SELF-PROPELLED INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE, DEVICE, OR ATTACHMENT WITH WORK OPTIMIZING CONTROLLER, METHOD OF OPERATION, AND CONTROLLER
20220403625 · 2022-12-22
Inventors
Cpc classification
E02F3/3414
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02F9/2203
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02F9/265
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E02F9/2246
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
Abstract
A method, an apparatus, an attachment, a kit for an attachment, a vehicle and a controller for controlling the velocity of a processing machine or attachment so as to maximize the efficiency of a working tool in processing material. A vehicle or machine or industrial device frame having one or more power system providing power to an attachment processing machine. With one or more sensors sensing an input representing at least the power provided the attachment. An at least one controller adapted to calculate the work done at the attachment based on the power provided the attachment and maintaining the power to a stored or programmed efficient target value based in part on the adjustment of the feed rate of the work piece or work surface to the attachment or similar input or inputs.
Claims
1. A skid steer loader having a planar attachment coupled thereto, comprising: a skid steer loader frame; an attachment frame; a skid steer loader drive engine powering the skid steer loader and providing a forward velocity for the skid steer loader; an at least one hydraulic system having an at least one hydraulic motor powered by the drive engine and powering the attachment; an at least one hydraulic manifold coupled to the at least one hydraulic system with an at least one attachment hydraulic line powering an at least one attachment hydraulic motor powering the working element of the attachment; an at least one sensor sensing an at least one input in the at least one hydraulic line powering the at least one attachment hydraulic motor; and a controller, wherein the controller is adapted to receive the sensed at least one input from the at least one sensor and correlate the at least one input to the work being done at the attachment and to maintain the at least one input in an optimum range and thereby optimize the work output of the attachment upon a work surface.
2. The loader of claim 1, wherein controller adjusts the work being done at the attachment by adjusting the forward velocity of the skid steer loader and thereby the feed rate of material to the attachment.
3. The loader of claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor sensing an input in the at least one hydraulic line senses at least one of a pressure, a flow, a flow and a pressure.
4. The loader of claim 1, where the at least one sensor sensing the at least one input in the at least one hydraulic line senses at least one pressure of the working element of the attachment.
5. The skid steer of claim 4, further comprising an at least one further measured variable sensed by the at least one sensor or from a further at least one sensor, the at least one further measured variable being at least one of a hydraulic fluid flow rate, a hydraulic fluid temperature, a hydraulic fluid flow, a variable displacement setting in the hydraulic system, torque at the working element, orifice sizes, the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of a hydraulic manifold, external or ambient temperatures, rotation speed of cutting head and gauge pressure.
6. The skid steer of claim 5, wherein the controller adjusts the forward velocity based on the at least one input in combination with the at least one further sensed variable to optimize work at the attachment.
7. The skid steer of claim 6, wherein the controller adjusts the forward velocity based on the at least one input in combination with the at least one further sensed variable and calculates the target values for the optimization of the work output of the attachment as sensed by and adjusting to maintain the sensed at least one input and further sensed variables in computed optimized ranges.
8. The skid steer of claim 7, further comprising an at least one PID controller to control the at least one sensed input within the mapped optimized range.
9. The skid steer of claim 8, further comprising a further PID controller to control the at least one further measured variable.
10. The skid steer of claim 1, further comprising at least one user programmable input.
11. The skid steer of claim 10, wherein the at least one user programmable input is at least one of a model designator, a displacement, material variables, a tool life estimate, at least one input related to the working surface material or surface composition, material consistency or specific descriptors related to the processing tools or attachment, outdoor temperature, hours in service, an at least one variable representing tool wear, processed area, density, toughness, and strength of the surface material.
12. The skid steer loader of claim 1, wherein the operating attachment is a planer, mower, tiller, soil conditioner, trencher, snow blower, or wheel saw.
13. The skid steer loader of claim 1, wherein the controller accesses a stored, mapped performance curve or surface based on a sensed variable chosen from at least one of pressure, flow, or pressure and flow to set an optimal efficiency target for the work being done at the attachment and determining with the at least one sensed variable where the current operation is relative to that curve and adjusting to move toward the optimized value of the sensed variable.
14. The skid steer of claim 13, wherein the controller has an at least one machine learning element, wherein the machine learning element adjusts the stored, mapped performance curve or surface.
15. The skid steer of claim 14, wherein the at least one machine learning element interrogates, stores, and adjusts the performance curve or surfaced based on historical sampling of the at least one sensed variable.
16. An add-on or retrofit kit for an existing attachment which couples to a vehicle mounting the attachment with speed management or speed creep controls, comprising: an attachment frame; a hydraulic manifold coupled to a hydraulic system of the vehicle and having an at least one hydraulic drive motor; an at least one sensor sensing an at least one variable of the at least one hydraulic drive motor or hydraulic manifold, the sensed variable correlating to the work output of the attachment; and an attachment controller, wherein the at least one variable is sensed and reported to the controller and compared to an optimized working range for the variable, the attachment controller is adapted to send a signal to control the speed of the vehicle utilizing the speed management or speed creep control signals to control the speed of the vehicle and thereby the feed rate of material to the attachment and thereby control the work done by the attachment by maintaining the at least one variable in the optimized working range.
17. The kit of claim 16, wherein an at least one user input is set by a user of the vehicle.
18. The kit of claim 16, wherein the at least one user input further comprises at least one of an input that sets initial vehicle speed, sets or accesses or calculates maximum work values for the attachment, and control elements to automatically adjust the sensed variables to achieve and maintain this maximum work value as a function of the sensed variables.
19. The kit of claim 16, wherein the at least one sensor sensing a variable senses at least one of a pressure, a flow, a flow and a pressure in the hydraulic system, the at least one hydraulic manifold or the at least one attachment motor as the at least one sensed input.
20. The kit of claim 19, wherein the controller is further adapted to adjust the forward velocity of the vehicle and thereby the feed rate of material to the attachment and in turn changes the sensed at least one pressure flow, and flow and a pressure.
21. The kit of claim 16, wherein the vehicle is one of a lawn mower, tractor, tiller, excavator, dozer, self-propelled saw, tracked loader, wheeled loader, dozer, vehicles with bundler, landscape rake, mulcher, stone crusher, sifting vehicle, planer, beach cleaner, soil conditioner, snow blower, stump grinder, flail mower, rotary mower, wheel saw, asphalt saw cutter, trencher, and planer.
22. A controller controlling an industrial device or vehicle based directly on a calculated estimate of work being done at the working element of an attachment, comprising: a programmable logic controller; a data storage device coupled to the controller; an at least one sensor sensing at least one variable that is used to calculate the estimate of work being done at the processing motor; an at least one output controlling an at least one parameter that increases or decreases proportionately with the at least on variable and thereby increases or decreases the calculated estimate of work done at the processing motor, wherein the controller is adapted to calculate the estimated work done by receiving the at least one variable sensed by the at least one sensor, calculating an estimate of work, comparing this calculated value against an optimal calculated value and adjusting the at least one output through the increase or decrease of the at least one output and thereby the at least one parameter to adjust the estimate of work.
