MOLLUSCAN SHELLFISH PRODUCED BY CONTROLLED CROSSBREEDING

Abstract

Improved molluscan shellfish in diploid, tetraploid and triploid forms are provided. Also provided are methods for improving molluscan shellfish through progressive rotational crossbreeding and/or coalesced interploidy breeding.

Claims

1. A method for breeding a diploid mollusk with improved performance in aquaculture production through progressive rotational crossbreeding, said method comprising: (a) deriving multiple semi-inbred core lines of diploid mollusks that are derived from independent source populations of diploid mollusks which are progressively improved through strong individual selection; (b) preventing severe inbreeding or complete loss of said multiple semi-inbred core lines through a bridging line that is produced by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core line and the source population and strong individual selection; and (c) rotating the multiple semi-inbred core lines for crossing with a production line so that genetic diversity and heterosis in the production line are sustained.

2. A diploid mollusk exhibiting improved performance in aquaculture production, said mollusk produced in accordance with the method of claim 1.

3. A method for producing a tetraploid mollusk with improved performance in aquaculture production through coalesced interploidy breeding, said method comprising: producing mated tetraploids by tetraploidtetraploid crosses and subjecting the mated tetraploids to strong individual selection; producing triploids by crossing tetraploids and diploids to bring in one new set of chromosomes into triploids and subjecting said produced triploids to strong individual selection; producing de novo tetraploids by mating selected triploids and selected diploids followed by polar body I inhibition and subjecting the produced tetraploids to strong individual selection; and crossing de novo tetraploids with mated tetraploids to produce tetraploids that contain increased genetic diversity and favorable genes selected from the diploid, triploid and tetraploid phases.

4. A tetraploid mollusk with improved genetic diversity and performance, said mollusk produced in accordance with the method of claim 3.

5. A method for producing a triploid mollusk, said method comprising crossing a tetraploid mollusk with a diploid mollusk of claim 2.

6. A method for producing a triploid mollusk, said method comprising crossing a tetraploid mollusk of claim 4 with a diploid mollusk produced by a method comprising: (a) deriving multiple semi-inbred core lines of diploid mollusks that are derived from independent source populations of diploid mollusk which are progressively improved through strong individual selection; (b) preventing severe inbreeding or complete loss of said multiple semi-inbred core lines is prevented through a bridging line that is produced by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core line and the source population, and strong individual selection; and (c) rotating the multiple semi-inbred core lines for crossing with the production line so that genetic diversity and heterosis in the production line are sustained.

7. A method for producing a triploid mollusk, said method comprising crossing a diploid mollusk with a tetraploid mollusk of claim 4.

8. A triploid mollusk produced in accordance with the method of claim 5.

9. A triploid mollusk produced in accordance with the method of claim 6.

10. A triploid mollusk produced in accordance with the method of claim 7.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

12. The method of claim 3 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

13. The method of claim 5 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

14. The method of claim 6 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

15. The method of claim 7 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

16. The diploid mollusk of claim 2 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

17. The tetraploid mollusk of claim 4 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

18. The triploid mollusk of claim 8 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

19. The triploid mollusk of claim 9 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

20. The triploid mollusk of claim 10 wherein the mollusk is an oyster.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0016] FIG. 1 provides a diagram of a nonlimiting embodiment of progressive rotational crossing (PRC) used in the present invention where each of the core lines (A, B, and C) are derived from a different population, progressively improved by strong selection and rotated for crossing with the production line (P). To prevent severe inbreeding and complete failure, each core line is supported with a more heterozygous bridging line that is produced by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core line and the source population.

[0017] FIG. 2 provides a diagram of a nonlimiting embodiment of coalesced interploidy breeding (CIB) used in the present invention encompassing diploid (2N), triploid (3N) and tetraploid (4N) phases. The dash lines represent the production of de novo tetraploids by inhibiting polar body I in eggs of triploids fertilized by sperm from diploids. Each CIB cycle brings two sets of chromosomes from different diploid lines into de novo tetraploids through a triploid phase, where genes supporting superior triploids are enriched and brought into tetraploids.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0018] Disclosed herein are methods for the improvement of molluscan shellfish in diploid, tetraploid and triploid forms and molluscan shellfish improved in accordance with these methods. Methods for crossbreeding mollusks of the present invention do not rely on the use of pure or inbred lines. Instead the methods and mollusks of the present invention exhibiting improved performance in aquaculture production are produced via progressive rotational crossbreeding and/or coalesced interploidy breeding. In one nonlimiting embodiment, the mollusk is an oyster.

[0019] The present invention provides a method for breeding diploid mollusks with improved performance in aquaculture production through progressive rotational crossbreeding.

