Method for Safeguarding a Danger Zone
20240166202 ยท 2024-05-23
Inventors
- Fridtjof STEIN (Ostfildern, DE)
- Tobias SCHWALB (Leinfelden-Echterdingen, DE)
- Marcus LIEBHARDT (Waiblingen, DE)
- Wolfgang KOB (Waiblingen, DE)
Cpc classification
B60W30/0956
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/182
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W2556/45
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G08G1/166
PHYSICS
B60Q1/507
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/09
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G08G1/0962
PHYSICS
B60Q1/46
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W60/0018
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60W30/09
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/095
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W30/182
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60W60/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method for safeguarding a self-driving, damaged vehicle includes independently detecting damage of the damaged vehicle by the damaged vehicle and sending information concerning the damage to a central computing unit, connected with the damaged vehicle, of an operator of the damaged vehicle by the damaged vehicle. Information concerning the damage of the vehicle is sent to a superior authority by the central computing unit. A further central computing unit of an operator of a self-driving further vehicle located near the damaged vehicle is informed about the damaged vehicle by the superior authority. When the further vehicle is moving towards the damaged vehicle, the further vehicle is put into a safeguarding mode by the further central computing unit.
Claims
1.-3. (canceled)
4. A method for safeguarding a self-driving, damaged vehicle (1), comprising the steps of: independently detecting damage of the damaged vehicle (1) by the damaged vehicle (1) and sending information concerning the damage to a central computing unit (R1), connected with the damaged vehicle (1), of an operator of the damaged vehicle (1) by the damaged vehicle (1); sending information concerning the damage of the vehicle (1) to a superior authority (I) by the central computing unit (R1); informing a further central computing unit (R2) of an operator of a self-driving further vehicle (3) located near the damaged vehicle (1) about the damaged vehicle (1) by the superior authority (I); and when the further vehicle (3) is moving towards the damaged vehicle (1), putting the further vehicle (3) into a safeguarding mode by the further central computing unit (R2).
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein, in the safeguarding mode, depending on a situation caused by the damaged vehicle (1), a current driving speed of the further vehicle (3) is reduced and a hazard warning light (W) is switched on.
6. A device, comprising: a vehicle configured to independently detect damage of the vehicle (1) and send information concerning the damage to a central computing unit (R1), connected with the vehicle (1), of an operator of the vehicle (1); and a central computing unit (R1) configured to send information concerning the damage of the vehicle (1) to a superior authority (I), wherein the superior authority (I) is configured to inform a further central computing unit (R2) of an operator of a self-driving further vehicle (3) located near the vehicle (1) about the vehicle (1) and wherein the further central computing unit (R2) is configured to put the further vehicle (3) into a safeguarding mode when the further vehicle (3) is moving towards the vehicle (1).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008]
[0009]
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] Parts that correspond to one another are provided with the same reference characters in all figures.
[0014] In
[0015] Self-driving further vehicles 2, 3 are approaching the damaged vehicle 1 on both lanes F1, F2. Another vehicle 4 is located on a slip road A to the section of road F, wherein the slip road A joins the section of road F after the broken-down damaged vehicle 1 in the direction of travel.
[0016] All the vehicles 1 to 4 shown in the exemplary embodiment according to
[0017] The damaged vehicle 1 and a first further vehicle 2 belong to an operator, in particular to a logistics company, wherein these two vehicles 1, 2 are connected with one and the same central computing unit R1.
[0018] A second, further vehicle 3 is assigned to another operator and is connected with a further central computing unit R2.
[0019] The central computing unit R1 and the further central computing unit R2 are, in turn, connected with a superior authority I, for example a service provider.
[0020] For example, the vehicle 1 has broken down due to a technical failure of the comparatively complexly designed towing vehicle or the vehicle 1 has been involved in an accident.
[0021] The vehicle 1 has a communication unit K via which the vehicle 1 is connected with the central computing unit R1, so that in such a situation, help is requested from the central computing unit R1 by the damaged vehicle 1.
[0022] A comparatively long period of time can, however, pass until this help arrives, during which the damaged vehicle 1 represents a danger for other road users. For example, there is the danger that the vehicle 1, as is shown in
[0023] In order to significantly reduce the risk of a hazard to other road users in such a case, a method described in the following is provided.
[0024] If the vehicle 1 has broken down, it detects its damage itself and connects itself with the central computing unit R1, whereby the latter is sent information concerning the damage. In particular, the reason for the damage as well as a position of the vehicle 1 are shared with the central computing unit R1.
[0025] The central computing unit R1 subsequently sends information concerning the damage of the vehicle 1 to the superior authority I, which, in turn, sends corresponding information to the further central computing unit R2, in order to inform all self-driving further vehicles 2, 3 that are approaching the damaged vehicle 1 on the section of road F about this. The risk of a collision with the damaged vehicle 1 can therefore, for example, be at least significantly reduced.
