METHOD TO INCREASE THE PERMEABILITY OF THE PLASMA MEMBRANE OF CELLS AND A STRUCTURE SUITABLE FOR USE IN SUCH METHOD

Abstract

The invention relates to a method to increase the permeability of the plasma membrane of cells by introducing at least one cell on or near a structure comprising particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation. The particles, present in a concentration ranging between 0.001 vol % and 20 vol %, are embedded in the material of the structure. At least 60% of the particles present in the structure are embedded in the material in such a way that the shortest distance L between these particles and the free area surface S of the structure ranges between 1 nm and 500 nm.

The invention further relates to a structure suitable for use in a photothermal process to permeabilize cells and to the use of such structure.

Claims

1. A method to increase the permeability of the plasma membrane of cells, said method comprising the steps of providing a structure comprising a material and comprising particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation embedded in said material, said particles having an average equivalent spherical diameter d, said structure defining a volume V and a free area surface S, said particles being present in said structure in a concentration ranging between 0.001 vol % and 20 vol % (volume particles/volume structure), at least P percent of said particles present in said structure being embedded in said material in such a way that the shortest distance L between said P percent of said particles and said free area surface S of said structure ranges between 1 nm and 500 nm; P being at least 60%, introducing at least one cell on or at a distance of less than 100 pm from said structure; irradiating said structure with electromagnetic radiation.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said particles are present in said structure in a concentration ranging between 0.01 vol % and 5 vol %.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the surface density of particles positioned at a shortest distance L from said free area surface S of said structure with L ranging between 5 nm and 500 nm ranges between 104 prrr2 and 1/d2, with the surface density of particles being defined as the number of particles N present in said structure multiplied with said percent P of said particles being positioned at said shortest distance L from said free area surface divided by the free area surface of said structure (N.Math.P/S)

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein at least 95% of said particles is not exposed to said free area surface of said structure.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said particles comprise particles selected from the group consisting of metal particles, metal oxide particles, carbon or carbon based particles and particles comprising one or more light absorbing compound and particles loaded or functionalized with one or more light absorbing compound.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said material comprises an inorganic material or an inorganic based material, a ceramic or ceramic based material, an organic material or organic based material, or a composite material comprising at least one of these materials.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein said material comprises a material or a surface modified material with said material being selected from the group consisting of polystyrene, polycaprolacton, ethylcellulose, cellulose acetophthalate, polylactic acid, polylactic-co-glycolic acid, cellulose, polyvinylalcohol, polyethylene glycol, gelatin, collagen, silk, alginate, hyaluronic acid, dextran, starch, polycarbonate and polyacrylate.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein said structure comprises a porous structure or a non porous structure.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein said structure comprises a porous structure having a porosity of at least 50%.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein said porous structures comprises fibres, particulates, a combination of fibres and particulates or a foam, with said particles being embedded in said fibres, said particulates or said foam.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said irradiating comprises irradiation with a pulsed radiation source having pulses having a duration in the range of 1 fs to 1 ps and/or having a fluence per pulse ranging between 0.001 and 10 J/cm2.

12. A structure suitable for use in a photothermal process to permeabilize cells that are introduced on or near said structure, said structure comprising a material and comprising particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation embedded in said material, said particles having an average equivalent spherical diameter d, said structure defining a volume V and a free area surface S, said particles being present in said structure in a concentration ranging between 0.001 vol % and 20 vol % (volume particles/volume structure), at least P percent of said particles present in said structure being embedded in said material in such a way that the shortest distance L between said P percent of said particles and said free area surface S of said structure ranges between 1 nm and 500 nm, P being at least 60%.

13. Use of the structure according to claim 12 in drug screening, in cell therapy, in immunotherapy, in gene therapy in cell labelling, in the production of engineered cells and in protein interference studies.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0109] The present invention will be discussed in more detail below, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:

[0110] FIG. 1 schematically illustrates the method to increase the permeability of a cell membrane according to the present invention;

[0111] FIG. 2 shows confocal images showing the calcein-AM viability staining and intracellular delivery of red fluorescently labelled dextran of 10 kDa (RD10) with a single 7 ns laser pulse of increasing fluence;

[0112] FIG. 3 shows the delivery efficiency of red fluorescently labeled 10 kDa dextran (RD10) and cell viability (Calcein positive cells) using different laser pulse fluences and concentrations of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP);

[0113] FIG. 4 shows confocal images in case of repeated photoporation first with red fluorescent 10 kDa dextran (RD10) followed by green fluorescent FITC-dextran (FD10);

[0114] FIG. 5 shows flow cytometry data in case of repeated photoporation with RD10 and FD10 showing that 90% of cells contain both RD10 and FD10;

[0115] FIG. 6 shows the delivery efficiency in case of consecutive photoporation of HELA cells with FD10, doubling its concentration between each photoporation step (N=1 to 4);

[0116] FIG. 7 shows the average relative mean fluorescence intensity (rMFI) per cell with increasing number of photoporation steps in case of consecutive photoporation of HELA cells with FD10;

