Process for Performing Floating Point Multiply-Accumulate Operations with Precision Based on Exponent Differences for Saving Power

Abstract

A process for a floating point multiplier-accumulator (MAC) is operative on N pairs of floating point values using N MAC processes operating concurrently, each MAC process operating on a pair of values comprising an input value and a coefficient value. Each MAC process simultaneously generates an integer form fraction accompanied by a sign bit and an exponent difference computed by subtracting an exponent sum from a maximum exponent sum of all exponent sums. A range estimating process determines a possible range of values from the exponent differences and determines an adder precision. A summing process adds all of the integer form fractions using the determined adder precision, and converts the sum to a floating point value using the maximum exponent sum, sign bit of the summed integer form fractions, and optionally performs a 2's complement of the summed integer form fraction if the sign bit is negative.

Claims

1. A process for performing floating point multiplier-accumulator (MAC) operations on N pairs of values, each pair of values comprising an input value and a coefficient value, the process comprising: computing, for each of the N pairs, an exclusive OR operation performed on a sign bit of the input value and a sign bit of the coefficient value and generating a sign bit; computing, for each of the N pairs of values, an integer multiplication of a mantissa of the input value and a mantissa of the coefficient value and outputting a fraction; computing, for each of the N pairs of values, an exponent difference between a maximum exponent sum from all exponent sums of the N pairs an exponent sum for a pair of values; performing, for each of the N pairs of values: a pad operation by pre-pending 0 values and appending 0 values to an associated fraction to form a first value; complementing the first value if an associated sign bit is negative to generate a second value; shifting the second value to the right by an associated exponent difference value to generate a PCS value; computing a sum of all PCS values to form a PCS sum; normalizing the PCS sum, extracting a final sign bit from the normalized PCS sum, performing a 2s complement of the normalized PCS sum if the sign bit is negative to form a final mantissa; concatenating the final sign bit, final mantissa, and a final exponent computed from an adjusted maximum exponent, number of leading 0s in the sum of all PCS values, and number of PCS pre-pended 0s into a final floating point result.

2. The process of claim 1 where a fraction of each of the N pairs of values has a precision determined by the exponent difference.

3. The process of claim 2 where a fraction of each of the N pairs of values has a precision of 4 bits when an associated exponent difference is greater than 24.

4. The process of claim 2 where a fraction of each of the N pairs of values has a precision of 8 bits when an associated exponent difference is greater than 21.

5. The process of claim 1 where a fraction of each of the N pairs of values has a precision of 12 bits when an associated exponent difference is larger than 12.

6. The process of claim 1 where an exponent difference for a MAC processor that does not have a largest exponent sum is incremented if an associated integer multiplication does not overflow and an associated exponent difference is 0.

7. The process of claim 1 where an exponent difference for a MAC processor that does not have a largest exponent sum is decremented if an associated integer multiplication has an overflow and an associated exponent difference is greater than 0.

8. The process of claim 1 where the maximum exponent is incremented if an exponent difference is 0 and an associated multiplication has an overflow.

9. The process of claim 1 where an estimate of minimum value and maximum value is based on an associated exponent difference.

10. The process of claim 1 where computing the sum of PCS values is done with a variable precision based on an estimate of mantissa range.

11. The process of claim 9 where a sum of minimum values and a sum of maximum values determines a precision of a computed sum of PCS values.

12. The process of claim 11 where a computed sum of PCS values has a full precision and a less than full precision, and the less than full precision is enabled when a sum of exponent processor maximum values and a sum of exponent processor minimum values are either both positive values or both negative values.

13. The process of claim 11 where the computed sum of PCS values is performed using configurable cascadable 8 bit adders.

14. The process of claim 13 where the sum of all PCS values is computed in at least one of a 16 bit mode, a 24 bit mode, and a 32 bit mode.

