Hydroelectric power system and pump
10371119 ยท 2019-08-06
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F04B1/16
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B13/264
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02E10/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F04B1/146
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B17/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B1/2078
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02E60/16
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F04B1/148
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B1/145
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B13/26
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02E10/20
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F03B13/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F04B1/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B13/26
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B1/16
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B17/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B1/20
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F03B13/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A hydroelectric power system and pump suitable for the system are disclosed which can make efficient use of the energy available in water flows with considerably variable flow rates. A simple, compact variable displacement axial piston pump can be operated so as to provide an essentially constant output pumping pressure and variable output volume that varies efficiently in accordance with water flow rate. The system is particularly suitable for shoreline tidal power generation and provides firm power output throughout the tidal slacks occurring during the tidal reversals.
Claims
1. A hydropower pump comprising: a variable displacement piston pump comprising a rotating shaft, a fixed piston cylinder cluster, a fixed manifold and valve assembly, a piston assembly, a rotating swash plate pivot assembly, and a control assembly for adjusting the angle of the swash plates in the swash plate pivot assembly; and a waterwheel blade directly connected to the rotating shaft.
2. A hydroelectric power system for generating tidal power comprising: the hydropower pump of claim 1; a pier comprising the hydropower pump wherein the pier is anchored to a seabed location to orient the waterwheel blade with respect to the tide; an upper reservoir for accumulating pumpwater pumped by the hydropower pump; a hydro turbine for generating electrical power; a penstock for piping pumpwater from the hydropower pump to the upper reservoir and for piping pumpwater from the hydropower pump and from the upper reservoir through the hydro turbine; a piping network for providing pumpwater from an outlet of the hydropower pump to the penstock; and a controller for controlling the control assembly in the hydropower pump.
3. The hydroelectric power system of claim 2 comprising: a lower reservoir for accumulating pumpwater passing through the hydro turbine; the penstock is additionally for piping pumpwater from the hydropower pump and from the upper reservoir through the hydro turbine and to the lower reservoir; and the piping network is additionally for returning pumpwater from the lower reservoir to an inlet of the hydropower pump.
4. A method for generating hydroelectric power comprising: identifying a source of flowing water wherein the a water speed of the flowing water varies over a range greater than about 1 m/s in breadth; providing a hydropower pump including a variable displacement piston pump having a rotating shaft, a fixed piston cylinder cluster, a fixed manifold and valve assembly, a piston assembly, a rotating swash plate pivot assembly, and a control assembly for adjusting an angle of swash plates in the swash plate pivot assembly, the hydropower pump also including a waterwheel blade directly connected to the rotating shaft of the variable displacement piston pump; providing a supply of pumpwater; positioning the waterwheel blade in the flowing water such that the rotating shaft rotates with the flowing water and pumps pumpwater from the supply; controlling the angle of the swash plates in the pump such that the angle is decreased and increased in accordance with a respective decrease and increase in water speed of the flowing water while maintaining an essentially constant output pressure of pumpwater from the pump over most of the water speed range; and storing the pumped pumpwater in an upper reservoir positioned above the hydropower pump.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the pump shaft rotates at speeds in the range from 0 to about 10 rpm.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein the water speed varies over a range up to about 5 m/s in breadth.
7. The method of claim 4 wherein the mean speed of the flowing water is greater than or equal to 1.6 m/s.
8. The method of claim 4 wherein the source of flowing water is tidal.
9. A hydropower pump comprising: a variable displacement piston pump selected from the group consisting of a variable displacement axial piston pump and a variable displacement radial piston pump, the variable displacement piston pump comprising a rotating shaft, a fixed piston cylinder cluster, a fixed manifold and valve assembly, a piston assembly, a rotating assembly adjusting displacement, and a control assembly controlling the rotating assembly; and a waterwheel blade directly connected to the rotating shaft.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10) Certain terminology is used in the present description and is intended to be interpreted according to the definitions provided below. In addition, terms such as a and comprises are to be taken as open-ended. Further, all US patent publications and other patent and non-patent references cited herein are intended to be incorporated by reference in their entirety.
(11) Herein, the term about in quantitative contexts is to be construed as meaning plus or minus 10%.
(12) The hydroelectric power system of the disclosure is particularly suited to harness shoreline tidal or other hydro energy available in water flows characterized by considerably variable flow rates. The system comprises a variable displacement piston pump which is operated so as to provide an essentially constant output pumping pressure and variable output volume over most of the range of available water flow rates. (Essentially constant output pumping pressure can be maintained except at water speeds near zero.) Desirably, the system provides firm power output throughout the tidal slacks occurring during the tidal reversals.
(13) An exemplary hydroelectric power system is shown in the schematic of
(14) In the embodiment of
(15) As water flows under hydropower pump 2 with the rise and fall of the tide, waterwheel blade 4 drives axial piston pump 3 which in turn pumps pumpwater received at axial piston pump inlet 9 from lower reservoir 12 (sump) out from axial piston pump outlet 10 to penstock 13.
(16)
(17) Hydroelectric power system 1 additionally comprises upper reservoir 14 for accumulating pumpwater pumped by hydropower pump 2. Upper reservoir 14 is positioned at a suitable elevated location somewhere on land 15. Hydro turbine 16 is used to generate electrical power from pumpwater provided from penstock 13.
