Biological Toxicity Test Method for Evaluating the Ecological Safety of Advanced Oxidation Processes

Abstract

A biological toxicity test method for evaluating an ecological safety of an advanced oxidation process comprising the following steps: (1) collecting (preparing) a waste water to be determined; (2) collecting the waste water and a tap water after the advanced oxidation process treatment; (3) subjecting Koi (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus) to the water after treatment for exposure to poison; (4) Determining an anti-oxidation enzyme activity of a liver of the Koi after exposure; (5) Data analyzing. By comparing the changes of liver enzyme activities in different water, the present method evaluates the toxicity changes of micro-pollutant containing water before and after treatment, which fills in the gap of the ecological risk assessment for advanced oxidation technology.

Claims

1. A biological toxicity test method for evaluating ecological safety of an advanced oxidation process, comprising the following steps: collecting a waste water to be determined; S2: subjecting the waste water and a tap water to an advanced oxidation process treatment, respectively and setting up a blank control to establish four groups of experimental pools, namely a waste water control group, a waste water experimental group, a tap water blank group, and a tap water experimental group; S3: putting Koi (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus) into the experimental pools after treatment; S4: dissecting, after farming for a period of time, the fish in each experimental group separately, and extracting liver and formulating into a homogenate to determine an activity of antioxidative enzymes in the homogenate; S5: conducting intragroup data comparison for the determined data of the homogenate in each group to obtain an average value of biological indicators of various antioxidative enzymes and the like, plotting a histogram according to the average value of each biological indicator in each group, comparing the histogram for each biological indicator to evaluate the tested advanced oxidation process.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said waste water in S1 refers to a simulated waste water containing micro-contaminants or a secondary effluent from secondary sewage plants.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the advanced oxidation process in S2 refers to a hydroxyl (.OH) based or a sulfate radical (SO.sub.4.sup..) or a chlorine radical (Cl.) based higher oxidation technology, including but not limited to UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2, UV/persulfate, UV/ClO.sub.2.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein in the experimental groups in S2, the collected waste water is divided into a raw waste water and an experimental waste water, the collected tap water is divided into a control tap water and a blank tap water, and the experimental waste water and the control tap water are both subjected to an advanced oxidation process treatment.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method for establishing the experimental pool in S3 is: a water temperature of the experimental pool is 18 C.-22 C., a depth of water is 1.2 m, and each experimental pool is provided with an aerator.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein 20 selected Koi are put into each experimental pool in S3 for exposure to poison, and an exposure time is 96 h-110 h.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method in S4 is specifically: dissecting the Koi after exposure to poison in each group and extracting liver, chopping, and formulating into a homogenate with the liver tissue and physiological saline according to weight (g): volume (mL)=1:9 and determining the activity of antioxidative enzymes in the homogenate.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determined antioxidative enzyme in S4 comprises superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determined enzyme activities in S4 are determined using a kit, and 5 parallel group assays are set for each sample group.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] FIG. 1 is an experimental flow chart of the present invention;

[0026] FIG. 2a is a histogram of catalase (CAT) activity of each experimental group in Example 1 of the present invention;

[0027] FIG. 2b is a glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity in Example 1 of the present invention;

[0028] FIG. 2c is a superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of each experimental group in Example 1 of the present invention;

[0029] FIG. 3a is the catalase (CAT) activity of each experimental group in Example 3 of the present invention;

[0030] FIG. 3b is the glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity of each experimental group in Example 3 of the present invention;

[0031] FIG. 3c is the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of each experimental group in Example 3 of the present invention;

[0032] FIG. 4a is the catalase (CAT) activity of each experimental group in Example 4 of the present invention;

[0033] FIG. 4b is the glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity of each experimental group in Example 4 of the present invention;

[0034] FIG. 4c is the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity of each experimental group in Example 4 of the present invention.

EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Example 1

[0035] In this embodiment, the waste water containing a non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug and a UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2 process are taken as subjects and specifically described. As shown in FIG. 1, the biological toxicity test method for evaluating the ecological safety of the UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2 process comprises the following steps:

[0036] S1: the waste water to be determined was collected (prepared), resulting in inaccurate test results. Four groups of experimental pools were established, namely a waste water control group, a waste water experimental group, a tap water blank group, a tap water experimental group, and 1 M non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen was added to the four experimental groups.

[0037] S2: an H.sub.2O.sub.2 solution was added to the waste water experimental group and the tap water control group so that the molar ratio of H.sub.2O.sub.2 to the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug was 1:100, and the reaction solution was irradiated with UV for 30 minutes. Four groups of identical experimental pools were established. Each group of the experimental pools was provided with 3 parallel groups. The size of each experimental pool was unified to 30 L. The temperature of the experimental pool water was 18 C. to 22 C. Each experimental pool was provided with an aerator. The first group of the experimental pools was the waste water control group, the second group was the waste water group, the third group was the tap water control group, and the fourth group was the tap water blank group. The four groups of experimental pools had same conditions except the addition of different water quality. 25 L of raw waste water, experimental waste water, control tap water, and blank tap water were sequentially added to the experimental pool of the waste water control group, the waste water experimental group, the tap water control group, and the tap water control group.

[0038] S3: 20 selected Koi were put into each experimental pool for exposure to poison. The Koi used for the test were those domesticated with tap water and not poisoned by the contaminants. The exposure time was 96 hours. During the period of exposure, half water was changed every day with water of same quality to maintain the water quality in a stable condition.

[0039] S4: each group of Koi after exposure in the step S3 was dissected and extracted for liver tissue, chopped, and formulated to a homogenate with the liver tissue and physiological saline according to weight (g): volume (mL)=1:9. Antioxidative enzyme activity was determined in the homogenate. The antioxidative enzymes determined comprised superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase.

[0040] S5: the data in the three experimental pools in each group of experiments was compared, firstly data anomalies in a certain experimental pool was eliminated, and then all data in the rest experimental pools were subjected to removal of abnormal data, and the remaining data were rearranged; the out-of-group comparison method is specifically: the statistics of the data after rearranging of each experimental group were collected, and then the average value of all the data in each experimental group was taken, the abnormal data was eliminated first, and then the normal data was averaged. Then FIG. 2a, FIG. 2b, and FIG. 2c were plotted sequentially according to the average values of catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in each group of experiments. The histograms of various antioxidative enzymes were evaluated for the selected UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2 process.

[0041] Among them, FIG. 2a, FIG. 2b, and FIG. 2c are the results of the determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT) activity in each experimental group. The entry of harmful substances into living organisms will result in the accumulation of active oxygen, and the 3 antioxidative enzymes of SOD, CAT and GPx act synergically to eliminate the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species in the body. SOD is firstly involved in the scavenging of reactive oxygen species, which may catalyze the decomposition of superoxide anions into H.sub.2O.sub.2. This is the first step in the antioxidant defense mechanism, followed by CAT and GPx intervention to convert the H.sub.2O.sub.2 produced into H.sub.2O and O.sub.2. CAT mainly attaches to peroxisomes, and its main function is to reduce H.sub.2O.sub.2 produced by metabolism of long-chain fatty acids on peroxisomes, while CAT plays a dual role in the catalytic reduction of H.sub.2O.sub.2 and lipid peroxides. The different reaction mechanisms of CAT and GPx represent two pathways for active oxygen removal. Generally, when organisms are under mild reactive oxygen stress, SOD and CAT activities are increased to accelerate the removal of reactive oxygen species in the body; while severe and prolonged active oxygen stress may exceed the balance regulation ability of the organism's antioxidant defense system, such that the activity of SOD and CAT are reduced, which results in accumulation of reactive oxygen species in the living body and leads to oxidative damage in the organism.

[0042] It is known from FIGS. 2a, 2b, and 2c, the activities of SOD, GPx, and CAT in experimental group 2 and experimental group 3 are inhibited, and the SOD, GPx, and CAT activities in experimental group 2 are more significantly suppressed than those in experimental group 3. This shows that the toxicity of the waste water with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug increases after UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2 treatment. The SOD activity of experimental group 1 is higher than that of the fourth group, namely the blank group. The GPx activity is lower than that of the blank group but there is no significant difference, indicating that the oxidant H.sub.2O.sub.2 in UV/H.sub.2O.sub.2 also produces oxidative stress on the koi.