15. A process for a floating point multiplier-accumulator (MAC) multiplying and accumulating N pairs of values, each pair of values comprising an input value and a coefficient value, the process operative on a plurality N of MAC processes, each MAC process receiving an input value and a corresponding coefficient value, each MAC process comprising: a sign process operative to perform an exclusive OR on a sign bit of the input value and a sign bit of the coefficient value and output a sign bit; a mantissa process configured to perform an integer multiplication of a hidden bit restored mantissa of the input value with a hidden bit restored mantissa of the coefficient value and output a fraction, upon a fraction overflow condition, the mantissa process dividing the output fraction by two and asserting an exponent increment; an exponent process generating an exponent sum of an exponent of the input value and an exponent of the coefficient value, the exponent process receiving a maximum exponent from a centralized find maximum exponent process, the exponent process modifying the maximum exponent and also outputting an exponent difference computed by subtracting the exponent sum from the maximum exponent, the exponent process also using the exponent difference and sign bit to estimate a minimum value and a maximum value; a Pad, Complement, Shift (PCS) process receiving the output fraction from the mantissa process and also the sign bit from the sign process, the PCS process configured to pad the fraction by pre-pending and appending 0s to the fraction to generate a first value, thereafter generating a second value by performing a two's complement of the first value if the sign bit is negative and otherwise taking no action on the first value, the PCS process configured to performing a shift operation on the second value by right shifting the second value by the exponent difference to generate a PCS output; the centralized find maximum exponent process receiving an exponent sum from each exponent process of the first pipeline stage, the centralized find maximum exponent process outputting a maximum exponent value corresponding to a maximum exponent process sum; a central range process operative to sum minimum values from the exponent process and also to sum maximum values from each exponent generator, the central range process forming an adder precision based on the sum of minimum values and the sum of maximum values; an adder process summing N PCS output values to a single value, the adder process configured to perform addition using the adder precision; a final stage process normalizing the single value, generating a final stage mantissa by performing a 2s complement of the single value if the single value is negative, generating a final stage sign bit, and concatenating the final stage sign bit, final stage mantissa, and adjusted maximum exponent into a MAC result.

16. The process of claim 15 where the exponent process computes a mantissa precision based on the exponent difference.

17. The process of claim 16 where the mantissa precision is 4 bits when the exponent difference is greater than 24.

18. The process of claim 16 where the mantissa precision is 8 bits when the exponent difference is greater than 21.

19. The process of claim 16 where the mantissa precision is 12 bits when the exponent difference is larger than 12.

10. The process of claim 15 where the adjusted maximum exponent is 8 bits and equal to the maximum exponent less a number of left shifts to remove leading 0s of the single value which were not pre-pended by the PCS process, less 127.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0062] FIGS. 1A and 1B show a block diagram for a pipelined floating point multiplier according to a first example of the invention.

[0063] FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a sign processor.

[0064] FIG. 3 shows a block diagram for a mantissa processor.

[0065] FIG. 4 shows a block diagram for an exponent processor.

[0066] FIG. 5 shows a block diagram for a pad, complement, shift (PCS) processor.

[0067] FIG. 6 shows a block diagram for a variable precision adder used in FIGS. 1A and 1B.

[0068] FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D show a flowchart for a process according to the present invention.

[0069] FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C show a block diagram for a pipelined floating point multiplier according to a second example of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0070] FIG. 1A shows a block diagram for a first example Unit Element (UE) 100 of the present invention. The previously described dot product multiplication-accumulation is performed on individual columns of the B coefficient matrix, each multiplier-accumulator (MAC) multiplying and accumulating the A row (input) matrix by one of the B column (coefficient) matrices known and is known as a “unit element” (UE) performing a MAC function which generates a single sum of input/coefficient products in floating point format. In the present example the complete MAC comprises m such unit elements, each of the m unit elements operating on a unique coefficient column k of the m coefficient columns as:

[00002]$\begin{array}{cccc}[a_1& a_2& .Math.& a_n].Math.\left[\begin{array}{c}{b}_{1k}\\ .Math.\\ b_{\mathrm{nk}}\end{array}\right]=\left[a_1{b}_{1k}+a_2{b}_{2k}+.Math.+a_n{b}_{\mathrm{nk}}\right]\end{array}$

