Hard candy with reduced sugar

Abstract

A low cariogenic, low-laxation hard candy product having acceptable clarity and cold flow stability, contains a bulking sweetener agent, comprising isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol or combinations thereof and a doctoring agent, comprising inulin, indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, polydextrose, or combinations thereof; wherein the bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent ratio is 70/30 to 40/60 dry solids wt. %.

Claims

1. A hard candy composition, comprising: a) a bulking sweetener agent, consisting of isomaltulose, erythritol or combinations thereof; and b) a doctoring agent, consisting of inulin; wherein the bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent ratio is 70/30 to 40/60 dry solids wt. %.

2. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the hard candy comprises at least 95 wt. % combined bulking sweetener agent and doctoring agent, and not more than 5 wt. % water.

3. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the bulking sweetener agent is isomaltulose, and the inulin is selected from the group consisting of branched inulin and linear inulin.

4. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the bulking sweetener agent is erythritol, and the inulin is selected from the group consisting of branched inulin and linear inulin.

5. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the bulking sweetener agent is erythritol.

6. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the doctoring agent is branched inulin.

7. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the doctoring agent is linear inulin.

8. The hard candy composition of claim 1, further comprising an additional ingredient selected from the group consisting of a high intensity sweetener, flavor, citric acid, and combinations thereof.

9. The hard candy composition of claim 1, wherein the hard candy composition is clear and storage stable.

10. A hard candy composition, consisting essentially of: a) a bulking sweetener agent, consisting of isomaltulose, erythritol or combinations thereof; and b) a doctoring agent, consisting of inulin; wherein the bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent ratio is 70/30 to 40/60 dry solids wt. %.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(1) In aspects of this invention, certain bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents are incorporated into a hard candy, such that the final hard candy product has acceptable clarity, cold flow and stickiness formation stability, while being less cariogenic than traditional sucrose and corn syrup hard candy, and while not causing gastrointestinal disturbances.

(2) More specifically, this invention relates to improved formulations for hard candy containing bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent ratio of 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. % and containing not more than 70 dry solids wt. % sucrose, and containing no corn syrup, and the bulking sweetener agent comprising isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol, or combinations thereof, and the doctoring agent comprising of inulin, indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, polydextrose or combinations thereof.

(3) A bulking sweetener agent is included in the hard candy of this invention for volume, bulk, hardness, and syrup formation (i.e., as the hard candy is dissolved). The bulking sweetener agents of this invention have a tendency to quickly crystallize, which would make an unacceptable hard candy due to its lack of clarity unless the crystallization is controlled. The doctoring agent is included in the hard candy of this invention to prevent the bulking sweetener agent from crystallizing, while not preventing candy mass from hardening, and to absorb moisture present in the hard candy, so that the hard candy has a cold flow and stickiness formation stability of at least that of sucrose:corn syrup hard candy of a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio. Typically, hard candy products, contain sucrose as the bulking sweetener agent and corn syrup as the doctoring agent.

(4) Besides the bulking sweetener agent and doctoring agent, other ingredients are commonly added to hard candy including, but not limited to, flavors, acids, sensates, cooling agents, active ingredients (e.g. drugs and mendicants), and colors. High intensity sweeteners (HIS) can be added to increase the hard candy sweetness level, in particular when the bulking sweetener agent is less sweet than sucrose.

(5) Just shifting the proportion of sucrose to corn syrup in the hard candy formula so that the hard candy contains less sucrose is not a useful option towards reducing product cariogenicity. Corn syrup also contains sucrose. Also, there is a necessary balance to the amount of bulking sweetener agent to the amount of doctoring agent, in order to have a candy that is hard and is stable to cold flow and stickiness formation. Typical sucrose and corn syrup hard candy has a ratio of sucrose to corn syrup of 80:20 dry solids wt. %. Hard candy with ratios of sucrose to corn syrup of 60:40 and 40:60 dry solids wt. % can have less sucrose crystal growth, but the hard candy is usually more susceptible to cold flow and surface stickiness formation than that with the 80:20 ratio.

(6) Typically, when the ratio of sucrose to corn syrup is 80:20 dry solids wt. %, the resulting hard candy has a cold flow and stickiness formation stability that has been found commercially acceptable. Reduction in the sucrose to a weight ratio of 60:40 or 40:60 sucrose to corn syrup creates a reduction in stability to cold flow and stickiness formation. This is also true when the sucrose is replaced with other sugars such as dextrose, fructose, or maltose. Sucrose, dextrose, fructose, maltose, and corn syrup are cariogenic, that is, they create dental caries.

