CATH2 AND DERIVATIVES FOR INHIBITING STREPTOCOCCUS SUIS
20240165200 ยท 2024-05-23
Inventors
- Maaike Riena SCHEENSTRA (Leiderdorp, NL)
- Roeland Maarten VAN HARTEN (Utrecht, NL)
- Hendrik Peter Haagsman (Zeist, NL)
- Albert Van Dijk (Zeist, NL)
- Edwin Johannes Adrianus Veldhuizen (Utrecht, NL)
Cpc classification
A61K39/39
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K2039/55561
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
The invention relates to methods for inhibiting S. suis comprising administering to CATH2 or a derivative thereof and to methods for the treatment or prevention of a S. suis infection in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering CATH2 or a derivative thereof to the subject.
Claims
1. A method for the treatment or prevention of a Streptococcus suis (S. suis) infection in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering CATH2 or a derivative thereof to the subject.
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein said S. suis is S. suis serotype 2, serotype 9, serotype 1 or serotype 3.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein said S. suis is serotype 2.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the subject in need thereof is suffering from a S. suis infection or at risk of suffering from a S. suis infection.
8. The method according to claim 1 comprising administering said CATH2 or derivative thereof to subjects of a population of subjects wherein a S. suis infection has been established in one or more subjects of said population.
9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the subject is administered the CATH2 derivative twice.
10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the subject is administered the CATH2 derivative with an interval of at least 2 days.
11. The method according to claim 1 wherein the subject is poultry and the administration is performed in ovo and/or after hatch.
12. The method according to claim 1 comprising inducing or promoting innate immune memory in the subject.
13. The method according to claim 1 comprising improving or enhancing antimicrobial treatment with an antimicrobial agent.
14. A method for inhibiting Streptococcus suis comprising administering CATH2 or a derivative thereof to the S. suis.
15. (canceled)
16. The method according to claim 1 wherein the CATH2 derivative is selected from the group consisting of DCATH2, a C-terminally and/or N-terminally truncated CATH2 and a C-terminally or N-terminally truncated DCATH2.
17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the CATH2 derivative is selected from the group consisting of DCATH2, DCATH2(1-21), DCATH2(4-21), CMAP4-21, CMAP5-21, CMAP6-21, CMAP7-21, CMAP8-21, CMAP9-21, CMAP10-21, CMAP11-21, CMAP4-21 (F5.fwdarw.W), CMAP4-21 (F5.fwdarw.Y), CMAP4-21 (F12.fwdarw.W), CMAP4-21 (F12.fwdarw.Y), CMAP4-21 (F5, F12.fwdarw.W), CMAP4-21 (F5, F12.fwdarw.Y), CMAP4-21 (F5.fwdarw.W, F12.fwdarw.Y), CMAP4-21 (F5.fwdarw.Y, F12.fwdarw.W), CMAP7-21 (F12.fwdarw.W), CMAP7-21 (F12.fwdarw.Y), CMAP10-21 (F12.fwdarw.W) and CMAP10-21 (F12.fwdarw.Y).
18. The method according to claim 16, wherein the CATH2 or derivative is DCATH2, DCATH2(1-21) or DCATH2(4-21).
19. The method according to claim 1 wherein the CATH2 or a derivative thereof is combined with an adjuvant specific for innate immunity.
20. The method according to claim 1 wherein the CATH2 or derivative thereof is administered before, after or simultaneously with a treatment with a S. suis or an antigenic part thereof.
21. The method according to claim 7 wherein the subject suffering from a S. suis infection or at risk of suffering from a S. suis infection is a subject that is in contact with subjects suffering from said infection.
22. The method according to claim 19 wherein the adjuvant specific for innate immunity is selected from the group consisting of a toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand, ?-glucan, muramyl dipeptide (MDP), Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), CpG oligodeoxynucleotide.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
Thermodynamic binding capacity of 200 ?M .sub.D-CATH2 (A), .sub.DC(1-21) (B), and .sub.DC(4-21) (C) to 200 ?M LTA-SA was measured using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Every 300 seconds, 1.99 ?l peptide solution was titrated into 164 ?l LTA solution. The corrected heat rate (?J sec.sup.?1) is plotted (top panel) and normalized integrated heat was plotted against the molar ratio between LTA and the peptide (lower panel). Experiments (N=3) were averaged before plotting and fitting an independent model. The corrected heat rate of .sub.D-CATH2, .sub.DC(1-21), and .sub.DC(4-21) is depicted for comparison (D).
