Abrasive tip blade manufacture methods
10309233 ยท 2019-06-04
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F01D5/288
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C23C24/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C28/044
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F01D11/122
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F01D5/28
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B05D3/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C23C24/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F01D11/12
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A method is disclosed for manufacturing a blade tip coating. The blade tip coating (152) comprising an abrasive (156) and a matrix (154). The method comprises forming a mixture comprising the abrasive, a precursor of the matrix, and an additional particulate (158). The mixture is pressed, the additional particulate acting as a stop to limit thickness reduction of the mixture.
Claims
1. A method for manufacturing an airfoil tip coating, the airfoil tip coating comprising an abrasive and a matrix, the method comprising: forming a mixture comprising the abrasive, a precursor of the matrix, and an additional particulate; and pressing the mixture, the additional particulate having a larger characteristic size than the abrasive and acting as a stop to limit thickness reduction of the mixture.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: curing the precursor of the matrix.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: releasing a release member from the mixture.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the airfoil comprises: a root end and a tip; and a substrate along at least a portion of the airfoil, and the method comprises: applying the mixture to the tip.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein: the pressing comprises pressing a member against the applied mixture, the additional particulate acting as a stop to limit proximity of the member to the substrate.
6. The method of claim 5 further comprising: curing the precursor of the matrix; and releasing the tip coating from the member.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein: the tip coating is a first layer; and the method further comprises forming a second layer having a lower abrasive content than the first layer.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein: the second layer is formed atop the first layer by: forming a second mixture comprising a second abrasive, a second matrix precursor, and a second additional particulate; and pressing the second mixture, the second additional particulate acting as a stop to limit thickness reduction of the second mixture.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein: the tip coating has a content of the abrasive of at least twenty volume percent; and the tip coating has a content of the additional particulate of three volume percent to ten volume percent.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein: the additional particulate has characteristic diameter of 0.20 mm to 0.80 mm; and the abrasive has a characteristic size of ten micrometers to 150 micrometers.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein: the additional particulate is glass bead.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein: the abrasive is at least 50 percent by weight oxide of one or more of aluminum, titanium, and zirconium.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein: the tip coating has a characteristic thickness of 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm.
14. The method of claim 4 wherein: prior to the applying, a release agent is between the first release member and the mixture and the second release member and the mixture; and the release agent comprises polydimethylsiloxane polymer.
15. The method of claim 1 further comprising: after applying the tip coating, applying a polymeric coating to a pressure side and a suction side of the airfoil.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein: the polymeric coating is also applied atop the tip coating.
17. A method for manufacturing a coating, the coating comprising an abrasive and a matrix, the method comprising: forming a mixture comprising the abrasive, a precursor of the matrix, and an additional particulate; and pressing the mixture, the additional particulate being beads and acting as a stop to limit thickness reduction of the mixture.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein: the beads are glass beads.
19. The method of claim 17 wherein: the matrix comprises an epoxy; and the abrasive is at least 50 percent by weight oxide of one or more of aluminum, titanium, and zirconium.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9) Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(10)
(11) The core flowpath 522 proceeds downstream to an engine outlet 36 through one or more compressor sections, a combustor, and one or more turbine sections. The exemplary engine has two axial compressor sections and two axial turbine sections, although other configurations are equally applicable. From upstream to downstream there is a low pressure compressor section (LPC) 40, a high pressure compressor section (HPC) 42, a combustor section 44, a high pressure turbine section (HPT) 46, and a low pressure turbine section (LPT) 48. Each of the LPC, HPC, HPT, and LPT comprises one or more stages of blades which may be interspersed with one or more stages of stator vanes.
(12) In the exemplary engine, the blade stages of the LPC and LPT are part of a low pressure spool mounted for rotation about the axis 500. The exemplary low pressure spool includes a shaft (low pressure shaft) 50 which couples the blade stages of the LPT to those of the LPC and allows the LPT to drive rotation of the LPC. In the exemplary engine, the shaft 50 also drives the fan. In the exemplary implementation, the fan is driven via a transmission (not shown, e.g., a fan gear drive system such as an epicyclic transmission) to allow the fan to rotate at a lower speed than the low pressure shaft.