[0020] The method referred to herein as progressive rotational crossbreeding or PRC utilizes and sustains genetic diversity for progressive improvement of multiple core lines for rotational crossbreeding. By multiple, as used herein, it is meant 3 or more core lines. Genetic diversity is maintained through bridging lines that are producing through progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core lines and source populations. Progressive improvements are achieved by applying strong individual selection to both core and bridging lines. The rotational crossing retains genetic diversity and heterosis in the production line. The PRC process comprises a minimum of three independent core lines (A, B and C) and a production line (P) that are used for commercial production. In the nonlimiting embodiment depicted in FIG. 1, the three core lines are rotated for crossing with the production line to maintain genetic diversity and heterosis. The core lines are genetically independent and derived from different source populations or unrelated individuals from the same source population. In this nonlimiting embodiment, the core lines are progressively improved in each generation by applying strong individual selection by selecting, for example, the top 10% performers as parents. Each of the core lines is supported by a bridging line (A.sup.+, B.sup.+ or C.sup.+) to maintain genetic diversity.

[0021] In one nonlimiting embodiment, the bridging lines are produced by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core lines and their perspective source populations in the following steps: 1) F1s are produced by crossing the core line and a source population to bring in new genetic material; 2) F2s are produced by crossing F1s to expose homozygotes of both favorable and deleterious alleles to selection; and 3) F2s are backcrossed to the core line producing the backcross (BC) followed by a within-line (BCBC) cross until the bridging line's performance is comparable to that of the core line. At each step of this nonlimiting embodiment, strong selection is applied by selecting, for example, the top 10% performers as parents. All crosses are factorial using at least 25 females and 25 males to maintain genetic diversity. Strong selection is balanced with the new genetic material from the bridging lines to prevent severe inbreeding and complete failure of the core lines.

[0022] Accordingly, in this method of the present invention for breeding diploid mollusks with improved performance in aquaculture production, multiple semi-inbred core lines of diploid mollusks are derived from independent source populations of diploid mollusks which are progressively improved through strong individual selection. The method further comprises preventing severe inbreeding or complete loss of the multiple semi-inbred core lines through a bridging line that is produced by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core line and the source population and strong individual selection. The method further comprises rotating the multiple semi-inbred core lines for crossing with the production line so that genetic diversity and heterosis in the production line are sustained.

[0023] In contrast to traditional rotational crossing, the PRC process does not rely on the use of pure lines which are difficult to sustain in molluscan shellfish. Further, severe inbreeding or complete loss of the core lines is prevented through the use of bridging lines. In addition, both core lines and bridging lines are progressively improved by strong individual selection. Because the core lines are heterozygous or semi-inbred and genetically independent, the PRC method allows progressive improvement of the core lines through selection, while maintaining genetic diversity and heterosis. PRC can be used to establish core lines directly from wild populations and progressively improve them for rotational crossbreeding.

[0024] The present invention also provides methods for producing tetraploid mollusks with improved performance in aquaculture production through coalesced interploidy breeding.

[0025] The method referred to herein as coalesced interploidy breeding or CIB maintains genetic diversity through systematic integration of selective breeding across the diploid, triploid and tetraploid phases. CIB provides a mechanism where improvements in the diploid and triploid phases are systematically brought into the tetraploid lines for the production of improved triploids. In one nonlimiting embodiment, the method comprises producing mated tetraploids by tetraploidtetraploid crosses and subjecting the mated tetraploids to strong individual selection. In another embodiment, triploids are produced by crossing tetraploids and diploids to bring in one new set of chromosomes into triploids followed by subjecting the triploids to strong individual selection. In yet another nonlimiting embodiment, de novo tetraploids are produced by mating selected triploids and selected diploids followed by polar body I inhibition and subjecting the produced tetraploids to strong individual selection. In this nonlimiting embodiment, the de novo tetraploids can be crossed with mated tetraploids to produce improved tetraploids that contain increased genetic diversity and favorable genes selected from the diploid, triploid and tetraploid phases. Tetraploid molluscan shellfish are improved through CIB. After the production of the first-generation tetraploids, tetraploids are mated with tetraploids to produce the next generation of mated tetraploids. At the same time, tetraploids are crossed with newly improved diploids in rotation to produce mated triploids. A nonlimiting exemplary diagram of the CIB process is depicted in FIG. 2. In this process, both tetraploids and triploids are subjected to strong individual selection by selecting, for example, the top 10% performers. Eggs from the best-performing triploid females are mated with selected males from another diploid line for de novo production of tetraploids by inhibiting the release of polar body I. The de novo tetraploids are selected and crossed with mated tetraploids, completing a CIB cycle of integrating selection from diploid, triploid and tetraploid phases. The cycle is repeated using diploids from different core lines in rotation. In each breeding cycle, two sets of new genes are introduced to de novo tetraploids through a triploid phase, where selection brings genes supporting superior triploids into tetraploids. All crosses are made with at least 25 females and 25 males. While the production of mated and de novo tetraploids are known, no systematic coalescence of interploidy breeding of shellfish has been reported. By using the CIB method in accordance with the present invention, selection at different ploidy levels can be systematically integrated and favorable genes from each ploidy level are brought into tetraploids through selection and coalescence. CIB solves the problem that triploids, the cultured stock, cannot be directly improved since triploids are mostly sterile. CIB utilizes the best-performing triploids to produce tetraploids that in turn produce improved triploids. Tetraploids are also improved through 4N4N crosses so that genes desirable for tetraploids are also selected or enriched.