[0117] FIG. 8 shows the delivery efficiency of FITC-dextran molecules of various molecular weights (10, 40, 70, 150 and 500 kD) for increasing number of photoporations (N=1, 2, 4);

[0118] FIG. 9 shows the relative mean fluorescence intensity (rMFI) per cell for different FITC-dextran molecules with increasing number of photoporations;

[0119] FIG. 10 shows the delivery efficiency and viability of FD10 in Jurkat cells for a structure comprising fibres having different concentrations of IONP and irradiated with a laser pulse of different fluence;

[0120] FIG. 11 shows the iron concentration measured by ICP-MS in untreated cells (negative control), cells incubated with IONP (positive control) and cells treated by photoporation with a structure composed of fibres containing different concentration of IONP;

[0121] FIG. 12 shows the iron concentration measured by ICP-MS in distilled water (negative control) in fibres with different concentrations of IONP digested by aqua regia (positive control) digesting an amount of fibres comparable to a culture well with different concentrations of IONP, and in distilled water collected from the structure after photoporation;

[0122] FIG. 13 shows the MFI, knockdown efficiency and cell viability of H1299 cells stably expressing GFP and grown on fibre substrates after N repeated photoporations (N=1-4), the fibre substrates comprise IONPs with different concentrations C of siRNA (C=0.5-50 μM);

[0123] FIG. 14 shows the intracellular delivery of FD10 in human T cells by photoporation using different IONP concentrations and laser fluences;

[0124] FIG. 15 shows the intracellular delivery of FD10 in human T cells in case of repeated photoporation (N=1 to 4);

[0125] FIG. 16 shows the siRNA delivery performance in stimulated human T cells using electroporation (EP), photoporation according to the present invention (PEN) and gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation (PP) showing the viability (FIG. 16a) and the transfection yield (FIG. 16b), with the transfection yield being the percentage of living and transfected cells obtained by multiplying the percentage of positive cells with the percentage of living cells;

[0126] FIG. 17 shows an exemplary histogram showing PD1 expression in CD3+ T cells;

[0127] FIG. 18 shows the level of PD1 knockdown in human CD3 T cell with siRNA up to 72 hours after delivery by electroporation (EP), photoporation according to the present invention (PEN) and gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation (PP);

[0128] FIG. 19 shows the application of a structure comprising nanofibres from Polycaprolactone (PCL) with 1% IONPs for Cas-9 gene knockout in H1299;

[0129] FIG. 20 shows the application of a structure comprising nanofibres from Polycaprolactone (PCL) with 1% IONPs for macromolecular delivery in H9 Human Embryonic stem cells;

[0130] FIG. 21a and FIG. 21b show an alternative example of a structure to increase the permeability of a plasma membrane of cells comprising a polymer sheet;

[0131] FIG. 22 shows the FD500 positive cells, the viability and the relative mean fluorescence intensity for photoporation of HeLa cells using polymer sheets having different concentrations of IONPs;

[0132] FIG. 23 shows the percentage of FD500 positive cells, the percentage of viable cells and the relative mean fluorescence intensity for photoporation of HeLa cells using polymer sheets having a particular concentration of IONPs using different laser fluences.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0133] The present invention will be described with respect to particular embodiments and with reference to certain drawings, but the invention is not limited thereto but only by the claims. The drawings are only schematic and are non-limiting. The size of some of the elements in the drawings may be exaggerated and not drawn to scale for illustrative purposes. The dimensions and relative dimensions do not correspond to actual reductions to practice the invention.

[0134] When referring to the endpoints of a range, the endpoints values of the range are included.

[0135] When describing the invention, the terms used are construed in accordance with the following definitions, unless indicated otherwise.

[0136] The terms ‘first’, ‘second’ and the like used in the description as well as in the claims, are used to distinguish between similar elements and not necessarily describe a sequence, either temporally, spatially, in ranking or in any other manner. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in other sequences than described or illustrated herein.

[0137] The term ‘and/or’ when listing two or more items, means that any one of the listed items can by employed by itself or that any combination of two or more of the listed items can be employed.

[0138] The term ‘cell’ refers to all types of biological cells, including eukaryotic cells an prokaryotic cells.

[0139] The terms ‘increase the permeability of’, ‘permeabilize’, ‘permeabilizing’ and ‘permeabilization’ refer to any way to alter the permeablility of a membrane or barrier, for example the plasma membrane of a cell, at least partially or locally. After permeabilization, the membrane or barrier, for example the plasma membrane of a cell is altered in such a way that it is more permeable for one or more types of compounds as for example molecules, macromolecules, particles or nanoparticles.

[0140] The terms ‘perforate’, ‘perforating’ or ‘perforation’ refer to any way to provide a membrane or barrier, for example the plasma membrane of a cell, with one or more openings, holes or pores. By perforating a membrane or barrier, for example the plasma membrane of a cell, openings are created into the membrane or barrier, for example the plasma membrane of a cell, allowing the transport of compounds, such as molecules, macromolecules, particles or nanoparticles across the membrane or barrier, for example across the plasma membrane of a cell.