(18) Penstock 13 pipes pumpwater from hydropower pump 2 to upper reservoir 14 for storage during periods of relatively high tidal flow or generally during periods where the supply of pumped pumpwater exceeds demand from hydro turbine 16. Penstock 13 also pipes pumpwater directly from hydropower pump 2 and/or from upper reservoir 14 to hydro turbine 16 in accordance with electrical demand and in accordance with the supply of pumpwater available from hydropower pump 2 at any given time.
(19) After passing through hydro turbine 16, pumpwater is returned to lower reservoir 12 and is thus available again as a supply of pumpwater for hydropower pump 2. Hydroelectric power system 1 comprises a piping network (not called out in
(20) System 1 thus employs a relatively closed circuit subsystem for handling pumpwater and thus the supply of pumpwater may only need to be refreshed from time to time. Preferably a supply of fresh water is employed for pumpwater as this reduces problems associated with corrosion, marine growth, or the like.
(21) As shown in
(22) Energy from tidal flow is transferred to axial piston pump 3 via rotation of waterwheel 4. Axial piston pump 3 is designed to operate and pump in either rotation direction and does not need to operate at a constant rpm. Further, axial piston pump 3 can operate at speeds as low as one revolution per minute and thus extract the maximum amount of energy from waterwheel area in flow without the necessity for a speed increase gearbox.
(23) Axial piston pump 3 is operated so as to maintain a constant output pressure regardless of the input torque from the waterwheel by adjusting the stroke and output volume relative to tidal flow speeds throughout most of the entire tide cycle. During periods of high tidal flows, the pump stroke can be reduced thereby allowing the waterwheel to freewheel in order to maintain the volumes required to be pumped or alternatively to shut down the system. During times of high flow velocity in a given tide cycle, the volume of water pumped will typically exceed the volume demanded from hydro turbine 16. This excess volume will accumulate in upper reservoir 14 and flow back down penstock 13 to hydro turbine 16 during periods of slack tide.
(24) A controller (not called out in
(25) Other design details and operation considerations may generally be specific to a given site where the power is to be generated and to the amount of electricity demanded. For sites with very limited reservoir capacity, the system's firm power output will be the 24 hour average of the volumes pumped throughout the daily tide cycles and based on the days of the least tidal movement. For sites with larger reservoir potential the firm capacity will be the average of the annual volumes pumped.
(26) Calculated examples are provided below which illustrate additional details of construction and operation for two possible designs and sizes of power plants modeled using tidal flows and characteristics at Juskatla Narrows in British Columbia, Canada. It is expected that those skilled in the art will readily be able to adapt the system design and operation to other sites and electrical power needs. Of course, the typical stream flow velocities, volumes, and other tide conditions at the desired identified site need to be determined and considered. And designs, sizing, and location for a waterwheel, variable displacement axial piston pump, reservoirs, hydro turbine, etc. that are appropriate for the site conditions must then be determined.
(27) Particular considerations include the design of the mounting arrangement for the hydropower pump. For instance, as have been used for waterwheels on floating mills historically, the hull design of barge 5 can be used to concentrate and accelerate tidal water flow between catamaran style hulls where waterwheel 4 engages the stream. Another significant consideration is the design of waterwheel 4. As is known in the art, the paddle design employed in a given situation may have a significant effect on operating efficiency.
(28) The variable displacement, piston pump employed in the hydroelectric system is also an important consideration and design details can have a significant impact on performance. An axial pump suitable for such applications is illustrated in
(29)
(30) Pump 20 also comprises rotating swash plate pivot assembly 33 which includes a pair of pivoting swash plate subassemblies 34 and 35 at each end of shaft 23 inboard of each piston assembly 28, 29. Pivoting swash plate subassemblies 34 and 35 are connected to shaft 23 (and thus rotate therewith) and are additionally capable of pivoting with respect to the axis of shaft 23. Rotating swash plate pivot assembly 33 also comprises swash plate adjustment subassembly 36 which is connected to each pivoting swash plate subassembly 34, 35 and mounted so as to cause each swash plate subassembly 34, 35 to pivot according to the length of swash plate adjustment subassembly 36.
(31) In the embodiment shown in
(32) An outline of the location of waterwheel 40 is also shown in
(33) The swash plate inclination or angle of pivoting swash plate subassemblies 34 and 35 is adjusted using a simple hydraulic control system such that the primary control input is the pump output pressure. At low stream speeds, there is relatively less power available for pumping, and so the swash plate angle is set at a shallow inclination, thus shortening piston stroke, maximizing mechanical advantage, and maintaining both the required output pressure and some flow to the upper reservoir even at low speed. As stream speed increases, output force (torque) increases, and the swash plate angle can be increased, thus increasing piston stroke and hence flow of pumpwater. Once the swash plate angle reaches the maximum allowable, the rotational speed of waterwheel 40 is allowed to increase relative to stream flow, thus increasing the pumpwater flow as well. At faster stream flows, once the swash plate angle has reached maximum, waterwheel 40 is allowed to spin faster but will no longer operate at its maximum potential power output and efficiency. (It is thus desirable to be able to achieve greater swash plate angles and thereby obtain the greatest possible efficiency over a wider range of stream flows.) Further details of the construction of variable displacement, axial piston pump 20 are shown in
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38) Shaft 23 may be constructed of steel box tubing fitted internally with steel pipe and stitch welded together to prevent distortion under load. Shaft 23 can extend the width of the pump, carried by bearings mounted in the centre of housing frame 21 on either end. The bearing spindles may be hollow tubing in order to allow access for hydraulic lines and mounting of rotary manifold 50. A centre flange may be provided which bolts the shaft to rotating outer core 22 and thus provides rotational force from outer core 22 to shaft 23.