[0026] Here, in addition to a typical transfer of information to manned vehicles by means of radio and/or by means of certain subscribed information channels, sending the information concerning the damage of the vehicle 1 takes place in particular in the form of application programs, so-called apps.
[0027] If the further vehicles 2, 3 approaching the damaged vehicle 1 have received the information about the broken-down damaged vehicle 1 on the section of road F ahead from their respective central computing unit R1, R2, then the further vehicles 2, 3 are put into a situation-dependent safeguarding mode.
[0028] The other vehicle 4 located on the slip road A may also receive the information about the damaged vehicle 1, wherein the other vehicle 4, since it is not approaching the damaged vehicle 1, is not put into the safeguarding mode.
[0029] In relation to the safeguarding mode, there are different situation-dependent behavior modes, whereby the further vehicles 2, 3 approaching the damaged vehicle 1 reduce their current driving speed and give out corresponding signals on the outside of the respective vehicle 2, 3. In particular, the self-driving further vehicles 2, 3 activate their hazard warning lights W.
[0030] If the damaged vehicle 1 is burning, then the further vehicles 2, 3 approaching the vehicle 1 respectively reduce their current driving speed in the safeguarding mode and block a travel path in the direction of travel, in particular in the direction of the burning vehicle 1, with flashing signals being given out, in particular by means of the hazard warning light W.
[0031] If the damaged vehicle 1 blocks the lanes F1, F2, as is shown in
[0032] If the damaged vehicle 1 is on a hard shoulder S of the section of road F, the further vehicles 2, 3 pass the damaged vehicle 1 with reduced driving speed, optionally with activated hazard warning lights, as is shown in
[0033] In particular, a current traffic situation on the section of road F is determined, whereby it is detected whether little traffic, heavy traffic, slow traffic, stop-and-go traffic or a traffic jam prevails.
[0034] The damaged vehicle 1 sends information about the current traffic situation in relation to the last kilometre before the damage to the central computing unit R1. Additionally, the damaged vehicle 1 reports to the central computing unit R1 how a current traffic situation in the region of a danger zone formed by the vehicle 1 is developing in an ongoing manner, provided that the vehicle 1 is capable of doing this.
[0035] Both further vehicles 2, 3 also report the conditions prevailing on the section of road F to the corresponding central computing unit R1, R2 of their respective operator. In the respective central computing unit R1, R2, a target speed is then, for example, identified, with which the further vehicles 2, 3 approach the danger zone.
[0036]
[0037] The environment sensor system has, for example, a rear-facing sensor 5, a front-facing beam sensor 6 and a front-facing image sensor 7.
[0038] Detected signals of the environment sensor system are supplied for analysing and processing by an on-board computing unit 8, which is additionally connected with the communication unit K and a position-determining unit 9 of the vehicle 1.
[0039] The computing unit 8 of the vehicle 1 with an exemplary method sequence in relation to the damaged vehicle 1 is represented in
[0040] The signals detected by means of the environment sensor system, i.e., the signals detected by means of the rear-facing sensor 5, the front-facing beam sensor 6 and the front-facing image sensor 7, are supplied to the computing unit 8.
[0041] In the computing unit 8, signal processing V, a fusion Fu, occurs, whereby, based on an internal digital map Kt of the position-determining unit 9 a localization L takes place.
[0042] The fused signals as well as a position of the vehicle 1 identified by means of the digital map Kt are supplied to a safeguarding module M. Here, the safeguarding module M is a component of a so-called behavior/planning module B of the computing unit 8.
[0043] A communication that occurred with the central computing unit R1 is analysed by means of a communication analysis KA, whereby, in accordance with the damage of the vehicle 1, a procedure A1 for a roadblock, a procedure A2 for a slow drive past and a procedure A3 for hazardous goods are stored.
[0044] A respectively identified situation-dependent procedure A1 to A3 is supplied to a module M1 for situation analysis and planning, which is, in turn, connected with a trajectory generator T for identifying a trajectory.
[0045] A respectively identified trajectory is then supplied to an actuator Ak of the further vehicles 2, 3, in order to also safeguard the damaged vehicle 1 in accordance with the present damage.
[0046] In
[0047] Two indicator panels AT are arranged in the rear region of the further vehicles 2, 3, that indicate to following traffic that an accident has taken place on the section of road F ahead.
[0048] The following traffic is therefore informed, so that the risk of a resulting accident with the broken-down vehicle 1 can be significantly reduced and the following traffic can potentially use a slip road in order to leave the section of road F.
[0049] In a possible embodiment of the method, an operator of the second further vehicle 3 can request a fee from the operator of the damaged vehicle 1 for its safeguarding support. This can, for example, be calculated in accordance with costs incurred for the operator of the second further vehicle 3 due to a delay as a result of the safeguarding.
[0050] Once the damaged vehicle 1 no longer represents a danger zone on the section of road F, the safeguarding mode of the further vehicles 2, 3 is ended and deactivated.