Thermal Attenuation Structure For Detonation Combustion System
20190242582 ยท 2019-08-08
Inventors
- Arthur Wesley Johnson (Cincinnati, OH, US)
- Steven Clayton Vise (Loveland, OH, US)
- Clayton Stuart Cooper (Loveland, OH, US)
- Joseph Zelina (Waynesville, OH, US)
- Sibtosh Pal (Mason, OH, US)
Cpc classification
F02C5/11
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2240/35
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F05D2220/32
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02C3/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23R7/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23R2900/03042
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F23R3/286
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02T50/60
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
F23R3/56
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F02C3/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A rotating detonation combustion (RDC) system including a detonation chamber wall extended along a longitudinal direction. The detonation chamber wall defines a detonation chamber radially in between the detonation chamber walls. The RDC system further includes a fuel-oxidizer nozzle defining a first convergent-divergent nozzle disposed upstream of the detonation chamber, and a gas nozzle defining a second convergent-divergent nozzle extended through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along the longitudinal direction. The gas nozzle provides a flow of gas into the detonation chamber at least partially co-directional to the detonation chamber wall.
Claims
1. A rotating detonation combustion (RDC) system, the RDC system comprising: a detonation chamber wall extended along a longitudinal direction, wherein the detonation chamber wall defines a detonation chamber radially inward thereof; a fuel-oxidizer nozzle defining a first convergent-divergent nozzle disposed upstream of the detonation chamber; and a gas nozzle defining a second convergent-divergent nozzle extended through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along the longitudinal direction, wherein the gas nozzle provides a flow of gas into the detonation chamber at least partially co-directional to the detonation chamber wall.
2. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the gas nozzle is disposed between the fuel-oxidizer nozzle and the detonation chamber wall, and wherein the gas nozzle is disposed upstream of the detonation chamber.
3. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the gas nozzle is defined through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along a radial direction relative to a combustion centerline.
4. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the RDC system comprises a plurality of gas nozzle extended through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along a radial direction relative to a combustion centerline, wherein the plurality of gas nozzle are disposed in an adjacent circumferential arrangement through the detonation chamber wall relative to the combustion centerline.
5. The RDC system of claim 4, wherein the plurality of gas nozzle are further disposed in an adjacent arrangement along the longitudinal direction through the detonation chamber wall.
6. The RDC system of claim 5, wherein each longitudinal position of the plurality of gas nozzle defines an increasing pressure ratio along a downstream direction from the fuel-oxidizer nozzle, wherein the pressure ratio is relative to a pressure plenum and the detonation chamber.
7. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the gas nozzle is disposed at an acute angle through the detonation chamber wall.
8. The RDC system of claim 7, wherein the detonation chamber wall defines a longitudinally extended portion within the detonation chamber, wherein the longitudinally extended portion is extended downstream of the gas nozzle to direct the flow of gas at least partially co-directional to the detonation chamber wall.
9. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the gas nozzle is defined annularly around the combustion centerline.
10. The RDC system of claim 1, wherein the RDC system comprises a plurality of the gas nozzle disposed in an adjacent arrangement around a circumferential direction around the combustion centerline.
11. A heat engine, comprising: an inlet section through which a flow of oxidizer enters the heat engine; an expansion section through which a flow of combustion products exits the heat engine; and a rotating detonation combustion system disposed in serial arrangement between the inlet section and the expansion section, the RDC system comprising: a detonation chamber wall extended along a longitudinal direction, wherein the detonation chamber wall defines a detonation chamber radially inward thereof; a fuel-oxidizer nozzle defining a first convergent-divergent nozzle disposed upstream of the detonation chamber; and a gas nozzle defining a second convergent-divergent nozzle extended through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along the longitudinal direction, wherein the gas nozzle provides a flow of gas into the detonation chamber at least partially co-directional to the detonation chamber wall.
12. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the gas nozzle of the RDC system is disposed radially between the fuel-oxidizer nozzle and the detonation chamber wall, and wherein the gas nozzle is disposed upstream of the detonation chamber.
13. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the gas nozzle of the RDC system is defined through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along a radial direction relative to a combustion centerline.
14. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the RDC system comprises a plurality of gas nozzle extended through the detonation chamber wall at least partially along a radial direction relative to a combustion centerline, wherein the plurality of gas nozzle are disposed in an adjacent circumferential arrangement through the detonation chamber wall relative to the combustion centerline.
15. The heat engine of claim 14, wherein the plurality of gas nozzle are further disposed in an adjacent arrangement along the longitudinal direction through the detonation chamber wall.
16. The heat engine of claim 15, wherein each longitudinal position of the plurality of gas nozzle defines an increasing pressure ratio along a downstream direction from the fuel-oxidizer nozzle, wherein the pressure ratio is relative to a pressure plenum and the detonation chamber.
17. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the gas nozzle of the RDC system is disposed at an acute angle through the detonation chamber wall.
18. The heat engine of claim 17, wherein the detonation chamber wall defines a longitudinally extended portion within the detonation chamber, wherein the longitudinally extended portion is extended downstream of the gas nozzle to direct the flow of gas at least partially co-directional to the detonation chamber wall.
19. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the gas nozzle is defined annularly around the combustion centerline.
20. The heat engine of claim 11, wherein the RDC system comprises a plurality of the gas nozzle disposed in an adjacent arrangement around a circumferential direction around the combustion centerline.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022] Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0023] Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
[0024] As used herein, the terms first, second, and third may be used interchangeably to distinguish one component from another and are not intended to signify location or importance of the individual components.
