Modular vehicle barrier
10370808 ยท 2019-08-06
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
E01F13/12
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E01F13/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E01F13/02
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
An exemplary modular vehicle barrier includes a rigid, generally L-shaped frame having a base and an upright portion. The base including two or more joists spaced apart and extending orthogonal to a foot plate, wherein the foot plate is attached to a bottom surface at a front end of the two or more joists, the upright portion configured in a ladder arrangement having spaced apart vertical posts secured at bottom ends to a bottom beam and at top ends to a top beam, wherein the bottom beam is attached to a top surface at a back end of the two or more joists, and a wedge point formed the bottom surface of the second end of the two or more joists.
Claims
1. A modular vehicle barrier, comprising: a rigid, generally L-shaped frame having a base and an upright portion; the base including two or more joists spaced apart and extending orthogonal to a foot plate, wherein the foot plate is attached to a bottom surface at a front end of the two or more joists; the upright portion configured in a ladder arrangement having spaced apart vertical posts secured at bottom ends to a bottom beam and at top ends to a top beam, wherein the bottom beam is attached to a top surface at a back end of the two or more joists; and a wedge point formed at the bottom surface of the back end of the two or more joists.
2. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the upright portion is spaced forward of the wedge point toward the front end.
3. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein L-shaped frame has a lateral length of approximately 20 feet.
4. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the top beam is attached to top surfaces of the vertical posts whereby the top beam and the vertical posts extend in the same vertical plane.
5. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the top beam is secured to a front face of the vertical posts such that the top beam and the vertical posts are aligned in different vertical planes.
6. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the foot plate elevates the front end of the two or more joists relative to the back end of the two or more joists.
7. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the two or more joists, the vertical posts, the top beam, and the bottom beam are constructed of hollow tubular members and/or I-beams.
8. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the generally L-shaped frame is configured to achieve a crash rating in accordance with ASTM F2656.
9. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 8, wherein the upright portion is spaced forward of the wedge point toward the front end.
10. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the generally L-shaped frame is crash-rated M30-P2 in accordance with ASTM F2656.
11. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 10, wherein the upright portion is spaced forward of the wedge point toward the front end.
12. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the top beam is attached to top surfaces of the vertical posts whereby the top beam and the vertical posts extend in the same vertical plane; and the foot plate elevates the front end of the two or more joists relative to the back end of the two or more joists.
13. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 12, wherein the two or more joists, the vertical posts, the top beam, and the bottom beam are constructed of hollow tubular members and/or I-beams.
14. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the top beam is secured to a front face of the vertical posts such that the top beam and the vertical posts are aligned in different vertical planes; and the foot plate elevates the front end of the two or more joists relative to the back end of the two or more joists.
15. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 14, wherein the two or more joists, the vertical posts, the top beam, and the bottom beam are constructed of hollow tubular members and/or I-beams.
16. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 1, wherein the top beam is constructed of a hollow tubular member and further comprising: an extension arm that is slidably disposed in a first end of the top beam and configured to mate with an adjacent L-shaped frame; and the upright portion comprising a connector located on a second end opposite the first end, the connector adapted to attach to an extension arm and comprising vertically spaced apart plates.
17. The modular vehicle barrier of claim 16, wherein the foot plate elevates the front end of the two or more joists relative to the back end of the two or more joists; and the top beam and the vertical posts are aligned in a same vertical plane or the top beam and the vertical posts are aligned in different vertical planes.
18. A method comprising: positioning a modular vehicle barrier (MVB) on a ground surface, the MVB comprising a rigid, generally L-shaped frame having a base positioned on the ground and an upright portion, the base including two or more joists spaced apart and extending orthogonal to a foot plate, wherein the foot plate is attached to a bottom surface at a front end of the two or more joists, the upright portion configured in a ladder arrangement having spaced apart vertical posts secured at bottom ends to a bottom beam and at top ends to a top beam, wherein the bottom beam is attached to a top surface at a back end of the two or more joists, and a wedge point formed at the bottom surface of the back end of the two or more joists.
