METHOD FOR COMMISSIONING A DOOR SYSTEM

Abstract

A method for commissioning a door system, with the door system having at least one door component, with the commissioning including the following method step carrying out an electronically defined test process of the door system wherein the test process includes test steps and/or test functions, wherein the sequence of the test steps and/or test functions is stored electronically in the test process, wherein the test process is defined for a preconfigured door system type.

Claims

1. A method for commissioning a door system, wherein the door system has at least one door component, wherein the commissioning comprises the following method step: a. carrying out an electronically defined test process of the door system wherein the test process comprises a plurality of test steps and/or a plurality of test functions, wherein the sequence of the test steps and/or test functions is stored electronically in the test process, wherein the test process is defined for a preconfigured door system type.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electronically defined test process comprises carrying out at least one test step, wherein the test step corresponds to an operating step which is carried out by the door system during operation of the door system, wherein at least the test step is designed as: a motorized door opening, a motorized door closure, a motorized door stop, an electrically performed door unlocking, an electrically performed door lock, electrically establishing a requirement for manual unlocking and/or locking or a visual or acoustic indication of a state of the door system.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the door system comprises a plurality of door components, wherein the electronically defined test process comprises carrying out at least one test function, wherein the test function comprises a functional interaction of a plurality of door components, wherein the test function corresponds to an operating function that is carried out by the door system during operation of the door system, wherein at least the test function for carrying out the test function comprises the interaction of the following door components: a signal transmitter and a door drive a signal transmitter and a locking device a plurality of door drives a plurality of locking devices at least one door drive and at least one locking device.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the test function requires an action by a user, wherein it is displayed or output on a mobile terminal of an installer, which action the installer has to perform in order for the test function to be successful, wherein the action comprises a local positioning of the installer, an actuation of a door component, an opening and/or closing of the door and/or an authentication of the installer.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mobile terminal displays or outputs the action that the installer has to perform in order for the test function to be successful in the form of plain text, wherein the installer makes inputs in plain text in the mobile terminal, so that the mobile terminal can, if necessary, instruct a repetition of the action or another action from a test process for testing the door system.

6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mobile terminal comprises a typeset-based database and/or an AI-based assistance system, through which a. the mobile terminal translates into plain text actions stored in machine language that the installer has to perform in order for the test function to be successful, and/or b. the mobile terminal translates into machine language inputs entered by the installer in plain text in order to process them and to carry out a further test step of a test process.

7. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mobile terminal has a voice processing device, wherein the output of plain text by the mobile terminal to the installer comprises a voice output and/or the mobile terminal detects and processes a voice input in plain text by the installer as an input.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the mobile terminal displays or outputs a time interval in which the installer has to perform the action and/or wherein the installer has to perform a plurality of actions, wherein the order of the actions and, if necessary, the time intervals for carrying out the actions are displayed or output to the installer by the mobile terminal.

9. (canceled)

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the door system comprises a plurality of door components, wherein a functional interaction of the door components is configured to be verified by the test process, wherein the door components are provided to be arranged on a plurality of doors and/or the door components are designed differently from one another, wherein a functional interaction of the door components is configured to be verified by the test process.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least one desired test result is stored in the electronically stored test process, wherein the result of a test step, a test function or the test process can be determined using a sensor and/or a control device of the door system, wherein the desired test result is compared electronically with the determined test result and/or a test run, a test function or a test step is positively completed by the mobile terminal in that the result to be expected is displayed or output by the mobile terminal and confirmed by way of an input.

12. The method according to claim 1, wherein, if a comparison of the desired test result with the determined test result is negative, a fault is searched for electronically by the door system, wherein the error and/or a troubleshooting option is displayed or output by the mobile terminal, wherein the troubleshooting option comprises replacing a door component and/or setting a parameter by the installer, wherein the parameter is set on the mobile terminal and/or wherein an immediate input option for setting the parameter that is used for troubleshooting is a troubleshooting option.

