A NON-CONSUMABLE TOOL AND A PROCESS FOR SOLID-STATE PRODUCTION OF A CHANNEL AND A WELD JOINT, AND A STRUCTURE OF AT LEAST TWO COMPONENTS BASED ON ORIGINALLY BULK COMPONENTS OF SIMILAR, OR DISSIMILAR, MATERIALS
20190210147 ยท 2019-07-11
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B23K20/1215
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K20/122
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
The invention relates to a rotatable, plungeable and free path travelable non-consumable tool (5) for production of a channel (2) and a weld joint (1). The tool (5) comprises a shoulder and a probe, the shoulder having a surface facing the material(s) of components (3) to be processed. The shoulder and the probe are arranged to have a simultaneous and synchronized action in the materials of at least two components (3) to be processed. The shoulder facing the at least two components (3) to be processed has a system of scrolls shaped to have an inward action and an outward action on the at least two components (3) to be processed. The probe has a cylindrical or conical surface having a top zone, provided with a profile having a push-up action on the components (3) to be processed in a direction towards the shoulder. The top zone ends at or in the vicinity of a bottom zone provided with a profile having a push-down action on the components (3) to be processed in a direction towards the tip. The tool (5) enables the production of a channel (2) and a weld (1), between said at least two components (3), in one single action.
Claims
1-18. (canceled)
19. A process for solid-state production of a channel and a weld joint, wherein the channel and weld are produced simultaneously by a rotating non-consumable tool with a shoulder and a probe, where both are able to apply simultaneously solid-state joining and material extracting mechanisms into the materials within the stirred processed zone, wherein the channel and the weld between at least two material components are produced in one single and simultaneous action.
20. A process according to claim 19, wherein by rotating the non-consumable tool with no gap between the shoulder of the tool and the uppermost surface of the at least two components being processed, resulting in that the synchronized and simultaneous actions of the shoulder and the probe activate solid-state joining mechanisms between the at least two components and extract out into a flash a part of the material of the at least two components being processed, the amount of material extracted out from the components having a corresponding volume as the volume left empty in the form of the internally closed channel, the channel and the weld being produced simultaneously, in one single action, in the at least two components, and the flash being self-detachable, or non-self-detachable.
21. A process according to claim 19, wherein the said at least two components, at least along the zone being processed, are fully bulk, or massive, with no welds or pre-shapes existing, before the process is applied.
22. A process according to claim 19, wherein the rotating non-consumable tool is plunged and traversed within the at least two components to be processed, thereby producing simultaneous and synchronized actions, namely the probe with a bottom zone pushing-down to stir the material of the at least two components and activate solid-state joining mechanisms within the processed zone of the at least two components, thereby producing a weld, and a top zone pushing-up part of material from the processed zone into the shoulder direction, where the part of the system of scrolls with a profile with outward action flows the material out of the processed zone, into external flash, and the part of the system of scrolls with a profile with inward action generates a ceiling for the channel, closing it.
23. A process according claim 19, wherein the said at least two components are overlapping, abutting or in an arrangement including simultaneously overlapping and abutting each other.
24. A process according to claim 19, wherein the arrangement between the multiple components, before the processing can be tight, or include air-gaps.
25. A process according to claim 19, wherein the at least two components are made of the same or different materials, the materials being selected among metals.
26. A process according to 19, wherein the at least two components have similar or dissimilar dimensions.
27. A process according to 19, wherein the channel and the weld are produced simultaneously along any free-path direction within the bulk components comprising at least two components.
28. A process according to 19, wherein the dimension of the channel produced along the processed free-path within the said at least two components, is constant, continuously variable or a combination of constant and variable zones.
29. A process according to 19, wherein in the non-consumable tool the distance between the tip of the probe and the surface of the shoulder facing the at least two material components to be processed is dimensioned in such a manner that at least the tip of the probe may penetrate into all of said at least two components, and the surface of the shoulder, with its system of scrolls, and is arranged to engage, with no gap, or even having a shallow penetration in the surface of the uppermost component when the tip of the probe has penetrated into all said at least two components and processes it.
Description
LIST OF FIGURES
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0030]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0031] In the following the invention is described in more detail in the form of preferred embodiments referring to the
[0032] In
[0033]
a) Overlap joint design, wherein three components 3 overlapping each other are joined together by producing a channel 2 and a welding 1 between all three components 3. Symbols m and n in the figure refer to the number of components 3.
b) Butt joint design, wherein two components 3 are welded 1 with an internal channel 2 to form a butt joint between them. Symbols m and n in the figure refer to the number of components 3.
c) Two examples of combination of overlap and butt joints, wherein components 3 are welded 1 with an internal channel 2 to form a butt joint between them. Symbols m and n in the figure refer to the number of components 3.
