GRAPHENE OXIDE (GO)-BASED COMPOSITE NANOPARTICLE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
20220402763 · 2022-12-22
Assignee
Inventors
- Ge Yang (Jining, CN)
- Ruixia Gao (Jining, CN)
- Chengchuan Che (Jining, CN)
- Jinfeng Liu (Jining, CN)
- Zhijin Gong (Jining, CN)
Cpc classification
B82Y5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
A61K47/34
HUMAN NECESSITIES
B82Y30/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B82Y40/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
A61K41/0052
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K47/36
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61P35/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
B82Y30/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B82Y40/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of biomedicine, and in particular relates to a graphene oxide (GO)-based composite nanoparticle drug delivery system for treating cervical cancer and a preparation method thereof. The composite nanoparticle drug delivery system includes an aptamer NH.sub.2-AS1411 (Aptamer NH2-AS1411, APT), monolayer graphene oxide (GO), chitosan oligosaccharide (CO) and γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA).
Claims
1. A graphene oxide-based composite nanoparticle drug delivery system, wherein raw materials for preparing the composite nanoparticle drug delivery system comprise: an aptamer NH.sub.2-AS1411, monolayer graphene oxide (GO), chitosan oligosaccharide (CO), γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA), 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NETS), a 2-morpholino ethanesulfonic acid buffer (MES buffer) and a phosphate buffer solution buffer (PBS buffer).
2. A method for preparing the graphene oxide-based composite nanoparticle drug delivery system according to claim 1, comprising: (1) dissolving monolayer GO in ultrapure water and pulverizing under sonication, and then centrifuging a resultant solution after the sonication to remove unexfoliated GO to obtain a GO suspension; (2) adjusting a pH value of the GO suspension to be within a range 5 to 6 with the MES buffer, and adding EDC and NETS in sequence to obtain a mixture; then sealing the mixture after sonication and placing on a shaker for reacting, followed by centrifuging to remove a supernatant to obtained a GO precipitate; (3) dissolving CO in the PBS buffer under sonication to obtain a CO solution; resuspending the GO precipitate with the CO solution, adjusting a pH value of a resultant mixed suspension to be within a range of 7.2 to 7.5 with the PBS buffer, then sealing after sonication and placing on a shaker for reacting; subsequently, centrifuging and washing a resultant reaction solution and then dialyzing to obtain GO-CO; (4) dissolving γ-PGA in ultrapure water to obtain an aqueous γ-PGA solution; adjusting a pH value of the aqueous γ-PGA solution to be within a range of 5 to 6 with the MES buffer, adding EDC and NETS, and then sealing after sonication and placing on a shaker for reacting to obtain a γ-PGA solution; (5) dissolving GO-CO in ultrapure water to obtain a GO-CO solution after sonication; adding the activated γ-PGA solution to the GO-CO solution, adjusting a pH value of a resultant mixed solution to be within a range of 7.2 to 7.5 with the PBS buffer, and then sealing after sonication and placing on a shaker for reacting; thereafter, centrifuging and washing a resultant reaction solution, followed by dialyzing and freeze-drying to obtain a GO-CO-γ-PGA powder; and (6) adding GO-CO-γ-PGA to a 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 0.1M KCl and dissolving under sonication to obtain a GO-CO-γ-PGA solution; adding EDC and NHS in sequence, placing on a shaker after sonication for activation, and then adding NH.sub.2-AS1411 for reacting, followed by centrifuging, washing and dialyzing to obtain APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (1), a concentration of GO in ultrapure water is 4 mg/mL; the pulverization under sonication is conducted at a power of 598 W for 1 h; the centrifugation is conducted at 8,000 r/min for 40 min.
4. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (2), a concentration of EDC in the GO suspension is 8 mg/mL; a mass ratio of EDC to NHS is 2:3; the reaction is conducted at 37° C. for 15 min; the centrifugation is conducted at 12,000 r/min for 10 min.
5. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (3), a concentration of the CO solution is 20 mg/mL; a mass ratio of CO to GO is 5:1; the reaction is conducted at 37° C. for 10 h.
6. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (4), the aqueous γ-PGA solution has a concentration of 2 mg/mL; a mass ratio of γ-PGA to EDC is 5:48; a mass ratio of EDC to NHS is 8:5; the reaction is conducted at 37° C. for 15 min.
7. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (5), a concentration of the GO-CO solution is 4 mg/mL; a mass ratio of GO-CO to γ-PGA is 2:1; the reaction is conducted at 37° C. for 10 h.
8. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step (6), the GO-CO-γ-PGA solution has a concentration of 1 mg/mL; the Tris-HCl buffer has a pH value of 7.4; a mass ratio of GO-CO-γ-PGA to EDC is 5:212; a mass ratio of EDC to NHS is 106:159; the activation is conducted at 37° C. for 15 min; a concentration of NH.sub.2-AS1411 is 100 μM; a ratio of GO-CO-γ-PGA to NH.sub.2-AS1411 is 1 mg:1 mL; the reaction is conducted for 10 h to 12 h.
9. Use of the graphene oxide-based composite nanoparticle drug delivery system according to claim 1 in loading with doxorubicin (DOX) to prepare a drug for cervical cancer and to act as a photothermal agent for tumor ablation, wherein when the composite nanoparticle drug delivery system is used to prepare the drug for cervical cancer for application, an intensity of a near-infrared laser irradiation at 808 nm required is 2 W/cm.sup.2.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
[0031]
[0032]
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0040] The technical solutions of the present disclosure are further explained and illustrated below by way of specific examples.
Example 1
[0041] (1) 80 mg of monolayer GO was dissolved in 20 mL of ultrapure water and pulverized with an ultrasonic cell disruptor at 598 W for 1 h.
[0042] (2) The solution obtained after sonication was centrifuged at a speed of 8,000 r/min for 40 min to remove unexfoliated GO to obtain a GO suspension.
[0043] (3) 20 mL (4 mg/mL) of the GO suspension was adjusted to a pH value within a range of 5-6 with a MES buffer, 160 mg of EDC and 240 mg of NHS were added in sequence, and the mixture obtained was sonicated for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixture was sealed and placed on a shaker for reacting at 37° C. for 15 min. The reaction solution thus obtained was centrifuged in a centrifuge at 12,000 r/min for 10 min and a supernatant was removed.
[0044] (4) 400 mg of CO was dissolved in 20 mL of a PBS buffer, followed by sonication for 10 min for a full dissolution.
[0045] (5) The GO precipitate obtained above was resuspended with the CO solution. The mixed suspension was adjusted to a pH value within a range of 7.2 to 7.5 with a PBS buffer, followed by sonication for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixed suspension was sealed and placed on a shaker for reacting at 37° C. for 10 h. Thereafter, the reaction solution thus obtained was centrifuged and washed, and was dialyzed with a dialysis bag (Mw=8-14 KDa) for 2 d.
[0046] (6) 20 mg of γ-PGA was dissolved in 10 mL of ultrapure water and then adjusted to a pH value within a range of 5 to 6 with a MES buffer. 192 mg of EDC and 120 mg of NHS were added, followed by sonication for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixed solution obtained was sealed and placed on a shaker for reacting at 37° C. for 15 min.
[0047] (7) 40 mg of GO-CO obtained above was dissolved in 10 mL of ultrapure water, followed by sonication for 10 min. The activated γ-PGA solution was added to the GO-CO solution and adjusted to a pH value within a range of 7.2 to 7.5 with a PBS buffer, followed by sonication for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixed solution thus obtained was sealed and placed on a shaker for reacting at 37° C. for 10 h. Thereafter, the reaction solution obtained was centrifuged and washed, and dialyzed with a dialysis bag (Mw=8-14 KDa) for 2 d, followed by freeze-drying to obtain a GO-CO-γ-PGA powder.
[0048] (8) 10 mg of GO-CO-γ-PGA was dissolved in 10 mL of a 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 M KCl under sonication, 424 mg of EDC and 636 mg of NHS were then added in sequence, followed by sonication for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixed solution thus obtained was placed on a shaker for activating at 37° C. for 15 min. 10 μL of NH.sub.2-AS1411 (100 μM) was added thereto for reacting for 10 h to 12 h. Thereafter, the reaction solution obtained was centrifuged and washed, and was dialyzed with a dialysis bag (Mw=8-14 KDa) for 2 d to obtain an APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA solution.
[0049] (9) 10 mL of a DOX solution with a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL was added to the APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA solution above, and the mixture obtained was allowed to react under stirring for 24 h at room temperature in the dark. The unloaded drugs were removed by centrifugation on a high-speed centrifuge.