13. The method according to claim 8, wherein if a comparison of the desired test result with the determined test result is negative, the completion of the commissioning of the door system is denied, wherein a repetition of the test process at the end of commissioning is only possible by the stored test process and/or wherein, if at least for a first test function, for which the comparison of the desired test result with the test result of the test function carried out is negative, and for at least one second test function, for which the comparison of the desired test result with the test result of the test function carried out is positive, the first test function is to be repeated, wherein the second test function is not to be repeated.

14. The method according to claim 1, that the result of the successful, positive test process is stored in a door arrangement, and/or a test process log is created, wherein the test process log can be electronically signed by the installer and/or by an inspector.

15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the test process is stored in an electronic control unit of the door system and/or in a mobile terminal, wherein the control unit and/or the mobile terminal controls the test process and/or comprises a wireless interface to the mobile terminal.

16. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least a plurality of the door components, which are verified by the test process, are connected to a first bus system, wherein the control unit is connected to the first bus system, wherein the control unit receives via the first bus system a behavior and/or a state of the door components involved in the test process.

17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the door system comprises a plurality of different door components, wherein a functional interaction of the door components can be verified by the test process, wherein the functional interaction corresponds to the cooperation of the door components in the operation of the door system, wherein the cooperation is implemented by firmware, wherein the firmware is stored on the control unit and/or wherein door components connected to the first bus system cooperate by the firmware.

18. A door system and/or door arrangement for carrying out the method according to claim 1.

19. A computer program product for carrying out the method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one computer program product can be stored in the door system.

20. The method according to claim 2, wherein the test process comprises a plurality of test steps, wherein the sequence of the test steps is stored electronically in the test process, wherein the sequence of the plurality of test steps is carried out automatically and/or in a predefined order one after the other.

21. The method according to claim 4, wherein the test process comprises a plurality of test functions, wherein the sequence of the test functions is stored electronically in the test process, wherein the sequence of the test functions is carried out automatically and/or in a predefined order one after the other.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0090] Further details and advantages of the disclosure will be explained below on the basis of the exemplary embodiments shown in the figures. Technical features with identical functions are provided here with identical reference numerals in the figures. They show:

[0091] FIG. 1 a first exemplary embodiment of a door system according to the disclosure and a door arrangement according to the disclosure,

[0092] FIG. 2 a second exemplary embodiment of a door system according to the disclosure and a door arrangement according to the disclosure

[0093] FIG. 3 a third exemplary embodiment of a door system according to the disclosure and a door arrangement according to the disclosure and

[0094] FIG. 4 a basic flow chart of a method according to the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0095] A first exemplary embodiment, a second exemplary embodiment and a third exemplary embodiment of a door system 60, 61, 62 according to the disclosure and a door arrangement 100 according to the disclosure are represented in FIGS. 1 to 3. The door arrangement 100 according to the disclosure comprises a computing unit 10. The computing unit 10 comprises a computing device 11 which is designed as a personal computer. The computing device comprises a screen 12 and a keyboard 13.

[0096] The computing unit 10 comprises at least one electronic memory. For example, this can be a memory in a cloud. A first database 20, a second database 21 and a third database 22 are stored in the memory. Alternatively and not represented, the first and the second database 20, 21 can be designed as a common database. The second and third database 21, 22 can also be designed as a common database. In a further alternative, the first and the third database 20, 22 can be designed as a common database. In a further database, the first to third database 20, 21, 22 are integrated in a common database.

[0097] Different door systems 60, 61, 62 according to the disclosure are represented in the FIGS. 1 to 3. The doors systems 60, 61, 62 are each part of the door arrangement 100 according to the disclosure. The door systems 60, 61, 62 each comprise a control unit 30 as a first door component. The door systems 60, 61, 62 each comprise a first bus system 32, e.g. a CAN bus.