19. The method of claim 18, further comprising crashing a motor vehicle traveling in a direction from the front end to the back end into the upper portion; and stopping the vehicle within less than about 23 feet of the top beam to achieve a crash rating in accordance with ASTM F2656.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the motor vehicle was approximately 15,000 pounds and traveling at approximately 30 miles per hour when it impacts the upper portion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The disclosure is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying figures. It is emphasized that, in accordance with standard practice in the industry, various features are not drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion. As will be understood by those skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure, elements and arrangements of the various figures can be used together and in configurations not specifically illustrated without departing from the scope of this disclosure.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(14) It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features of various illustrative embodiments. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. For example, a figure may illustrate an exemplary embodiment with multiple features or combinations of features that are not required in one or more other embodiments and thus a figure may disclose one or more embodiments that have fewer features or a different combination of features than the illustrated embodiment. Embodiments may include some but not all the features illustrated in a figure and some embodiments may combine features illustrated in one figure with features illustrated in another figure. Therefore, combinations of features disclosed in the following detailed description may not be necessary to practice the teachings in the broadest sense and are instead merely to describe particularly representative examples. In addition, the disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
(15) Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, can, might, may, e.g., and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include such elements or features.
(16) In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as inboard, outboard, above, below, upper, lower, or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction. As used herein, the terms connect, connection, connected, in connection with, and connecting may be used to mean in direct connection with or in connection with via one or more elements. Similarly, the terms couple, coupling, and coupled may be used to mean directly coupled or coupled via one or more elements.
(17) Often times it is desirable to put up temporary passive vehicle anti-ram barriers at events (e.g., sporting events, concerts, festivals, etc.). Some public events can be quite large, covering a lot of acreage. Thus, an amount of temporary barrier or fencing used can be quite large. Temporary barriers that provide protection from vehicle impacts and other forces (e.g., pushing by a crowd of people) that might move or alter the positioning of temporary barriers can be heavy, large, and difficult to transport to the event and to setup at the event. A modular vehicle barrier is disclosed herein that can withstand vehicle impacts and allows for a reduction in transportation and setup costs. Transportation costs can be reduced by managing a weight of the modular vehicle barrier and utilizing an ability of the modular vehicle barrier to efficiently stack to maximize a number of the modular vehicle barrier that may be transported in a given space without exceeding transportation restrictions (e.g., highway weight restrictions). Setup costs can be reduced by reducing the weight of the modular vehicle barrier, which makes it easier to handle the modular vehicle barrier, and thus reduces labor costs to set up the modular vehicle barrier.
(18) In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, the portable gate assemblies are configured to provide a requisite stopping capability in the event that a motor vehicle, such as a 15,000 pounds (6.8 metric tons) medium-duty truck, crashes into the portable gate. In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, a requisite stopping capability will be in accordance with standards established for example by ASTM F-2656, which identifies impact conditions including the vehicle weight, impact velocity, and penetration distance. With reference to a medium-duty truck, having a weight of about 15,000 lb. (6,800 kg), the speed ratings include M30 for traveling at 28.0 to 37.9 miles per hour (mph), M40 traveling at 38.0 to 46.9 mph, and M50 traveling at 47.0 mph and above. The penetration ratings include P1 for less than or equal to 1 meter (3.3 ft); P2 for 1.10 to 7 m (3.31 to 23.0 ft); and P3 for 7.01 to 30 m (23.1 to 98.4 ft). For example, an ASTM F2656 crash-rated M50-P1 barrier is designed to stop a medium duty truck traveling 50 mph with a penetration distance of 3.3 feet or less.
(19) In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M30 speed rating with a P1 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M30 speed rating with a P2 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve a M30 speed rating with a P3 penetration rating.
(20) In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M40 speed rating with a P1 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M40 speed rating with a P2 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M40 speed rating with a P3 penetration rating.
(21) In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M50 speed rating with a P1 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M50 speed rating with a P2 penetration rating. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the modular vehicle barrier is configured to achieve an M50 speed rating with a P3 penetration rating.
(22) Some embodiments may be configured to achieve similar speed and penetration ratings for impact vehicles such as cars having a weight up to about 2,430 lb. (1,100 kg) (e.g., C40, C50, C60) and heavy goods vehicles having a weight of about 65,000 lbs (29,500 kg) (e.g., H30, H40, H50).
