Determining measure of gaping in fish fillet item

11992020 ยท 2024-05-28

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item, involves the steps of obtaining three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item, obtaining optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area; and determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area and the optical imaging data within the overlap area.

Claims

1. A method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item, the method comprising the steps of: obtaining three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; obtaining optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area; determining a measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the (i) three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the (ii) optical imaging data within the overlap area.

2. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the step of: determining a candidate gaping area set based on the (i) three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; and/or the (ii) optical imaging data of the fish fillet item; and wherein determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item is based on the candidate gaping area set.

3. A method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item, the method comprising the steps of: obtaining optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area; determining a measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the (i) three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the (ii) optical imaging data within the overlap area; obtaining three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; wherein determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item comprises determining a candidate gaping area set of the fish fillet item, in which each candidate gaping area passes each of: a test where pass or failure is based on the three-dimensional profile data, based exclusively on the three-dimensional profile data, of the fish fillet item; and a test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data, based exclusively on the optical imaging data, of the fish fillet item.

4. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 3, wherein the test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item comprises comparing an actual value of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in a position in or adjacent to the candidate gaping area with one or more expected values of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in the position in or adjacent to the candidate gaping area.

5. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 3, wherein the test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item comprises comparing an actual value of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in a position adjacent to the candidate gaping area, with one or more expected values of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in the position adjacent to the candidate gaping area.

6. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 3, wherein the test where pass or failure is based on the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item comprises comparing an actual value of the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item in a position adjacent to the candidate gaping area, with one or more expected values of the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item in the position adjacent to the candidate gaping area.

7. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 3, wherein determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item is based on the candidate gaping area set.

8. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, arranged for allowing, at least under certain circumstances, depending on the optical imaging data, that an area of the fish fillet item contributes to the measure of gaping even if it is not considered a gaping area based on the three-dimensional profile data.

9. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, arranged for allowing, at least under certain circumstances, depending on the optical imaging data, that an area of the fish fillet item does not contribute to the measure of gaping even if it is considered a gaping area based on the three-dimensional profile data.

10. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, arranged for allowing, at least under certain circumstances, depending on the three-dimensional profile data, that an area of the fish fillet item contributes to the measure of gaping even it is not considered a gaping area based on the optical imaging data.

11. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, arranged for allowing, at least under certain circumstances, depending on the three-dimensional profile data, that an area of the fish fillet item does not contribute to the measure of gaping even it is considered a gaping area based on the optical imaging data.

12. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the measure of gaping is representative of an amount or degree of gaping, and/or wherein the measure of gaping is qualified or quantified on a one-dimensional scale, exclusively on a one-dimensional scale.

13. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item comprises simultaneously employing the (i) three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the (ii) optical imaging data within the overlap area.

14. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises obtaining: the three-dimensional profile data; and/or the optical imaging data; while at least a part of the fish fillet item is placed on a non-planar surface.

15. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 14, wherein the non-planar surface, a conveyor, upon which the fish fillet item, comprises a protrusion having a point being at least 0.5 cm, away from a straight line connecting points on the surface on either side of the protrusion and being within 1 cm to 100 cm from each other.

16. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 14, wherein the fish fillet item is placed on a protrusion, which protrusion is elongated, having an aspect ratio being higher than 1, and wherein a smallest angle between a longitudinal axis of the protrusion and an axis of the fish fillet item parallel with a centreline and/or a backbone of the fish had it been present is equal to or smaller than 60?.

17. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the method is an automated and/or inline method.

18. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein said fish fillet item originates from a fish within the order of salmoniformes, is an item of any one of trout and salmon.

19. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein determining the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item comprises determining a candidate gaping area set of the fish fillet item, wherein: in a step A, determining a candidate gaping area set of the fish fillet item based on at least the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; in a step B, (i) subjecting each candidate gaping area to a test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item; and (ii) removing from the set any candidate gaping area failing the test.

20. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: determining one or more positions of one or more candidate gaping areas of the fish fillet item on the basis of at least the (i) three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; and the (ii) optical imaging data of the fish fillet item.

21. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 20, wherein the method further comprises determining a distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts over the fish fillet item dividing the fish fillet item into fish fillet item portions on the basis of at least the determined one or more positions of the one or more candidate gaping areas and at least one fish portion feature.

22. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 21, wherein the method further comprises cutting the fish fillet item into fish fillet item portions according to the determined distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts.