(39) Hydraulic ram cylinders 37 may be sized to operate at approximately 50 percent of their continuous operating pressure when the pump is under full load conditions.
(40) Piston cylinder clusters 24, 25, manifold valve assemblies 26, 27 and piston assemblies 28, 29 may be designed and made in various manners familiar to those skilled in the art. For instance, gusseted flanges may be used to connect the piston connecting rods to the swash plate 32. Track runners may be employed to accommodate the maximum swash plate angle and act as torque stabilizers for the stationary outboard side of the piston assemblies. In order to maintain alignment of the pistons in their associated cylinder barrels, piston skirts are employed.
(41) An alternative embodiment for a variable displacement, axial pump suitable for this application is illustrated in
(42) More specifically,
(43) Pump 60 also comprises rotating swash plate pivot assembly 75 which includes a pair of pivoting swash plate subassemblies 70 and 71 at each end of shaft 61 inboard of each piston assembly 66, 67. Pivoting swash plate subassemblies 70 and 71 are connected to shaft 61 and are capable of pivoting with respect to the axis of shaft 61. Rotating swash plate pivot assembly 75 also comprises swash plate adjustment subassembly 76 which is connected to each pivoting swash plate subassembly 70, 71 and mounted so as to cause each swash plate subassembly 70, 71 to pivot according to the length of swash plate adjustment subassembly 76. As before, swash plate adjustment subassembly 76 comprises hydraulic ram cylinder 77 which connects to both pivoting swash plate subassemblies 70, 71. The length of swash plate adjustment subassembly 76 is varied by hydraulically varying the extension of hydraulic ram cylinder 77. Again as before, hydraulic ram cylinder 77 is double acting and thus can be extended or contracted via hydraulic control. A control system (again not shown) is employed to control the extension of the hydraulic ram cylinder and hence the length of swash plate adjustment subassembly 76.
(44) To better balance loading in the embodiment of
(45) The following examples are provided to illustrate certain aspects of the disclosure but should not be construed as limiting in any way.
EXAMPLES
(46) Estimated power generation capabilities were determined for a hydroelectric power system based on variable displacement, axial piston pumps of the disclosure and two possible waterwheel designs when used at Makaii Point in the Juskatla Narrows, on Graham Island of Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada. In this exercise, models were created and evaluated to determine the output capacity of the waterwheels, the flow capacity of the pumping system, the surface flow velocities in the Juskatla Narrows, and the required pumped water reservoir size and firm power capacity at the hydroelectric power plant.
(47) In summary, the mean stream flow in the Juskatla Narrows was determined to be about 1.6 m/s with speeds ranging from zero to 4 m/s. In a first example, the selected waterwheel design having a 5 m wheel diameter with 2 m wide blades was modeled to produce 3.8 kW in a stream flow of 1.6 m/s. When run through the full range of stream flows in the Juskatla Narrows, the system was estimated to produce a continuous, firm power output of 3.8 kW or more from the hydroelectric power system. In this example, it was assumed that an upper storage reservoir was elevated at about 250 m above sea level and that the hydro turbine was located at a point just above sea level.
(48) Calculations of the output power capacity of the waterwheel were based mainly on those presented by Muller et al. in Stream Wheels for Applications in Shallow and Deep Water; Muller, Gerald, S. Denchfield, R. Marth, B. Shelmerdine; 32nd IAHR Conference 2007, Venice, Italy; 01-6 Jul. 2007. According to Muller et al., the present waterwheel would be in a deep water situation where the stream bed is substantially deeper than the submerged depth of the blades and the stream velocity is smaller than critical velocity. The waterwheel's power output is mainly a function of the blade surface area in the water, the stream velocity, and the blade velocity. The forces acting on the blade are a combination of hydrostatic head differences and momentum exchange from the water to the blade. The following equations were adapted from Muller et al. And here, it was assumed that only one full blade was in the water at any time. The force F on the blade was determined by:
(49)
(50) Force F is a combination of the hydrostatic head difference (first term on left hand side) and the momentum exchange (second term on left hand side) where .sub.w is the water density, g is gravitational force, b is the width of the blades on the waterwheel. The blade or paddle depth into the water is given by d, and the water ramp-up height on the upstream portion of the blade is h.sub.1 and the drop in water on the downstream is h.sub.2. The free stream velocity is .sub.1 and the blade velocity is .sub.2.