[0098] The door systems 60, 61, 62 comprise further door components. The first door system 60 in FIG. 1 comprises by way of example a motorized door drive 35, a motor lock 33, an escape route controller 51 with an emergency button, an electromagnetic door lock 52 and a hazard detector, in particular a smoke detector 53, as further door components. The door components 35, 33, 51, 52, 53 have different functions and functional properties. Thus, the door components 35, 33, 51, 52, 53 belong to different door component types 40, 41, 44, 45, 46.

[0099] The second door system 61 in FIG. 2 and the third door system 62 in FIG. 3 each comprise a plurality of motorized door drives 35, 36 as door components. The motorized door drives 35, 36 are of identical design and thus belong to the same door component types 41. Furthermore, the second door system 61 and the third door system 62 comprise a plurality of sensors 37, 38 and 56, 57 as door components. The sensors 37, 38 and 56, 57 are used to detect a person approaching the door leaves. The motorized door drives 35, 36 can then open the door leaves in an order predefined in time as a functional process. Additionally or alternatively, the signals of the sensors 37, 38 or 56, 57 are used to stop the door by means of the door drive 35, 36 in order to avoid injury to the person. The sensors 37, 38 and 56, 57 are of identical design and therefore belong to the same door component types 42.

[0100] Furthermore, a program switch 39 or 58 is provided as a door component in each case. A user can use the program switch 39, 58 to determine whether or not the sensors 37, 38 or 56, 57 cause a motorized door opening when a person is detected. A program switch 43 is assigned to its own door component type 39.

[0101] The door drives 35, 36 of the second door system 61 are designed to each be arranged on a door leaf of a double-leaf door. The second door system 61 comprises a motor lock 34 for an active leaf of the double-leaf door and a motor lock 33 for a passive leaf of the double-leaf door. The motor locks 33, 34 are each assigned to their own door component types 40, 43. A further door component of the second door system 61 is designed as a reader 31 as a further door component type 48. In particular, the reader 31 can communicate wirelessly with a card or a mobile telephone in order to receive an access attribute. An access decision is made by the control unit 30.

[0102] The door drives 35, 36 of the third door system 62 are designed to each be arranged on a door leaf of an interlock, each with a single-leaf door. The third door system 62 comprises two motor locks 33, 59 for the active leaf. The motor locks each belong to the same door component type 40. The door system 62 also comprises a plurality of readers 29, 31, with one reader 29, 31 each being provided for arrangement on a door of the interlock.

[0103] The door components 33, 35, 51, 52, 53 of the first door system 60 are connected to a first bus system 32. Some door components 33, 34, 35, 36 of the second door system 61 are connected to the first bus system 32. Other door components 37, 38, 39 of the second door system 61 are only indirectly connected to the control unit 30 via a door drive 35, 36. The reader 31 is connected via a third bus system 55, e.g. an RS 485 bus, to the control unit 30.

[0104] The door components 30, 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 58, 59 of the third door system 62 are connected to the first bus system 32. The components 29, 30, 31 are connected via the third bus system 55.

[0105] The control unit 30 comprises a transmitting and receiving unit for wireless near-field communication with a mobile terminal 50. The door arrangement according to the disclosure comprises the mobile terminal 50.

[0106] Since the first door system 60, the second door system 61 and the third door system 62 comprises different door components, the door systems 60, 61, 62 correspond to different door system types 70, 71, 72.

[0107] A door system 60, 61, 62 is characterized in that each door system 60, 61, 62 comprises a common electronic configuration 82. The configuration 82 is designed as at least one electronic file and can be stored on the control unit 30. Exactly one configuration 82 for each type of door system 70, 71, 72 is preferably provided. The databases 20, 21 can be provided for selecting and making available the configuration 82 provided for the door system 60, 61, 62.

[0108] A door system 60, 61, 62 each comprises a common control unit 30. The control unit 30 is used to connect to the computing unit 10.

[0109] Depending on the door system type 70, 71, 72, a door system 60, 61, 62 can be provided for arrangement on one or on a plurality of doors. In a further exemplary embodiment, not represented, a door system is used, for example, for arrangement on two double-leaf doors arranged one behind the other or on a hotel corridor with four rooms.