[0071] An input row vector 101 such as [a.sub.1 a.sub.2 . . . a.sub.n] and one of the columns of the coefficient matrix 103

[00003]$\left[\begin{array}{c}{b}_{1k}\\ .Math.\\ b_{\mathrm{nk}}\end{array}\right]$

is input to the MAC 100 of FIGS. 1A and 1B, which comprises N simultaneously operating pipeline stages comprising first pipeline stage 150 coupled to a respective second pipeline stage 152 and an adder stage 154. The adder stage 154 may be performed separately since there are N second pipeline stages 152 outputting results into a binary tree of adders, for example 8 adders 124 feeding 4 adders 140 feeding 2 adders 142 and a final single adder 144. For this reason, the adder stage 1154 is shown separate from the second pipeline stage, where each of the N pipeline stages 150 and 152 contains identical processing blocks and Max Exp 112 is a separate processor receiving inputs from all exponent processors 106.

[0072] Each MAC processor comprises a MAC processor first pipeline stage 150 and a MAC processor second pipeline stage 152. The MAC processors of 150 and 152 are followed by a common adder stage 154 which receives integer form fractions 156 from all of the MAC processors and forms the single accumulated floating point output value 148. A central find maximum exponent processor 112 receives inputs from all of the exponent processors to generate a maximum exponent sum 164, and a central range estimator 162 receives minimum and maximum estimated ranges from all of the MAC processors to generate an estimated minimum and maximum range for the purpose of determining required adder precision.

[0073] MAC processor first stage 150 separates the components (sign, exponent, and mantissa) from the pair of multiplicands (in the present example, one of the example sixteen input 101 terms and a corresponding coefficient 103 term), each term a floating point value comprising a sign bit, 8 exponent bits and 7 mantissa bits). Each of the exemplar N input terms from 101 and corresponding N coefficient terms from 103 are provided to a separate one of the 16 pipeline stages 150/152, each input term and coefficient term separated into sign, exponent, and mantissa component for processing by a respective pipeline stages.

[0074] An example floating point value may be represented by:

−1.sup.S*(1+b.sub.n*2.sup.−1+b.sub.n-1*2.sup.−2+ . . . +b.sub.0*2.sup.−n)*2.sup.E

[0075] where S is the sign bit, and [bn . . . b0] is the mantissa (for n bits), and E is the exponent (as an unsigned integer, in the range 0-255 unsigned representing an exponent range −127 to +128 in the present examples). It is important to note that the mantissa leading term 1 which precedes b.sub.n*2.sup.−1 in the above expression is known as a “hidden bit” in the representation of the floating point number, as it is implied by the floating point format but is not expressly present in the floating point format. Accordingly, the range of a mantissa of the above format is always in the range from 1.0 to less than 2.0. These floating point format examples and N=16 adder tree of FIGS. 1A and 1B are set forth as examples for understanding the invention, although the invention can be practiced with any number of exponent bits and any number of mantissa bits.

[0076] Each first pipeline stage 150 has a sign bit processor 105 and sign bit (XOR) register 107, a mantissa processor 104 and fraction register 108, and an exponent processor 106. The Find Max Exponent 112 function is shown in dashed lines as it is a separate module which receives exponent sums from all N stages of exponent processor 106 and provides its MAX_EXP output 164 representing the maximum exponent from among the exponent processors 106 to all exponent processors 106.

[0077] FIG. 2 shows the sign bit processor 105. Each of the N first pipeline stages 150 receives a corresponding pair of sign bits from a respective Input 101 and associated Coefficient 103 floating point term and performs an XOR 110 (noted as ⊕) of the sign bits to generate a sign bit 160, such that for each pair of sign bits, XOR of sign processor 105 operates according to 0⊕+0=0; 0⊕+1=1; 1⊕+0=1; 1⊕+1=0 to generate the sign bit 160 associated with a multiplicand pair.