[0026] The present invention also provides methods for producing improved triploid mollusks. Triploids are produced by 2N4N crosses. Improved triploids in accordance with the present invention can be produced via crossing of any tetraploid mollusk with a diploid mollusk produced in accordance with progressive rotational crossbreeding as disclosed herein. Improved triploid mollusks can also be produced in accordance with the present invention via crossing of any diploid mollusk with a tetraploid mollusk produced in accordance with coalesced interploidy breeding as disclosed herein. Further, improved triploid mollusks can be produced in accordance with the present invention via crossing of a diploid mollusk produced in accordance with progressive rotational crossbreeding as disclosed herein and a tetraploid mollusk produced in accordance with coalesced interploidy breeding as disclosed herein.

[0027] As demonstrated herein, diploid, triploid and tetraploid forms of molluscan shellfish produced in accordance with the PRC and/or CIB methods disclosed herein exhibit significant improvement in performance in aquaculture production.

[0028] For purposes of the present invention, by improved performance in aquaculture production it is meant that the molluscan shellfish produced in accordance with the methods disclosed herein exhibit one or more of faster growth and/or increased effective yield and/or increased length, width, height and/or weight, and/or greater resistance as determined by higher survival to diseases as compared to molluscan shellfish not prepared by the methods disclosed herein. For purposes of the present invention, by strong individual selection it is meant that the top percentage of performers as molluscan shellfish are selected. In one nonlimiting embodiment, the top 10% performers are selected. For purposes of the present invention, top performance is generally measured by one or more of faster growth and/or increased effective yield and/or increased length, width, height and/or weight, and/or higher survival to diseases as compared to other molluscan shellfish of the same species.

[0029] For purposes of the present invention, by favorable genes it is meant genes which produce molluscan shellfish exhibiting one or more of faster growth and/or increased effective yield and/or increased length, width, height and/or weight and/or greater resistance as determined by higher survival to diseases as compared to other molluscan shellfish of the same species.

[0030] The following nonlimiting examples are provided to further illustrate the present invention. These examples are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Improved Diploid Eastern Oysters Produced by Progressive Rotational Crossbreeding

[0031] Improved diploid eastern oysters were produced using the method of PRC as depicted in FIG. 1. Three independent core lines, NEF, NEG and NEH, were established through progressive selection starting with wild oysters from Long Island Sound (LIS). All lines were selected for fast growth and higher survival under two diseases, MSX and Dermo. NEH is an existing line from long-term selective breeding with new genetic material from LIS incorporated through a bridging line (Ford and Haskin Journal of Parasitology 1987 73:268-376; Guo et al. J. Shellfish Res. 2003 22(1):333-334). NEF were established in 2001 with about 12.5% new genetic material from Maine added through a bridging line. NEG were established in 2004 with about 12.5% genetic material from Louisiana added through a bridging line. The bridging lines were established by progressive crossing and backcrossing between the core lines and source populations following steps described above. The bridging lines were subjected to strong selection and brought into the core lines when their performance was comparable to that of the core lines.

[0032] For each cross, about 50 oysters (25 males and 25 females), representing the largest 10% of the cohort, were used as parents to produce the next generation by factorial crossing. Eggs from the females were pooled and then divided into equal aliquots, each fertilized with a male in separate beakers. Thirty minutes after fertilization, fertilized eggs were pooled and incubated in duplicate 200-1 tanks at 50 eggs/ml. At 48 hours post-fertilization, D-stage larvae were collected, counted and cultured in 200-1 tanks at a density of 10 larvae/ml. Larvae were cultured and single oyster spat were produced with standard hatchery protocols (Guo et al. Aquaculture 1996 142:149-161). Single spat from each line were deployed in three or four replicate bags for field evaluation.

