CATALYST INTENDED FOR DESULFURIZATION/DEMERCAPTANIZATION/DEHYDRATION OF GASEOUS HYDROCARBONS
20190184383 ยท 2019-06-20
Inventors
- Liudmila Aleksandrovna Tyurina (Moscow, RU)
- Alexander Ivanovich Tyurin (Moscow, RU)
- Irina Gennadievna Tarkhanova (Moscow, RU)
- Alexey Aleksandrovich Tyurin (Moscow, RU)
Cpc classification
B01J31/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J27/128
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2252/2023
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J31/0247
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J31/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J27/32
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01D2257/306
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J31/181
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J2231/70
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C07C7/11
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J31/1805
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
C07C7/11
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J31/16
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J27/32
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01J31/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C07C7/148
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B01J27/128
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
This application is in the field of technologies for desulfurization and demercaptanization of raw gaseous hydrocarbons (including natural gas, tail gas, technological gas, etc., including gaseous media). It can be used for simultaneous dehydration and desulfurization/demercaptanization of any kind of raw gaseous hydrocarbons.
Claims
1. A catalyst for desulfurization/demercaptanization of gaseous hydrocarbons, comprising a solution of ferric or cupric chlorides with an addition of at least one solvating agent in at least one nonaqueous solvent.
2. The catalyst of claim 1, wherein the solvating agent is amide.
3. The catalyst of claim 2, wherein the solvent further comprising hydrocarbon.
4. The catalyst of claim 3, wherein the solvating agent further comprising amine.
5. The catalyst of claim 4, wherein the solvent further comprising hydrocarbon.
6. The catalyst of claim 5, wherein the solvating agent further comprising alcohol or glycol.
7. The catalyst of claim 3, wherein the solvent is hydrocarbon.
8. A catalyst for desulfurization/demercaptanization of gaseous hydrocarbons, comprising a solution of ferric and cupric chlorides with an addition of solvating agents in nonaqueous solvents.
9. The catalyst of claim 8, wherein the solvating agent is amide.
10. The catalyst of claim 9, wherein the solvent further comprising hydrocarbon.
11. The catalyst of claim 9, wherein the solvating agent further comprising amine.
12. The catalyst of claim 11, wherein the solvent further comprising hydrocarbon.
13. The catalyst of claim 12, wherein the solvating agent further comprising alcohol or glycol.
14. The catalyst of claim 8, wherein the solvent is hydrocarbon.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0037]
[0038]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0039] As an agitator of oxygen-containing gas discharge, an air compressor can be used, as an agitator of catalyst solution supply from the tanka metering pump, and as an agitator of catalyst solution recycling from sulfur-separating unita regular pump can be used.
[0040] Below, the essence and advantages of the developed technical solution are discussed in examples of practical implementation.
EXAMPLE 1
[0041] Synthesis of catalyst C1. Into a retort, at a room temperature, 50 ml of ethyl alcohol, 100 ml of octane, 0.2-10 g of CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O and 0.5-50 g of benzylamine are put. The contents of the retort are mixed until cupric chloride dissolves completely.
EXAMPLE 2
[0042] Synthesis of catalyst C2. Into a retort, at a room temperature, 50 ml of ethyl alcohol, 100 ml of octane, 0.2-10 g of CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O and 0.5-50 g of cyclohexamine are put. The contents of the retort are mixed until cupric chloride dissolves completely.
EXAMPLE 3
[0043] Synthesis of catalyst C3. Into a retort, at a room temperature, 50 ml of ethyl alcohol, 100 ml of octane, 0.2-10 g of CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O and 0.5-50 g of pyridine are put. The contents of the retort are mixed until cupric chloride dissolves completely.
EXAMPLE 4
[0044] Synthesis of catalyst C4. Into a retort, at a room temperature, 50 ml of ethyl alcohol, 20 ml of water, 0.2-60 g of dimethylformamide (DMFA), and 0.2-10 g of CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O are put. The contents of the flask are mixed by means of a magnetic mixer until cupric chloride dissolves completely.
EXAMPLE 5
[0045] Synthesis of catalyst C5. Into a retort, at a room temperature, 50 ml of alcohol as solvent, 0.2-60 g of mixture of amine (cyclohexamine, pyridine) with dimethylformamide (DMFA) as solvating agents, 0.2-10 g of CuCl.sub.2.2H.sub.2O are put. The contents of the flask are mixed until cupric chloride dissolves completely.
[0046] Similarly catalyst C5 was synthesized with other solvating agents and in other solvents.