[0077]
Mouse BMDM cells were cultured for 6 days. At day 1, 1.25 ?M .sub.D-CATH2 or its derivatives were added for 24 hours. At day 6 the cells were activated with different S. suis type2 strains at an MOI of 0.2. Bacteria were mixed for 5 minutes with 1.25 ?M .sub.D-CATH2 or its derivatives before stimulation. After 24 hours of stimulation, cells were analyzed by flowcytometry (A) and cytokine expression was measured (B). Data is plotted as average +/?SEM (N=3-6).
[0078]
[0079]
A schematic overview of the in vivo experiment set up. At day 1, all mice were subcutaneously injected with .sub.DC(1-21) or a control in the neck region. Either after 24 hours (24 h .sub.DC(1-21) or 7 days (7 d .sub.DC(1-21) the mice were intra-peritoneally injected with 10.sup.7 CFU S. suis P1/7 or only THB. 24 hours after infection, a few drops of blood were collected and 7 days post infection, the mice were sacrificed for analysis. The black arrows indicate the moment of animal welfare evaluation by weighing and score for clinical symptoms (A). The relative weight difference with the weight at the moment of infection is set to 100% is depicted for 24 h .sub.DC(1-21) (B) and 7 d .sub.DC(1-21) (E). The cumulative clinical score of 8 different parameters is depicted for 24 h .sub.DC(1-21) (C) and 7 d .sub.DC(1-21) (F). Survival curves are depicted and bacterial counts in different organs of mice reaching HEP is depicted for 24 h .sub.DC(1-21) (D) and 7 d .sub.DC(1-21) (G). The number of organs per mouse in which S. suis bacteria were found (H) and the average CFU per organ per mouse (I). The bacterial burden of mice died before the end of the study with circles depicting mice infected 24 hours post peptide injection and squares 7 days post peptide injection (J). Results are depicted as mean +/?S.E.M. (CNTR n=4, CNTR+S.suis n=12, .sub.DC(1-21) n=4, and .sub.DC(1-21)+S. suis n=12).
[0080]
EXAMPLES
Materials and Methods
Peptides, Bacterial Strains and Experimental Animals
[0081] The 26 amino acid full .sub.D-antiomer of chicken CATH2 (RFGRFLRKIRRFRPKVTITIQGSARF-NH.sub.2) (.sub.D-CATH2) with a net positive charge of 9 (9+) and two derivatives (.sub.DC(1-21), 8+ and .sub.D(4-21), 7+) were used in this study. The peptides were synthesized by Fmoc-chemistry at China Peptides (CPC scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and purified by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography to a purity of >95%. Lyophilized peptides were dissolved in endotoxin free water.
S. suis Serotype 2 strain P1/7, D282, 5735, and OV625 were used in this study. All strains have been previously characterized.[17] Bacterial strains were grown overnight from glycerol stocks in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) (Oxoid Ltd., London, UK) before use.
Seven- to ten-week-old Crl:CD-1 mice (both male and female) were purchased from Charles River. All mice were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions with free access to food and water under the guidelines for animal experimentation as approved by the Dutch central authority for scientific procedures on animals (CCD).
Antibacterial Activity
[0082] S. suis Serotype 2 strains P1/7, D282, S735, and OV625 were grown into mid-logarithmic phase for 3-4 hours at 37? C. in THB, after which bacteria were centrifuged at 1200?g for 10 minutes at 4? C. and resuspended in fresh THB. Concentration was determined by measuring the OD value at 620 nm with an OD of 0.1 is 1?10.sup.8 colony forming units (CFU) mL.sup.?1. 10.sup.6 CFU mL.sup.?1 S suis was mixed with different concentrations of .sub.D-CATH and derivatives (0.63?40 ?M) and left for 3 hours at 37? C. Ten-fold dilutions were prepared and spread in Tryptan Soy agar (TSA) plates containing 5% (vol/vol) defibrinated sheep blood (Oxoid) and colonies were allowed to grow for 48 hours. Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) was defined as ?100 CFU mL.sup.?1 (2 logCFU mL.sup.?1), the detection limit of the assay.