(13) The exemplary engine further includes a high pressure shaft 52 mounted for rotation about the axis 500 and coupling the blade stages of the HPT to those of the HPC to allow the HPT to drive rotation of the HPC. In the combustor 44, fuel is introduced to compressed air from the HPC and combusted to produce a high pressure gas which, in turn, is expanded in the turbine sections to extract energy and drive rotation of the respective turbine sections and their associated compressor sections (to provide the compressed air to the combustor) and fan.
(14)
(15)
(16) The exemplary rub material 124 comprises a polymeric matrix material 128 and a filler 130 (e.g., polymeric particles or micro-balloons or glass micro-balloons). The exemplary rub material may be formed as a coating on an ID surface 132 of a substrate 134 of the liner assembly. An exemplary substrate 134 is titanium alloy AMS 4911. The rub material is shown as having an overall thickness T.sub.R. Exemplary T.sub.R is 1-10 mm, more particularly, 3-6 mm. Alternative abradable rub material may include metal matrix composites (e.g., formed by thermal spray coating).
(17)
(18) The matrix is a hardenable/curable non-metallic matrix material. In one example, the matrix (or precursor) is initially in a fluid state (e.g., a viscous liquid) and is mixed with the abrasive 156 and the additional particulate 158. The mixture is then applied to the surface 150 to a thickness (at least average) greater than T.sub.C. To provide uniform initial T.sub.C, the mixture may be compressed. Exemplary compression involves compressing against a release member and/or a sacrificial member. The exemplary release member may bear a release coating to facilitate its release from the matrix. The release member is then compressed against the substrate until the release member and substrate bottom out relative to each other held separated by the additional particulate 158 (e.g., if circular particles, the release member and substrate will be separated by the particle diameter (subject to slight deformation etc.)). The matrix precursor may be allowed to fully or partially harden or cure. The release member may then be removed (e.g., peeled off), leaving an essentially uniformly thick coating of the desired initial thickness T.sub.C. The release member may potentially be reusable (e.g., if a metallic strip) or may be disposable. Alternative sacrificial members may not be releasably removable but may be removed by other means such as chemical means or abrading.
(19)
(20) Exemplary matrix material is an epoxy.
(21) Exemplary abrasive is a grit. Exemplary grit Mohs hardness is at least 7.5, more narrowly, at least 8.0. Exemplary grit composition comprises a by weight majority of one or more oxides, carbides, nitrides, carbo-nitrides, or diamond (e.g., alumina and/or zirconia or alumina-based and/or zirconia-based (e.g., at least 50% alumina and/or zirconia by weight or alumina or zirconia as a largest by-weight component with titania being a candidate addition), silicon carbide, silicon nitride, boron carbide, boron nitride, titanium carbide, titanium nitride, and the like. A characteristic particle size and morphology is 1 mil to 3 mil (25 micrometers to 76 micrometers), more broadly 10 micrometers to 150 micrometers 98 wt % pure alumina particles produced by fusing and crushing to form angular particles. Exemplary volume fraction for the grit is 22% of overall volume, more broadly, 10% to 50% by volume or 20% to 45% by volume.
(22) Exemplary spacers are beads. Exemplary beads are glass beads. Exemplary bead size is characteristic diameter of 0.012 inch (0.3 mm), more broadly 0.20 mm to 0.80 mm or 0.20 mm to 0.50 mm. Exemplary bead content for 0.012 inch (0.3 mm) diameter beads is 5% by volume, more broadly 1% to 20% by volume or 3% to 10% by volume. The volume fraction of beads required is reduced with smaller bead diameter (because at smaller bead size more contact points per area result from a given volume fraction). For non-spherical (e.g., generally ellipsoidal) dimension corresponding to the diameter would be the minor axis dimension.
