Elongated Component for a Manufacturing Machine of a Fibrous Cellulosic Web, Its Use and Method for Recycling
20220403596 · 2022-12-22
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
An elongated planar or profiled component for a manufacturing machine of a fibrous cellulosic web, such as paper, board or tissue web, is at least partially formed from a composite material having a continuous polymer matrix, and reinforcing inorganic fibers embedded in the continuous polymer matrix. The continuous polymer matrix is biodegradable and the reinforcing inorganic fibers are biodegradable glass fibers. A method is disclosed for recycling elongated planar and/or profiled components used for manufacture of a fibrous web.
Claims
1. A component for a fibrous cellulose web manufacturing machine, wherein the component is elongated and planar or profiled, the component comprising: a continuous polymer matrix, and reinforcing inorganic fibers embedded in the continuous polymer matrix, wherein the continuous polymer matrix is biodegradable and the reinforcing inorganic fibers are biodegradable glass fibers.
2. The component of claim 1 wherein the continuous polymer matrix is comprised of at least one of polylactic acid; polycaprolactone; a polyhydroxyalkanoate, polyhydroxybutyrate; poly(alkylene succinate), and poly(butylene succinate).
3. The component of claim 2 wherein the continuous polymer matrix is comprised of a mixture of at least two of: polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polyhydroxyalkanoate, polyhydroxybutyrate, poly(alkylene succinate), and poly(butylene succinate).
4. The component of claim 1 wherein the inorganic fibers are biodegradable glass fibers comprising: 60-75 weight-% of SiO.sub.2; 5-20 weight-% of Na.sub.2O; 5-25 weight-% of CaO; 0-10 weight-% of MgO; 0.5-5 weight-% of P.sub.2O.sub.5; 0-15 weight-% of B.sub.2O.sub.3; 0-20 weight-% of K2O; 0-4 weight-% of SrO; and 0-1 weight-% of Li.sub.2O.
5. The component of claim 4 wherein the inorganic fibers are biodegradable glass fibers comprising: 65-70 weight-% of SiO.sub.2; 12-17 weight-% of Na.sub.2O; 8-11 weight-%, of CaO; 3-7 weight-%, of MgO; 0.5-2.5 weight-%, of P.sub.2O.sub.5; 1-4 weight-%, of B.sub.2O.sub.3; 0.5-4 weight-%, of K.sub.2O; 0-4 weight-% of SrO; and 0-1 weight-% of Li.sub.2O.
6. The component of claim 1 wherein the composite material further comprises mineral filler particles embedded in the continuous polymer matrix.
7. The component of claim 1 wherein the composite material comprises: 50-80 weight-% of polymer matrix; 10-50 weight-% of inorganic fibers; and 0-30 weight-% of mineral filler particles.
8. The component of claim 7 wherein the composite material comprises: 60-70 weight-% of polymer matrix; 10-30 weight-% of inorganic fibers; and 0.1-30 weight-% of mineral filler particles.
9. The component of claim 1 wherein the component is selected from the group consisting of: doctor blades, headbox sheets, headbox wedges, suction roll sealings and suction box covers, which are used in a wet-end section in the manufacture of paper, board or tissue.
10. The component of claim 1 wherein the component is a doctor blade having a blade thickness in a range of 1-4 mm.
11. The component of claim 10 wherein the component is a doctor blade having a blade thickness in a range of 2-3 mm.
12. The component of claim 1 wherein the component is selected from the group consisting of: rod beds, rod bed parts, foil blades, dewatering elements, foil lists, and holder parts for doctoring equipment.
13. The component of claim 1 wherein the inorganic fibers are chopped biodegradable glass fibers, which have a fiber length of 0.5-3 mm.
14. The component of claim 13 wherein the biodegradable glass fibers are randomly and uniformly embedded in the continuous polymer matrix.
15. The component of claim 1 wherein the inorganic fibers are continuous biodegradable glass fibers forming at least one woven structure embedded in the continuous polymer matrix.
16. The component of claim 1 wherein the composite material has a property selected from the group consisting of: a heat deflection temperature of ≥85° C. determined according to standard ISO 75 method A; a value for tensile strength at break of at least 50 MPa determined according to standard ISO 527; a tensile modulus value of at least 7500 MPa determined according to standard ISO 527; a distortion value ≤0.3 mm/m; and a flexural modulus value of at least 7300 MPa determined according to standard ISO 178.
17. A method of manufacture of a fibrous cellulosic web, comprising: on a web manufacturing machine employing at least one component which is elongated and planar or profiled; and wherein the at least one component has a biodegradable continuous polymer matrix and reinforcing inorganic fibers of biodegradable glass fibers embedded in the continuous polymer matrix.
18. A method for recycling first components of a fibrous cellulose web manufacturing machine, and making second components for a fibrous cellulose web manufacturing machine, comprising: collecting the first components which are at least partially formed from a a biodegradable polymer(s) and biodegradable glass fibers; processing the first components to form a starting composite material comprised of biodegradable polymers(s) and biodegradable glass fibers; and forming from the starting composite material second components which are elongated planar and/or profiled, the second components suitable for use in the manufacture of fibrous cellulosic webs and comprising the biodegradable glass fibers embedded in the biodegradable polymer matrix.
19. The method of claim 18 characterised in that the processing of the first components to form a starting composite material comprises the steps of washing and comminuting the collected first components into composite particles for the starting composite material.
20. The method according to claim 19 wherein the first components have a first set of mechanical properties, and the second components have a second set of mechanical properties, and wherein the said first components have higher mechanical properties than the said second components.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0063] In
[0064] In
[0065] In
[0066]
EXPERIMENTAL
[0067] Some embodiments of the invention are described in the following non-limiting experiments.