[0033] A rotational cross was made by mating the production line NEX with NEH. At 18 months of age, oysters from the new production line were significantly (p<0.01, t-test) larger than that from the three core lines and wild controls. There was no significant difference in survival between the production line and the core lines at 18 months of age. The effective yield (average body weightsurvival) of the production line is 17-42% higher than the core lines and 121% higher than the wild control thus demonstrating improvement in the production line NEX produced by PRC of the present invention.

[0034] Body size, survival and effective yield of three core lines (NEF, NEG and NEH) and the production line NEX produced by progressive'rotational crossbreeding at 18 months of age, with unselected wild oysters as control are depicted in Table 1. Numbers in parenthesis are standard error of the mean.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Height Body Weight Survival Yield Lines n (mm) (g) (%) (g) NEF 100 67.5 (0.8) 38.4 (0.9) 87.5 33.6 NEG 100 62.4 (0.8) 34.3 (0.9) 80.9 27.7 NEH 100 70.1 (0.9) 36.5 (1.1) 89.6 32.7 Production line NEX 98 73.4 (1.0) 43.0 (1.1) 91.5 39.3 Wild control 100 51.1 (0.6) 23.1 (0.6) 76.9 17.8

Example 2

Improved Tetraploid and Triploid Eastern Oysters Produced by Coalesced Interploidy Breeding

[0035] The performance of tetraploid and triploid oysters was improved using CIB. The first generation of tetraploids was produced by inhibiting polar body I in 3N female2N male crosses (Guo and Allen Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 1994 3(1):42-50). Mated tetraploids were subsequently produced by 4N4N crosses. Triploids referred to herein as 2005 were produced by mating diploid females with F2 tetraploid males, and F3 mated tetraploids were produced from 4N4N crossing of F2 tetraploids. At 6 months of age, F3 mated tetraploids were about the same size as diploids but smaller than triploids (Table 2).

[0036] CIB was conducted in the following sequences. First, triploids were produced by crossing tetraploids with improved diploids from a different core line so that one set of new chromosomes were introduced into triploids (FIG. 2). After field exposure to diseases and mortalities, the best-performing triploids (largest 10% of survivors) were selected to produce de novo tetraploids by inhibiting polar body I in 3N female2N male crosses. Inhibition of polar body I was achieved by treating newly fertilized eggs with cytochalasin B, 6-(dimethylamino)purine or heat shock. Concurrently, mated tetraploids were produced by 4N4N crosses and subjected to strong selection (largest 10% among survivors). After strong selection, de novo and mated tetraploids were crossed to produce the next generation of tetraploids, completing one round of CIB (FIG. 2). Each round of CIB involved crossing with diploids from two different lines, bringing two sets of chromosomes into de novo tetraploids, which in turn brings one set of chromosomes into the tetraploid line by crossing with mated tetraploids.

[0037] After two rounds of CIB, triploids and tetraploids referred to herein as 2016 showed significant (p<0.001, t-test) improvement in growth or body size. At 6 months of age, the 2016 tetraploids were 250% heavier than diploids, where the 2005 tetraploid before CIB was about the same as diploids (Table 2). The 2016 triploids were 88% heavier than diploids, while the 2005 triploids were 50% heavier than diploids (Table 2). The diploid controls also exhibited significantly improvements. The 2016 triploids produced by CIB were 78% heavier than the 2015 triploids produced without CIB. This example shows that tetraploids produced by CIB are significantly improved, and triploids produced from improved tetraploids and diploids are also significantly improved.

[0038] Body size of 6-month old triploids (3N), tetraploids (4N) and diploid (2N) controls before (lines 2005) and after (lines 2016) two rounds of coalesced interplay breeding in accordance with the present invention are depicted in Table 2. Numbers in parenthesis are standard error of the mean.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Height Length Width Weight Lines n (mm) (mm) (mm) (g) 2005: 2N 84 20.6 (0.5) 14.5 (0.3) 6.3 (0.1) 1.2 (0.1) 2005: 3N 94 22.9 (0.5) 15.7 (0.3) 7.4 (0.1) 1.8 (0.1) 2005: 4N 30 19.6 (0.7) 13.7 (0.5) 6.0 (0.2) 1.0 (0.1) 2016: 2N 96 29.4 (0.9) 20.9 (0.3) 8.4 (0.1) 3.2 (0.2) 2016: 3N 90 40.9 (0.8) 26.9 (0.3) 10.1 (0.1) 6.0 (0.3) 2016: 4N 30 49.4 (1.0) 33.1 (0.7) 12.4 (0.3) 11.2 (0.6)