METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN EMERGENCY UNIT AND VALVE CONTROL DEVICE
20190301378 · 2019-10-03
Inventors
Cpc classification
F02D41/042
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D2200/101
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D31/006
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F02D31/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02D41/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A method for controlling an emergency unit of an internal combustion engine including the following steps: inputting a threshold value for an overspeed of the engine; detecting a second rotational speed of the engine with a second rotational speed sensor; checking the plausibility of the second rotational speed. The plausibility checking includes the following steps: inputting a first rotational speed detected by a first rotational speed sensor of an engine control unit; calculating a difference between the second rotational speed and the first rotational speed; comparing the difference with a recorded threshold value for the difference; in the event that the difference is smaller than the threshold value for the difference, emitting a plausibility signal. After receipt of the plausibility signal, the method includes inputting the second rotational speed; and using the second rotational speed for an activation process of the emergency unit according to the overspeed.
Claims
1-11. (canceled)
12. A method for controlling an emergency device of a combustion machine having an engine, wherein the emergency device comprises at least one quick-closing valve, the method comprising the steps of: reading in a threshold value for an overspeed of the combustion machine; detecting a second speed of the combustion machine with a second speed sensor; performing a plausibility check on the second speed, wherein the plausibility check comprises: reading in a first speed detected by a first speed sensor of an engine control unit; calculating a difference between the second speed and the first speed; comparing the difference with a stored threshold value for the difference; and outputting a plausible signal if the difference is smaller than the threshold value for the difference; reading in the second speed after receipt of the plausible signal; and using the second speed for an activation process of the emergency device in a manner dependent on overspeed.
13. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 12, wherein the activation process of the emergency device comprises the following steps: repeatedly comparing the second speed with the threshold value for the overspeed; activating the emergency device and/or closing the at least one quick-closing valve if the second speed is higher than or equal to the threshold value for the overspeed; and outputting a corresponding emergency signal to the engine control unit.
14. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 12, wherein, in addition to the threshold value for the overspeed, a number n of quick-closing valves and a number of teeth z of a measuring wheel of the second speed sensor are read in, and the read-in values are subsequently validated.
15. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 14, wherein the validation of the read-in values includes execution of an overspeed test, wherein subsequently, a check is performed regarding whether the activation of the emergency device has correspondingly taken place.
16. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 15, wherein, the overspeed test includes simulating or generating a speed corresponding to a stored threshold value for the overspeed.
17. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 15, including implementing the overspeed test by corresponding signal output or corresponding operation of the combustion machine.
18. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 14, further including outputting an alarm signal to the engine control unit upon failure of the plausibility check.
19. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 18, including outputting the alarm signal if the difference is greater than or equal to the threshold value for the difference.
20. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 12, including activating the emergency device and outputting an emergency signal to the engine control unit when an emergency signal is read in.
21. The method for controlling an emergency device according to claim 13, comprising the additional step of outputting an alarm and/or triggering an engine stoppage by the engine control unit upon receipt of the emergency signal.
22. A valve control unit for carrying out the method according to claim 12, wherein the valve control unit is connectable to a second speed sensor.
23. A control device, comprising: an engine control unit; and a valve control unit according to claim 22, wherein the valve control unit is functionally separate from the engine control unit.
24. A combustion machine, comprising: an emergency device having at least one quick-closing valve in an air path of the combustion machine; a first speed sensor; a valve control unit according to claim 22; and a second speed sensor independent of the first speed sensor.
25. A combustion machine, comprising: an emergency device; a control device according to claim 23; and a second speed sensor independent of a first speed sensor of the engine control unit.
26. A combustion machine according to claim 25, wherein the emergency device has at least one quick-closing valve in an air path of the combustion machine.