23. The automated controller of claim 22, further comprising an at least one electric system wherein the processing element is electrically powered and coupled to the at least electric system.
24. The automated controller of claim 22, wherein the at least one variable is at least one of pressure.
25. The automated controller of claim 24, wherein the optimal variable is adjusted by further inputs.
26. The automated controller of claim 25, further inputs include at least one of time in service, wear factor, material composition, temperature, a hydraulic fluid flow rate, a hydraulic fluid temperature, a hydraulic fluid flow, a variable displacement setting in the hydraulic system, torque at the working element, orifice sizes, the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of a hydraulic manifold, external or ambient temperatures, rotation speed of cutting head.
27. The automated controller of claim 22, wherein the at least one output is a feed rate of material to the attachment.
28. The automated controller of claim 28, wherein the feed rate of material to the attachment is adjusted by the increase or decrease in the speed of a vehicle to which the attachment is coupled.
29. A method of controlling an attachment having an attachment work optimizing controller and coupled to a vehicle, comprising the method steps of: engaging an attachment; conducting a startup sequence; setting user inputs using a user interface; engaging the attachment to work on a work surface; sensing with an at least one sensor an at least one variable representing an estimate of the work done through a working element of the attachment working upon the work surface; calculating an estimated work value for work done at the attachment from the at least one sensor; comparing the estimated work value to an optimized work target for the work done at the attachment; controlling an output, wherein the output is adjusted by the controller and effects the at least one variable so that the estimated work value remains within a defined bounded value around the target optimized work value.
30. The method of claim 30, wherein the attachment has a motor and is driven by an at least one hydraulic system.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the sensed at least one variable is an at least one of a pressure, a flow, and a pressure and a flow.
32. The method of claim 30, wherein the sensed at least one variable is an at least one pressure.
33. The method of claim 30, wherein the output is the velocity of the vehicle which directly affects the feed rate of the work surface.
34. The method of claim 30, further comprising the step of calculating from the user inputs the optimized work target.
35. The method of claim 30, wherein the method step of setting user inputs further comprises accessing an at least one database of variables.
36. The method of claim 37, wherein the method step of setting user inputs further comprises accessing the database for limits for the attachment or a material being worked upon or both.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0068] Embodiments of the invention are explained in greater detail by way of the drawings depicting non-limiting exemplary embodiments, where the same reference numerals refer to the same features.
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0080] The invention comprises an industrial vehicle or manufacturing equipment having a working device or attachment with at least one industrial vehicle speed control or infeed speed controller component governing speed through inputs and outputs, colloquially a controller, sub-controller, or algorithm governing speed, often referred to, in a non-limiting example, as a Speed Management Unit (SMU) in the construction vehicle industry, and a pressure and/or flow sensor input from the working device or attachment communicating with said controller component.
[0081] Using the non-limiting example of a construction vehicle as an industrial vehicle, the existing SMU governs speed and is adjusted manually to move the vehicle around a job site. The SMU typically receives input from an operator in the cab of the vehicle, these inputs governing speed during movement and during operations with the attachment on the vehicle for instance. The instant invention reads information from sensor(s) detecting at least one parameter that represents work being done at the attachment, the results of which are sent to the controller in the exemplary embodiment of the invention. Based on specific mapping of the at least one sensed parameter as it relates to hydraulic, electric or attachment power and system performance or work as it is stored on the controller or accessible by the controller. This mapping provides boundary conditions accessible on the controller or in storage that is updatable as well as providing for the additional or pre-programmed or user defined inputs and adjustments of these existing values. Based on the stored performance curve or surface data, a determination is made by the controller based on at least one sensed parameter(s) as compared against the mapped, stored and/or adjusted parameters to determine whether the current operation of the working device is optimal.
[0082] Directly affecting change in pressure through changes in forward or feed velocity and thereby load, results in direct changes in the pressure, and/or changes in the flow in the hydraulic motor managing the working element so as to optimize the work output without passing boundary conditions in the operation of the system and causing the pressure relief valve to release. This operation is distinguishable in that in the instant invention this is directly measuring at the working element the pressure provided by the hydraulic system which provides a more accurate and timely status of the machine and can take into account a wider variety of sensed variables in optimization of operations of the machine or attachment.
[0083] As is known in the art, hydraulic power (horsepower output) is a product of flow, pressure, temperature, and efficiency. Thus, sensing pressure at the tool can be used to work back to optimization values for work via such power calculations. Factors specific to that type of machine and even specific to that particular machine and its motors and its wear condition can be accommodated in the optimization calculations. In a first embodiment on a planning machine as shown, the forward velocity of the system can be isolated as a principal input affecting the sensed pressure at the tool. Further inputs can be added to this and further embodiments, including but not limited to oil temperature, cutting element velocity, attachment RPM, attachment temperature, attachment torque, vehicle and/or attachment drift velocity or vectors, attachment angle of attack, inclination of work surface being traversed, sensor data representing wear on the vehicle or attachment or both, manual inputs representing wear or condition of the equipment including but not limited to for example time in service, blade sharpness, time on job, and material variables for a material being worked upon
[0084] This determination within the controller and the method of operation executed by the controller in an exemplary embodiment of the instant invention provides for an output that adjusts the forward rate and thereby the rate of feed to the attachment to maintain the operation at or near the optimal values, e.g. if the vehicle needs to go faster or slower based on the sensed parameter data at the attachment or working device the controller can automatically adjust the infeed speed and thereby adjusts the work being done at the working device or attachment with the monitoring of the measured or sensed values, e.g. pressure, flow, pressure and flow for instance. By targeting the sensed value that is related through known equations for work output, the optimization can be targeted and maintained, e.g. by maintain the sensed values at an optimized target the work done is known through calculation and can be maintained as well. In this fashion, the instant invention works to optimize the operation of the working device without the need for operator input. In the simplest version the direct relationship of pressure to work output with a known displacement and therefore flow can be used to correlate pressure and work directly from the known equations for work in a hydraulic system.
[0085] The values of a variety of variables can be obtained as noted. Principally, in the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention disclosed in the accompanying drawings, a non-limiting example of a planar is provided. Like many attachments, the work done at the attachment is the direct product of the sensed input in this instance an at least one pressure measurement and changes in the resulting variables value, e.g. pressure, which are directly related to changes needed to optimize work output as is known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The pressure calculations made in the instant invention is distinct from solutions utilizing or measuring only engine RPM in that the pressure in a hydraulic system with a maximum or crack pressure and a pressure relief system can still maintain an RPM even when the pressure is dumped and not used for work. Thus, the instant invention, in the exemplary embodiment shown, is more accurate than and better capable of determining automatic adjustment of the work done at the working tool more readily and accurately than previous solutions. Sufficient to allow for automated optimization of the process. A driver for this in the case of the exemplary embodiment of the planar is the feed rate of the material which directly affects the pressure at the working attachment and thus the work.