Cell Culture and Flow Cytometry
[0083] Bone marrow cells, isolated from the femur and tibia of both hindlegs, were stored in FCS/10% DMSO in liquid nitrogen. Cells were grown at a concentration of 5?10.sup.5 cells mL.sup.?1 in RPMI-1640 without phenol red (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Corning, NY, USA) and 1% Penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) and bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDC) were culture by adding 20 ng mL.sup.?1 murine recombinant M-CSF or GM-CSF (Peprotech, NJ, USA) respectively. If indicated, cells were trained by adding 1.25 ?M peptide at day 1, which was replace by fresh medium at day 2. The medium of all cells was replaced by fresh medium without antibiotics at day 3. At day 6 cells were stimulated with 1 ?g mL.sup.?1 lipoteichoic acid from S. aureus (LTA-SA) (Invivogen) or with the different S suis strains with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.2. Medium containing S. suis was removed after 2 hours and replaced by medium containing 200 ?g/ml gentamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and left for an additional 22 hours. After 24 hours, medium was collected and stored at ?20? C. for cytokine measurements. Cells were incubated for 5 min with PBS/0.5 mM EDTA after which they were resuspended by vigorous pipetting and used for flow cytometry. Cells were resuspended in flow cytometry buffer (PBS/0.5% BSA (Sigma Aldrich)) and kept on ice during the whole procedure. Cells were stained with antibodies (table 1) for 20 minutes, washed and measured using the BD FACSCanto-II (BD bioscience) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Ashland, OR, USA).
Splenocytes Activation
[0084] Mice were killed using CO.sub.2 suffocation after which the spleen were harvested. Spleen were digested with digestion buffer (1.5 WU/ml liberase TL grade (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 100 Units/ml recombinant DNAse I (Roche) for 30 minutes at 37? C. and meshed through a 40 ?m filter (BD bioscience) to prepare single cell solution using PBS/0.5 mM EDTA wash buffer. The red blood cells were lysed using an isotonic ammonium chloride buffer (155 mM NH.sub.4Cl, 10 mM KHCO.sub.3, 0.1 mM EDTA) for 5-10 minutes on ice, washed 1? with PBS, after which the cells were counted and resuspended in in high glucose DMEM (Thermo Fisher scientific, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Corning, VA, USA). 5?10.sup.5 splenocytes were added per well in a U-bottom 96-wells plate. Total splenocytes were stimulated with 1 ?g LTA-SA or the different S. suis strains at an MOI of 0.2. After 2 hours, the supernatant was collected (by centrifugation 1800 RPM, 2 min) and the cells were resuspended in 100 ?l fresh medium supplemented with 200 ?g/ml gentamycin and left for an additional 22 hours. After 24 hours, medium was collected and stored at ?20? C. for cytokine measurements.
Cell Viability and Activity
[0085] WST-1 reagent (roche) was used for cell viability of BMDCs and BMDM as well as for cell activity of activated splenocytes. In both cases, 100 ?l fresh medium containing 10% WST-1 was added and incubated at 37? C. After 30-60 minutes, colorimetric changes were measured at 450 nm using a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Ortenberg, Germany). The metabolic activity is depicted as a percentage with the untreated BMDCs/BMDMs or unstimulated splenocytes set to 100%.
ELISA
[0086] TNF?, IFN?, IL-1?, and IL-6 were measured in the supernatant (diluted in PBS/5% BSA if needed) using a Duoset ELISA kit (R&D systems, MN, USA). ELISAs were performed according manufacturer's instructions. Colorimetric changes were measured at 450 nm using a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH).
Isothermal Calorimetry (ITC)
[0087] The interaction between the .sub.D-CATH2 peptides and LTA-SA was tested using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). All ITC experiments were performed on a Low Volume NanoITC (TA instruments-Waters LLC, New Castle, USA). 800 ?M of LTA-SA or peptide solution was prepared in MilliQ after which a 4-fold dilution in dPBS (Gibco) was made. The chamber was filled with 164 ?l LTA-SA and the peptide was loaded in the syringe. Every 300 seconds, 1.99 ?L peptide was titrated into the chamber at 37? C. Data was analyzed using the Nano Analyze software (TA instruments-Waters LLC). The data of three experiments was averaged and an independent model was used to determine the peptide-LTA interaction.