[0141] For the purpose of this invention the terms ‘increase the permeability of’, ‘permeabilize’, ‘permeabilizing’ and ‘permeabilization’ and the terms ‘perforate’, ‘perforating’ and ‘perforation’ are interchangeably used.

[0142] Similarly, for the purpose of this invention the terms ‘opening’, ‘hole’, and ‘pore’ are interchangeably used.

EXAMPLE 1

Porous Structure Comprising a Web of Nanofibres and Particles Embedded in the Nanofibres

[0143] A second embodiment of a structure according to the present invention comprises a porous structure comprising nanofibres and particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation embedded in the nanofibres. The below described examples comprise polycaprolactone as material of the structure and iron oxide nanopowder as particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation. It is clear that other materials and other particles can be considered as well.

1.a Synthesis and Characterization of Photothermal Electrospun Nanofibres

[0144] The following materials are used for the synthesis of the web of nanofibres: [0145] Polycaprolactone (PCL, Mw ≈70,000 g/mol); [0146] N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF); [0147] Tetrahydrofuran (THF); [0148] iron oxide (Fe.sub.3O.sub.4) nanopowder (IONP) (#MKBW3262, Sigma-Aldrich, Belgium); [0149] Poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw=17,560 g/mol, #MKBZ2824V, Sigma-Aldrich, Belgium); [0150] concentrated sulfuric acid solution (96%) (Sigma-Aldrich); [0151] Collagen I Rat Protein (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #A1048301, Gibco™, Belgium).

[0152] IONP was re-dispersed in a 1:1 DMF/THF solution to which PCL in different concentrations between 0 vol % and 1.15 vol % was added.

[0153] The thus obtained mixture was used to manufacture nanofibres by electrospinning. The nanofibres were collected on microscope glass slides (#1000912, Marienfeld, Germany) mounted on a grounded rotating collector.

[0154] During electrospinning, unless otherwise specified, the applied voltage, flow rate and electrospinning distance were fixed at 10 kV, 0.3 ml/h and 20 cm, respectively. The grounded rotating collector was set at a rotating speed of 500 rpm. After 30 minutes (or specifically indicated time) the electrospinning process was stopped and glass slides with the nanofibre web were separated from the rotating collector and sterilized by UV irradiation for 45 minutes in a laminar flow cabinet.

[0155] The size and diameter of the nanofibres was determined using scanning and electron microscopy. The average diameter of fibres without IONP was 300 nm. The average diameter did not significantly changed when including IONP up to 1.15 vol %.

[0156] The thickness of the structure was investigated using confocal microscopy. With increasing electrospinning duration, the structure became gradually thicker up to 4 μm after 1 hour. As the webs did not change much after 30 minutes, an electrospinning time of 30 minutes was chosen.

[0157] When using increasing amounts of IONP to the nanofibres, the thickness of the nanofibre web did not change significantly. This clearly indicates that the thickness of the nanofibre web is independent of the IONP content within the used range.

[0158] IONP was embedded in the nanofibres. This could be clearly seen by SEM using a voltage of 20 kV. SEM images revealed that IONP could be present as individual particles or as clusters of two or more individual particles. For simplicity, embedded IONP is referred to as ‘IONP clusters’ or ‘clusters’ with the understanding that the terms ‘IONP clusters’ or clusters include both individual particles and clustered particles. SEM allowed to quantify the apparent density of IONP clusters throughout the web per 1000 μm.sup.2 of area in the SEM images. The density linearly increased from 1.7 to 192 clusters/1000 μm.sup.2 as the IONP content was increased from 0.0046 vol % to 1.15 vol %.

1.b Preparation of a Nanofibre Web as Cell Culture Substrate

[0159] 8-well Secure-Seal™ double sided adhesive spacers (#S24737, Invitrogen) were sterilized by UV irradiation for 45 minutes in a laminar flow cabinet. After removing the protective sealing from one side of the adhesive spacers, they were gently stuck on the nanofibre web. Next, these samples were immersed in distilled water for 3 minutes for easy removal of the web (with adhesive spacers on top) from the glass slides. The web was manually cut into smaller pieces with either one or 4 adhesive wells per piece (into which cells can be grown) and stored in PBS buffer.

[0160] Next, these cell culture substrates were further modified with collagen for optimal cell attachment. Cell culture substrates were immersed in 32% sulfuric acid solution (3 ml per well of 6-well plate) for 3 minutes. After washing with distilled water, they were immersed into an aqueous solution of the polyelectrolyte PAH (2 mg/ml, 0.5M NaCl) for 15 minutes and rinsed 3 times with distilled water. Physisorption of PAH to the nanofibre surface made the nanofibres positively charged. Next, the PAH coated nanofibres were immersed in a 0.5 mg/ml aqueous solution of Collagen I Rat Tail Protein for 15 minutes and rinsed with PBS solution. Finally, the modified substrates were stored in PBS before further use.