[0086] In one of the exemplary embodiments described, the controller mimics the “FAST” and “SLOW” buttons (switches) operations which are already in the vehicle and sends these input pulses or ON-OFF commands through existing communication ports to the Speed Management Unit/controller. In a further exemplary embodiment, a more integrated solution implementing the instant inventions controller and programming is incorporated into the SMU of the vehicle or in a package within the attachment that couples to the SMU and control the speed directly in the programming of the SMU. Similarly, a still further embodiment could incorporate the instant invention into the programmed logic controller for a self-driving and/or self-operating programmable working device or industrial vehicle.
[0087]
[0088] Similarly, it is further shown in
[0089] Turning again to
[0090]
[0091] It should, however, also be noted that inputs can be provided via mechanical or analog elements as well. For instance, hand grips can be coupled to levers which control valve spools or solenoids through mechanical linkages (not shown). Similarly, foot pedals (not shown) can be provided in operator compartment 40 which also control valve spools or solenoids through mechanical linkages. Additionally, secondary low pressure hydraulic systems can be employed, for example this is typical on excavators which have what is commonly referred to in the industry as Pilot controls i.e. a lower pressure hydraulic circuit going to joystick inputs that move the spools on the main hydraulic circuit. Other alternative controls provide for all electric and/or digital inputs. These control inputs can transmit similar signals as those previously enumerated. These signals can be hardwired or transmitted wirelessly or through known networks or similar wireless methods. These can include for example, but are certainly not limited to CANbus, CANopen, PROFIBUS, Ethernet, EtherCAT and other network integration solutions. Multiple programming platforms are also contemplated, for instance, those utilized by Delta, Allen Bradley, Weg, Wonderware, Emerson, and IFM Efector. In addition, remote or automated operation is also contemplated within the scope of the type and condition of the exemplary loaders of the instant invention, whereby the operator compartment would be replaced with automated control, communications and/or remote-control equipment.
[0092] In the exemplary embodiment depicted, a set of lift arms 50 is coupled to frame 20 at pivot points 55. Typically two arms work in conjunction with one another, though only one of the pair of arms is shown in the view depicted in
[0093] While only one attachment hydraulic line 90 is shown, it is understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that any desired number of cylinders and lines could be used to work the attached planer or any other suitable tool without departing from the scope of the invention. Reference to the single additional set of attachment hydraulic supply lines is for illustrative purposes only. Further lines are contemplated and depend principally on the nature of the attachment 100. In the non-limiting exemplary embodiment shown, the single line is utilized for the planer. Similarly, though a single line is illustrated, hydraulic systems work on a circuit and an outflow line 99 to recover the fluid is provided. For clarity and brevity, reference to the return lines has been omitted in several of the figures, but it is understood that the circuits are complete within the system as well understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Similarly, at least one hydraulic fluid reservoir is also implied within the system as described and, again, as would be well understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
[0094] In addition, loader 10 illustratively has one or more auxiliary hydraulic couplings and further auxiliary hydraulic lines, as best shown in
[0095] The main mounting frame 110 is provided with the attachment connected thereto by attachment connectors or skid steer coupling(s) 107, for instance in the case of a BOBCAT skid steer the BOB-TACH ISO 24410 frame and coupling are one non-limiting example of a quick coupling interface between the attachment 100 and the skid steer 10 as is known in the industry. A planing or milling drum or roller 150 is mounted within attachment frame 105. The planing drum 150 spinning on an axis A as shown in the figure, rotates grinding elements 155 (best seen in
[0096] The operator manipulates lift arms 50 and planer attachment 100 by selectively actuating the hydraulic systems. This can include, but by no means is it limited to, lifting the arms 50 and thereby the attachment 100 as well as specific controls of one or more movements within the attachment, in this instance as best described herein below with respect to
[0097] As noted a wide number of further attachments can include but are certainly not limited to lawn mowers, tractors, tiller, excavators, self-propelled saws, tracked loaders, wheeled loaders, dozers, and similar devices, attachments with bundlers, landscape rakes, mulchers, stone crushers, sifting devices, planers, beach cleaners, soil conditioners, snow blowers, stump grinders, flail mowers, rotary mowers, wheel saws, asphalt saw cutters, trenchers, planers and the like as attachments to a vehicle or device as noted previously. The vehicle or carrier 10 can use the frame or frame interface 107, which can for instance be an ISO 24410 107 standard interface, to quickly change the attachment 100.
[0098] There can be variations in the attachment pertaining to the number, size, and similar aspects of the hydraulic motor(s) 640, as introduced in
[0099] Additionally, variations in the desired noise profile or operation speed of the main motor 660 output during operations (100% vs 75% for throttle for instance) can vary power available to the attachment 100 as discussed herein. With less power available, less work can be performed. The controller 500 can sense and adjust accordingly. This can be done either manually or automatically through the controller 500. For example, if noise regulations require operation of the machinery at lower decibel levels, the engine is typically run at a lower throttle setting. The controller 500 can be programmed or set to accommodate this requirement. Similarly, in instances where flow measurements are included in the controls, such as that shown in
[0100] These further implementations would necessarily be adjusted such that the inputs from and to the hydraulics controlling the given attachments 100 are applicable for or to that type of attachment 100. With the instant invention being adjusted to provide control and monitoring of the hydraulics as specified herein on the controller for the particular attachment as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art such that an at least one parameter, such as but not limited to pressure, flow, and pressure and flow, which is measured to determine instantaneous work done by the attachment and monitored such that the work at the attachment based on an at least one parameter that is monitored and kept within an optimized work range based on adjustment of the at least one parameter and/or an at least one input principally effecting desired changes in the at least one parameter.
[0101]
[0102] As described in greater detail in
[0103] In use, as shown in
[0104] In the exemplary embodiment, as a non-limiting example the depth of cut, roll, lateral position, initial operating speed of the drum and similar variables are set by the operator or selected from a pre-programmed profile or a combination of both. There are a number of processing parameters affecting the loading. The loading of the drum is directly proportional to the work efficiency of the tool, thus the optimal speed of the drum should be maintained in the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention shown with a planar attachment to maintain optimum loading and not a variable in this exemplary embodiment. However, for the exemplary embodiment affecting the work of the attachment 100, the advancement velocity of the operating industrial vehicle 10 which is governed by the operator O, for example, by means of a maneuver joystick or other inputs as discussed herein, directly affects the feed rate and thereby the loading of the invention. The loading is directly proportional to the measured pressure of the hydraulic line for the motor and thereby the work performed. The instant invention when engaged adjusts automatically based on sensed parameters the velocity of the vehicle and thereby feed rate of material and thereby the work done based on sensed parameters so as to maintain the loading through monitoring pressure and maintaining the ideal work output at the attachment. The vehicle being slowed or sped up to maintain the load on the milling drum and work efficiency at the drum at an optimum level.
