A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INSPECTING A LIGHT CONTROL LAYER FOR A SECURITY DEVICE
20220404289 · 2022-12-22
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B42D25/45
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B42D25/425
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B42D25/351
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
A method of inspecting a substantially transparent light control layer for an optically variable security device and a corresponding inspection apparatus, the substantially transparent light control layer including a surface relief defined by an array of substantially transparent refractive microstructures. The method includes: directing a beam of substantially collimated light towards a first region that is expected to contain the surface relief of the light control layer so as to generate an inspection light pattern; providing reference data that is indicative of a light control layer that meets a predetermined quality threshold; comparing the inspection light pattern with the reference data; and determining whether the light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold based on the comparison.
Claims
1. A method of inspecting a substantially transparent light control layer for an optically variable security device, the substantially transparent light control layer comprising a surface relief defined by an array of substantially transparent refractive microstructures, the method comprising: directing a beam of substantially collimated light towards a first region that is expected to contain the surface relief of the light control layer so as to generate an inspection light pattern; providing reference data that is indicative of a light control layer that meets a predetermined quality threshold; comparing the inspection light pattern with the reference data; and determining whether the light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold based on the comparison.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the light control layer is located on a web or a sheet, and the method further comprises conveying the web or sheet in a machine direction, wherein the beam of substantially collimated light is directed towards the first region as the web or sheet is conveyed in the machine direction.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the light control layer is part of a security device.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the method comprises determining the authenticity of the security device based on whether the light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the light control layer does not form part of a security device.
6-8. (canceled)
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the reference data comprises a reference value of a predetermined metric and the comparing step comprises detecting an inspection value of the predetermined metric from the inspection light pattern, and comparing the inspection value with the reference value.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the predetermined metric is any of: (i) a number of elements in the inspection light pattern; (ii) a resolution of the inspection light pattern; (iii) an intensity of the inspection light pattern; (iv) an orientation of the inspection light pattern; (v) a pitch of the inspection light pattern.
11-12. (canceled)
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference data is in the form of a reference light pattern.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the reference light pattern is obtained by directing a beam of substantially collimated light towards a reference light control layer that is known to meet the predetermined quality threshold.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the inspection light pattern is in the form of a spot pattern.
16. The method of claim 2, wherein if it is determined that the light control layer does not meet the predetermined quality threshold, the method further comprises at least one of: marking the web or sheet to indicate that the light control layer did not meet the predetermined quality threshold; noting the location on the web or sheet of the light control layer that did not meet the predetermined quality threshold; and stopping conveying the web or sheet along the machine direction.
17-18. (canceled)
19. The method of claim 1, wherein the beam of substantially collimated light is provided by a laser source.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the beam has a diameter at the first region of between 50 microns and 10 millimetres, preferably between 500 microns and 5 millimetres.
21. (canceled)
22. The method of claim 1, wherein the light control layer is formed from a transparent curable material.
23. (canceled)
24. The method of claim 1, wherein the array of refractive microstructures comprises an array of focussing elements, or wherein the array of refractive microstructures comprises an array of microprisms.
25. (canceled)
26. The method of claim 1, wherein the beam of substantially collimated light has a diameter at the first region that is greater than a pitch of the surface relief.
27. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is performed in a web-based or sheet-based manufacturing process for manufacturing security documents or security articles having security devices located thereon or therein, wherein the security devices comprise a transparent light control layer.
28. An inspection apparatus for inspecting a substantially transparent light control layer for an optically variable security device, the substantially transparent light control layer comprising a surface relief defined by an array of substantially transparent refractive microstructures, the inspection apparatus comprising: a light source configured to direct a beam of substantially collimated light towards a first region that is expected to contain the surface relief of the light control layer so as to generate an inspection light pattern; an optical sensor configured to record the inspection light pattern; and a comparison module configured to compare the recording of the inspection light pattern with reference data that is indicative of a light control layer that meets a predetermined quality threshold, and to determine whether the light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold based on the comparison.
29. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the light control layer is located on a web or a sheet, and wherein the inspection apparatus is configured to receive the web or sheet on which the light control layer is located, and convey the web or sheet through the apparatus in a machine direction.
30. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising a marking module configured to mark the web or sheet if it is determined by the comparison module that the light control layer did not meet the predetermined quality threshold.
31. (canceled)
32. The apparatus of claim 28, wherein the light source is a laser source.
33-38. (canceled)
39. A web-based or sheet-based press for manufacturing security articles or security documents, comprising an inspection apparatus adapted to perform the method of claim 1.
40. A security document or security article comprising: a transparent substrate carrying opacifying layers on opposing surfaces thereof so as to define a window region; wherein within the window region the document or article comprises: an effect generating region comprising one or more effect generating elements; an inspection region laterally offset from the effect generating region, wherein the inspection region is free of any effect generating elements; and a substantially transparent light control layer comprising a surface relief defined by an array of substantially transparent refractive microstructures, the light control layer overlapping with both the effect generating region and the inspection region, and wherein the substantially transparent light control later cooperates with the effect generating region to exhibit an optically variable effect.
41-43. (canceled)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0075] Preferred embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084]
[0085]
[0086]
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090]
[0091]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0092] An example of a light control layer that may be inspected is shown in
[0093]
[0094] As shown in
[0095] The support 100 is then conveyed along a machine direction (MD) to a casting module 220 which here comprises a casting tool 221 in the form of a cylinder carrying a surface relief 225 defining the shape of the light control layer (e.g.
[0096] focussing elements) which are to be cast into the curable material 205. The surface relief 225 may be formed in the cylinder surface itself, or on a plate mounted to the cylinder. As each instance of curable material 205 comes into contact with the cylinder 221, the curable material 205 fills a corresponding region of the relief structure, forming the surface of the curable material into the shape defined by the relief.
[0097] Once the desired microstructures have been formed in the curable material so as to form the surface relief thereof, the curable material 205 is cured by exposing it to appropriate curing energies such as radiation R (typically UV radiation) from a source 222. This preferably takes place while the curable material is in contact with the surface relief 225 of cylinder 221 although if the material is already sufficiently viscous this could be performed after separation of the curable material from the casting cylinder 221. In the example shown in
[0098] There are possible problems that may arise with such a casting process, however. One possible problem is that air bubbles may be introduced into the curable material during the casting, thus forming voids in the finished light control layer that may interact with light in an undesirable manner. Another possible issue is the accumulation of dirt or foreign matter on the surface relief of the casting cylinder, which adversely affects the casting process. The surface relief of the casting cylinder also wears over time, altering the geometry and/or dimensions of the surface relief. In some instances, the curable material may not peel off of the casting cylinder correctly as it is conveyed along the machine direction (e.g. due to under-curing), therefore generating an incorrectly formed light control layer. It is also possible that there may be a misregistration problem, in which the surface relief of the casting cylinder does not correctly align with the instances of curable material on the support layer. For example, this may happen if the surface relief 225 is in the form of a separate plate that is attached to the casting cylinder.
[0099] It will be appreciated by the person skilled in the art that the example light control layer and method of
[0100]
[0101]
[0102] The flow diagram of
[0103] In alternative embodiments, the viewing screen may be positioned on the same side of the light control layer as the laser source 1, and the inspection light pattern generated in reflection may be recorded by the camera 10 for inspection.
[0104]
[0105] However, when the laser light 3 is directed towards a light control layer 20 comprising a surface relief (e.g. as defined by an array of cylindrical micro lenses as illustrated in
[0106] The elongate microlenses of the light control layer 20 illustrated in
[0107]
[0108]
[0109] The light control layer may comprises a series of multi-faceted microprisms (i.e. having more than two facets), as shown in the example light control layer 20 of
[0110] The invention may also be used for inspection of “two dimensional” light control layers comprising “two dimensional” refractive microstructures, where the optical effect is strongly observed in two (or more) viewing directions. Such “two dimensional” light control layers are therefore not as rotationally dependent as one-dimensional light control layers. In the case of two dimensional microstructures, the inspection light pattern typically comprises two (or more) linear arrays of spots. Such examples include spherical lenses, corner cubes, square based pyramid microprisms as depicted in the light control layer 20 of
[0111] Referring back to
[0112]
[0113]
[0114]
[0115] In a yet further arrangement of inspection module 230, the laser source 1 and camera 10 may be positioned on the same side of the substrate 100 in the same manner as in
[0116] As shown in
[0117] In these examples the laser source has a power of 1 mW, but may have a power in the range of 1 mW to 20 mW, preferably 1 mW to 5 mW and is positioned a distance from the light control layer, h, of 5 mm to 1000 mm, preferably 10 mm to 100 mm .