[0050] Results and Discussion:
[0051] 1. The photothermal effects of the nano-system were studied as to the temperature changes with different materials, different concentrations of APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA and different powers of laser irradiation at 808 nm at the same concentration. It may be seen from
[0052] 2. To study the photothermal efficacy of the drug-loading nanocomposites in vitro, a blank group, a nanoparticle carrier group, a free drug group, a drug-loading nanoparticle group and a corresponding photothermal group were set according to experimental needs. 100 μL of a cell suspension was added to each well of a sterile 96-well plate, and then incubated in an incubator at 37° C. for 24 h. Different concentrations of APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA and APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX were added thereto, respectively, and incubated in an incubator at 37° C. for another 24 h. The photothermal group was subjected to a near-infrared irradiation at 808 nm (2 W/cm.sup.2, 5 min) after incubation for 3 h. The cell viability was detected by an MTT assay. It may be seen from
[0053] 3. Establishment of models of heteroplastic tumors in nude mice with human cervical cancer cells Hela
[0054] 15 female 3-week-old BALB/c SPF-grade nude mice were injected with human cervical cancer cells Hela in a cell injection dose of 5×10.sup.7 cells/mouse. The cells were passaged to ensure that all the injected cells were in a logarithmic growth phase in desirable condition, and washed with PBS, digested with trypsin and collected by centrifugation. The concentration of the cells was adjusted to about 5×10.sup.7 cells/mL with saline, and 0.2 mL of a cell suspension was injected subcutaneously into the left anterior axilla of each nude mouse with a syringe. Visible tumor growth occurred 3 d after inoculation; after 7 d, all 15 mice developed tumors with a solid tumor volume of about 50 mm.sup.3 and a final tumor formation rate of 100%. After the tumor volume of the nude mice reached 100 mm.sup.3, drug administration was started. The nude mice were randomly divided into a saline negative control group, a free DOX group, a GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX group, an APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX group and an APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX-NIR group, with 3 mice in each group. The nude mice were labeled with picric acid and weighed, and was administered once every 3 d with a dose of DOX at 5 mg/kg.
[0055] Control group: saline, Cage 1: DOX, Cage 2: GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX, Cage 3: APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX and Cage 4: APT-GO-CO-γ-PGA-DOX-NIR, all of which were subjected to 808 nm irradiation at 2 W/cm.sup.2 for 5 min.
[0056] It may be seen from
[0057] 4. Tracking record of growth and development of nude mice: during drug administration, the body weight, diet, water drinking and body temperature of the nude mice were observed and recorded every day; the diameter and short diameter of the tumors were measured every day to calculate the tumor volumes of the nude mice so as to plot the relative tumor volume curve. As shown in
[0058] 5. Hemolytic toxicity experiment: an extract liquor of a target to be tested was prepared following the national standard GB/T16886.5-2011, and a hemolysis rate less than 5% indicates that the target met the requirements for hemolysis of medical materials. In the experiment, saline was used in the negative control group, sterilized double-distilled water was used in the positive control group, and free DOX and drug-loading nanocomposites were used in the experimental groups, respectively. 200 μL of an erythrocyte suspension of nude mouse was added to different groups and placed in a cell incubator at 37° C. for 2 h; then a mixed solution of each group was pipetted and centrifuged at 2,500 r/min for 5 min; 100 μL of a supernatant from each group was gently pipetted to a 96-well plate, and an absorbance value of each well at 540 nm was detected using a multifunctional microplate reader. The calculation formula of the hemolysis rate was as follows:
Hemolysis rate (HR) %=(Absorbance of experimental group−Absorbance of negative control group)/(Absorbance of positive control group−Absorbance of negative control group)×100%
[0059] It may be seen from
[0060] 6. In vivo drug distribution and anti-tumor effect: in vivo imaging was conducted at 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 18 h and 24 h after drug injection to observe the distribution and accumulation of DOX in vivo.
[0061] 7. H&E staining: on the 21st day, 2 h after administration, the nude mice were sacrificed by neck dislocation, then the tumor, heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney of the nude mice were collected via dissection, and the tumor volume was measured to calculate a tumor inhibition rate.
[0062] When the intensity of the near-infrared laser is reduced (808 nm, 1 W/cm.sup.2), the synergistic effect of photothermal therapy and chemotherapy is not obviously observed. When the intensity of the near-infrared laser is increased (808 nm, 3 W/cm.sup.2), great damages are caused to the skin of the nude mice.