1.c. Culturing or Collecting Cells in the Cell Culture Substrates for Photoporation Treatment

[0161] HeLa cells (#CCL-2) and Jurkat clone E6.1 (#TIB-152) were obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) and employed as model for the transfection of respectively adherent and suspension cells by photoporation. Human lung epithelial cells (H1299) stably expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) were used for the validation of siRNA knockdown experiments. HeLa cell culture medium was made from DMEM/F-12 with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycine and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). H1299 and Jurkat cell culture medium consisted of RPMI1640 with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycine and 10% FBS.

[0162] To grow adherent cells, cell culture substrates were placed in 6-well titer plates (#10062-892, VWR) to which HeLa or H1299 were added (˜1×10.sup.6 cells in 2 ml cell culture medium). Cells were allowed to attach and grow during 24 hours in a cell incubator at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO.sub.2. Just prior to photoporation treatment, the molecules of interest that need to be delivered into the cells were added to the cell medium.

[0163] Jurkat cells were cultured in 75 cm.sup.2 or 175 cm.sup.2 flasks (#734-2313, #734-2315, VWR®) at a cell density between 1×10.sup.5 and 1 ×10.sup.6 cells/ml. For photoporation, the molecules of interest were added to the cell medium and cells were transferred to the cell substrates at ˜2×10.sup.5 cells/well. Cells were allowed to sediment on the fibre web during 5 minutes before starting the photoporation laser scanning.

[0164] Final experiments were performed on human T cells, which were obtained from Ghent University hospital. Buffy coats were obtained from healthy donors. Periperheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated via density centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Alere Technologies, Oslo, Norway). Next, PBMCs were incubated in IMDM (Gibco, Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum ((FCS, Bovogen), 100 U/ml penicillin (Gibco, Invitrogen), 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Invitrogen), 2 mM glutamine and 5 ng/ml IL-2 (Roche, Vilvoorde, Belgium) and stimulated with CD23/CD28 beads (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada r) at a 1:1 bead to cell ratio. After 7 day the cells were harvested and re-incubated with X-ray irradiated (40 Gy) (SARRP) PBMCs (1:2 ratio) and X-ray irradiated (50 Gy) JY (5:1 ratio) feeder cells in complete IMDM supplemented with 1 μg/ml phytohemagglutinin (Remel Europe, KENT, UK). After an additional 14 days, CD3+ cells were harvested and used for experiments as further indicated. Feeder cells were irradiated using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (Xstrahl, Surrey, UK). For photoporation treatment, T-cells were transferred to the culture substrates at a density of ˜8×10.sup.5 cells/well and already in the presence of the transfection molecules. Cells were allowed to sediment on the fibre web for 5 minutes before starting the laser treatment.

1.d Photoporation of Adherent Cells

[0165] The method according to the present invention is schematically illustrated in FIG. 1. First, a structure comprising material and particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation is provided (FIG. 1a.). The structure is for example synthesized as described above. Subsequently, cells are grown on the structure for example as described above (FIG. 1b.). The cells are photoporated using a custom-built optical set-up as previously reported with some minor modifications (R. H. Xiong et al., Comparison of Gold Nanoparticle Mediated Photoporation: Vapor Nanobubbles Outperform Direct Heating for Delivering Macromolecules in Live Cells, Acs Nano, 8 (2014) 6288-6296) (FIG. 1c.). Briefly, a pulsed laser with 7 ns pulse duration was tuned at a wavelength of 647 nm (Opolette™ HE 355 LD, OPOTEK Inc, CA) and applied to irradiate the structure comprising nanofibres and IONP. The collimated pulsed laser beam was directed through a 1° Light Shaping Diffuser (Physical Optics Corporation, Torrance, Calif.), which in combination with an achromat lens in front of the microscope entrance and a 10× objective lens (Plan Fluor, Nikon) resulted in a laser beam diameter of ˜250 μm at the sample. The laser pulse energy was monitored by an energy meter (J-25MB-HE&LE, Coherent) synchronized to the pulsed laser. In order to scan all the cells on the structures comprising nanofibres and IONP according to the present invention (diameter of ˜9 mm), a motorized microscope stage was used to scan the sample through the stationary laser beam. As the laser repetition rate was 20 Hz, the scanning speed was set at 3 mm/s with a distance between subsequent line of 0.15 mm. In this way, all cells received at least one laser pulse up to maximally 4 in the overlapping regions between neighboring irradiation zones. In some experiments with Jurkat or human T-cells, the cells were scanned multiple times, as indicated in the main text. In that case the cells were re-suspended within the well and allowed to sediment again between each scan in order to let the cells randomly attach to the nanofibres at new locations. The transfected cells are shown in FIG. 1d.

