SYSTEMS BASED ON 5-BROMO-7-AZAINDOLE DERIVATIVES AS FUTURE SOLID EMITTERS

Abstract

The present invention relates to a family of compounds derived from 5-bromo-7-azaindole to which alkyl chains have been incorporated in one of the nitrogens to make them soluble in organic solvents as well as the incorporation in the position 5 of 4-(diphenylamino)phenylboronic acid derivatives. These structural modifications increase the emission of the derivative in a solid state. The incorporation of aldehyde and 2-cyano-but-2-enoic acid derivatives in position 3 facilitates the attachment thereof in different systems. Given this characteristic, they may be applicable in the development of solid-state luminescent materials used in applications of detection, biomedical applications, solid-state illumination, as well as optoelectronic devices.

Claims

1. A compound of formula (I): ##STR00008## wherein R.sub.1 is a C.sub.1-C.sub.20 alkyl, R.sub.2 is selected from H, C.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl or OC.sub.1-C.sub.6 alkyl; R.sub.3 is selected from H, CN or CHO; R.sub.4 is selected from COOH, CN, O or CONH.sub.2; n is selected from 0 or 1. and wherein represents a bond which may be double or single depending on the rest of the bonds of carbon atoms which make up the bond.

2. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.1 is a C.sub.4 to C.sub.8 alkyl.

3. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.1 is a C.sub.10 to C.sub.18 alkyl.

4. The compound according to the preceding claim 3, wherein R.sub.1 is a C.sub.12 alkyl.

5. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.2 is H.

6. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.3 is H.

7. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.4 is O.

8. The compound according to claim 6, wherein n is 0.

9. The compound according to claim 1 which has the following formula: ##STR00009##

10. The compound according to claim 1, wherein R.sub.3 is COOH.

11. The compound according to claim 10, wherein R.sub.4 is CN.

12. The compound according to claim 10, wherein n is 1.

13. The compound according to claim 1, which has the following formula: ##STR00010##

14. (canceled)

15. A luminescent or electroluminescent material comprising a compound of formula (I) according to claim 1.

16. A device comprising a luminescent or electroluminescent material according to claim 15.

17. The device according to claim 16, wherein the device is an organic light-emitting diode.

18. The device according to claim 17 comprising: (a) a layer of electroluminescent material and optionally (b) an electron injection layer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] FIG. 1. Shows the absorption spectra of compounds 3 and 4 in dichloromethane in different concentrations.

[0026] FIG. 2. Shows the emission spectra 3 (.sub.exc=352 nm) and 4 (.sub.exc=391 nm) in dichloromethane and concentrations of 10.sup.5 M.

[0027] FIG. 3. Shows the emission of compounds 3 (left) and 4 (right) in dichloromethane in a concentration of 10.sup.6 M with the =365 nm lamp.

[0028] FIG. 4. Shows the absorption spectrum of the derivative 4 on film deposited by means of drop-casting on dichloromethane on the quartz slide.

[0029] FIG. 5. Shows the emission spectrum of 4 in solid state (.sub.exc=391 nm).

[0030] FIG. 6. Shows the emission of compounds 3 (left) and 4 (right) in their solid state exited with a =365 nm lamp.

[0031] FIG. 7. Shows the absorption spectra of compound 4 in THF and in different proportions of THF mixture: water in a concentration of 10.sup.6 M.

[0032] FIG. 8. Shows the emission of compound 4 in THF and in different proportions of THF: water in a concentration of 10.sup.6 M with the lamp of =365 nm.

[0033] FIG. 9. Shows the emission spectra of compound 4 in THF and in different proportions of THF mixture: water in a concentration of 10.sup.6 M.

[0034] FIGS. 10. A) and C) show the intensity curve versus voltage and B) and D) show the electroluminescence spectra of compound 3 using two different architectures for making the device (device A and B, respectively). The figures inserted in figures A and C provide diagrams of each configuration of the device used in each case, as well as the energy diagram of the materials required for the embodiment thereof.