[0025] The terms forward and aft refer to relative positions within a heat engine or vehicle, and refer to the normal operational attitude of the heat engine or vehicle. For example, with regard to a heat engine, forward refers to a position closer to a heat engine inlet and aft refers to a position closer to a heat engine nozzle or exhaust.
[0026] The terms upstream and downstream refer to the relative direction with respect to fluid flow in a fluid pathway. For example, upstream refers to the direction from which the fluid flows, and downstream refers to the direction to which the fluid flows.
[0027] The singular forms a, an, and the include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
[0028] Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, is applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as about, approximately, and substantially, are not to be limited to the precise value specified. In at least some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value, or the precision of the methods or machines for constructing or manufacturing the components and/or systems. For example, the approximating language may refer to being within a 10 percent margin.
[0029] Here and throughout the specification and claims, range limitations are combined and interchanged, such ranges are identified and include all the sub-ranges contained therein unless context or language indicates otherwise. For example, all ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other.
[0030] Embodiments of a heat engine 10 including a rotating detonation combustion (RDC) system are generally provided. The embodiments shown and described herein provide structures that improve durability of the RDC system such as via a thermal attenuation structure. The embodiments of the RDC system described herein include a convergent-divergent gas nozzle that provides film cooling to a detonation chamber wall to attenuate adverse effects of a higher heat flux and increasing pressure gradient resulting from detonative combustion in contrast to deflagrative combustion. As such, embodiments of the RDC system generally shown and described herein may improve RDC system durability that may further enable integration of RDC systems into heat engines commercial, industrial, or military apparatuses requiring durability generally provided with deflagrative combustion systems.
[0031] Referring now to the figures,
[0032] As will be discussed in further detail below, at least a portion of the flow of oxidizer 79 is mixed with a liquid or gaseous fuel 83 (or combinations thereof, or combinations of liquid fuel with a gas) and detonated to generate combustion products 85 (
[0033] As will be appreciated, in various embodiments of the heat engine 10 defining a gas turbine engine, rotation of the turbine(s) within the expansion section 30 generated by the combustion products 85 is transferred through one or more shafts or spools to drive the compressor(s) within the inlet section 20. In various embodiments, the inlet section 20 may further define a fan section, such as for a turbofan engine configuration, such as to propel air across a bypass flowpath outside of the RDC system 100 and expansion section 30.
[0034] It will be appreciated that the heat engine 10 depicted schematically in
[0035] Moreover, it should also be appreciated that the RDC system 100 may further be incorporated into any other suitable aeronautical heat engine, such as a turboshaft engine, a turboprop engine, a turbojet engine, a ramjet engine, a scramjet engine, etc. Further, in certain embodiments, the RDC system 100 may be incorporated into a non-aeronautical heat engine, such as a land-based or marine-based power generation system. Further still, in certain embodiments, the RDC system 100 may be incorporated into any other suitable heat engine, such as a rocket or missile engine. With one or more of the latter embodiments, the heat engine may not include a compressor in the inlet section 20 or a turbine in the expansion section 30.
[0036] Referring now to
[0037] In various embodiments, such as generally depicted in
[0038] Referring briefly to
[0039] More particularly, it will be appreciated that the RDC system 100 is of a detonation-type combustor, deriving energy from the continuous detonation wave 230. For a detonation combustor, such as the RDC system 100 disclosed herein, the combustion of the fuel/oxidizer mixture 84 is effectively a detonation as compared to a burning, as is typical in the traditional deflagration-type combustors. Accordingly, a main difference between deflagration and detonation is linked to the mechanism of flame propagation. In deflagration, the flame propagation is a function of the heat transfer from a reactive zone to the fresh mixture, generally through conduction. By contrast, with a detonation combustor, the detonation is a shock induced flame, which results in the coupling of a reaction zone and a shockwave. The shockwave compresses and heats the fresh fuel-oxidizer mixture 84, increasing such fuel-oxidizer mixture 84 above a self-ignition point. On the other side, energy released by the combustion contributes to the propagation of the detonation shockwave 230. Further, with continuous detonation, the detonation wave 230 propagates around the combustion chamber 115 in a continuous manner, operating at a relatively high frequency. Additionally, the detonation wave 230 may be such that an average pressure inside the combustion chamber 115 is higher than an average pressure within typical combustion systems (i.e., deflagration combustion systems). Accordingly, the region 234 behind the detonation wave 230 has very high pressures.
[0040] Referring back to
[0041] The gas nozzle 110 provides the flow of gas 82 alongside or through the detonation chamber wall 105 to provide thermal attenuation (e.g., cooling) at the detonation chamber wall 105 to mitigate deleterious effects of the high heat and pressure generated during detonation of the fuel-oxidizer mixture 84. The flow of gas 82 entering the convergent-divergent structure of the gas nozzle 110 provides a wall of film cooling 101 adjacent to the detonation chamber wall 105. The convergent-divergent gas nozzle 110 further defines a throat 109 to minimize flow from downstream to upstream during each cycle of detonation in the detonation chamber 115. As such, the gas nozzle 110 provides a stream of film cooling 101 adjacent along the length of the detonation chamber wall 105, providing a buffer from the combustion products 85, or from the combustion products 85 defined by the detonation wave 230 (
[0042] Referring now to the embodiments generally provided in
[0043] Referring still to the detailed view of a portion of the RDC system 100 generally provided in
[0044] Referring still to
[0045] Referring now to
[0046] This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.