1.e Intracellular Delivery of Molecules by Photoporation

[0166] To evaluate the intracellular delivery by photoporation of a structure according to the present invention, red fluorescently labelled dextran of 10 kDa (RD10) was added to HeLa cells cultured in a structure comprising nanofibres and 0.23 vol % ION P. Cells were scanned with a 7 ns pulsed laser beam (λ=647 nm) as described above. After laser treatment, cells were washed and the Calcein AM viability stain was added to the cells. Exemplary confocal images using different laser fluences are shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 2a shows confocal images showing green fluorescence from the calcein AM viability staining and indicates that cell toxicity only became obvious for the highest laser fluence of 0.12 J/cm.sup.2. FIG. 2b shows confocal images showing red fluorescence from RD10, and indicates an increasing intracellular delivery of RD10 with increasing laser fluence.

[0167] Intracellular delivery of RD10 and cell viability were systematically evaluated by confocal microscopy for various laser fluences and structures prepared with different IONP concentrations (FIG. 3). Delivery efficiency was quantified as the percentage of RD10 positive cells, while viability was expressed as the percentage of Calcein positive cells. As expected, in the absence of laser irradiation (0 J/cm.sup.2), no noticeable RD10 uptake occurred into HeLa's. Upon applying laser irradiation, RD10 was successfully delivered into cells to an extent that depended on the applied laser fluence and IONP content. Increasing the laser fluence or IONP content generally lead to more intracellular delivery, although cell toxicity gradually increases as well. Interestingly, it was found that there are several combinations of laser fluences and IONP concentrations that lead to optimal delivery efficiencies. For example, for the structures with the lowest IONP content of 0.023 vol % (corresponding to 3.6 IONP/cell) a laser fluence of 0.56 J/cm.sup.2 gave >85% positive cells with ˜87% cell viability. This is virtually identical to what was obtained with the structures with 0.23 vol % IONP (43 IONP/cell) but with an almost 7× lower laser fluence of 0.08 J/cm.sup.2.

1.f Repeated Activation of Structures for Transfection of Cells

[0168] Nanoparticle sensitized photoporation methods known in the art use nanoparticles as for example gold nanoparticles which can be activated only once because they tend to fragment after the first laser pulse, resulting in a loss of their photothermal functionality. However, aimed at improving the delivery efficiency even further, multiple irradiation cycles of a structure according to the present invention was evaluated.

[0169] Cells on a structure comprising nanofibres and IONP according to the present invention were irradiated two times. In the first round RD10 was delivered as mentioned before. The cells were washed subsequently. FIG. 4a shows a confocal image after the first round. Then the cells were irradiated a second time on the same structure now in the presence of 10 kDa green fluorescent FITC-dextran macromolecules (FD10). Confocal image after the second round is given in FIG. 4b. The overlay of FIG. 4a and FIG. 4b is shown in FIG. 4c and indicates that many cells show both green and red fluorescence.

[0170] Quantitative analysis by flow cytometry given in FIG. 5 confirmed that 90% of cells were positive for both RD10 as FD10.

[0171] To provide further evidence of repeated photoporation using the same structure, HELA cells were photoporated up to 4 times with FD10. The FD10 concentration was doubled (from 0.2 mg/ml to 1.6 mg/ml) between each photoporation round to more easily see the increase in intracellular delivery (which is diffusion driven, thus requiring a concentration gradient). The percentage of positive cells after each photoporation is given in FIG. 6. The relative mean fluorescence intensity per cell after each photoporation is given in FIG. 7. While the percentage of positive cells increased from ˜70% to ˜90% (FIG. 6), the increased delivery was most apparent from the relative mean fluorescence per cell (rMFI) which increased almost linearly with each additional round of photoporation (FIG. 8).

1.g Intracellular Delivery of Large Macromolecules by Photoporation

[0172] To evaluate the intracellular delivery of larger macromolecules, i.e. molecules having a the molecular weight of proteins or mRNA, 40 kDa, 70 kDa, 150 kDa and 500 kDa FITC-dextran (FD40, FD70, FD150 & FD500) molecules were delivered in HeLa cells by 1×, 2× and 4× photoporation. Uptake was determined by flow cytometry and expressed as the percentage of positive cells (FIG. 8) and rMFI (FIG. 9).

[0173] As shown in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9, delivery efficiency gradually decreased for increasing molecular weight, which is due to a combination of molecules becoming large compared to the pore size as well as slower molecular diffusion. Repeating the photoporation procedure generally resulted in slightly more positive cells, while it did not improve the amount delivered per cell on average.

[0174] From FIG. 8 and FIG. 9, it can be concluded the method according to the present invention is successful in transfecting cells with compounds up to at least 500 kDa, with a percentage of transfected cells ranging between 65 and 90%, depending on the molecular size.

1.h Transfection of Suspension Cells by Photoporation

[0175] To investigate to which extent the method according to the present invention is successful in transfecting suspension cells, Jurkat cells (an immortalized line of human T lymphocytes which is a widely used model for hard-to-transfect primary human T cells) were used. 2 mg/ml FD10 was first added to the Jurkat cell suspension before adding the cells to the structures comprising nanofibres and IONP. Cells were allowed to sediment for 5 minutes, which was sufficient to collect them on top of the fibre web. After that, they were photoporated by scanning of the laser beam in exactly the same manner as for adherent cells. The available number of IONP clusters per cell was quantified by multiplying the Jurkat cell area with the IONP density, which in this case ranged from 7.7 to 28.4 IONP/cell.