(23)
(24) MVB 10 is a rigid, generally L-shaped framework having a base 12 and an upright portion 14 configured to sit directly on a ground surface 7, e.g., grade, without being anchored to the ground to provide crash barrier protection. In an exemplary embodiment, upright portion 14 is configured to extend perpendicular to grade 7 and offset from perpendicular relative to base 12, see, e.g.,
(25) Base 12 includes a laterally extending foot plate 16 and two or more base joists 18 spaced apart and orthogonal to foot plate 16. Base joists 18 are linear members, e.g., I-beams, hollow tubular steel, extending from a front end 20 to a back end 22. Foot plate 16 is secured, e.g. by welding, to the bottom surface 24 of joists 18 at front end 20. Upright portion 14 is secured, e.g. by welding, to the top surface 26 of joists 18 at back end 22. In use, upright portion 14 separates the protected side 28 from the attack side 30 with front end 20 facing away from the protected side 28. Protected side 28 is associated with the area to be protected from approaching motor vehicles and attack side 30 is the side from which the vehicles are approaching protected side 28.
(26) Foot plate 16 does not extend from front end 20 to back end 22 of joists 18. For example, in
(27) MVB 10 has a wedge point 32 at bottom surface 24 of back end 22, which is configured to dig into ground surface 7 as MVB 10 rolls underneath an attacking vehicle. Wedge point 32 is positioned behind upper portion 14 a distance 54 as shown in particular in
(28) Upper portion 14 is configured in a ladder arrangement having spaced apart vertical posts 34 secured at their opposing ends to laterally extending bottom beam 36 and top beam 38. Bottom beam 36 is secured, e.g., by welding, to the bottom end 40 of posts 34 and aligned in the same vertical plane as vertical posts 34. Top beam 38 is secured, e.g., by welding, to the top end 42 of posts 34. In
(29) The exemplary embodiment illustrated in
(30) A single MVB unit 5 according to the modular vehicle barrier 10 illustrated in
(31) The result of the interaction between the test vehicle and modular vehicle barrier 10 was that the test vehicle's forward motion was arrested by the modular vehicle barrier. At initial impact the test vehicle's engine cowl made contact with upright portion 14 of modular vehicle barrier 10. As the test vehicle continued to move forward, the entire modular vehicle barrier 10 rolled forward underneath the test vehicle's front wheels as the bottom of modular vehicle barrier 10 dug into the road surface 7. At approximately 90 degrees of rotation of modular vehicle barrier 10, the test vehicle was propelled upwards and forwards as the terminal end of the base of modular vehicle barrier 10 contacted the undercarriage of the test vehicle. At this point in the event the test vehicle's engine cowl became detached from the test vehicle and the test vehicle's cab rotated slightly forward. As the test vehicle and the modular vehicle barrier continued to move forward, the front of the test vehicle came to rest on top of the modular vehicle barrier and they both continued to move forward together until they both came to a stop at a point between the P1 and P2 penetration lines, thus resulting in the P2 rating.
(32)
(33)
(34) Upper portion 14 is configured in a ladder arrangement having spaced apart vertical posts 34 secured at their opposing ends to laterally extending bottom beam 36 and top beam 38. Bottom beam 36 is secured, e.g., by welding, to the bottom end 40 of posts 34 and aligned in the same vertical plane as vertical posts 34. Top beam 38 is secured, e.g., by welding, to a front surface 34a of post 34 proximate top end 42 and is positioned in a different vertical plane from posts 34 and bottom beam 36. Top surface 42a of vertical posts 34 may be cut at a non-right angle as illustrated for example in
(35) In an exemplary embodiment described with reference to
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41) The term approximately is defined as largely but not necessarily wholly what is specified (and includes what is specified; e.g., approximately 90 degrees includes 90 degrees and approximately parallel includes parallel), as understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art. In any disclosed embodiment, the terms substantially, approximately, generally, and about may be substituted with within [a percentage] of what is specified, where the percentage may include for example 0.1, 1, and 5 percent as may be recognized by a person skilled in the art.
(42) The foregoing outlines features of several embodiments so that those skilled in the art may better understand the aspects of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they may readily use the disclosure as a basis for designing or modifying other processes and structures for carrying out the same purposes and/or achieving the same advantages of the embodiments introduced herein. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the disclosure and that they may make various changes, substitutions, and alterations herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. The scope of the invention should be determined only by the language of the claims that follow. The term comprising within the claims is intended to mean including at least such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. The terms a, an and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.