[0110] It may be that a door arrangement 100 comprises a plurality of door systems 60, 61, 62. The door systems 60, 61, 62 can belong to the same or different door system types 70, 71, 72. The door systems 60, 61, 62 are preferably connected to one another and/or to the computing unit 10 via the second bus system 25.

[0111] According to the disclosure, the electronic configuration 82 comprises a test process that can be stored electronically. A test of the door system 60, 61, 62 during the commissioning procedure for each door system type 60, 61, 62 is predefined by means of the test process. Thus, the test process when commissioning a door system 60, 61, 62 of the same door system type 70, 71, 72 is always identical. As a result, commissioning can take place that is largely independent of the knowledge of the installer. As a result, errors in the testing of the door system 60, 61, 62 can be avoided. This results in a particularly safe and predictable operation of the door system 60, 61, 62 after it has been commissioned.

[0112] The electronic configuration 82 also comprises a list of components in each case, in which are listed the provided door components of the door system 60, 61, 62 or the provided door components 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58 of the door system 60, 61, 62, which are connected to the control unit 30 in terms of information technology. If door components are present multiple times, the list of components thus comprises position information. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 2, the position information is door drive for the active leaf, door drive for the passive leaf. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 3, the position information reads door drive for the first door, door drive for the second door, sensor for the first door, sensor for the second door, motor lock for the first door, motor lock for the second door, reader for the first door and reader for the second door. The control unit 30 can use the list of components to control operating functions via firmware.

[0113] The electronic configuration 82 preferably comprises in each case information about which door components connected to the first or third bus system 32, 55 exchange which messages. Thus, the electronic configuration 82 comprises transmitters and receivers of messages. For example, it is provided that the door drive 36 of the door system 61 or the program switch 58 of the door system 62 reports to the control unit 30 in which operating mode the door system 61, 62 is to be operated. The program switch 58 is thus defined as the transmitter and the control unit 30 as the receiver. One operating mode here is an automatic mode in which when a person approaches the door, which is detected by the sensor 37, 38, the door drive 35, 36 associated with the sensor opens the door. Another operating mode is manual operation, in which an approach of a person to the door does not lead to a motorized opening of the door. Rather, the person must authenticate themselves at the reader 31 so that the door is opened or can be opened. The reporting of the program switch 58 to the control unit 30 corresponds to an operating step that is preferably verified as a test step in the test process.

[0114] As another example, the electronic configuration 82 specifies that when there is a valid access attribute received by the reader 29 for the first door of the door system 62, the control unit 30 causes the motor lock 33 for the first door to be unlocked. For this purpose, the control unit 30 can send a message to a drive controller of the door drive 35 for the first door, which then actuates the motor lock 33 for the first door. Alternatively, the control unit 30 can send a message to the motor lock 33 for the first door. Thus, the control unit 30 is defined as the transmitter and the drive controller or the motor lock 33 as the receiver in the electronic configuration 82. Sending the message to the drive controller or the motor lock 33 corresponds to an operating step that is preferably verified as a test step in the test process.

[0115] The electronic configuration 82 preferably comprises firmware or instructions for the firmware to carry out operating functions. In the case of an operating function, a plurality of messages and/or controls must be carried out one after the other in a defined order. Thus, an operating function comprises a plurality of operating steps. The order is stored in the electronic configuration 82 as firmware or as instructions for the firmware. For example, in manual mode, a person has authenticated themselves by means of a key switch, which is arranged on the escape route controller 51 in FIG. 1. The escape route controller 51 reports the authentication to the control unit 30 and unlocks the door lock 52. The control unit 30 informs the door drive 35 about the unlocking of the door lock 52 and the duration of the unlocking. The drive controller of the door drive 35 then actuates the motor lock 33 for unlocking and, after the motor lock 33 has been unlocked, opens the door by motor. An operating function of this type is preferably verified as a test function in the test process.