Description
[0032] Further advantages, features and details of the invention will emerge from the following description of the preferred embodiments and on the basis of the drawing; in which:
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039] In particular, the valve control unit SFB is designed to validate the values transmitted by the engine control unit ECU, wherein the validation of the read-in values comprises the execution of an overspeed test, in the case of which, by corresponding signal output or by corresponding operation of the combustion machine, a speed higher than the stored threshold value for the overspeed is simulated or generated, and subsequently, a check is performed as regards whether the activation of the emergency device has correspondingly taken place. Various scenarios of this overspeed test will be discussed in more detail with reference to
[0040] If the validation fails, the valve control unit SFB is designed to output a corresponding fault notification to the engine control unit ECU. The valve control unit SFB is likewise designed to output a corresponding fault notification or alarm signal to the engine control unit ECU in the event of a failure of the plausibility check, in particular if the difference between second speed nMOT2 and first speed nMOT1 is greater than or equal to the threshold value for the difference. Furthermore, the valve control unit SFB is designed such that, in the event a successful validation and plausibility checking, it additionally outputs an availability signal, that is to say transmits information to the effect that the emergency device is available and intact.
[0041] Upon receipt of an emergency stop signal, the valve control unit SFB is designed to activate your the emergency device with the two quick-closing valves QCV-A and QCV-B and output an emergency signal to the engine control unit ECU. The engine control unit is designed to trigger an engine stoppage, in particular an injection stoppage of the injectors of the combustion machine, both in response to an emergency signal of the valve control unit SFB and in response to an emergency stop signal a user or of some other monitoring device.
[0042]
[0043] If the validation, in this case the initial commencement of operation, is successful, a plausibility check is performed. This comprises the detection of a second speed nMOT2 of the combustion machine by means of a second speed sensor 120 and the reading-in of a first speed nMOT1 detected by means of a first speed sensor 110 of the engine control unit ECU, and a calculation of a difference dn between the second speed nMOT2 and the first speed nMOT1. In the next step, the difference dn is then compared with a stored threshold value GW for the difference; in the present exemplary embodiment, it is checked whether the difference dn is smaller than the threshold value GW, and if the difference dn is smaller than the threshold value GW for the difference, a plausible signal is output. After receipt of the plausible signal, the method is continued correspondingly with the steps described below with reference to
[0044] The further method is illustrated in
[0045] In the second case, specifically the emergency stop control, an emergency stop signal is read in. In an optional further step, it is firstly checked whether an emergency stop is active, and if so, as described above, the emergency device is activated and the at least one quick-closing valve QCV is closed. If the emergency stop is not active, a no is read in, and the query as regards whether the emergency stop is active is performed once again. The method then continues correspondingly to that described above with reference to the overspeed control.
[0046]
[0047] In scenario A, a signal is applied which indicates that the threshold value nMOT(MAX) has been reached or overshot (the overshooting is thus simulated). As soon as the signal is read in, the relay that switches the two quick-closing valves is activated, and an activation sequence with two activation intervals of x seconds is run through, between which there is an inactive phase of y seconds. In the situation shown, both quick-closing valves QCV-A and QCV-B are triggered within the first activation interval. At the end of the activation sequences, a signal is output to the effect that the read-in values are valid. Scenario B differs from A in that, here, the first quick-closing valve QCV-A closes only after the second activation interval. In this case, it is optionally possible, after the first activation interval, for a fault notification to be output to the effect that the values are not valid. At the end of the activation sequences, it is then the case, as in situation A, that the signal is output to the effect that the read-in values are valid. The scenarios C and D correspond, as regards the behavior of the quick-closing valves, to the scenarios A and B. They differ with regard to the triggering factor. Here, in the scenarios C and D, the speed is actually increased, and an attainment of the threshold value nMOT(MAX) is detected, whereupon the relay is activated. It is also the case in scenarios C and D that the values are evaluated as being valid after the completion of the activation sequence. In situation E, the quick-closing valve QCV-B closes without the relay having been activated. In this case, a fault notification is output.
[0048]
[0049] The combustion machine 200 furthermore has a valve control unit SFB as described above, and an engine control unit ECU connected to the valve control unit. The valve control unit SFB is connected to a second speed sensor (not illustrated here), and the engine control unit ECU is connected to a first speed sensor (likewise not illustrated here).