.1 Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 18.3 24.0 25.9 18.9 23.8 25.1 26.7 27.6 28.5 Et.sub.2SiHCl 9.2 2.5 — 6.9 1.4 — — — — SiCl.sub.4 12.9 8.1 6.2 14.6 10.1 9.1 4.9 4.2 4.2 ratio HSiCl.sub.3/ 95/5 91/9 91/9 95/5 94/6 94/6 88/12 85/15 86/14 H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2
(64) As expected, reacting equimolar amounts of Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and SiCl.sub.4 (exp. a) the final molar ratio HSiCl.sub.3/H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 was 91/9 with still 6 mol % of SiCl.sub.4 remaining. With excess SiCl.sub.4 (exp. b) the final ratio HSiCl.sub.3/H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 was 94/6 and with excess hydridosilane the HSiCl.sub.3/H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 ratio was the lowest being 86/14. The series of experiments indeed prove that an increasing molar excess of SiCl.sub.4 dominantly prevents double or even threefold hydrogenation and thus increases the SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3 selectivity and conversion rates experimentally. Notably, comparable trends were formed running the experiments in diglyme as solvent.
(65) J) Synthesis of HSiCl.sub.3 from SiCl.sub.4, Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and nBu.sub.4PCl (without Solvent)
(66) 0.6 ml (5.2 mmol) SiCl.sub.4 were admixed with 0.17 ml (1.3 mmol) Et.sub.2SiH.sub.2 and 0.05 g (0.17 mmol) nBu.sub.4PCl in an NMR tube. The NMR tube was cooled to −196° C., evacuated and sealed. The sample was heated to 80° C. for 5 h and analyzed NMR spectroscopically. The product mixture consisted of 32.8% HSiCl.sub.3, 45.9% SiCl.sub.4, 11.7% Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2, 9.3% Et.sub.2SiHCl and 0.3% H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2. Further heating of the sample at 80° C. (additional 7 h) gave 42.0% HSiCl.sub.3, 36.6% SiCl.sub.4, 20.8% Et.sub.2SiCl.sub.2, and 0.6% H.sub.2SiCl.sub.2.
(67) Advantages of the Invention
(68) 1) Products formed can be separated by distillation at normal pressure considering the boiling points:
(69) HSiCl.sub.3 b.p. 32° C., Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 b.p. 70° C., MeSiCl.sub.3 b.p. 60° C., Me.sub.3SiCl b.p. 57° C., Me.sub.2SiHCl b.p. 35° C.
(70) 2) Reactants such as Me.sub.nSiCl.sub.4-n (n=1-3) and SiCl.sub.4 are liquids that can be easily purified by conventional distillation—often SiCl.sub.4 is already hyper pure from the Siemens Process—thus, HSiCl.sub.3 obtained is highly pure. As HSiCl.sub.3 quality in the technical process is strongly dependent from grain size and impurities, higher qualities are easily obtained from pre-cleaned starting materials.
(71) 3) SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3 conversions conventionally worked at high temperatures (˜1000° C.) or under metal silicide catalysis (600° C.) and conversion rates of about 20% and 4-7%, respectively. The process claimed is by far energy saving (see Table 2, reactions at r.t..fwdarw.80° C., some hours) and is characterized by extremely high conversion rates SiCl.sub.4/HSiCl.sub.3.
(72) 4) The “hydrogen shuttles” Me.sub.nSiH.sub.4-n (n=1-3) are easily available for silicon consuming companies running the Müller Rochow Direct Process (Si+MeCl (Cu cat., ΔT).fwdarw.Me.sub.nSiCl.sub.4-n, n=1-3; n=2: ˜90%). This is especially true for the main product Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2.
(73) 5) Hydrogenation of Me.sub.nSiCl.sub.4, (n=1-3) is possible with all common reducing agents, such as alkaline and earth alkaline hydrides or complex metal hydrides, e.g. LiAlH.sub.4 or NaBH.sub.4. Most preferred is LiH, reductions are performed quantitatively (A. N. Kornev, V. V. Semenov, Metalloorg. Khim. 1991, 4, 860-863). LiCl formed by chlorosilane reductions is simply recycled in a LiCl/KCl melt electrolysis to give Li metal that is reacted with hydrogen gas at elevated temperatures to give LiH. Summarizing the Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2.fwdarw.Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2.fwdarw.Me.sub.2SiCl.sub.2 cycle, Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2 is the hydrogen shuttle that is not consumed but easily recycled. LiH (or other reducing agents) are the “real” agents for monohydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.HSiCl.sub.3, otherwise impossible to perform.
(74) 6) The stepwise chlorination of hydridosilanes RSiH.sub.3 and R.sub.2SiH.sub.2, which is dependent from the reaction conditions and the hydrogenation catalysts used (see Table 2) allows the simultaneous formation of organochlorosilanes RSiHCl.sub.2 and especially Me.sub.2SiHCl. In no cases “triple” hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 into H.sub.3SiCl is observed; never the explosive SiH.sub.4 formed (like e.g. in redistribution reactions of HSiCl.sub.3 or hydrogenation of SiCl.sub.4 with tin hydrides). Thus, a reaction
Me.sub.2SiH.sub.2+SiCl.sub.4.fwdarw.Me.sub.2SiHCl+HSiCl.sub.3
is of high economic value. This process is highly economical and can be used in the silicone industry as well as for silicon deposition. As most of the silicon consuming companies are running both Direct Processes (Müller Rochow and Siemens) the process might be easily included into the major product streams. Additionally, all the included consumers are well equipped with highly developed distillation equipment to pre-purify the starting materials for production of highly pure products, e.g. HSiCl.sub.3 and Me.sub.2SiHCl.