Shape memory polymer, preparation method therefor, and use thereof

Abstract

The present invention relates to the field of shape memory materials. Specifically, a shape memory polymer, a preparation method therefor, and use thereof are provided. The shape memory polymer is formed by polymerizing methyl ally polyethenoxy ether and 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate. The synthesis steps of the shape memory polymer are simplified, the preparation method is simple, and the production cost is low. In addition, the shape memory polymer prepared in the present invention has excellent shape memory performance and high hydrophilicity and biocompatibility, and is suitable for preparing biomedical materials in the field of biomedical science.

Claims

1. A shape memory polymer formed by polymerizing methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether and 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, having a structure represented by Formula I: ##STR00003##

2. The shape memory polymer according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of the raw materials methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether to 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate is 8:2-2:8.

3. The shape memory polymer according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether to 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate in the polymer is 8:2-2:8.

4. The shape memory polymer according to claim 1, wherein the shape memory polymer has a molecular weight of 10000-100000.

5. A method for preparing the shape memory polymer according to claim 1, comprising: adding methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, water and an initiator, under the protection of a protective gas, reacting at 50-80 C. for 8-24 hrs with stirring, and drying, to obtain the shape memory polymer.

6. The preparation method according to claim 5, wherein the protective gas is nitrogen; and the water is added in an amount of 2-3 times of the total weight of the methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether and the 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate.

7. The preparation method according to claim 5, wherein the initiator is ammonium persulfate, and used in an amount of 5-10 mM.

8. The preparation method according to claim 5, wherein the reaction is stirred at 60 C. for 10 hrs.

9. The preparation method according to claim 5, wherein the drying is done through a process comprising: adjusting the mass fraction of the polymer in the solution to 10-30% after reaction, then pouring the solution into a mold, drying for 12-24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 80-100 C., and then drying for 12-24 hrs under vacuum, to obtain the shape memory polymer.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG20 according to Example 1;

(2) FIG. 2 is a dual-shape-memory cyclic curve of Sample TPEG20 according to Example 1;

(3) FIG. 3 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG30 according to Example 2;

(4) FIG. 4 is a dual-shape-memory cyclic curve of Sample TPEG30 according to Example 2;

(5) FIG. 5 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG40 according to Example 3;

(6) FIG. 6 is a dual-shape-memory cyclic curve of Sample TPEG40 according to Example 3;

(7) FIG. 7 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG50 according to Example 4;

(8) FIG. 8 is an NMR spectrum of Sample TPEG50 according to Example 4;

(9) FIG. 9 is a dual-shape-memory cyclic curve of Sample TPEG50 according to Example 4;

(10) FIG. 10 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG60 according to Example 5;

(11) FIG. 11 is an IR spectrum of Sample TPEG80 according to Example 6;

(12) FIG. 12 shows a contact angle tested for Sample TPEG80 according to Example 6;

(13) FIG. 13 shows dynamic mechanical property curves of the samples according to Examples 1-5; and

(14) FIG. 14 shows DSC curves of the samples according to Examples 1-6.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(15) The present invention is further explained below in connection with specific embodiments; however, the present invention is not limited thereto in any way.

(16) In the following examples, the shape fixity ratio and the shape recovery ratio are tested by using a DMA cyclic deformation test method in force control mode. First, a sample strip is fixed in a drawing die of a DMA apparatus and heated to a temperature of 90 C., and the force is adjusted to increase from 0 to 1.0 N, so that the sample strip undergoes deformation. When the deformation exceeds 80%, a tensile deformation E1 is obtained. Then, the temperature is rapidly dropped to 20 C., to fix the deformation for 10 min. Then, the force is adjusted to reduce to 0 N, to obtain a fixed deformation E2. Finally, the temperature is raised to 90 C. again, and maintained for about 40 min. The deformation is recovered. A recovered deformation E3 is obtained. The operations are repeated, to obtain a cyclic deformation curve. Therefore, the shape fixity ratio (F) and the shape recovery ratio (R) of each cycle can be calculated using the following formulas:
F=E2/E1*100%
R=(E2E3)/E2*100%

(17) In the following examples, the contact angle is tested by a static contact angle test method, specifically as described in (Shaojun Chen, *Funian Mo, Yan Yang, Florian J. Stadler, Shiguo Chen, Haipeng Yang, Zaochuan Ge, Development of zwitterionic polyurethanes with multi-shape memory effects and self-healing properties, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 2924.).

Example 1

(18) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 20 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 80 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 60 C. for 10 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 20%, then poured into a mold, dried for 24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 80 C., and then dried for 24 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 20 (where 20 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 20% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(19) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum of TPEG 20, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 20, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 20, as shown in FIG. 1. The 1H-NMR spectrum of TPEG 20 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 20.

(20) The prepared sample TPEG20 exhibits a good dual shape memory performance. As shown in FIG. 2, the initial shape fixity ratio is about 98.71%, and the primary shape recovery ratio is about 71.11%; the secondary shape fixity ratio is about 98.72%, and the secondary shape recovery ratio is about 62.90%; and the tertiary shape fixity ratio is about 99.34%, and the tertiary shape recovery ratio is about 56.92%.

Example 2

(21) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 30 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 70 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 80 C. for 10 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 30%, then poured into a mold, dried for 12 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 80 C., and then dried for 24 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 30 (where 30 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 30% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(22) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum of TPEG 30, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 30, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 30, as shown in FIG. 3. The 1H-NMR spectrum of TPEG 30 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 30.