[0035] FIG. 11. Shows a comparison for the derivative 3 of the normalized electroluminescence spectra at different voltages applied for two different configurations of optoelectronic devices, where A) is device A and B) is device B.

[0036] FIG. 12. A) Shows a comparison for the derivative 3 of the deconvolution obtained from the electroluminescence spectra acquired from the configuration of the optoelectronic system B (device B). B) Shows the dependence of each component versus the voltage applied in each case.

[0037] FIG. 13. A) Shows the current-voltage curve and B) shows the electroluminescence spectra of compound 4 for the optoelectronic device designed for compound 4. The figures inserted in FIG. 13A provide diagrams of the configuration of the device, as well as the energy diagram of the materials required for the embodiment thereof.

[0038] FIG. 14. Shows a comparison of electroluminescence spectra (obtained at different voltages) of the device made with compound 4.

[0039] FIG. 15. Shows a study on the stability over time of the device prepared for compound 4, comparing A) current-voltage and B) the electroluminescence spectra of two optoelectronic devices, just after their preparation and 5 weeks after their preparation. It is worth mentioning that during this time, the device was stored exposed to the air with no type of seal.

EXAMPLES

[0040] The invention is illustrated below by means of tests which reveal the effectiveness of the product of the invention.

Example 1: Synthesis of the Compounds of Formula (I) of the Invention

Synthesis of 5-bromo-1-dodecane-1H-pyrrole[2,3-b]pyridine (1)

[0041] ##STR00004##

[0042] In a flask, 5-bromo-7-azaindole (350 mg, 1.786 mmol), KOH (152 mg, 2.715 mmol), tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (32 mg, 0.09 mmol), and 1-iododecane (0.6 ml, 2.447 mmol) were mixed in 20 mL of acetone. The reaction was heated at 75 C. for 24 hours. The mixture was cooled at room temperature. The solvent was eliminated at low pressure and water was added. The organic phase was extracted with CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, dried with anhydrous MgSO.sub.4 and filtered. The dichloromethane was eliminated at low pressure and the solvent was left to evaporate. The product was purified in a chromatographic column using silica gel (hexane; 1:1 hexane: CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2). Compound 1 was obtained as a transparent viscous solid with a yield of 57%. .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 8.33 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J=3.5 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (d, J=3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.86-1.82 (m, 2H), 1.31-1.23 (m, 18H); 0.90-0.85 (t, J=3.2 Hz, 3H); .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 145.8, 143.1, 130.6, 129.3, 122.1, 111.4, 98.8, 44.8, 31.9, 30.3, 29.6, 29.5, 29.5, 29.3, 29.2, 26.8, 22.7, 14.1; FAB MS m/z 365.2 (M+H)+; HRMS (FAB) calculated for C.sub.19H.sub.30BrN.sub.2: 365,1599, found: 365,1592.

Synthesis of 5-bromo-1-dodecane-1H-pyrrole[2,3-b]pyridine-3-carboaldehyde. (2)

[0043] ##STR00005##

[0044] POCl.sub.3 (2.37 mL, 24.5 mmol) was added to a solution of 32 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF) in a nitrogen atmosphere at 0 C. After stirring for 20 min, 364 mg (1.0 mmol) of 1 dissolved in 8 mL of DMF was added, maintaining the bath at 0 C. for 30 min. It was then heated at 80 C. for 3 h, after which the mixture was cooled at room temperature and the solvent was eliminated at low pressure. The residue was diluted with water and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic phase was dried with anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, it was filtered and the solvent was evaporated in a vacuum. The resulting product was purified in a chromatographic column using silica gel (1:1 hexane: CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, obtaining a yellow solid with a yield of 59%. mp 53-57 C., .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 9.95 (s, 1H), 8.70 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.45 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 4.31 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.24 (m, 18H), 0.87 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 3H), .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 184.2, 146.8, 145.8, 138.5, 132.6, 119.0, 115.6, 115.1, 45.7, 31.9, 29.9, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.3, 29.07, 26.7, 22.7, 14.1; UV-vis (CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, 25 C.) .sub.max () 264 (26889), 291 (16153); FAB MS m/z 393 (M+H).sup.+; HRMS (FAB) calculated for C.sub.20H.sub.30BrN.sub.2O: 393,1537, found: 393,1541.