[0034] In
[0035] As depicted in
[0036] The process of the invention is a solid-state process that is applied to join or weld 1 multiple components 3 with a channel 2 within the processed zone. The application of the process of the invention is done by plunging a rotating rigid non-consumable tool 5 with a shoulder 5b and a probe 5a rotating together, where both are able to apply simultaneously push up and down effects into the zone of at least two components 3 to be processed. The tool 5 has a probe 5a and a shoulder 5b that can be made of separated sub-components assembled together, or made of one only part.
[0037] The rotating and plunging tool 5 travels along the path, which may be manually or automatically, resulting simultaneously in the channel 2 and weld 1 to be produced. The at least two components 3 are strongly clamped 6, against an anvil 7. The plunging and rotating probe 5a will apply into the at least two components 3 a combined push-up and push-down actions producing the channel and the weld, respectively. The likewise plunging and rotating shoulder 5b will apply a combined inward and outward actions closing the top of the channel and producing the external detachable flash 4, respectively. The channel 2 is surrounded by a stirred zone with contribution from the at least two components 3, where the solid-state joining mechanisms have been activated, resulting in the welding 1 of the at least two components 3. The resulting flash 4 that flows out of the tool domain is removable.
[0038] In
[0039] The process of the invention does not require any tilt angle of the tool 5, enabling the application of the process of the invention in the production of channels 2 with complex paths. The multiple components 3 can have different sizes and materials. In addition, any of the multiple components along the processed path are made of one component or made of piecewise sub-components. The quantity of the multiple components is not restricted therefore the weld 1 and the channel 2 can be made between two or more components 3. The joint between the multiple components 3 can be designed in multiple configurations with or without air-gap 8. The multiple configurations for the process of the invention are overlap joint, butt joint or a combination of overlap with butt joint. The top surface of the processed zone can be left, with reinforcement, or in its original position, by varying the amount of flash 4 that flows out of the domain of the processed zone. The principle is that the volume of flash material that flows out of the processed domain is equal, or less, to the volume of the channel. At least two components and sub components 3 are made of massive or bulk materials with no welds or pre-shapes, including but not limited to grooves, open or closed channels or recess existing, before the process is applied
[0040] In
[0041] In
Further Findings and Details on Tool Design
[0042] It has been found that tool design, in combination with proper processing parameters, is a crucial aspect of FSP technologies. Tool design is responsible for creating the frictional heating and promoting the distinct viscoplasticized material flows observed during operation. Inadequate tool design will fail to produce closed and continuous channels regardless of the processing parameters. However, a tool with the perfect geometry will also fail to produce closed and continuous channels with improper processing parameters. Parameters for the process of invention include but are not limited to tool rotation speed and tool travel speed. The tool rotation speed ranges from 200 to 1000 rpm and the tool travel speed ranges from 30 to 500 mm/min.
Probe Design
[0043] Probe design is crucial to the channel formation and joining of multiple components during the process of the invention. The probe is responsible for the frictional heating, shear deformation and mixing of the viscoplasticized material in the third body region.
[0044] The probe geometry is responsible for creating a flow of material from the processed zone to the shoulder and for creating a mixing and forging effect in the weld zone. The probes of the invention are specifically designed to function as a channeling probe while also performing necessary welding functions. This is accomplished by applying a welding probe profile to the tip of a standard FSC probe as represented in
[0045] Three distinct probe models were created and manufactured by adjusting the length of the welding tip to 3 mm, 4 mm or 5 mm lengths. Changing the length of the welding tip provides different levels of flexibility in the tool set up concerning probe protrusion length and in the performance of the tool during channeling. Too small of a welding tip will result in an inadequate weld nugget and low flexibility in tool setup. Too large of a welding tip will result in excess bending forces on the tool during operation and an oversized welding nugget. However, a larger welding tip provides more flexibility in tool setup.
[0046] Probes were made out of AISI H13 tool steel. It was chosen for tooling production due to the mechanical properties and attributes of the steel grade. H13 has a high resistance to thermal shock and thermal fatigue, good high temperature strength, excellent toughness and ductility, good machinability, excellent through-hardening properties and good dimensional stability during hardening [10]. All probes were heat treated to 50 HRC for optimal wear resistant properties.