(51) The ramp-up water surface on the upstream side of the paddle is given by:
(52)
(53) According to Muller the ratio of head difference was determined experimentally and is:
(54)
(55) The power output P is a function of force and paddle velocity and is given by:
P=F.sub.2
(56) From here the torque T from the waterwheel is calculated as:
T=Fr
(57) Using the equations above a power output curve can be drawn based on the blade velocity .sub.2 at a fixed flow velocity .sub.1. This power curve was evaluated experimentally in Muller et al. with a small (0.5 m diameter) waterwheel and compared to calculations using the above equations. The calculated power output results were about 85% (at maximum power out) of those in the experiment of Muller et al. The difference may be because of the assumption here that only one full blade was in the water at any time whereas in the Muller et al. experiment, multiple blades may have been in the water, which would increase the available power.
(58) The waterwheel considered in this first example was 5 m in diameter with a set of rectangular blades that were 2 m wide and equally spaced around the circumference of the waterwheel.
(59) Using the preceding equations, a theoretical output power curve was calculated as a function of blade velocity for this specific waterwheel for a given fixed stream velocity of 1.6 m/s. (This was the mean stream flow rate in Juskatla as discussed below.) Power output was corrected by a factor of 1.15 to account for the increased number of blades in the waterwheel. From these calculations, a maximum power output of about 3.8 kW is obtained when the blade speed is 0.7 to 0.8 m/s or at a ratio of about 0.44 to 0.5 times that of the stream velocity. In the Muller et al. experiment, that ratio was about 0.44. Thus, this specific waterwheel would be expected to produce 3.8 kW in a stream flow of 1.6 m/s, but the calculations suggest it can produce 15 kW at 2.5 m/s. The output from an exemplary axial piston pump and finally from the hydroelectric power system overall were then modeled assuming this waterwheel power output was available.
(60) The pump model was designed to simulate loading of the waterwheel under different stream speeds. As stream speed increases, causing increased power transmission via the water wheel, pump loading on the wheel is increased by increasing the swash plate angle. Output pressure is maintained, with the increase in power being used to increase pump flow. The model expressed changes in flow and head with respect to swash plate angle and available torque.
(61) The torque output of the waterwheel under varying stream speeds is converted to force acting through the swash by:
Torque(Nm)=Force(N)Swash plate radius(m)
(62) As there are two swash plates driven by the shaft, total force is divided by two to yield swash plate force per piston block. Swash plate radius is a function of the maximum allowable swash plate angle and the swept stroke of the cylinder. For purposes of this first example, a conventional maximum swash plate angle of 18 degrees was assumed.
(63) Swash plate diameter then is given by:
Swash plate diameter(m)=Cylinder swept stroke(m)sin 18.
(64) The rotating force acting through the swash plate was resolved into a reciprocating force using vectors. The swash plate was treated as an inclined plane. It was further assumed that there were no significant friction losses in the swash plate bearings.
(65) To further simplify the analysis, it was assumed that there would be a net positive suction head for all the cylinders on the intake stroke. In other words, it was assumed that no energy would be expended drawing water into the cylinders due to a positive head on the intake side (i.e. that the tail-race reservoir was elevated above the pump.) It was further assumed that at any given time in the cycle of a revolution, that half the cylinders would be on the intake cycle and the other half would be on the output cycle. Therefore, at any given time, half the number of cylinders will be utilizing the available pumping force. To account for the various dynamic hydraulic friction losses associated with one-way valves, restricted exit losses, and pipe friction losses, it was assumed here that a very conservative estimate for these dynamic friction losses would be a doubling of the maximum static head involved (i.e. here the maximum static head was taken to be 250 m, and thus dynamic friction losses would be equivalent to about 500 m).
(66) For this model, an axial pump similar to that shown in
(67) From this model, it was found that torque reaches a maximum of 45 kNm when the swash plate angle reaches it maximum of 18 degrees, which occurs at stream velocities above 3 m/s. Up to 3 m/s, the maximum available power from the hydropower pump is fully used. Above this limit, the waterwheel will spin at a higher rpm, pumping pumpwater at a higher rate, but the pump is not using the maximum available power from the waterwheel. (Again, providing for greater possible swash plate angles raises this limit and thus allows for an increase in efficiency at these greater stream velocities.)
(68) From the different stream velocities, power was then calculated using:
Power(W)=head(m)flow(kg/s)gravity(m/s.sup.2)turbine efficiency (%)
(69) The pressure head, however, varies depending on the stream velocity of the tidal flow. Using the present model, the pressure head varies at the turbine temporarily during periods of tidal slack. When the pump is operating, the pressure will rise to 500 m head at the turbine nozzle (taking into account dynamic friction losses as mentioned above). Some of the pumped water will go up to the upper reservoir and some will feed directly into the hydro plant. When the hydro plant is being fed only by the upper reservoir the water pressure will be lower, dropping to 250 m of head. For simplicity here, it was assumed that 50% of the water volume will feed the turbine directly and 50% will flow back from the upper reservoir, and that the average pressure that the nozzle experiences is midway between these extremes, i.e., 375 m total head. This was used to calculate power. A typical plant efficiency of 0.8 for the hydro turbine was also assumed since a significant portion of the pumped water goes directly into the hydro plant. With an output power from the waterwheel of approximately 3.8 kW at 1.6 m/s stream velocity, the flow available for the hydroelectric power plant is 0.62 l/s. So, using the preceding equation, power was calculated as:
Power=375 m0.62 liter(kg)/s9.8 m/s20.8=1.8 kW
(70) Therefore, the expected generated electrical power from the hydroelectric power system is 1.8 kW. This represents a hydroplant efficiency of about 48% (1.8/3.8 kW) at this stream velocity. A detailed table of parameters and values for the preceding models is provided in Table 1 below.