Synthesis of 5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-1-dodecane-H-pyrrole[2,3-b]pyridine-3-carboaldehyde. (3)

[0045] ##STR00006##

[0046] In a sealed tube, 100 mg (0.255 mmol) of 2, 88.5 mg (0.306 mmol) of triphenylamine boronic acid and 31 mg (0.027 mmol) of Pd (PPh.sub.3).sub.4 were mixed in 4 mL of dry toluene. It was bubbled with a current of N.sub.2 for 10 minutes and then 0.3 mL of an aqueous solution of K.sub.2CO.sub.3 2 M was added. The reaction was heated at 120 C. for 20 hours in a nitrogen atmosphere, after which it was taken to room temperature and water and dichloromethane were added and it was extracted. The organic phase was dried with anhydrous MgSO.sub.4, filtered and the solvent was evaporated at low pressure. The product was purified in a chromatographic column using silica gel (4:1 hexane: Ethyl acetate). Yield 90%, .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 10.09 (s, 1H), 8.82 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.74 (d, J=2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.64-7.61 (m, 2H), 7.41-7.35 (m, 4H), 7.29-7.23 (m, 6H); 7.17-7.12 (m, 2H); 4.46 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.0 (m, 2H), 1.35 (m, 18H), 0.97 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 3H), .sup.13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 184.4, 147.6, 147.5, 143.9, 138.3, 132.4, 132.3, 129.3, 128.3, 128.2, 124.5, 124.0, 123.1, 117.9, 116.4, 45.7, 31.9, 30.1, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 29.3, 29.1, 26.8, 22.7, 14.1; UV-vis (CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, 25 C.) .sub.max () 300 (108657), 343 (73250); FAB MS m/z 557 (M.sup.+); HRMS (FAB) calculated for C.sub.38H.sub.43N.sub.3O: 557,3406, found 557,3396.

Synthesis of 5-(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-1-dodecane-1H-pyrrole[2,3-b] pyridine-3-()-2-()-2-cyano-but-2-enoic acid (4)

[0047] ##STR00007##

[0048] 21.6 mg (0.241 mmol) of 2-cyanoacetic in 10 mL of acetonitrile and 6 L of distilled piperidine were added to a two-neck flask with 179 mg (0.313 mmol) of 3 dissolved in 1 mL dichloromethane. The reaction was heated at 90 C. for 24 hours in a nitrogen atmosphere, after which the reaction was cooled at room temperature. The resulting yellow solid was filtered using a filtering crucible and washed with acetonitrile. Yield 49%, mp 255-258 C., .sup.1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl.sub.3) 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.67 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 8.59 (s, 1H), 8.30 (d, J=2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53-7.50 (m, 2H), 7.29 (m, 4H), 7.22-7.14 (m, 6H); 7.14-7.09 (m, 2H); 4.43 (d, J=7.38 Hz, 2H), 2.0 (m, 2H), 1.25 (m, 18H), 0.87 (t, J=6.61 Hz, 3H), UV-vis (CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2, 25 C.) .sub.max () 290 (26164), 308 (27338), 379 (25217); MALDI MS m/z 625 (M+H)+; HRMS (MALDI) calculated for C.sub.41H.sub.44N.sub.4O.sub.2: 625,3491, found: 625,3512

Example 2: Optical Properties of Compounds (3) and (4)

[0049] The absorption and emission capacity were measured in a stationary state of compounds (3) and (4) of the invention. Both had absorption in the UV-vis region. FIG. 1 shows the absorption spectra of the UV-vis of the two molecules studied in CH.sub.2Cl.sub.2 (6.810.sup.6 M for 3 and 2.110.sup.5 M for 4). Observed in the absorption spectra were two absorption bands centered for compound 3 at .sub.max=300 and 342 nm and for compound 4 at .sub.max=308 and 380 nm, where a displacement of the bands is observed, due to the increase in the conjugation of compound 3 to compound 4.