[0118] In the examples of
[0119] Referring back to
[0120] At step S103, the inspection light pattern is compared to the reference data. In the case above where the reference data is in the form of a reference pattern, the reference pattern may simply be compared to the inspection light pattern generated at step S101 to efficiently determine whether newly-cast light control layers meet a predetermined quality threshold.
[0121] This concept is illustrated with reference to
[0122] Now suppose that the light control layer 20b is to be inspected by the inspection module 230. An image of the obtained inspection light pattern 50 is illustrated at
[0123]
[0124] At step S104, it can therefore be determined simply by a visual comparison between the inspection light pattern 50 and the reference light pattern 55 that the light control layer 20b does not meet the predetermined quality threshold.
[0125] If a light control layer does not meet the predetermined quality threshold, it may be referred to as having a “defect” (for example, the inspection light pattern obtained from the inspected light control layer may be indicative of defective pitch or skew). Such a defect may be continuous (it is present in substantially each light control layer that is formed by the web or sheet process); or it may be discrete (the defect is present in only some of the cast light control layers). In a web-based process, if the defect is discrete the web material may be marked at the position of the defect (and/or the location of the defect noted) for subsequent removal. If the defect is continuous in a web-based process, corrective action may be performed to correct the error, for example either while the web process is in progress or by stopping the web-based process to perform the correction.
[0126] In a sheet-based process, if the defect is discrete, the sheet material may be marked (or the position of the defect noted) for subsequent removal of that sheet. Alternatively, the defective sheet may be directed to a reject pile that is separate to sheets that passed the inspection process. If the defect is continuous, corrective action may be performed in a similar manner to a web process, e.g. during the process itself or by stopping the process in order to perform the correction.
[0127] If the inspection module 230 is being used for authentication of a security document having a security device comprising the light control layer, the document may be determined as a counterfeit as the microstructures of the light control layer do not meet the quality threshold.
[0128] Such a visual comparison between the inspection light pattern and the reference pattern may be performed by an operator (i.e. “on the fly”). In such cases it is not essential to record the inspection light pattern as an image, and the comparison may be made by viewing the viewing screen 9 and comparing this to the reference light pattern.
[0129] In the above examples, the reference data is in the form of a reference pattern. In embodiments, the reference data may be in the form of a reference value for one or more predetermined metrics. In such embodiments, step S103 comprises detecting an inspection value of the predetermined metric(s) from the inspection light pattern, and comparing the detected inspection value or values with the corresponding reference value(s). This may be performed alternatively or in addition to visual inspection.
[0130] The predetermined metric may be a number of elements (e.g. spots) in the light pattern when the beam of laser light is directed towards the region where the light control layer is expected to be. For example, if there is only a single spot recorded by camera 10, then this is indicative that no surface relief (i.e. no light control layer) is present. This metric may be useful to determine misregistration defects during manufacture, as schematically illustrated at
[0131] Another metric which may be used is a resolution (e.g. a size of discrete spots or a number of discrete spots per unit length) of the inspection light pattern 50. For example, the reference data may comprise a reference value for a resolution of the inspection light pattern below which the light control layer would fail the quality inspection. Therefore, a resolution of the inspection light pattern 50 may be detected and compared to the reference resolution value in order to determine whether the light control layer meets the quality threshold. In the example inspection light pattern 50 shown in
[0132] The predetermined metric may be an intensity and/or brightness of the light pattern, with the reference data comprising a value of the intensity and/or brightness of the light pattern. If the detected intensity of the inspection light pattern is below the reference value for the intensity of the inspection light pattern, then it can be inferred that the light control layer does not meet the predetermined quality threshold.