[0078] FIG. 3 shows the first pipeline stage mantissa processor 104. The mantissa processor 104 inputs a pair of 7 bit associated mantissa components from floating point input 101 and floating point coefficient 103, restores the “hidden bit” and generates a 16 bit integer mantissa multiply result as an output to fraction pipeline register 108. Mantissas represent a range from 1.0 to 1.99× (with hidden bit as 1.X), where X is specific to the floating point format. For example, the maximum value for a bfloat16 type is 1.9921875, the maximum value for a half precision type (FP16) is 1.9990234375, and the maximum value for a single precision type (FP32) is 1.9999998807907104, formats which are all described in the IEEE standard 754, “Standard for Floating Point Arithmetic”. The multiplication of the two floating point values may generate a result as large as 3.99Y (Y indicating additional digits not shown), which requires a scaling by 2 to bring the multiplication result into a range less than 2.0. Such an overflow and scaling from mantissa multiplication 104 is handled by overflow adjustment 302, which scales the result by 2 and generates the EXP_INC bit 113. EXP_INC 113 is delivered through register 110 with exponent processor results, where the PCS processor 122 uses it in combination with (EXP_DIFF), handled by the second pipeline PCS Processor 122. The normalized output of the Mantissa processor in the range 1.0 to 1.X is coupled to the fraction pipeline register 108 for delivery to the second pipeline stage.

[0079] FIG. 1A first pipeline stage exponent processor 106 is shown in detail in FIG. 4. Exponent processor 104 computes the sum of the exponents extracted from the input 101 and coefficient 103 terms for each of the N first pipeline stages 107, each simultaneously handling the respective one of the input and coefficient pairs, and operates with commonly shared find max exponent finder 112, which receives exponent sums 402 from all N first pipeline stages and outputs the largest exponent 164 from among all first stage exponent sums, known as an initial MAX_EXP, which may be subject to modification before presentation as MAX_exp 113. The compute exponent difference 406 returns an initial difference 404 between the MAX_EXP 164 and the current exponent sum output 402 for each of the N exponent processors. The exponent processor 106 associated with the stage having the largest MAX_EXP will have an exponent difference (EXP_DIFF) 404 value of 0.

[0080] Exponent Difference Adjustment 406 is operative to modify EXP_DIFF (Max_Exp-curr_exp) 404 and MAX_EXP 154 as described below to generate the Exp_Diff output 115 and MAX_EXP 130A according to the method of FIG. 7B, such that:

[0081] EXP_DIFF 115 is generated by incrementing Max_exp-current 404 if EXP_INC 113 is not asserted and the current stage is also the largest exponent (path 728 of FIG. 7B);

[0082] EXP_DIFF 115 is generated by decrementing max-current 404 if EXP_INC 113 is asserted and the current station is not the largest exponent sum (path 729 of FIG. 7B).

[0083] MAX_EXP increments if EXP_INC is asserted and the current station is also the largest exponent (path 732 of FIG. 7B).

[0084] Each exponent processor 106 generates an output range_est 117 derived from the exponent difference 404 and sign bit 166, and also generates an output Reg_en 111 derived from the exponent difference 404. These signals are used to reduce power consumption for certain cases that may come up frequently in floating point multiply-accumulate operations. The larger the exponent difference for a particular stage performing one of the N multiplications, the less likely that particular component will influence the accumulated result compared to contributions by multiplication results from pipeline stages with exponent differences closer to 0, and energy can be saved by not toggling register or processor bits for contributions with lower significance. In an example of the invention, Reg_en 111 controls the number of bits processed in the fraction register 108 or optionally mantissa processor 104 based on exponent difference. In one example of the invention shown in FIG. 4, exponent differences greater than 24 use only the most significant 4 bits of the mantissa processor, exponent differences from 21 to 24 use only the most significant 8 bits of the mantissa processor, exponent differences from 17 to 20 use only the most significant 12 bits of the mantissa processor, and exponent differences less than 16 use all bits of the mantissa processor. These examples are given for illustration only, and other numbers of significant bits which increase in number with decreasing exponent difference may be used.