[0050] FIG. 2 shows the emission spectra of 3 and 4 in dichloromethane under the excitation in the maximum absorption peaks .sub.exc=352 and 391 nm, respectively. The form of the emission band is modified in the case of compound 4, in which it is possible to observe the appearance of a 630 nm band and the reduction of the emission at the same concentration with respect to the derivative 3, maintaining the 470 nm band in common.

[0051] This result can be visually observed with the =365 nm lamp, as shown in the sample in FIG. 3, where the flasks used for the study of the emission show the strong fluorescence of compound 3 with respect to compound 4.

[0052] Furthermore, although in a solution compound 3 has greater fluorescence, compound 4 is much more emissive in a solid state. With the aim of researching the behavior of compound 4 in a solid, the absorption and emission spectra were carried out. (FIGS. 4 and 5) The absorption spectrum has two broad bands of 318 and 378 nm, with a width greater than when in a solution due to the interaction of the molecules in the solid. The emission spectrum of the solid has a single band at 500 nm. (.sub.max=391).

[0053] This result can be visually observed with the UV-vis lamp at =365 nm, as shown in FIG. 6 (right) where the strong fluorescence of the compound in the solid state may be observed 4. This result shows that the compounds of the invention are interesting for the application thereof in devices which require a highly fluorescent solid material.

[0054] Furthermore, in said compound 4 it is possible to observe the effect of aggregation-induced emission (AIE), since said luminogens are weakly fluorescent in solutions diluted with dichloromethane, yet highly emissive in amorphous powder. In an amorphous state, the molecules aggregate, producing a restriction in the intermolecular vibration, making the aggregate highly emissive, thereby presenting the AIE effect.

[0055] The AIE effect of compound 4 has been studied by looking at the absorption and emission in THF and a THF/H.sub.2O solution (FIG. 7, 8, 9). FIG. 7 shows how adding water produces a change in the UV-vis bands, the 373 nm band of compound 4 practically disappears in 100% of the THF until becoming a shoulder and is displaced up to 359 nm in the mixture of 70% THF/30% H.sub.2O and 40% THF/60% H.sub.2O. The band at 310 nm shifts batochromically to 319 nm. When the amount of water is greater, the formation of yellow fluorescent aggregates suspended in the solution (FIG. 8) is produced, which shows that the formation of aggregates causes an increase in the fluorescence and said compound is affected by the polarity of the solvent.

[0056] In the study of the fluorescence of compound 4 in THF and a THF/H.sub.2O solution in different proportions of water, a change in the emission (FIG. 9) is also observed, seeing the appearance of the yellow fluorescent aggregate in a proportion of 10% THF/90% H.sub.2O. The emission of said aggregate coincides with the maximum emission of the compound in a solid state at 500 nm.

Example 3: Electroluminescence Performance of Compound (3)

[0057] To explore the electro-optic behavior of compound 3, single-layer light emitting diodes were prepared which included an active layer of emissive material comprising compound 3 (EM) deposited by spin-coating from a dichloromethane (DCM) solution. It is known that the design of the structure of the device is critical in order to have an energetically favorable charge transfer and high mobility, therefore, the selection of each component that makes up the device is based on the HOMO/LUMO energy values obtained through theoretical calculations. Therefore, FIG. 10A provides a diagram for the architecture of the single-layer device (device A) including the energy levels of the materials. In more detail, device A is formed by an ITO anode/PEDOT:PSS (40 nm)/compound 3 deposited from a DCM solution (300 nm)/Yb metal cathode (150 nm) in which PEDOT:PSS works as a hole injection layer. The current-voltage (IV) curve shown in FIG. 10A follows the typical characteristics of the diode with a turn-on voltage of 3V (defined as forward voltage when the current increases exponentially). The electroluminescent (EL) spectrum shown in FIG. 10B had a single and broad band which becomes more intense under a higher polarization (from 0 to 18 V).