[0133] The orientation of the spots of the inspection light pattern is dependent on the orientation (“skew”) of the cast microstructures of the light control layer. For example, we saw in
[0134] The pitch of the spots (e.g. a separation distance of the spots) of the inspection light pattern is dependent on (and therefore indicative of) the pitch of the microstructures of the cast light control layer. Therefore, the predetermined metric may be a pitch of the inspection light pattern, from which the pitch of the light control layer microstructures may be inferred. Thus, it may be determined whether the light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold based on pitch.
[0135] In cases where the reference data comprises reference values for one or more predetermined metrics, the reference values may be obtained from a reference light pattern, or obtained from computer simulation methods (e.g. when the properties of the laser and the light control layer to be inspected are known).
[0136] Values for more than one predetermined metric may be obtained from the inspection light pattern (e.g. values for the intensity, resolution and pitch of the pattern) and compared to the reference values. In such a case, typically the light control layer will be deemed to have met the quality threshold only if the detected values meet the reference values for each metric.
[0137] The reference value of a predetermined metric in the reference data may take into account an acceptable level of tolerance for the inspected light control layer. In other words, the reference value of a predetermined metric may be set at a predetermined percentage of reference value for a “perfect” light control layer. For example, if the orientation of the reference light pattern obtained from a perfectly cast light control layer is at an angle of 90 degrees, the predetermined value for that metric may be the range of 88-92 degrees inclusive. An inspection light pattern having an orientation falling within the predetermined range will then be determined to have met the predetermined quality threshold within the accepted tolerance. As another example, the brightness of the light pattern obtained with a “perfect” light control layer may be 50 lumens. If the reference value for that metric is then set at 48 lumens, then any light control layer producing an inspection light pattern having a brightness of 48 lumens or greater will be determined to meet the predetermined quality threshold within accepted tolerance.
[0138] Referring back to
[0139] Steps S103 and S104 are typically performed by an appropriately programmed processor at the inspection module 230. The reference data may be stored in local storage at the inspection module 230, or stored remotely and accessed over a network such as a local area network (LAN) or the internet.
[0140]
[0141]
[0142] The printing press 1000 comprises an application module 210 and a casting module 220 (for example as described with reference to
[0143] Once the light control layers have been cast on the web 100, the web is conveyed along the machine direction to inspection module 230, for example an inspection module as described in
[0144] If it is determined that the light control layer under inspection does not meet the predetermined quality threshold, then that area of the web may be marked (or the position thereof noted) for subsequent removal of that thread/foil; or the printing process may be stopped and action taken to correct the defect.
[0145] In this example, the light control layer that is formed by application module 210 and casting module 220 forms part of a security device formed on or integrated within the security thread or foil. The final security device may typically include a further effect-generating layer that is designed to optically cooperate with the light control layer in order to form the final security device. For example, in the case where the light control layer comprises an array of microlenses the effect-generating layer may be an image layer that cooperates with the array of microlenses in order to generate a lenticular optically variable effect. In another example where the light control layer comprises an array of microprisms, the effect-generating layer may be a colour-shifting layer (e.g. thin-film interference stack, liquid crystal layer or optically variable pigment). The effect generating layer is applied by printing module 240 in register with the light control layer.
[0146] The web 100 is then re-wound at rewind module 250. The web produced by printing press 1000 may then be subjected to further processing steps, for example application of further functional layers or features to the security threads, e.g. metallisation, magnetic and/or adhesive layers. A cutting machine may then slit the web 100 into elongate security threads. Any region(s) of the web that was marked or noted as having a light control layer that did not meet the predetermined quality threshold may then be discarded.
[0147]
[0148] A reel 15 of transparent polymer substrate 100 is introduced to unwind module 300. The web of substrate comprises an mxn matrix of banknotes 102 (here, “banknote” is used to refer to banknotes at all stages of their production). The unwind module 300 conveys the web 100 through the press 2000 along the machine direction MD.