In Vivo Infection Experiment
[0088] Upon arrival, mice were allowed to acclimate for at least 7 days before the start of the experiment. The experiment was performed as depicted in
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 1 Antibodies used Antigen Clone Label Manufacture MHC-II M5/114.15.2 FITC eBioscience CD11c HL3 PE BD Bioscience Sirp-? P84 PerCP- eBioscience eFluor710 CD19 1D3 PE-Cy7 BD Bioscience CD8? 53-6.7 APC BD Bioscience CD11b M1/70 APC-Cy7 BD Bioscience CD24 M1/69 eFluor450 eBioscience CD86 GL-1 PerCP BoiLegend F4/80 BM8 APC eBioscience Ly6C HK1.4 eFluor450 eBioscience CD4 RM4-5 AF488 BD Pharmingen CD62L MEL-14 PE eBioscience CD335 29A1.4 PerCP-Cy5.5 BD Bioscience CD44 IM7 PE-Cy7 BD Bioscience CD3e 145-2C11 APC-Cy7 BD Pharmingen CD25 eBio3C7 eFluor450 eBioscience Antibodies used for flow cytometry. All antibodies were diluted 1000x in flow cytometry buffer prior to use (CD19 and CD335 were used in a 500x dilution).
Statistics
[0089] Samples were compared to no-peptide-controls using two-way ANOVA with the Dunnett post-hoc test. Samples were paired for cell culture samples. *=p?0.05; **=p?0.01; ***=p?0.001;****=p?0.0001.
Results
.SUB.D.-CATH2 and its Derivatives Efficiently Kills Several S. Suis Type2 Sub-Strains in Both THB and RPMI+FCS
[0090] Antimicrobial activity of d-CATH2 and its derived peptides was assessed against 4 different S. suis serotype 2 strains. The mean bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the three peptides is 2.5-5 ?M for the four sub-strains in bacterial growth medium THB (
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 2 MBC values of D-CATH2 killing S. suis strains THB RPMI + 10% FCS D- DC DC D- DC DC CATH2 (1-21) (4-21) CATH2 (1-21) (4-21) P1/7 2.5-5 2.5 5-10 1.25-2.5 1.25 2.5 S735 1.25-2.5 2.5 2.5 0.6-2.5 1.25 2.5 D282 2.5-5 2.5-5 2.5-5 0.6-2.5 0.6-1.25 1.25-2.5 OV625 1.25-5 0.6-5 1.25-2.5 1.25-2.5 1.25 2.5 MBC values for the different peptides depending on the bacterial strain and the medium.
.SUB.D.-CATH2 and its Derivatives Inhibit LTA-SA- or S. Suis-Induced Activation by Binding to LTA
[0091] The biological form of CATH2 is known to inhibit LPS and LTA activation of a murine macrophage cell-line,[21] however, whether the full D antiomer of CATH2 is also capable of inhibiting LTA-induced of primary cultured murine BMDMs and BMDCs activation is unclear. In addition, cathelicidins can be cytotoxic to mammalian cells in higher concentrations.[19] Therefore, murine BMDMs and BMDCs were exposed to .sub.D-CATH2, .sub.DC(1-21) and .sub.DC(4-21), either added at the end of the culture (day 6) or at the beginning of the culture (day 1) to observe any effects of the peptides on the cell viability and differentiation.