(23) An exemplary release member is sheet metal strip or metallic foil (e.g., stainless steel). Exemplary release agent is polydimethylsiloxane polymer or a polytetrafluoroethylene.
(24) An exemplary manufacture process involves forming the blade substrate by conventional means (e.g., forging and/or machining and peening). Portions of the blade may be masked. For example, some blade configurations have a titanium leading edge separated from an aluminum substrate by a slight gap (e.g., epoxy-filled for galvanic isolation). The tip surface of the titanium leading edge member and the gap may be covered with the abrasive coating if it is not electrically conductive. Yet alternative blades may lack metallic substrates and the tip coating may be applied to a non-metallic portion such as a fiber composite.
(25)
(26) For holding the blade at the proper tilt orientation (e.g., tilt about axes generally near parallel to the chord), the fixture has a pressure side engagement feature 206 and a suction side engagement feature 208 respectively contacting the blade along the pressure side and the suction side closer to the root. As with the relationship of the leading edge stop to the trailing edge engagement feature, one of these may be rigid or fixed while the other is spring-loaded or otherwise movable. In this example, the pressure side engagement feature 206 is rigidly held while the suction side engagement feature 208 is spring-loaded and biased toward the pressure side engagement feature to clamp the blade between these engagement features. Exemplary engagement features comprise end members for actually contacting the blades. Exemplary end members are low-friction non-metallic pads (e.g., polyamide) or low-friction ball rollers.
(27) The exemplary leading edge stop 202 and engagement features 206 and 208 are both mounted on a single post 210 extending upward from the base 180.
(28)
(29) Relative to uncoated tips or alternative coatings the exemplary coating may have one or more of several advantages. For example, it may effectively cut the outer air seal abradable while maintaining low blade tip temperature resulting in survival of polymeric erosion-resistant coatings. It may provide an engineered wear ratio with the abradable (i.e., itself wear in length to produce a more round blade tip assembly and result in smaller average clearance and higher efficiency).
(30) An alternative embodiment involves pre-forming the tip coating (or a precursor layer thereof) with a desired thickness and then applying it to the blade tip. In one example, two release members are coated with release agent and the precursor mixture applied between the release members. The release members are then subject to a roller operation or other relative compressing to press the mixture between the release members. The additional particulate in the mixture again acts as a stop to limit thickness reduction of the mixture to the desired initial thickness. The mixture may then be fully or partially cured. One of the release members may then be disengaged from the at least partially cured mixture. To this end, it may be desirable that the two release members or associated release agents may be different in composition or thickness so as to allow one release member to be removed preferentially to the other. The remaining release member bearing the mixture is then applied to the blade tip and that release member may be removed. This may occur after a further curing to adhere the mixture to the tip. In various embodiments, the tip may be pre-coated with a primer or additional adhesive such as epoxy so as to facilitate bonding therebetween.
(31) Further variations involve multiple distinct layers of the tip coating. In one example, a non-abrasive layer is applied atop the abrasive coating. For example, this non-abrasive layer may be the same polymeric coating (e.g., polyurethane) applied to pressure and suction sides of the airfoil in the same application step. A purpose of such an additional layer may be to accommodate variations such as manufacturing tolerances in the radii of the blade tips relative to the engine axis.
(32) An alternative non-abrasive layer may be formed by an additional layer of the matrix material. This layer may be applied separately or may result from settling or other non-uniform distribution of abrasive within the matrix (see discussion below).
(33) In one example of manufacturing variances, a first blade substrate protrudes slightly more radially than a second blade substrate, if the first blade substrate is dimensioned so that its tip coating just abrades the liner, then there will be a gap between the tip coating of the second blade and the liner resulting in blowby and loss of efficiency. The non-abrasive layer fills this gap. If, instead, the shorter airfoil is dimensioned to just abrade the coating then there will be greater interference between the abrasive coating on the longer airfoil and the liner causing rapid wear of the liner and then similarly resulting in blowby. Accordingly, it may be desirable to select typical manufacturing tolerances so that only the longer blades within the variation will have interference of their abrasive coating layer with the liner. The non-abrasive layer on those longer blades will be quickly worn away without undue loss of liner material. Thereafter, the longer blades may account for a larger fraction of the liner wear while allowing the shorter blades to avoid blowby due to their intact non-abrasive outer layer.