(71) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Theoretical system performance data versus water speed for 1st example Stream Paddle Useful Paddle velocity velocity Ratio power force Torque v1 v2 v2/v1 RPM dh1 dh2 kW kN kNm 0 0.00 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 0.04 0.44 0.2 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.2 0.09 0.44 0.3 0.002 0.001 0.01 0.08 0.16 0.3 0.13 0.44 0.5 0.004 0.002 0.02 0.18 0.37 0.4 0.18 0.44 0.7 0.007 0.004 0.06 0.32 0.66 0.5 0.22 0.44 0.8 0.010 0.007 0.11 0.50 1.03 0.6 0.26 0.44 1.0 0.015 0.010 0.19 0.72 1.48 0.7 0.31 0.44 1.2 0.020 0.013 0.30 0.98 2.02 0.8 0.35 0.44 1.3 0.026 0.018 0.45 1.29 2.65 0.9 0.40 0.44 1.5 0.033 0.022 0.65 1.63 3.37 1 0.44 0.44 1.7 0.041 0.027 0.89 2.02 4.17 1.1 0.48 0.44 1.8 0.050 0.033 1.19 2.46 5.07 1.2 0.53 0.44 2.0 0.059 0.039 1.55 2.94 6.06 1.3 0.57 0.44 2.2 0.070 0.046 1.98 3.47 7.15 L4 0.62 0.44 2.4 0.081 0.054 2.49 4.04 8.34 1.5 0.66 0.44 2.5 0.093 0.062 3.08 4.67 9.63 1.6 0.70 0.44 2.7 0.105 0.070 3.76 5.34 11.02 1.7 0.75 0.44 2.9 0.119 0.079 4.54 6.07 12.52 1.8 0.79 0.44 3.0 0.133 0.089 5.42 6.85 14.13 1.9 0.84 0.44 3.2 0.149 0.099 6.42 7.69 15.85 2 0.88 0.44 3.4 0.165 0.110 7.55 8.58 17.69 2.1 0.92 0.44 3.5 0.181 0.121 8.81 9.53 19.66 2.2 0.97 0.44 3.7 0.199 0.133 1021 10.54 21.75 2.3 1.01 0.44 3.9 0.218 0.145 11.76 11.62 23.97 2.4 1.06 0.44 4.0 0.237 0.158 13.48 12.76 26.32 2.5 1.10 0.44 4.2 0.257 0.171 15.37 13.97 28.81 2.6 1.14 0.44 4.4 0.278 0.185 17A4 15.25 31.45 2.7 1.19 0.44 4.5 0.300 0.200 19.72 16.60 34.24 2.8 1.23 0.44 4.7 0.323 0.215 22.21 18.03 37.18 2.9 1.28 0.44 4.9 0.346 0.231 24.92 19.53 40.28 3 1.32 0.44 5.0 0.370 0.247 27.87 21.11 43.55 3.1 1.43 0.46 5.5 0.386 0.257 31.04 21.70 44.75 3.2 1.58 0.49 6.0 0.396 0.264 34.19 21.70 44.75 3.3 1.72 0.52 6.6 0.405 0.270 37.29 21.70 44.75 3.4 1.86 0.55 7.1 0.413 0.276 40.34 21.70 44.75 3.5 2.00 0.57 7.6 0.421 0.281 43.34 21.70 44.75 3.6 2.13 0.59 8.2 0.429 0.286 46.30 21.70 44.75 3.7 2.27 0.61 8.7 0.436 0.291 49.22 21.70 44.75 3.8 2.40 0.63 9.2 0.443 0.295 52.11 21.70 44.75 3.9 2.53 0.65 9.7 0.449 0.299 54.96 21.70 44.75 4 2.66 0.67 10.2 0.455 0.303 57.79 21.70 44.75 Tang. force/ Swash Swept Force Hydro- swash plate volume/ needed/ Maximum Maximum power plate angle cylinder swash flow flow out KN degrees m{circumflex over ()}3 kN m{circumflex over ()}3/sec cu. ft/sec kW Efficiency 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.00000 0.0000 0.0 0.02 3.81E06 0.0 0.00000 0.0000 0.00 0.58 0.2 0.08 1.52E05 0.2 0.00000 0.0000 0.00 0.58 0.4 0.16 3.057E05 0.4 0.00000 0.0001 0.01 0.51 0.7 0.28 5.33E05 0.7 0.00001 0.0003 0.03 0.50 1.1 0.44 8.38E05 1.1 0.00002 0.0007 0.06 0.50 1.5 0.60 0.000114 1.5 0.00003 0.0011 0.09 0.48 2.1 0.83 0.000160 2.1 0.00005 0.0018 0.15 0.49 2.7 1.07 0.000206 2.7 0.00007 0.0026 0.22 0.48 3.5 1.39 0.000267 3.5 0.00011 0.0038 0.32 0.49 4.3 1.71 0.000327 4.3 0.00015 0.0052 0.43 0.49 5.2 2.07 0.000396 5.2 0.00020 0.0069 0.57 0.48 6.2 2.46 0.000472 6.2 0.00025 0.0090 0.75 0.48 7.4 2.94 0.000563 7.4 0.00033 0.0116 0.97 0.49 8.6 3.42 0.000654 8.6 0.00041 0.0145 1.21 0.49 9.9 3.93 0.000753 9.9 0.00051 0.0179 1.49 0.48 11.3 4.49 0.000859 11.3 0.00062 0.0217 1.81 0.48 12.9 5.12 0.000980 12.9 0.00075 0.0264 2.20 0.48 14.6 5.79 0.001108 14.6 0.00089 0.0316 2.63 0.48 16.3 6.46 0.001236 16.3 0.00105 0.0372 3.10 0.48 18.2 7.21 0.001379 18.2 0.00124 0.0436 3.64 0.48 20.2 8.00 0.001528 20.2 0.00144 0.0508 4.23 0.48 22.4 8.86 0.00169 22.4 0.00167 0.0589 4.91 0.48 24.7 9.76 0.001862 24.7 0.00192 0.0678 5.65 0.48 27.1 10.70 0.002039 27.1 0.00219 0.0774 6.45 0.48 29.7 11.71 0.002229 29.7 0.00250 0.0882 7.35 0.48 32.4 