23. The method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises providing a parameter based on the measure of gaping to an upstream station and/or to a downstream station, including adjusting processing at an upstream station and/or at a downstream station based on said parameter.

24. A fish fillet item processing apparatus for determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item comprising: a three-dimensional profile determining device, including a camera and a line laser, for generating three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; an optical imaging device, including a camera, for generating optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the second area is at least partially overlapping with the first area; and a processing unit, including a computer, operatively coupled to the three-dimensional profile determining device and the optical imaging device.

25. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a computer program, comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out a method comprising the steps of: obtaining three-dimensional profile data of a first area of a fish fillet item; obtaining optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area; determining a measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the (i) three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the (ii) optical imaging data within the overlap area, and/or comprising instructions to cause a fish fillet item processing apparatus for determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item comprising: a three-dimensional profile determining device, including a camera and a line laser, for generating three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; an optical imaging device, including a camera, for generating optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the second area is at least partially overlapping with the first area; and a processing unit, including a computer, operatively coupled to the three-dimensional profile determining device and the optical imaging device; wherein said apparatus is arranged to execute the steps of said method.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

(1) The method, apparatus, computer program product and use of an apparatus or computer program product for determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item according to the invention will now be described in more detail with regard to the accompanying figures. The figures show one way of implementing the present invention and is not to be construed as being limiting to other possible embodiments falling within the scope of the attached claim set.

(2) FIG. 1 shows a flow-chart illustrating a method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item,

(3) FIG. 2 shows a fish fillet item associated with a candidate gaping area set,

(4) FIG. 3 shows a flow-chart of a method of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item,

(5) FIG. 4 shows a flow-chart of a method,

(6) FIG. 5 shows a candidate gaping area set based on the optical imaging data,

(7) FIG. 6 shows a candidate gaping area set based on the three-dimensional profile data,

(8) FIG. 7 illustrates the result of a method comprising determining a distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts,

(9) FIG. 8 shows a fish fillet item processing apparatus,

(10) FIG. 9-10 shows a method wherein during obtaining the three-dimensional profile data; and/or the optical imaging data at least a part of the fish fillet item is placed on a non-planar surface,

(11) FIGS. 11-13 show examples of fish fillets with gaping which could be according to categories 2-4,

(12) FIGS. 14-17 show 3D profile data and optical imaging data for a first fish fillet example,

(13) FIGS. 18-21 show 3D profile data and optical imaging data for a second fillet example,

(14) FIGS. 22-25 show 3D profile data and optical imaging data for a third fish fillet example.

DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

(15) FIG. 1 shows a flow-chart illustrating a method 100 of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item, which in FIG. 1 is a salmo salar (Atlantic salmon) species, the method comprising the steps of: Obtaining 102 three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; Obtaining 104 optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area; determining 106 the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the i. three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the ii. optical imaging data within the overlap area.

(16) The method 100 shown in FIG. 1 furthermore comprises providing 105 a parameter based on the measure of gaping to an upstream station 110, such as a thawing or de-freezing station, so that operation can be assessed, such as adjusted and/or improved, in case the measure of gaping could or should be improved. The figure also shows a step of measuring 112 three-dimensional profile data and optical imaging data, and in this embodiment the steps of obtaining 102 three-dimensional profile data and obtaining 104 optical imaging data is realized by receiving previously measured three-dimensional profile data and/or optical imaging data.

(17) In the specific embodiment depicted in FIG. 1, the method further comprises (such as for example within the step of determining 106 the measure of gaping) determining one or more positions of one or more candidate gaping areas of the fish fillet item on the basis of at least the colour imaging data of the fish fillet item; and the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item. The figure also shows determining 108 a distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts over the fish fillet item dividing the fish fillet item into fish fillet item portions on the basis of at least the determined one or more positions of the one or more candidate gaping areas and at least one fish portion feature.

(18) The step of obtaining 102, 104 the two types of data, determining 106 the measure of gaping and determining 108 a distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts might be carried out on the same processing unit, such as in the same algorithm.

(19) FIG. 1 furthermore shows sending the distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts to a downstream (cutting) station, where it can be used for cutting 109.

(20) FIG. 2 shows a fish fillet item 3 associated with a candidate gaping area set, which in the figure comprises three candidate areas 20 of gaping. The specific candidate area set in FIG. 2 is representative of actual (true) gaping areas of the specific fish fillet item 3.