[0085] One important feature of exponent summing is that each 8 bit exponent of a floating point format has an exponent range from 0-255 decimal, representing an exponent range from −127 to 128, whereas the exponent sum is being done as unsigned numbers for simplicity in the current example of the invention. Accordingly, when multiplying two floating point numbers A and B with exponents EXP_A and EXP_B, the values represented by the exponent sum as (EXP_A−127)+(EXP_B−127), but when adding these as unsigned integers for simplicity as in the present application, the second −127 must be compensated before forming the exponent in the final stage. This compensation may be done at each MAC Processor exponent processor, or at the final stage before presenting the floating point MAC result. In the present invention, for an 8 bit exponent value, subtracting 127 for this compensation may be done either at each MAC processor exponent processor, or the compensation may be done once at the final output stage 146 by subtracting 127 from MAX_EXP 130 when the leading bit adjustments of normalizing the integer form fraction 168 is done. While not explicitly described in the N exponent processors 106 or the single normalizing stage 146, it is understood that this compensation may be done in either location.

[0086] Additionally, the adders 154 do not require full precision if the range of values being added results in a narrow range of possible values, as the lower significant bits of the addition operations similarly do not require as great an adder precision, which can be an additional source of power savings by not enabling those additional bits. In another example of the invention, the adders 124, 140, 142, and 144 are 32 bit adders comprised of a cascaded series of four 8 bit adders which can be enabled independently starting with the most significant 8 bits and adding subsequent 8 bit additional adders. In this embodiment, the exponent processor 106 generates a range estimate 106 based on identifying the smallest signed value and the largest signed value that each mantissa processor and exponent generator could produce by examination of the exponent difference only, combined with the sign bit. Each stage computes its possible signed smallest and largest values, which are added together by overall range estimator 162 to enable an appropriate adder precision, with the example 8 bit adders enabled from most significant adder to least significant adder using the adder_en signal 120. As a simplified example, if N=4 and each stage range estimator 408 generates the (min,max) values (8,16), (−64,−32), (4,8), and (8,16), the central range estimator 162 will estimate a range of (−44, 8). Since this range crosses 0, the summed value could include very small values such as 0.00001, requiring full precision (32 bit in the present example) of the adders. If the second value were (84,168) instead of (−64,−32), the range would be (84,168) (a single power of two different) indicating that the adders require less precision, such as the minimum of two 8 bit adders for 16 bits of precision. The relationship between overall range and number of adders enabled by the central range estimator 162 may be determine in any manner which preserves accuracy. In one example of the invention, an overall estimated range which includes a negative lower value and positive upper value results in adder_en enabling all adders, whereas an overall range which is entirely negative or positive enables fewer than all adders, such as two or three adders. Where the range is entirely positive or entirely negative, and has an upper extent which is separated by a multiple of more than 2.sup.7 or 2.sup.8 times the lower extent, enabling one or preferably two 8 bit adders may be used, and if the upper extent is separated by less than a multiple of more than 2.sup.7 or 2.sup.8 times the lower extent, enabling two or three adders may be used. In this manner, the adders 124, 140, 142, and 144 operate with variable precision depending on the result of the central range estimator.

[0087] The adders 124, 140, 142, and 144 summing the N outputs of the N second pipeline stage 152 PCS processor 122 are shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B for the case N=16, such that for full precision selected by adder_en, adder 124 is operating on 8 pairs of 32 bit values, adder 140 is operating on the resulting 4 pairs of 32 bit values, adder 142 is operating on the resulting 2 pairs of 32 bit values, and adder 144 is operating on the final pair of values to generate an output. In an example of the invention, all adders of an adder tree operate with a precision governed by adder_en.

[0088] The Pad, Complement, Shift (PCS) Processor 122 is shown in the block diagram of FIG. 5. A first stage 502 performs padding of mantissa 114 to add leading 0s and trailing 0s. In one example of the invention, the mantissa 114 is 16 bit and the padding is to 32 bits, typically zero padding the most significant bits according to the number of adder stages to prevent adder overflow in adder stages 124, 140, 142, 144 of adder section 154 of FIG. 1A.