BMDMs were relative sensitive to addition of .sub.D-CATH2 and its derivates, especially to .sub.DC(1-21) (
To analyze the effect of stimulation in combination with peptides, 1.25 ?M was chosen as concentration on the border of cytotoxicity, but still influencing the expression of F4/80 with macrophages. Four different sub-strains of S. suis serotype 2 were mixed with 1.25 ?M peptide and added to BMDMs at day 6. Activation of BMDMs in combination with the peptides, did not influence the percentage of macrophages as shown by flow cytometry. However, the upregulation of activation markers, like MHC-II, CD86 and CD38, was strongly inhibited by all three peptides for all four sub-strains (
To study whether to inhibitory effect on activation by the peptides to a direct interaction with LTA, the LTA binding capacity of peptides was tested using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Although LTA- and S. suis-induced activation was strongly inhibited by all three peptides, is partially explained by its direct binding to LTA. With a dissociation coefficient K.sub.d between 2-10 ?M. Interestingly, .sub.DC(1-21) bind less strong compared to the other two peptides, with a lower K.sub.d and less peptide binding to one LTA molecule (
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 3 ITC data D-CATH2 DC(1-21) DC(4-21) K.sub.d (?M) 3.039 10.22 2.12 n 0.543 0.207 1.209 ?H ?21.16 ?85.64 ?16.73 (kJ/mol) ?S 37.39 ?180.6 54.68 (J/mol .Math. K)
Overview of ITC results of the binding capacity of 200 ?M .sub.D-CATH2, .sub.DC(1-21) or .sub.D-C(4-21) to 37.2 ?M LTA-SA. K.sub.ddissociation coefficient (?M); nnumber of peptide molecules binding to one LPS molecule; ?Henthalpy changes; -?Sentropy changes.
.sub.D-CATH2 and its Derivatives Increases the BMDM Culture Efficiency To further study the effect of .sub.D-CATH2 and its derivatives on macrophages, cells were exposed to the peptides 24 hours after the start of the culture for 24 hours. The efficiency of the BMDMs was enhanced by the early exposure of the peptides, shown by a higher percentage macrophages at day 6, which was most pronounced for .sub.DC(1-21) (
Similar results were found in the BMDC culture, exposing the cells to the peptides 24 hours after the start of the culture for 24 hours. Although the percentage of BMDCs at day 6 did not change, nor was there any difference in the expression of the activation markers, the macrophage marker F4/80 was increased, indicating a skewing towards macrophage like cells (
.SUB.D.C(1-21) Reduces the Clinical Symptoms of S. Suis P1/7 in Mice
[0092] Previously, our group has shown that in ovo injection of .sub.D-CATH2 three days before hatch, protects the chickens up to 7 days post hatch for infection.[22] Since addition of .sub.D-CATH2 and more specifically .sub.DC(1-21) enhanced the efficiency of the murine BMDM culture and balanced the inflammatory response, we questioned whether injection of .sub.DC(1-21) could boost the immune response in mice as well. Therefore, mice were injected with 1 mg/kg .sub.DC(1-21) at day 1 subcutaneously and infected with 10.sup.7 CFU/ml S. suis P1/7 intraperitoneally 24 hours or 7 days post peptide injection. Mice were weighed twice a day during the acute phase of infection and daily until 7 days post infection (
[0093] Bacterial counts in the different organs were determined as well. 24 hours post infection, all mice, treated or not, had S. suis bacteria in the bloodstream between 10.sup.5-10.sup.6 CFU mL.sup.?1 (
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 4 Clinical scoring parameters for cumulative scoring of S. suis-infected mice SCORE 0 1 2 BODY WEIGHT Constant or gain >5% weight >20% weight loss loss COAT Flat and glossy Rougher Bloated BREATHING Rhythmic Rapid Rapid and abdominal DEHYDRATION Normal skin Reduced skin Persisting skin elasticity elasticity fold BEARING Normal Curved back Huddled EYES Normal Moderately Squeezed and squeezed swollen ACTIVITY Normal Reduced activity Apathy LOCOMOTION Normal Reduced Unsteady, coordination apraxia
[0094] The cumulative clinical score was defined as the sum of the clinical scoring for eight parameters. Mice were euthanized for animal welfare reasons (humanized end point (HEP)) when they endured severe clinical signs (defined as: 2 days in a row a score of 2 on 3 of the 8 points) or in case of severe weight loss (>20%).
References
[0095] 1. Staats, J. J., Feder, I., Okwumabua, O. & Chengappa, M. M. Streptococcus suis: past and present. Vet Res Commun 21, 381-407, doi:10.1023/a:1005870317757 (1997).
[0096] 2. Votsch, D., Willenborg, M., Weldearegay, Y. B. & Valentin-Weigand, P. Streptococcus suisThe Two Faces of a Pathobiont in the Porcine Respiratory Tract. Front Microbiol 9, 480, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00480 (2018).