[0047] All HFSC probes were successful in producing an internal closed channel and a weld in aluminium plates. To understand the differences in performance of each of the probes, the weld nugget was examined (
[0048] Along with the production of stable welds, all three probes produced unstable welds as well. The main defect phenomenon observed was the hook effect on the advancing side (AS) of the weld at the interface zone (
[0049] To eliminate this hook effect phenomenon, a new probe design was considered. For this design a 4 mm welding tip was utilized based on the findings presented previously regarding the weld quality produced by the three HFSC probes. The new design reduced the overall diameter of the welding tip by 2 mm to incorporate a 1 mm shoulder at the interface between the channeling section and the welding tip of the probe. The shoulder was designed to increase the forging effect of the probe on the weld, in order to reduce the reverse flow of material, effectively eliminating the lifting effect. The shoulder was also designed to reduce the tilt in the channel bottom produced by the HFSC probes.
[0050] Based on channel geometric features, channel stability, the size of the effective weld thickness and the forces acting on the probe, the optimal probe design was found to be the 4 mm HFSC probe.
Shoulder Design
[0051] Shoulder geometry is crucial to the channel formation and flash removal during the HFSC process. The shoulder is responsible for forging the viscoplasticized material extracted by the probe down into the top of the channel forming the channel ceiling as well as to remove a specific amount of material in the form of detached flash. By creating detached flash, the processed surface is left at the initial level of the metallic component.
[0052] An already existing shoulder with an outer diameter of 24 mm was chosen and utilized as the control for the development of all new shoulders, in order to have a reference point for quality, performance and design criteria. All developed shoulders possess an outer diameter of 2.2 times the probe diameter. The shoulder names can be understood in Table 1. All shoulders were made out of the same AISI H13 steel and underwent the same heat treatment as the probes. In order to evaluate the performance of the shoulders on channel production, several assessment criteria were established.
[0053] Assessment Criteria for Shoulder Performance
1. Channel is closed and continuous.
2. Flash is removed and processed surface is left at initial level.
3. Channel cross-section is stable in regards to shape and size.
4. Channel quality is constant and stable concerning surface roughness.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 + Positive Scroll Negative Groove # Number of Scrolls or Grooves IN Moves Material Towards Probe OUT Moves Material Away From Probe # Angle of Scroll or Groove from Probe to outside of Shoulder B Bevelled Edge # Angle of Bevel
[0054] Several different shoulders were manufactured and tested. Shoulder (+1OUT300/+1IN90) was chosen as the optimal shoulder for further testing and development. In an attempt to manipulate channel size, two alternative shoulders were created by altering the scroll height from 1 mm to 1.5 mm and 2 mm. In theory, a scroll with a larger height would allow more material to flow out of the processed zone into the shoulder cavity. This increased flow of material would be removed from the processed zone in the form of detached flash. Subsequently, the channel would be larger than that produced by a shorter scroll.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Rating of Shoulders Performance According to Assessment Criteria Consistency Channel Closed Removed (shape and quality Shoulder channel flash size) (Roughness) Total Control 0 0 0 0 0 Flat 1 0 1 1 3 (+1OUT300/ 1 0.8 1 1 3.8 +1IN90
+1OUT300/+1IN90
[0055] The majority of the scroll is flat with a rib radiating outwards from the start position. Width and height of the rib are 0.068 and 0.045 times the shoulder diameter, respectively. Curvature of the end and star of the scroll equals to the width of the scroll. The flat area of the scroll produces a consistent, constant and even forging force as well as it maintains a large contact time throughout a single rotation. The scroll width increases from the start position in an arced path until making contact with the probe hole after 90 C. rotation. The flared section then tapers off to the shoulder surface while the rib continues to radiate outward 300 in total. The rib contacts the outer edge of the shoulder after 280. The rib has 0.5 mm fillet between itself and the flat area. The reentrant, located at the start of the scroll, is designed to induce an inward flow of material back to the probe reducing the speed and quantity of material being extracted to the periphery of the shoulder. Large scroll rotation angle increases the shear edge of the scroll while allowing for an outward flow of material. The increased shear edge of the scroll promotes the detachment of the flash from the processed surface. The scroll contact to the outer edge of the shoulder forces the processed material out of the processed zone reducing the chances of material deposits on the processed surface.
