Synthetic Target Material for Shaped Charge Performance Evaluation, Powdered Metal
20190242866 ยท 2019-08-08
Assignee
Inventors
- Ian Douglas Rudnik (Vassar, MI, US)
- Christopher Brian Sokolove (Midlothian, TX, US)
- Laura Montoya Ashton (Ithaca, NY, US)
- Morgan Tompkins (Tijeras, NM, US)
Cpc classification
F41J1/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E21B43/119
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
F42B35/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F42B1/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F42B35/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
E21B43/119
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A shaped charge target apparatus and method for using a target composed of synthetic material, thereby allowing for repeatable testing at a variety of density and hardness values.
Claims
1. A method for testing a shaped charge comprising: pressing a powdered material into a disc; sintering the disc; placing the disc proximate to a shaped charge; and firing the shaped charge into the disc.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disc is between 1 and 4 inches diameter.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising placing a metal plate between the shaped charge and the disc.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising hardness testing the disc.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising stacking one or more discs underneath the first disc to form a plurality of discs.
6. The method of claim 5, further comprising placing the plurality discs in a test fixture.
7. The method of claim 6, further comprising saturating the plurality of discs with a fluid.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising applying a compressive radial stress to the plurality of discs.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising applying a compressive axial stress to the plurality of discs.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the powdered material including a wax powdered component.
11. A shaped charge test apparatus comprising: a first end cap adapted to accept a shaped charge; a second end cap; and a body containing a hollow cylindrical interior holding a plurality of synthetic target discs.
12. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 11 further comprising a first reservoir within the body contains a first fluid.
13. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 11 further comprising a second reservoir within the first end cap containing a second fluid.
14. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 11 wherein the synthetic target discs are composed of sintered powdered material.
15. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 14 wherein the powdered material is composed of a metallic powder.
16. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 11 wherein a shape charge is oriented to fire through the second fluid and the plurality of synthetic target discs.
17. The shaped charge test apparatus of claim 11 wherein the second end cap has a through opening.
18. A shaped charge test apparatus comprising: a cylindrical fixture with a hollow portion adapted for accepting a plurality of synthetic target cylinders about its outer surface, and having a hallow annulus adapted to accept a perforating gun.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the plurality of synthetic target cylinders are perpendicular to the outer surface of the cylindrical fixture.
20. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein each synthetic target cylinder further comprises a plurality of synthetic targets stacked inside.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein each synthetic target comprises a sintered powdered material in a cylindrical shape.
22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises powdered iron.
23. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises powdered carbon.
24. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises powdered copper.
25. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises powdered molybdenum.
26. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a density of approximately 3.34 g/cc and a hardness of approximately 61.1 HRP.
27. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a density of approximately 4.35 g/cc and a hardness of approximately 70.3 HRP.
28. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a density of approximately 4.69 g/cc and a hardness of approximately 75.4 HRP.
29. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a density of approximately 5.34 g/cc and a hardness of approximately 92.2 HRP.
30. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a density range of 2.7 g/cc to 8 g/cc.
31. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the sintered powdered material comprises a hardness range of 48.8593 HRP to 128.1844 HRP.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] For a thorough understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which reference numbers designate like or similar elements throughout the several figures. Briefly:
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLES OF THE INVENTION
[0023] In the following description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity, and examples. No unnecessary limitations are implied and such terms are used for descriptive purposes only and are intended to be broadly construed. The different apparatus and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives, and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims.
[0024] Referring to an example shown in
[0025] An example synthetic target is shown in
[0026] An example of a powder mix for the synthetic target 101 may include North American Hoganas R 12 Fe with 10% RXM 100 Cu powder plus 1.5% Mo (325 mesh), +1.5% graphite, and Asbury 1651+0.75% Acrawax X atomized lubricant powder. Wax and lubricating additives can be used in the powder mix. Common examples of lubricating additives include carbon or graphite. The wax and lubricating additives make the powder metal easier to process. Furthermore, during the sintering process the wax and lubricating additives burn off and create voids in the synthetic target 101. These voids give the synthetic target 101 its low density and high porosity if that is desired. The range of likely densities sought for the synthetic targets is between 2.7 and 8.0 g/cc. The potential hardness values associated with that range of density is from 40 to 150 HRP.
[0027] An important advantage of synthetic targets over concrete is that they are shelf stable. Synthetic targets can be stored for long periods of time without changing their performance. However, concrete continues to cure, thus making it stronger and harder with time.
[0028] An advantage of using synthetic targets is that it the density and hardness are easily changed in order to accommodate specific testing requirements. For example, a pressed density of 3.5 g/cc may result in a sintered density of 3.56 g/cc and a Brinell hardness of 23.3 HB 10/500. Another example may include a pressed density of 4.4 g/cc, resulting in a sintered density of 4.34 g/cc and a Brinell hardness of 43.2 HB 10/500. Another example may include a pressed density of 5.0 g/cc, resulting in a sintered density of 4.84 g/cc and a Brinell hardness of 56.7 HB 10/500. Another example may include a pressed density of 5.6 g/cc, resulting in a sintered density of 5.4 g/cc and a Brinell hardness of 71.8 HB 10/500. These examples provide the ability to evaluate shaped charge performance across a broad range of formation stresses and naturally occurring rocks with differing properties.
[0029] In some applications Rockwell Hardness P (HRP) is a better measurement of hardness for synthetic targets. In at least one example, a measured density of 3.34 g/cc corresponds to an average measured hardness of approximately 61.1 HRP. In at least another example, a measured density of 4.35 g/cc corresponds to an average measured hardness of approximately 70.3 HRP. In at least another example, a measured density of 4.69 g/cc corresponds to an average measured hardness of approximately 75.4 HRP. In at least another example, a measured density of 5.34 g/cc corresponds to an average measured hardness of approximately 92.2 HRP. In another example the density may range from 2.7 g/cc to 8 g/cc, corresponding to a range of hardness of approximately 48.8593 HRP to 128.1844 HRP.
[0030] Referring to an example shown in
[0031] Referring to
[0032] The test fixture 61 contains a body 57, a top cap 54, and a bottom cap 60. The bottom cap 60 may have an opening to atmosphere or it may be sealed with a base plate. The base plate may have a hole that may include threads or some other mechanism for adapting the hole to a fitting. The test fixture 61 may include a fluid space 58 that wraps around the test fixture in 360 degrees. The fluid space 58 may be pressurized in order to apply a radial pressure against the formation material 59.
[0033] Another test setup is illustrated in
[0034] Another test setup may include a shaped charge attached to a synthetic target as shown in
[0035] In the test setup show in in
[0036] Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments which are set forth in detail, it should be understood that this is by illustration only and that the invention is not necessarily limited thereto. Alternative embodiments and operating techniques will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the present disclosure. Accordingly, modifications of the invention are contemplated which may be made without departing from the spirit of the claimed invention.