EXAMPLES 6-40
[0047] Gas purification using catalysts C1-C5. The reactor is loaded with glycol and one of the catalysts C1-C5 synthesized as in examples 1-5, respectively. The gas supplied into the reactor contains 1%-2.2% vol. of hydrogen sulfide, 0.05% of mercaptan sulfur and 0.5025%-1.125% vol. of oxygen. The gas pressure is 2.5-60 kgf/cm.sup.2. The solution temperature is 25-40 C. The output gas contains, according to potentiometric titration results, 0.001 ppm-70 ppm of hydrogen sulfide and mercaptan.
[0048] The rate of hydrogen sulfide removal is 99.6%-99.99999%, the rate of mercaptan removal is up to 99.998%. The rate of dehydration is determined by the gas pressure. The higher the gas pressure is, the lower amount of water remains in the output gas.
[0049] Experimental data on hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan and water contents after desulfurization/demercaptanization/dehydration of the gas using catalyst C1 is given in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 [H.sub.2S] [RSH] Example T, Input, Output, Input, Output, [H.sub.2O], g/m.sup.3 No C. % vol. ppm % vol. ppm Input Output Gas pressure 6 kgf/cm.sup.2 6 25 1.5 40 0.05 50 3.584 0.424 7 40 1.5 60 0.05 60 8.284 0.939 Gas pressure 25 kgf/cm.sup.2 8 25 1.5 45 0.05 60 1.069 0.135 9 40 1.5 45 0.05 60 2.425 0.291
[0050] Experimental data on hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan and water contents after desulfurization/demercaptanization/dehydration of the gas using catalyst C2 at temperature 25-40 C. and under different conditions is given in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 [H.sub.2S] [RSH] Example T, Input, Output, Input, Output, [H.sub.2O], g/m.sup.3 No C. % vol. ppm % vol. ppm Input Output Gas pressure 6 kgf/cm.sup.2 10 25 1.5 40 0.05 50 3.584 0.424 11 40 1.5 50 0.05 60 8.284 0.939 Gas pressure 25 kgf/cm.sup.2 12 25 1.5 45 0.05 60 1.069 0.135 13 40 1.5 45 0.05 60 2.425 0.291
[0051] Experimental data given in Tables 1 and 2 show that the proposed device and process is capable of achieving the stated technical result even if the catalyst composition used is not optimal.
[0052] Experimental data on hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan and water contents after desulfurization/demercaptanization/dehydration of the gas using catalysts C1, C2, C3 at temperature 25-40 C. and under different conditions is given in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 [H.sub.2S] [RSH] Example T, Input, Output, Input, Output, [H.sub.2O], g/m3 No C. % vol. ppm % vol. ppm Input Output Gas pressure 6 kgf/cm.sup.2 14 25 1.5 50 0.05 60 3.584 0.424 15 40 1.5 60 0.05 70 8.284 0.939 Gas pressure 25 kgf/cm.sup.2 16 25 1.5 45 0.05 60 1.069 0.135 17 40 1.5 45 0.05 60 2.425 0.291
[0053] Experimental data on hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan and water contents after desulfurization/demercaptanization/dehydration of the gas using catalyst C4 at temperature 25-40 C. and under different pressure is given in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 [H.sub.2S] [RSH] Example T, Input, Output, Input, Output, [H.sub.2O], g/m3 No C. % vol. ppm % vol. ppm Input Output Gas pressure 6 kgf/cm.sup.2 18 25 1.5 40 0.05 50 3.584 0.424 19 40 1.5 45 0.05 50 8.284 0.939 Gas pressure 25 kgf/cm.sup.2 20 25 1.5 40 0.05 60 1.069 0.135 21 40 1.5 40 0.05 60 2.425 0.291
[0054] Experimental data on hydrogen sulfide, mercaptan and water (g/m.sup.3 and T.sub.dew point, C., water dew point temperature at P=3.92 MPa) contents after desulfurization/demercaptanization/dehydration of the gas using catalyst C5 at temperature 25-40 C. and under different pressure is given in Table 5.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 [H.sub.2S] Input, [RSH] [H.sub.2O] in output Example T, % Output, Input, Output, T.sub.dew point, No C. vol. ppm % vol. ppm g/m.sup.3 C. Gas pressure 2.5 kgf/cm.sup.2 22 25 1.5 4 0.05 5 0.817 27 Gas pressure 6 kgf/cm.sup.2 23 25 1.5 4 0.05 5 0.424 15.0 24 40 1.8 7 0.05 7 0.939 29.0 Gas pressure 25 kgf/cm.sup.2 25 25 1.5 0.001 0.05 0.01 0.135 2.0 26 40 2.2 2 0.05 4 0.291 9.0 Gas pressure 60 kgf/cm.sup.2 27 25 2.2 0.001 0.05 0.01 0.074 10.0
[0055] Hydrogen sulfide and mercaptan conversion in Examples 6-27 is given in Table 6.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Example No Conversion, % 6 7 8 9 22 23 24 25 26 27 H.sub.2S 99.7 99.6 99.7 99.7 99.97 99.97 99.96 99.9999 99.991 99.9999 RSH 90.0 90.0 88.0 88.0 99.0 99.0 98.6 99.998 99.2 99.998
[0056] The examples provided show efficiency of the proposed device and process of hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans conversion. The amount of remaining water after dehydration therein is determined by process pressure and temperature, as is demonstrated in Tables 1-5. Under pressure 60 kgf/cm.sup.2 the water content in the gas is reduced to 0.074 g/m.sup.3, that corresponds to water dew point of 10 C.