[0056] It was observed that the original shoulder with 1 mm scroll produced stable channels with no flash deposits, leaving the processed surface at the initial level. The shoulders with 1.5 mm and 2 mm high scrolls failed to produce closed and continuous channels. The flash formation created by these shoulders was large and continuous. Most of the flash was removed in large, spiraling strands with small amounts sticking to the processed surface. The 1.5 mm and 2 mm scrolls failed to create closed and continuous channels due to the excess material extracted as flash from the processed zone. The excess material extracted was caused by the increased volume of the pocket around the scroll, allowing more material to be processed and removed instead of being forged back into the channel ceiling.
[0057] Material build-up in shoulder (+1OUT300/+1IN90) is consistent throughout channeling operation. The re-entrant feature consistently fills with material during channeling, resulting in a lack of flow to the probe in this area. However, the accumulation of aluminium has an adverse benefit of slowing extracted material as it is pushed to the periphery of the shoulder. This phenomenon is caused due to material properties of aluminium. As aluminium is processed in a viscoplasticized state, the aluminium wants to stick to aluminium. With the re-entrant feature accumulating aluminium, all future material extracted sticks to this reservoir of aluminium effectively slowing the flow of extracted material. This slowing of material promotes and increases the forging effect of the scroll resulting in a closed and continuous channel formation.
[0058] Based on the findings of the inventors it was determined that the optimal shoulder geometry is shoulder (+1OUT300/+1IN90). With the validation of a functional and optimized shoulder design all further studies were performed with the use of shoulder (+1OUT300/+1IN90). It can be seen in the
CITATIONS
[0059] [1] W. M. Thomas, E. D. Nicholas, J. C. Needham, M. G. Murch, P. Temple-Smith, C. J. Dawes, U.S. Pat. No. 5,460,317: Friction welding. 24 Oct. 1995. [0060] [2] R. S. Mishra, U.S. Pat. No. 6,923,362: Integral channels in metal components and fabrication thereof. 2 Aug. 2005. [0061] [3] N. Balasubramanian, R. S. Mishra, K. Krishnamurthy (2009) Friction Stir Channeling: Characterization of the Channels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology (vol. 209), pp. 3696-3704. [0062] [4] P. Vilaa, C. Vidal. Patent PT 105628: Process of Opening Internal Continuous Channels in Massive Components Without Changing the Original Position of the Processed Surface and Respective Modular Adjustable Tool. 15 Apr. 2013. [0063] [5] C. Vidal (2014) Development and Mechanical Characterization of a New Manufacturing Technology: Friction Stir Channeling. PhD thesis in Mechanical Engineering at
[0064] Instituto Superior Tcnico, University of Lisbon, Portugal. [0065] [6] P. Vilaa, J. Gandra, C. Vidal (2012) Linear Friction Based Processing Technologies for Aluminum Alloys: Surfacing, Stir Welding and Stir Channeling. Aluminium AlloysNew Trends in Fabrication and Applications, Chapter 7, InTech. pp. 159-197. [0066] [7] A. Rashidi, A. Mostafapour, S. Salahi, V. Rezazadeh (2013) Modified Friction Stir Channeling: A Novel Technique for Fabrication of Friction Stir Channel, Applied Mechanics and Materials (vol. 302), pp 365-370. [0067] [8] A. Rashidi, A. Mostafapour (2015) Influence of tool pin geometry and moving paths of tool on channel formation mechanism in modified friction stir channeling technique. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (Vol. 80), pp. 1087-1096. [0068] [9] R. Davis, U.S. Pat. No. 8,783,366: Article of manufacture having a sub-surface friction stir welded channel. 22 Jul. 2014. [0069] [10} Uddeholm, Uddeholm, 09, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.uddeholm.com/files/PB_orvar_supreme_english.pdf. [Accessed 16 Dec. 2016].
LIST OF NOMENCLATURE
[0070] 1Weld [0071] 2Channel [0072] 3Components [0073] 4Flash, self-detachable, or non-self-detachable [0074] 5Non-consumable tool [0075] 5aProbe [0076] 5bShoulder [0077] 6Clamping system [0078] 7Anvil [0079] 8Air-gap between the components (3) before being processed [0080] 9Probe top zone [0081] 9aThread profile having a push-up action [0082] 10Probe bottom zone [0083] 10aThread profile having a push-down action [0084] 11Tip surface of the probe [0085] 12Base surface of the shoulder [0086] 13Part of the system of scrolls with a profile with outward action [0087] 14Part of the system of scrolls with a profile with inward action [0088] 15Centralized space for the probe (5a)