(7) In efforts to make non-cariogenic hard candy, sorbitol and isomalt are polyols that have been combined with hydrogenated starch hydrolysate (HSH) to make hard candy. Though these polyols are non-cariogenic, unfortunately, they can create gastrointestinal disturbances (i.e. laxation).

(8) The problem is how to create hard candy with the clarity and stability of traditional sucrose and corn syrup hard candy, and yet have less cariogenicity and no gastrointestinal disturbance. The solution is hard candy made with a bulking sweetener agent where some or all of the sucrose is replaced with isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol or combinations thereof and the corn syrup doctoring agent is replaced with inulin, indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, polydextrose, or combinations thereof, and the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. % and the resulting hard candy contains not more than 70 dry solids wt. % sucrose, preferably not more than 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose, and no corn syrup.

(9) As the goal is to make a hard candy without intestinal disturbance and with less cariogenicity than sucrose, but with acceptable cold flow and stickiness formation stability, the choices for bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents is limited. Non-limiting examples of bulking sweetener agents are isomaltulose, trehalose, and erythritol. Non-limiting examples of doctoring agents are inulin (linear and branched), indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, and polydextrose.

(10) Isomaltulose is a sugar that can be used as a bulking sweetener agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Isomaltulose (also called palatinose) is a reducing glucose-fructose disaccharide in which glucose and fructose are linked through their respective 1 and 6 carbon atoms. Isomaltulose commercially is produced enzymatically from sucrose. Because isomaltulose is digested much slower than sucrose, isomaltulose has a lower glycemic response than sucrose making it acceptable to diabetics. Isomaltulose is tooth friendly due to its slow digestion in the mouth. Isomaltulose is non-laxative, and non-cariogenic, even though it is a sugar. The challenge with isomaltulose is that it is very fast crystallizing from a supersaturated solution or amorphous glass state. A suitable doctoring agent is needed to control the crystallization.

(11) Trehalose is a sugar that also can be used as a bulking sweetener agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Trehalose, also known as mycose or tremalose, is a natural alpha-linked disaccharide formed by an ,-1,1-glucoside bond between two -glucose units, giving it the name of -D-glucopyranosyl-(1.fwdarw.1)--D-glucopyranoside. The bonding makes trehalose very resistant to acid hydrolysis. Trehalose is non-laxative and non-cariogenic, even though it is a sugar. The challenge with Trehalose is that a boiled and cooled trehalose solution does not tend to create a hard candy with a texture similar to that of traditional sucrose and corn syrup candy unless it is combined with another bulking sweetener agent, such as erythritol.

(12) Erythritol is a polyol that can be used as a bulking sweetener agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Erythritol is a four-carbon sugar alcohol (i.e., polyol). Erythritol is produced from glucose by fermentation with the yeast, Moniliella pollinis. Erythritol is absorbed into the bloodstream in the small intestine. Because erythritol is absorbed before it enters the large intestine, it does not normally cause the laxative effects that are often experienced with consumption of other polyols, such as sorbitol, maltitol, isomalt and xylitol. Erythritol can not be metabolized by oral bacteria, so it does not contribute to tooth decay. Erythritol can be used to make hard candy that is non-cariogenic and non-laxative. A challenge with erythritol is that it crystallizes very quickly from a supersaturated syrup or amorphous glass state. Erythritol needs a suitable doctoring agent to control the crystallization so that a hard, clear candy can be produced which will be storage stable.

(13) Inulin is a material that can be used as a doctoring agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Inulin is a group of oligosaccharides occurring naturally in many plants and belongs to a class of carbohydrates called fructans. Inulin is a prebiotic fermentable fiber and is metabolized by gut flora yields short chain fatty acids, which are reported to increase absorption of calcium, magnesium, and iron. Inulin also promotes an increase in the mass and health of intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations. Inulin is composed of linear chains of fructose units linked by (2.fwdarw.1) bonds and is often terminated by a glucose unit. Suitable inulins useful in this invention typically contain chains of around 3 to 60 fructose units. Inulin sources contain polymers in a distribution of chain lengths, which are described by their DP (number of sugar units). Typically short chain linear inulin has DP<20 and long chain linear inulin has DP>20. Typically, linear inulin material is in a long chain form, though other length variations are available. A typical long chain linear inulin source, such as Beneo HP inulin supplied by Orafti, has an average DP>23, creating an inulin material with long polymer chains. A typical short chain linear inulin source, such as DeSugar Inulin supplied by Cargill, has an average DP=10, creating a inulin material with short polymer chains. A branched inulin (also called phlein), such as BoiAgave, supplied by GTC Nutrition, has a high degree of polymerization. Inulin has a minimal impact on blood sugar and does not raise blood triglycerides, making it generally considered suitable for diabetics.