12.76 0.002425 32.4 0.00283 0.0998 8.32 0.48 35.3 13.88 0.002633 35.3 0.00319 0.1125 9.38 0.48 38.3 15.03 0.00285 38.3 0.00357 0.1261 10.51 0.47 41.5 16.25 0.003072 41.5 0.00399 0.1410 11.75 0.47 44.9 17.53 0.003308 44.9 0.00445 0.1570 13.09 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00494 0.1746 14.55 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00545 0.1923 16.03 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00594 0.2097 17.48 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00642 0.2269 18.91 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00690 0.2437 20.31 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00737 0.2604 21.70 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00784 0.2768 23.07 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00830 0.2930 24.42 0.47 46.1 18.00 0.00339 46.1 0.00875 0.3091 25.76 0.47 46.1 0.00339 46.1 0.00920 0.3250 27.09 0.47
(72) The mean power output of the model over the full range of stream flow velocities however should vary significantly from the above calculations. Stream velocities and mean power output from the hydroelectric power system were thus estimated as follows.
(73) The flow rate of water going in and out of the Juskatla Inlet was determined based on hourly tide data (provided by the Canadian Hydrographic Service at Fisheries and Oceans Canada). Mass conservation was assumed and flow coming in from the surrounding watershed was assumed to be insignificant compared to the tidal flow. The vertical velocity of the Juskatla inlet water surface was calculated by taking the difference in tide height between each hour and dividing by the interval time. The area of the inlet was estimated at about 35 km.sup.2. The cross-sectional area of the Juskatla Narrows was given as 720 m.sup.2 (as per Hart, Stephen, 2008, Haida Gwaii/Queen Charlotte Islands Demonstration Tidal Power Plant Feasibility Study. A Hatch Energy report for British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources). The area-averaged flow velocity in the Narrows was calculated and adjusted using a constant of 0.83 (determined by matching the calculated flow to that measured in practice as at Jun. 9, 2011).
(74) From the determined frequency distribution of flow velocities, the most frequently occurring water surface velocity was 1.3 m/s and the average stream flow velocity was 1.6 m/s. The estimated flow velocity ranged from 0 to 4 m/s.
(75) Using the preceding output calculations, these tidal velocities were then converted into pumped flow rate. The hourly pumped volumes of pumpwater were summed up into daily volume flows. The average flow was found to be 0.0013 m.sup.3/s and the daily averaged pumped volume was 111 m.sup.3 to the upper reservoir at 250 m static head. This is the average pumped flow over the whole range of stream velocities (as opposed to the pumped flow of 0.62 l/s at 1.6 m/s). The pressure head, however, varies according to the phase of tidal flow. When the pump is operating the pressure will rise to 500 m head at the hydro turbine nozzle. As mentioned, the pressure head varies at the turbine temporarily during periods of tidal slack. When the turbine is being operated by the reservoir only, the water pressure drops to 250 m. It was assumed that the average pressure that the nozzle experiences is midway between these extremes or 375 m total head. A typical plant efficiency of 0.8 for the hydro turbine was assumed.
(76) This time then:
Power=375 m1.3 liter(kg)/s9.81 m/s.sup.20.8
And therefore potential electrical power available for generation at the hydro site will be 3.8 kW using the above hydropower pump.