Example 2

[0043] Effect of the duration of exposure to poison:

[0044] Example 1 was taken as a reference, and four control groups were set up. The rest of the conditions were the same. The duration of exposure to poison was shown in Table 3:

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Duration of exposure in each group Group Duration (h) Example 1 98 Comparative Example 1 96 Comparative Example 2 110 Comparative Example 3 90 Comparative Example 4 112

[0045] The test results show that the results of Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 2 are basically the same as that of Example 1, and there is no difference. The difference between the enzyme activity values of the experimental groups in Comparative Example 3 and the blank control group is small. It may be that the exposure time is not enough, the amount of active oxygen accumulation is not enough, and the damage to the Koi is not obvious; deaths to some of the Koi occur in Comparative Example 4, which may be due to the exposure time is too long.

[0046] The results show that when the duration of exposure is in the range of 96-110 h, the test data has higher sensitivity and better accuracy. When the duration of exposure is less than 96 hours, the test data has lower sensitivity, and the accuracy is not high. When the duration of exposure is longer than 110 hours, some of the Koi may die, leading to inaccurate test results.

Example 3

[0047] The difference between the present example and Example 1 lies in that the present example takes a papermaking waste water and an ozone combined oxidation process as the subjects, and all the other parameters and methods are the same as those in Example 1.

[0048] The test results are somewhat different from those of Example 1, as shown in FIGS. 3a, 3b, and 3c. It is known from FIG. 3a, FIG. 3b, and FIG. 3c, the activities of SOD, GPx, and CAT in experimental group 2 and experimental group 3 are inhibited, and the SOD, GPx, and CAT activities of the experimental group 2 are more significantly suppressed than those of the experimental group 3. The results show that the toxicity of papermaking waste water is increased after the ozone combined oxidation process. The SOD activity of experimental group 1 is higher than that of the fourth group, namely the blank group. The GPx activity is lower than that of the blank group but there is no significant difference, indicating that the oxidant H.sub.2O.sub.2 in the ozone combined oxidation process also produces oxidative stress on the Koi. It may be due to the fact that there is a certain difference between each pollutant species in the papermaking waste water and Example 1, but the histograms of various antioxidative enzymes in each of the experimental groups are basically consistent with those of Example 1.

[0049] The results show that the method of the present invention is also applicable to the evaluation of the treatment results of papermaking waste water by the ozone combined oxidation process.

Example 4

[0050] The difference between the present example and Example 1 lies in that the present example takes a VC waste water and a wet oxidation process as the subjects, and all other parameters and methods are the same as those in Example 1.

[0051] The test results are somewhat different from those of Example 1, as shown in FIGS. 4a, 4b and 4c. It is known from FIG. 4a, FIG. 4b and FIG. 4c, the activities of SOD, GPx and CAT in experimental group 2 and experimental group 3 are inhibited, and the SOD, GPx, and CAT activities of the experimental group 2 are more significantly suppressed than those of the experimental group 3. The results show that the toxicity of the VC waste water after the wet oxidation process is increased. The SOD activity of experimental group 1 is higher than that of the fourth group, namely the blank group. The GPx activity is lower than the blank group but there is no significant difference, indicating that the oxidant H.sub.2O.sub.2 in the wet oxidation process also produces oxidative stress on the Koi. It may be due to the fact that there is a certain difference between each pollutant species in the VC waste water and Example 1, but the histograms of various antioxidative enzymes in each of the experimental groups are basically consistent with those of Example 1.

[0052] The results show that the method of the present invention is also applicable for the evaluation of the treatment results of VC waste water in a wet oxidation process.

[0053] The above description of the embodiments is only for the purpose of understanding the method of the present invention and its core idea. It is noted that those skilled in the art can make several improvements and modifications to the present invention without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these improvements and modifications will also fall within the protection scope of the present invention.