Systems and methods for dry storage and/or transport of consolidated nuclear spent fuel rods
10438710 ยท 2019-10-08
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G21F5/10
PHYSICS
International classification
G21C19/00
PHYSICS
Abstract
In one embodiment, a system and method for dry storage comprises removing spent fuel rods from their fuel rod assemblies and placing the freed fuel rods in a storage cell of a dry storage canister with a high packing density and without a neutron absorber material present.
Claims
1. A dry storage canister for storing spent nuclear fuel rods, the canister comprising: an elongated outer housing having a first end and a second end; and an elongated internal basket provided within the outer housing, the elongated internal basket extending in a region between the first end and the second end of the elongated outer housing, the internal basket having a plurality of separate elongated storage cells, each of the cells comprising a plurality of the spent nuclear fuel rods that have been separated from their respective fuel rod assemblies, the plurality of the spent nuclear fuel rods having a rod packing density of approximately 4 to 6 of the spent nuclear fuel rods per square inch.
2. The canister of claim 1, wherein the spent nuclear fuel rods are contiguous within each of the cells.
3. The canister of claim 1, wherein the outer housing is an elongated cylindrical housing.
4. The canister of claim 1, wherein the internal basket is made of a metal material having a high thermal conductivity.
5. The canister of claim 1, wherein the internal basket is made of one or more of carbon steel, aluminum, or copper.
6. The canister of claim 1, wherein the internal basket comprises multiple tubes that define the storage cells.
7. The canister of claim 1, further comprising a cask in which the canister is placed.
8. The canister of claim 1, wherein does not include any neutron absorbing material.
9. A dry storage canister for storing spent nuclear fuel rods that have been separated from their fuel rod assemblies, the canister comprising: the spent nuclear fuel rods that have been separated from their fuel rod assemblies and that have been packed together with a rod packing density of approximately 4 to 6 of the spent nuclear fuel rods per square inch; and means for housing the spent nuclear fuel rods, wherein the means for housing does not include any neutron absorbing material.
10. The canister of claim 9, wherein the canister further comprises multiple tubes.
11. The canister of claim 9, wherein the spent nuclear fuel rods that have been separated from their fuel rod assemblies are contiguous within each of the cells.
12. The canister of claim 9, further comprising a central tube.
13. The canister of claim 9, further comprising a central tube that provides a space for a drain tube to drain the canister of a neutron moderator.
14. The canister of claim 1, wherein the elongated internal basket comprises a central tube.
15. The canister of claim 1, wherein the elongated internal basket comprises a central tube that provides space for a drain tube to drain the canister of a neutron moderator.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(11) As described above, it would be desirable to have a transportable dry storage system and method that have higher spent fuel storage capacity and/or that remove the need for expensive neutron absorber materials. Examples of such systems and methods are described in the following disclosure. In some embodiments, spent fuel rods are separated from their fuel rod assemblies and the freed rods are placed within a dry storage canister that, for example, can be placed in a storage or transport cask or in a repository. Because the fuel rods are separated from the fuel rod assembly, the rods can be placed within the storage canister with a much higher packing density. As a consequence, there is less space between the rods and, therefore, less danger of the system reaching nuclear criticality if a neutron moderator such as water were to enter the canister. Because of this, there is no need to provide expensive neutron absorber material within the canister. Furthermore, because of the limited open spacing, there is minimal risk for the rods to become geometrically reconfigured within the canister, a desirable feature when analyzing transport accident conditions to meet regulatory requirements.
(12) In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
(13) As described above, in order to satisfy federal safety requirements, fuel rod assemblies are typically placed within cylindrical canisters along with expensive neutron absorber material, resulting in low spent fuel storage capacity and high costs. An alternative way to satisfy such requirements is to package spent fuel in a manner in which there are few voids between the rods that a neutron moderator material, such as water, can fill so as to reduce the potential for nuclear criticality. Accordingly, neutron absorber material is unnecessary. In addition to increasing spent fuel storage capacity and removing the need for expensive neutron absorber material, such a design may enable credits to be awarded for the effects of burnup on the nuclear fuel to decrease criticality. As nuclear fuel is used, it builds up fission products that reduce its capability to support a self-sustaining chain reaction. This process is referred to as burnup and it is measured in terms of megawatt days per ton. Once burnup is sufficient to prevent further power development, the fuel is typically termed spent fuel. Possible credits could include (a) a reasonable credit for reduction in the amount of effective fissile material content of the fuel, resulting from that material being consumed by protracted fissioning during power operations, (b) a reasonable credit for effective neutron absorption by the actinides that are present in the spent fuel, and (c) a reasonable credit for effective neutron absorption by the fission products that are present in the spent fuel.