(14) Indigestible dextrin is a material that can be used as a doctoring agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Indigestible dextrin is a group of low molecular weight carbohydrates produced by hydrolysis of starch by acid in a roasting process. These dextrins are mixtures of -(1.fwdarw.4)-linked D-glucose polymers starting with an -(1.fwdarw.6) bond, which are then treated with additional roasting to create branched carbohydrates or pyrodextrins. The dextrins are further treated with enzymes to make them highly branched and virtually indigestible. Indigestible dextrins do not contribute to dental caries (i.e., are non-cariogenic) due to their low reducing sugar levels. They do not cause gastrointestinal disturbances at the levels of use in chewing gum. Typical indigestible dextrins contain about 10 to 30 (preferably 10 to 25) saccharide units. Varieties of such indigestible dextrins are sold under trade names of Fibersol and Nutriose. Fibersol is marketed by Fibersol America, a division of Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Ltd of Hyogo-Pref., Japan. Nutriose is marketed by Roquette Freres, of Lestrem, France.

(15) Polydextrose is a material that can be used as a doctoring agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Polydextrose (available under the trade name Litesse from Danisco) is a soluble, random polymer of dextrose containing minor (less than about 10 wt. %) amounts of sorbitol (at least 2 wt. %) and citric acid. Typical polydextrose polymers contain around 10 to 50 saccharide units, preferably 20 to 40 saccharide units.

(16) Sucomalt is a material that can be used as a doctoring agent to make an acceptable hard candy of this invention. Sucromalt (available under the trade name of Sucomalt from Cargill) is a soluble oligoglucose. Sucromalt does not cause gastrointestinal distress. Currently, sucromalt supplied by Cargill contains about 35% mono- and di-saccharides (e.g., fructose).

(17) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, comprised of at least 95 wt. % solids, wherein the solids comprises bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent in the ratio of 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, wherein the bulking sweetener agent is isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol or combinations thereof, and the doctoring agent is inulin (linear or branched), indigestible dextrin, polydextrose, sucromalt or combinations thereof.

(18) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy containing less than 20 wt. % sucrose, which does not cause intestinal disturbance and is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio.

(19) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy containing less than 70 wt. % sucrose, which does not cause intestinal disturbance and is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio.

(20) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol or combinations thereof, and a doctoring agent comprising inulin (linear or branched), indigestible dextrin, polydextrose, sucromalt of combinations thereof, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio.

(21) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol or combinations thereof, and a doctoring agent comprising inulin (linear or branched), indigestible dextrin, polydextrose, sucromalt of combinations thereof, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio and the hard candy contains less than 70 dry solids wt. % sucrose.

(22) An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising isomaltulose, and a doctoring agent comprising branched inulin, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio and the hard candy contains less than 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose. An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising isomaltulose, and a doctoring agent comprising sucromalt, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio and the hard candy contains less than 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose. An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising trehalose and erythritol, and a doctoring agent comprising inulin and brown rice syrup, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio and the hard candy contains less than 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose. An aspect of the present invention is directed to a hard candy, which contains a bulking sweetener agent comprising trehalose and erythritol, and a doctoring agent comprising inulin, where the ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent is 70:30 to 40:60 dry solids wt. %, and the resulting hard candy is at least as stable to cold flow and stickiness formation as hard candy containing sucrose and corn syrup in a 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio and the hard candy contains less than 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose.

(23) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 40 dry solids wt. % trehalose and at least 40 dry solids wt. % inulin (linear and/or branched).

(24) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 20 dry solids wt. % trehalose, at least 20 dry solids wt. % sucrose, and at least 30 dry solids wt. % branched inulin.

(25) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 50 dry solids wt. % isomaltulose, and at least 20 dry solids wt. % branched inulin.