(21) FIG. 3 shows a flow-chart of a method 300 of determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item, wherein the method comprises the steps of obtaining 102 three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; obtaining 104 optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area;
and additionally comprises the step of: determining a candidate gaping area set based on the i. three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; and/or the ii. optical imaging data of the fish fillet item;
and wherein determining 306 the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item is based on the candidate gaping area set, and more particularly in the specific method of FIG. 3 this comprises determining a candidate gaping area set of the fish fillet item, wherein: in a step A, determining 314 a candidate gaping area set, such as an initial candidate gaping area set, of the fish fillet item based on at least the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; in a step B, i. subjecting each candidate gaping area to a test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item; and ii. removing 316 from the set any candidate gaping area failing the test, such as thereby providing a revised candidate gaping area set, and determining 306 the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on the (revised) candidate gaping area set with areas removed.

(22) FIG. 4 shows a flow-chart of a method 400 comprising the steps of obtaining 102 three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; obtaining 104 optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the first area and the second area are overlapping at least within an overlap area;
and wherein the method comprises simultaneously employing the i. three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area, and the ii. optical imaging data within the overlap area.

(23) The figure furthermore shows pre-processing being carried out 418 on the three-dimensional profile data within the overlap area and carried out 420 on the optical imaging data within the overlap area. Simultaneously employing the two data types may be realized by providing 422 a derived version of either of the three-dimensional profile data or the optical imaging data where the other data type has been employed to refine details, such as wherein the derived version of data may comprise data in a non-binary format and/or a format of an interval or ratio type. The method can then comprise determining 406 the measure of gaping in the fish fillet item based on derived version of the data, i.e., simultaneously based on both data types.

(24) In an alternative embodiment, there is provided a function, such as G(input)=(measure of gaping), which takes an input and directly converts it to a measure of gaping, wherein the input may be a set of data (such as a vector), comprising spatial coordinates (x, y, z) and/or image data, such as monochrome intensity (I) or colour values (e.g., R, G, B). Directly may be understood that no intermediate steps, such as generation of initial candidate gaping area set, are created.

(25) FIG. 5-6 illustrates results from independently generating candidate gaping area sets from either of the three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item (FIG. 5) and/or the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item (FIG. 6), wherein the fish fillet item 3 is the same as depicted in FIG. 2 (where FIG. 2 comprises a true candidate gaping area set).

(26) FIG. 5 shows that the candidate gaping area set based on the optical imaging data correctly comprises gaping areas 22A. However, a true gaping area is missing as indicated by the area 26 encircled by a dashed ellipse. Furthermore, a false positive gaping area 22B is also included. Furthermore, the figure shows a piece of crescent moon shaped blue (plastic) area 24.

(27) FIG. 6 shows that the candidate gaping area set based on the three-dimensional profile data correctly comprises gaping areas 28A. However, a true gaping area is missing as indicated by the area 30 encircled by a dashed ellipse. Furthermore, a false positive gaping area 28B is also included. Furthermore, the figure shows a cavity 32 adjacent to a centre line indicated with the thick, dashed line.

(28) FIGS. 5-6 show that neither data modality yields a correct candidate gaping area set since each modality comprises both a false negative and a false positive candidate gaping area. However, by utilizing both data types an improved, or even true, candidate gaping area set can be achieved. For example, an initial candidate gaping area set can be provided by including all candidate gaping areas of each modality, and then optionally removing some of the candidate gaping areas in one or both modalities based on information from the other modality. For example, the candidate gaping area 22B in FIG. 5 can be removed because it is too close to the centre line as observed in FIG. 6 and oriented with major axis parallel to the centre line and hence very likely a false positive in FIG. 6. Similarly, the candidate gaping area 28B in FIG. 6 can be removed because it is too close to crescent moon shaped blue (plastic) area 24 and hence very likely a false positive in FIG. 6. The candidate gaping areas in area 26 in FIG. 5 and area 30 in FIG. 6 are included because there might be no reason for removing them and they are hence considered false negative in the modalities where they are not included in the candidate gaping area set. Hence, the result might be that even though each modality is wrong in several ways (false positives and false negatives), by combining the modalities an improved measure of gaping can be achieved, optionally via an improved candidate gaping area set.

(29) The candidate gaping area 28B in FIG. 6 may be considered a false positive because due to failing a test, wherein the test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data (cf., FIG. 5) of the fish fillet item comprises comparing: an actual value (such as blue) of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in a position in or adjacent to the candidate gaping area,
with one or more expected values (such as salmon coloured) of the optical imaging data of the fish fillet item in the position in or adjacent to the candidate gaping area
wherein the comparison might for example comprise checking if a colour channel, such as the blue B channel in a set of red-green-blue (RGB) channels, exceeds a threshold value.