[0105] In alternative exemplary embodiments, the attachment can be affected by more than one variable in optimizing the work output. Basically, the source of power in the system, industrial vehicle or industrial device can be adjusted by throttling that source up or down. In the principal exemplary embodiment shown this is through the main drive motor of the vehicle. In alternate exemplary embodiments this can be the drive motor for the attachment. The throttling up or down will adjust, in the example of a hydraulic system, the flow of hydraulic fluid. The pressure and flow together are used to calculate power. This power over time is equivalent to work output. For the exemplary embodiment of the planer shown, ideally the planar attachment should be operating in the upper range of the pressure to ensure that the attachment is being “loaded up” and not just freewheeling, e.g. spinning without sufficient feed of material. Too high of a pressure is indicative of a stalled attachment and all the hydraulic fluid will leak out through the pressure relief valve, so the operator wants to stay in this optimum operational range or the “sweet spot” balancing feed rate or forward velocity with pressure at the working element of the attachment.
[0106] Thus the exemplary embodiment shown and further alternate exemplary embodiments can also adjust for flow rates within the system. The flow rate can be adjusted in a further exemplary embodiment of the planar shown so as to accommodate, for instance, cutting through differentiated materials, e.g. asphalt to concrete, flow can be continually optimized. This follows as in principal the drive motor or attachment motor should be sized so that it's operating at an optimum RPM at some predefined power or throttle setting, e.g. on a maximized power curve. And flow rate optimization for a planer controls the speed or velocity of the rotating drum and optimizes it in conjunction with pressure. For instance, in cutting concrete optimized performance would generally be had at slower rotations while with looser, less dense material like asphalt higher rotations would be optimum. This could be sensed by changes in the pressure in the system and the flow sensed and regulated in conjunction with the detected pressure.
[0107] Whereas, for alternative exemplary embodiments, something like a flail mower attachment, the RPM of the blade is more critical than pressure in the performance of the attachment. The RPM of the cutting edges of the flails cannot drop below a certain RPM otherwise you will not cut the grass, you'll bend it. Thus in this instance a minimum rotational velocity for proper operation must be maintained. Since it is known that the flow can vary with power available as well as differences in the attachment (e.g. different motors), it becomes more complex tracking the loading and maintaining flow in these instances for an operator, but can be optimized using the instant invention.
[0108] In either case though, having a high rotational speed of the working motor can mean that the system is freewheeling and not loading attachment motor enough, either through some minimum rotational speed (mower) or some maximum load/pressure (planer). The instant invention is unique in that it is automatically monitoring and adjusting for these variables to optimize work output at the attachment. Similarly, it is flexible and adjustable enough to provide for the “smart” controller inputs and outputs needed to overcome issues with needing an experienced operator by assisting inexperienced operators in managing the complex operating variables whilst adapting to the variety of potential attachments and the types of inputs and output necessary to accommodate different applications.
[0109]
[0110] Milling or planing elements or tools 155 extend from the outer surface of the processing, milling, and/or planing drum 150, as best seen in
[0111] In this instance, in the exemplary embodiment featuring the planar attachment 100, the auxiliary hydraulic motor supply line 165 is coupled to and supplies power for the planer drum 150. A sensor 460 is supplied and located as part of the coupling of the auxiliary hydraulic supply line 165 to the attachment hydraulic motor 640 for the drum 150. The sensor can be, for instance, but is certainly not limited to a pressure transducer or pressure and flow transducer or a flow meter or the like. Although a single sensor is shown, additional sensors to confirm pressure and/or flow changes and monitor the pressure elsewhere in the system can be provided. Similarly, additional types of sensors and additional parameter measurements, for instance flow and pressure or only flow, can also be measured and utilized in the operation of the vehicle.
[0112] In particular, the industrial vehicle or device 10 can be of the type shown in
[0113] In an alternate embodiment within a tool carrier or vehicle which has a flail mower the attachment motor and other elements related to for example hydraulic controls including but not limited to the manifold and the related hydraulic lines would be similar. The flail mower attachment, as described herein, is a similar drum shape having pivoting blade or flail elements attached along the circumference of the drum. The blade attachments spinning with the drum or rotating with the drum provide a cutting motion above a turf surface such that the grass is struck by and cut by the blade attachments. For this alternate exemplary embodiment, the rotational speed of the drum is monitored by an at least one sensor which can monitor flow or pressure or pressure and flow. The controller is also similar to that of the exemplary embodiment shown for the planer, but it can also include the monitoring of the RPM of the attachment and/or the flow being sent to the attachment which is directly proportional to the RPM.
[0114] Turning back to the exemplary embodiment of
[0115] The velocity of the vehicle 10 governs feed rate as noted above and is typically the principal adjustment being made to achieve the most efficient work from the vehicle and attachment in the basic exemplary embodiment. In prior art machines, this is governed by an input made by the operator O in the cab 40 on the fly as discussed above in the background of the invention, this is often done based on “feel” or operator experience. It may be supplemented by the readout from a pressure gauge such as that marketed as the PERFORMER. However, only the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention utilizes a stored mapped performance curve or surface based on pressure, flow, or pressure and flow or similar variables to set an optimal efficiency target for the work being done at the attachment 100 and determines with the sensor(s) 460 where the current operation is relative to that curve and then assists in adjusting or adjusts the vehicle speed.
[0116] In the exemplary embodiment of the industrial vehicle shown, the measured instantaneous work as sensed by the sensor(s) 460 and the resulting changes in the variables are then processed by the controller 500 as described herein below. The velocity of the industrial vehicle 10 can be adjusted to adjust feed rate by the controller 500 and maintain a determined maximum efficiency of operating the attachment 100, an exemplary embodiment of this process being described herein below in reference to
[0117]
[0118]
[0119]
[0120] Further systems can be incorporated to provide power, transmit power, or couple to the controller of the attachment 100 or of the industrial vehicle 10 without departing from the instant invention. Additionally in this description of an exemplary embodiment, reference is also made to a single motor in the attachment throughout the description for brevity. Though single motor attachments are shown in the exemplary embodiment, multiple motors can similarly be provided without departing from the spirit of the invention and can be equally used in the control logic/schema of the instant invention. Though these pumps and motors reference hydraulic systems, the systems can provide either electric or hydraulic power through supply lines to similar effect. In fact, as noted herein, electric power systems can be operated in an analog to hydraulic systems and the current measured as part of a single or more measurement within the system similar to hydraulic pressure being measured in the hydraulic system to determine work. Additional measurements can be but are not limited to frequency, voltage or current, and can also include parameters described within exemplary embodiment.
[0121] In the exemplary embodiment shown, these pumps 83, 87 supply hydraulic power through pressurized hydraulic lines, 91, 92 to an at least one hydraulic motor, here depicted as two motors 96, 97. The motors 96, 97 as part of the transmission each powers the transmission 94 and drives wheels 25. The power rating of this principal engine 660 establishes the power budget of the vehicle, machine or industrial device in the case of a non-vehicle implementation of the instant invention and is shared by the drive elements as well as the working elements in the attachment.