[0058] It is worth observing that the form of the EL spectrum does not change when increasing in the driving voltage (FIG. 11A) and is characterized by the maximum wavelength (.sub.mx) at 615 nm and a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of 3200 cm.sup.1. The large spectral shift observed in the EL spectrum in comparison with the PL spectrum (.sub.mx=435 nm with respect to .sub.mx=600 nm) indicates that the electric-hole recombination mechanism responsible for the EL signal of the device A is not the same as in the PL spectrum. A similar mismatch between the PL and EL spectra has been recently observed in 5-(4-nonylphenyl)-7-azaindole (the acceptor moiety of 1), where the formation of electromers was invoked to explain the EL emission. The photophysical studies of the molecule provided support for this type of behavior, given that a higher concentration of aggregates in the EM layer increased the performance of the OLED.

[0059] To do further research on the mechanism involved in the EL, an optimized device architecture with the incorporation of an electron injection layer, 2-(4-tert-butylpheny)-5-(4-butylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (PBD), was performed. This double-layer device (device B) was formed by an ITO anode/PEDOT:PSS (40 nm)/compound 3 from a DCM solution/PBD (20 nm)/Al metal cathode (150 nm), as shown in the box in FIG. 10C. The IV curve and the turn-on voltage of device B slightly differed from that obtained in device A (FIG. 10C). Additionally, FIG. 10D displays the EL spectrum of the device B with an enhancement of a factor of 60 with respect to device A, which indicates that the addition of the PBD layer favors the electron-hole recombination in device B. In opposition to the EL signal observed in device A, the EL spectrum in device B is red-shifted when the driving voltage is increased (FIG. 11B).

[0060] To gain further insight as to the origin of the EL signal, a Gaussian deconvolution of the EL spectrum was performed from 8 to 20 V (FIG. 12A). At lower driving voltages (from 8-10 V) three centered bands at 437, 555 and 615 nm with their relative contributions (obtained based on the integral intensity) varying from 0.20 to 0.1, 0.75 to 0.51, 0.05 to 0.28, respectively, were required to obtain an accurate fit. On the other hand, at higher voltages (from 13-20 V) only two Gaussian bands centered at 555 and 615 nm were required. Although the lower-energy component is also present in device A, indicating a common origin of these emitting species in both devices, the other two components are only present in the double-layer device (device B). One possible explanation for the new components is that they come from the PBD electroluminescence, where S.sub.1 and the electromer emission is centered at 366 and 518 nm, respectively, but these values are far from those found in device B, excluding this possibility. On the other hand, several studies have shown that in two-layer devices, the formation of an exciplex or electroplex, meaning, a biomolecular excited complex formed by the electron from the LUMO of the donor to the HOMO of the acceptor molecules via photo or electric field-excitation, at the interfacial area between the organic layers, could contribute to the EL spectra. Taking this fact into account, the exciplex emission (hv.sub.E) between compound 1 and PBD is estimated using the following equation:

hv.sub.E=E.sub.D/DE.sub.A/A0.15 oV (0.1 oV),

where E.sub.D.sup.+/.sub.D.sup. is the oxidation potential of 3 (0.5 eV) and E.sub.A.sup.+/.sub.A.sup. is the reduction potential of PBD (2.0 eV). The calculated emission of the exciplex is 2.65 eV (470 nm), which perfectly fits to the 467 nm component and therefore we assign the first component to the PBD exciplex emission. Since the distance to have an exciplex is smaller (0.3-0.4 nm) than the one required to have a electroplex (0.4-0.7 nm), the chance to form an electroplex between PBD and compound 3 is high enough to suggest that the contribution of 555 nm comes from the electroplex emission. Besides this, the red shift of the electroplex from the exciplex emission can be explained assuming that the electron and hole are much more stabilized than the singlet excited stated of the exciplex, which causes the radiative recombination to appear at lower energy (longer wavelengths) than the S.sub.1-exciplex emission.