[0089] In this manner, each of the N first pipeline stages of FIG. 1A outputs a sign bit 160, normalized mantissa product 114, exponent difference 118, and MAX_EXP value 130, all of which are provided to the second pipeline stage 152.

[0090] The second pipeline stage 152 is operative to receive the corresponding first pipeline stage outputs and perform additional operations. The mantissa Pad/Complement Shift (PCS) stage 122 receives the normalized mantissa value 114 from the first pipeline stage 150, and performs a first step of padding, whereby a fixed number of 0s is prepended and a fixed number of 0s is appended. Prepending leading 0s is done to maintain the range and precision of the summed result to prevent subsequent overflows during addition of the results from the example N=16 second pipeline stages during adder stage 154. For the addition of N=16 integers, an optimal padding of four prepended leading 0s is sufficient to prevent an overflow error during the addition of the 16 normalized mantissas. For an example 32 bit integer form fraction, the normalized mantissa integer 114 having 16 bits may be padded with 4 0 bits prepended (to accommodate 16 maximum non-overflow addition operations), and 12 0s may be appended to form a first integer form fraction of 32 bits. In general, the bit size after padding (shown as 32 in the present example, motivated by the use of four 8 bit adders which are individually enabled by Adder_en 120 from FIG. 4 stage 408 according to central range estimator 162) is a function of the multiplier output fraction width (16 bits in this example), the number of additions (16 in the present example, so the number of prepended padding bits is log base 2 of 16=4), and number of lower bits to preserve to maintain a desired accuracy during the mantissa additions. Alternatively, for a MAC summing 32 products, we have 5 (log.sub.2 32) prepended 0s+11 (appended 0s)+16 (bit precision of addition)=32 bits through the adders 124, 140, 142, 144. In other examples of the invention, the integer form fractions 156 output by the Mantissa PCS stage 122 may range from 16 to 32 bits or an even wider range, depending on these parameters. Following the first step 502 of padding described above and shown in FIG. 5, a second stage of PCS 122 is to substitute a two's complement of the first integer form fraction if the sign bit 160 is negative in step 504, otherwise the first integer form fraction output by stage 502 remains unmodified. A third stage of PCS 122 is to perform a right shift by the number of positions indicated by adjusted exponent difference EXP_Diff 118 from exponent processor 106 of FIG. 1A and FIG. 4.

[0091] The third step mantissa shift stage 506 of FIG. 1 122 is governed by Exp_diff 118 from the exponent processor 106 and pipeline register 110 of FIG. 4 with the modifications which generate Exp_Diff 118 and MAX_EXP 130 as previously described for FIGS. 4 and 7B. EXP_DIFF 118 determines how many bit positions the associated mantissa will right shift in shift processor 506 according to the Exp_Diff 118.

[0092] The N output values from the Mantissa PCS 122 stage are summed in adder stage 154 as a binary tree of adders 124, 140, 142, and 144, resulting in a single integer form fraction value sent to output stage 146. If the integer form fraction 168 input to 146 is negative, then a negative sign bit component is generated, and a 2s complement of the integer form fraction 168 input to 146 is generated, along with a normalization step to round the integer form fraction 168 to the nearest 7 bit mantissa value and truncated to the mantissa component output format, in the present example, 7 bits (without hidden “1.” bit as previously described), and the exponent component is the MAX_EXP 130 output by exponent difference adjustment stage 406 with decimal 127 subtracted and also subtracting the number of leading 0s (ignoring the number of padded 0s) and left shifting the mantissa in one example of the invention. The number of pre-pended 0s of the PCS stage are removed during normalization, but not used in computing the adjusted exponent of the final MAC floating point result. If the integer form fraction input to output stage 146 is positive, the sign bit component is 0, the mantissa component is rounded and truncated to the number of bits required, and the exponent component is computed as before. The floating point output value is then the sign bit component, the exponent component, and the mantissa component according to the standard format previously described for floating point numbers.