[0122] On hydraulic machines like that shown in the exemplary embodiment, the power that the principal engine 660 can produce has to be balanced with the power that the at least one hydraulic system(s) use or uses. The maximum amount of power that the principal engine 660 can make depends on the power or throttle setting at which it is running. On the skid steer loader or a similar industrial vehicle 10, the principal engine 660 can be operated at full speed and can produce its top rated horsepower, but this is typically shared at least between its drive function or vehicle velocity and the work being done by an attachment 100. There is a budget of power that has to be distributed between all the functions, but, if the velocity demand and attachment work demand are too high, the prime mover engine 660 stalls before crack pressures are reached or the maximum pressure or flow which is available for the attachment is inadequate for any useful function. These limits and their use in the control and operation of the instant invention are detailed further herein in relation to the controller 500, as shown in
[0123] The power used by the hydraulic motors or pumps is equal to its pressure multiplied by the flow rate of its fluid. The faster the given motor or pump spins, typically, the higher the flow rate. As a load is applied to the motor, the pressure increases, and the flow decreases. This tradeoff between flow and pressure continues until the crack pressure of a pressure relief valve of the hydraulic circuit is reached. When this pressure is reached and the relief valve opens, the pressure drops down again, and the valve stays open until it reaches a lower pressure. This curve is the power curve which is allotted to the hydraulic motor by the pump, the valve block on vehicle 10 or attachment 100 and engine system providing both maximum work efficiency pressure targets (OP as described below) as well as maximum pressure (Maxi as described further in relation to the flow charts in
[0124] The system is designed so the full power of the principal engine 660 can be provided to the wheels or tracks 25, lift arms 50, and the implements or attachments 100 at any given time or, that this maximum power is split between the drive, work group and attachment systems as needed. In most instances in vehicles and industrial devices like the skid steer 10 shown, it is up to the operator to carefully modulate the controls to keep the tool motor 640 from stalling by exceeding the available power, which requires skill and practice. To operate the attachment 100 efficiently, e.g. maximize efficiency, speed and processing work done at the tool or attachment 100, again, this is part of the balancing done by an experienced operator in existing devices. This requires the operator to understand and adjust for a multitude of variables for optimization, including vehicle speed and attachment or tool operational speed. At the most basic level the feed rate of operational material to the attachment primarily effects the production and power demand and dictates this balancing or tuning.
[0125] There exists an optimum efficiency along this pump power curve which in some embodiments can be used, but in other embodiments, only the performance of the hydraulic attachment or tool motor in completing its instantaneous task is taken into consideration to establish an optimal range. This task efficiency can typically be achieved by maintaining, for example but certainly not limited to, an optimum rotation speed as defined by flow or by optimum resistance or load as defined by pressure or a combination of each measurement as sensed by the at least one sensor 460. In the exemplary embodiment of
[0126] The instant invention assists in addressing this need by providing controller 500 that can modulate the prime mover or drive motor or main motor 660 power demand and the attachment power demand, essentially optimizing the performance automatically by sensing the output of each and performing the adjustments automatically to outputs that adjust the resulting work. This is accomplished by careful control and monitoring of the power at the attachment 100 and its hydraulic motor 640 by the controller 500 so that it is engaged in maximum work output whilst simultaneously modulating the power to the prime mover or drive motor 660 to move the equipment and feed the attachment, balancing feed rate and work done by the attachment automatically. The steps of this are explained in greater detail with reference to a flow chart in
[0127] As noted, in a non-limiting example of a further alternate exemplary embodiment of an attachment within an industrial vehicle or machine a flail mower attachment can be provided. This type of attachment has a flow rate that would be more paramount to define optimal work performance more than pressure alone, vis-a-viz forward velocity, to maintain feed rate as the input to adjust and optimize work output. A flail mower is a type of mower which has a horizontally oriented drum which is powered by a hydraulic motor. The drum has cutting implements, typically but certainly not limited to blade elements shaped like and referred to as hammers or small blades mounted on hinges along the circumference of the drum. The centrifugal force of the rotating drum keeps the cutting implements extended until they make contact with grass, branches, saplings, or the like upon which the attachment is being applied. Upon contact with the grass the cutting implement either cuts through the material or hacks at it, and folds back at the hinge, thereby minimizing the energy loss of the cutting implement getting hung up on something.
[0128] In this application, maintaining an optimal rotational speed or angular velocity is important in defining feed-rate. If the rotational speed of the drum is too slow, the blades will fold back and not cut the material or the material may just fold back and not be cut. If the drum is spinning too fast, it could damage the drum due to excess force, but more importantly as noted in planer application, a fast spinning drum is still a sign of ‘freewheeling’ and is not efficient. In this application the flow rate must be kept within a range which matches the material being processed by adjusting the feed rate or forward velocity of the tool carrier. Similarly, in other embodiments of the exemplary embodiment of the planer, it can be beneficial but would increase complexity and cost for the operator to operate within a flow rate range due to a need to process various materials at different cutting speeds, e.g. a surface that is non-uniform in structure or material type. Similar to machining metals, harder materials like concrete should be processed at lower rotational speeds while softer materials like asphalt should be processed at higher rotational speeds. In this instance, like with the flail mower attachment monitoring both pressure and flow in the analysis of work done at or by the attachment is specifically contemplated.
[0129] Complicating the matter in implementing flow and pressure controls in these alternate exemplary embodiments is that fact that as the vehicle starts to move faster, the blade speed needs to remain high enough to cut as the limited power provided by the prime mover begins to be diverted toward propelling the vehicle forward at higher speeds. The total power supplied remains constrained by the prime mover and the maximum pressure will be the same, as defined by relief valve and crack pressure but the available flow will decrease with increasing speed in an appropriately designed hydraulic system. Similarly in the non-limiting example this alternate mower exemplary embodiment, the at least one sensor in conjunction with the controller will be monitoring the rotational speed of the flail component of the mower while at the same time adjusting pressure to govern feed-rate or forward movement, the controller will need to ensure that the power available to the mower attachment does not fall below a threshold as power is diverted toward the forward drive, e.g. maximum forward speed is reduced to maintain the flail speed.
[0130]
[0131] In this exemplary embodiment, the separate controller 500 is shown on the attachment 100 and communicates with the at least one sensor(s) 460 coupled on the attachment hydraulic motor 640. As shown
[0132] The controller 500 is mounted separately on the attachment 100, communicates with the at least one sensor(s) 460, the attachment hydraulic motor 640, and the industrial vehicle 10. As part of the communications, the at least one sensor(s) 460 measures at least one parameter as discussed at length herein. These measurements and the communications are transmitted, wirelessly or by wire to the controller 500 as inputs. The controller 500 can be, as pictured here, a single dedicated controller that is located on the attachment 100 and communicates, again by wire or wirelessly, with a master controller 600 on the industrial vehicle 10. The industrial vehicle 10 has a separate speed management unit (SMU) 605, as noted herein above, as a component of its systems controls which is typical of most construction vehicles. The SMU 605 communicates with the main drive unit 94 which has additional components, e.g. servos, manifold, and can adjust forward velocity as part of its typical function. In this exemplary embodiment of the controller of the instant invention, the SMU 605 also communicates with the attachment controller 500.