[0176] Next the transfection efficiency as a function of laser fluence and IONP content was investigated. As shown in FIG. 10a, FIGS. 10b and 10c, the delivery efficiency increases with increasing laser fluence at the expense of cell viability as measured by the calcein red-orange AM viability stain. Similarly, the delivery efficiency generally increased when increasing the IONP content for a given laser fluence. Setting a threshold of minimal 80% viability, the best transfection efficiency (˜75% positive cells) was obtained for a structure comprising nanofibres and 0.46 vol % IONP (˜12 IONP/cell) and a laser fluence of 0.16 J/cm.sup.2. Finally, repeated photoporation was tested (FIG. 10d), again finding that the percentage of positive cells could be increased by repeating the procedure with only little effect on cell viability. Note that for this experiment a structure comprising nanofibres and 0.46 vol % IONP with a suboptimal laser fluence of 0.08 J/cm.sup.2 was used to better show the gradual improvement. Cells were gently resuspended between subsequent laser scans and allowed to sediment again so that they randomly attach to the nanofibres at new locations.

1.i ICP-MS Measurement to Detect Possible Leakage of IONP from the Structure Comprising Nanofibres and IONP Upon Laser Irradiation

[0177] To evaluate whether there was direct contact between the particles able to absorb electromagnetic radiation embedded in the material of the structure and the cell, the iron content of cells after photoporation was measured by ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry).

[0178] Irradiation of the structure comprising nanofibres and IONP was done with and without the presence of cells on the fibres. In the absence of cells, distilled water was added to the structures comprising nanofibres and particles. The distilled water was collected again after laser treatment for ICP-MS analysis. Samples with cells were prepared as described above. After laser irradiation, the cells were collected by washing with PBS in case of suspension cells, or trypsinized in case of adherent cells. Finally, 100 μl aqua regia (3:1 mixture of hydrochloric acid with nitric acid) was added to the samples for digestion of cells or other organic matter that may be present. Next, the iron content was measured by ICP-MS (Agilent 8800, Santa Clara, Calif., USA). Specifically, sample solutions were diluted 100 times in metal-free tubes, adding Y as internal standard (at a final concentration of 1 μg L.sup.−1) to correct for instrument instability and/or signal drift, to a final volume of 10 mL with 2% HNO3. External calibration standards (0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 μg L.sup.−1 Fe+1 μg L−1 Y) were prepared from a 1,000 mg L.sup.−1 Fe standard stock solution by diluting appropriate amounts using a slightly acidic solution (2% HNO.sub.3), hereby mimicking the matrix of the sample solutions. During all steps of the sample preparation the solutions were mixed thoroughly using a vortex mixer.

[0179] The internal standard correction was performed according to the following equation:

[00004]$R_{\mathrm{Fe},\mathrm{corr}}=\frac{R_{\mathrm{Fe}}}{R_Y}$

with R.sub.Fe,corr the corrected .sup.56Fe(NH.sub.3).sub.2.sup.+ signal response, R.sub.Fe the measured .sup.56Fe(NH.sub.3).sub.2.sup.+ signal response and R.sub.Y the .sup.89Y(NH.sub.3).sub.6.sup.+ signal response. The relative standard deviations were calculated via error propagation for all calculation steps (internal standardization and external calibration). Background equivalent concentrations (BEC) were calculated instead of limits of detection/quantification (LODs/LOQs) since the BEC is a more representative measure for the analytical performance as background concentrations for Fe are typically slightly elevated.

[0180] HeLa and Jurkat cells were photoporated as described above using a structure comprising nanofibres and 0.23 vol % or 0.46 vol % IONP, respectively. As a positive control cells incubated with 500 μg/ml of 30 nm IONP coated with polyethylene glycol for 4 hours at 37° C. were included as well. As shown in FIG. 11, the positive control indeed had a significantly higher iron concentration in comparison with the negative control (untreated cells) for both cell types. Importantly, however, the iron content in the photoporated cells did not differ significantly from untreated cells for any of the tested laser fluences (0.08-0.16 J/cm.sup.2) or number of laser scans (up to N=4). While this proves that there is no measurable increase in iron content in cells, one could argue that the endogenous iron content in cells is already fairly high so that small increases may not be easily detected. Therefore, the potential iron release from the structure according to the present invention when submerged in pure distilled water and irradiated with laser light (without any cells present) was evaluated. The results in FIG. 12 show that the iron content in distilled water after laser activation of the structures comprising nanofibres and IONP had not significantly increased and remained below the instrument's detection sensitivity of 0.082 mg/L. This was not only true for structures comprising nanofibres and 0.23 vol % IONP, but as well for those with the highest IONP content of 1.15 vol % even after multiple laser activation cycles (up to N=4) with a fluence up to 0.16 J/cm.sup.2. As a positive control a similar amount of fibres as is present in a structure comprising nanofibres was digested with aqua regia, which should release all of the IONP. In that case ICP-MS indeed detected very high iron concentrations proportional to the embedded IONP content (0.23 vol %, 0.46 vol % or 1.15 vol % IONP). It can be concluded the structures according to the present invention reach the intended goal of efficient cell transfections upon laser activation while avoiding any direct exposure of cells to potentially toxic sensitizing nanoparticles or its constituents.