[0116] The test process preferably comprises a plurality of such test steps and/or test functions. The order is electronically predefined here.

[0117] The electronic configuration 82 preferably contains preset parameters for the door system 60, 61, 62, e.g. an unlocking time of the door lock 52 or a hold-open time for the door drive 35, 36.

[0118] Since door components 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, 59 of a door system 60, 61, 62 are connected to one another via a first and/or third bus system 32, 55, it is possible to reproduce different operating functions and/or operating functions with a large number of operating steps by means of the firmware. Furthermore, it is easy to adapt the operating functions to changed operating conditions.

[0119] Before the start of the test process according to the disclosure, bus addresses of the door components 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, which are connected to the control unit in terms of information technology, i.e. via the first or the third bus system 32, 55, have been stored so as to be assigned to a door component type 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 in the control unit 30. If a plurality of door components 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 59 of a door component type 40, 41, 42, 48 are present, the bus addresses have been assigned to the door component type and the position information. This allows complex operating functions to be implemented using firmware. The assignment takes place e.g. by an input of the installer on the mobile terminal 50, in particular when a plurality of door components 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 59 of a door component type 40, 41, 42, 48 are present. For this purpose, the mobile terminal 50 has knowledge of the bus address or an identifier, assigned to the bus address, of the door component 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 59 to be assigned. The installer can input a position for the bus address or the identifier, which the terminal 50 assigns to the bus address or the identifier and sends to the control unit 50.

[0120] It can optionally be provided that the assignment takes place automatically, in particular in the control unit 30, if the door component type 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 is present only once in the door system 60, 61, 62. For this purpose, the door components 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58 communicate the respective door component type 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 to the control unit 30. The control unit 30 can then store the bus address assigned to the door component type 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 electronically.

[0121] With regard to the first bus system 32, the following assignment method is possible. Each door component 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, 59 connected to the first bus system 32 receives its own bus address from the control unit 30. Each door component 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, 59 of the door system 60, 61, 62 connected to the first bus system 32 sends the control unit 30 the door component type 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 of the respective door component 33, 34, 35, 36, 51, 52, 53, 56, 57, 58, 59. If each door component type 40, 41, 44, 45, 46 is present only once in the door system 60, 61, 62, the control unit 30 thus assigns the bus address to each door component type thus each door component. Thus, when the control unit 30 has to send a message or command to a specific door component, the control unit 30 knows the bus address.

[0122] If a plurality of door components 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 59 of the same door component type 40, 41, 42 are present, then the door components 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 59 which are present multiple times and are connected to the first bus system 32, are to be assigned to a position. In the door system 61, these are the door drives 35, 36, of which a door drive 35 is in the position on the passive leaf and a door drive 36 is in the position on the active leaf. Therefore, identifiers of the door drives 35, 36, which is assigned to the bus address, e.g. Door drive 1 or Door drive 2, are displayed to the installer on the mobile terminal 50 after this information has been sent from the control unit to the mobile terminal 50. In addition, at least one of the positions of the door drives 35, 36 on the passive leaf and on the active leaf is displayed to the installer on the mobile terminal 50.

[0123] The installer can now select an identifier, e.g. for the door drive 36. The selected control unit 30 then receives the command from the mobile terminal 50 that the selected door drive 36 has to output a visual and/or acoustic sign. The control unit 30 informs the door drive 36 of the command. The door drive 36 then outputs a visual and/or acoustic sign. For this purpose, the door drive 36 can set a sign by means that the door drive 36 also uses during operation. For example, the door drive 36 can jolt the door or move the door a little. A haptically perceptible sign, e.g. changing a door state by the door component, is possible.

[0124] The installer now sees the position at which the selected door drive 36 is arranged, in this case on the active leaf. The installer can input the correct position on the mobile terminal. The mobile terminal 50 transmits the correct position on the active leaf and the identifier of the selected door drive 36 to the control unit 30.