[0149] An opacifying layer module 310 applies opacifying layers to the recto and verso sides of the substrate web. The opacifying layers are omitted in localised areas so as to define window region(s) of the banknotes as is known in the art. The opacifying layer module 310 may also be used to apply an electrically conductive layer to the banknotes.
[0150] Subsequently to the opacifying layers being applied, application module 320 applies transparent curable resin to the window regions of the banknotes, which is embossed and cured at casting module 330 in order to form light control layers on the banknotes.
[0151] It will be appreciated that in alternative embodiments the opacifying layers may be applied at different points in the process. In one alternative embodiment the infeed material on reel 15 already comprises opacifying layers defining window region(s) of the banknotes with the light control layers registered to the window regions. In another alternative embodiment the opacifying layers are formed after the light control layers are formed.
[0152] The substrate web is conveyed to inspection module 340 where the formed light control layers are inspected as described above, and a determination is made as to whether or not they meet the predetermined quality threshold. For example, lateral registration of the cast light control layer is particularly important when forming the light control layers within predetermined window regions of the banknotes. If it is determined that the light control layer under inspection does not meet the predetermined quality threshold, then that area of the web may be marked (or the position thereof noted) for subsequent removal of that banknote;
[0153] or the printing process may be stopped and action taken to correct the defect.
[0154] At printing module 350, an effect-generating layer is printed within the window region(s) of the respective banknotes for optical cooperation with the applied light control layer. As discussed above, this effect-generating layer may typically be an image layer (e.g. for lenticular devices) or a colour shifting layer (e.g. for light control layers comprising prismatic microstructures). The effect-generating layer is typically applied to the opposing side of the substrate web to the side on which the light control layer was cast.
[0155] The substrate web is then re-wound at rewind module 360. The web may then be provided to a cutting machine for cutting into sheets. At this point, banknotes having light control layers that did not meet the predetermined quality threshold at inspection module 340 may be discarded. The sheets of “good” banknotes may then pass through further finishing machine(s) for application of print works (e.g. lithographic, intaglio and screen workings), numbering, varnishing and finally cutting into individual bank notes.
[0156]
[0157] As the sheets are conveyed along the machine direction, light control layers are formed on the banknotes within the lateral confines of the window regions by application module 410 and casting module 420 in the manner described above.
[0158] The sheets of polymer substrate, now comprising light control layers, are then conveyed through inspection module 430 where it is determined whether or not the cast light control layers meet a predetermined quality threshold. In the case where a defect is detected, the respective sheet may be marked for subsequent removal.
[0159] Printing module 440 then applies an effect-generating layer (e.g. image layer or colour shifting layer) to the opposing side of the substrate sheet in order to form the security device incorporated into the banknote.
[0160] Once the effect-generating layer has been applied by printing module 440, the sheets are collected at collection module 450. Sheets containing defects as determined at inspection module 430 (and marked or noted as such) are directed to a reject pile. The remaining “good” sheets may then be provided to further finishing machines for application of print works (e.g. lithographic, intaglio and screen workings), numbering, varnishing and finally cutting into individual bank notes.
[0161] In the example printing presses described above with reference to
[0162] An example printing press 7000 where the inspection takes place after the effect-generating layer has been applied is schematically shown in
[0163] The printing press 7000 is substantially identical to the press 3000 illustrated in
[0164] In
[0165] Sheets S of transparent substrate having a first side I and a second opposing side II are fed onto feeder table 1* where they are conventionally aligned before being fed to sheet transfer cylinder 900. The sheets are then fed in succession by the sheet transfer cylinder 900 to additional sheet transfer cylinder 900′ to in-line application module 750. In the printing press 4000, the application module 750 is a screen printing module and comprises a rotatory screen cylinder 820 inside which is provided a squeegee device 820a, which rotary screen cylinder 820 cooperates with an impression cylinder 840, serving as a counter-pressure cylinder, onto which the sheets S are fed in succession from the transfer cylinder 900 at the infeed. More precisely, the sheets are transferred in succession to the impression cylinder 840 which supports the second side II of the sheets S and the rotary screen cylinder 820 is brought into contact with the first side I of the sheets. In this context, the application module 750 is adapted to apply of layer of transparent curable material on a portion of the first side of the sheets (for instance on a window region formed on the substrate by opacifying layers).