1.j Efficient Gene Silencing in Adherent Cells by Photoporation

[0181] To evaluate the intracellular delivery of siRNA as a functional macromolecule anti-eGFP siRNA was delivered into adherent H1299 cells which stably express green fluorescence protein (GFP). Cells were grown on collagen-coated nanofibres webs having 0.23 vol % IONP at 37° C. for 24 h, after which they were photoporated (0.08 J/cm.sup.2) with control and anti-GFP siRNA, and allowed to continue to grow for 24 h before measuring GFP expression. Examination by confocal microscopy of a trial experiment with 5 μM siRNA showed clear GFP downregulation when treated with anti-GFP siRNA but not with control siRNA. Flow cytometry confirmed these results, with 77% GFP positive cells when treated with the control siRNA, which decreased to 28% after treatment with the functional siRNA. Knockdown efficiency and cytotoxicity as a function of the siRNA concentration (0.5, 1, 2 and 5 μM) was systematically evaluated. eGFP expression decreased for higher siRNA concentrations, reaching 75% of cells with significant gene silencing with 5 μM siRNA (FIGS. 13a, 13b). It was evaluated if repeated photoporation could be beneficial for siRNA gene silencing as well. Indeed, repeating the laser scanning up to 4 times with each scan, eGFP expression gradually decreased with the knockdown efficiency reaching up to 75% after 4 repeated laser irradiations. For all conditions the cell viability, here measured by the cell Titer-Glo luminescent assay, remained very good (>75%, FIG. 13b).

12.k Efficient Gene Silencing in Primary Human T-cells by Photoporation

[0182] The photoporation of human patient derived CD3+ T-cells on a structure comprising nanofibres and IONP according to the present invention was evaluated. Structures with 0.23 vol %, 1.15 vol % and 2.3 vol % IONP were prepared and T cells were transfected with a fixed laser fluence of 0.16 J/cm.sup.2 (as this was the optimum for Jurkats). The best transfection efficiency (˜30% positive cells) was obtained with 1.15 vol % IONP (FIG. 14). Next we optimized the laser fluence, confirming that the transfection efficiency was optimal at 0.16 J/cm.sup.2. Interestingly, increasing the laser fluence to 0.32 J/cm.sup.2 did not improve transfection efficiency further as predicted by our theoretical simulations. Similar to Jurkats, repeated photoporation did improve the percentage of FD10 positive cells (FIG. 15). For instance, for three times photoporation a transfection efficiency of 53% was achieved with a cell viability of >60%. Based on these results we selected I=0.16 J/cm.sup.2, 1.15 vol % IONP neutral nanofibres, and N=3 for further experiments on human T cells.

[0183] The siRNA delivery performance of photoporation in stimulated human T cells was tested with a fluorescently-labelled model siRNA (without biological function). A direct comparison was performed with two other more established physical transfection techniques, being electroporation and traditional gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation. In FIG. 16 electroporation is referred to as EP, photoporation according to the present invention is referred to as PEN and gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation is referred to as PP. As is frequently observed for electroporation, only few cells survived the treatment (14.2%, FIG. 16b) which were, however, almost all positive for siRNA (94.2%, FIG. 16a). The product of both measurements is the so-called transfection yield, i.e. the percentage of living and transfected cells, which amounted to only 13.5% for electroporation. Both gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation and photoporation using a structure according to the present invention were much more gentle to the cells with cell viabilities >60% and 40-50% positive cells. This resulted in a transfection yield of 35% for photoporation using a structure according to the present invention and 30% for gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation (FIG. 16b). As such it can be concluded that the transfection yield with photoporation according to the present invention is more than 2.5× better than for electroporation, while it is similar to traditional photoporation. The latter is an astounding achievement given the fact that this is obtained without direct contact between particles and cells according to the present invention.

[0184] To evaluate gene silencing with functional siRNA the PD-1 receptor was targeted. On the first day T-cells were collected from donors and stimulated for a first time. After 7 days, cells were collected for transfection with siRNA and stimulated a second time. Cells were transfected with 1 μM siPD1 and PD1 expression was quantified 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours later by flow cytometry after PD-1 antibody staining. Transfection was again compared between electroporation, photoporation and gold nanoparticle sensitized photoporation. Exemplary flow cytometry histograms are shown in FIG. 17, k for cells 48 hours after photoporation with control siRNA and siPD1, showing a reduction in PD1 expression in the latter case. From the decrease in PD-1 antibody staining over the entire population of living cells the knockdown efficiency was quantified over time (FIG. 18). A similar level of PD-1 gene silencing was obtained for all three transfection methods, reaching up to ˜40% knockdown after 48 h. Keeping in mind that photoporation has a 2.5× higher transfection yield than electroporation thanks to its reduced toxicity, it confirms that it is a very promising and effective transfection method for the production of engineered T-cells for adoptive T-cell therapy.