(77) Finally, an estimate for the required reservoir size was made. In the preceding, the pumped flow ranged from 44 m.sup.3 to 220 m.sup.3 per day for the example pump in an average stream flow of 1.6 m/s. The upper reservoir was taken to start at about 800 m.sup.3 of water. It was determined that a reservoir holding 1100 m.sup.3 of water would be required to accommodate the system needs over the course of a year (just becoming completely empty in October and reaching its maximum in January). No consideration was given to water evaporation or rain accumulation in this estimate.
(78) The preceding model was based on very conservative assumptions for friction losses and pump capability. In a second example, an axial pump with greater maximum swash plate angle and double-acting cylinder design similar to that shown in
(79) Here, the waterwheel design considered was the same as in the previous example except that the dip depth of the blade was set to 0.800 m which was based on a ratio of blade depth to wheel diameter of 0.2. Also, an angle of 53.1 between blades and hence a minimum number of 7 blades (6.8 rounded up) was assumed.
(80) This time, a maximum swash plate angle of 30 degrees was assumed. And further, 8 double-acting piston cylinders were assumed (i.e. 4 at each end) with the following characteristics: swept cylinder stroke=37.5 cm, cylinder bore diameter=20.3 cm, calculated piston CSA=0.032 m.sup.2, and swept volume=0.0122 m.sup.3.
(81) And finally, more likely realistic friction losses were assumed such that a required head of only 286 m was assumed to obtain the same gross head of 250 m.
(82) A detailed table of parameters and values for this second example is provided in Table 2 below.
(83) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Theoretical system performance data versus water speed for 2nd example Stream Paddle Useful Paddle velocity velocity Ratio power force Torque v1 v2 v2/v1 RPM dh1 dh2 kW kN kNm 0 0.00 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1 0.04 0.44 0.2 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.2 0.09 0.44 0.3 0.002 0.001 0.01 0.09 0.18 0.3 0.13 0.44 0.5 0.004 0.002 0.03 0.20 0.41 0.4 0.18 0.44 0.7 0.007 0.004 0.06 0.36 0.73 0.5 0.22 0.44 0.8 0.010 0.007 0.13 0.57 1.14 0.6 0.26 0.44 1.0 0.015 0.010 0.22 0.82 1.64 0.7 0.31 0.44 1.2 0.020 0.013 0.35 1.12 2.24 0.8 0.35 0.44 1.3 0.026 0.018 0.52 1.47 2.93 0.9 0.40 0.44 1.5 0.033 0.022 0.74 1.86 3.73 1 0.44 0.44 1.7 0.041 0.027 1.02 2.31 4.61 1.1 0.48 0.44 1.8 0.050 0.033 1.36 2.80 5.60 L2 0.53 0.44 2.0 0.059 0.039 1.77 3.35 6.70 1.3 0.57 0.44 2.2 0.070 0.046 2.26 3.95 7.89 1.4 0.62 0.44 2.4 0.081 0.054 2.83 4.60 9.20 1.5 0.66 0.44 2.5 0.093 0.062 3.50 5.30 10.61 1.6 0.70 0.44 2.7 0.105 0.070 4.27 6.07 12.13 1.7 0.75 0.44 2.9 0.119 0.079 5.15 6.89 13.78 1.8 0.79 0.44 3.0 0.133 0.089 6.15 7.77 15.53 1.9 0.84 0.44 3.2 0.149 0.099 7.28 8.71 17.42 2 0.88 0.44 3.4 0.165 0.110 8.55 9.71 19.42 2.1 0.92 0.44 3.5 0.181 0.121 9.96 10.78 21.56 2.2 0.97 0.44 3.7 0.199 0.133 11.53 11.92 23.83 2.3 1.01 0.44 3.9 0.218 0.145 13.28 13.12 26.24 2.4 1.06 0.44 4.0 0.237 0.158 15.20 14.39 28.79 2.5 1.10 0.44 4.2 0.257 0.171 17.32 15.74 31.48 2.6 1.14 0.44 4.4 0.278 0.185 19.64 17.16 34.33 2.7 1.19 0.44 4.5 0.300 0.200 22.18 18.67 37.33 2.8 1.23 0.44 4.7 0.323 0.215 24.95 20.25 40.50 2.9 1.28 0.44 4.9 0.346 0.231 27.96 21.91 43.83 3 1.32 0.44 5.0 0.370 0.247 31.24 23.66 47.33 3.1 1.36 0.44 5.2 0.395 0.264 34.788 25.50 51.01 3.2 1.41 0.44 5.4 0.421 0.281 38.63 27.44 54.87 3.3 1.45 0.44 5.5 0.448 0.299 42.78 29.46 58.92 3.4 1.50 0.44 5.7 0.476 0.317 47.25 31.59 63.17 3.5 1.54 0.44 5.9 0.504 0.336 52.07 33.81 67.63 3.6 1.58 0.44 6.1 0.533 0.355 57.25 36.14 72.29 3.7 1.63 0.44 6.2 0.563 0.375 62.81 38.58 77.16 3.8 1.67 0.44 6.4 0.594 0.396 68.77 41.13 82.26 3.9 1.72 0.44 6.6 0.626 0.417 75.15 43.80 87.59 4 1.76 0.44 6.7 0.658 0.439 81.98 46.58 93.16 Tang. force/ Swash Force Swept Hydro- swash plate needed/ volume/ Maximum Maximum power plate angle swash cylinder flow flow out KN degrees kN m{circumflex over ()}3 m{circumflex