[0061] A detailed analysis of dependence of integral intensity of each component with respect to forward voltage can help us to elucidate the origin of each emissive species. FIG. 12B shows that the component centered at 615 nm is clearly enhanced at high electric field, indicating that at higher driving voltages more electrons could be directly injected to the LUMO orbital of component 3 and therefore more electromers could be created. In contrast, the other species assigned to exciplexes and electroplexes are reduced when the driving voltage increases, mainly due to the phase separation between the EM layer and PBD layer. Consequently, the red-shift in the EL spectra with respect to the PL emission was attributed to the presence of different types of complexes in the EM layer, which preferentially formed nearest-neighbors hole-electron pairs between the EM and PBD layer. These results highlight the importance of the device structure of an OLED and how small modifications can alter the characteristics of the device.

Example 4: OLED Device Fabrication

[0062] For the device fabrication, an indium-tin-oxide (ITO)-coated glass substrate with a sheet resistance of 109 cm was used as a substrate. Before use, the substrates were first cleaned in an alkaline-detergent water (Hellmanex solution) using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min, followed by sonication for 10 min, consecutively, in water, acetone and isopropanol. After that, the cleaned ITO-glasses (30 min) were subjected to an ultraviolet-ozone treatment to enhance the work function of ITO layer. On the cleaned ITO substrates, a hole injection layer, PEDOT:PSS (Sigma Aldrich, high conductivity), was spin coated at 3000 rpm for 120 seconds and subsequently annealed at 150 C. during 15 minutes. Afterwards, the emissive layer of compound 3, was spin coated at 1000 rpm for 60 seconds using a solution of 20 mg/ml of 3 in DCM. Next, in the case of double-layer devices, the electron injection layer, 2-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-(4-biphenylyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (PBD, Sigma Aldrich), was spin coated at 5000 rpm for 120 seconds (in cyclohexane) and annealed at 80 C. for 15 minutes. Finally, a 150 nm ytterbium (Yb) or aluminum (Al) electrode was thermally evaporated under a high vacuum on top of the organic layer. Yb and Al were chosen for their low work function and higher stability to oxygen compared to other low work function metals such as alkaline earth metals (Ca, Mg) used earlier.

Stationary Fluorescence Measurements

[0063] The UV-visible steady-state absorption and emission spectra were recorded using a Lamda-950 and Edinburgh fls980 spectrometers, respectively The Edinburgh fls980 spectrometer was corrected for the wavelength dependence of the throughput of the emission monochromator and the sensitivity of the detector. To obtain the photoluminescence spectra of compound 3 in film, the protocol as developed to make the EM layer was followed to obtain proper samples. The different solutions of compound 3 in cyclohexane, toluene, dichloromethane and acetonitrile (5 mg/ml) were spin coated at 1000 rpm for 60 seconds on an ultrasonically cleaned quartz substrate.

Stationary Electroluminescence Measurements

[0064] Stationary measurements have been recorded using Edinburgh fls980 fluorimeter (the same equipment used for the stationary fluorescence measurements) where the Xe-lamp (the lamp uses to excite the sample) was blocked in order to only register the electroluminescence spectra.

IV Curves

[0065] All IV curves were measured in the dark at room temperature using a Keihtley 2400 device.