[0185] FIG. 19 shows the application of a structure comprising nanofibres from Polycaprolactone (PCL) with 1% IONPs for Cas-9 gene knockout in H1299.

[0186] FIG. 19a shows confocal images showing green fluorescence in H1299 cells stably expressing GFP before (left) and after photoporation with 4 μM Cas-9 ribonucleoproteins designed to knock-out GFP expression (right). Samples were scanned once with a laser fluence of 0.08 J/cm.sup.2.

[0187] FIG. 19b shows the corresponding cytometry histograms illustrating how eGFP expression is distributed over the cell population before and after photoporation with 90.5% and 33.5% eGFP positive cells, respectively. FIG. 19c and FIG. 19d show respectively the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and knockdown efficiency (=percentage of cells negative for eGFP) for H1299 cells that were photoporated with increasing concentration of Cas-9 ribonucleoproteins (0.5, 1, 2, 4 μM), as well as multiple times (N=2, 3, 4) with a concentration of 0.5 μM.

[0188] FIG. 20 shows the application of a structure comprising nanofibres from Polycaprolactone (PCL) with 1% IONPs for macromolecular delivery in H9 Human Embryonic stem cells.

[0189] FIG. 20a shows confocal images showing successful delivery of fluorescently labeled dextran of 10 kDa (RD10) before (top row), after one photoporation cycle (second row) and after two photoporation cycles (bottom row). Live cells are stained with Calcein AM, while dead cells can be recognized by a positive propidium iodide (PI) signal. Photoporation was performed using a laser fluence of 0.08 J/cm.sup.2.

[0190] FIG. 20b shows the cell viability and the percentage of RD positive cells quantified by imaging processing as a function of laser fluence (I=0.08, 0.12 and 0.24 J/cm.sup.2) and multiple photoporation cycles (N=2, 3, 4).

EXAMPLE 2

Non Porous Structure Comprising a Polymer Material and Nanoparticles

[0191] FIG. 21a shows a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a structure 1 according to the present invention. FIG. 21b shows the cross-section of the structure 1 shown in FIG. 21a along line A-A′. The structure 1 comprises a polymer sheet comprising a polymer material 2 and particles 3 able to absorb electromagnetic radiation. The particles 3 comprise for example carbon particles or iron oxide particles or a combination of carbon particles and iron oxide particles. The particles 3 are embedded in the material 2 and have for example an average equivalent spherical diameter d of 1000 nm.

[0192] The structure has a thickness t ranging between 0.1 μm and 100 μm and, for example a thickness of 1 μm, 2 μm or 5 μm.

[0193] The ratio of the free area surface S of the structure over the volume V of the structure, i.e. the ratio S/V, corresponds to 1/t.

[0194] The polymer sheet comprises preferably a polymer comprising or based on polystyrene, polycaprolacton, ethylcellulose, cellulose acetophthalate or polylactic-co-glycolic acid, cellulose, polyvinylalcohol, polyethylene glycol, gelatin, collagen, silk, alginate, hyaluronic acid, dextran, starch, polycarbonate or polyacrylate.

[0195] The particles are present in the material in a concentration ranging between 0.001 vol % and 20 vol % (volume particles/volume structure), for example in a concentration of 1 vol %, 2 vol % or 5 vol %.

[0196] Preferably, all or substantially all of the particles are completely embedded in the material of the structure, meaning that all or substantially all of the particles of the structure are completely surrounded by the material of the structure and that no particles or substantially no particles are exposed to the free area surface of the structure.

[0197] At least 60% of the particles present in the structure, are embedded in the material in such a way that the shortest distance L between this particles and the free area surface S of the structure ranges between 1 nm and 100 nm.

[0198] FIG. 22 shows the percentage of FD 500 (FICT-dextran of 500 kDa) positive cells, the viability of the cells measured via CellTiter Glo metabolic assay and the relative mean fluorescence intensity for photoporation of HeLa cells using a PLA film (2% PLA) having no IONPs (control), 0.005% IONP, 0.01% IONP and 0.1% IONP, were labeled.

[0199] Additionally, the percentage of FD500 positive cells, viability and relative mean fluorescence intensity (rMFI) was determined for photoporation (one photoporation cycle) of HeLa cells using a PLA film (2% PLA) with 0.025% IONPs using different laser fluences, respectively 0.3 J/cm.sup.2 (=E1), 0.5 J/cm.sup.2=E2)), 0.84 J/cm.sup.2 (=E3), 1.26 J/cm.sup.2 (=E4) and 1.6 J/cm.sup.2 (=E5). The results are shown in FIG. 23.