(30) In another approach a revised candidate gaping area set of the fish fillet item may be provided wherein only candidate gaping areas identified in both modalities are included, such as wherein each candidate gaping area in the revised candidate gaping area set passes each of: a test where pass or failure is based on the three-dimensional profile data, such as based exclusively on the three-dimensional profile data, of the fish fillet item; and a test where pass or failure is based on the optical imaging data, such as based exclusively on the optical imaging data, of the fish fillet item.

(31) FIG. 7 illustrates the result of a method comprising: determining one or more positions of one or more candidate gaping areas of the fish fillet item on the basis of at least the i. three-dimensional profile data of the fish fillet item; and ii. optical imaging data, such as wherein the optical imaging data being colour imaging data of the fish fillet item; determining a distribution 36 of fish fillet item portion cuts over the fish fillet item dividing the fish fillet item into fish fillet item portions on the basis of at least the determined one or more positions of the one or more candidate gaping areas and at least one fish portion feature, such as portion weight or minimum portion weight.

(32) By cutting the fish item along dash-dotted line 36 the result is three pieces 34A-C without gaping areas, and only one piece 34D with gaping areas. Thus, the three pieces 34A-C have high value and are applicable for a wide range of purposes, even if the original fish fillet item had a low value due to gaping and little or no applicability. A less intelligent cutting could have resulted in, e.g., a single cut through the gaping areas, which would result in both the resulting cut portions having gaping areas.

(33) FIG. 8 shows a fish fillet item processing apparatus 800 for determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item comprising: a three-dimensional profile determining device 840, such as a camera and a line laser, for generating three-dimensional profile data of a first area of the fish fillet item; an optical imaging device 842, such as a camera (which could in other embodiments be the same camera as the camera in a three-dimensional profile determining device 840, for generating optical imaging data of a second area of the fish fillet item, wherein the second area is at least partially overlapping with the first area; a processing unit 844, such as a computer, operatively coupled to the three-dimensional profile determining device and the optical imaging device and arranged for carrying out the method according to the first aspect.

(34) The fish fillet item processing apparatus in FIG. 8 furthermore comprises a conveyor 850 for conveying a fish item 803 from left to right as indicated by the non-filled arrows, a cutting apparatus 846 receiving a cutting distribution from the processing unit 844 as indicated by the arrow between processing unit 844 and cutting apparatus 846. The fish fillet item processing apparatus in FIG. 8 furthermore comprises a sorting unit 848 receiving information from the processing unit 844 (not shown).

(35) The processing unit may be operatively connected to a storage device comprising a computer program, such as a computer program product, comprising instructions which, when the program is executed by a computer, cause the computer to carry out the method of according to the first aspect.

(36) The fish item processing apparatus may be arranged for carrying out an automated and inline method for determining a measure of gaping in a fish fillet item (and for cutting, such as cutting the fish fillet item into fish fillet item portions according to a determined distribution of fish fillet item portion cuts, and for sorting).

(37) FIG. 9-10 shows a method wherein during obtaining The three-dimensional profile data; and/or The optical imaging data;
at least a part of the fish fillet item is placed on a non-planar surface (952).

(38) FIG. 9 shows a top view of a fish fillet item 3 during said obtaining (one or both types of data) where the plane of the paper is horizontal, and the viewing direction is vertical. The figure also indicates a non-planar surface 952 upon which the fish fillet item is placed. The fish fillet item is in the figure placed on a conveyor belt with conveying direction from left to right, as indicated by the non-filled arrow, which is parallel with a spine direction of the fish fillet item. Section 954 is depicted in FIG. 10.

(39) FIG. 10 shows the cross-sectional view 954 (as indicated in FIG. 9) of a fish fillet item 3 during said obtaining (one or both types of data) where the plane of the paper is horizontally aligned. The figure also indicates a non-planar surface 952, such as the surface of an elongated convex feature placed on an otherwise flat conveyor belt 950, upon which the fish fillet item is placed.