[0093] FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D show the operation of the unit element MAC as a process 700 for computing floating point accumulated value for a sum of products of floating point input I floating point coefficient C, such that P=I.sub.1C.sub.1+I.sub.nC.sub.n+ . . . +I.sub.NC.sub.N. Step 702 computes a determination of MAX_EXP from the sum of exponent terms for each product term across the floating point exponent component of all N terms. Step 704 initiates a series of steps 706, 708, 710, 712, 714, 716, 718, and FIG. 7B steps of the adjustment stage compute any changes in MAX_EXP and EXP_DIFF, with FIG. 7C 740, 742, 744, 746, and 748 performed for each of the N product terms.

[0094] Step 706 is the separation of sign, mantissa, and exponent, as was previously described in FIG. 1A. Step 708 performs the sign bit process of sign processor 105, performing an exclusive OR of the sign bits and returning a sign bit for later use in step 742. The mantissa processor 104 operations include step 710 which restores the hidden mantissa bits prior to multiplication 712, and normalization 714, corresponding to mantissa processor 104 of FIG. 1A as previously described. The mantissa is normalized 714, which also generates the MAX_EXP value previously described. The exponent sum 716 is computed for each result by the exponent processors 106, or preferably is provided for each of the N product terms as part of step 702, which performed this step as part of determining MAX_EXP. The exponent difference (EXP_DIFF) from MAX_EXP is computed in step 718, which leads to step 719 of FIG. 7B.

[0095] FIG. 7B shows the exponent difference adjustment stage 406 of FIG. 4 for each of the N second pipeline stages of FIG. 1A. Step 720 EXP_DIFF=0 indicates adjustment steps 723 for a stage with the largest exponent sum, specifically incrementing MAX_EXP 732 if EXP_INC is set 730, which also causes a flag MAX_INC to be distributed to other stages. Where multiple stages satisfy the test EXP_DIFF=0 of 723 (multiple stages have the same maximum sum of input exponent and coefficient exponent), and multiple of these same stages have EXP_INC=1, MAX_EXP only increments once 732 and the value EXP_DIFF=0 remains unchanged (733, 735). Stages which do not have the MAX_EXP (indicated by EXP_DIFF>0 720), are processed as shown in 721, where the combination of EXP_INC=1 and MAX_INC not set 725 result in decrementing EXP_DIFF 729, and stages which have MAX_INC set with EXP_INC not set increment EXP_DIFF 728. Other combinations of EXP_INC and MAX_INC do not adjust EXP_DIFF 726.

[0096] FIG. 7C shows a continuation of processing of FIG. 7B, showing the mantissa PCS steps of PCS processor 122 of FIG. 1A, with the steps of padding 740, conditional ones complement 744 if the sign bit is negative 742 from step 708, shifting by EXP_DIFF in step 746, and the output of a single integer form fraction in step 748. Each of the N product terms generates the integer form fraction output 748.

[0097] FIG. 7D shows the summing 746 of all product terms output in step 748, after which the sum is normalized to 8 bits, sign adjustments made (taking the two's complement and setting the sign bit to 1 if a negative sum results), and adjusting the exponent, as was described in step 146 of FIG. 1B.

[0098] FIGS. 1A and 1B describe an embodiment where an incoming N (shown for the case N=16) pairs of floating point values comprising a floating point input 101 and floating point coefficient 103 are processed simultaneously by N first pipeline stages, N second pipeline stages, and an adder stage 119 simultaneously sums N/2 integer form fractions in a first stage, N/4 integer form fractions in a second stage, and 2 integer form fractions in a final stage, performing the additions in a binary tree, shown for N=16. Other variations of the invention are possible. For example, a single instance of first pipeline stage 107 and second pipeline stage 109 may be used in sequence with each coefficient pair, the output values being sent to an accumulating adder stage 119, which simply adds the new result to the previous one N for each of the N cycles until complete, with the normalization 146 occurring as before. However the order of operations is performed, MAX_EXP for the sum of exponents of the N pairs of floating point values must be determined prior to the sequential processing. In this case, a separate MAX_EXP processor which determines MAX_EXP may be used to scan the N pairs of exponents.