[0068] Blade samples according to the invention were compared with blades made of materials typically used in prior art doctor blades. Blade samples of 5 different material compositions A-E were made as follows.
[0069] Sample A (Comparative example): UHMW-PE—unreinforced, a piece of a commercial doctor blade;
[0070] Sample B: 70 weight-% of biodegradable resin (matrix), reinforced with 30 weight-% of chopped biodegradable glass fibers;
[0071] Sample C (Comparative example): 70 weight-% of biodegradable resin (matrix) and 30 weight-% of mineral filler;
[0072] Sample D (Comparative example): epoxy resin matrix, reinforced by non-biodegradable E-glass fiber, a piece of a commercial doctor blade
[0073] Sample E: 60 weight-% of biodegradable resin (matrix), reinforced with 10 weight-% of chopped biodegradable glass fibers and 30 weight-% of mineral filler particles.
[0074] The length and width of each blade sample A to E was identical, 75 mm×20 mm, with blade stick-out of 40 mm simulating true operation of a doctor blade while in its holder. The tip of the blades was bevelled to provide maximum sharpness and cleaning effect.
Experiment 1
[0075] Test equipment comprised of a PU-covered test roll, i.e., a Polyurethane covered roll, of Shore hardness 10.6 P&J. The roll was rotated with a speed of 1000 m/min. Samples A-D were tested simultaneously by holding each sample by its holder in a contact against the roll surface with a blade angle 25° and line pressure 180 N/m. Water lubrication on the roll surface was provided by a water shower. The roll was rotated for 2 weeks after which the samples were removed. The blades were visually inspected of their wear and of keeping the tip sharpness/bevel shape. Also, the surface of the roll was visually inspected for any damage or if traces or residuals of the blade material was left on the surface. Results are shown in Table 1 below.
[0076] Experiment 2
[0077] In Experiment 2 Sample B according to the invention and the comparative Sample C were tested for their applicability for recycling as a raw material for manufacturing of new products. The samples B and C were compared for maintaining their mechanical properties after exposure to wet conditions for several weeks. The Shore D hardness, ISO 178 flexural strength and flexural modulus of samples were measured before and after immersing in 40° C. water for 4 weeks. Results are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Results of Experiments 1 and 2 Flexural Flexural Roll Shore D strength Modulus Blade surface Hardness [MPa] [MPa] thickness Blade Blade quality, before/ before/ before/ Sample [mm] wear sharpness residuals after after after A (Ref.) 5 major major some — — — loss B 4 none/ kept no 74/72 131/72 7520/5340 minor C (Ref.) 4 none/ kept no 77/73 99/65 6130/4560 minor D (Ref.) 2 none/ kept no — — — minor
Experiment 3
[0078] Samples and test arrangement were the same as in Experiment 1. The focus was on optimizing blade thickness further in order to minimise the material usage. The comparative samples A and D had a thickness that is typically used in commercial blades made of that material, but the blade thickness of samples B, C and E was varied. Doctoring performance was monitored by inspecting the ability of the sample to keep the roll surface dry of the water as blade wear and warp both result in failure to keep the roll surface dry. Blade warp or bend was visually compared to that of the non-biodegradable glass fiber blade (comparative sample D). Blade wear and roll surface quality were inspected as in Experiment 1. Results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Results of Experiment 3. Blade Doctoring Roll surface thickness failed after/ Blade quality, Sample [mm] days Blade wear warp residuals A (Ref.) 5 3 major — some B 3 >14 none/minor no no B 2 >14 none/minor no no C (Ref.) 3 6 non-acceptable yes some C (Ref.) 2 3 non-acceptable yes some D (Ref.) 2 >14 none/minor no no (but roll surface fine- grooved) E 3 >14 none/minor no no E 2 12 none/minor yes no
[0079] It can be seen from results in Table 2 blades according to the invention have competitive properties compared with the conventional blades of the prior art.
[0080] Sufficient stiffness properties were achieved with optimized thickness. A low thickness was desired not only in order to reduce the amount of material and thus the amount of waste but also for improved doctoring performance. The thin blade according to the invention is less prone to lose its bevelled tip and thus less prone to hydroplaning or floating. It keeps a good contact with the surface to be doctored and still without damaging the roll surface or leaving rubbed residuals on the surface during contact.
[0081] Despite its biodegradable nature the composite material used in the blades of the invention maintains certain mechanical properties that are important in terms of recycling as a raw material. Especially surface hardness is maintained after exposure to water and wet conditions. Strength properties are decreased but not too much for not being applicable to a second round as raw material, especially for a component with less demanding requirements. For material used in Samples B and C it has been found that a drop in mechanical properties is remarkable only after the second or third melting. Comparative Sample C with mineral filler but without biodegradable glass fiber reinforcement performed acceptably with a blade thickness of 4 mm (Table 1) but when the blade thickness was reduced to 3 or 2 mm, it failed (Table 2). Inventive Samples B (with biodegradable glass fiber, without mineral filler) and E (with mineral filler and biodegradable glass fibers in proportion of 3:1) achieved a good performance level even with blade thickness of 2 mm, as seen from Table 2. Thus, it was concluded that the presence of biodegradable glass fibers is advantageous in doctor blades. Samples B and E according to the invention even seemed to exceed the prior art Sample D in terms of maintaining roll surface quality during doctoring.
[0082] Even if the invention was described with reference to what at present seems to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is appreciated that the invention shall not be limited to the embodiments described above, but the invention is intended to cover also different modifications and equivalent technical solutions within the scope of the enclosed claims.