(14) One way of achieving the above-described goals is to remove spent fuel rods from their fuel rod assemblies and place the freed rods within a dry storage canister with very little space between the rods. Doing this provides several benefits. First, the spent fuel rods will have a higher packing density within the canister and therefore a higher storage capacity can be obtained. In addition, because there is very little space between the rods, the risks associated with ingress of water or another neutron moderator are reduced and no expensive neutron absorber material is required. Furthermore, because there is less risk associated with nuclear criticality in the event of compromise of the canister, the canister can be made of relatively inexpensive materials.
(15) When increasing the packing density in this manner, steps can be taken to ensure that the heat generated by the spent fuel rods is dissipated, especially from the center of the canister, which is farthest from the canister walls.
(16)
(17) As shown in
(18) The various components of the internal basket 14, including the central tube 20, the divider walls 22, and the end walls 24, can be made of a metal or alloy materials having high thermal conductivity (e.g., 200 to 380 W/(m.Math.k)). Example materials include aluminum alloys and copper. When the spent fuel has aged for many years and has lower residual heat, the basket 14 can be made of materials with lower thermal conductivity and higher strength, such as steel, to further increase packing density. The thickness and materials of these components can be selected based upon the strength that is needed as well as the amount of heat dissipation that is required. In some embodiments, however, the walls of the basket 14 are approximately to inches thick. The number of divider walls 22 that the basket 14 includes can be varied based upon the size and number of cells 16 that are desired. In the illustrated example, however, the basket 14 comprises eight divider walls 22 that form eight separate cells 16.
(19) In
(20) The internal basket 14 is configured to not only provide structural support to the spent fuel rods 18 but also to dissipate heat generated by the rods, particularly in the center of the canister, which is farthest from the walls of the outer housing 12. The basket 14 achieves this with the dividing walls 22, which transfer heat from the center of the canister 10 to the outer housing 12, which acts like a heat sink. The pie-piece configuration of the cells 16 increases this heat transfer by increasing the amount of basket material in the center of the canister 10 while simultaneously reducing the concentration of rods 18 in that location. In other words, the ratio of the mass of the heat-dissipating basket material to the mass of the fuel rod material increases as the canister 10 is traversed from the walls of the outer housing 12 to the center of the canister.
(21) The central tube 20 also reduces the density of the spent fuel rod material near the center of the canister 10. In addition, the central tube 20 acts as a load distribution cell that spreads loads imposed upon the canister 10, for example, if the canister is impacted because of an accident. In addition, the central tube 20 can provide space for a drain tube (not shown) that is used to drain residual water that drips down to the bottom of the canister from the fuel rods during a draining and drying process performed prior to sealing of the canister 10.
(22)
(23) As is apparent in
(24)
(25) The internal basket 44 forms multiple cylindrical storage cells 46. As is apparent from
(26) In
(27) Spacing between the cylindrical tubes 48 is maintained by one or more spacer disks 50 that extend between the outer surfaces of the tubes. In some embodiments, one such spacer disk 50 can be positioned at least at each end of the canister 40. The spacer disks 50 can, for example, be made of the same thermally-conductive material from which the tubes 48 are made. As is further shown in
(28) Although corrugated dividers similar to those described above can be provided within the storage cells 46, if desired, it is noted that they are not likely required because the distance from the outer wall of the cylindrical tubes 48 to the centers of the tubes is not great.
(29)
(30) The internal basket 64 defines multiple rectangular storage cells 66. As is apparent from
(31) In
(32) Spacing between the rectangular tubes 68 is maintained by one or more spacer disks 70 that extend between the outer surfaces of the tubes. In some embodiments, one such spacer disk 70 can be positioned at least at each end of the canister 60. In some embodiments, the spacer disks 70 can be made of the same thermally-conductive material from which the tubes 68 are made.
(33) It is also noted that, instead of spacer disks 70, the basket 64 could comprise a solid cylindrical member having drilled rectangular channels adapted to receive tubes 68 could be used to separate the tubes and provide for increased heat dissipation.
(34)
(35) As is apparent in
(36) Irrespective to the nature of the canisters that are used to store the spent fuel rods 18, the canisters can be placed in a storage or transport cask.
(37) The dry storage systems described in this disclosure provide numerous advantages over conventional storage systems. As noted above, much higher packaging density can be achieved and a large amount of void space is removed to limit the amount of neutron moderator (e.g., water) that can intrude, and reconfiguration of the fuel within the canister under transport and long-term disposal conditions. This eliminates need for expensive neutron absorber material. Because of the design of the canister baskets, improved heat removal can be achieved providing for a more uniform heat profile for the canisters in a geologic repository. Because of the high packing density, better shielding can be achieved with the outer rods shielding the inner rods, especially if the inner rods are hotter, high burnup fuel rods. In addition, the canister designs are relatively simple, which provides advantages in terms of structural analysis and ease of implementation. Furthermore, higher safety margins of storage can be achieved while simultaneously reducing costs. Additionally, damaged fuel rods can be managed more easily. Finally, the designs present a configuration strategy that supports efficient spent fuel packaging, fuel reprocessing, transport, and disposal, as well as standardization of storage, transport, and disposal systems.