over ()}3/sec cu. ft/sec kW Efficiency 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00000 0.00000 0.0000 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.00001 0.00000 0.0000 0.00 0.57 0.2 0.06 0.2 0.00003 0.00000 0.0001 0.00 0.57 0.4 0.13 0.4 0.00007 0.00001 0.0003 0.02 0.57 0.7 0.24 0.7 0.00013 0.00002 0.0007 0.04 0.57 1.2 0.37 1.2 0.00020 0.00004 0.0013 0.07 0.57 1.7 0.53 1.7 0.00029 0.00006 0.0022 0.12 0.57 2.3 0.73 2.3 0.00040 0.00010 0.0035 0.20 0.57 3.0 0.95 3.0 0.00052 0.00015 0.0053 0.29 0.57 3.8 1.21 3.8 0.00066 0.00021 0.0076 0.42 0.57 4.8 1.50 4.8 0.00082 0.00029 0.0104 0.58 0.57 5.8 1.82 5.8 0.00100 0.00039 0.0139 0.77 0.57 6.9 2.17 6.9 0.00119 0.00051 0.0181 1.01 0.57 8.1 2.56 8.1 0.00141 0.00066 0.0231 1.29 0.57 9.5 2.98 9.5 0.00164 0.00082 0.0290 1.61 0.57 10.9 3.44 10.9 0.00189 0.00102 0.0359 1.99 0.57 12.5 3.93 12.5 0.00216 0.00124 0.0437 2.43 0.57 14.2 4.46 14.2 0.00245 0.00149 0.0527 2.93 0.57 16.0 5.03 16.0 0.00276 0.00178 0.0629 3.49 0.57 17.9 5.63 17.9 0.00309 0.00211 0.0743 4.13 0.57 20.0 6.28 20.0 0.00344 0.00247 0.0872 4.84 0.57 22.2 6.96 22.2 0.00382 0.00287 0.1015 5.64 0.57 24.5 7.69 24.5 0.00421 0.00332 0.1173 6.52 0.57 27.0 8.45 27.0 0.00463 0.00382 0.1348 7.49 0.56 29.6 9.26 29.6 0.00507 0.00436 0.1539 8.55 0.56 32.4 10.11 32.4 0.00553 0.00495 0.1749 9.72 0.56 35.4 11.00 35.4 0.00601 0.00560 0.1978 10.99 0.56 38.4 11.94 38.4 0.00651 0.00631 0.2226 12.37 0.56 41.7 12.92 41.7 0.00704 0.00707 0.2495 13.86 0.56 45.1 13.94 45.1 0.00758 0.00789 0.2785 15.47 0.55 48.7 15.00 48.7 0.00815 0.00877 0.3096 17.20 0.55 52.5 16.11 52.5 0.00874 0.00971 0.3430 19.06 0.55 56.5 17.26 56.5 0.00934 0.01072 0.3786 21.03 0.54 60.7 18.45 60.7 0.00997 0.01179 0.4164 23.14 0.54 65.1 19.68 65.1 0.01061 0.01293 0.4566 25.37 0.54 69.6 20.96 69.6 0.01126 0.01413 0.4990 27.73 0.53 74.4 22.26 74.4 0.01193 0.01540 0.5437 30.21 0.53 79.5 23.60 79.5 0.01261 0.01673 0.5906 32.82 0.52 84.7 24.98 84.7 0.01330 0.01812 0.6397 35.55 0.52 90.2 26.38 90.2 0.01399 0.01957 0.6909 38.39 0.51 95.9 27.81 95.9 0.01469 0.02107 0.7441 41.34 0.50
(84) The calculated power out is markedly greater for this second example and illustrates the potential for improvement given appropriate waterwheel and pump designs and if friction losses are kept reasonably low.
(85) All of the above mentioned U.S. patents and applications, foreign patents and applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
(86) While particular embodiments, aspects, and applications of the present disclosure have been shown and described, it is understood by those skilled in the art, that the disclosure is not limited thereto. For instance, the detailed description discussed a hydroelectric system comprising a single hydropower pump mounted on a floating barge. Depending on needs and site limitations, multiple hydropower pumps may be employed in a system. Further, it may be unnecessary in practice to maintain the hydropower pump at a constant height with respect to the moving stream and thus a floating mount may be unnecessary. Further still, while an axial piston pump like that described above offers certain advantages, it is possible to use other variable displacement piston pumps. For instance, a configuration using a vertical axis waterwheel or turbine and a variable displacement, radial piston pump may be considered. In such an embodiment, an advantage is that more diameter is available above the waterline. And further still, with regards to the aforementioned variable displacement, axial piston pump, the swash plate adjustment subassembly may be pneumatically operated instead of hydraulically operated and may be adjusted by means of a gear drive, machine screw or other suitable mechanisms. It may also prove useful to consider employing remote manifold and valve assemblies connected to outboard heads of the fixed outboard piston cylinder clusters.
(87) Thus, many other modifications or alterations may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. The disclosure should therefore be construed in accordance with the following claims.