(26) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 50 dry solids wt. % erythritol and at least 20 dry solids wt. % doctoring agent selected from the group consisting of inulin, indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, polydextrose, and combinations thereof.

(27) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 50 dry solids wt. % isomaltulose and at least 20% doctoring agent selected from the group consisting of inulin, indigestible dextrin, sucromalt, polydextrose, and combinations thereof.

(28) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 50 wt. % isomaltulose and at least 25 wt. % indigestible dextrin.

(29) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 25 wt. % trehalose, at least 5 wt. % erythritol, and at least 20 wt. % inulin,

(30) An aspect of the present invention is a hard candy, comprising at least 25 wt. % trehalose, at least 5 wt. % erythritol, and at least 45 wt. % inulin.

(31) Hard candy with less cariogenicity then typical sucrose and corn syrup hard candy (at 80:20 ratio) can be made using combinations of bulking sweetener agents (e.g. isomaltulose, trehalose, erythritol, and combinations thereof) and doctoring agents (e.g. inulin, indigestible dextrin, polydextrose, sucromalt, and combinations thereof) in ratios of 70/30 to 40/60 dry solids wt. %, the resulting hard candy having at least the cold flow and stickiness formation stability of sucrose and corn syrup hard candy at 80:20 ratio.

EXAMPLES AND COMPARATIVE RUNS

(32) The following comparative runs and examples of the invention are provided to illustrate, but not limit, the invention that is defined by the attached claims.

(33) Table 1 gives the formulas for a control (sucrose:corn syrup at 80:20 wt %) and seven alternatives. Samples 2-5: Corn syrup is replaced with linear inulin at various ratios. Samples 6-9: Sucrose is replaced with isomalt and corn syrup is replaced with linear inulin at various ratios.

(34) Surprisingly, the inventor found that inulin was an acceptable doctoring agent (i.e., replacement for corn syrup) in hard candy when the bulking sweetener agent was sucrose or isomalt. This is surprising, as inulin is usually added in chewy candy formulations to supply the flexible material in the candy and to absorb and control high percentages of moisture, while keeping the bulking sweetener agent from hardening. Here inulin does appear to control the moisture in the hard candy, but does not appear to interfere with the bulking sweetener agent's ability to harden.

(35) When corn syrup doctoring agent was replaced with inulin doctoring agent, hard candy made within a range of 80/20 to 40/60 dry solids wt. % bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent, the resulting hard candy was as stable as, or more stable than, hard candy made with sucrose and corn syrup in the ratio of 80/20 wt % after storage at 23 C./50% RH; 45 C./33% RH, and 30 C./70% RH for 8 days. Inulin was able to keep the hygroscopic bulking sweetener agents from crystallizing, and assisted in stabilizing the hard candy from cold flow, particularly at 30 C./70% RH. Inulin is sometimes used in chewy candy to hold moisture in order to give the chewy candy an elastic, bouncy character. Inulin was tested to see what it's effect would be in hard handy. Isomalt was tested to see the effect of using inulin with a known, very hygroscopic sugar-free bulking sweetener agent at different ratios of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent.

(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Formulas: Sucrose and Linear Inulin & Isomalt and Linear Inulin Run # Control: Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Isomalt/ Isomalt/ Isomalt/ Isomalt/ Sucrose/Corn Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Syrup Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (80/20) 1 (80/20) 2 (60/40) 3 (40/60) 4 (20/80) 5 (80/20) 6 (60/40) 7 (40/60) 8 Sugar 79.66 79.65 62.57 43.59 22.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Isomalt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.65 62.57 43.59 Corn syrup 16.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Linear Inulin 0.00 16.52 33.61 52.59 74.03 16.52 33.61 52.59 Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HIS 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Strawberry 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Flavor Citric acid 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 3.74 HIS = high intensity sweetener

(37) The hard candy products made in Table 1 were produced by combining inulin, sucrose or isomalt, and water, heating the combination until the cooked mass reached about 290 F. (143 C.) (no vacuum), adding HIS (high intensity sweeteners), acid and flavor, and then cooling the cooked mass until it had a malleable, plastic-like texture. The cooked mass was finally processed through a drop roller. The resulting hard candy pieces were cooled to room temperature and stored at different temperatures and relative humidities.