(23) The prepared sample TPEG30 exhibits a good dual shape memory performance. As shown in FIG. 4, the initial shape fixity ratio is about 98.29%, and the primary shape recovery ratio is about 87.80%; the secondary shape fixity ratio is about 98.03%, and the secondary shape recovery ratio is about 91.92%; and the tertiary shape fixity ratio is about 97.74%, and the tertiary shape recovery ratio is about 73.51%.

Example 3

(24) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 40 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 60 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 50 C. for 24 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 10%, then poured into a mold, dried for 24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 100 C., and then dried for 12 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 40 (where 40 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 40% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(25) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum of TPEG 40, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 40, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 40, as shown in FIG. 5. The 1H-NMR spectrum of TPEG 40 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 40.

(26) The prepared sample TPEG40 exhibits a good shape memory performance. As shown in FIG. 6, the initial shape fixity ratio is about 98.81%, and the primary shape recovery ratio is about 90.68%; the secondary shape fixity ratio is about 98.81%, and the secondary shape recovery ratio is about 86.05%; and the tertiary shape fixity ratio is about 97.78%, and the tertiary shape recovery ratio is about 84.27%.

Example 4

(27) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 50 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 50 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 60 C. for 10 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 20%, then poured into a mold, dried for 24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 80 C., and then dried for 10 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 50 (where 50 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 50% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(28) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum (See FIG. 7) of TPEG 50, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 50, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 50, as shown in FIG. 7. The 1H-NMR spectrum (see FIG. 8) of TPEG 50 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 50.

(29) The prepared sample TPEG50 exhibits a good shape memory performance. As shown in FIG. 9, the initial shape fixity ratio is about 98.74%, and the primary shape recovery ratio is about 91.40%; the secondary shape fixity ratio is about 97.90%, and the secondary shape recovery ratio is about 89.30%; and the tertiary shape fixity ratio is about 98.20%, and the tertiary shape recovery ratio is about 87.95%.

Example 5

(30) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 60 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 40 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 60 C. for 10 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 20%, then poured into a mold, dried for 24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 60 C., and then dried for 24 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 60 (where 60 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 60% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(31) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum of TPEG 60, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 60, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 60, as shown in FIG. 10. The 1H-NMR spectrum of TPEG 60 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 60.

Example 6

(32) Under the protection of nitrogen, methyl allyl polyethenoxy ether (TPEG2400, 80 g), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA, 20 g), and water (200 g) were sequentially added to a three-neck flask, and then an initiator ammonium persulfate (5 mM) was additionally added, and reacted at 60 C. for 10 hrs with stirring. After reaction, the polymer in the solution was adjusted to have a mass fraction of 20%, then poured into a mold, dried for 24 hrs in an air-blowing drier at 60 C., and then dried for 24 hrs under vacuum, to obtain a shape memory polymer, which is designated as TPEG 80 (where 80 indicates that the amount of the raw material TPEG accounts for 80% of the total weight of the raw materials TPEG and DMAEMA).

(33) It is found through comparison of the IR spectra of DMAEMA and TPEG that in the IR spectrum of TPEG 80, a CC vibration peak at 1640 cm.sup.1 of DMAEMA is disappeared, suggesting that the raw material DMAEMA is successfully polymerized. In the IR spectrum of TPEG 80, there are a CO vibration peak appeared at 1721 cm.sup.1 and a COC vibration peak appeared at 1104-1146 cm.sup.1, suggesting that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 80, as shown in FIG. 11. The 1H-NMR spectrum of TPEG 80 shows a methyl proton signal (N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.19 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2N(CH.sub.3).sub.2) of DMAEMA detected at 2.63 ppm; a methylene proton signal (CH.sub.2CH.sub.2O) of TPEG detected at 3.52 ppm; and a terminal OH proton signal of TPEG detected at 3.11 ppm. The 1H-NMR spectrum shows that the DMAEMA and the TPEG are successfully polymerized into TPEG 80.

(34) The result of contact angle test of TPEG80 prepared in Example 6 is shown in FIG. 12. The static contact angle of the sample is about 24, indicating that the sample has a high hydrophilicity. Meanwhile, as is well known, polyethylene glycol is a highly biocompatible polymer having a good hydrophilicity. Therefore, the contact angle test indicates that Sample TPEG80 also has a good biocompatibility.

(35) The shape memory polymers prepared in Examples 1-6 were analyzed by an elemental analyzer. The result is shown in Table 1. The dynamic mechanical properties of the shape memory polymers prepared in Example 1-5 are shown in FIG. 13. The thermal properties of the shape memory polymers prepared in Example 1-6 are shown in FIG. 14.

(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Elemental analysis of shape memory polymers Weight ratio of Content in raw materials Elemental composition the polymer Sample (DMAEMA:TPEG) N C H S TPEG DMAEMA TPEG20 8:2 6.21 57.07 9.23 0.19 30.27 69.73 TPEG30 7:3 5.26 26.11 9.15 0.19 40.93 59.07 TPEG40 6:4 4.63 56.20 9.13 0.17 48.00 52.00 TPEG50 5:5 4.17 55.67 9.08 0.22 53.17 46.83 TPEG60 4:6 2.93 54.39 9.02 0.19 67.10 32.90 TPEG80 2:8 1.41 51.80 9.31 0.23 84.17 15.83 Note: calculated based on the weight of nitrogen atom.