[0125] The control unit 30 assigns the bus address to each door component whose position has thus become known to the control unit. Alternatively, the control unit 30 transmits the bus addresses to the mobile terminal 50, which carries out the assignment and makes the assignment directly or indirectly available to the control unit 30.

[0126] If a particularly secure commissioning method is required, the control unit 30 sends the bus addresses to mobile terminal 50. The installer selects a bus address directly or indirectly, whereupon, as described above, the associated door component outputs a visual and/or acoustic sign. By inputting the position, a provided door component or a provided door component type, the bus address can be assigned to a door component type, a provided door component and/or a position in the mobile terminal 50. The assignment is sent to control unit 30.

[0127] In all alternatives, the control unit 30 knows the bus address if the control unit 30 has to send to a specific door component a message or a command to the door drive 35 of the active leaf, but not to the door drive 36 of the passive leaf.

[0128] The operating functions reproduced in this way by the firmware are verified by means of the test process 200 by carrying out individual test steps and/or test functions. This is represented in FIG. 4 as an example. The door system 62 of FIG. 3 is referred to here purely by way of example. The columns marked by dashed lines symbolize in which unit or between which units the method step takes place. The first column is assigned to the computing unit 10, the second column to the mobile terminal 50, the third column to the control unit 30 and the fourth column to the other door components 33, 35, 36, 56, 57, 58, 59. The fourth column can thereby require a method step from one of the other door components 34, 35, 36, 56, 57, 58, 59. Communication between the units arranged in the columns takes place via the information technology connection, i.e. the first, the second or the third bus system 32, 25, 55 or the wireless near-field communication.

[0129] In a first method step 201, the installer starts the test process by way of an input on the mobile terminal 50. The mobile terminal 50 then sends a corresponding command to the control unit 30. As a result, the control unit 30 carries out the test steps and/or test functions to be checked in the test process in a defined order. In this case, a description of the test step and/or test function is displayed to the installer on the mobile terminal 50 before the test step or test function is carried out. For example, the installer receives the message Function1: Door 1 will be opened by motor, press here to start. The installer starts each test step or test function with an input.

[0130] In a second method step 202, for example, an operating function is verified in which no action by the installer is required. For example, it is verified whether, when the first door is opened by motor, first the motor lock 59 of the first door is unlocked and then the door drive 36 of the first door opens the first door. For this purpose, the control unit 30 sends a command to the drive controller of the door drive 36, whereupon a drive controller of the door drive 36 first sends an unlocking command to the motor lock 59 and then actuates the door drive 36 of the motor lock.

[0131] At the end of carrying out the test function, a door sensor, not represented in FIG. 3, detects whether the first door has been opened. In a step 203, the control unit 30 is notified, in particular via the first bus system, of what the door sensor has detected. If the door has been opened according to the door sensor, the control unit 30 automatically recognizes in step 203 that the test function has been completed successfully. The control unit 30 sends a corresponding message to the mobile terminal 50 in a step 204, whereupon the message Function 1 completed successfully is displayed to the installer.

[0132] In an alternative embodiment (not represented), the door system 62 does not comprise a door sensor. Rather, at the end of carrying out the test function, a message about the completion of the test function is sent from the control unit 30 to the mobile terminal 50. The mobile terminal 50 then requests an input from the installer about the successful completion of the test function. For example, it is displayed to the installer on the mobile terminal 50: Function 1 (motorized opening of door 1) successful? Yes/No. If the installer enters Yes, the test function has been completed successfully. If necessary, the installer signs the input with an electronic signature. The mobile terminal 50 sends a corresponding message to the control unit 30.

