Accommodating intraocular lenses
10390937 ยท 2019-08-27
Assignee
Inventors
- Terah Whiting Smiley (San Francisco, CA, US)
- David John Smith (Highland, CA, US)
- Steven Choi (Mountain View, CA, US)
- Henry Wu (Belmont, CA, US)
- JOHN A. SCHOLL (SAN RAMON, CA, US)
- Denise Horrilleno Burns (Sunnyvale, CA, US)
Cpc classification
A61F2/1601
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2/1613
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2002/1682
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2/1624
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
Accommodating intraocular lenses containing a flowable media and their methods of accommodation.
Claims
1. An accommodating intraocular lens, comprising: an optic that includes a deformable anterior element that includes an anterior most location of the optic, the deformable anterior element adapted to deform to change the power of the accommodating intraocular lens, a posterior element that includes a posterior most location of the optic, and an optic fluid chamber; a first haptic that is secured to the optic and that extends radially outward from the optic, the first haptic having an anterior portion that extends further in the anterior direction than the anterior most location of the optic; and a second haptic that is secured to the optic and that extends radially outward from the optic, the second haptic having a posterior portion that extends further in the posterior direction than the posterior most location of the optic, the first and second haptic each comprising a material and a configuration such that they are adapted to deform in response to capsular bag reshaping.
2. The accommodating intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the first and second haptics each have a fluid chamber in fluid communication with the optic fluid chamber.
3. The accommodating intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the first haptic also extends further in the posterior direction than the posterior most location of the optic.
4. The accommodating intraocular lens of claim 1, wherein the second haptic also extends further in the anterior direction than the anterior most location of the optic.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(14) The invention relates generally to intraocular lenses (IOLs) and particularly to accommodating intraocular lenses. In preferred embodiments the IOL includes a flowable media (such as a fluid, gelatinous material, etc.) that is moved within the IOL, in response to ciliary muscle movement, to change the power of the IOL.
(15)
(16) Isolated from the eye, the relaxed capsule and lens take on a convex shape. However, when suspended within the eye by zonules 4, capsule 5 moves between a moderately convex shape (when the ciliary muscles are relaxed) and a highly convex shape (when the ciliary muscles are contracted). As shown in
(17) Additionally, various natural mechanisms affect the design requirements of the present invention. For example, during accommodation the pupil naturally stops down (i.e., reduces in diameter) which reduces the area of the natural lens that transmits light. In addition, the eye will experience the Stiles-Crawford Effect which also reduces the effective area of the natural lens. In particular, the brightness of light rays incident on cones in the eye is dependent on the angle at which those rays are incident on the cones. In particular, light rays that strike the cones perpendicular to their surface appear brighter than those that do not. As a result, the light rays passing through the periphery of the lens are less significant for proper vision.
(18)
(19) Deformation of haptics 12 and 14 in response to contraction of ciliary muscles movement transfers the flowable media (such as a fluid) between interior volume 24 and active channel 26. When the flowable media is transferred into the active channel from the haptics, the pressure in the active channel increases, causing actuator 20 to deflect in the anterior direction. This causes anterior element 16 to deflect in the anterior direction, increasing the IOL power in this accommodated configuration.
(20) In any of the embodiments herein, moving fluid between the haptics and the optic portion can cause the change in curvature of the posterior element rather than, or in addition to, the anterior element. While changing the curvature of the anterior element is described herein, this is not meant to be limiting to the IOLs. For example, the IOL can be flipped upon implantation such that the anterior element is disposed on the posterior side of the lens, while the posterior element is disposed on the anterior side of the lens. Moving fluid from the haptics to the optics would therefore cause the posterior surface of the IOL deflect. Alternatively, the actuator can be in contact with the posterior element and the active channel can be defined by the intermediate layer and the anterior element, while the passive chamber is defined by the posterior element and the intermediate layer. Moving fluid from the haptics to the active channel would thereby deflect the posterior element.
(21)
(22) All of the components of the optic portion, including the active flowable media and the passive flowable media, can be substantially index-matched to provide for a generally singular lens element defined by the anterior surface of the anterior element and the posterior surface of the posterior element. Substantially index-matched as used herein refers to an IOL whose components are intended to have the same index of refraction, but whose actual indices may differ slightly. The term also refers to a lens which can have adhesive (to bond different components of the lens together) which may have an index of refraction that is slightly different than the indices of the other IOL components.
(23) Some of the components may, however, have different indices of refraction, creating additional interfaces within the IOL.
(24)
(25) Bellows thickness 34 can be adjusted to change the responsiveness of the actuator. As the thickness of the bellows decreases, less fluid pressure is generally required to displace the actuator. In some embodiments the bellows thickness is between about 0.05 mm and about 0.3 mm.