Example 5: Electroluminescence Performance of Compound (4)

[0066] The good photophysical properties of compound 4 show the possible use thereof as an active emissive layer in OLED applications. According to the theoretical calculations, where the HOMO-LUMO were found at 5.3 and 2.4 eV, respectively, a double-layer light-emitting device was functional. The inset of FIG. 13A schematizes the used OLED configuration: ITO anode/PEDOT:PSS (40 nm)/compound 4 from a toluene solution/(300 nm)/2-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-5-(4-biphenylyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole, (PBD)/Al metal cathode (150 nm), where the PEDOT:PSS and PBD act as a hole and electron injection layer, respectively. The device current-voltage (IV) curve depicted in FIG. 13A shows a typical diode behavior with a turn-on voltage of 4 V.

[0067] To get more information about the electroluminescent properties of 4, the electroluminescence (EL) spectra were recorded. FIG. 13B shows a very broad EL spectrum spanning from 400 nm to 700 nm, and it becomes more intense under a higher forward polarization. Together with this, as shown in FIG. 14, upon increasing forward driving voltage, the EL spectra becomes slightly broader (from 3300 to 3400 cm.sup.1), however, in all of them, the maximum wavelength is centered around 520 nm. The EL maximum overlaps nicely with the PL maximum. However, the EL spectra is much broader. A possible explanation could be the presence of additional species around 460 nm and 560 nm.

[0068] Similar observations report the presence of exciplexes and/or electroplexes in bi-layer devices. A hetero bimolecular complex in the excited state formed in the interface of the layers. The exciplex emission can be estimated using the following equation:

hv.sub.E=E.sub.D.sub..sub./D.sub.+E.sub.A/A0.15 eV (0.1 eV)

where E.sub.D.sup.+/.sub.D.sup. is the oxidation potential 4 (0.5 eV) and E.sub.A.sup.+/.sub.A.sup. is the reduction potential of PBD (2.0 eV). The obtained value of 2.6 eV (470 nm) is in the expected spectral region. The possibility of having an electroplex when an exciplex is observed is fairly high since the distance needed to form an electroplex is smaller (0.4-0.7 nm) than the exciplex emission (0.2-0.4 nm). It is worth noting that the electroplex emission is significantly red shifted in comparison to the exciplex due to the electron-hole stabilization in HOMO and LUMO of each molecule that form the bimolecular complex. Based on those facts, the red emitting species around 560 nm could be assigned to the electroplex emission.

[0069] A similar phenomenon has been observed for a similar molecule using the same double-layer device form compound 3. In this case, the exciplex and electroplex emission have been observed at the same wavelengths, which support the assumption that the blue and red EL species come mainly from electroplex and exciplexe formation. On the other hand, in the previous study, the emission from the LUMO-HOMO recombination was not observed and instead an electromer emission was observed (homo bimolecular complex formed by identical charged molecules). To comprehend the reason why here the HOMO-LUMO recombination was favored, an analysis of the chemical structures and their implication in the energy diagram should be understood. The dissimilarity between both molecules lies in the electron acceptor group. In the previous case, the azaindole had a connected aldehyde group, now the group consists of a cyano and carboxyl group. The presence of a stronger electron acceptor in the molecule stabilizes the LUMO 0.7 eV, as it has been described in the theoretical calculation, and consequently the possibility of having an electron-hole recombination between two azaindole molecules is reduced (LUMO energy is 1.2 eV) in favor of the electron-hole recombination in the HOMO-LUMO of the molecule. These results highlight the fact that small modifications in the chemical structure of the emissive molecule could improve optoelectronic properties, as well as allow the color emission of the OLED to be tuned.

[0070] Similar to other studies, the current and electroluminescent stability over time in a non-sealed device was tested (FIG. 15). In this case, the results highlight that even though the current is reduced in a five weeks-aged device, the EL spectra remains constant, which suggest that the degradation on the EM layer is rather small. The differences found on the IV curve could be explained by the degradation of the contacts due to its exposure to oxygen and moisture. Based on that, it is important to highlight that a proper sealing of the device will provide a robust device.