[0133] The controller 500, sensing and communicating the pressure transmitted by the at least one sensor 460, can mimic the existing inputs for “faster” or “slower” commands available on loader 10 that are typically communicated to the SMU 605 by the operator O through control inputs 310. In this way, the exemplary embodiment can replicate existing control inputs available through the manual control inputs 310 in the cab 40, as further described herein in relation to the flow charts of
[0134]
[0135] Additional inputs can be included without departing from the invention, these can include for instance but are certainly not limited to side drift caused by sloping road or non-centric resistance from the attachment or other interface variables and the like. For example, if the planer has a horizontal offset to the right, the loader will tend to drift to the right since there is more resistance on that side due to the offset. There is a program setting within the vehicle controller 600 which allows the system to accommodate the offset or drift so it does not have to be managed manually. The controller can also store information, for example if an operator or vehicle is operating at less than optimum performance or speed this can be stored and/or an ability can be provided to track productivity and efficiency and store it or provide real time measurements and tying this to instances where maintenance can be required or indicated as being needed— e.g. monitoring when it is time to get new teeth on the drum.
[0136] The controller 500 is in communication with controller data storage 505. This can be for instance memory to store data on the controller 500. It can also be a wireless link to an off board/controller storage in a cloud network or a detachable or programmable data storage device such as a hard drive or removable storage device, for example an SDSC card or thumb drive, with information stored thereon. As discussed below in relation to the flow chart for the software operating on the controller, the data stored can include specific optimized pressure and performance data used to determine whether the attachment 100 is operating at optimized performance. It can also contain software, firmware, or other operating code and programming to operate the attachment or vehicle. It can also function as storage for historical or operational data that is retained during and/or after operation. This data can be used for diagnostics or to improve the accuracy of the optimization values provided through machine learning (AI). It can also be used to adjust for wear and other factors affecting the attachments ability to do work. The controller 500 receives these data inputs as specified. It acts upon these data inputs utilizing the stored programming thereon, for instance using the method outlined in the flowcharts of
[0137] The controller 500 in turn sends or transmits data outputs represented on the right side of the diagram. The data inputs and outputs shown are non-limiting examples, intended to illustrate operation in the exemplary embodiment described. Additional inputs and outputs are contemplated and can include, for example, but are not limited to engine RPM, oil temperature, cutting element velocity, attachment RPM, attachment temperature, attachment torque, vehicle and/or attachment drift velocity or vectors, attachment angle of attack, inclination of work surface being traversed, sensor data representing wear on the vehicle or attachment or both, manual inputs representing wear or condition of the equipment including but not limited to for example time in service, blade sharpness, time on job and the like. In the exemplary embodiment shown, the controller 500 communicates with the attachment hydraulic motor 640, the principal drive motor or engine or prime mover 660, and display panel indicators 670. The display panel indicators 670 can include, but are certainly not limited to, responses on a screen, indicator lights, and the like.
[0138] In the exemplary embodiments wherein the controller 500 is an attachment controller communicating with a speed control unit as in
[0139] This can, in the non-limiting example, be for instance a planar or trencher with a defined rotational speed at defined power settings that on the one hand shows when the planar or trencher is “freewheeling” or not engaged sufficiently with the work piece. On the other end of the spectrum, again in the non-limiting case of a planar or trencher, a sudden spike in power or slowdown in wheel speed associated with “stalling out” or a condition in which the feed rate and therefore the working rate of the attachment is drastically reduced can represent a lower bound. If either of the bounds is approached within a response margin or boundary condition, the sensors can detect the power demand shift and adjust the vehicle speed through a signal sent from the controller 500 and then in some instances unto the speed control unit 605. Though other variables and measurements which can be used, for instance but are certainly not limited to rotational velocities or shaft rotations, or the like. The fidelity of using the variables via the exemplary embodiment using direct measurement sensors provides near instantaneous analysis on work being done as this is directly correlated to the pressure, flow, or pressure and flow in these systems. The objective of the control schema or logic of the controller 500, as more clearly shown in the flow charts of
[0140] In addition to the output bounds programmed as a basis for operating or optimizing the cutting/machining process the controller can utilize or modify the bounds with additional variables that can be included to adjust the end limits of the bounds. These can be pre-programmed in the controller 500 or provided by the user as a user programmed input. For example, some non-limiting examples of operator adjustable factors, inputs, or variables can include factors that allow the operator to adjust for tool life, a model designator, a displacement, material variables, working surface material or surface composition, material consistency or specific descriptors related to processing tools or attachment, outdoor temperature, hours in service, an at least one variable representing tool wear and the like.
[0141] Filtering is needed to avoid oscillations in control inputs and outputs and is well known in modern control theory where sampling and response rates can be measured in nanoseconds and even picoseconds. To attenuate a feedback loop or similar issue, a time delay feature or sample averaging can be utilized to smooth inputs or outputs before changing velocities in the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention. One non-limiting feedback schema in vehicle control inputs of the type utilized in the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention mounting a planar attachment provides that the usual oscillation frequency of ground engagement is around about ninety (90) to one hundred twenty (120) cycles per minute, more preferably around about one hundred and ten (110) cycles per minute. This would translate into a time delay of about one (1 S) second to two point two seconds (2.2 S), more preferably about one point eight seconds (1.8 S) or more between sampling-cycles or samples or branches and restarting the loop would be sufficient to attenuate oscillations in the signal caused by variations in the material and/or from operator induced oscillations or the like. Other means of controlling, filtering and/or dampening via software, electronics (e.g. Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or variable sampling cycle elements and gates), proportional-integrated-differential controllers or mechanical elements (e.g. timing gears, electromechanical switching) or similar can be used to the same result, effectively dampening a recurring input so that it does not amplify out of control.
[0142] With this in mind the exemplary embodiments shown in the flow charts of
[0143] Of further note, with respect to safety, it is typical for an industrial vehicle like the loader of the exemplary embodiment and construction vehicles in general to have a speed limit setting on or within the controller of the vehicle. These limit the top speed at the forward most position of the joystick or other control input as set in the speed manager within the controller. In the exemplary embodiments of the method shown, the control outputs, the changes in velocity, mimic existing control outputs regulated by the existing safety controls within the software. This is important for the exemplary embodiment that is an attachment, as shown in
[0144] The construction vehicles existing speed controls can override functions in the exemplary embodiments shown. The construction vehicles velocity safety controls would stand and the adjustments made by the controller 500 would be understood in the comparable manner that existing input from the joystick controller or manual input of the operator were being actuated. In this sense and in a similar fashion though the controller 500 is sending the velocity adjustments, the safety software regulates it the same as if the operator were increasing or decreasing the velocity. In further embodiments, like those shown in
[0145] It should be made clear that by the expression “maximum performance” or “optimized performance” or “optimized work” appearing throughout the application and provided herein, these are generally defined here as the performance corresponding to an optimum workload or load which the machine and/or the attachment can bear for the maximum volume of material that can be processed at a specific engine power setting, while taking into account variability in the material in the case of the planar. In other attachments, where flow and thereby tool velocity is included and dominant in determining performance, the maximum performance would be an idealized range or point measurement of the flow or a combination of flow and pressure corresponding to an optimum workload which the machine and/or the attachment can bear.