(38) Table 1 runs 2 through 8 all had reduced sucrose content from the control due to less sucrose as the bulking sweetener agent and due to less corn syrup as the doctoring agent, which made them less carriogenic than the control. Table 1 runs 3, 4, and 5 were formulated to have corn syrup replaced with inulin. Runs 1, 3, 4, and 5 had different ratios of bulking sweetener agent and doctoring agent. Table 1 runs 6, 7, and 8 were formulated to have the sucrose of the control replaced with isomalt and the corn syrup to be replaced with inulin. Though run 6 contained the same ratio of bulking sweetener agent to doctoring agent as run 1 (control), runs 7 and 8 had different ratios of bulking agent to doctoring agent. All of these formulas made hard candy pieces.

(39) Table 2 includes sensorial test data on runs 1 (control), 3, 4, and 5 after less than a week storage at room 23 C. and 50% RH (i.e. room temperature).

(40) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Sensory Results: Sucrose and Linear Inulin Hard Candy Run # 1 3 4 5 Characteristic Sucrose/Corn Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Syrup Control Linear Inulin Linear Inulin Linear (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Inulin (20/80) Clarity 4.86 5.86 5.71 7.00 Flavor 5.43 5.00 5.43 4.71

(41) The runs in Table 2 were evaluated blind in random order for amount of clarity (1-9, clear to opaque) and amount of flavor delivery (1-9, low to high). 80/20 wt % is a typical ratio of sucrose to corn syrup in a hard candy. By replacing the corn syrup with inulin and varying the ratio of sucrose to doctoring agent, the character of the resulting hard candy changed. In Table 1, the sensory results show that of these runs, 3 and 4 had flavor delivery similar to that of 1 (control), but run 5 had less flavor delivery. The sensory results also show that runs 3 and 4 had clarity less than 1, and run 5 had even less clarity. Though all of these formulas made hard candy pieces, like the control, their character was not always the same as that of the control. In particular, too much doctoring agent can interfere with flavor delivery and clarity.

(42) Table 3 contains shelf life data for runs in Table 1 that were held at 23 C. at 50% RH for 14 days.

(43) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Results: Cold Flow Test - 23 C./50% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 % Change Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear from Day 0 Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin At 14 Days Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Weight 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.9 Width 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Height 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

(44) Runs from Table 1 were stored for 14 days at 23 C./50% RH and then weighed and measured (piece width and height) after 14 days. The data in Table 3 shows that the more inulin in the hard candy, the more water was adsorbed, though this is much more noticeable in the isomalt runs. Isomalt is very hygroscopic. Width and height changes were not appreciable, showing that these runs were all as stable, or more stable, than the control as to cold flow.

(45) Tables 4, 5, and 6 contain cold flow shelf life data for runs in Table 1 that were held at 45 C./33% RH for 8 days.

(46) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Results: Cold Flow Test - 45 C./33% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Weight Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 0.5 0.7 0.6 N/A 0.3 0.4 0.4 Day 6 0.8 1.1 1.0 N/A 0.5 0.6 0.6 Day 8 1.1 1.4 1.2 N/A 0.6 0.8 0.8 N/A = not available

(47) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Results: Cold Flow Test - 45 C./33% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Width Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 35.0 45.8 29.4 41.2 47.3 49.0 48.2 Day 6 45.7 62.0 35.4 52.9 46.8 60.9 53.8 Day 8 51.1 59.2 38.9 57.7 46.1 63.7 54.9

(48) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Cold Flow Test - 45 C./33% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Height Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 34.6 36.9 35.4 36.5 54.2 54.7 42.1 Day 6 48.8 46.0 46.5 34.0 52.0 57.1 51.9 Day 8 57.9 50.0 52.8 48.2 54.4 64.3 58.6 Negative number is due to height decreasing over storage time.

(49) Tables 4, 5, and 6 contain data from runs in Table 1 stored at 45 C./33% RH and then weighed and measured (width and height) on day 3, 6, and 8. The data in Tables 4, 5, and 6 show that the weight change for runs 2-8 was similar to that of the control. The width change for runs 2, 5, 6 and 8 was similar to that of the control. Run 7 was slightly more and run 3 was slightly less than the control. All of the runs had similar height changes to that of the control. Overall, runs 2-8 were not very different, if at all, from that of the control.

(50) Tables 7, 8, and 9 contain cold flow shelf life data for runs in Table 1 that were held at 45 C./33% RH for 8 days.