(26) Decreasing the anterior element thickness 31 generally increases the responsiveness of the actuator for a given fluid pressure. Length of bellows 40 can also be adjusted to alter the responsiveness of the actuator (actuator diameter 35 can similarly be adjusted). As the length of the bellows increases, the volume of the active channel is increased and more volume of flowable media is required to move the actuator. However, by increasing the bellows length, the pressure in the active channel is decreased. Therefore, the volume and pressure required to drive the actuator can be optimized in combination with the flowable media transferred from the haptics to provide the greatest response.
(27) In some embodiments the length of the bellows is between about 1 mm and 2 mm. In some embodiments actuator diameter 35 is between about 2.8 mm and about 4.2 mm.
(28) The dimensions given above are merely exemplary and not intended to be limiting.
(29)
(30) The amount of shape change (i.e., the change in curvature) that the anterior element will undergo in response to fluid movement between the peripheral portion and the optic portion will depend partially on how and where the anterior element is bonded to either the intermediate layer or the posterior element. By varying these boundary conditions it is possible to change the optic power shift for a given amount of displacement at the center of the lens. For example, an anterior element bonded at the very edge of its periphery will deflect in a more spherical manner than will an anterior element that is bonded more radially inward than merely at its periphery. The former is allowed to flex all the way out to its periphery, while the latter is more constrained when deflected and will assume a less spherical configuration when in an accommodated configuration (i.e., will have a stronger aberration).
(31) In addition, the lens bonded at its periphery will deflect at lower active channel pressures than will a lens that is bonded closer to the center.
(32) The anterior element is attached to the posterior element at surface 417 of the posterior element. This mating surface is substantially orthogonal to the optical axis OA. This helps with the assembly process, and gives anterior element 404 a firm foundation on which to sit.
(33) The posterior element in
(34)
(35)
(36) As the pressure in active channel 308 increases (due to movement of the capsular bag), deflection element 312 moves in the anterior direction. Because of the pressure transfer into passive chamber 314, anterior element 302 also moves in the anterior direction (thus increasing the power of the lens) but remains generally spherical. The deflection element deflects more quickly than the anterior element, until they engage, as shown in
(37) As the pressure in the active channel continues to increase, the actuator continues to deflect in the anterior direction. Because the deflection element is in contact with the anterior element, further deflection element movement deflects the anterior element. Because of the size of the deflection element relative to the anterior element, the fluid in passive chamber 314 redistributes and creates an aspheric effect in anterior element 302, as shown in
(38) This embodiment allows for a lower power change rate at relatively low stimulus levels (
(39) One or more of the optic components can be made from suitable polymeric materials. In one embodiment all of the optic components are made of substantially the same polymeric material. Exemplary polymeric compositions that can be used for the optic portion include those described in commonly owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/034,942, filed Feb. 21, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/177,720, filed Jul. 22, 2008.
(40) The haptics are disposed on the lens such that when implanted in the lens capsule, the haptics deform in response to the capsule shape changes. The capsule changes shape as the zonules apply or relax forces on the capsule in response to ciliary muscle relaxation or contraction.
(41) In one embodiment the IOL is a fluid-driven accommodating IOL which is adapted to move fluid between an interior chamber in the haptics and the optic portion in response to ciliary muscle movement to cause a change in the power of the lens. In a particular embodiment the fluid is moved to the optic portion as the ciliary muscles begin to contract, causing the zonules to relax the forces applied to the capsule. As the zonules relax the forces, the capsule and/or the optic portion compress the haptic, resulting in fluid moving to the optic portion and an increase in fluid pressure in the optic portion. The fluid movement causes a deflection in an anterior element of the lens, which increases the power of the lens.
(42)
(43)
(44) Other shapes and/or cross sections can also be used to provide for a more responsive haptic. In addition, the haptic may be comprised of a plurality of sections each with differing polymeric compositions, which may allow one section of the haptic to be stiffer than a different section, which could help increase the responsiveness of the haptic. Exemplary polymeric compositions that can be used for the haptics include those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/034,942, filed Feb. 21, 2008, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/177,720, filed Jul. 22, 2008.
(45) Wall thicknesses can also be varied in a given cross-section to allow localized movement and to increase efficiency.
(46) In some embodiments the haptic shape may be adapted to more naturally mate with the curved equatorial portion of the lens capsule in an disaccommodated state, or to better compliment the corresponding mating surface of the lens. This may help increase the responsiveness of the haptic and decrease the amount of lost movement due to dead space between the haptic and the capsule.
(47)
(48)
(49) Additional exemplary accommodating IOLs that can incorporate any of the features described herein are described in commonly owned U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/433,046, filed Dec. 12, 2002; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,122,053; 7,261,737; 7,247,168; and 7,217,288; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/642,388, filed Dec. 19, 2006; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/646,913, filed Dec. 27, 2006, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
(50) While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.