[0097] 3. Kerdsin, A. et al. Fatal Septic Meningitis in Child Caused by Streptococcus suis Serotype 24. Emerg Infect Dis 22, 1519-1520, doi:10.3201/eid2208.160452 (2016).
[0098] 4. Segura, M., Gottschalk, M. & Olivier, M. Encapsulated Streptococcus suis inhibits activation of signaling pathways involved in phagocytosis. Infect Immun 72, 5322-5330, doi:10.1128/IAI.72.9.5322-5330.2004 (2004).
[0099] 5. Goyette-Desjardins, G., Auger, J. P., Xu, J., Segura, M. & Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg Microbes Infect 3, e45, doi:10.1038/emi.2014.45 (2014).
[0100] 6. van Dijk, A., et al., Identification of chicken cathelicidin-2 core elements involved in antibacterial and immunomodulatory activities. Mol Immunol, 2009. 46(13): p. 2465-73.
[0101] 7. van Dijk, A., et al., Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Chicken Cathelicidin-2 Derived Peptides. PLoS One, 2016. 11(2): p. e0147919.
[0102] 8. Scheenstra, M.R., et al., Cathelicidins Modulate TLR-Activation and Inflammation. Front Immunol, 2020. 11: p. 1137.
[0103] 9. Yang, D., et al., Alarmin-induced cell migration. Eur J Immunol, 2013. 43(6): p. 1412-8.
[0104] 10. Coorens, M., et al., Interspecies cathelicidin comparison reveals divergence in antimicrobial activity, TLR modulation, chemokine induction and regulation of phagocytosis. Sci Rep, 2017. 7: p. 40874.
[0105] 11. van Dijk, A., et al., Identification of chicken cathelicidin-2 core elements involved in antibacterial and immunomodulatory activities. Mol Immunol, 2009. 46(13): p. 2465-73.
[0106] 12. van Dijk, A., et al., Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Chicken Cathelicidin-2 Derived Peptides. PLoS One, 2016. 11(2): p. e0147919.
[0107] 13. Mookherjee, N., et al., Antimicrobial host defence peptides: functions and clinical potential. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2020. 19(5): p. 311-332.
[0108] 14. Garton, M., et al., Method to generate highly stable D-amino acid analogs of bioactive helical peptides using a mirror image of the entire PDB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018. 115(7): p. 1505-1510.
[0109] 15. Cuperus, T., et al., Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 26622.
[0110] 16. Schneider, V.A., et al., Prophylactic administration of chicken cathelicidin-2 boosts zebrafish embryonic innate immunity. Dev Comp Immunol, 2016. 60: p. 108-14.
[0111] 17. de Greeff, A. et al. Genetic diversity of Streptococcus suis isolates as determined by comparative genome hybridization. BMC Microbiol 11, 161, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-161 (2011)
[0112] 18. Seitz, M. et al. A novel intranasal mouse model for mucosal colonization by Streptococcus suis serotype 2. J Med Microbiol 61, 1311-1318, doi:10.1099/jmm.0.043885-0 (2012).
[0113] 19. Scheenstra, M. R. et al. Cathelicidins PMAP-36, LL-37 and CATH-2 are similar peptides with different modes of action. Sci Rep 9, 4780, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41246-6 (2019).
[0114] 20. Veldhuizen, E. J. A. et al. Antimicrobial and Immunomodulatory Activity of PMAP-23 Derived Peptides. Protein Pept Lett 24, 609-616, doi:10.2174/0929866524666170428150925 (2017).
[0115] 21. Coorens, M., Scheenstra, M. R., Veldhuizen, E. J. & Haagsman, H. P. Interspecies cathelicidin comparison reveals divergence in antimicrobial activity, TLR modulation, chemokine induction and regulation of phagocytosis. Sci Rep 7, 40874, doi:10.1038/srep40874 (2017).
[0116] 22. Cuperus, T., van Dijk, A., Matthijs, M. G., Veldhuizen, E. J. & Haagsman, H. P. Protective effect of in ovo treatment with the chicken cathelicidin analog D-CATH-2 against avian pathogenic E. coli. Sci Rep 6, 26622, doi:10.1038/srep26622 (2016).