(51) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Results: Cold Flow Test - 30 C./70% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Weight Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 24.1 25.3 23.3 22.6 6.4 11.0 19.7 Day 6 25.4 25.7 24.7 25.3 7.1 12.9 21.8 Day 8 25.9 25.3 24.2 26.1 7.4 14.0 22.4

(52) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Results: Cold Flow Test - 30 C./70% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Width Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 57.6 71.4 68.7 70.0 14.0 24.4 19.2 Day 6 109.3 72.6 81.4 77.0 9.0 26.0 17.5 Day 8 169.0 77.2 83.4 80.3 8.0 36.6 22.3

(53) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Results: Cold Flow Test - 30 C./70% RH Run # 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Height Control: Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Sucrose/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Isomalt/Linear Change Sucrose/Corn Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin (%) Syrup (80/20) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) (80/20) (60/40) (40/60) Day 3 47.4 55.3 58.5 55.7 3.8 18.2 43.6 Day 6 66.8 58.2 61.1 75.3 22.4 22.9 55.2 Day 8 74.3 68.1 62.6 79.9 23.3 28.1 61.4 Negative number is due to height decreasing over storage time.

(54) Tables 7, 8, and 9 contain data from runs in Table 1 stored at 30 C./70% RH and then weighed and measured (width and height) on day 3, 6, and 8. The data in Tables 7, 8, and 9 show that that the weight change for runs 2 4 was similar to that of the control, but the weight change of runs 6-8 was much less than the control. The width change for runs 2-8 was much less than the width change of the control, with the width change of runs 6-8 the least. The height change for runs 2-4 was similar to that of the control. Of the isomalt runs, run 8 was similar to the control, but runs 6 and 7 had less height change. Overall, runs 2-8 were very different from the control, as they were much more stable to cold flow than the control.

(55) Hard candy made with sucrose and corn syrup (at 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio) is already somewhat unstable during storage, especially in humid conditions. Both sucrose and corn syrup are hygroscopic. Stored sucrose based hard candy can absorb water from the atmosphere during storage, and if the doctoring agent cannot control that water, then the hard candy cold flows. Inulin is hygroscopic like corn syrup solids, and as such can absorb and trap some of the water absorbed by the hard candy. The data show that inulin was better at preventing cold flow in a sucrose based hard candy than corn syrup solids. The results also showed that bulking sweetener agents, such as isomalt, exist that can make hard candy, which is more stable to cold flow than sucrose. Thus, the goal is to reduce sugar content in hard candy while not increasing the tendency to cold flow during storage by choosing bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents and their effective ratio.

(56) Not all bulking sweetener agent and doctoring agent combinations will make a hard candy piece when cooked and cooled. For example, a hard candy formula with about 90/10 wt % trehalose to linear inulin will not harden, unless other bulking sweetener agents or doctoring agents are added. But, 50:50 dry solids wt. % trehalose to linear inulin will harden and consumers found it similar to the 80:20 sucrose to corn syrup control in several characteristics. Tables 10-16 give formulas for containing various combinations bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents. All of these formulas made hard candy runs. Most of the runs were tested in consumer sensory tests against sucrose and corn syrup controls at 80:20 dry solids wt. % ratio.

(57) Table 10 gives formulas for hard candy with sucrose and different doctoring agents.

(58) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Formulas with Sugars and Different Doctoring Agents Run # 10 13 Sucrose/ 11 12 Sucrose/ 14 Corn Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Trehalose/ Trehalose/ Syrup Linear Branched Branched Linear Ingredients Control Inulin Inulin Inulin Inulin Sucrose 81.80 66.88 66.89 33.45 0.00 Trehalose 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.45 49.06 Corn Syrup 16.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Linear Inulin 0.00 31.26 0.00 0.00 49.06 Branched 0.00 0.00 31.25 31.23 0.00 Inulin HIS 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.11 Flavor 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Citric Acid 1.63 1.77 1.77 1.77 1.77

(59) The hard candy products in Table 10 were produced by mixing, cooking until 257 F. (147 C.), and then forming semi-cooled mass into individual hard candy pieces using a drop roller.

(60) Table 11 contains the consumer sensory test results for runs in Table 10 for hard candy with various bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents.