(34) Another option for a multi-layer coating is to use a similar application process to that used for the layer 152. In this process, the additional particulate may be similar to that used in applying the first layer (although its size may be chosen to correspond to a desired size for the second layer). Abrasive may be totally eliminated or reduced relative to the abrasive content of the first layer. For example, an inboard abrasive layer may be chosen to have an abrasive concentration (e.g., of 30% by volume) and a thickness (e.g., of 10 mils (0.25 mm)) and an outboard abrasive layer may be chosen with a lower abrasive concentration (e.g., of 6% by volume). The outboard layer may have a different thickness such as a greater thickness (e.g., of 20 mils (0.5 mm)). The layers have wear ratios with the outer air seal that are proportional to their abrasive concentrations. During rub interaction, the wear rate of the abrasive tip will go down (e.g., by a factor of about five in this example) when the inboard layer becomes exposed.
(35) As is noted above, a varying content of abrasive may for example be achieved by settling or by other means such as applying separate layers. One example of a multi-layer system involves a progressive decrease in abrasive content from the inboard or base layer through the outboard layer. One example of such a system involves a hypothetical substitution for a single-layer system having 20% by volume abrasive in a layer 0.5 mm thick. This layer may be replaced with a two-layer system wherein all the abrasive is concentrated in the inboard layer (e.g., within the inboard half of the thickness). A lower/inboard layer may be applied 0.25 mm thick with 40% by volume abrasive and then the upper/outer layer of abrasive-free epoxy deposited 0.25 mm thick. Abrasive settling in a situation where the initial layer is applied 0.5 mm thick could achieve a similar result (or one with slightly more or slightly less bias of the abrasive toward the substrate).
(36) The variation in abrasive content from the substrate outward may be selected to achieve one or more of several purposes. For example, one implementation of a relatively highly abrasive outermost layer is to provide a coating that quickly rounds the adjacent fan case liner but is worn off in the process. Once the fan case liner is rounded, a lower abrasive content in what was previously an intermediate portion of the tip coating may have an advantageous set of properties. For example, it may still maintain the fan case temperature sufficiently low and still maintain sufficient sealing while not unduly quickly shortening the life of the case liner.
(37) In some examples, due to blade length variation, the coating may have very low or essentially no abrasive content in an inboard portion. The abrasive material will wear off with the outer portions of the tip coating of the longer blades leaving the abrasive on the tip coating of the shorter blades to handle the duties of interfacing with the case liner.
(38) However, an alternative example wherein the abrasive content is higher near the substrate may achieve equalization of effective blade length by being quickly abraded off the longer blades. This leaves the exposed higher abrasive content layer of the longer blades to abrade the liner while the abrasive of the shorter blades perhaps never engages the liner as the non-abrasive layer above never wears down.
(39) In such exemplary situations where the outer portion of the tip coating is non-abrasive, its thickness does not need to be subject to precise control because it can quickly wear down without correspondingly abrading the liner. Accordingly, other techniques may be used for applying an outboard non-abrasive layer that do not have precise thickness control (e.g., spraying).
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43) The use of first, second, and the like in the following claims is for differentiation within the claim only and does not necessarily indicate relative or absolute importance or temporal order. Similarly, the identification in a claim of one element as first (or the like) does not preclude such first element from identifying an element that is referred to as second (or the like) in another claim or in the description.
(44) Where a measure is given in English units followed by a parenthetical containing SI or other units, the parenthetical's units are a conversion and should not imply a degree of precision not found in the English units.
(45) One or more embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. For example, when applied to an existing baseline configuration, details of such baseline may influence details of particular implementations. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.