[0057] Table 7 shows the results of gas purification by means of the proposed device and process with different concentration of catalyst C5. The conditions of the experiment are similar to those of experiments No. 6 -27, temperature is 25 C.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 [C5], [H.sub.2S] [RSH] [H.sub.2O] in output % P, Input, Output, Input, Output, T.sub.dew point, vol. kgf/cm.sup.2 % vol. ppm % vol. ppm g/m.sup.3 C. 0.005 6 1 10 0.1 10 0.42 15 0.005 25 1 10 0.1 10 0.14 2 0.3 60 1 10 0.1 10 0.07 10
[0058] Table 8 shows results of purification and dehydration of gas having different hydrocarbon composition, with different contents of methane, C1, ethane, C2, and C.sub.3+ by proposed device and process, using catalyst K5. The conditions of experiments are similar to those of experiments No. 6 -27.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 [H.sub.2O], in [H.sub.2S] [RSH] output Content, % vol. P, Input, Output, Input, Output, T.sub.dew point, C.sub.1 C.sub.2 C.sub.3+ kgf/cm.sup.2 % vol. ppm % vol. ppm g/m.sup.3 C. 85 12 3 6 1 10 0.1 10 0.42 15 74 22 4 25 1 10 0.1 10 0.14 2 100 25 1 10 0.1 10 0.14 2 95 5 60 1 4 0.1 5 0.07 10
[0059] Table 9 shows results of purification by means of catalyst C5 with various solvating agents and in various solvents. The conditions of experiments are similar to those of experiments No. 6-27.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Content [H.sub.2S] [RSH] (Cu + in, in, Catalyst.sup.s solvating Fe), % out, % out, No (s = solvent) agents %* vol. ppm vol ppm 28 C5.sup.1,6,7 Amine + amide 0.001 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.01 29 C5.sup.2 Amine + amide 0.01 1.0 0.001 0.5 0.01 30 C5.sup.3 Amine + alcohol 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.03 31 C5.sup.1,7 Amide 1.5 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.03 32 C5.sup.1,7 Amide + alcohol 20 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.01 33 C5.sup.4 Amide + glycol 0.1 1.0 0.001 0.5 0.01 34 C5.sup.1,5 Amine + amide + 1.5 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.01 glycol 35 C5.sup.2,3 Amine + amide 2.7 0.1 0.001 0.1 0.01 36 C5.sup.1,4 Amine + amide 12.0 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.01 37 C5.sup.1,3,5 Amine + alcohol 25.1 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.01 38 C5.sup.2,5 Amine + amide 41.3 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.01 39 C5.sup.1,2,5 Amine + amide 80.7 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.1 40 C5.sup.1,7 Amine + alcohol 90.2 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.1 41 C5.sup.1,2,5 Amine + amide 99.9 1.0 0.01 0.5 0.01 42 C5.sup.1,7 Amine + alcohol 99.9 0.1 0.01 0.1 0.001
solvent: [0060] .sup.1alcohol; .sup.2glycol; .sup.3mixture of alcohol and/or glycol with amine, etc.; .sup.4DMFA or amine or amide; .sup.5dimethylsulfoxide; .sup.6alcohol+hydrocarbon; .sup.7glycol+hydrocarbon [0061] *solvating agent up to 100%
[0062] The examples provided confirm achievement of the stated technical result, yet they do not show the limits of proposed technical solution.
[0063] It will be understood that the system and method may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or central characteristics thereof. The present examples and embodiments, therefore, are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, and the system method is not to be limited to the details given herein.