(61) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Consumer Sensory Results: Sugars and various doctoring agents Run 10 Sucrose/ Run11 Run 12 Run 13 Corn Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Sucrose/ Run 14 Syrup Linear Branched Trehalose/ Trehalose/ Control Inulin Inulin Branched Linear (A) (B) (C) Inulin (D) Inulin (E) 30 seconds Flavor 6.51 7.70 AE 7.60 AE 7.64 AE 6.73 Liking Flavor 2.14 3.02 AE 2.94 AE AE 2.70 A Strength 3 minutes Overall 6.22 7.48 AE 7.32 AE 7.51 AE 6.01 Liking Flavor 5.81 7.53 AE 7.40 AE 7.59 AE 5.99 Liking Flavor 2.02 3.06 ACE 2.84 AE 3.05 ACE 2.74 A Strength Texture 7.22 E 7.40 E 7.20 E 7.28 E 6.80 Liking n = 81 Significance is at 95% c.i. one-tailed test

(62) The hard candy runs in Table 11 were evaluated in sensory testing with consumers (n=81) in a blind and random order. Participants tasted all found runs. Runs were evaluated on a 1-9 scale (9 being the highest) for liking scores, and on a 1-5 scale (5 being the highest) for strength scores. After 30 seconds, participants were to evaluate the runs for flavor liking and flavor strength. After 3 minutes, participants were to evaluate runs for overall liking, flavor liking, flavor strength, and texture liking. Letters after the test data number are for indicating a statistically significant difference at a 95% confidence (one-tail test) from a different run.

(63) The consumer sensory results in Table 11 show that runs 11, 12 and 13 had significantly higher scores from the control and run 10 for flavor liking, flavor strength, and overall flavor. Runs 11, 12 and 13 had similar texture liking scores to that of the control. Run 14 was similar to the control for all results, except flavor strength, where run 14 had significantly higher scores.

(64) Table 12 gives formulas for hard candy with different bulking sweetener agents and different doctoring agents.

(65) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Hard Candy with Isomaltulose: Formulas Run # 15 16 18 19 20 Sucrose/Corn Isomaltulose/ 17 Isomaltulose/ Isomaltulose/ Isomaltulose/ 21 Syrup Brown Isomaltulose/ Branched Linear Sucromalt/ Erythritol/ Ingredients Control Rice Syrup Sucromalt Inulin Inulin Erythritol Sucromalt Sucrose 81.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Isomaltulose 0.00 64.33 64.88 66.91 67.05 32.65 0.00 Erythritol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.62 67.36 Corn Syrup 16.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Brown Rice 0.00 33.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Syrup Branched 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Inulin Linear 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.44 0.00 0.00 Inulin Sucromalt 0.00 0.00 33.31 0.00 0.00 33.53 31.44 HIS 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Flavor 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Citric Acid 1.63 1.70 1.72 1.78 1.42 1.12 1.12

(66) The hard candy products in Table 12 were produced by mixing, cooking until 257 F. (147 C.), and then forming semi-cooled mass into individual hard candy pieces using a drop roller.

(67) Table 13 contains the consumer sensory test results for runs 15, 16, 17 and 18 in Table 12 for hard candy with isomaltulose and various doctoring agents.

(68) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Consumer Sensory Results: Isomaltulose with various doctoring agents Run # 15 16 17 18 Sucrose/Corn Isomaltulose/ Isomaltulose/ Isomaltulose/ Syrup Control Brown Rice Sucromalt Branched (A) Syrup (B) (C) Inulin (D) 30 seconds Flavor 7.46 B 6.87 7.45 B 7.12 Liking Flavor 2.84 d 2.78 2.95 D 2.60 Strength 3 minutes Overall 7.49 BD 6.72 7.22 B 7.02 Liking Flavor 7.33 B 6.42 7.19 B 7.01 B Liking Flavor 3.05 Bd 2.65 3.12 BD 2.82 Strength Texture 7.32 D 7.08 7.31 d 6.95 Liking n = 85 Significance is at 95% c.i. one-tailed test

(69) The hard candy runs in Table 13 were evaluated in sensory testing with consumers (n=85) in a blind and random order. Participants tasted all four runs. Runs were evaluated on a 1-9 scale (9 being the highest) for liking scores, and on a 1-5 scale (5 being the highest) for strength scores. After 30 seconds, participants were to evaluate the runs for flavor liking and flavor strength. After 3 minutes, participants were to evaluate runs for overall liking, flavor liking, flavor strength, and texture liking. Letters after the test data number are for indicating a statistically significant difference at a 95% confidence (one-tail test) from a different run.

(70) The consumer sensory results in Table 13 show that run 16 has scores significantly less than that of the control and run 17 for most of the characteristics tested. The results of this test group show that different doctoring agents can create product differences, even when all have the same bulking sweetener agent.