[0099] In a second example of the invention shown in FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C, a problem is addressed whereby the summed integer form fractions from PCS 122 may sum to a value close to zero, resulting in a mantissa that is limited by the adder tree 802 resolution and PCS processor 122 output resolution. However, power consumption is increased by having all of the adder tree 802 operations and PCS processor 122 operations performed continuously on full resolution mantissas to avoid the risk of having them sum to a value with a large number of leading 0 bits. It is desired to detect the “near zero” sum condition and thereafter perform the PCS function on a greater number of bits. In this embodiment of the invention, the previous processing is performed the same as was described in FIG. 1A, however the PCS processor 122 provides a first bitwidth output 803 and a second bitwidth output 805 which has greater precision (bits) than the first bitwidth. The first bitwidth output 803 and second bitwidth output 805 may be provided concurrently (since the only the additional bits to form the second bitwidth output need to be added), or in a separate calculation so that the PCS processor computes a result with the second bitwidth only after it is detected that the summed result 807 has an excess number of leading zeros. By way of example, FIG. 8A shows the PCS processor 122 generating a first bitwidth output 803 of 20 bits and a second bitwidth output 805 of 40 bits. The 20 bit output 803 is passed directly to the example 20 bit adder tree 802 which adds the N values together to form a single value 807, which is passed to normalizer and leading zero detector 808. If a threshold ratio of leading 0s to first bitwidth in sum 807 is crossed, such as 50% or 75%, then normalizer and leading zero detector 808 asserts a stall condition 810, during which time the values stored in the second bitwidth pipeline register 804, which contains N second bitwidth values (with greater precision than the N first bitwidth values that resulted in the summed value threshold detection and stall condition) are sent to the second bitwidth adder tree 806 and the single resulting sum is sent to normalizer 809, and the normalized floating point value 820 is generated as an output.

[0100] FIG. 8B shows the normalizer function of 808 and 809 of FIG. 8A (and 146 of FIG. 1A). As was previously described, the normalizer function 808 and 809 (and 146) generates a floating point final value from the summed value from the adder tree and MAX_EXP value. If the final sum value 809 or 809 (or 168), is negative then a 2's complement is performed which sets the final sign bit accordingly, next the leading zeros are removed with the number of leading 0s subtracted from MAX_EXP to form a final exponent, the hidden bit is removed, and the fraction is rounded to the nearest 7 bit mantissa to form a final mantissa. The final result 812 or 814 (or 148) is formed by concatenating the final sign bit, the final mantissa, and final exponent. As was mentioned previously, the addition of exponent values (with range −127 to +128) as unsigned integers requires subtracting 127 from the adjusted sum to avoid a double bias. Subtracting 127 from the exponent sum may be done at the final normalization stage, or at each exponent processor before the final normalization. Furthermore, the number of leading 0s of the PCS processor padding are not considered in the leading 0 exponent adjustment, and fewer leading 0s cause the final result floating point exponent to be increased. For example, for an 8 bit exponent, if P=number of pad bits of the PCS processor padding step, M=number of leading 0s of the final adder tree output, then the final stage floating point exponent would be exponent difference −127−(M−P).

[0101] FIG. 8C shows an example dual 40b/80b adder tree, where each adder 822, 824, 826, 828 (for N=16) is cascaded as shown, with each adder controlled by a mode bit 816 that selects operation between the first bitwidth and the second bitwidth, and which may be used for adder tree

[0102] The present examples are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the invention to only the embodiments shown. For example, the apparatus may be practiced as N pipeline stages operating concurrently, each pipeline stage forming an integer form fraction for use by a summing stage, with a first and second pipeline stage, so that each clock cycle generates a new MAC result. Alternatively, it is possible to scan the exponent sums to determine the MAC_EXP value, and thereafter to compute and sum each integer form fraction output from each Mantissa PCS stage separately, and accumulate each mantissa PCS output sequentially. The invention may be practiced as an apparatus or as a process without limitation to the examples provided merely for understanding the invention.