[0133] Now the next operating function is verified. For example, it is verified whether in an automatic mode of the door drive 36 and if the installer is in the detection region of the sensor 57 of the first door, the door drive 36 of the first door automatically opens the door. The mobile terminal 50 informs the installer Function 2: Door 1: sensory opening, press to start. Different actions of the installer are defined for carrying out this test function. Thus, in a step 205, the control unit 30 sends the request to the mobile terminal 50 to display the following instruction: Please set the program switch to automatic. Optionally, the installer is displayed a time interval in which to set the program switch to automatic. After the time interval has expired and/or after the program switch 58 has reported to the control unit 30 in a step 206 that automatic operation is set, in a step 207 the control unit 30 sends the request to the mobile terminal 50 to display the instruction Please go to door 1 on the mobile terminal 50. If the first door is then opened by motor, then, analogously to steps 203 and 204, in steps 208 and 209 the operating function is regarded as having been tested successfully.

[0134] If, on the other hand, the first door has not opened, which is detected by the door sensor, the control unit 30 determines that the expected test result has not been achieved (not represented). Alternatively, the installer can determine again by inputting into the mobile terminal that the test function was not completed successfully.

[0135] The control unit 30 now looks for a source of error. A database is available to control unit 30 for this purpose, or the control unit 30 can make a request to a database of the computing unit 10. For example, the control unit 30 verifies whether the sensor 57 can communicate via the first bus system 32. For this purpose, the control unit 30 sends the request to the sensor 57 to send a sign of life. If the sensor 57 then does not send a sign of life, the control unit 30 sends the request to the mobile terminal 50 to display the following text to the installer. Function 2: Door 1: sensory opening failed, possible cause: Door 1 sensor inactive, repeat function 2? Yes/No. This gives the installer the opportunity to rectify the error. Once the error has been rectified, the second function of the test process is repeated. The first function is not verified again.

[0136] In a further variant of the method 200 according to the disclosure, the first and/or the second function was regarded as having been tested successfully by the control unit 30 since the first door was opened by means of the door sensor. The installer, on the other hand, is not satisfied because the opening width or opening angle does not match the installation situation. In this case, the option Change parameters is displayed on the mobile terminal 50 in addition to the output of the message Function 2 completed successfully. By selecting the option, the installer can change the opening width or the opening angle.

[0137] In a further variant of the method according to the disclosure, it was determined by means of the drive controller of the door drive 36 that the door could not be opened with the set opening angle. A motor current can be measured for this purpose, for example. The drive controller sends a corresponding message to control unit 30. The control unit 30 regards the test of the second function as having failed and sends a message to the mobile terminal 50 to output the following message: Function 2: Door 1: sensory opening failed, possible cause: incorrect opening angle, set opening angle?. In addition, there is a possibility of setting the opening angle on the mobile terminal 50. Once the error has been rectified, the second function of the test process is repeated.

[0138] The door system 62 can only be put into operation if the entire test process has ended with a positive result. This takes place in a step 210, with the control unit 30 causing the mobile terminal to display a corresponding message. The successful conclusion of the test process is preferably stored in the third database 22.

[0139] It may be that not every operating function is fully simulated by a test function. Thus, the test function can deviate from the operating function. Rather, it can be provided, for example, that the installer triggers an alarm in the case of a smoke detector by actuating an actuating element instead of generating smoke. It may also be that the authentication step is skipped and the control unit 30 assumes a successful authentication in order to test the further steps of the operating function. In a further variant, it can be provided that for functions in which the same reader 31 is involved, the authentication is tested at the reader 31 in a test function, but for other functions in which the same reader 31 is involved, the authentication is skipped, for example when different access attributes trigger different operating functions. For example, a visitor with their access attribute can only open one of the interlock doors at a time, while a firefighter with their access attribute can open both interlock doors at the same time.

[0140] It can be provided that test steps are verified in the test process instead of test functions. For example, the first test function can be divided into the test steps motorized unlocking of the first door and motorized opening of the first door. It may be that the test steps are verified one after the other in the test process. For this purpose, in particular the installer can be displayed the description of the test step on the mobile terminal before the start of a test step. The installer can start the test step with an input. After completion of the test step, it can be determined by sensor or by input from the installer whether the test step was completed successfully.