[0146] Turning to the exemplary embodiment shown, it should be pointed out that in the exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for milling solid surfaces of known type, the hydraulic system is provided with a safety device comprising, for instance but certainly not limited to, a safety valve 682, which stops or blocks the roller and, if necessary, halts the entire machine by preventing it from advancing when the pressure within the hydraulic circuit reaches an absolute maximum threshold pressure (AbsP) set by the producer or operator. This absolute maximum pressure (AbsP) sets a targeted maximum pressure, herein referred to as maximum pressure (MaxP) a safe amount or delta under the AbsP. If the system is configured correctly, when the pressure in the attachment hydraulic line reaches the relief or crack pressure the valve opens and begins to dump excess pressure. The MaxP is set just below this pressure, just at the range the relief valve would begin to relieve pressure, a safe delta below AbsP.
[0147] If AbsP is reached and the relief valve engaged to dump pressure, this is generally referred to as a “stall” condition for the attachment. If stall is detected, the system reduces or halts forward movement and resets or allows the system to clear and come back below the absolute maximum pressure. Of note with respect to the prior art, if the loader is operating close to the crack pressure, the valve may begin to flutter which will cause a cyclic buildup of stresses and eventually premature failure of the pressure relief valve. The instant invention aids in avoiding such a wear on the pressure relief valve. Additionally, as noted with the prior art, the operation of the loader by an inexperienced operator can require additional time and effort if the operator is overzealous and causes stalling in the attachment frequently, increasing the operating time, job time, and general wear and tear on the vehicle as well as impacting the quality of the work done.
[0148] The instant invention avoids this by automatically maintaining the pressure at or below this crack pressure at a selected value MaxP. Ideally, MaxP is at a safe margin from the crack pressure and not exceeding it such that the relief valve does not open during operations. Thus MaxP can be set such that it is as high a pressure as possible without activating the relief valve and thereby functions at high working efficiencies but not in excess of the crack pressure and certainly well below the absolute maximum pressure which would result in stall and require reset.
[0149] Similarly, given an advancement rate or velocity, a rotational speed, and a depth of cut or thickness of material, an idealized work function can be determined for the machine or industrial vehicle based on these inputs. This idealized or optimized work function curve for any given set of inputs is defined as the pressure efficiency target or optimum pressure (OP). OP can approach MaxP but not exceed MaxP for any given set of parameters. When the pressure sensed is less than MaxP and less than OP or a range around OP, the work being done is not at maximum efficiency for the rotational speed of the tool and this condition is referred to as “freewheeling”, meaning the tool is inefficiently being operated at a higher rate of rotational speed and additional material is needed to be fed to the system. This in turn will increase pressure on the system and be detected as such. Modulation of the pressure measured to at or near OP is the function of the exemplary embodiment of the controller 500 of the instant invention.
[0150]
[0151] The controller 500 is programmed to operate and follow the methods as disclosed. In this operation the controller has a startup cycle 505 when the attachment is engaged. The controller 500 obtains an optimum pressure “OP” as an input at step 510. This value can be stored and retrieved from a database, stored memory, operator input, or similar data source and storage in step 510. The OP can be a single variable function or a multivariate mapping of the performance curve or curves related to the attachment 100 and the working tool 150. Additionally, though not shown, a further step allowing for modification or adjustment of OP values can be provided and the adjusted data stored as OP data for retrieval. Similarly, as discussed above, a maximum pressure (MaxP) is provided at step 512 based on the pressure rating of the pressure relief valve 682 in the system. This is also obtained as an input for the controller 500 operation at step 512.
[0152] As noted above in
[0153] This attempts to prevent overpressure of the system and triggering of the pressure relief valve. As previously discussed, if the combined pressures in the systems exceeds the crack valve pressure the result is the valve opens and reduces the pressure, potentially stalling the attachment. In some implementations, however, this can not only stall the attachment but reduce the overall power available for the vehicle. One such example of this is a flail type lawnmower attachment, whereby the mower attachment must maintain a certain rotational speed. As the vehicle, the tractor mower in this instance, starts to move faster the attachment has less power available. The maximum pressure is similarly limited by the relief valve as in other exemplary embodiments, but the available flow to the attachment will decrease as demand to keep both rotational power and velocity can result in too high a demand, meaning the tractor mower will get bogged down. This exemplary embodiment in particular would benefit from the method in
[0154] If the pressure is lower than MaxP in step 520, the flow chart moves to a comparison of the sensed pressure reported by the pressure sensors in step 515 to the OP value communicated in step 510 is made at step 530. If the pressure is greater than or equal to the optimized pressure (OP) at step 530, the controller maintains the status quo through a cycle time in step 570. Upon completion of the cycle time at step 570, the method compares the pressure reading to the OP, it simply resets to sample again if the P equals the OP or if it does not equal OP incrementally reduces speed V− at step 535 as a precautionary measure to prevent runaway increases in velocity. Additionally, it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that strict comparison of values in the steps as outlined can be equally accomplished utilizing bounded comparisons, e.g. range values. One non-limiting example, for instance, would be if the sensed pressure (SP) were within ten percent of the MaxP or the sensed pressure were within plus or minus five percent of the optimum pressure OP, the logic test results in a positive branch result.
[0155] If the sensed pressure (SP) is less than the optimum pressure (OP) or less than the defined bounds around the optimum pressure, the signal is sent to incrementally increase velocity (+V) of the vehicle at step 525. This signal can be actuated or implemented in a number of ways. In one exemplary embodiment, the signal mimics that of the controls found in the operator compartment 40 on a control input 310, such as that of a joystick which typically includes buttons to incrementally increase velocity on such a joystick. In a further exemplary embodiment, this signal can be implemented as a signal from the attachment 100 to the industrial vehicle 10 and the SMU 605 of the industrial vehicle, as shown in
[0156] Upon completion of the incremental speed adjustment (+V) in step 525 or upon the expiry of the cycle time and the implementation of incremental speed adjustment (V−) in step 535 or if P=OP in step 580, the method restarts receiving a refreshed instantaneous sensed pressure (SP) input and comparing it to the MaxP and OP as outlined. In this fashion, once the depth of cut and other parameters are set the exemplary embodiment of the instant invention allows for the controller 500 to maintain optimum work at the tool operating environment by measurement of the pressure being demanded by the system and instantaneous changes in that pressure in real time. In this fashion the instant invention envisions a smart work output controller with at least one sensors for instantaneously detecting work done at the attachment coupled to an industrial vehicle or device and adjusting the forward velocity or feed rate without operator intervention, the controller can thereby reduce the reliance upon highly skilled operators for a consistent, smooth work output from a given device or vehicle.
[0157]
[0158] The controller 500 is programmed to operate and follow the methods as disclosed in this exemplary embodiment. Additional exemplary embodiments are contemplated as discussed herein utilizing additional variables with greater degrees of complexity. These can include for instance compensatory variables and operations accommodating variable displacement motors where flow and pressure can be adjusted to suit specifically desired characteristics, a non-limiting example being to adjust torque for instance. Similarly, as noted above, extensive use of PID controllers and controller logic can be incorporated in further exemplary embodiments. This can be facilitated by selection of specifically suited components and adjusting the programming to suit, but conceptually, these embodiments are contemplated in the instant invention.