(71) Table 14 contains descriptions of hard candy formed for runs 15-23 in Table 12.

(72) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Description of Formed Hard Candy Description of Run Formed Hard Candy 15 Sucrose/Corn Syrup Control Nice hard candy, good texture, not sticky. 16 Isomaltulose/Brown Rice Syrup Nice hard candy, good texture, not sticky. 17 Isomaltulose/Sucromalt Nice hard candy, good texture, not sticky, clean sweetness. 18 Isomaltulose/Branched Inulin Nice hard candy, good texture, not sticky, flavor note from branched inulin. 19 Isomaltulose/Linear Inulin Nice hard candy in the beginning, but became sticky later on. 20 Isomaltulose/Sucromalt/Erythritol Wouldn't harden. No candy formed. 21 Erythritol/Sucromalt The deposited candy set, formed hard candy, not sticky.

(73) The run descriptions in Table 14 are of hard candy made with various bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents.

(74) Table 15 gives formulas for hard candy with different bulking sweetener agents and different doctoring agents.

(75) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Formulas for runs with various bulking and doctoring agents. Runs # 22 24 25 Sucrose/ 23 Trehalose/ Trehalose/ Corn Syrup Isomaltulose/ Erythritol/Linear Erythritol/ Control (A) Indigestible Inulin/Brown Linear Ingredients (2) Dextrin (B) Rice Syrup (C) Inulin (D) Sucrose 81.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trehalose 0.00 0.00 31.45 31.32 Isomaltulose 0.00 66.87 0.00 0.00 Erythritol 0.00 0.00 10.48 10.45 Corn Syrup 16.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 Indigestible 0.00 31.22 0.00 0.00 Dextrin Brown Rice 0.00 0.00 24.82 0.00 Syrup Linear Inulin 0.00 0.00 31.45 56.44 HIS 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.12 Flavor 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Citric Acid 1.63 1.77 1.67 1.66

(76) The hard candy products in Table 15 were produced by mixing, cooking until 257 F. (147 C.), and then forming semi-cooled mass into individual hard candy pieces using a drop roller.

(77) Table 16 contains the consumer sensory test results for runs 22, 23, 24 and 25 in Table 15 for hard candy with various bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents.

(78) TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Consumer Sensory Results: Runs with various bulking and doctoring agents Run # 24 Trehalose/ 25 22 23 Erythritol/ Trehalose/ Sucrose/Corn Isomaltulose/ Linear Erythritol/ Syrup Indigestible Inulin/Brown Linear Control (A) Dextrin (B) Rice Syrup (C) Inulin (D) 30 seconds Flavor 6.75 7.32 A 7.49 A 7.25 A Liking Flavor 2.38 2.83 A 2.79 A 2.96 A Strength 3 minutes Overall 6.55 7.23 A 7.29 A 6.97 A Liking Flavor 6.39 6.95 A 7.05 A 6.84 Liking Flavor 2.31 2.87 A 2.75 A 2.79 A Strength Texture 7.09 7.43 A 7.60 A 7.38 Liking n = 77 Significance is at 95% c.i. one-tailed test

(79) The hard candy runs in Table 14 were evaluated in sensory testing with consumers (n=77) in a blind and random order. Participants tasted all four runs. Runs were evaluated on a 1-9 scale (9 being the highest) for liking scores, and on a 1-5 scale (5 being the highest) for strength scores. After 30 seconds, participants were to evaluate the runs for flavor liking and flavor strength. After 3 minutes, participants were to evaluate runs for overall liking, flavor liking, flavor strength, and texture liking. Letters after the test data number are for indicating a statistically significant difference at a 95% confidence (one-tail test) from a different run.

(80) The consumer sensory results in Table 14 show that the hard candy runs 23-25 had significantly higher sensory test results than the control for most of the attributes tested. Trehalose appears to make more acceptable hard candy when combined with other bulk sweetening agents then when on it's own.

(81) The results of the sensory testing show that combinations of bulking sweetener agents and doctoring agents in the ratios of 80/20 to 20/80 wt % (preferably 70/30 to 30/70) can be used to make hard candy at least as stable to sucrose/corn syrup hard candy and with at least sensory qualities similar to sucrose/corn syrup hard candy.

(82) The compositions and methods of the present invention are capable of being incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which have been illustrated and described above. The invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all aspects only as illustrative and not restrictive, and the scope of the invention, therefore, is indicated by the claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.