[0166] Downstream of the impression cylinder 840, there is provided casting module 800 comprising at least one casting cylinder 8500, serving as an embossing tool, which cooperates with the first side I of the sheets S, i.e. the side where the layer of transparent curable material was applied by application module 750. In this example, the embossing tool carries a surface relief configured to form an array of microlenses in the curable material. A pressure roller or cylinder 860 is furthermore advantageously provided about the circumference of the casting cylinder 8500 in order to cooperate with the second side II of the sheets and press them against the circumference of the casting cylinder 8500. The casting module 800 further comprises UV/drying units 510, 550 to cure the curable material. An automatic washing device 880 is provided for cleaning the surface of the casting cylinder during maintenance operations.
[0167] The printing press 4000 further comprises printing module 700, comprising print cylinder 8000, plate cylinders 1800 and inking apparatuses 2800. The printing module 700 is configured to apply an effect-generating layer, in this example a fine line ink pattern for a lenticular device. The printing cylinder 8000 collects inks from the set of plate cylinders 1800 that are inked by the inking apparatus 2800. The printing module further comprises an automatic blanket washing device 740 adapted to clean the surface of the print cylinder 8000 during maintenance operations.
[0168] The embossing cylinder 8500 is arranged so as to act as counter-pressure cylinder for the print cylinder 8000 of the printing module 700. In other words, in-line casting of the light control layer 20 is performed from and on the first side I of the sheets S and the effect-generating layer is printed on the second side II of the sheets S, which sheets S are still being supported on the embossing cylinder 8500, i.e. without involving any sheet transfer between the in-line casting of the light control layer and the printing of the effect-generating layer. This is particularly advantageous in terms of achieving a high register between the microstructures of the light control layer and the associated effect-generating layer as the light control layer and the effect-generating layer are applied in the same step without involving any sheet transfer operation, i.e. substantially simultaneously.
[0169] A transfer cylinder 950 transfers the sheets S away from the printing and casting modules towards a further printing section of the press 4000, said further printing section labelled 4100. Further print workings may be provided, substantially simultaneously, to both sides I and II of the sheets S by further printing section 4100 at the nip between print rollers 4200 and 4250. Subsequent to the further print workings applied to the sheets S by print section 4100, the sheets are conveyed by sheet conveying system 960 (such as a chain gripper system with spaced-apart gripper bars) for delivery, for example, at a sheet delivery unit (not shown). Sheets containing light control layers not meeting the predetermined quality threshold may be sorted into a separate pile at the sheet delivery unit, for example.
[0170] after the further print workings have been applied. In both cases, the transparency of the window region within which the light control layer has been applied is sufficient for the beam of collimated light of the inspection module to pass through the window region and form the inspection light pattern. Alternatively, the inspection light pattern may be generated in reflection. Other possible locations of the inspection module within the printing press are envisaged.
[0171]
[0172] Processing of sheets S by printing press 5000 of
[0173]
[0174] It will be understood that the above examples of printing presses are exemplary only, and inspection according to the present invention may be used in or for any machine or press suitable for manufacturing security documents or articles comprising a transparent light control layer. In this way, the present invention allows for improved quality control inspection of light control layers during the manufacturing of security devices on security documents and security articles. In particular, the present invention has particular benefit in quality control during web-based and sheet-based manufacturing processes.
[0175] In the examples discussed above, the light control layer that is inspected by the inspection module is an integral part of a security device of the security article (e.g. security thread or foil) or security document (e.g. banknote) being manufactured. However, in alternative examples, the light control layer that is inspected may be separate to the light control layer for the final security device, as will be explained with reference to
[0176]
[0177] Here, the web 100 comprises a plurality of banknotes 102. The final banknotes 102 are designed to have a security device (comprising a light control layer) at a top left hand corner, as shown at A on banknote 102a. During manufacture, the light control layer formed at position A may then be subsequently inspected.