[0159] The controller 500 is programmed to operate and follow the methods as disclosed. In this operation the controller has a startup cycle 505 when the attachment is engaged. The controller 500 obtains an optimum flow “OQ” as an input at step 590 and optimum pressure “OP” as an input at step 510. These values can be stored and retrieved from a database, stored memory, operator input, or similar data source and storage in step 510 and 590. The OQ and the OP can be a single variable function or a multivariate mapping of the performance curve or curves related to the attachment 100 and the working tool 150. Additionally, though not shown, a further step allowing for modification or adjustment of both optimized values can be provided and the adjusted data stored as adjusted optimized data for retrieval. Similarly, as discussed above, a maximum pressure (MaxP) is provided at step 512 based on the pressure rating of the pressure relief valve 682 in the system. This is also obtained as an input for the controller 500 operation at step 512.
[0160] As noted above in relation to the alternate exemplary embodiment described for a flail mower, an at least one sensor 460 provides an input for the controller 500 for both measured pressure (P) and flow (Q) for the attachment. The at least one sensor 460 also provides real time data reporting at sensing step 515 to the controller 500 as previously discussed. A comparison is made first as to whether the reported pressure sensed by the sensors 460 and the communicated at input 515 is less than or equal to the MaxP provided at step 512. If the MaxP is not exceeded at the decision step 520, the method proceeds to the comparison steps 530-590. If MaxP is exceeded, then the method immediately jumps to the step of lowering the forward velocity (V−) at 535.
[0161] This attempts to prevent overpressure of the system and triggering of the pressure relief valve, also known as stalling as described herein above. As previously discussed, if the combined pressures in the systems exceed the crack valve pressure the result is the valve opens and reduces the pressure, potentially stalling the attachment. Again, in these implementations this can not only stall the attachment but reduce the overall power available for the vehicle. The alternate exemplary embodiment discussed above is a flail type lawnmower attachment, whereby the mower attachment must maintain a certain rotational speed. As the vehicle, typically the tractor mower in this instance, starts to move faster the attachment has less power available. The maximum pressure is similarly limited to the pressure only embodiment by the relief valve and maximum pressure limitations as in other exemplary embodiments, but the available flow to the attachment can decrease as demand to keep both rotational power and forward velocity results in too high a demand, meaning the tractor mower will get bogged down. This exemplary embodiment in particular is measuring both optimized flow and pressure as noted.
[0162] If the pressure is lower than MaxP in step 520, the flow chart moves to a comparison of the flow reported by the at least one sensor in step 585 to the OQ value communicated in step 590, this comparison is made at step 580. If the flow is greater than or equal to the optimized flow, the forward velocity of the attachment 100 and its carrier are increased at step 525 to decrease flow. This decreases the angular velocity of the flail component of the rotating components. The controller then returns as shown. If the flow measurement is less than the OQ limit, the system continues on to compare the pressure at step 530.
[0163] At step 530, the flow chart moves to a comparison of the pressure reported by the pressure sensors in step 515 to the OP value communicated in step 510, this is identical to the previous comparisons. If the sensed pressure (P) is lower than the optimized pressure, the system continues to increase the forward velocity of the carrier having the attachment 100 is increased via same step 525 and cycles back as shown. If the pressure is greater than the optimized pressure (OP) at step 530, the controller maintains the status quo through a cycle time in step 570. Upon completion of the cycle time at step 570, the method compares the pressure reading to the OP, it simply resets to sample again if the P equals the OP as shown or if it does not equal OP incrementally reduces speed V− at step 535 as a precautionary measure to prevent runaway increases in power.
[0164] If the pressure is greater than or equal to the optimized pressure (OP) at step 530, the controller maintains the status quo through a cycle time in step 570. Upon completion of the cycle time at step 570, the method compares the pressure reading to the OP at 590, it simply resets to sample again if the P equals the OP or if it does not equal OP incrementally reduces speed V− at step 535 as a precautionary measure to prevent runaway increases in velocity. Additionally, it would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that strict comparison of values in the steps as outlined can be equally accomplished utilizing bounded comparisons as previously noted. One non−limiting example, for instance, would be if the sensed pressure (SP) were within ten percent of the MaxP or the sensed pressure were within plus or minus five percent of the optimum pressure OP, the logic test results in a positive branch result.
[0165] If the sensed pressure (SP) is less than the optimum pressure (OP) or less than the defined bounds around the optimum pressure, the signal is sent to incrementally increase velocity (+V) of the vehicle at step 525. This signal can be actuated or implemented in a number of ways. In one exemplary embodiment, the signal mimics that of the controls found in the operator compartment 40 on a control input 310, such as that of a joystick which typically includes buttons to incrementally increase velocity on such a joystick. In a further exemplary embodiment, this signal can be implemented as a signal from the attachment 100 to the industrial vehicle 10 and the SMU 605 of the industrial vehicle, as shown in
[0166] Upon completion of the incremental speed adjustment +V in step 525 or upon the expiry of the cycle time and the implementation of V− in step 535, the method restarts receiving a refreshed instantaneous sensed pressure (SP) input and comparing it to the MaxP and OP as outlined. In this fashion, once the depth of cut and other parameters are set the instant invention allows for the controller 500 to maintain optimum work at the tool operating environment by measurement of the pressure being demanded by the system and instantaneous changes in that pressure in real time. In this fashion the instant invention envisions a smart work output controller with at least one sensors for instantaneously detecting work done at the attachment coupled to an industrial vehicle or device and adjusting the forward velocity or feed rate without operator intervention, the controller can thereby reduce the reliance upon highly skilled operators for a consistent, smooth work output from a given device or vehicle. The above method can be modified in an alternate embodiment to process pressure and flow measurements in parallel and the resulting OP/OQ map the output to a multivariate surface instead of simple curve.
[0167]
[0168] In still further non-limiting exemplary embodiments of the instant invention, additional sensors or alternative sensors detecting the rotational speed of the attachment motor can be utilized to determine work done by the tool. Rotational speeds of such motors are directly related to flow rates and motor displacement and this information could also be used as input into the controller. In such an alternate embodiment, optical sensors could be utilized if dust were minimized, rotational speed can also be measured magnetically or with a micro switch or similar sensor detecting rotational movement. Similarly, in further exemplary embodiments, direct measurement of work can be carried out in electric motors by measuring current flow or electrical frequency to the electric motor, thus in attachments utilizing electric motors, this could also be used as an indicator of the load being applied to the processing tool. This direct measurement of work can then be incorporated into the instant invention and the controller of the exemplary embodiment directly.
[0169] The embodiments and examples discussed herein are non-limiting examples. The invention is described in detail with respect to preferred embodiments, and it will now be apparent from the foregoing to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications can be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects, and the invention, therefore, as defined in the claims is intended to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit of the invention.