(40) The non-planar surface comprises an elongated convex feature arranged so that at least a portion of the fish fillet item is bent around an axis being substantially parallel with a direction of a spine (if the spine would still have been present), which direction in FIG. 9 is left-right horizontal and in FIG. 10 is orthogonal to the plane of the paper, during measuring the three-dimensional profile data and/or the optical imaging data. The fish fillet item is conveyed in a direction (cf., the non-filled arrow in FIG. 9) substantially parallel with a direction of a spine and an elongated and oriented in a direction substantially parallel with the conveying direction convex feature of the conveyor is placed so as to substantially coincide with a fat centreline (cf., e.g., the thick dashed line in FIG. 6 which is left out for clarity in FIGS. 9-10) of the fish fillet item during obtaining, such as measuring, the three-dimensional profile data and/or the optical imaging data.

(41) FIG. 11-13 show examples of fish fillets with gaping which could be according to (the previously mentioned) categories 2-4.

(42) FIG. 11 shows a fish fillet which could be classified into gaping category 2.

(43) FIG. 12 shows a fish fillet which could be classified into gaping category 3.

(44) FIG. 13 shows a fish fillet which could be classified into gaping category 4.

(45) FIGS. 14-17 show three-dimensional profile data and optical imaging data for a first fish fillet example.

(46) FIG. 14 shows optical image data in the form of a digital colour image (which in the present representation, however, is converted to grey tones) of the first fish fillet example. FIG. 14 shows that a candidate gaping area set based on the optical imaging data could correctly comprise gaping areas 1422A (because they can be seen in the optical image data). However, a false positive gaping area 1422B could also be included (because it could be interpreted based on the optical image data alone to be a gaping area due to the darker colour reminiscent of the colour of gaping areas, but where the darker colour in the optical image data is in fact due to a discoloration of the fish fillet item rather than topographical gaping-features).

(47) FIG. 15 shows three-dimensional image data of the first fish fillet example visualized via a grey scale representation. FIG. 15 shows that a candidate gaping area set based on the three-dimensional profile data could correctly comprise gaping areas 1528 (corresponding to gaping areas 1422A in FIG. 14) because they can be seen in the three-dimensional image data. Furthermore, the figure shows an area 1532 where no gaping is present, which enables ruling out that the (discoloration-)area 1422B in FIG. 14 is representative of a gaping area.

(48) FIG. 16 shows three-dimensional image data of the first fish fillet example (identical to the three-dimensional image data of FIG. 15) visualized via a contour line representation.

(49) FIG. 17 shows a contour line height map of the first fish fillet example identical to FIG. 16, except that gaping areas have been indicated by a full-drawn, thick line on the border of the gaping areas and a line through the middle of them.

(50) FIGS. 18-21 show a set of three-dimensional profile data and optical imaging data for a second fillet example.

(51) FIG. 18 shows optical image data in the form of a digital colour image (which in the present representation, however, is converted to grey tones) of the second fish fillet example.

(52) FIG. 19 shows three-dimensional image data of the first second fillet example visualized via a grey scale representation.

(53) FIG. 20 shows three-dimensional image data of the second fish fillet example (identical to the three-dimensional image data of FIG. 19) visualized via a contour line representation.

(54) FIG. 21 shows a contour line height map of the second fish fillet example identical to FIG. 20, except that gaping areas have been indicated by a full-drawn, thick line on the border of the gaping areas and a line through the middle of them.

(55) FIGS. 22-25 show a set of three-dimensional profile data and optical imaging data for a third fish fillet example.

(56) FIG. 22 shows optical image data in the form of a digital colour image (which in the present representation, however, is converted to grey tones) of the third fish fillet example.

(57) FIG. 23 shows three-dimensional image data of the third fish fillet example visualized via a grey scale representation.

(58) FIG. 24 shows three-dimensional image data of the third fish fillet example (identical to the three-dimensional image data of FIG. 23) visualized via a contour line representation.

(59) FIG. 25 shows a contour line height map of the third fish fillet example identical to FIG. 24, except that gaping areas have been indicated by a full-drawn, thick line on the border of the gaping areas and a line through the middle of them.

(60) Although the present invention has been described in connection with the specified embodiments, it should not be construed as being in any way limited to the presented examples. The scope of the present invention is set out by the accompanying claim set. In the context of the claims, the terms comprising or comprises do not exclude other possible elements or steps. Also, the mentioning of references such as a or an etc. should not be construed as excluding a plurality. The use of reference signs in the claims with respect to elements indicated in the figures shall also not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. Furthermore, individual features mentioned in different claims, may possibly be advantageously combined, and the mentioning of these features in different claims does not exclude that a combination of features is not possible and advantageous.