[0178] In some examples, a light control layer having the same structure as that of the final security device may be formed at a location laterally separate to the banknotes, for example on the edges of the web as illustrated at B. Such “test” light control layers may then be cut off and discarded when the web is cut into sheets or single banknotes.
[0179] As a further example, a “test” light control layer having a structure specifically designed to infer the quality of the casting process may be formed. Such a test light control layer would typically have a different structure to that of the final security device, although be formed by the same printing press. In this case the “test” light control layer may be applied laterally separate to the banknotes (e.g. position B) and subsequently discarded; or may be formed on the banknote itself laterally separate to the security device (e.g. positon C on banknote 102b) so as not to interfere with the optical effect exhibited by the security device. When formed on the banknote itself, the light control layer would be designed to not be noticeable to the end user.
[0180] Such a “test” light control layer having a different structure to that of the final security device may be used in two main circumstances. The first is when the light control layer of the final security device is complex in form — for example it may have multiple orientations, pitch and geometry meaning that the corresponding light pattern is complex (e.g. multiple spots in a complex arrangement) and difficult to compare against reference data at the speed of the web or sheet processing. In such a circumstance the “test” light control layer may have a simpler form (e.g. a single orientation) that allows for easier comparison of the inspection light pattern with the reference data. If the “test” light control layer meets the predetermined quality threshold, then it can be inferred that the light control layer of the final security device—formed by the same application and casting process—also meets the predetermined quality threshold. The “test” light control layer and the light control layer of the final security device are typically formed using the same casting tool, with the surface relief of the casting tool having laterally spaced regions for the test light control layer and the light control layer of the security devices.
[0181] A second circumstance is where it is desired to infer more information about the casting process than is possible from the light pattern obtained from the light control layer of the final security device. For example, if the light control layer of the final security device comprises a one dimensional array of microprisms, then the inspection light pattern will be in the form of a single line of spots (as in
[0182]
[0183] It is to be noted that in all examples described in
[0184]
[0185]
[0186] Within the window region 106, the security device 110 comprises a light control layer 20 in the form of a microlens array provided on one surface of the substrate 100, and an array of image elements 40 provided (e.g. printed) on the opposing surface and located substantially within the focal plane of the lens array. The microlenses and image element array cooperate with each other to generate an optically variable lenticular or moire effect to a viewer, as is known in the art. Security devices 110 exhibiting alternative optically variable effects may be used. For example, a colour shifting layer may be used in place of the microimage element array, and the light control layer may comprise an array of refractive microprisms rather than the microlenses depicted in
[0187] Laterally offset from the image element array is an inspection region 115 that is absent of any effect-generating elements. The inspection region 115 is located in a pre-defined region on the banknote, typically laterally adjacent the image element array (or other effect-generating region or layer where used). In other words, in this example the inspection region 115 is absent of any image elements 40. The microlens array 20 laterally extends so as to overlap with both the array of image elements 40 and the inspection region 115. The microlenses overlapping with the inspection region 115 form the test light control layer 20a (or test region of the light control layer 20). Typically, the test light control layer is formed in the same step as the light control layer of the security device 110.
[0188] When inspecting the light control layer 20 of the banknote (typically during manufacture), the inspection light pattern may be obtained by directing a laser beam towards the location of the test light control layer 20a. Consequently, the beam passes through the inspection region 115 to form an inspection light pattern with no interference from the image element array (although, as has been outline above, an inspection light pattern may still be obtained if the beam does pass through an effect generating layer). The quality of the light control layer of the security device 110 may be inferred from the result of the inspection of the test light control layer.
[0189] As has been discussed above, a laser beam used for inspection typically has a diameter in the range of 50 microns and 10 millimetres, preferably between 500 microns and 5 millimetres. Thus, the inspection region 115 (and test light control layer) typically has a dimension of at least 50 microns, preferably at least 500 microns. To provide a large target for the inspection beam during inspection of the light control layer, a preferred dimension of the inspection region 115 (and test light control layer) is greater than 3 mm and less than 10 mm, preferably between 3.5 mm and 5 mm.
[0190] In
[0191]
[0192] Although the examples of